Description
Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work for people and for nature.
Equator Initiative Case Studies
Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities
India
TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF
THE JEYPORE TRACT
OF ORISSA
Empowered lives.
Resilient nations.
Empowered lives.
Resilient nations.
UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES
Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work
for people and for nature. Few publications or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives evolve, the breadth of
their impacts, or how they change over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories with community practitioners
themselves guiding the narrative.
To mark its 10-year anniversary, the Equator Initiative aims to fll this gap. The following case study is one in a growing series
that details the work of Equator Prize winners – vetted and peer-reviewed best practices in community-based environmental
conservation and sustainable livelihoods. These cases are intended to inspire the policy dialogue needed to take local success
to scale, to improve the global knowledge base on local environment and development solutions, and to serve as models for
replication. Case studies are best viewed and understood with reference to ‘The Power of Local Action: Lessons from 10 Years of
the Equator Prize’, a compendium of lessons learned and policy guidance that draws from the case material.
Click on the map to visit the Equator Initiative’s searchable case study database.
Editors
Editor-in-Chief: Joseph Corcoran
Managing Editor: Oliver Hughes
Contributing Editors: Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Erin Lewis, Whitney Wilding
Contributing Writers
Edayatu Abieodun Lamptey, Erin Atwell, Toni Blackman, Jonathan Clay, Joseph Corcoran, Larissa Currado, Sarah Gordon, Oliver Hughes,
Wen-Juan Jiang, Sonal Kanabar, Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Rachael Lader, Patrick Lee, Erin Lewis, Jona Liebl, Mengning Ma,
Mary McGraw, Gabriele Orlandi, Juliana Quaresma, Peter Schecter, Martin Sommerschuh, Whitney Wilding, Luna Wu
Design
Oliver Hughes, Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Kimberly Koserowski, Erin Lewise
Acknowledgements
The Equator Initiative acknowledges with gratitude the Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa, and in particular the guidance
and inputs of Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman. All photo credits courtesy of MSSRF. Maps courtesy of CIA World Factbook and Wikipedia.
Suggested Citation
United Nations Development Programme. 2012. Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa, India. Equator Initiative Case Study Se-
ries. New York, NY.
PROJECT SUMMARY
The M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) was
concerned about the rapid depletion of rice diversity in the
Jeypore tract of the Indian state of Orissa, once the home
of the largest number of rice varieties in India. In 1998, the
foundation undertook to improve the condition of poor
farmers while revitalizing vanishing rice varieties, combining
modern and traditional approaches for the conservation,
enhancement, and sustainable use of local rice biodiversity.
While coordination of initial research, pilot studies,
and funding was handled by MSSRF, the institute has
increasingly handed control over to local actors among
the tribal communities of the Jeypore Tract through the
development of community-based organisations. These
local institutions have sustained and expanded the project’s
benefts for the district’s communities and ecosystems
through the introduction of a diverse range of sustainable
livelihood activities.
KEY FACTS
EQUATOR PRIZE WINNER: 2002
FOUNDED: 1998
LOCATION: Jeypore, Orissa, India
BENEFICIARIES: 1000 families from 16 villages
BIODIVERSITY: 83 rice landraces
3
TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF THE JEYPORE
TRACT OF ORISSA
India
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Background and Context 4
Key Activities and Innovations 6
Biodiversity Impacts 9
Socioeconomic Impacts 9
Policy Impacts 11
Sustainability 13
Replication 14
Partners 14
4
The Jeypore tract in the Indian state of Orissa (now Odisha), is con-
sidered a center of origin and diversity of Asian cultivated rice (oryza
sativa l.). Located in the district of Koraput, in southern Orissa, the
Jeypore tract comprises a highland plateau of the Eastern Ghats con-
sisting of a number of hills, with altitudes ranging between 150 and
1,500m above sea level. Fifty-two tribal communities live in Koraput,
with the Khond, Bhatada, Paroja, Bhumia and Gadaba numbering
among the largest of these. Tribal communities constitute half of the
district’s population. Approximately 84 per cent of Koraput’s popula-
tion live below the poverty line, making it one of the poorest regions
in India.
The rural, tribal communities of this region have developed and con-
served species of rice using traditional knowledge and innovative
practices to meet evolving food security and environmental needs.
Rice is cultivated across a range of agro-ecosystems, including up-
lands and lowlands, and irrigated and rain-fed landscapes. Land
types are classifed locally into fve broad categories: donger - land
on hilly slopes used for shifting cultivation; dhepa - unbunded and
bunded upland landscapes; bhatta - irrigated and rain-fed medium
lands; khala - lowlands; and jhola – deep lowlands or land located
between hills as terraces.
Within each of these land categories, numerous varieties of rice are
cultivated in three, distinct seasons: beali (autumn rice), sarrad (win-
ter rice) and dalua (summer rice). Specifc rice varieties are grown de-
pending on local preferences for characteristics such as plant height,
pigmentation of plant parts, grain shape and size, and the presence
of awns. Diferent rice varieties are also cultivated for their culinary
properties – cooked rice, popped rice, pufed rice and pressed rice;
and their palatability – aromatic or non-aromatic. The range of ge-
netic varieties and of cultural practices associated with rice have
made the Jeypore tract a globally important reserve of genetic di-
versity and accumulated traditional knowledge of rice cultivation.
Addressing a decline in genetic diversity
asdfThe latter half of the twentieth century saw a rapid erosion of
biological diversity in India. As a subset of biodiversity, agricultural
biodiversity is under particular threat, with standardized crop vari-
eties replacing native ‘landraces’ – local species varieties that have
developed naturally through adaptation to their local environments.
With the advent of India’s Green Revolution in the late 1960s, gov-
ernment agricultural extension agencies began introducing new
rice varieties to improve production and productivity in tribal areas.
In the process, local varieties were often replaced with high yield-
ing varieties, eroding the rich genetic diversity of rice. Orissa was
once the traditional home of the largest number of rice varieties of
any state in India, with more than 1,750. However, by the 1990s, the
number of local rice varieties had fallen to approximately 150.
Background and Context
5 5
To counter this trend, a movement to devise means and strategies
of in situ conservation of agrobiodiversity and associated traditional
knowledge has developed, to compliment ex situ storage and re-
trieval. Much agrobiodiversity is in the custody of tribal and rural
communities scattered in remote, mountainous and often inacces-
sible regions, which are invariably poor and economically marginal-
ized.
Concerned about the rapid depletion of rice diversity in one of its
centers of origin, the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MS-
SRF), with a pro-poor, pro-nature, pro-women mandate, began en-
deavors to revitalize vanishing rice varieties, while simultaneously
improving the conditions of poor farmers. In 1995, with a grant from
the Ramon Magsaysay Foundation, MSSRF initiated a project to col-
lect and document landraces from throughout the Jeypore tract in
an efort to protect the intellectual property rights of the district’s
tribal and rural farm families. In 1998, MSSRF, supported by the Swiss
Agency for Development and Cooperation, commenced a project
to enhance the conservation and sustainable and equitable use of
biodiversity in seven tribal villages of Koraput district. The main goal
of the project was to promote sustainable management of agrobio-
diversity and to develop procedures to recognize and reward the
contributions of tribal and rural families, in particular women, to the
conservation and enhancement of genetic diversity.
The project had the following objectives:
i. Revitalization of the on-farm conservation traditions of
rural and tribal farmers
ii. Development of innovative approaches to efectively link
biodiversity conservation and enhancement with impro
ments to the livelihoods of the rural and tribal poor
iii. Development of participatory plant breeding and conser
vation systems
iv. Integration of principles of gender and social equity into
biodiversity conservation sustainable use, through policy
research.
v. Linking primary conservation actors with markets, to
create an economic stake in conservation
vi. Ofering networking and capacity building opportunities
to tribal farm families through scientifc training and expo
sure visits
vii. Enhancement of capacities related to biodiversity
management at various levels (farmers, local communities,
non-governmental organizations, government agencies
and policy makers)
The key players in the project have been tribal and rural farming
families, locally elected ofcials, government agencies and civil soci-
ety organizations. Through self-help groups and community-based
institutions, farming families have taken leadership in the manage-
ment, conservation and sustainable use of genetic diversity of rice
landraces. Wherever feasible, members of locally elected gram pan-
chayats (village-level self-governments) take decisions on legal mat-
ters. Three dominant communities, the Paroja, Bhumia and Gadab,
have participated in the in situ farm conservation practices that now
extend to sixteen villages, and are supported by ffteen project staf.
While the overall vision has not changed dramatically since 1998,
new learning has been incorporated, most notably the use of par-
ticipatory tools.
“Empowerment of primary conservers at the community level should be given top priority for in
situ and on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity.”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
6
Key Activities and Innovations
Activities of the Jeypore tract project follow a ‘Four C’ strategy, fo-
cusing on conservation, cultivation, consumption and commerce, all
with the aim of fostering conservation and sustainable use of rice
genetic resources.
The ‘Four C’ approach
Conservation: Participatory plant breeding and on-farm, participa-
tory conservation systems are used to link tribal farmers to ex situ
gene, seed and grain banks. Documentation of farmer practices and
cataloguing of genetic resources are undertaken at feld locations,
such as the Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Cen-
tre, and are subsequently shared with a Community Gene Bank in
Chennai.
Cultivation: Farmers have been trained in improved agronomic
practices. The spread of modifed cultivation practices and genetic
varieties has been facilitated by farmer-to-farmer seed exchanges,
workshops on participatory hybridization, and the creation of feld-
level gene, seed and grain banks.
