Sales Organization Structure and Deployment

Description
covers in detail the structures of typical sales organizations.

Sales Organization Structure and Sales Force Deployment

Setting the Stage
Strategy and Sales Organization Structure: IBM
1. What is one of the key changes IBM made to the structure of its sales organization? 2. What change did IBM make to the way its salespeople and sales managers interact?

Sales Organization Concepts
Specialization
The degree to which individuals perform some of the required tasks to the exclusion of others. Individuals can become experts on certain tasks, leading to better performance for the entire organization.

Centralization
The degree two which important decisions and tasks performed at higher levels in the management hierarchy. Centralized structures place authority and responsibility at higher management levels.

Sales Force Specialization Continuum

Generalists
All selling activities and all products to all customers

Some specialization of selling activities, products, and/or customers

Specialists
Certain selling activities for certain products for certain customers

Span of Control vs. Management Levels
Flat Sales Organization
National Sales Manager

Management Levels

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

Span of Control

Span of Control vs. Management Levels
Tall Sales Organization
National Sales Manager

Management Levels

Regional Sales Manager

Regional Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

District District Sales Sales Manager Manager

Span of Control

Line vs. Staff Positions

National Sales Manager Sales Training Manager Regional Sales Managers Sales Training Manager District Sales Managers Staff Position Salespeople Line Position

Selling-Situation Factors and Organizational Structure
Organizational Structure
Specialization

Environmental Characteristics
High Envir. uncertainty

Task Performance Performance Objective
Nonroutine Adaptiveness

Centralization

Low Envir. Uncertainty

Repetitive

Effectiveness

Customer and Product Determinants of Sales Force Specialization
Customer Needs Different
MarketDriven Specialization GeographyDriven Specialization Product/MarketDriven Specialization ProductDriven Specialization

Simple Product Offering

Complex Range of Products

Customer Needs Similar

Geographic Sales Organization
National Sales Manager
Sales Training Manager

Eastern Region Sales Manager

Western Region Sales Manager

Zone Sales Managers (4)

Zone Sales Managers (4)

District Sales Managers (20)

District Sales Managers (20)

Salespeople (100)

Salespeople (100)

Product Sales Organization
National Sales Manager

Office Equipment Sales Manager

Office Supplies Sales Manager

District Sales Managers (10)

District Sales Managers (10)

Salespeople (100)

Salespeople (100)

Market Sales Organization
National Sales Manager
Commercial Accounts Sales Manager Sales Training Manager Zone Sales Managers (4) District Sales Managers (25) Salespeople (150) District Sales Managers (5) Salespeople (50) Government Accounts Sales Manager

Functional Sales Organization
National Sales Manager

Field Sales Manager Regional Sales Managers (4) District Sales Managers (16) Salespeople (160)

Telemarketing Sales Manager District Sales Managers (2) Salespeople (40)

Identifying Major Accounts

Large Size of Account

Large Account

Major Account

Regular Small Account

Complex Account

Simple Complex Complexity of Account

Major Accounts Options

Develop Major Account Salesforce

Assign Major Accounts to Sales Managers

Assign Major Accounts to Salespeople along with Other Accounts

Comparison of Sales Organization Structures
Organizational Structure Advantages
• Low Cost • No geographic duplication • No customer duplication • Fewer management levels

Disadvantages
• Limited specialization • Lack of management control over product or customer emphasis

Geographic

Product

• Salespeople become experts • High cost in product attr. & applications • Geographic duplication • Management control over • Customer duplication selling effort

Comparison of Sales Organization Structures
Organizational Structure Advantages
• Salespeople develop better understanding of unique customer needs • Management control over selling allocated to different markets

Disadvantages

Market

• High cost • Geographic duplication

Functional

• Efficiency in performing selling activities

• Geographic duplication • Customer duplication • Need for coordination

Hybrid Sales Organization Structure
National Sales Manager

Commercial Accounts Sales Manager

Government Accounts Sales Manager

Major Accounts Sales Manager

Regular Accounts Sales Manager

Office Equipment Sales Manager

Office Supplies Sales Manager

Field Sales Manager

Telemarketing Sales Manager

Western Sales Manager

Eastern Sales Manager

Salesforce Deployment
Sales Force deployment decisions can be viewed as providing answers to three interrelated questions.
1. How much selling effort is needed to cover accounts and prospects adequately so that sales and profit objectives will be achieved? 2. How many salespeople are required to provide the desired amount of selling effort? 3. How should territories be designed to ensure proper coverage of accounts and to provide each salesperson with a reasonable opportunity for success?

