Description
In this such a brief file regarding the role of human resources in the success of new businesses.
The Role of Human Resources in the Success of New Businesses
Michael L. Menefee, Purdue University
J ohn A. Parnell, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
Ed Powers, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
Chris Ziemnowicz, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
This article was originally published in Southern Business Review, fall 2006.
The academic and popular business press are flush with recurring articles on the factors
associated with business success. Examples of business successes and failures abound, thus
articles abound discussing the various causes and trends. Two decades ago, for example, the
Yugo was introduced in the United States. It had as the lowest price automobile on the market,
but the carmaker's American division was bankrupted only four years later due to perceptions of
quality problems and poor dealer service. The same entrepreneur also brought the Subaru line of
cars from J apan and is now developing plans to import cheap cars from China (Rerup, 2OO5).
Will the organizational factors that plagued the Yugo be repeated? Perhaps consumers now
overlook the lack of service and the disposable nature of many contemporary products because
of their (always) low price.
Similar examples abound. During the 1990s, PepsiCo acquired the California Pizza Kitchen
restaurant chain and launched an aggressive growth campaign, opening sixty new stores. Quality
and service management problems resulted in the closure of seventeen stores; however, and
PepsiCo divested the pizza chain only five years later (Parnell, Von Bergen 8 Soper, 2005). More
recently, the success of Internet icons Google and Yahoo has been attributed to a number of
factors, including technical acumen and executive prowess (Effron, Gandossy, 8 Goldsmith,
2003). On the other hand, there are also examples of firms with technological marvels that have
turned into major management blunders, as was the case with Iridium Satellite communications
(Finkelstein 8 Sanford, 2000).
Factors associated with business success have been pervasive topics in the entrepreneurship
literature for decades and have addressed all functional areas of business, such as marketing,
finance, and production (Bruno, Leidecker, & Harder, 1987; Terpstra & Olson, 1993). Business
Resources are usually categorized in three groups: physical, organizational, and human (Koch &
Kok 1999). The human resource has long been identified as critical, and in particular the
experience of management, by affecting the other resources and functions to achieve success
(Penrose, 1959, p. 5). Therefore, this paper considers specific factors in one functional area-
human resources (HR) - and examines relationships to several key organizational attributes. This
paper is based on a survey of firms involved in technology environments because new businesses
in this sector are often seen as the engines in the so-called new economy and their distinctive
human capital needs and composition may help determine their growth or failure.
Review of the Literature
More than 600,000 new businesses are launched in the United States each year (Dennis, 1999).
Carter, Gartner, and Reynolds (1996) described successful entrepreneurs as aggressive in starting
their businesses, making their business tangible to others, finding the most suitable facilities and
equipment, getting financial support, forming a legal entity, managing their resources, and
devoting full time to the business. Lussier (1995) found that successful firms had good resources
in terms of managerial advice and financial support as well as having a detailed and developed
business plan. Cooper (1993) constructed a model of the elements affecting new venture
performance that included the entrepreneur's characteristics including goals, founding process
including reasons for start up, initial firm characteristics, and the environment including risks.
This research led to the conclusion that both the characteristics of the entrepreneur and some
skill set should be explored.
Success and failure is not only linked to characteristics of the entrepreneur, however, but also to
emphasis on key strategic factors (Frese, Brantjes, & Hoorn, 2002; Parnell, Lester, & Menefee,
2000). For example, Reynolds and Miller (1992) describe a fully developed new firm as one that
requires the full time commitment of one or more individuals, is selling a product or service, has
formal financial support and has hired one or more individuals. Vesper (1990) created a new
venture idea checklist. His list includes the basic feasibility of the business, competitive
advantages of the business, buyer decisions in the venture, marketing of the goods and services,
production of the goods and services, staffing decisions in the venture, control of the venture,
and financing the venture. In Pratt's Guide to Venture Capital Sources (1999), they identified
seven areas in which to evaluate new ventures. These areas were marketing and sales;
operations; research, development, and engineering; financial management; general management
and administration; personnel management; and legal and tax aspects.
In a similar vein, researchers have also focused on why firms fail. In an early work by Levitt
(1960) and a later work by Karatko and Hodgetts (2003), they cite lack of objective evaluation of
the business venture, no real insight into the market, inadequate understanding of technical
requirements, poor financial understanding, lack of business uniqueness, and ignorance of legal
issues as leading to business failures. Bruno, Leidecker, and Harder (1987) in analyzing business
failures cited the following factors: poor timing, product design problems, inappropriate
distribution strategy, unclear business definition, over reliance on one customer, assuming debt
too early, venture capital relationship problems, concept of teamwork, and human resource
problems. Zacharakis, Meyer, and DeCastro (1999) cited poor external marketing conditions,
poor management strategy, lack of management skill, and lack of capitalization as the leading
causes of business failure.
