netrashetty

Netra Shetty
Organisational Structure of Darden Restaurants : Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE: DRI) is a multi-brand restaurant operator headquartered in Orlando, Florida, USA. The firm owns several casual dining restaurant chains, most notably Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, and Red Lobster. Darden owns and operates 1,800 restaurant locations throughout North America and has more than 180,000 employees, making it the largest full-service casual dining company in the world by number of stores. Darden does not franchise its restaurants in the United States, but many of its international locations are not under corporate control

CEO

Clarence Otis

Director

Leonard Berry

Director

David Hughes

Director

William Lewis

Director

Charles Ledsinger

Director

Connie Mack
Director

Maria Sastre

Director

Victoria Harker

Director

Michael Rose

Director

Christopher Fraleigh
Lead Director

Odie Donald
CFO

Bradford Richmond

COO

Andrew Madsen

LongHorn Steakhouse

David George
Development

SS
Group Human Resources

RB
Human Resources

DN
Business Development

JB
Control, CIO

VC
Legal

PS

Government & Community Affai...

Robert McAdam
Olive Garden

DP
Red Lobster

KL
Supply Chain

BM

The evolution of central banking from the last fifty years reflects “a wider acceptance of formal financial models and historical descriptions of central bank policies”. The practice of central banking involves a substantial amount of learning and adapting to changing political and economic climate. As monetary authorities, central banks are considered active participants of stabilizing economic fluctuations, guardian of price stability and influencers of economic outcomes (Siklos, 2002, pp. 1-2). Central banks are traditionally perceived as the agents of government’s financial tasks of conducting monetary policy operations. These are mandated and subjected to changing levels of autonomy (p. 32). Though central banks are highly-legislated, statutory relationship cannot define its daily central banking operations or dictate the influence over personalities who set monetary policies (p. 2).

“The dynamics of central banking conform to a monetary policy that purports a joint responsibility between the government and the central bank itself”. There is a connection between the political structure, autonomy permitted, decision-making and the performance of the central bank (p. 26). For the purpose of understanding the central bank behaviour, “the political structures to consider are as follows: plurality-majority (PM) or is commonly called the ‘winner-take-all’ system, the type wherein members of the legislature are elected by either the majority or the plurality of the voters and proportional representation (PR), the model of balance representation between the majority and minority parties”. Between these structures, the latter involves more political parties compared to the former making it a more consensus-centered

Effective systems follow, serve, and support rather than control, direct, and dictate. The central structure and systems alignment question is "for whose convenience is your organization designed?" Is it to serve customers and those producing for or serving them? Or is it designed to make life easier for management and staff support groups? Look at planning, accounting, invoicing, telephone, information technology, and human resource systems. Just whom are they serving? Systems either enslave or enable. How do people in your organization feel systems are helping or hindering them?

Organization structure and systems are clear indications of management's true values (regardless of what might be printed on pretty parchment paper). How far do they really trust people? How enslaving or enabling are people’s responsibilities and boundaries? When people miss performance targets are they coached or replaced? The answers to these questions are found in the degree of decentralization and autonomy in an organization. What do the people in your organization think about the control and autonomy they have?

To what extent is your system and structure aligned with your team or organization's Focus and Context (vision, values, and purpose)? Your management team needs to agree on the philosophy and approach underpinning any changes to your structure and systems. Get your team to discuss and agree on the key values and characteristics shaping your organization’s structure. How far do you want to go with each one? What are the implications for changes and improvements in your team and the organization? How can you ensure that the structure and system conclusions you arrive at are reflected in your improvement plan? This critical team discussion needs to take place before you reengineer or restructure your organization.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top