Mistakes are made on two counts: an argument is either based on error or incorrectly developed

Mistakes are made on two counts: an argument is either based on error or incorrectly developed

1141_artworkimage.jpg


THE LIST OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL DELUSION GOES AS FOLLOWS

Waiting For The Performance Appraisal To Give Feedback

Misunderstanding the clients' needs

Relying on the clients' interpretation of USPAP

Failure to create the proper "scope of work"

Not notifying the client of limited expertise or lack of it for an assignment

Incomplete research of the subject property

Reliance on only one data collection source for comparables

Inability to properly explain adjustments and/or final reconciliation

Failure to identify zoning/ highest and best use issues

Incomplete work files/ unsigned certifications

Lack of Geographical Competency

Overemphasizing Recent Performances

Being Too Positive Or Negative

Being Critical Without Being Constructive

Talking Not Listening

State the date of the valuation and the date prepared

Define the purpose of the valuation

Define the standard of value (e.g. Fair Market)

Conduct a site visit

Include assumptions and limiting conditions

Discuss:

Company background

Industry in which the company participates

Market in which the company competes

Competition

Economic environment in which the company competes

Prepare a comparative financial analysis with industry performance

Examine and discuss all common valuation methods

Adequately define "earnings"

Disclose assumptions and source of cash flow projections

Define formulas - CAPM, WACC, Fama-French, Gordon Growth Model

Apply the proper discount/capitalization rate to "earnings" as defined

Adequately discuss and analyze guideline companies selected

Discuss empirical data sources for premiums and discounts applied

Reconcile values indicated by each valuation method examined

Select one value

Disclose sources of information contained in the report

 
Back
Top