VEG VS NON VEG: JUSTIFY

VEG VS NON-VEG ? JUSTIFYYYY WHTS UR CHOICE

  • Total voters
    97
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
@ gudipudiswaroop

Well it could have been other way round too.
The brahmins do not eat Non-veg because of their religious beliefs..

MAJORITY OF THE VEGETARIANS CHOOSE TO BE VEGETARIANS DUE TO RELIGION BELIEFS AND

Most of the human beings, if not throughout the world then at least in India choose their food habit based on their religion.

Now in term of proportion...
Non-veg food can be taken any number of times..
It depends upon peson 2 person...
 
@ gudipudiswaroop

having non veg always leads to fat n digstn probs:

If you read my earlier post even if u take some vegetarian food in excess or only have that...
It could lead to complications...

essential fatty acids i.e. poly unsaturated fatty acids which are not synthesized in the body and have to be provided in the food. Meat contains all the essential fatty acids but no Single Veg source contains all the essential fatty acids. (Essential fatty acids are linoleic acid, linolenic acid and arachidonia acid.)
 
@ harshitarampuria

B4 you say her comments baseless please update urself...
And like u recommended please do a bit of google search yourself.

Wrong comment
Non-vegetarian is not strength giving

Correction
You must be kidding. Non-veg food is widely prescribed for increasing muscle mass.

I literally could not stop laughing on this...
Go to the gym and the veg guys will always say " It takes time for us to build muscles because we do not eat non-veg sob sob"
 
@ bhaskar75


Some ideological vegetarians put forth so called 'humane' reasons for the prohibition of the eating of animal flesh. They argue that we should be kind and compassionate to the living creatures and should not inflict pain nor kill them.

According to ideological vegetarians all life is sacred. This belief can lead to absurdities such as allowing mosquitoes to spread malaria, rats to spread plague, pests like white ants to destroy your home furniture or vipers to run loose in one's premises.

Some people have adopted vegetarianism because they are totally against killing of living creatures.

After it became a universal fact that even plants have life, the reasoning of pure vegetarians changed and they began to argue that plants cannot feel pain. Therefore according to them killing a plant is a lesser crime than killing an animal. Today science tells us that even plants can feel pain.. But the cry of the plant can not be heard by a human being. The human ear can only hear sounds of the frequency between 20 cycles per second to 20,000 cycles per second (cps). Anything below or above this range cannot be heard by human beings. A dog can hear up to 40,000 cps, thus there are silent dog whistle that have frequency of more than 20,000 cps and less than 40,000 ops, These whistles are only heard by dogs and not by human beings. The dog recognizes the master's whistle and comes to the master.
 
harshitarampuria said:
chk on google its availableeeeeeeeeeeee u also gv us link ........frm where u have read that crab things..................
Click to expand...

What 'crab' things are you referring to? I rather like crab things by the way - quite delicious.

Jokes apart, since you're the one who has made the allegation that non-veg food is intrinsically harmful to health, the burden of proof lies on you. I have not alleged anywhere that vegetarian food is intrinsically harmful, so I'm not sure why you want me to prove anything.
 
gudipudiswaroop said:
@cat xavier

Yog Sandesh: Ancient Vedic Knowledge on Health and Natural Healing through Ayurveda, Pranayama and Yoga

i appreciate u r view quite optimistic n geniune,

but u cnt specify like potato r cheese here v r 2 discuss n hav an overall view

Try eating farsan, potato chips and veg. pizza for a 6 month period

if it so, try eating chicken pizza atleast for a 1month period.........
Click to expand...

You've sort of proven my point - as you say yourself, 'we are here to discuss and have an overall view'. So let me lob the ball back in your court - how much do you know of Non-vegetarian food? Are you aware of the wide variety in options available in terms of different kinds of meat, red as well as white? What about fish and eggs? Or that there are any number of healthy receipes for making non-veg food?

Let me try to draw a parallel here. Red meat is like the cheese, potato & farsan of the veg world. Diet exclusively on that and it will have negative implications (regardless of the period). With chicken, eggs and fish, cook intelligently and there's no reason why it should be any less harmful than any other diet.