A number of studies have noted importance of human resource activities in the success or failure
of a firm (Terpstra & Olson, 1993). Human resource factors form one of the most significant
areas for success of a company (Itami & Roehl, 1987; Castanias & Helfat, 1991; Spender, 1993;
Lei & Hitt, 1995; Conner & Prahalad, 1996). Cooper, Gimeno-Gascon, & Woo (1994), Carter, et
al. (1994), as well as Nucci (1999) wrote that business survival and success is related to human
resource as well as the financial factors at the initial start-up stage. A study of new businesses by
Bamford, Dean, & McDougall (1996) identified acquiring competent human resources was
critical for a venture's success or failure because HR practices (also called personnel in the
literature) influence and may determine if a firm does well in developing its product/service
offer.
There are differences between large and small companies, but Hornsby and Kuratko (1990)
found that concern for the most important future human resource issues is not affected by firm
size. However, Chandler & McEvoy (2000) point out that there are few studies identifying and
validating HR practices in small firms, and even less research focusing on the relationship
between strategy, HR management, and the success of small businesses. A study of small
companies by Chandler & McEvoy (2000) identified the positive effects of HR practices. These
included practices that increased employee skills and motivation, which resulted in improving
productivity. Size and resource capacities make an impact as Hornsby and Kuratko (1990) found
that recruiting, motivating, and retaining employees is one of the biggest problems for small
firms.
There is evidence to suggest that firms in high technology environments face other concerns as
well (Parnell, Carraher & Odom, 2000). Researchers and practitioners have debated the influence
of technology developments on organizational performance ever since the first wave of
information technology (IT) investments occurred about three decades ago (Dedrick, Gurbaxani,
& Kraemer, 2003). Early studies conducted during the 1980s revealed no direct connection
between IT investment and productivity (Roach, 1991; Solow, 1987; Strassman, 1990). During
the mid-1990s, however, more comprehensive studies began to reveal greater links between IT
utilization and productivity (Dedrick, et al., 2003), but not necessarily profitability (Hitt &
Brynjolfsson, 1996), some of which credited IT investment with the economic boom experienced
during the later part of that decade. Nevertheless, the influence of new management practices,
shifts in industry structure, as well as investment in human capital (knowledge, experience, or
skills) cannot be discounted as contributing factors (Dewan & Kraemer, 2000; Melville, 2001).
Moreover, researchers such as Cadbury (1987), Henderson (1982), Kuratko and Hodgetts (2003),
have also made a strong case for the inclusion of a key concern related to human resources -
ethics and social responsibility - as a factor in the success or failure of a business. This issue has
now highlighted because of the cases of top executive lapses in ethics or social responsibility that
have resulted in business collapses of historical proportions.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
Research in the areas of business success and of business failure indicates several common
threads for evaluation. These include the characteristics of entrepreneurs, their ethics, and their
goals. There also needs to be an assessment of skills that involve risk taking, resources
management, legal issues including protection of intellectual property and business formation,
making a business plan, financing the business, accounting for the business, team building,
human resource management), structuring the business, critical thinking including problem
solving, sales, marketing, ethics, leadership, project management, and business assessment.
Another area that should be examined is whether these traditional factors associated with the
socalled old economy business also apply to new technology commercialization businesses.
Moreover, the focus seems to be on the experience and skills of the start-up entrepreneur, yet the
experience of technology businesses indicates a need to examine the human capital of all
employees in a venture as an indicator of potential success or failure.
H0: There is no effect of HR on the success and growth of a company.
Independent of each firm's individual peculiarity, all organizations need effective HR
management. For example, low turnover and the retention of employees, good levels of
satisfaction and morale, as well as the presence of employee development opportunities play
important roles in the success of companies. Thus, the first conjecture is
H1: The degree of a firm's overall HR performance is positively associated with success and
growth.
The approaches to employee recruitment and selection are many. Larger firms often have greater
resources to filter potential workers, yet smaller companies may have greater insight regarding a
potential recruit at the individual level. Regardless of the types of recruitment, tests, interviews,
and measures of potential performance, recruitment and selection of the right people for
company positions affects the probability of success. Thus, the second conjecture is
H2: Effective recruitment and selection is positively associated with success and growth.
Designing and implementing adequate work environments, reward systems, benefits packages
(among others) are part of HR function. These are often critical to retain the highest performing
quality employees. Organizations sometimes have difficulties in keeping their best people from
accepting posts that are more attractive. This is particularly true in the sectors of high demand for
particular human capital. There must exist adequate levels of satisfaction by the employees with
their job and the company. Thus, the next two conjectures are
H3: Retention of quality employees by the company is positively associated with success and
growth.
H4: Employee Satisfaction is positively associated with success and growth.
Companies provide enhancement of human capital by education, training, mentoring and other
programs as a means to improving business outcomes. These programs not only increasing the
skills of employees, but also motivate individuals and inspire new ideas. There are positive
effects in the interrelation between knowledge-structures (such as development and training)
with the growth of organizations. Thus, the fifth conjecture is
H5: Employee training and development is positively associated with success and growth.
Lastly, proper ethical behavior and social responsibility would seem to be expected modes.
However, there continue to be problems in this area. Companies that do good deeds are often the
ones that also do very well. Thus, the last conjecture is
H6: Ethical and socially responsible behavior is positively associated with success and growth.
