Group incentive scheme fails wherein employer implements them just because of the first and second-order free-rider problems. The idea behind group incentives is simple and compelling employees will be more productive if part of their compensation is tied to business objectives. Sometimes managers need to decide what kind of remuneration they have to use in order to motivate their subordinates to work harder, smarter or faster. As their decision should be wise and fact based they need to know how the incentives they will use influence the motivation of the employees and when to use them. Mangers can decide whether to use individual or group incentives. If the individual incentive plans can't be implemented the group incentive plans take their place and vice versa. The benefits those are seen from group incentives are jotted down:
[*]Motivates staff to achieve organizational goals
[*]Cooperation within a team because pay is tied to achieving a result that takes a group to accomplish
[*]Managerial skill development within a team, skills that can be translated to other teams or the organization as the whole as the market or the teams change.
[*]Group incentive plans are useful when there are no clearly defined individual goals that act as the basis for individual incentive plans
[*]Design a target incentive for the pay for performance plan. An example that I came across solved my query I hope it solves your query too.
[/list]
In the example, the step one example I’m giving you here the individual contributors at 10%, the managers 15%, directors 20%. So, you know if the group achieves its goals exactly we’re going to put 10% away for every individual contributor, 15% for every manager and 20% for every eligible director in this plan. We know, exactly, how much money is going to be put into the pot or the pool or the fund, if, the company hits its assigned goals.
When the work has to be done interdependently, there is a strong reason to base earnings on the performance of a group.
Hence you need to place priorities for accomplishing your goals.
How to measure actual performance in a group pay for performance plan
- Actual performance in each goal area is what needs to be measured in group pay for performance plans. In my example, they achieved their revenue goal at a 105%. They meet that revenue was a 100% they achieve a 105 – I mean, a $100 million they achieve a $105 million. So they did a 105%.
- Net income they did a 120%, you simply multiply those out. And, you get what’s called a Weighted Score. So, you add – and you add them up at the very bottom and you come up with a company overall score.
- In this particular case, we did a 116% in the company overall performance score, it falls between 110%, 119%. So, we’re actually going to put a 120% of all the target incentives for all those people eligible. We’re going to set aside in a pool.
If you take into consideration the individual incentive plan there are few things that you need to care of because they are bound to pop up during the same. Points like individual earnings, quality control, jealousy and individualism, favoritism and morale, cost and time usage etc
Group incentive plans were designed for situations in which the goals of the project are best-suited to individuals working together rather than apart, as is common in creative agencies, such as advertising or film.
The results of a research conducted generally confirms predictions from theory that productivity returns to incentives are non-linear and concave in shape and that the effectiveness of incentives is decreasing in group size