Consumption: The project has established mini hullers to reduce the
labor intensity of rice grain processing, promoted kitchen gardens
to increase household food security and nutrition, and has worked
towards the revitalization of other traditional food crop varieties, in-
cluding various species of millet, pulses and oil seeds.
Commerce: The project has attempted to introduce new varieties of
rice and improve farmers’ access to new and emerging markets.
Prior to the project’s initiation, lack of access to modern agricultural
technologies and practices hampered the ability of small-scale farm-
ing households to meet their food security needs. Yields of tradi-
tional rice varieties were typically low, and over-reliance on rice as a
food staple was high. Rice cultivation was sufcient to meet food se-
curity needs for an average of eight to nine months per year. Simple
agronomic practices have been introduced to increase the produc-
tivity of native rice varieties including seed selection and treatment
before sowing; line transplanting to aid in harvesting and weeding;
low seed rates to optimize spacing between seeds; transplanting of
seedlings; and development of seed nurseries. Organic farming has
also been encouraged through the application of farmyard manure
and bio-pesticides. Consequently, tribal farming families have ex-
perienced higher rice yields, making it possible to meet household
food requirements while also producing considerable surplus grain
for sale on the market.
Community-based grain, seed and gene banks were created for stor-
ing and lending excess grains during food shortages. Shortened to
‘Village Seed Banks’ by participating communities, these banks also
facilitate storage and exchanging of high-quality seeds of local land-
races for sowing, and ensure the long-term conservation of genetic
varieties.
Participatory methods
Participatory approaches to plant breeding and conservation have
been applied to enhance existing on-farm varieties of rice. Self-help
groups have been formed to carry out vermicomposting (compost-
ing using worms) which has contributed to enhanced agricultural
yields. Kitchen gardens, household fruit-tree planting and forest
food gardens have all been promoted to enhance food security and
nutrition, and to give families additional sources of income.
MSSRF scientists and farmers worked together through a participa-
tory process to catalog native rice landraces based on genetic char-
acteristics. A number of quantitative traits were observed based on
random samples of plants, including plant height, number of tillers,
number of panicles, average panicle length, number of flled grains
per panicle, grain fll index and harvest index.
7
Farmers were trained in the identifcation of various morphological
characters related to yield performance, and also received training
in selecting panicles with well-flled grains as seed material. After
three seasons of practical training by MSSRF scientists, farmers were
able to autonomously conduct seed selection and varietal purifca-
tion using methods such as threshing, hand winnowing, removing
undersized seeds, removing of-color seeds, and sun-drying. Data
on the quantitative traits of landraces were statistically analyzed and
the top performing varieties for each agro-ecosystem were selected.
The process of selecting and purifying native varieties helped farm-
ers to add value to seeds for sale, with purifed seeds achieving
higher prices on the market than unpurifed varieties, as illustrated
in Table 1.
All of the improved agronomic practices introduced under the
initiative practices have a high rate of uptake among farmers
participating directly in the initiative’s work, and methods may also
be replicated by non-participating neighboring farmers. Figure 1
illustrates the adoption rates of various components of improved
agronomic practices by both participating farmers and non-
participating farmers.
Target benefciaries of the project are tribal, rural and economically-
marginalized farming families, most of whom farm less than two
hectares of land. In 1998, a total of 100 farming families from eight
villages comprised the three community development blocks of
Koraput district participating in the project. This number has since
increased to nearly 1000 families from sixteen villages belonging
to fve diferent tribal communities. Knowledge has been rapidly
disseminated to other regions and farming communities through
farmer-to-farmer exchanges. Similarly, the initiative has developed a
‘Train the Trainers’ program that equips model farmers to disseminate
more complex scientifc knowledge. Village knowledge centers
use information and communications technology to promote the
project as well as for outreach and knowledge dissemination.
Table 1: The relative price of purifed and unpurifed rice varieties
Agro-ecosystem type Landraces Purifed (INR) Unpurifed (INR)
Upland
Paradhan, Matidhan, Pandakagura,
Basumati, Donder
7-8 5
Medium land Sapuri, Bodikaburi, Gathia, Muktabali 12-15 10
Lowland
Umuriachudl, Sunaseri,
Veliyan, Pathangada
12-15 10
Kalajeera 20 15
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Low seed rate (12 kg/acre)
Line sowing in raised nursery seed beds
Seed nursery area 10% of area to be transplanted
Transplanting of seedlings within 21-25 days
Line transplanting
Roughing out of mixtures
Farmyard manure (10-15 cartloads/acre)
Seed treatment before sowing
Seed selection from mother panicle
4-6 deep ploughings per harvest
Participant farmers (n=54) Non-participant farmers (n=44)
Fig. 1: The percentage of participating and non-participating farmers applying improved agronomic practices
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
8
The project has innovatively applied technology, traditional
knowledge, and management techniques. In terms of innovative
technology, the selection of seeds from mother panicles of local rice
varieties for seed purifcation has led to uniformity and stability of
yields as well as to crop improvement.
Among the most noteworthy technological innovations has been
the establishment and introduction of gene, seed and grain banks,
which have provided grain for consumption, seeds for cultivation and
genes for conservation. Participatory approaches to local rice variety
hybridization, water management in felds, and the practice of seed
soaking have also contributed signifcant technical advancements.
The project has applied traditional knowledge to seed storage,
drying and preservation, rooting these practices in local capacity
and culture. The project’s management innovations include the
building of community institutions around the gene, seed and grain
banks, for self-help groups and as the basis for knowledge-sharing
networks.
Improving livelihoods
To supplement the increased incomes from improved agronomic
practices, MSSRF encouraged the development of a number of
alternative livelihood options among Jeypore’s tribal communities.
Between 2004 and 2009, a range of livelihood projects enabled
families to diversify their sources of household income. These
activities (summarized in Table 2) focused on six villages - Chendia-
Jhiligaon, Dhola-Jhiligaon, Kaudiaguda, Kusumguda, Paknaguda
and Uduluguda, targeting the poorest tribal households. The most
successful activities promoted included large-scale vegetable
cultivation, vermicomposting, backyard poultry farming, fsh
farming, and the initiative’s ‘fve-plant’ campaign.
Table 2: Livelihood diversifcation activities initiated to diversify household incomes
Livelihood activity Number participating Year Status Results
Group vermicompost
production
16 households in three
villages
2006-07
Very successful, replicated in
other villages
Farmers use compost in their own
felds and sell surplus for cash income
Individual vermicompost
production
35 households in three
villages
2004-05 Very successful
Organic cultivation has enhanced
production and raised income
Oyster mushroom
cultivation
75 members 2007
Cultivated by groups and
individuals in three villages
Created employment and raised
incomes
Straw mushroom
cultivation
51 households in three
villages
2007
Replicated in neighboring
villages
Supplementary income source
Of-season vegetable
cultivation
61 households 2004-05
Hampered by water scarcity
during summer months
Cultivation of cash crops has
increased incomes of farm families
Group vegetable
cultivation
66 households in three
villages
2004-05
Group cultivation a success;
individual cultivation given
emphasis after two years
Created employment and raised
incomes
Individual vegetable
cultivation
91 households in three
villages
2007
Built on success of group
cultivation; technical
guidance given to farmers
Enhanced productivity of upland
areas, increased incomes
Inter-cropping of arbi
(taro) and yam
24 households in
Nuaguda village
2004-05 Used for seed multiplication
Farmers have also used for household
consumption
Fish-farming
24 households in
Nuaguda
2007 Successful
Tamarind value addition
35 households
in Nuaguda and
Gunthaguda villages
2007
Undertaken with Community
Gene Bank (MSSRF Chennai)
Tamarinds processed and kept in cold
storage for sale during peak season at
higher price
Mini rice huller
34 households in
Nuaguda
2007
Maintained by self-help
group members
Has helped households to save time
and increase income
Leaf plate stitching
8 households in
Boliguda village
2007
Groups provided with sewing
machines
Increased incomes and used to repair
clothes
Groundnut cultivation
54 households in
Boliguda village
2006
Under large scale production
and has been replicated
The largest source of income after
paddy rice
Green-gram (mungbean)
cultivation
13 households in
Nuaugda
2006 Has been successful Incomes increased
Shallow wells for
irrigation
46 households
in Nuaguda and
Gunthaguda villages
2008-09
Has beneftted vegetable
cultivation
Income generated by vegetable
cultivation
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
9
Impacts
BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS
The area under landrace cultivation, the number of diferent local
varieties used, and the number of farm families participating in the
project have all increased signifcantly across the target region since
the project was initiated. The number of rice landraces under cultiva-
tion has increased from 72 to 83, and this rate of scaling-up has con-
tinued, with 402 acres under landrace cultivation in 2009, and 978
farming families involved in the conservation and enhancement of
genetic diversity of rice species. Village Seed Banks are now operat-
ing in 17 villages, conserving a total of 24 rice landraces, in contrast
to six varieties in 2002.
These activities inherently enhance biodiversity by conserving va-
rieties of rice that would otherwise fall out of use. The farmers of
the Jeypore tract are conserving unique landraces of rice that have
adapted, largely by natural processes, to the specifc climatic, envi-
ronmental and cultural conditions of the region, thus enhancing the
region’s agrobiodiversity, and thus its general biodiversity.
