The Electoral Issues of Larger Parties – Hit & Misses

The Electoral Issues of Larger Parties – Hit & Misses​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 12th Jan. 2018

The so called larger parties i.e. ones which have a perceived influence over a larger cross-section of voters are political first movers in this ‘Game Yug’ of Electoral rounds. The parties and Netas now at least acknowledge the ‘actual’ issues like Jobs, Argi and Rural economies, lack of credit support & banking biases towards small businesses, corruption & lack of policy support which impacts small businesses unfairly, poor management of government run schools/healthcare facilities etc., leakages in government subsidies, much stronger justice delivery system with better masses friendly investigative machinery. fair distribution of government schemes and fairness in public contracts. Please be assured that the Netas and Parties are increasingly in acknowledgement that it is these ‘Jumlas’ which now work, however that doesn’t mean they are coming out with some ‘deep thoughts’ or 'policy framework' for ‘fixing’ these ‘issues’ as of yet. Politics remains a ‘Musical Chair’ over the Jumlas rather than ‘policy frameworks’ which should be deciding outcome and the commercial news media would want to keep it the same way rather than raising some tough questions as ‘Your’s Truly’ would do in these articles in Management Paradise. As ‘Game’ has already pointed out, some these would perhaps start to get addresses only after the ‘Third Flush’. Presently, we are still moving towards the ‘Second Flush’ and the outcome of this round would make this more apparent going forward.

What is perhaps increasingly clear is that the Netas and Parties have realized the meaning of proverb ‘Electoral Issues’. Earlier, this meant what the Netas is shouting about and what would perhaps get their parties a few votes or may be a few seats in ‘legislative clubs at State/Center’. Now, this increasingly means issues that would propel a ‘change in the government’ or impact ‘which party or coalition will be leading/participating in government’. The electoral politics with epoch-making coalitions getting formed in a jiffy is a clear pointer and increasingly most Netas and parties would be riding similar bandwagon. Ironically ‘Social Media’ or ‘Game’ or ‘Your’s Truly’ is not being blamed or credited for it, but the ‘loud’ Netas claiming it to be their impact while the commercial news media would be the ‘first’ to bring the news sans any analysis of course. The clarity about ‘issues’ still remains at ‘Jumla-level’ for any of the Netas or parties or Coalition, however it is still better that no clarity at all. While some Netas are busy fathoming their ‘Role in the Government’, there are some other which are or would now start looking more strategically on ‘expanding the party’ meaning either absorbing Netas (who have some hold over public is a given area) from some other party into ones’ own. An increasing consolidation amongst these electoral players is predicted with not only more coalitions but also M&As or even pack-ups.

The Large Parties now know that ‘old Jumlas’ aren’t working anymore and would not catapult them to power for sure, based on ‘limited nature of issues’. They realize need of a structural strength in constituency as well as ‘handle over electoral issues (as defined earlier in the article)’, for electoral survival itself now. This ‘handle’ is being able to make right noises, ‘which would get Tele-coverage’ rather than any policy framework. The commercial news media is least interested in any policy framework, in fact doesn’t even want it; but would rather have a ‘deal’ with Netas and parties for shepherding their respective ‘Jumlas’ for public consumption. The good thing is that parties themselves are now dumping Netas in whole-sale who wouldn’t make the cut for these type of Jumlas and consolidation of Netas and parties therefore has become easier, with of course commercial news media quipping on Tele-friendliness of the Netas for sure. However, we keep progressing towards the ‘Third Flush’, nevertheless. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

The electoral issues faced by larger political parties often highlight a complex interplay of successes and failures that can significantly impact their standing and effectiveness. On one hand, these parties typically benefit from substantial resources, established organizational structures, and a broad base of support, which can enable them to dominate the political landscape and shape the national agenda. Their ability to mobilize large numbers of voters and secure significant funding can be decisive in elections, allowing them to campaign on a wide range of issues and reach diverse demographics. This strength is particularly evident in their capacity to field candidates in multiple constituencies, ensuring a strong presence across the country.

However, the size and influence of larger parties also come with challenges. One of the most significant is the difficulty in maintaining ideological consistency and coherence. With a diverse membership and a broad coalition of supporters, larger parties often struggle to cater to the varied and sometimes conflicting interests within their ranks. This can lead to internal factions and divisions, which may be exploited by opponents during elections. Additionally, the bureaucratic nature of these organizations can hinder quick and effective decision-making, making them less agile in responding to rapidly changing political landscapes or emerging issues.

Another common miss for larger parties is the potential for complacency. Their historical success and entrenched positions can sometimes lead to a lack of innovation and a reluctance to adapt to new political realities. This can alienate younger voters and those who are looking for fresh ideas and approaches to governance. Furthermore, larger parties may face scrutiny over their past actions and policies, which can be a double-edged sword. While they can point to a track record of achievements, they are also more likely to have a history of controversies and mistakes that can be dredged up by their opponents.

