Success is directly proportional to the amount of criticism you attract - so said someone many moons ago. While this quote has formed the theme of many other quotes/movies/soaps, we came to see its relevance only today. Hindustan Times published an article today, highlighting the practice of "outsourcing" of projects, rampant amongst b-school students these days. While it's very responsible on HT's part to report this and bring it to everyone's attention, what's callous on their part is the fact that they have missed out (or simply ignored) the other side of the story, without which it's a skewed piece of reporting.
All the top institutes in the country have software which traces plagiarism, which highlights any instances of copy-pasting of previously published research material. In order to curb such practices, the respective professor/research assistant has to proactively look out for and identify any instances of "outsourcing" of projects. The onus here lies completely on the professor here, and they should ensure that those found guilty of indulging in such practices are severely penalized. The article absolutely fails to address this issue.
While that might still be an oversight, what's absolutely unforgiving is the fact that the article doesn't touch upon the moot point here: Information sharing is not the problem; it's the students' attitude which is. If knowledge sharing is to be outlawed, we would be going against the very principle on which the entire internet is based. Granted, easy access to readymade projects makes it easier for students to "cheat", and pass off someone else's work as their own. However, ManagementParadise.com simply provides a platform for the students to get initiated in the knowledge-sharing process; it's the students who are responsible for building on and adding to this repository of knowledge, rather than unethically copy-pasting stuff in their own reports. By doing that, it's the student himself who ultimately loses out on the "learning" that he ought to be gaining from a management degree.
It seems the author missed out the point that even IIM puts up research reports of their students on their website which serves as reading material to sharpen knowledge of aspirants and students alike.
Ultimately, like Mr. Kondap mentions in the article himself, companies question the students in-depth regarding the project work they completed during their MBA. If companies can do that to identify plagiarists, shouldn't it be easier for professors to do the same in their own area of specialization?
ManagementParadise.com prides itself on being a knowledge pool for management students; however, it's upon the students to decide how responsibly they wish to exploit this resource.
- Authored,
Anupam Joshi,
Public Relations Head,
Management Paradise.
- Signed,
Kartik Raichura,
Founder and CEO,
Management Paradise.
Whats Your take on this issue. Feel free to comment / criticize. We are open to criticism.
All the top institutes in the country have software which traces plagiarism, which highlights any instances of copy-pasting of previously published research material. In order to curb such practices, the respective professor/research assistant has to proactively look out for and identify any instances of "outsourcing" of projects. The onus here lies completely on the professor here, and they should ensure that those found guilty of indulging in such practices are severely penalized. The article absolutely fails to address this issue.
While that might still be an oversight, what's absolutely unforgiving is the fact that the article doesn't touch upon the moot point here: Information sharing is not the problem; it's the students' attitude which is. If knowledge sharing is to be outlawed, we would be going against the very principle on which the entire internet is based. Granted, easy access to readymade projects makes it easier for students to "cheat", and pass off someone else's work as their own. However, ManagementParadise.com simply provides a platform for the students to get initiated in the knowledge-sharing process; it's the students who are responsible for building on and adding to this repository of knowledge, rather than unethically copy-pasting stuff in their own reports. By doing that, it's the student himself who ultimately loses out on the "learning" that he ought to be gaining from a management degree.
It seems the author missed out the point that even IIM puts up research reports of their students on their website which serves as reading material to sharpen knowledge of aspirants and students alike.
Ultimately, like Mr. Kondap mentions in the article himself, companies question the students in-depth regarding the project work they completed during their MBA. If companies can do that to identify plagiarists, shouldn't it be easier for professors to do the same in their own area of specialization?
ManagementParadise.com prides itself on being a knowledge pool for management students; however, it's upon the students to decide how responsibly they wish to exploit this resource.
- Authored,
Anupam Joshi,
Public Relations Head,
Management Paradise.
- Signed,
Kartik Raichura,
Founder and CEO,
Management Paradise.
Whats Your take on this issue. Feel free to comment / criticize. We are open to criticism.
Last edited: