Political Positioning in Era of Appeal & Angst

Political Positioning in Era of Appeal & Angst

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 13th December 2016

The search for post Demonetization theme for Political leaders to follow, now seems to be on. Especially so since some crucial elections are due. While leaders have just started off with the drive to offer balm to people standing in queues in the poll bound states. The ruling parties are ogling towards the MNREGA and other government schemes which can help subside the impact for those who may have been caught on the wrong foot especially so in the rural areas. It may be noted that even in urban areas, it the migrant labourers may have taken some blows and went back to hinterland to the rescue through MNREGA. The political tone setting in commercial news media depending upon its loyalties goes mostly on account of poor implementation alone rather than overall delivery to people through the exercise. While some on the other hand would swear by the sex-appeal of the demonetization drive with supposed impact on the rich and the corrupt. Then of course some in media would bring out the argument of lack of preparation for the exercise without even exploring the preparation made the government and its bureaucrats for distribution of Coal blocks, contracts or airwaves etc. Of course there have been some tragedies in this exercise and that is likely to remain a stickler in some of the areas provided parties decide to back some of the candidates through some positive action in electoral huslings, but looks like no one is thinking about it except for serving their own dish which is a mix of hyperbole and rhetoric. Instead of sheding crocodile tears, if the parties and/or leaders decide to let some of the people speak for themselves at the hustlings, which would make their task much simpler, but seems forgotten. That ‘Game’ is all about fair distribution of political opportunities and punishment is also delivered as per laid out rules is forgotten in a hurry to the own peril of ‘leaders’.

So, the attempt to explore a new type of polarization is on. This might be an improvement over the caste based appeal or religious polarization of yesteryears, although reliance on this tool is yet to be seen as not ‘leaders’ seem to be ready as of yet. The prophets are already out with their prophecies on win-ability & alliances and this may also include a rather bold forecast about seats. These forecast seem rather based on the new economic gambit failing on the short term, which is most likely. And this is construed as a lack of plank or under-preparation on the older electoral planks & rhetoric which would send some parties and leaders scurrying for cover. It is therefore assumed that there are unlikely to be any bold questions to be faced as a matter of political convenience. That the old equations have almost been already tested in the ‘game’ seems to be forgotten in the hurry to resurrect old equations albeit under some new façade. We still do not have parties or leaders exploring the basics about ration distribution, jobs, basic infrastructure etc. Of course we have sundry attempts to sell some of the old talking points as well as some new ones like action on terror, but without any reference to issues of the people of the state. The parties in fray seem to have a lot of leader-speak especially on the economic issues or more particularly on Notebandi but there seems to be a complete lack on any economic agenda that has any potential to sell in the state with maximum unemployed and maximum land-less. The Skills program or the Manufacturing focus seems to have had little impact so far. While the plan for Agri-processing might have been of some help but the competitive politics almost always ensures that such units see huge risks which overwhelms the risk-takers appetite. Ruling class wants to sell itself once again but does the king have any clothes. Let’s see the game evolve further…..
 
In the contemporary era of heightened appeal and deep-seated angst, political positioning has become a complex and multifaceted endeavor. As societies grapple with rapid globalization, technological advancements, and shifting economic landscapes, the political climate is increasingly influenced by the dual forces of popular appeal and underlying societal unease. Politicians and parties are compelled to navigate this landscape carefully, crafting narratives that resonate with the public's desires for immediate solutions while addressing the deeper, often more systemic, concerns that fuel widespread anxiety. This dynamic often leads to the polarization of political discourse, where nuanced discussions are overshadowed by emotionally charged rhetoric designed to mobilize support. The challenge lies in balancing the need to be responsive to public sentiment with the responsibility to provide stable, thoughtful governance. In this era, the ability to connect with voters on a personal level, through authentic and transparent communication, is paramount. However, it is equally important to avoid the pitfalls of populism, which can erode the fabric of democratic institutions. As political actors seek to position themselves, they must consider the long-term implications of their actions and words, striving to build a foundation of trust and reliability that can withstand the volatile currents of modern public opinion.
 
Back
Top