Methods
A survey instrument was developed to elicit responses regarding the major factors associated
with business success and business failure. A five-point Likert scale (1 =lowest importance, 5 =
highest importance) was utilized with each item in the questionnaire. Respondents were asked to
assess the extent to which each factor was instrumental in the success of a new organization in
the respondent's industry. A summary of the items is shown in Table 1.
Six items related to human resources as a critical success factor. One was based on Terpstra and
Olson's (1993) work. An item associated with the perceived importance of ethics and social
responsibility following the example of Kuratko and Hodgetts (2003). Four specific items were
directly related to HR practices.
Three items asked about innovation, changes in products and processes, as well as changes in
technology. These were used to assess the level of technological influence and threats in the
environment. Several short questions were for classification purposes. Respondents asked to
select the environment of their organizations as high, moderate, or low technology. Items
addressing firm size and age were also included.
Members of rural and urban chambers of commerce in southeastern North Carolina were invited
to participate in the survey, which was administered through an Internet web page. A total of 107
usable responses were obtained, including 24 whose businesses were self-identified as high
technology, 57 moderate technology, and 24 low technology. The mean firm age was 32.4 years,
with a range from one to 139 years. Organizations of various sizes were represented, with 20.6
percent of the respondents reporting annual sales of less than $500,000, 12.1 percent reporting
sales in excess of $25 million, and the remainder in between the two extremes. In addition, 33.6
percent reported fewer than ten employees, 24.3 percent more than 100 employees, with the
remainder in between. Hence, by common standards, most of the firms represented in this survey
would be considered small or medium sized enterprises (SMEs).
Findings & Discussion
The survey and its analysis reveal interesting similarities among small and large organizations
regarding their rankings of the HR success factors. Management approaches to HR issues is
apparently not related by firm size is similar to the findings of Hornsby and Kuratko (1990). A
parallel is also shown in the evaluation of HR area items among the companies that self-reported
in either high or low technology. This seems deviation from traditional thinking. A summary of
the statistics and correlations are reported in Tables 2, 3, and 4. The rankings of HR success
factors in both small and large organizations-with comparisons based upon revenue-are
summarized in Table 2. Rankings of HR success factors, when contrasting high-tech and lowtech
organizations, is shown in Table 3. It also compares the means, but the results are based on the
type of technology environment of the organization. Table 3 shows the correlation between the
main variables. Only one, innovation, has a significant relationship.
The survey results appear inconclusive in indicating significance among most of the variables. In
general, no single HR factor seems to impact business success, perhaps because the items
measured are not really the major factors that determine success among the surveyed SMEs.
However, the innovation variable has some pronounced impact across most of the HR factors. It
has significance in both the t tests and in the correlation analysis. The findings do not reject HO.
This does not mean that HR does not contribute to the success and growth of a company.
Although there is not sufficient evidence, the alternatives may be true.
A larger data set might have resulted in more significant relationships. The way the data was
collected and the cross section or sample space of the population may also have incorporated
some bias. Another issue could be with the perceptions within the technology businesses
themselves. A conjecture could be that some managers within these organizations are linear in
their mode of thinking because that is the way they operate. This may color the results,
particularly on the scale used in the questionnaire. Associations of the 0 and 1 mindset may
result that the survey items were answered as either on or off, and nothing in between. As a
consequence, some of the measures might be biased by the perceptions of the responders.
Terpstra and Olson (1993) in classifying first year problems cited obtaining external financing,
internal financial management, sales and marketing, product development, production and
operations management, general management, human resource management, economic
environment, and regulatory environment. Later, business success or failure may be the result of
problems with the leadership and/or human resource management. In technology related
businesses, firms face greater HR issues. For example, they most often need demand for highly
trained employees in labor markets that are often characterized by a shortage of qualified labor.
Moreover, procedures and routines that are intended to make various processes and the
organization more efficient as it grows and ages often hold back potential innovation and
creativity of employees.
Another problem with some HR strategies is the limited opportunities to give employees' talents
full capacity. This is a significant issue among technologyfocused companies because they often
fall into the SME category. In some companies, expenditures on HR are still treated as a cost
factor. Yet, development of proper HR application helps facilitate business success.
Human resources are more important, and enlightened managers view it as an investment for
future business potential. Lack of effective HR management can force the most productive
employees to leave, taking with them crucial knowledge and experience. Consequently, benefits
from wisdom accumulated over time should be combined with the energy gained from openness
to innovation and change.
Conclusions & Future Research
The research presented contributes to HR development and utilization by attempting to analyze
the role it contributes to business performance. Further research is required in order to obtain a
better picture of the HR practices of firms that are doing well, as well as to identify the specific
practices that may contribute to organizational success or failure. Practical implications of these
findings include developing an HR strategy designed to achieve organizational survival and
success.
Given factors associated with success and failure differ among organizations in high technology
environments, it seems plausible similar differences could be found when other environmental
factors are considered, such as the degree of governmental regulation, the level of competitive
intensity, and global influences on the firm.
