The pen is mightier than the sword

[swatiraohnlu]

Nonviolence (as opposed to spilling blood) is a weapon unique in history. Not only does it ennoble the man who wields it, but it also effectively heals the wounds. The African-American Civil Rights Movement is a shining example of how nonviolent protest gained moral justification and thus won this very struggle. The pen is mightier than the sword, would you agree?

 

[swatiraohnlu]

Quick action is sometimes essential for success. In cases of genocides or violent regime changes it is important to act as soon as possible. Negotiation or discussions hardly allow for that. Deeds, not words. Hardly can we negotiate with terrorists, insurgents, or guerilla. As these groups violate the pillars our society stands on - freedom, justice, democracy, etc. - we need to act instead of prevaricating in national parliaments or international bodies.

 

[dimpy.handa]

I've been thinking about the saying lately and wanted to hear other people's views on what it means or any random thoughts that pop into their heads when hearing it. I'm also going to give an answer:
I understand the meaning behind it as words and communication being more powerful than wars and fighting. However, I think it was worded badly. Taken in the literal sense and some mongoloids may take it, it can be disproved: bring your pen and I'll bring my sword, and while you are writing I will slit your throat. I think it was just worded in a way that confuses people in an attempt to make it sound more intelligent. I think the much more blunt meaning of the use of words being more powerful than that of fighting sounds much more intelligent, makes more sense, and cannot be misinterpreted.