Playing a leading role in the conservation of agrobiodiversity is the
Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Centre. This me-
dicinal plants garden is home to 347 ethno-medicinal plants com-
monly used by nine tribal communities in Orissa. In conjunction with
other gardens, including a women’s medicinal plants garden, the
Eastern Ghats Rare, Endangered and Threatened (RET) Plant Garden,
and artifcial, sacred groves, this center has coordinated the preser-
vation of a diverse range of native species and catalogued research
into their ethno-botanical properties.
All three agro-ecosystems in which the project operates – upland,
irrigated and rain-fed landscapes; medium land; and lowland – have
beneftted from organic farming methods. Diferent species of tra-
ditional food crops like millets, pulses and oilseeds have also been
revitalized, improving household food security and income genera-
tion, and increasing resilience to crop failures.
SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS
The target benefciaries of the initiative are farming families in Kora-
put’s tribal and rural communities, generally farming less than two
hectares of land each. MSSRF has worked to increase the livelihood
options of these families, raise their household incomes, and im-
prove household food security. Since 1998, the project has extended
to reach sixteen villages in three community development blocks in
the district, reaching a total of 4,500 individuals by 2009. As illus-
trated by Table 3, poverty levels in these villages are high, with 76
per cent of their overall population living below the poverty line.
The social and economic benefts of cultivating native rice
varieties are numerous. In addition to the cultural value placed
on inherited varieties, other benefts of traditional varieties over
high-yielding varieties may include superior taste and nutritional
value, resistance to pests and diseases, resistance to droughts and
foods, compatibility with local farming conditions, and economic
practicality as they require fewer inputs such as chemicals and
fertilizers. Generally, farmers of traditional varieties beneft from
the crops’ natural adaptation to specifc local conditions, which
allows them to be farmed more sustainably using fewer chemical
inputs. There is also a great cultural beneft to communities in the
use of their accumulated traditional knowledge of local varieties’
properties and uses.
Increasing food security
As a result of the methods introduced by the initiative, rice is now
available year-round, bridging household food defcits, where
previously, it only met families’ food needs for eight to nine months
of the year. Harvested rice complements the farming of tubers,
bamboo shoots, mushrooms and other forest products for food
security. The promotion of of-season vegetable cultivation has also
supported greater resilience to climatic changes and bolstered food
security.
Training in line transplantation has improved the productivity of
family farms by up to 25 per cent. Previously, transplantation of
seedlings took place at 45 days old, with seedling then planted
haphazardly. MSSRF training has encouraged the transplantation
of seedlings at 21-25 days, allowing 20 cm between rows and
10 cm between plants on leveled plots, and planting north to
south to allow plants to capture more sunlight. These conditions
optimize agricultural productivity and increase yields. Similarly,
MSSRF researchers determined that the widespread practice of
planting more than 80 kg of seeds per acre was adversely impacting
productivity, as plants competed for scarce nutrients. Consequently,
farmers have been encouraged to use a seed rate of 12 kg per acre,
scientifcally determined to maximize output. As line transplanting
has made it easier for farmers to weed rice crops, farmers have
increased their numbers of productive working days.
The impact of MSSRF’s participatory work in Koraput villages has
been remarkable. Average yields under improved agronomic
practices have increased dramatically in all landscapes and for all
landraces cultivated. The extent of yield improvement has varied
between 30 and 70 per cent, all of which has been achieved without
any chemical inputs and with only slight increases in the total cost
of cultivation. Variation in the extent of improvement was observed
across farmers, which could be attributed to variations between
landholdings and variation in the adoption of modifed agronomic
practices.
Initial results in 1999 were especially impressive, helping to convince
farmers of the benefts of adopting modifed agronomic practices. In
market terms, individual farmers realized yield improvements of up
to 298 per cent in lowlands, 209 per cent in medium lands, and 162
per cent in uplands. In a survey of participating and non-participating
farmers, improvements in beneft to cost ratio compared with
traditional farming practices were seen in lowland and medium land
farms, with the results for lowland farmers especially impressive; for
an average cost of INR 6,023 per hectare, yields produced INR 14,144,
for a beneft to cost ratio of 2.35.
The range of benefts brought about by the initiative has vastly
improved households’ economic situations. Participating
households have been able to sell excess grain and vegetables,
reducing incidence of farmers mortgaging their lands, selling
possessions or having to pawn belongings at high interest rates.
Farmers have also been able to invest in bullocks to plough their
land, further improving productivity. Revenues have been invested
into school fees to improve educational opportunities, community
infrastructure projects, home renovations and other improvements
in quality of life.
Of the rice varieties native to Jeypore, Kalajeera, a lowland scented
variety, has one of the highest commercial values due to its aromatic
quality and cultural importance. Kalinga Kalajeera Rice Growers
Cooperative Society was formed for the large-scale cultivation of
this variety, with support from the National Agricultural Cooperative
Federation. The increased yields and prices achieved for this variety
since 2000, illustrated in Table 4, demonstrate the success of eforts
to enhance its cultivation. In 2010-2011, the Kalinga Kalajeera
Rice Growers Cooperative Society also promoted the adoption of
the popular landraces Machhakanta and Haladichudi, which are
processed into dosa powder mix, pufed rice bodi, chuda pressed
rice mixture, and murukku. These value-added products are sold at
the local weekly market, exhibitions, and in retail shops by self-help
groups, bringing in extra income for group members. In 2010, the
combined area under cultivation of these three varieties was 261
acres.
Developing new sources of household income
During the winter and summer seasons, MSSRF assisted 116 farm
families in bringing 105 acres of land under cultivation with 18
diferent vegetables, including watermelon, tomato, pumpkin
and carrot. These families shared a total proft of INR 713,857
from cultivation, with an average household proft of INR 6,154
(approximately USD 120).
Fish farming was carried out in the rainy season using individual farm
ponds and community ponds, involving a total of 96 households. The
community purchased around 27,000 fngerlings from the hatchery
of the Orissa Fisheries Department. These were raised in village
ponds with technical guidance and regular monitoring by MSSRF.
10
Table 3: The populations and poverty levels of project
villages in 1999
Village
House-
holds
Total
population
Households
living below the
poverty line (%)
1 Boliguda 86 357 57 (66%)
2 Nuaguda 34 150 20 (59%)
3 Gunthaguda 80 299 49 (61%)
4 Tolla 102 314 82 (80%)
5 Pujariput 75 536 40 (53%)
6 Bedhaguda 16 82 16 (100%)
7 Badapar 46 228 40 (87%)
8 Patraput 135 453 106 (79%)
9 Kashiguda 71 298 64 (90%)
10 Jhalaguda 47 197 17 (36%)
11 Taliaguda 29 139 20 (69%)
12 Chemiaguda 9 54 9 (100%)
13 Balia 122 590 118 (97%)
14 Bisoiput 56 312 56 (100%)
15 Maliguda 35 289 22 (63%)
16 Kanjei 35 201 29 (83%)
TOTAL 978 4,499 746 (76%)
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
A total of 2,390 kg of fsh was harvested for a proft of INR 191,160,
giving an average proft of INR 1,991 per household (approximately
USD 39).
Vermicomposting was taken up by 86 farm families, who
constructed compost pits with tin roofs to reduce the maintenance
costs associated with traditional thatching. A total of 259 quintals of
‘vermiwash’ was produced. With each household using one quintal
in vegetable cultivation, a surplus of 173 quintals was sold at INR 400
each.
Backyard poultry farming and the “fve-plant” campaign aimed to
improve household nutritional security in 469 households. Each
household was supplied with four 21-day old chicks, with 50 per
cent of the cost being contributed by the households. These chicks
were purchased from the Central Poultry Development Organization
at the rate of INR 25 per chick. The poultry are fast-growing, reaching
one kg in weight within three months.
Finally, the ‘fve-plant’ campaign has encouraged households to
plant a package of crops – drumstick (moringa oleifera), banana, pa-
paya, green chili and yam – in backyard gardens. During the project
term, 8,800 seedlings of these plants were raised in community nurs-
eries in each of the six villages. Due to local climatic and soil condi-
tions, however, the average survival rate of these crops was only 40
per cent, with yam being the only crop that was grown successfully
across all households. This package of crops is being adjusted for fu-
ture projects.
Health benefts of native plants
Through its work in conservation of native medicinal plant spe-
cies, the Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Cen-
tre conducted a campaign on herbal prevention of malaria during
2010-2011. A herbal remedy using four native plants with medici-
nal properties – nictanthes arbor-tristis, andrographis panniculata,
azadirachata indica and tinospora cordifolia – was distributed to 800
tribal community members in Kundura. Awareness raising on herbal
remedies for malaria was also conducted in February 2011 with 316
students from nine schools. The Biju Patnaik Centre hosted demon-
strations on 21 commercially cultivated species prioritized by India’s
National Medicinal Plant Board, including the large-scale cultiva-
tion of long pepper (piper longum) and lemon grass (cymbopogon
fexuosus). The center has also established a model on home herbal
gardens to create awareness on the use of medicinal plants for pri-
mary healthcare. The center has acted as a ‘community campus’ for
raising awareness on the ethno-botanical uses of native plant spe-
cies. During 2011, 34 schools in Koraput and Nabarangpur districts
established student herbal gardens with technical guidance from
MSSRF, and the Biju Patnaik Centre supplying 4,420 medicinal plant
seedlings belonging to 26 species.
