reality tv shows....

who are better judges on reality shows?

  • audience

    Votes: 31 47.0%

  • judges

    Votes: 35 53.0%
  • Total voters
    66
yes i think its important that the the judges should be the judges themselves.because they are professional they know about their field better than the normal audience.
 
i think judges know better than the audiences as many of the times audience vote according to the contestant's popularity or looks. many times thay overlook the talent in the contestant.
 
acording to me...reality shows must be based on judges only..as they are the expert in their feil..adience vote anyway mayb bcoz of their liking..or anything else..
the one one who gains from a ll these reality shows are the producers who in the name of votes earn crores of rupees..and the celebrities also..irrespective of winning or losing they make a bomb n get a lot of pulicity also
 
BUT REALIYU SHOWS CAN BE USED FOR THE PROMOTION OF VARIUS PRODUCTS..AS ALWAYZ DOES BY THE MARKETING PEOPLE
 
from my point of view, audiences are the judges for tv shows because they are the one who observes clearly and will know the effectiveness of the shows
 
they are a waste of talent.........all are biased.... and the selection depends on public following...not real talent
 
I think guys this system currently going on on all Reality TV shows should made more transparent to the public this is my opinion.
Guys if u check most of them don't even care about telling during the telecast tht hw many votes have been by the audience to a particular participant.

So wat i thik is tht judges should be thr along with the audience but the system should be more transparent.


Amit
 
hey buddy i m one of the fan of reality TV Shows and love to watch all reality TV Shows because reality tv shows create Arouse or elicit a feeling in my mind. actually these tv shows show us special unusual activity or creativity given by Characters of Reality TV Shows. There fore i think Audience are better judges. as an example you are discuss here about to be who is better and give your own views about it. you are also likes to be audience judges and giving your own views about who is better. So Audience are better judges in Reality TV Shows.
 
i would say audience and judges ... bcuz its all about games behind the scene. Ultimately they will choose a guy/gal with talent [judges] and publicity [audience] ....
 
hie,,,i ve not read the earlier responses,,,,bt as per my opinion as i ve voted for judges),,,,i think tat votin is not da rit means of findin out a winner coz we ve seen it many a times tat a contestant wins not on the basis of his talent bt on da only reason that his COMMUNITY is very supportive,,,,to shed as many votes to keep the person of their CASTE in the competition,,,,,along wid this we all mus hav cum across a contestant askin for votes from his/her particular community,,,so i strongly feel dis is nt the rit way,,,,,judges , if unbiased, are the best measure of performance,,,,,,but who can stop channel walas to stop this messagin thing ch is helpin dem to earn crores of rupees.:big_grin::big_grin:
 
I stick to d judges as one worthy –honorable reality show strike in may mind ie. boogie woogie.i respect it bcuz they r not giving right to audience to judge contestant for sake of earning money .even they r giving good judgment every time.

Judges
Audience
merits
they have sum knowledge n ability thatsy they r on those chairs
They can avoid partiality of the judge’s n internal management. They can give chance to fresh or hidden talent. N no individual responsible for their decision as mass voting system give d result
demerits
Sometimes partiality can b happen or perception of judges can also affect their decision
they can b influenced by the outer glitter of the contestants so chances to avoid or ignore the required talent of the crown
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top