It is likely critical success factors associated with human resources vary by industry. This factor
was not considered in the study, however, and could be assessed in future studies.
References
Bamford, C. E., T. J . Dean, 8 P. P. McDougall. (1996) Initial founding conditions and new firm
performance: A Longitudinal Study Integrating Predictions from Multiple Perspectives. Frontiers
of Entrepreneur ship Research: 465-479.
Bates, T. (1990) Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity. Review of
Economics and Statistics LXXII(4): 551-560.
Bruno, A. V., Leidecker, J . K. & Harder, J . W. (1987). Why firms fail. Business Horizons, 30(2),
50-58.
Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare.
Information Systems Research, 7(3), 281-300.
Cadbury, A. (1987). Ethical managers make their own rules. Harvard Business Review,
September/October, 64.
Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences.
J ournal of Business Venturing, May, 151-166.
Carter, N. M., T. M. Stearns, P. D. Reynolds, & B. A. Miller. (1994) "New Venture Strategies:
Theory Development with an Empirical Base." Strategic Management J ournal 15: 21-41.
Chandler, G. N. 8 Mcevoy, G. M. (2000). Human Resource Management, TQM and Firm
Performance in Small and Medium-Size Enterprises Entrepreneur ship: Theory and Practice,
Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 43-58.
Cooper, A. C. (1993). Challenges in predicting new firm performance. J ournal of Business
Venturing, May, 241-253.
Cooper, A. C., F. J . Gimeno-Gascon, & C. Y. Woo. (1994) Initial Human and Financial Capital
as Predictors of New Venture Performance. J ournal of Business Venturing 9: 371-395
Dedrick, J ., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. (2003). Information technology and economic
performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1-
28.Dennis, W. J . (1999). Business starts and stops. Washington, DC: National Federation of
Independent Business.
Dewan, S., & Kraemer, K. (2000). Information technology and productivity: Preliminary
evidence from countrylevel data. Management Science, 46(4), 548-562.
Effron, M.; Gandossy, R. & Goldsmith, M. eds. (2003). Human Resources in the 21st Century.
Wiley: Hoboken, New J ersey.
Finkelstein, S. & Sanford, S. H. (2000). Learning from Corporate Mistakes: The Rise and Fall of
Iridium. Organizational Dynamics, 29 (2): S138-148
Frese, M., Brantjes, A. & Hoorn, R. (2002). Psychological success factors of small scale
businesses in Namibia: The roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation, and the
environment. J ournal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 259-282.
Henderson, V. E. (1982). The ethical side of enterprise. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 38.
Hornsby, J . S., & Kuratko, D. F. (1990). Human resource management in small business: Critical
issues for the 1990's. J ournal of Small Business Management , 28(3), 9-18.
J acobson, R. (1987). The validity of ROI as a measure of business performance. American
Economic Review, 778: 470-478.
Koch, C. L. Y. & de Kok, J . M. P. (1999). A HumanResource-Based Theory of the Small Firm,
Research Report 9906/E, EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy, Zoetermeer
Kuratko, D. F. & Hodgetts, R. M. (2003). Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach.
Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, J uly/August, 45-56.
Lussier, R. N. (1995). A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction model for young
firms. J ournal of Small Business Management, J anuary, 8-20.
Nucci, A. R. (1999) "The Demography of Business Closings." Small Business Economics 12:
25-39.
Parnell, J . A., Lester, D. L., & Menefee, M. L. (2000). Strategy as a response to organizational
uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management
Decision, 38, 531-540.
Parnell, J .A., Carraher, S., & Odom, R. (2000). Strategy and performance in the entrepreneurial
computer software industry. J ournal of Business & Entrepreneur ship, 22(3), 49-66.
Parnell, J .A., Von Bergen, C.W., & Soper, B. (2005). Profiting from past triumphs and failures:
Harnessing history for future successes. SAM Advanced Management J ournal, 70(2), 36-44.
Pratt's Guide to Venture Capital Sources (1999). Wellesley, MA: Venture Economics.
Rerup, C. (2005) Learning from past experience: Footnotes on mindfulness and habitual
entrepreneurship. Scandinavian J ournal of Management. 21 pp. 451-472
Reynolds, P. & Miller, B. (1992). New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implication for
research. J ournal of Business Venturing, September, 405-417.
Roach, S. (1991). Services under siege: The restructuring imperative. Harvard Business Review,
39(2), 82-92.
Solow, R.M. (1987). We'd better watch out, New York Times, J uly 12, Book Review, No. 36.
Strassman, P. (1990). The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide. New Canaan,
CT: Information Economics Press.
Terpstra, D. E. & Oison, P. D. (1993). Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: A classification of
problems. Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 5-20.
Tully, J . (1994). America's best wealth creators. Fortune, 31 (Nov.): 143.
Vesper, K. H. (1990). New Venture Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Zacharakis, A. L., Meyer, G. D., & DeCastro, J . (1999). Differing perceptions of new venture
failure: A matched exploratory study of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. J ournal of Small
Business Management, J uly, 1999, 1-14.
doc_633561003.pdf
In this such a brief file regarding the role of human resources in the success of new businesses.