POLICY IMPACTS
Since 1990, MSSRF has played a lead role in the organization
of a series of international- and national-level workshops and
consultations on plant genetic resources, their sustainable use and
the equitable sharing of their benefts, using the activities of the
Jeypore tract farmers as a basis. The Keystone Dialogues (1988-
1991) led to the recognition of farmers’ rights within the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN FAO) framework
and also contributed signifcantly to the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD). MSSRF participated in national consultations for the
creation of a sui generis system for India, which eventually led to the
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act in 2001 and the
Biological Diversity Act in 2002, while the Chennai Platform of Action
was developed as a conscious efort to mainstream biodiversity into
the Millennium Development Goals.
11
Table 4: Kalajeera production and price, 2000-2006
Year Villages Families
Area
(acres)
Production
(quintals)
Grain Price
(INR/quintal)
Seed Price (INR/quintal)
2000 3 3 0.66 12.2 600 700
2006 27 126 100.7 1208.4 1000 1500
2008 44 159 121.9 1340.9 1500 1700
2009 29 121 98.5 1209.4 1700 2000
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
The Plant Variety Protection and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PVPFRA)
was established by the Indian government to implement the
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act. In order to
establish an efective system for the protection of plant varieties,
the rights of farmers and plant breeders, and to encourage
the development of new varieties of plants, it was considered
necessary to recognize and protect the rights of farmers involved in
conserving, improving and making available plant genetic resources
for the development of the new plant varieties. This authority has
also played a role in protecting plants breeders’ rights to stimulate
investment for research and development for the development of
new plant varieties and to facilitate the growth of the seed industry,
ensuring the availability of high quality seeds and planting material
for India’s farmers.
MSSRF has continued to assist the PVPFRA and the National
Biodiversity Authority by providing input into the development of
guidelines for the efective implementation of various provisions
of the acts. In particular, MSSRF has worked alongside the PVPFRA
with farmers from the Jeypore tract in the registration of local crop
varieties, the identifcation of agrobiodiversity hot spots, and the
sharing of expertise in agrobiodiversity, intellectual property rights,
genetic resource access and beneft sharing, and social mobilization.
In 2011, MSSRF conducted street plays and training programs on
farmers’ rights in 27 tribal villages of Boipariguda, Jeypore and
Kundura in Koraput, reaching a total population of 5,000 tribal and
rural farmers. To date, Jeypore farmers have formally registered six
native varieties with the PVPFRA.
12
“In view of the emerging challenge global environmental change including climate, emphasis
needs to be shifted towards addressing new dimensions of on-farm conservation of biodiversity
for food security, poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods.”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
13
Sustainability and Replication
SUSTAINABILITY
Since 2006, MSSRF has been carrying out its work on biodiversity in
close cooperation with the tribal villages of Koraput. Processes and
results of all projects are documented and converted into multimedia
resources, and used as training material and as tools for education
and learning. Attempts are made to facilitate replication of this body
of learning through village knowledge centers and farmer groups
that act as vehicles for sustainability.
In recognition of the initiative’s achievements, the State Government
of Orissa provided land to the Foundation for the establishment of
a Community Agrobiodiversity Centre at Koraput. This permanent
facility will include laboratories and a training center that will
contribute signifcantly to the long-term sustainability of the
project’s work.
At the grassroots level, the eforts of MSSRF and the communities
of the Jeypore tract have been institutionalized through the
development of community-based organizations that are carrying
out projects with increasing autonomy from the Foundation. These
include the Panchabati Grama Unnayana Samiti (PGUS), Central
Village Committees, the Kalinga Kalajeera Seed Growers Society
(KKSGS), village seed banks, self-help groups, and the project’s
central management committee. These local institutions have the
ability to sustain, enhance and expand the project’s environmental
benefts throughout the district’s communities and ecosystems.
The Panchabati Grama Unnayan Samiti is a community-based
organization bringing together the sixteen target communities. The
organization is funded by interest earned on the USD 35,000 Equator
Prize, awarded to MSSRF in 2002. This interest totaled INR 300,000
(USD 5,855) in 2010-2011, and has been reinvested by communities
in local resource development, including the renovation of village
and farm ponds to conserve rainwater for agriculture, household
use and fsh farming. The organization won the Genome Saviour
Award in 2009-10 and six representatives of the sixteen villages were
honored with a check for INR 1,000,000 (USD 19,510) in a ceremony
in New Delhi in recognition of their contribution to the conservation
and promotion of local genetic resources in the feld of biodiversity.
Central Village Committees have been created in all of the project’s
target villages, with executive body members elected by villagers for
a one-year periods. These committees are responsible for monitoring
the work of projects in the villages, and providing suggestions for
improvement, and play a key role in village resource management.
All social, technical, and political conficts are placed before the
committee for resolution. Each committee manages a Village
Development Fund into which community members pay individual
contributions ranging between IDR 5-30 each month. The funds are
designed to meet emergency needs and provide fnancial assistance
to individuals or groups. All village funds are formalized and linked
to banks for availing loans. In 2010-2011, IDR 56,098 was collected
from 958 households.
The Kalinga Kalajeera Rice Growers Cooperative Society has taken on
considerable responsibility in recent years, building on MSSRF’s work
in promoting the cultivation of commercial Kalajeera, Machhakanta
and Haladichudi rice varieties. The Society has conducted farmer-to-
farmer extension programs to encourage cultivation of these crops,
bringing substantial economic rewards to its members. A total of
thirty self-help groups have also been established. These groups
take regular deposits from members and are able to take out loans
to invest in activities including goat rearing, agricultural activities,
fsh farming and mushroom cultivation.
Finally, village seed banks have been replicated in all target
communities, focusing on conserving traditional landraces of
rice, ragi, horse-gram and green-gram, with grains collected from
community members. These local institutions are linked to the
MSSRF Community Gene Bank in Chennai. The range of local
institutions established has helped to devolve the management
“Communities should pool and utilize their local bio-resources and form local institutions for
ensuring long term sustainability. Capacity building is another important component to sustain
a project for a long term. Building a corpus fund is essential for improved management and
continuity”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
14 14
of the project to the grassroots level, avoiding overall dependence
on any one entity, while substantially building local capacity. These
institutions underpin the work of MSSRF and have been key drivers
of the initiative’s growth, expansion and sustainability.
REPLICATION
Since the initiative was begun, the area under landrace cultivation,
the number of diferent local varieties in use, and the number of farm
families participating in the project have all increased signifcantly
across the target villages. In 1998, a total of 100 farming families
from eight villages in Koraput district were involved in the initiative’s
activities. This number has since increased to nearly 1,000 families
from sixteen villages, encompassing members of fve diferent tribal
communities. The area under cultivation increased from 278.5 acres
to 366 acres between 2000 and 2005; the number of landraces being
cultivated increased from 72 to 83 in the same period, while the
number of participating farm families rose from 250 to 390.
This rate of scaling-up has continued, and by 2009, the area under
landraces had increased to 402 acres and involved 978 farm
families. Village Seed Banks are now operating in seventeen villages,
conserving a total of 24 rice landraces, up from six varieties in 2002.
Knowledge has been disseminated rapidly to other regions and
farming communities through farmer-to-farmer exchanges, while
a ‘Train the Trainers’ program has equipped model farmers in the
dissemination of more complex scientifc knowledge. The project is
promoted through village knowledge centers, which use information
and communications technology to promote the project as well as
for outreach and knowledge dissemination. Training modules have
been created for the extension of improved agronomic practices.
Knowledge generated by the initiative is extensively disseminated to
other stakeholders during formal meetings, presentations, websites
and scientifc and other publications. Farmer-to-farmer knowledge
difusion also occurs organically during visits to local markets, as
well as through interaction during religious and social functions.
NGOs in Kalahandi and Malkangiri districts have also played a role
in replication, while the State Government of Orissa is in the process
of funding local biodiversity projects based on the knowledge and
experiences of MSSRF projects in Koraput.
PARTNERS
The project’s leading partners include the M. S. Swaminathan
Research Foundation (MSSRF), the Swiss Agency for Development
and Cooperation (SDC), United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) Equator Initiative and the Plant Variety Protection and
Farmers Rights Authority.
Beyond these organizations, a wider range of stakeholders are
often brought together by MSSRF for knowledge exchanges and
policy development. For instance, a pilot study on conservation
and the adaptive management of globally important agricultural
heritage systems was carried out during 2010-2011 with support
from UN FAO. This involved a one-day national consultation in
Jeypore in November 2010. Regional consultations for this were
conducted with participants from national institutions such as
the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority,
the Central Rice Research Institute, the National Bureau of Plant
Genetic Resources; state institutions such as the Orissa University
of Agriculture and Technology; and members of NGOs, community-
based organizations, farmers, local government and Panchayat Raj
Institution members of Koraput district.
Click the thumbnails below to read more case studies like this:
FURTHER REFERENCE
• Hooper, M., Jafry, R., Marolla, M., and Phan, J. Scaling up Community Eforts to Reach the MDGs: An Assessment of the Experience from the
Equator Prize. UNDP. http://www.equatorinitiative.org/images/stories/2002winners/Tribal_Jeypore/scalingup.pdf
• Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa Photo Story (Vimeo) http://vimeo.com/15672408
Equator Initiative
Environment and Energy Group
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
304 East 45th Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: +1 212 906-6691
Fax: +1 212 906-6642
www.equatorinitiative.org
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and con-
necting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life.
The Equator Initiative brings together the United Nations, governments, civil society, businesses and grassroots organizations
to recognize and advance local sustainable development solutions for people, nature and resilient communities.
©2012 by Equator Initiative
All rights reserved
doc_124148406.pdf
Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work for people and for nature.
Equator Initiative Case Studies
Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities
India
TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF
THE JEYPORE TRACT
OF ORISSA
Empowered lives.
