The Job Role Dilemma



The Job Role Dilemma[/b]

"People can't live with change if there's not a changeless core inside them. The key to the ability to change is a changeless sense of who you are, what you are about and what you value." --Stephen Covey[/i][/b]

"Everybody has accepted by now that change is unavoidable. But that still implies that change is like death and taxes it should be postponed as long as possible and no change would be vastly preferable. But in a period of upheaval, such as the one we are living in, change is the norm." --Peter F. Drucker[/i][/b]

Employee dissatisfaction is inevitable whenever there are changing expectations, changes in role and responsibility, restructuring in the organization, etc. Employees represent different cultures, work styles and personalities.

What happens when you are faced with an uninteresting job in your organisation? How to deal with choosing between your objectives, your goals and your current job.

Have you ever been faced with the dilemma of having an uninspiring job?

I have seen many a hopeful faced with this exact dilemma. Having a job you feel does not meet your needs for mental stimulation or is below your expertise level can often be demotivating and stressful.

The old job no longer challenges you, your interest is now elsewhere, or you don’t see any option to progress. Naturally, many employees at this stage focus on finding something completely new.

At this stage it is desirable that the employee seek counselling or follows a consultative approach by meeting his immediate supervisor and the HR Manager for help in this job role dilemma.

In such cases a positive working relationship between HR and line management facilitates easier handling of employee workplace investigations and narrowing/curtailing differences of the employees. When HR and line management work together, it’s easier for HR to investigate workplace issues because the human resource staff may have greater confidence that line managers document their employment actions and decisions appropriately and according to company policy.

The employee’s problems can be solved to a great extent when the line manager as well as the HR Manager together step in and with their expertise are able to adequately address the issues

 
This is a very relevant dilemma, especially in today’s fast-changing work environment. Feeling stuck in an uninspiring job is more common than most organizations realize, and if left unaddressed, it can silently affect both morale and productivity. I completely agree that the key lies in open dialogue and collaboration between the employee, line manager, and HR. A transparent, consultative approach allows for realignment—whether through reskilling, internal transfers, or even role redesign. Sometimes, just being heard can rekindle motivation. A proactive HR culture that normalizes these conversations can turn dissatisfaction into development.
 
The article titled “The Job Role Dilemma” poignantly captures a reality many employees face in today’s dynamic work environment: coping with change and dissatisfaction in their roles. It succinctly frames the dilemma of feeling unchallenged, unmotivated, or stuck in a job that no longer aligns with one’s aspirations or expertise. The quotes by Stephen Covey and Peter Drucker at the outset effectively set the philosophical tone—change is inevitable, but our core values and self-understanding provide the anchor we need to navigate it.


Employee dissatisfaction amid changing roles or organizational restructuring is indeed a widespread phenomenon. The article rightly points out that diverse work styles, cultures, and personalities mean employees react differently to changes, making the management of these transitions delicate and complex. From my perspective, one of the most valuable takeaways is the emphasis on seeking dialogue and support within the organization rather than unilateral decisions by the employee. The suggestion to involve supervisors and HR in a consultative manner underlines a practical approach to solving the “job role dilemma.”


This consultative approach is crucial because it promotes transparency and trust, which are often eroded when employees feel isolated in their dissatisfaction. When HR and line managers collaborate, it enhances the possibility of understanding the employee’s concerns and aspirations, facilitating tailored solutions—be it role adjustments, training, or exploring new career paths within the company. The article’s point about documentation and adherence to policy is also vital, as it ensures fairness and clarity, mitigating misunderstandings or conflicts.


However, while the article correctly identifies that the old job may no longer inspire, it could also benefit from elaborating on proactive steps employees might take on their own. For instance, continuous skill development, networking, or even internal job rotations can empower employees to re-engage with their work. Equally, organizations can foster a culture where change is seen not as a threat but as an opportunity for growth, emphasizing learning agility and resilience.


Moreover, while counseling and managerial support are necessary, employees should also cultivate a “changeless core” — an internal compass of their values and goals, as Stephen Covey suggests. This self-awareness not only makes change more manageable but also helps employees align their career choices with what truly matters to them, thereby reducing stress and dissatisfaction.


In conclusion, the article offers a balanced, realistic view of the “job role dilemma.” It thoughtfully addresses the emotional and procedural aspects of dealing with job dissatisfaction amid change and highlights the importance of cooperative problem-solving between employees, HR, and managers. Incorporating additional emphasis on personal development and organizational culture change would further enhance its practical value. Overall, it is an insightful guide for both employees and management navigating the complexities of evolving job roles.
 
The provided text, "The Job Role Dilemma," delves into a common yet challenging situation many employees face: dissatisfaction with an uninteresting or unfulfilling job role. It eloquently sets the stage with quotes from Stephen Covey and Peter F. Drucker, emphasizing the inherent human need for a stable core amidst unavoidable change. The core problem highlighted is the mismatch between an employee's personal goals and the demands or nature of their current position.


Understanding the Dilemma​

The author accurately identifies that employee dissatisfaction often stems from evolving expectations, shifts in roles and responsibilities, or organizational restructuring. When a job no longer offers mental stimulation, challenges, or opportunities for progression, it naturally leads to demotivation and stress. This feeling of being "below one's expertise level" or having interests lie elsewhere can push employees to seek new opportunities entirely. This scenario is a common experience, impacting morale and productivity.


The Role of Management and HR​

Crucially, the article proposes a proactive and collaborative solution: instead of immediately seeking external opportunities, employees should seek counselling or adopt a consultative approach. This involves engaging with their immediate supervisor and the HR Manager. This highlights the importance of open communication channels within an organization.

The text emphasizes that a positive working relationship between HR and line management is vital in addressing these dilemmas. When these two functions collaborate effectively, it allows for easier investigation of workplace issues and a more constructive approach to resolving employee concerns. The synergy between HR's policy adherence and the line manager's direct understanding of the employee's role and performance can lead to more effective problem-solving. This collaboration builds confidence in the HR process and ensures that employee actions and decisions are well-documented and aligned with company policy.


Collaborative Problem-Solving​

Ultimately, the piece concludes that when both the line manager and HR Manager combine their expertise, they are better equipped to adequately address and resolve the employee's problems. This collaborative effort can significantly alleviate the "job role dilemma," potentially retaining valuable talent by finding solutions internally rather than forcing employees to look elsewhere. It underscores that employee well-being and satisfaction are shared responsibilities that benefit from a unified management approach.
 
Back
Top