The Role of Human Resources in the Success of New Businesses
Michael L. Menefee, Purdue University
J ohn A. Parnell, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
Ed Powers, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
Chris Ziemnowicz, University of North Carolina – Pembroke
This article was originally published in Southern Business Review, fall 2006.
The academic and popular business press are flush with recurring articles on the factors
associated with business success. Examples of business successes and failures abound, thus
articles abound discussing the various causes and trends. Two decades ago, for example, the
Yugo was introduced in the United States. It had as the lowest price automobile on the market,
but the carmaker's American division was bankrupted only four years later due to perceptions of
quality problems and poor dealer service. The same entrepreneur also brought the Subaru line of
cars from J apan and is now developing plans to import cheap cars from China (Rerup, 2OO5).
Will the organizational factors that plagued the Yugo be repeated? Perhaps consumers now
overlook the lack of service and the disposable nature of many contemporary products because
of their (always) low price.
Similar examples abound. During the 1990s, PepsiCo acquired the California Pizza Kitchen
restaurant chain and launched an aggressive growth campaign, opening sixty new stores. Quality
and service management problems resulted in the closure of seventeen stores; however, and
PepsiCo divested the pizza chain only five years later (Parnell, Von Bergen 8 Soper, 2005). More
recently, the success of Internet icons Google and Yahoo has been attributed to a number of
factors, including technical acumen and executive prowess (Effron, Gandossy, 8 Goldsmith,
2003). On the other hand, there are also examples of firms with technological marvels that have
turned into major management blunders, as was the case with Iridium Satellite communications
(Finkelstein 8 Sanford, 2000).
Factors associated with business success have been pervasive topics in the entrepreneurship
literature for decades and have addressed all functional areas of business, such as marketing,
finance, and production (Bruno, Leidecker, & Harder, 1987; Terpstra & Olson, 1993). Business
Resources are usually categorized in three groups: physical, organizational, and human (Koch &
Kok 1999). The human resource has long been identified as critical, and in particular the
experience of management, by affecting the other resources and functions to achieve success
(Penrose, 1959, p. 5). Therefore, this paper considers specific factors in one functional area-
human resources (HR) - and examines relationships to several key organizational attributes. This
paper is based on a survey of firms involved in technology environments because new businesses
in this sector are often seen as the engines in the so-called new economy and their distinctive
human capital needs and composition may help determine their growth or failure.
Review of the Literature
More than 600,000 new businesses are launched in the United States each year (Dennis, 1999).
Carter, Gartner, and Reynolds (1996) described successful entrepreneurs as aggressive in starting
their businesses, making their business tangible to others, finding the most suitable facilities and
equipment, getting financial support, forming a legal entity, managing their resources, and
devoting full time to the business. Lussier (1995) found that successful firms had good resources
in terms of managerial advice and financial support as well as having a detailed and developed
business plan. Cooper (1993) constructed a model of the elements affecting new venture
performance that included the entrepreneur's characteristics including goals, founding process
including reasons for start up, initial firm characteristics, and the environment including risks.
This research led to the conclusion that both the characteristics of the entrepreneur and some
skill set should be explored.
Success and failure is not only linked to characteristics of the entrepreneur, however, but also to
emphasis on key strategic factors (Frese, Brantjes, & Hoorn, 2002; Parnell, Lester, & Menefee,
2000). For example, Reynolds and Miller (1992) describe a fully developed new firm as one that
requires the full time commitment of one or more individuals, is selling a product or service, has
formal financial support and has hired one or more individuals. Vesper (1990) created a new
venture idea checklist. His list includes the basic feasibility of the business, competitive
advantages of the business, buyer decisions in the venture, marketing of the goods and services,
production of the goods and services, staffing decisions in the venture, control of the venture,
and financing the venture. In Pratt's Guide to Venture Capital Sources (1999), they identified
seven areas in which to evaluate new ventures. These areas were marketing and sales;
operations; research, development, and engineering; financial management; general management
and administration; personnel management; and legal and tax aspects.
In a similar vein, researchers have also focused on why firms fail. In an early work by Levitt
(1960) and a later work by Karatko and Hodgetts (2003), they cite lack of objective evaluation of
the business venture, no real insight into the market, inadequate understanding of technical
requirements, poor financial understanding, lack of business uniqueness, and ignorance of legal
issues as leading to business failures. Bruno, Leidecker, and Harder (1987) in analyzing business
failures cited the following factors: poor timing, product design problems, inappropriate
distribution strategy, unclear business definition, over reliance on one customer, assuming debt
too early, venture capital relationship problems, concept of teamwork, and human resource
problems. Zacharakis, Meyer, and DeCastro (1999) cited poor external marketing conditions,
poor management strategy, lack of management skill, and lack of capitalization as the leading
causes of business failure.