Resilient nations.
Empowered lives.
Resilient nations.
UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES
Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work
for people and for nature. Few publications or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives evolve, the breadth of
their impacts, or how they change over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories with community practitioners
themselves guiding the narrative.
To mark its 10-year anniversary, the Equator Initiative aims to fll this gap. The following case study is one in a growing series
that details the work of Equator Prize winners – vetted and peer-reviewed best practices in community-based environmental
conservation and sustainable livelihoods. These cases are intended to inspire the policy dialogue needed to take local success
to scale, to improve the global knowledge base on local environment and development solutions, and to serve as models for
replication. Case studies are best viewed and understood with reference to ‘The Power of Local Action: Lessons from 10 Years of
the Equator Prize’, a compendium of lessons learned and policy guidance that draws from the case material.
Click on the map to visit the Equator Initiative’s searchable case study database.
Editors
Editor-in-Chief: Joseph Corcoran
Managing Editor: Oliver Hughes
Contributing Editors: Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Erin Lewis, Whitney Wilding
Contributing Writers
Edayatu Abieodun Lamptey, Erin Atwell, Toni Blackman, Jonathan Clay, Joseph Corcoran, Larissa Currado, Sarah Gordon, Oliver Hughes,
Wen-Juan Jiang, Sonal Kanabar, Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Rachael Lader, Patrick Lee, Erin Lewis, Jona Liebl, Mengning Ma,
Mary McGraw, Gabriele Orlandi, Juliana Quaresma, Peter Schecter, Martin Sommerschuh, Whitney Wilding, Luna Wu
Design
Oliver Hughes, Dearbhla Keegan, Matthew Konsa, Kimberly Koserowski, Erin Lewise
Acknowledgements
The Equator Initiative acknowledges with gratitude the Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa, and in particular the guidance
and inputs of Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman. All photo credits courtesy of MSSRF. Maps courtesy of CIA World Factbook and Wikipedia.
Suggested Citation
United Nations Development Programme. 2012. Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa, India. Equator Initiative Case Study Se-
ries. New York, NY.
PROJECT SUMMARY
The M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) was
concerned about the rapid depletion of rice diversity in the
Jeypore tract of the Indian state of Orissa, once the home
of the largest number of rice varieties in India. In 1998, the
foundation undertook to improve the condition of poor
farmers while revitalizing vanishing rice varieties, combining
modern and traditional approaches for the conservation,
enhancement, and sustainable use of local rice biodiversity.
While coordination of initial research, pilot studies,
and funding was handled by MSSRF, the institute has
increasingly handed control over to local actors among
the tribal communities of the Jeypore Tract through the
development of community-based organisations. These
local institutions have sustained and expanded the project’s
benefts for the district’s communities and ecosystems
through the introduction of a diverse range of sustainable
livelihood activities.
KEY FACTS
EQUATOR PRIZE WINNER: 2002
FOUNDED: 1998
LOCATION: Jeypore, Orissa, India
BENEFICIARIES: 1000 families from 16 villages
BIODIVERSITY: 83 rice landraces
3
TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF THE JEYPORE
TRACT OF ORISSA
India
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Background and Context 4
Key Activities and Innovations 6
Biodiversity Impacts 9
Socioeconomic Impacts 9
Policy Impacts 11
Sustainability 13
Replication 14
Partners 14
4
The Jeypore tract in the Indian state of Orissa (now Odisha), is con-
sidered a center of origin and diversity of Asian cultivated rice (oryza
sativa l.). Located in the district of Koraput, in southern Orissa, the
Jeypore tract comprises a highland plateau of the Eastern Ghats con-
sisting of a number of hills, with altitudes ranging between 150 and
1,500m above sea level. Fifty-two tribal communities live in Koraput,
with the Khond, Bhatada, Paroja, Bhumia and Gadaba numbering
among the largest of these. Tribal communities constitute half of the
district’s population. Approximately 84 per cent of Koraput’s popula-
tion live below the poverty line, making it one of the poorest regions
in India.
The rural, tribal communities of this region have developed and con-
served species of rice using traditional knowledge and innovative
practices to meet evolving food security and environmental needs.
Rice is cultivated across a range of agro-ecosystems, including up-
lands and lowlands, and irrigated and rain-fed landscapes. Land
types are classifed locally into fve broad categories: donger - land
on hilly slopes used for shifting cultivation; dhepa - unbunded and
bunded upland landscapes; bhatta - irrigated and rain-fed medium
lands; khala - lowlands; and jhola – deep lowlands or land located
between hills as terraces.
Within each of these land categories, numerous varieties of rice are
cultivated in three, distinct seasons: beali (autumn rice), sarrad (win-
ter rice) and dalua (summer rice). Specifc rice varieties are grown de-
pending on local preferences for characteristics such as plant height,
pigmentation of plant parts, grain shape and size, and the presence
of awns. Diferent rice varieties are also cultivated for their culinary
properties – cooked rice, popped rice, pufed rice and pressed rice;
and their palatability – aromatic or non-aromatic. The range of ge-
netic varieties and of cultural practices associated with rice have
made the Jeypore tract a globally important reserve of genetic di-
versity and accumulated traditional knowledge of rice cultivation.
Addressing a decline in genetic diversity
asdfThe latter half of the twentieth century saw a rapid erosion of
biological diversity in India. As a subset of biodiversity, agricultural
biodiversity is under particular threat, with standardized crop vari-
eties replacing native ‘landraces’ – local species varieties that have
developed naturally through adaptation to their local environments.
With the advent of India’s Green Revolution in the late 1960s, gov-
ernment agricultural extension agencies began introducing new
rice varieties to improve production and productivity in tribal areas.
In the process, local varieties were often replaced with high yield-
ing varieties, eroding the rich genetic diversity of rice. Orissa was
once the traditional home of the largest number of rice varieties of
any state in India, with more than 1,750. However, by the 1990s, the
number of local rice varieties had fallen to approximately 150.
Background and Context
5 5
To counter this trend, a movement to devise means and strategies
of in situ conservation of agrobiodiversity and associated traditional
knowledge has developed, to compliment ex situ storage and re-
trieval. Much agrobiodiversity is in the custody of tribal and rural
communities scattered in remote, mountainous and often inacces-
sible regions, which are invariably poor and economically marginal-
ized.
Concerned about the rapid depletion of rice diversity in one of its
centers of origin, the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MS-
SRF), with a pro-poor, pro-nature, pro-women mandate, began en-
deavors to revitalize vanishing rice varieties, while simultaneously
improving the conditions of poor farmers. In 1995, with a grant from
the Ramon Magsaysay Foundation, MSSRF initiated a project to col-
lect and document landraces from throughout the Jeypore tract in
an efort to protect the intellectual property rights of the district’s
tribal and rural farm families. In 1998, MSSRF, supported by the Swiss
Agency for Development and Cooperation, commenced a project
to enhance the conservation and sustainable and equitable use of
biodiversity in seven tribal villages of Koraput district. The main goal
of the project was to promote sustainable management of agrobio-
diversity and to develop procedures to recognize and reward the
contributions of tribal and rural families, in particular women, to the
conservation and enhancement of genetic diversity.
The project had the following objectives:
i. Revitalization of the on-farm conservation traditions of
rural and tribal farmers
ii. Development of innovative approaches to efectively link
biodiversity conservation and enhancement with impro
ments to the livelihoods of the rural and tribal poor
iii. Development of participatory plant breeding and conser
vation systems
iv. Integration of principles of gender and social equity into
biodiversity conservation sustainable use, through policy
research.
v. Linking primary conservation actors with markets, to
create an economic stake in conservation
vi. Ofering networking and capacity building opportunities
to tribal farm families through scientifc training and expo
sure visits
vii. Enhancement of capacities related to biodiversity
management at various levels (farmers, local communities,
non-governmental organizations, government agencies
and policy makers)
The key players in the project have been tribal and rural farming
families, locally elected ofcials, government agencies and civil soci-
ety organizations. Through self-help groups and community-based
institutions, farming families have taken leadership in the manage-
ment, conservation and sustainable use of genetic diversity of rice
landraces. Wherever feasible, members of locally elected gram pan-
chayats (village-level self-governments) take decisions on legal mat-
ters. Three dominant communities, the Paroja, Bhumia and Gadab,
have participated in the in situ farm conservation practices that now
extend to sixteen villages, and are supported by ffteen project staf.
While the overall vision has not changed dramatically since 1998,
new learning has been incorporated, most notably the use of par-
ticipatory tools.
“Empowerment of primary conservers at the community level should be given top priority for in
situ and on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity.”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
6
Key Activities and Innovations
Activities of the Jeypore tract project follow a ‘Four C’ strategy, fo-
cusing on conservation, cultivation, consumption and commerce, all
with the aim of fostering conservation and sustainable use of rice
genetic resources.
The ‘Four C’ approach
Conservation: Participatory plant breeding and on-farm, participa-
tory conservation systems are used to link tribal farmers to ex situ
gene, seed and grain banks. Documentation of farmer practices and
cataloguing of genetic resources are undertaken at feld locations,
such as the Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Cen-
tre, and are subsequently shared with a Community Gene Bank in
Chennai.
Cultivation: Farmers have been trained in improved agronomic
practices. The spread of modifed cultivation practices and genetic
varieties has been facilitated by farmer-to-farmer seed exchanges,
workshops on participatory hybridization, and the creation of feld-
level gene, seed and grain banks.