Look, briefly all I'm trying to say here is that all of us, veg or non-veg (and that preference is a matter of choice) should be eating balanced meals with adequate presence of the essential nutrients.

k let me conclude,

my point is very clr dat, in medical point of view

v cn hv veg food daily atleast 3 times a day as i take it so,

bt v cnt hav non veg 3 times a day def results in digstn probs no matr of wat evr da specific item b......

so ratio is 3:1,

dat means v cnt have non veg in same propotion to veg........

which means veg wins da race........

:SugarwareZ-142:
Click to expand...

It's seeing this kind of logical reasoning that makes me despair of having an intelligent debate on this board. Non-veg is NOT an exclusive diet. It's a PART of a diet which would include vegetables, fruits and bread/rice. Obviously an exclusive non-veg diet is not appropriate, but then no one has an exclusive diet of anything, do they?

Sigh...why do I even bother? You're unlikely to listen to my reasoning anyway.
 
@RAIV 88
Some ideological vegetarians along with other critics need to understand that people living north pole and other snowy places can't find anything other than non.veg items.......probably this must have been the reason in the past for people to take non.veg foods over veg food.....i think both are a part of nature n r imp for it's balance..........so each should not try to dominate each other rather work in cooperation and for love of one another.......
 
ANYWAYS WHAT EVER NON VEGGGIES SAID ATLEAST ON MP SURVEY VEGGGGGG IS THE WINNER 57% WHAT ELSE U WANT TO PROVE LETS C WHO WILL WIN IN THE ENDDDDDD:SugarwareZ-085::SugarwareZ-085::SugarwareZ-085::SugarwareZ-085::SugarwareZ-085:
 
@cat xavier,


Obviously an exclusive non-veg diet is not appropriate, but then no one has an exclusive diet of anything, do they?

well i make one thing clear,

see i am a pure vegeterian n my family2.....my mom dont even eat choclates n cakes also(presence of egg contents) n shz nw abs healthy.......

so i confess i dnt knw about nonveg recepis, it seems dat u knw very well about as u used parallilsm.... so calrify me one thing exclusive non-veg diet is not appropriate
my self hav exclusive veg diet, similarly is it healthy to hav xclusive non veg diet, ofcrse u hv already given ans 4 dis.......

i suggest u 2 obsrve my first post

hi i think its not like that only veg are non veg, some feel dat non veg as a sin n having veg as decsency...but da matr is hungriness n it must b given the foremost prority aftr all all our efforts is to fullfill it....
so, according 2 me der must b no compromise at hungry....whethr veg r non veg....

but if stresd on dis matr i choose veg bcoz having veg has no limitation it always has + effects, but having non veg always leads to fat n digestn probs...


so do observe i mentioned both r given der value, in my opinin if the debate is to choose either veg r non veg.... i choose veg......

n veg has won on non veg......
 
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
I WANNA A RAISE A QUETION IN FRONT OF NON VEGIEES CAN ANY ONE OF THEM SURVIVE BY EATING 100% NON VEG FOOD JUST FOR THE SAKE OF CURIOUSITY I AM ASKING PLS DO REPLY........
 
in my point of view veg is better than non veg . because humanbeing is the only one creature of god that she can take the own decision in a proper way and also apply to his life.so live and let others live should be one of his intention..... so..............
:SugarwareZ-262:
 
we are missing a critical point here. The food prererences are largely due to topographical factors. For the people who evolved in the artic and in the desert resort to survive on meat as that is what they could find in order to survive.

There could be benefits in having vegetarian food, nevertheless the fact remains that food is more a means to survival to the human society and is part of the volutionary process.

The very fact the humans evolved from a single cell to what the homo sapiens, they must have eaten the other species.



R
 
@all
@all non veggis,

its clear dat eventualy veg has won from posts,medical pnt of view, mythologicaly(religion)n human(ethicaly)value.........

so all non vegis do consider all des pts b4 hvng non veg..........

is der ny one 2 chalnge my post n defend der view........alwyz welcm.....

:SugarwareZ-297:
 
I feel Veg is always a better option ........... As we can't find out how health was the animal, who meal we are going to eat:SugarwareZ-189:

Veg can fetch us all the required vitamins so Veg is better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top