A number of studies have noted importance of human resource activities in the success or failure
of a firm (Terpstra & Olson, 1993). Human resource factors form one of the most significant
areas for success of a company (Itami & Roehl, 1987; Castanias & Helfat, 1991; Spender, 1993;
Lei & Hitt, 1995; Conner & Prahalad, 1996). Cooper, Gimeno-Gascon, & Woo (1994), Carter, et
al. (1994), as well as Nucci (1999) wrote that business survival and success is related to human
resource as well as the financial factors at the initial start-up stage. A study of new businesses by
Bamford, Dean, & McDougall (1996) identified acquiring competent human resources was
critical for a venture's success or failure because HR practices (also called personnel in the
literature) influence and may determine if a firm does well in developing its product/service
offer.
There are differences between large and small companies, but Hornsby and Kuratko (1990)
found that concern for the most important future human resource issues is not affected by firm
size. However, Chandler & McEvoy (2000) point out that there are few studies identifying and
validating HR practices in small firms, and even less research focusing on the relationship
between strategy, HR management, and the success of small businesses. A study of small
companies by Chandler & McEvoy (2000) identified the positive effects of HR practices. These
included practices that increased employee skills and motivation, which resulted in improving
productivity. Size and resource capacities make an impact as Hornsby and Kuratko (1990) found
that recruiting, motivating, and retaining employees is one of the biggest problems for small
firms.
There is evidence to suggest that firms in high technology environments face other concerns as
well (Parnell, Carraher & Odom, 2000). Researchers and practitioners have debated the influence
of technology developments on organizational performance ever since the first wave of
information technology (IT) investments occurred about three decades ago (Dedrick, Gurbaxani,
& Kraemer, 2003). Early studies conducted during the 1980s revealed no direct connection
between IT investment and productivity (Roach, 1991; Solow, 1987; Strassman, 1990). During
the mid-1990s, however, more comprehensive studies began to reveal greater links between IT
utilization and productivity (Dedrick, et al., 2003), but not necessarily profitability (Hitt &
Brynjolfsson, 1996), some of which credited IT investment with the economic boom experienced
during the later part of that decade. Nevertheless, the influence of new management practices,
shifts in industry structure, as well as investment in human capital (knowledge, experience, or
skills) cannot be discounted as contributing factors (Dewan & Kraemer, 2000; Melville, 2001).
Moreover, researchers such as Cadbury (1987), Henderson (1982), Kuratko and Hodgetts (2003),
have also made a strong case for the inclusion of a key concern related to human resources -
ethics and social responsibility - as a factor in the success or failure of a business. This issue has
now highlighted because of the cases of top executive lapses in ethics or social responsibility that
have resulted in business collapses of historical proportions.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
Research in the areas of business success and of business failure indicates several common
threads for evaluation. These include the characteristics of entrepreneurs, their ethics, and their
goals. There also needs to be an assessment of skills that involve risk taking, resources
management, legal issues including protection of intellectual property and business formation,
making a business plan, financing the business, accounting for the business, team building,
human resource management), structuring the business, critical thinking including problem
solving, sales, marketing, ethics, leadership, project management, and business assessment.
Another area that should be examined is whether these traditional factors associated with the
socalled old economy business also apply to new technology commercialization businesses.
Moreover, the focus seems to be on the experience and skills of the start-up entrepreneur, yet the
experience of technology businesses indicates a need to examine the human capital of all
employees in a venture as an indicator of potential success or failure.
H0: There is no effect of HR on the success and growth of a company.
Independent of each firm's individual peculiarity, all organizations need effective HR
management. For example, low turnover and the retention of employees, good levels of
satisfaction and morale, as well as the presence of employee development opportunities play
important roles in the success of companies. Thus, the first conjecture is
H1: The degree of a firm's overall HR performance is positively associated with success and
growth.
The approaches to employee recruitment and selection are many. Larger firms often have greater
resources to filter potential workers, yet smaller companies may have greater insight regarding a
potential recruit at the individual level. Regardless of the types of recruitment, tests, interviews,
and measures of potential performance, recruitment and selection of the right people for
company positions affects the probability of success. Thus, the second conjecture is
H2: Effective recruitment and selection is positively associated with success and growth.
Designing and implementing adequate work environments, reward systems, benefits packages
(among others) are part of HR function. These are often critical to retain the highest performing
quality employees. Organizations sometimes have difficulties in keeping their best people from
accepting posts that are more attractive. This is particularly true in the sectors of high demand for
particular human capital. There must exist adequate levels of satisfaction by the employees with
their job and the company. Thus, the next two conjectures are
H3: Retention of quality employees by the company is positively associated with success and
growth.
H4: Employee Satisfaction is positively associated with success and growth.
Companies provide enhancement of human capital by education, training, mentoring and other
programs as a means to improving business outcomes. These programs not only increasing the
skills of employees, but also motivate individuals and inspire new ideas. There are positive
effects in the interrelation between knowledge-structures (such as development and training)
with the growth of organizations. Thus, the fifth conjecture is
H5: Employee training and development is positively associated with success and growth.
Lastly, proper ethical behavior and social responsibility would seem to be expected modes.
However, there continue to be problems in this area. Companies that do good deeds are often the
ones that also do very well. Thus, the last conjecture is
H6: Ethical and socially responsible behavior is positively associated with success and growth.