Consumption: The project has established mini hullers to reduce the
labor intensity of rice grain processing, promoted kitchen gardens
to increase household food security and nutrition, and has worked
towards the revitalization of other traditional food crop varieties, in-
cluding various species of millet, pulses and oil seeds.
Commerce: The project has attempted to introduce new varieties of
rice and improve farmers’ access to new and emerging markets.
Prior to the project’s initiation, lack of access to modern agricultural
technologies and practices hampered the ability of small-scale farm-
ing households to meet their food security needs. Yields of tradi-
tional rice varieties were typically low, and over-reliance on rice as a
food staple was high. Rice cultivation was sufcient to meet food se-
curity needs for an average of eight to nine months per year. Simple
agronomic practices have been introduced to increase the produc-
tivity of native rice varieties including seed selection and treatment
before sowing; line transplanting to aid in harvesting and weeding;
low seed rates to optimize spacing between seeds; transplanting of
seedlings; and development of seed nurseries. Organic farming has
also been encouraged through the application of farmyard manure
and bio-pesticides. Consequently, tribal farming families have ex-
perienced higher rice yields, making it possible to meet household
food requirements while also producing considerable surplus grain
for sale on the market.
Community-based grain, seed and gene banks were created for stor-
ing and lending excess grains during food shortages. Shortened to
‘Village Seed Banks’ by participating communities, these banks also
facilitate storage and exchanging of high-quality seeds of local land-
races for sowing, and ensure the long-term conservation of genetic
varieties.
Participatory methods
Participatory approaches to plant breeding and conservation have
been applied to enhance existing on-farm varieties of rice. Self-help
groups have been formed to carry out vermicomposting (compost-
ing using worms) which has contributed to enhanced agricultural
yields. Kitchen gardens, household fruit-tree planting and forest
food gardens have all been promoted to enhance food security and
nutrition, and to give families additional sources of income.
MSSRF scientists and farmers worked together through a participa-
tory process to catalog native rice landraces based on genetic char-
acteristics. A number of quantitative traits were observed based on
random samples of plants, including plant height, number of tillers,
number of panicles, average panicle length, number of flled grains
per panicle, grain fll index and harvest index.
7
Farmers were trained in the identifcation of various morphological
characters related to yield performance, and also received training
in selecting panicles with well-flled grains as seed material. After
three seasons of practical training by MSSRF scientists, farmers were
able to autonomously conduct seed selection and varietal purifca-
tion using methods such as threshing, hand winnowing, removing
undersized seeds, removing of-color seeds, and sun-drying. Data
on the quantitative traits of landraces were statistically analyzed and
the top performing varieties for each agro-ecosystem were selected.
The process of selecting and purifying native varieties helped farm-
ers to add value to seeds for sale, with purifed seeds achieving
higher prices on the market than unpurifed varieties, as illustrated
in Table 1.
All of the improved agronomic practices introduced under the
initiative practices have a high rate of uptake among farmers
participating directly in the initiative’s work, and methods may also
be replicated by non-participating neighboring farmers. Figure 1
illustrates the adoption rates of various components of improved
agronomic practices by both participating farmers and non-
participating farmers.
Target benefciaries of the project are tribal, rural and economically-
marginalized farming families, most of whom farm less than two
hectares of land. In 1998, a total of 100 farming families from eight
villages comprised the three community development blocks of
Koraput district participating in the project. This number has since
increased to nearly 1000 families from sixteen villages belonging
to fve diferent tribal communities. Knowledge has been rapidly
disseminated to other regions and farming communities through
farmer-to-farmer exchanges. Similarly, the initiative has developed a
‘Train the Trainers’ program that equips model farmers to disseminate
more complex scientifc knowledge. Village knowledge centers
use information and communications technology to promote the
project as well as for outreach and knowledge dissemination.
Table 1: The relative price of purifed and unpurifed rice varieties
Agro-ecosystem type Landraces Purifed (INR) Unpurifed (INR)
Upland
Paradhan, Matidhan, Pandakagura,
Basumati, Donder
7-8 5
Medium land Sapuri, Bodikaburi, Gathia, Muktabali 12-15 10
Lowland
Umuriachudl, Sunaseri,
Veliyan, Pathangada
12-15 10
Kalajeera 20 15
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Low seed rate (12 kg/acre)
Line sowing in raised nursery seed beds
Seed nursery area 10% of area to be transplanted
Transplanting of seedlings within 21-25 days
Line transplanting
Roughing out of mixtures
Farmyard manure (10-15 cartloads/acre)
Seed treatment before sowing
Seed selection from mother panicle
4-6 deep ploughings per harvest
Participant farmers (n=54) Non-participant farmers (n=44)
Fig. 1: The percentage of participating and non-participating farmers applying improved agronomic practices
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
8
The project has innovatively applied technology, traditional
knowledge, and management techniques. In terms of innovative
technology, the selection of seeds from mother panicles of local rice
varieties for seed purifcation has led to uniformity and stability of
yields as well as to crop improvement.
Among the most noteworthy technological innovations has been
the establishment and introduction of gene, seed and grain banks,
which have provided grain for consumption, seeds for cultivation and
genes for conservation. Participatory approaches to local rice variety
hybridization, water management in felds, and the practice of seed
soaking have also contributed signifcant technical advancements.
The project has applied traditional knowledge to seed storage,
drying and preservation, rooting these practices in local capacity
and culture. The project’s management innovations include the
building of community institutions around the gene, seed and grain
banks, for self-help groups and as the basis for knowledge-sharing
networks.
Improving livelihoods
To supplement the increased incomes from improved agronomic
practices, MSSRF encouraged the development of a number of
alternative livelihood options among Jeypore’s tribal communities.
Between 2004 and 2009, a range of livelihood projects enabled
families to diversify their sources of household income. These
activities (summarized in Table 2) focused on six villages - Chendia-
Jhiligaon, Dhola-Jhiligaon, Kaudiaguda, Kusumguda, Paknaguda
and Uduluguda, targeting the poorest tribal households. The most
successful activities promoted included large-scale vegetable
cultivation, vermicomposting, backyard poultry farming, fsh
farming, and the initiative’s ‘fve-plant’ campaign.
Table 2: Livelihood diversifcation activities initiated to diversify household incomes
Livelihood activity Number participating Year Status Results
Group vermicompost
production
16 households in three
villages
2006-07
Very successful, replicated in
other villages
Farmers use compost in their own
felds and sell surplus for cash income
Individual vermicompost
production
35 households in three
villages
2004-05 Very successful
Organic cultivation has enhanced
production and raised income
Oyster mushroom
cultivation
75 members 2007
Cultivated by groups and
individuals in three villages
Created employment and raised
incomes
Straw mushroom
cultivation
51 households in three
villages
2007
Replicated in neighboring
villages
Supplementary income source
Of-season vegetable
cultivation
61 households 2004-05
Hampered by water scarcity
during summer months
Cultivation of cash crops has
increased incomes of farm families
Group vegetable
cultivation
66 households in three
villages
2004-05
Group cultivation a success;
individual cultivation given
emphasis after two years
Created employment and raised
incomes
Individual vegetable
cultivation
91 households in three
villages
2007
Built on success of group
cultivation; technical
guidance given to farmers
Enhanced productivity of upland
areas, increased incomes
Inter-cropping of arbi
(taro) and yam
24 households in
Nuaguda village
2004-05 Used for seed multiplication
Farmers have also used for household
consumption
Fish-farming
24 households in
Nuaguda
2007 Successful
Tamarind value addition
35 households
in Nuaguda and
Gunthaguda villages
2007
Undertaken with Community
Gene Bank (MSSRF Chennai)
Tamarinds processed and kept in cold
storage for sale during peak season at
higher price
Mini rice huller
34 households in
Nuaguda
2007
Maintained by self-help
group members
Has helped households to save time
and increase income
Leaf plate stitching
8 households in
Boliguda village
2007
Groups provided with sewing
machines
Increased incomes and used to repair
clothes
Groundnut cultivation
54 households in
Boliguda village
2006
Under large scale production
and has been replicated
The largest source of income after
paddy rice
Green-gram (mungbean)
cultivation
13 households in
Nuaugda
2006 Has been successful Incomes increased
Shallow wells for
irrigation
46 households
in Nuaguda and
Gunthaguda villages
2008-09
Has beneftted vegetable
cultivation
Income generated by vegetable
cultivation
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
9
Impacts
BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS
The area under landrace cultivation, the number of diferent local
varieties used, and the number of farm families participating in the
project have all increased signifcantly across the target region since
the project was initiated. The number of rice landraces under cultiva-
tion has increased from 72 to 83, and this rate of scaling-up has con-
tinued, with 402 acres under landrace cultivation in 2009, and 978
farming families involved in the conservation and enhancement of
genetic diversity of rice species. Village Seed Banks are now operat-
ing in 17 villages, conserving a total of 24 rice landraces, in contrast
to six varieties in 2002.
These activities inherently enhance biodiversity by conserving va-
rieties of rice that would otherwise fall out of use. The farmers of
the Jeypore tract are conserving unique landraces of rice that have
adapted, largely by natural processes, to the specifc climatic, envi-
ronmental and cultural conditions of the region, thus enhancing the
region’s agrobiodiversity, and thus its general biodiversity.
Playing a leading role in the conservation of agrobiodiversity is the
Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Centre. This me-
dicinal plants garden is home to 347 ethno-medicinal plants com-
monly used by nine tribal communities in Orissa. In conjunction with
other gardens, including a women’s medicinal plants garden, the
Eastern Ghats Rare, Endangered and Threatened (RET) Plant Garden,
and artifcial, sacred groves, this center has coordinated the preser-
vation of a diverse range of native species and catalogued research
into their ethno-botanical properties.