Interrelatedness of Sales Force Deployment Decisions
Allocation of Allocation of Selling Effort Selling Effort Sales Force Sales Force Size Size Territory Territory Design Design
How much selling effort is needed to cover accounts and prospects adequately so that sales and profit objectives will be achieved?

How many salespeople are required to provide the desired amount of selling effort?

How should territories be designed and salespeople assigned to territories to ensure proper coverage of accounts and to provide each salesperson with a reasonable opportunity for success?

Analytical Approaches to Allocation of Selling Effort
Easy to Develop and Use Single Factor Single Factor Models Models Low Analytical Rigor High Analytical Rigor

Portfolio Portfolio Models Models

Decision Decision Models Models Difficult to Develop and Use

Single Factor Models

• • • •

Easy to develop and use/low analytical rigor Accounts classified into categories based on one factor, such as market potential All accounts in the same category are assigned the same number of sales calls Effort allocation decisions are based on the analysis of only one factor and differences among accounts in the same category are not considered in assigning sales call coverage

Single Factor Model Example

Market Potential Categories A B C D

Average Sales Calls to an Account Last Year 25 23 20 16

Average Sales Calls to an Account Next Year 32 24 16 8

Portfolio Models

• Account Opportunity - an account’s need for and ability to purchase the firm’s products • Competitive Position - the strength of the relationship between the firm and an account

Portfolio Model Segments and Strategies
Competitive Position Strong Weak Account Opportunity High
Segment 1 Segment 2

Low

Segment 3

Segment 4

Decision Models

• Simple Basic Concept - to allocate sales calls to accounts that promise the highest sales return from the sales calls • Optimal number of calls in terms of sales or profit maximization

Sales Force Size: Key Considerations

• Sales Productivity - the ratio of sales generated to selling effort used
– In early stages, the addition of salespeople increases sales considerably more than the selling costs. As salespeople continue to be added, sales increases tend to decline until a point is reached when the costs to add a salesperson are more than the revenues that salesperson can generate.

• Salesforce Turnover
– Is very costly – Should be anticipated

Sales Force Size: Analytical Tools

The Breakdown Approach is used to determine the number of salespeople needed to generate a forecasted level of sales. This approach is easy to develop. However, it is weak conceptually. The concept underlying the calculations is that sales determine the number of salespeople needed—putting “the cart before the horse.”

Salesforce size = Forecasted sales / Average sales per person

Sales Force Size: Analytical Tools

The Workload Approach determines how much selling effort is needed to adequately cover the firm’s market. Then the number of salespeople required to provide this amount of selling effort is calculated. This approach relatively simple to develop and is sound conceptually.
Total selling effort needed Average selling effort per salesperson

Number of salespeople =

Sales Force Size: Analytical Tools

The Incremental Approach is the most rigorous for calculating salesforce size. Its compares the marginal profits and marginal costs associated with each incremental salesperson. The major advantage is that it quantifies the important relationships between salesforce size, sales, and costs. However, this method is difficult to develop, and it cannot be used for new sales forces where historical data and accurate judgments are not possible.
# of Salespeople
100 101 102 103

Marginal Contribution
$85,000 $80,000 $75,000 $70,000

Marginal Cost
$75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000

Designing Territories

• Territories consist of whatever specific accounts are assigned to a specific salesperson. The territory can be viewed as the work unit for a salesperson. • Territory Considerations
– Trading areas – Present effort – Recommended effort

Territory Design Procedure

Select Planning and Control Unit

Analyze Planning and Control Unit Opportunity

Form Initial Territories

Assess Territory Workload

Finalize Territory Design



doc_427081684.ppt
 

Attachments

Back
Top