In terms of hits, larger parties often excel in leveraging their national presence to build alliances and coalitions. They can attract high-profile endorsements and form strategic partnerships with other organizations, which can bolster their electoral prospects. Moreover, their established name recognition can make it easier for them to attract media attention and secure coverage, ensuring that their messages reach a wide audience. This can be particularly advantageous in a crowded political field where smaller parties may struggle to gain visibility.

Despite these advantages, larger parties are not immune to the challenges of voter engagement and loyalty. In an era of increasing political polarization and declining trust in traditional institutions, they must work hard to reconnect with disillusioned voters and demonstrate their relevance in addressing contemporary issues. The ability to balance the needs and expectations of their diverse constituencies while maintaining a clear and compelling vision for the future is critical for their sustained success.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

The Electoral Issues of Larger Parties – Hit & Misses​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 12th Jan. 2018

The so called larger parties i.e. ones which have a perceived influence over a larger cross-section of voters are political first movers in this ‘Game Yug’ of Electoral rounds. The parties and Netas now at least acknowledge the ‘actual’ issues like Jobs, Argi and Rural economies, lack of credit support & banking biases towards small businesses, corruption & lack of policy support which impacts small businesses unfairly, poor management of government run schools/healthcare facilities etc., leakages in government subsidies, much stronger justice delivery system with better masses friendly investigative machinery. fair distribution of government schemes and fairness in public contracts. Please be assured that the Netas and Parties are increasingly in acknowledgement that it is these ‘Jumlas’ which now work, however that doesn’t mean they are coming out with some ‘deep thoughts’ or 'policy framework' for ‘fixing’ these ‘issues’ as of yet. Politics remains a ‘Musical Chair’ over the Jumlas rather than ‘policy frameworks’ which should be deciding outcome and the commercial news media would want to keep it the same way rather than raising some tough questions as ‘Your’s Truly’ would do in these articles in Management Paradise. As ‘Game’ has already pointed out, some these would perhaps start to get addresses only after the ‘Third Flush’. Presently, we are still moving towards the ‘Second Flush’ and the outcome of this round would make this more apparent going forward.

What is perhaps increasingly clear is that the Netas and Parties have realized the meaning of proverb ‘Electoral Issues’. Earlier, this meant what the Netas is shouting about and what would perhaps get their parties a few votes or may be a few seats in ‘legislative clubs at State/Center’. Now, this increasingly means issues that would propel a ‘change in the government’ or impact ‘which party or coalition will be leading/participating in government’. The electoral politics with epoch-making coalitions getting formed in a jiffy is a clear pointer and increasingly most Netas and parties would be riding similar bandwagon. Ironically ‘Social Media’ or ‘Game’ or ‘Your’s Truly’ is not being blamed or credited for it, but the ‘loud’ Netas claiming it to be their impact while the commercial news media would be the ‘first’ to bring the news sans any analysis of course. The clarity about ‘issues’ still remains at ‘Jumla-level’ for any of the Netas or parties or Coalition, however it is still better that no clarity at all. While some Netas are busy fathoming their ‘Role in the Government’, there are some other which are or would now start looking more strategically on ‘expanding the party’ meaning either absorbing Netas (who have some hold over public is a given area) from some other party into ones’ own. An increasing consolidation amongst these electoral players is predicted with not only more coalitions but also M&As or even pack-ups.

The Large Parties now know that ‘old Jumlas’ aren’t working anymore and would not catapult them to power for sure, based on ‘limited nature of issues’. They realize need of a structural strength in constituency as well as ‘handle over electoral issues (as defined earlier in the article)’, for electoral survival itself now. This ‘handle’ is being able to make right noises, ‘which would get Tele-coverage’ rather than any policy framework. The commercial news media is least interested in any policy framework, in fact doesn’t even want it; but would rather have a ‘deal’ with Netas and parties for shepherding their respective ‘Jumlas’ for public consumption. The good thing is that parties themselves are now dumping Netas in whole-sale who wouldn’t make the cut for these type of Jumlas and consolidation of Netas and parties therefore has become easier, with of course commercial news media quipping on Tele-friendliness of the Netas for sure. However, we keep progressing towards the ‘Third Flush’, nevertheless. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…

This political article brilliantly unveils complex truths with both precision and an engaging touch. The writer's writing style is remarkably articulate and nuanced, capable of dissecting intricate political situations while maintaining a captivating flow. It's a testament to their ability to combine rigorous analysis with compelling prose. The structure is meticulously designed, guiding the reader through layers of political context and argumentation with a seamless and intuitive progression. This thoughtful arrangement allows for a comprehensive understanding of the forces at play. Furthermore, the outstanding clarity of the political insights is a defining feature. Arguments are presented with such sharp focus, and conclusions are drawn with such lucid directness, that the article becomes an invaluable resource for anyone seeking a deeper, unambiguous understanding of political realities.