All three agro-ecosystems in which the project operates – upland,
irrigated and rain-fed landscapes; medium land; and lowland – have
beneftted from organic farming methods. Diferent species of tra-
ditional food crops like millets, pulses and oilseeds have also been
revitalized, improving household food security and income genera-
tion, and increasing resilience to crop failures.
SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS
The target benefciaries of the initiative are farming families in Kora-
put’s tribal and rural communities, generally farming less than two
hectares of land each. MSSRF has worked to increase the livelihood
options of these families, raise their household incomes, and im-
prove household food security. Since 1998, the project has extended
to reach sixteen villages in three community development blocks in
the district, reaching a total of 4,500 individuals by 2009. As illus-
trated by Table 3, poverty levels in these villages are high, with 76
per cent of their overall population living below the poverty line.
The social and economic benefts of cultivating native rice
varieties are numerous. In addition to the cultural value placed
on inherited varieties, other benefts of traditional varieties over
high-yielding varieties may include superior taste and nutritional
value, resistance to pests and diseases, resistance to droughts and
foods, compatibility with local farming conditions, and economic
practicality as they require fewer inputs such as chemicals and
fertilizers. Generally, farmers of traditional varieties beneft from
the crops’ natural adaptation to specifc local conditions, which
allows them to be farmed more sustainably using fewer chemical
inputs. There is also a great cultural beneft to communities in the
use of their accumulated traditional knowledge of local varieties’
properties and uses.
Increasing food security
As a result of the methods introduced by the initiative, rice is now
available year-round, bridging household food defcits, where
previously, it only met families’ food needs for eight to nine months
of the year. Harvested rice complements the farming of tubers,
bamboo shoots, mushrooms and other forest products for food
security. The promotion of of-season vegetable cultivation has also
supported greater resilience to climatic changes and bolstered food
security.
Training in line transplantation has improved the productivity of
family farms by up to 25 per cent. Previously, transplantation of
seedlings took place at 45 days old, with seedling then planted
haphazardly. MSSRF training has encouraged the transplantation
of seedlings at 21-25 days, allowing 20 cm between rows and
10 cm between plants on leveled plots, and planting north to
south to allow plants to capture more sunlight. These conditions
optimize agricultural productivity and increase yields. Similarly,
MSSRF researchers determined that the widespread practice of
planting more than 80 kg of seeds per acre was adversely impacting
productivity, as plants competed for scarce nutrients. Consequently,
farmers have been encouraged to use a seed rate of 12 kg per acre,
scientifcally determined to maximize output. As line transplanting
has made it easier for farmers to weed rice crops, farmers have
increased their numbers of productive working days.
The impact of MSSRF’s participatory work in Koraput villages has
been remarkable. Average yields under improved agronomic
practices have increased dramatically in all landscapes and for all
landraces cultivated. The extent of yield improvement has varied
between 30 and 70 per cent, all of which has been achieved without
any chemical inputs and with only slight increases in the total cost
of cultivation. Variation in the extent of improvement was observed
across farmers, which could be attributed to variations between
landholdings and variation in the adoption of modifed agronomic
practices.
Initial results in 1999 were especially impressive, helping to convince
farmers of the benefts of adopting modifed agronomic practices. In
market terms, individual farmers realized yield improvements of up
to 298 per cent in lowlands, 209 per cent in medium lands, and 162
per cent in uplands. In a survey of participating and non-participating
farmers, improvements in beneft to cost ratio compared with
traditional farming practices were seen in lowland and medium land
farms, with the results for lowland farmers especially impressive; for
an average cost of INR 6,023 per hectare, yields produced INR 14,144,
for a beneft to cost ratio of 2.35.
The range of benefts brought about by the initiative has vastly
improved households’ economic situations. Participating
households have been able to sell excess grain and vegetables,
reducing incidence of farmers mortgaging their lands, selling
possessions or having to pawn belongings at high interest rates.
Farmers have also been able to invest in bullocks to plough their
land, further improving productivity. Revenues have been invested
into school fees to improve educational opportunities, community
infrastructure projects, home renovations and other improvements
in quality of life.
Of the rice varieties native to Jeypore, Kalajeera, a lowland scented
variety, has one of the highest commercial values due to its aromatic
quality and cultural importance. Kalinga Kalajeera Rice Growers
Cooperative Society was formed for the large-scale cultivation of
this variety, with support from the National Agricultural Cooperative
Federation. The increased yields and prices achieved for this variety
since 2000, illustrated in Table 4, demonstrate the success of eforts
to enhance its cultivation. In 2010-2011, the Kalinga Kalajeera
Rice Growers Cooperative Society also promoted the adoption of
the popular landraces Machhakanta and Haladichudi, which are
processed into dosa powder mix, pufed rice bodi, chuda pressed
rice mixture, and murukku. These value-added products are sold at
the local weekly market, exhibitions, and in retail shops by self-help
groups, bringing in extra income for group members. In 2010, the
combined area under cultivation of these three varieties was 261
acres.
Developing new sources of household income
During the winter and summer seasons, MSSRF assisted 116 farm
families in bringing 105 acres of land under cultivation with 18
diferent vegetables, including watermelon, tomato, pumpkin
and carrot. These families shared a total proft of INR 713,857
from cultivation, with an average household proft of INR 6,154
(approximately USD 120).
Fish farming was carried out in the rainy season using individual farm
ponds and community ponds, involving a total of 96 households. The
community purchased around 27,000 fngerlings from the hatchery
of the Orissa Fisheries Department. These were raised in village
ponds with technical guidance and regular monitoring by MSSRF.
10
Table 3: The populations and poverty levels of project
villages in 1999
Village
House-
holds
Total
population
Households
living below the
poverty line (%)
1 Boliguda 86 357 57 (66%)
2 Nuaguda 34 150 20 (59%)
3 Gunthaguda 80 299 49 (61%)
4 Tolla 102 314 82 (80%)
5 Pujariput 75 536 40 (53%)
6 Bedhaguda 16 82 16 (100%)
7 Badapar 46 228 40 (87%)
8 Patraput 135 453 106 (79%)
9 Kashiguda 71 298 64 (90%)
10 Jhalaguda 47 197 17 (36%)
11 Taliaguda 29 139 20 (69%)
12 Chemiaguda 9 54 9 (100%)
13 Balia 122 590 118 (97%)
14 Bisoiput 56 312 56 (100%)
15 Maliguda 35 289 22 (63%)
16 Kanjei 35 201 29 (83%)
TOTAL 978 4,499 746 (76%)
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
A total of 2,390 kg of fsh was harvested for a proft of INR 191,160,
giving an average proft of INR 1,991 per household (approximately
USD 39).
Vermicomposting was taken up by 86 farm families, who
constructed compost pits with tin roofs to reduce the maintenance
costs associated with traditional thatching. A total of 259 quintals of
‘vermiwash’ was produced. With each household using one quintal
in vegetable cultivation, a surplus of 173 quintals was sold at INR 400
each.
Backyard poultry farming and the “fve-plant” campaign aimed to
improve household nutritional security in 469 households. Each
household was supplied with four 21-day old chicks, with 50 per
cent of the cost being contributed by the households. These chicks
were purchased from the Central Poultry Development Organization
at the rate of INR 25 per chick. The poultry are fast-growing, reaching
one kg in weight within three months.
Finally, the ‘fve-plant’ campaign has encouraged households to
plant a package of crops – drumstick (moringa oleifera), banana, pa-
paya, green chili and yam – in backyard gardens. During the project
term, 8,800 seedlings of these plants were raised in community nurs-
eries in each of the six villages. Due to local climatic and soil condi-
tions, however, the average survival rate of these crops was only 40
per cent, with yam being the only crop that was grown successfully
across all households. This package of crops is being adjusted for fu-
ture projects.
Health benefts of native plants
Through its work in conservation of native medicinal plant spe-
cies, the Biju Patnaik Medicinal Plants Garden and Research Cen-
tre conducted a campaign on herbal prevention of malaria during
2010-2011. A herbal remedy using four native plants with medici-
nal properties – nictanthes arbor-tristis, andrographis panniculata,
azadirachata indica and tinospora cordifolia – was distributed to 800
tribal community members in Kundura. Awareness raising on herbal
remedies for malaria was also conducted in February 2011 with 316
students from nine schools. The Biju Patnaik Centre hosted demon-
strations on 21 commercially cultivated species prioritized by India’s
National Medicinal Plant Board, including the large-scale cultiva-
tion of long pepper (piper longum) and lemon grass (cymbopogon
fexuosus). The center has also established a model on home herbal
gardens to create awareness on the use of medicinal plants for pri-
mary healthcare. The center has acted as a ‘community campus’ for
raising awareness on the ethno-botanical uses of native plant spe-
cies. During 2011, 34 schools in Koraput and Nabarangpur districts
established student herbal gardens with technical guidance from
MSSRF, and the Biju Patnaik Centre supplying 4,420 medicinal plant
seedlings belonging to 26 species.