Methods
A survey instrument was developed to elicit responses regarding the major factors associated
with business success and business failure. A five-point Likert scale (1 =lowest importance, 5 =
highest importance) was utilized with each item in the questionnaire. Respondents were asked to
assess the extent to which each factor was instrumental in the success of a new organization in
the respondent's industry. A summary of the items is shown in Table 1.
Six items related to human resources as a critical success factor. One was based on Terpstra and
Olson's (1993) work. An item associated with the perceived importance of ethics and social
responsibility following the example of Kuratko and Hodgetts (2003). Four specific items were
directly related to HR practices.
Three items asked about innovation, changes in products and processes, as well as changes in
technology. These were used to assess the level of technological influence and threats in the
environment. Several short questions were for classification purposes. Respondents asked to
select the environment of their organizations as high, moderate, or low technology. Items
addressing firm size and age were also included.
Members of rural and urban chambers of commerce in southeastern North Carolina were invited
to participate in the survey, which was administered through an Internet web page. A total of 107
usable responses were obtained, including 24 whose businesses were self-identified as high
technology, 57 moderate technology, and 24 low technology. The mean firm age was 32.4 years,
with a range from one to 139 years. Organizations of various sizes were represented, with 20.6
percent of the respondents reporting annual sales of less than $500,000, 12.1 percent reporting
sales in excess of $25 million, and the remainder in between the two extremes. In addition, 33.6
percent reported fewer than ten employees, 24.3 percent more than 100 employees, with the
remainder in between. Hence, by common standards, most of the firms represented in this survey
would be considered small or medium sized enterprises (SMEs).
Findings & Discussion
The survey and its analysis reveal interesting similarities among small and large organizations
regarding their rankings of the HR success factors. Management approaches to HR issues is
apparently not related by firm size is similar to the findings of Hornsby and Kuratko (1990). A
parallel is also shown in the evaluation of HR area items among the companies that self-reported
in either high or low technology. This seems deviation from traditional thinking. A summary of
the statistics and correlations are reported in Tables 2, 3, and 4. The rankings of HR success
factors in both small and large organizations-with comparisons based upon revenue-are
summarized in Table 2. Rankings of HR success factors, when contrasting high-tech and lowtech
organizations, is shown in Table 3. It also compares the means, but the results are based on the
type of technology environment of the organization. Table 3 shows the correlation between the
main variables. Only one, innovation, has a significant relationship.
The survey results appear inconclusive in indicating significance among most of the variables. In
general, no single HR factor seems to impact business success, perhaps because the items
measured are not really the major factors that determine success among the surveyed SMEs.
However, the innovation variable has some pronounced impact across most of the HR factors. It
has significance in both the t tests and in the correlation analysis. The findings do not reject HO.
This does not mean that HR does not contribute to the success and growth of a company.
Although there is not sufficient evidence, the alternatives may be true.
A larger data set might have resulted in more significant relationships. The way the data was
collected and the cross section or sample space of the population may also have incorporated
some bias. Another issue could be with the perceptions within the technology businesses
themselves. A conjecture could be that some managers within these organizations are linear in
their mode of thinking because that is the way they operate. This may color the results,
particularly on the scale used in the questionnaire. Associations of the 0 and 1 mindset may
result that the survey items were answered as either on or off, and nothing in between. As a
consequence, some of the measures might be biased by the perceptions of the responders.
Terpstra and Olson (1993) in classifying first year problems cited obtaining external financing,
internal financial management, sales and marketing, product development, production and
operations management, general management, human resource management, economic
environment, and regulatory environment. Later, business success or failure may be the result of
problems with the leadership and/or human resource management. In technology related
businesses, firms face greater HR issues. For example, they most often need demand for highly
trained employees in labor markets that are often characterized by a shortage of qualified labor.
Moreover, procedures and routines that are intended to make various processes and the
organization more efficient as it grows and ages often hold back potential innovation and
creativity of employees.
Another problem with some HR strategies is the limited opportunities to give employees' talents
full capacity. This is a significant issue among technologyfocused companies because they often
fall into the SME category. In some companies, expenditures on HR are still treated as a cost
factor. Yet, development of proper HR application helps facilitate business success.
Human resources are more important, and enlightened managers view it as an investment for
future business potential. Lack of effective HR management can force the most productive
employees to leave, taking with them crucial knowledge and experience. Consequently, benefits
from wisdom accumulated over time should be combined with the energy gained from openness
to innovation and change.
Conclusions & Future Research
The research presented contributes to HR development and utilization by attempting to analyze
the role it contributes to business performance. Further research is required in order to obtain a
better picture of the HR practices of firms that are doing well, as well as to identify the specific
practices that may contribute to organizational success or failure. Practical implications of these
findings include developing an HR strategy designed to achieve organizational survival and
success.
Given factors associated with success and failure differ among organizations in high technology
environments, it seems plausible similar differences could be found when other environmental
factors are considered, such as the degree of governmental regulation, the level of competitive
intensity, and global influences on the firm.
