netrashetty
Netra Shetty
Organisational Structure of Unisys : Unisys Corporation (NYSE: UIS), headquartered in Blue Bell,[3][4] Pennsylvania, United States, and incorporated in Delaware,[5] is a global provider of information technology services and programs.
CEO
Edward Coleman
Director
Matthew Espe
Director
Leslie Kenne
Director
Clay Lifflander
Director
Charles McQuade
Director
Denise Fletcher
Director
James Duderstadt
Director
Paul Weaver
Director
Theodore Martin
Director
J. Bolduc
Director
Henry Duques
CFO
Janet Haugen
Outsourcing & Infrastructure
RF
CIO
SM
Development
Lazane Smith
Legal & Secretary
NS
CTO, Consulting & Integratio...
DC
Federal Systems
TD
Human Resources
PB
Control
SH
Investor Relations
JM
Treasurer
SB
There are many facets to effective organizational leadership. The most important facet however is integrity. Leaders are important to individuals, to organizations and to nations. Leaders are the personification of integrity of how institutions are run. They set examples of how to use integrity in business dealings and with individual personal behavior. One of the main differences between management and leadership is integrity.
Leadership, Integrity and Failed Organizations
All one has to do is look to recent history to see how unethical leadership leads to failed organizations. Enron Corporation is one example of how leaders of a multi-billion dollar corporation, by unethical business practices, ruined the lives of thousands. If the officers of Enron had any integrity they would’ve been empathetic to the livelihood of others. Instead of lining their own pocket, they would’ve done what’s right if they had integrity.
Go back throughout history. Leaders without integrity of all types of organizations have been the cause of failed churches, businesses and even nations. The current economic condition is yet another example of leadership without integrity. The officers of lending institutions put integrity aside to increase the bottom line in the short run. A true leader, through the virtues of integrity, would have been empathetic to the detrimental affects on others.
Terminals are not to cross over one another in a nonsensical manner! Another words the communication between each terminal has to be conducted in an orderly manner, usually from top to bottom or bottom to top without crossing over to different departments or posts if those departments or posts are not within the command channel. The best way for different departments to communicate to each other is by department heads or if communication has to take place between departments on a lower level in the chain of command it has to be with the consent of the managers or department heads so there is no unintentional miscommunication and disruption in the flow of the operation. This is not to create a dictatorship, but to create a sane environment where particles and communications can flow flawlessly without any confusion.
To further accomplish this ideal scene, it would be best to divide the business into two major divisions, the division of communication and the division of organization. The division of communication would consist of executives, communications and dissemination and the division of organization would consist of income and disbursement, production and quality control and department of image and public information.
Obviously, the functions of each department within each division has to be broken down properly and hatting for each post has to be provided through thorough training and gained experience. This system brings about stability for the business and good morale for the staff as long as they are recognized.
CEO
Edward Coleman
Director
Matthew Espe
Director
Leslie Kenne
Director
Clay Lifflander
Director
Charles McQuade
Director
Denise Fletcher
Director
James Duderstadt
Director
Paul Weaver
Director
Theodore Martin
Director
J. Bolduc
Director
Henry Duques
CFO
Janet Haugen
Outsourcing & Infrastructure
RF
CIO
SM
Development
Lazane Smith
Legal & Secretary
NS
CTO, Consulting & Integratio...
DC
Federal Systems
TD
Human Resources
PB
Control
SH
Investor Relations
JM
Treasurer
SB
There are many facets to effective organizational leadership. The most important facet however is integrity. Leaders are important to individuals, to organizations and to nations. Leaders are the personification of integrity of how institutions are run. They set examples of how to use integrity in business dealings and with individual personal behavior. One of the main differences between management and leadership is integrity.
Leadership, Integrity and Failed Organizations
All one has to do is look to recent history to see how unethical leadership leads to failed organizations. Enron Corporation is one example of how leaders of a multi-billion dollar corporation, by unethical business practices, ruined the lives of thousands. If the officers of Enron had any integrity they would’ve been empathetic to the livelihood of others. Instead of lining their own pocket, they would’ve done what’s right if they had integrity.
Go back throughout history. Leaders without integrity of all types of organizations have been the cause of failed churches, businesses and even nations. The current economic condition is yet another example of leadership without integrity. The officers of lending institutions put integrity aside to increase the bottom line in the short run. A true leader, through the virtues of integrity, would have been empathetic to the detrimental affects on others.
Terminals are not to cross over one another in a nonsensical manner! Another words the communication between each terminal has to be conducted in an orderly manner, usually from top to bottom or bottom to top without crossing over to different departments or posts if those departments or posts are not within the command channel. The best way for different departments to communicate to each other is by department heads or if communication has to take place between departments on a lower level in the chain of command it has to be with the consent of the managers or department heads so there is no unintentional miscommunication and disruption in the flow of the operation. This is not to create a dictatorship, but to create a sane environment where particles and communications can flow flawlessly without any confusion.
To further accomplish this ideal scene, it would be best to divide the business into two major divisions, the division of communication and the division of organization. The division of communication would consist of executives, communications and dissemination and the division of organization would consist of income and disbursement, production and quality control and department of image and public information.
Obviously, the functions of each department within each division has to be broken down properly and hatting for each post has to be provided through thorough training and gained experience. This system brings about stability for the business and good morale for the staff as long as they are recognized.
Last edited by a moderator: