Organisational Structure

Description
The organizational Structure is seeks to established relation among all the person working in the organisation.

1

Presented To :
Mr. Ajmer Singh Head Of Department MBA
Presented By : Prachi Garg
2

Organizational structure
? The

Organizational design
? ? ? ? ? ?

formal arrangement of jobs within an organization.

A process involving decisions about six key elements:
Work specialization Departmentalization Chain of command Span of control centralization and decentralization Formalization

3

Work specialization ? The degree to which tasks in the organization are divided into separate jobs with each step completed by a different person. ? Overspecialization can result in human diseconomies from boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover.

4

?

The organizational Structure is seeks to established
relation among all the person working in the organisation.The purpose of defining the relation is

to clarify who is the superior and who
subordinate. It can be asserted

is the
the

that

establishment of the relation among various person

working in the enterprise is called organizational
structure
?

O.S. is design in accordance with the characteristics of enterprise so it can have many forms.
5

? According

to Hurley

Organization Structure are the pattern of relation among the various positions in a firm and among the various people occupying the positions.
?

According to William

Organization Structure deals with overall organizational arrangement in an enterprise.

6

1.Line organization

2.Line and staff organization
3. Functional organization and 4. Committee organization
7

? In

it authority and responsibility moves from

top to bottom in straight line.itz also called military organization because of fact that Organization structure in the army is done on this base because an order given by general

reaches soldier through their superiors like
colonel, major, captain etc

8

? Orders

Move from top to bottom ? Complaints moves from bottom to top. ? Each superior have limited number of subordinates.

? Authority

is concentrated in hands of top level. ? Every employee is answerable to nearest superiors.

9

? Speedy

action ? Unity of command ? Easy to establish.

10

? Overloading

of key men. ? Lack of specialty. ? Inadequate communication. ? Lack of initiatives. ? Possibility of favoritism. ? Excessive dependence. ? Monopoly over decision.

11

The function of line officers is to take decisions, while the function of staff officers is to advise them. staff officers are experts in their field and they offer their useful advice after analyzing the problem presented by line officer. In this way work of thinking an execution is done by different persons. The lines officer are not here bound to accept the advice offered by staff officer. Because the line officer alone are responsible for final performance.

Suitability:-

The line n staff organization have proved a blessings 4 large organizations.
12

The system is suitable mostly in the following situations:? When size of business is small. ? Where the number of employee is small. ? Where the business is only of one kind, or in other words where only a single product is manufactured n sold.

13

According to LOUIS.A.ALLEN ? staff refer to those elements of the organization which provide advice and service to the line. According to NEWMAN ? Staff work is that part of managerial work that an executive assigns to someone outside the chain of command.

14

? The

work of thinking and execution is dividing of the line into two parts. ? The line of the line organization remain intact. ? Benefit of the advice of the experts becomes available . ? Subordinate of line executives remain their subordinates alone. ? The principle of the unity of command remain implemented. ? Movement of authority is from top to bottom.
15

? Sound

decisions. ? Increase in efficiency. ? Specialization possible. ? Advantage of line organization. ? Research facilitates. ? More facility of expansions. ? Discipline.

16

? More

administrative costs. ? Lack of responsibility of experts. ? Conflict between line n staff authority. ? Only theoretical advice. ? Lengthy decision making process. ? Ambiguity regarding authority. ? Dependence on experts.

17

F.w.taylor is the father of this form. its completely based on principle of specialization and under it ability of experts is fully utilized.

18

Advantages
?•

Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and people ? with common skills, knowledge, and orientations ? • Coordination within functional area ? • In-depth specialization

Disadvantages
?•

Poor communication across functional areas ? • Limited view of organizational goals
19

? According

to NEWMAN:a committee consists of a group of people specially designed to perform some administrative acts . ? According to TERRY:a body of persons elected or appointed to meet on an organizational basis 4 the discussion and dealing of matters brought before it.

SUITABILITY:-TO adopt it for purpose of planning
,controlling ,solving departmental problems in a big business.
20

According to Taylor:the functional organization consists of so dividing the management that each man down from the assistant superintendent shall have as few functions as possible 2 perform.

Characteristics:Principle of unity of command is followed. ? Work is divided in 8 groups which yield the benefits of specialization. ? i.e. instruction card clerk, route clerk, time n cost clerk, discipline officer, gang boss, speed boss, repair boss, inspector.
?
21

MERITS:
? ?

SOUND DECISIONS.

DEVELOPMENT OF NEW IDEAS ? EASY COMMUNICATION. ? DECENTRALISATION OF AUTHORITY.

DEMERITS:
DELAY IN DECISIONS. ? DIFFICULTY IN DECIDING RESPONSIBILITY. ? EXPENSIVE AND LACK OF SECRECY,INITIATIVITY.
?
22

Thanks…………
23



doc_471491545.pptx
 

Attachments

Back
Top