It is likely critical success factors associated with human resources vary by industry. This factor
was not considered in the study, however, and could be assessed in future studies.
References
Bamford, C. E., T. J . Dean, 8 P. P. McDougall. (1996) Initial founding conditions and new firm
performance: A Longitudinal Study Integrating Predictions from Multiple Perspectives. Frontiers
of Entrepreneur ship Research: 465-479.
Bates, T. (1990) Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity. Review of
Economics and Statistics LXXII(4): 551-560.
Bruno, A. V., Leidecker, J . K. & Harder, J . W. (1987). Why firms fail. Business Horizons, 30(2),
50-58.
Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare.
Information Systems Research, 7(3), 281-300.
Cadbury, A. (1987). Ethical managers make their own rules. Harvard Business Review,
September/October, 64.
Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences.
J ournal of Business Venturing, May, 151-166.
Carter, N. M., T. M. Stearns, P. D. Reynolds, & B. A. Miller. (1994) "New Venture Strategies:
Theory Development with an Empirical Base." Strategic Management J ournal 15: 21-41.
Chandler, G. N. 8 Mcevoy, G. M. (2000). Human Resource Management, TQM and Firm
Performance in Small and Medium-Size Enterprises Entrepreneur ship: Theory and Practice,
Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 43-58.
Cooper, A. C. (1993). Challenges in predicting new firm performance. J ournal of Business
Venturing, May, 241-253.
Cooper, A. C., F. J . Gimeno-Gascon, & C. Y. Woo. (1994) Initial Human and Financial Capital
as Predictors of New Venture Performance. J ournal of Business Venturing 9: 371-395
Dedrick, J ., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. (2003). Information technology and economic
performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1-
28.Dennis, W. J . (1999). Business starts and stops. Washington, DC: National Federation of
Independent Business.
Dewan, S., & Kraemer, K. (2000). Information technology and productivity: Preliminary
evidence from countrylevel data. Management Science, 46(4), 548-562.
Effron, M.; Gandossy, R. & Goldsmith, M. eds. (2003). Human Resources in the 21st Century.
Wiley: Hoboken, New J ersey.
Finkelstein, S. & Sanford, S. H. (2000). Learning from Corporate Mistakes: The Rise and Fall of
Iridium. Organizational Dynamics, 29 (2): S138-148
Frese, M., Brantjes, A. & Hoorn, R. (2002). Psychological success factors of small scale
businesses in Namibia: The roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation, and the
environment. J ournal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 259-282.
Henderson, V. E. (1982). The ethical side of enterprise. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 38.
Hornsby, J . S., & Kuratko, D. F. (1990). Human resource management in small business: Critical
issues for the 1990's. J ournal of Small Business Management , 28(3), 9-18.
J acobson, R. (1987). The validity of ROI as a measure of business performance. American
Economic Review, 778: 470-478.
Koch, C. L. Y. & de Kok, J . M. P. (1999). A HumanResource-Based Theory of the Small Firm,
Research Report 9906/E, EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy, Zoetermeer
Kuratko, D. F. & Hodgetts, R. M. (2003). Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach.
Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, J uly/August, 45-56.
Lussier, R. N. (1995). A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction model for young
firms. J ournal of Small Business Management, J anuary, 8-20.
Nucci, A. R. (1999) "The Demography of Business Closings." Small Business Economics 12:
25-39.
Parnell, J . A., Lester, D. L., & Menefee, M. L. (2000). Strategy as a response to organizational
uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management
Decision, 38, 531-540.
Parnell, J .A., Carraher, S., & Odom, R. (2000). Strategy and performance in the entrepreneurial
computer software industry. J ournal of Business & Entrepreneur ship, 22(3), 49-66.
Parnell, J .A., Von Bergen, C.W., & Soper, B. (2005). Profiting from past triumphs and failures:
Harnessing history for future successes. SAM Advanced Management J ournal, 70(2), 36-44.
Pratt's Guide to Venture Capital Sources (1999). Wellesley, MA: Venture Economics.
Rerup, C. (2005) Learning from past experience: Footnotes on mindfulness and habitual
entrepreneurship. Scandinavian J ournal of Management. 21 pp. 451-472
Reynolds, P. & Miller, B. (1992). New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implication for
research. J ournal of Business Venturing, September, 405-417.
Roach, S. (1991). Services under siege: The restructuring imperative. Harvard Business Review,
39(2), 82-92.
Solow, R.M. (1987). We'd better watch out, New York Times, J uly 12, Book Review, No. 36.
Strassman, P. (1990). The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide. New Canaan,
CT: Information Economics Press.
Terpstra, D. E. & Oison, P. D. (1993). Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: A classification of
problems. Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 5-20.
Tully, J . (1994). America's best wealth creators. Fortune, 31 (Nov.): 143.
Vesper, K. H. (1990). New Venture Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Zacharakis, A. L., Meyer, G. D., & DeCastro, J . (1999). Differing perceptions of new venture
failure: A matched exploratory study of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. J ournal of Small
Business Management, J uly, 1999, 1-14.
doc_633561003.pdf