POLICY IMPACTS
Since 1990, MSSRF has played a lead role in the organization
of a series of international- and national-level workshops and
consultations on plant genetic resources, their sustainable use and
the equitable sharing of their benefts, using the activities of the
Jeypore tract farmers as a basis. The Keystone Dialogues (1988-
1991) led to the recognition of farmers’ rights within the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN FAO) framework
and also contributed signifcantly to the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD). MSSRF participated in national consultations for the
creation of a sui generis system for India, which eventually led to the
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act in 2001 and the
Biological Diversity Act in 2002, while the Chennai Platform of Action
was developed as a conscious efort to mainstream biodiversity into
the Millennium Development Goals.
11
Table 4: Kalajeera production and price, 2000-2006
Year Villages Families
Area
(acres)
Production
(quintals)
Grain Price
(INR/quintal)
Seed Price (INR/quintal)
2000 3 3 0.66 12.2 600 700
2006 27 126 100.7 1208.4 1000 1500
2008 44 159 121.9 1340.9 1500 1700
2009 29 121 98.5 1209.4 1700 2000
Source: M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, 2010-2011 Annual Report
The Plant Variety Protection and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PVPFRA)
was established by the Indian government to implement the
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act. In order to
establish an efective system for the protection of plant varieties,
the rights of farmers and plant breeders, and to encourage
the development of new varieties of plants, it was considered
necessary to recognize and protect the rights of farmers involved in
conserving, improving and making available plant genetic resources
for the development of the new plant varieties. This authority has
also played a role in protecting plants breeders’ rights to stimulate
investment for research and development for the development of
new plant varieties and to facilitate the growth of the seed industry,
ensuring the availability of high quality seeds and planting material
for India’s farmers.
MSSRF has continued to assist the PVPFRA and the National
Biodiversity Authority by providing input into the development of
guidelines for the efective implementation of various provisions
of the acts. In particular, MSSRF has worked alongside the PVPFRA
with farmers from the Jeypore tract in the registration of local crop
varieties, the identifcation of agrobiodiversity hot spots, and the
sharing of expertise in agrobiodiversity, intellectual property rights,
genetic resource access and beneft sharing, and social mobilization.
In 2011, MSSRF conducted street plays and training programs on
farmers’ rights in 27 tribal villages of Boipariguda, Jeypore and
Kundura in Koraput, reaching a total population of 5,000 tribal and
rural farmers. To date, Jeypore farmers have formally registered six
native varieties with the PVPFRA.
12
“In view of the emerging challenge global environmental change including climate, emphasis
needs to be shifted towards addressing new dimensions of on-farm conservation of biodiversity
for food security, poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods.”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
13
Sustainability and Replication
SUSTAINABILITY
Since 2006, MSSRF has been carrying out its work on biodiversity in
close cooperation with the tribal villages of Koraput. Processes and
results of all projects are documented and converted into multimedia
resources, and used as training material and as tools for education
and learning. Attempts are made to facilitate replication of this body
of learning through village knowledge centers and farmer groups
that act as vehicles for sustainability.
In recognition of the initiative’s achievements, the State Government
of Orissa provided land to the Foundation for the establishment of
a Community Agrobiodiversity Centre at Koraput. This permanent
facility will include laboratories and a training center that will
contribute signifcantly to the long-term sustainability of the
project’s work.
At the grassroots level, the eforts of MSSRF and the communities
of the Jeypore tract have been institutionalized through the
development of community-based organizations that are carrying
out projects with increasing autonomy from the Foundation. These
include the Panchabati Grama Unnayana Samiti (PGUS), Central
Village Committees, the Kalinga Kalajeera Seed Growers Society
(KKSGS), village seed banks, self-help groups, and the project’s
central management committee. These local institutions have the
ability to sustain, enhance and expand the project’s environmental
benefts throughout the district’s communities and ecosystems.
The Panchabati Grama Unnayan Samiti is a community-based
organization bringing together the sixteen target communities. The
organization is funded by interest earned on the USD 35,000 Equator
Prize, awarded to MSSRF in 2002. This interest totaled INR 300,000
(USD 5,855) in 2010-2011, and has been reinvested by communities
in local resource development, including the renovation of village
and farm ponds to conserve rainwater for agriculture, household
use and fsh farming. The organization won the Genome Saviour
Award in 2009-10 and six representatives of the sixteen villages were
honored with a check for INR 1,000,000 (USD 19,510) in a ceremony
in New Delhi in recognition of their contribution to the conservation
and promotion of local genetic resources in the feld of biodiversity.
Central Village Committees have been created in all of the project’s
target villages, with executive body members elected by villagers for
a one-year periods. These committees are responsible for monitoring
the work of projects in the villages, and providing suggestions for
improvement, and play a key role in village resource management.
All social, technical, and political conficts are placed before the
committee for resolution. Each committee manages a Village
Development Fund into which community members pay individual
contributions ranging between IDR 5-30 each month. The funds are
designed to meet emergency needs and provide fnancial assistance
to individuals or groups. All village funds are formalized and linked
to banks for availing loans. In 2010-2011, IDR 56,098 was collected
from 958 households.
The Kalinga Kalajeera Rice Growers Cooperative Society has taken on
considerable responsibility in recent years, building on MSSRF’s work
in promoting the cultivation of commercial Kalajeera, Machhakanta
and Haladichudi rice varieties. The Society has conducted farmer-to-
farmer extension programs to encourage cultivation of these crops,
bringing substantial economic rewards to its members. A total of
thirty self-help groups have also been established. These groups
take regular deposits from members and are able to take out loans
to invest in activities including goat rearing, agricultural activities,
fsh farming and mushroom cultivation.
Finally, village seed banks have been replicated in all target
communities, focusing on conserving traditional landraces of
rice, ragi, horse-gram and green-gram, with grains collected from
community members. These local institutions are linked to the
MSSRF Community Gene Bank in Chennai. The range of local
institutions established has helped to devolve the management
“Communities should pool and utilize their local bio-resources and form local institutions for
ensuring long term sustainability. Capacity building is another important component to sustain
a project for a long term. Building a corpus fund is essential for improved management and
continuity”
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Chairman, Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa
14 14
of the project to the grassroots level, avoiding overall dependence
on any one entity, while substantially building local capacity. These
institutions underpin the work of MSSRF and have been key drivers
of the initiative’s growth, expansion and sustainability.
REPLICATION
Since the initiative was begun, the area under landrace cultivation,
the number of diferent local varieties in use, and the number of farm
families participating in the project have all increased signifcantly
across the target villages. In 1998, a total of 100 farming families
from eight villages in Koraput district were involved in the initiative’s
activities. This number has since increased to nearly 1,000 families
from sixteen villages, encompassing members of fve diferent tribal
communities. The area under cultivation increased from 278.5 acres
to 366 acres between 2000 and 2005; the number of landraces being
cultivated increased from 72 to 83 in the same period, while the
number of participating farm families rose from 250 to 390.
This rate of scaling-up has continued, and by 2009, the area under
landraces had increased to 402 acres and involved 978 farm
families. Village Seed Banks are now operating in seventeen villages,
conserving a total of 24 rice landraces, up from six varieties in 2002.
Knowledge has been disseminated rapidly to other regions and
farming communities through farmer-to-farmer exchanges, while
a ‘Train the Trainers’ program has equipped model farmers in the
dissemination of more complex scientifc knowledge. The project is
promoted through village knowledge centers, which use information
and communications technology to promote the project as well as
for outreach and knowledge dissemination. Training modules have
been created for the extension of improved agronomic practices.
Knowledge generated by the initiative is extensively disseminated to
other stakeholders during formal meetings, presentations, websites
and scientifc and other publications. Farmer-to-farmer knowledge
difusion also occurs organically during visits to local markets, as
well as through interaction during religious and social functions.
NGOs in Kalahandi and Malkangiri districts have also played a role
in replication, while the State Government of Orissa is in the process
of funding local biodiversity projects based on the knowledge and
experiences of MSSRF projects in Koraput.
PARTNERS
The project’s leading partners include the M. S. Swaminathan
Research Foundation (MSSRF), the Swiss Agency for Development
and Cooperation (SDC), United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) Equator Initiative and the Plant Variety Protection and
Farmers Rights Authority.
Beyond these organizations, a wider range of stakeholders are
often brought together by MSSRF for knowledge exchanges and
policy development. For instance, a pilot study on conservation
and the adaptive management of globally important agricultural
heritage systems was carried out during 2010-2011 with support
from UN FAO. This involved a one-day national consultation in
Jeypore in November 2010. Regional consultations for this were
conducted with participants from national institutions such as
the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority,
the Central Rice Research Institute, the National Bureau of Plant
Genetic Resources; state institutions such as the Orissa University
of Agriculture and Technology; and members of NGOs, community-
based organizations, farmers, local government and Panchayat Raj
Institution members of Koraput district.
Click the thumbnails below to read more case studies like this:
FURTHER REFERENCE
• Hooper, M., Jafry, R., Marolla, M., and Phan, J. Scaling up Community Eforts to Reach the MDGs: An Assessment of the Experience from the
Equator Prize. UNDP. http://www.equatorinitiative.org/images/stories/2002winners/Tribal_Jeypore/scalingup.pdf
• Tribal Communities of the Jeypore Tract of Orissa Photo Story (Vimeo) http://vimeo.com/15672408
Equator Initiative
Environment and Energy Group
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
304 East 45th Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: +1 212 906-6691
Fax: +1 212 906-6642
www.equatorinitiative.org
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and con-
necting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life.
The Equator Initiative brings together the United Nations, governments, civil society, businesses and grassroots organizations
to recognize and advance local sustainable development solutions for people, nature and resilient communities.
©2012 by Equator Initiative
All rights reserved
doc_124148406.pdf