ROHAN KACHALIA
Par 100 posts (V.I.P)
The rural market has always been attractive to marketers because of its sheer size and potential. This has become even more so now that the disposable income in rural areas has grown and the media has created a strong consumer aspiration to consume and emulate the lifestyle of the urban consumer.
Media has been successful in unifying the aspirations of urban and rural consumers and in creating benchmarks and goal posts that are similar. Images, values, and lifestyles beamed via TV programming, that would appear to be apparently urban, hold equal attraction for rural consumers as they see this as a process of Sanskritisation and upward mobility.
The dream is to be like the urban consumer and consumption of products and brands is the fastest way to equalise the differences.
The Indian marketer tends to view the rural consumer as less evolved in terms of their lifestyle, mindset and worldview and hence is in an overly basic and subsistence consumption mode. The basket of product offerings tends to be simple, obsolete, cheap and substandard. Is this attitude any different from that of the developed world exporting obsolete and harmful products to developing countries under the guise of affordable value? Some facts and figures on the Rural Indian
41% have access to electricity as compared to 77% of their urban counterparts
600,000 villages with 700 million people
50% of total GDP from rural India
50% of Very rich + Well off households in rural India
I think the rural consumer does not need dumbed-down products that are of either low quality or archaic in their formulation, packaging or sensorials/experience, instead they seek customised products that are in synch with their living reality. Marketers need to customise and innovate to create products that are relevant, workable and yet engaging for the rural consumer.
Thus the rural consumer does not need a discount brand of soap that offers no sensorial pleasure rather they may need an antiseptic formulation which also has skin protecting qualities given that much of the bathing happens around village ponds, rivers and other such water bodies. They do not need cheap and basic detergents but ones that have low suds that use less water to rinse off.
The rural consumer similarly aspires to use mobiles but would benefit if the battery could be solar charged, wishes to own a washing machine that can run on diesel and with stored or limited water. The time has come to end the marketing caste system and for marketers to understand this burgeoning consumer audience better and through a lens that is not patronising.
So do marketers take rural folks merely as poor cousins of big city and metro consumers? Or do marketers understand rural consumers’ psyche, but tend to prioritise markets based on business scalability and profitability?
Please post your views....
Media has been successful in unifying the aspirations of urban and rural consumers and in creating benchmarks and goal posts that are similar. Images, values, and lifestyles beamed via TV programming, that would appear to be apparently urban, hold equal attraction for rural consumers as they see this as a process of Sanskritisation and upward mobility.
The dream is to be like the urban consumer and consumption of products and brands is the fastest way to equalise the differences.
The Indian marketer tends to view the rural consumer as less evolved in terms of their lifestyle, mindset and worldview and hence is in an overly basic and subsistence consumption mode. The basket of product offerings tends to be simple, obsolete, cheap and substandard. Is this attitude any different from that of the developed world exporting obsolete and harmful products to developing countries under the guise of affordable value? Some facts and figures on the Rural Indian
41% have access to electricity as compared to 77% of their urban counterparts
600,000 villages with 700 million people
50% of total GDP from rural India
50% of Very rich + Well off households in rural India
I think the rural consumer does not need dumbed-down products that are of either low quality or archaic in their formulation, packaging or sensorials/experience, instead they seek customised products that are in synch with their living reality. Marketers need to customise and innovate to create products that are relevant, workable and yet engaging for the rural consumer.
Thus the rural consumer does not need a discount brand of soap that offers no sensorial pleasure rather they may need an antiseptic formulation which also has skin protecting qualities given that much of the bathing happens around village ponds, rivers and other such water bodies. They do not need cheap and basic detergents but ones that have low suds that use less water to rinse off.
The rural consumer similarly aspires to use mobiles but would benefit if the battery could be solar charged, wishes to own a washing machine that can run on diesel and with stored or limited water. The time has come to end the marketing caste system and for marketers to understand this burgeoning consumer audience better and through a lens that is not patronising.
So do marketers take rural folks merely as poor cousins of big city and metro consumers? Or do marketers understand rural consumers’ psyche, but tend to prioritise markets based on business scalability and profitability?
Please post your views....