Description
Kingfisher plc is Europe’s leading home improvement retail Group and the third largest in the
world, with over 1,000 stores in eight countries in Europe and Asia. Its main retail brands are
B&Q, Castorama, Brico Dépôt and Screwfix. Kingfisher also operates the Koçtas¸ brand, a 50%
joint venture in Turkey with the Koç Group, and has a 21% interest in Hornbach, Germany’s
leading large format DIY retailer.
CREATING
THE
LEADER
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Progress report on our strategy
Our online reporting
Increasing numbers of our shareholders are choosing to receive their annual report online,
which helps us reduce the impact on the environment through lower paper usage. The
online version, available at www.kingfisher.com, enables you to download the report
to your computer desktop and access supplementary content, such as video interviews
with the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, and case studies from around
the Group businesses which highlight some of the year’s achievements.
If you have a smartphone or tablet device, use the links and QR codes in this printed copy
to take you straight to that part of the online report.
Key highlights
For the online report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
3
6
8
5
4
7
6
7
0
8
0
7
7
1
5
£715m
-11.4%
Adjusted pre-tax pro?t*(m)
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
1
.
0
1
6
.
4
2
0
.
5
2
5
.
1
2
2
.
3
22.3p
-11.2%
Adjusted basic earnings per share*(p)
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
5
.
3
2
5
.
5
7
.
0
7
8
.
8
4
9
.
4
6
9.46p
+7.0%
Full year dividend (p)
* For de?nitions see the Financial Review on pages 17 to 24.
1
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Kingfisher plc is Europe’s leading home improvement retail Group and the third largest in the
world, with over 1,000 stores in eight countries in Europe and Asia. Its main retail brands are
B&Q, Castorama, Brico Dépôt and Screwfix. Kingfisher also operates the Koçtas¸ brand, a 50%
joint venture in Turkey with the Koç Group, and has a 21% interest in Hornbach, Germany’s
leading large format DIY retailer.
Contents
Business review
02 Kingfisher at a glance
04 Chairman’s statement
05 Chief Executive’s statement
06 Strategy: Creating the Leader
16 Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
17 Financial review
25 Risks
Governance
28 Board of Directors
30 Senior management
31 Directors’ report
34 Corporate governance
45 Directors’ remuneration report
Accounts
60 Consolidated income statement
61 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
62 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
63 Consolidated balance sheet
64 Consolidated cash flow statement
65 Notes to the consolidated financial statements
99 Independent auditors’ report to the members
of Kingfisher plc
100 Company balance sheet
101 Notes to the Company financial statements
113 Independent auditors’ report to the members
of Kingfisher plc
114 Group five year financial summary
115 Shareholder information
Contribution to Group sales (bn)
France £4.2bn 39%
UK & Ireland £4.3bn 41%
Other international* £2.1bn 20%
£10.6bn
Contribution to Group retail pro?t (m)
France £397m 51%
UK & Ireland £234m 30%
Other international £150m 19%
£781m
Property (at market value) (bn)
France £1.5bn 42%
UK & Ireland £0.9bn 25%
Other international* £1.2bn 33%
£3.6bn
* Excludes Turkey.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
2
BUSINESS REVIEW
Kingfisher at a glance
Our purpose
To make it easier for customers to have better and more sustainable homes
This approach will unlock more customer demand and grow our business to the benefit of all our stakeholders, creating a more
valuable business for our shareholders, a better partner for our suppliers, a more secure and brighter future for our colleagues
and a more sustainable business for our local communities.
Our key figures
Total sales Adjusted
pre-tax profit
Employees Stores
£10.6bn £715m 78,000 1,025
Our brands
B&Q is the largest
home improvement and
garden centre retailer in
the UK with 358 stores
across the UK and
Ireland offering around
40,000 products for the
homemaker, occasional
to serious DIYers, and
trade professionals.
In China, the business
is adapted to the
local preference for a
“Do-it-for-Me” model.
It specialises in the
fitting out and decoration
of new apartments.
With up to 50,000
products under one
roof, Castorama France
is one of the leading
home improvement
retailers in France with
103 stores. Like B&Q,
Castorama targets retail
customers and DIYers
and has an emphasis on
style and inspiration for
homemakers. In Poland
and Russia there is a
bigger emphasis on
projects, as the home
improvement market
is at an earlier stage of
its development.
In both France and
Spain Brico Dépôt is
primarily aimed at serious
DIYers and professional
builders. It operates a
low-price format which
offers customers a
choice of 10,000
products available in
larger product quantities.
Screwfix is the UK’s
largest omnichannel
supplier of trade tools,
accessories and hardware
to trade professionals and
serious DIY enthusiasts.
In addition to its catalogue
and website, Screwfix
operates 275 stores
across the UK.
Koçta s¸, Kingfisher’s
joint venture in Turkey,
is now the number one
home improvement
retailer in the country.
Its 37 stores are
aimed at mainstream
consumers, homemakers
and occasional to
serious DIYers.
For our European Home Report, a survey of 15,000
households and their attitudes to home improvement, visit
www.kingfisher.com/EuropeanHomeReport
Operating Countries
Joint Venture (Koc¸ tas¸)
Strategic Alliance (Hornbach)
Our operating countries
3
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Our markets
France
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
France 63 27 1 +0.5% 103 1,085 11,139
104 576 6,819
UK & Ireland
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
UK 62 27 1 +0.9 358
†
2,561
†
21,473
‡
275 20 3,804
Ireland 5 1.7 – +1.4
Other International
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
Poland 38 14 1 +1.5 65 487 10,576
5 26 361
China 1,354 393 – +8.0 39 326 4,449
Spain 45 18 2 -1.2 20 116 992
Russia 140 53 3 +2.8 19 170 2,483
Turkey 76 19 1 +4.5 37 194 3,240
Total 1,025 5,561 65,336
Store numbers, selling space and employee data as at
2 February 2013.
* The Economist Pocket World in Figures 2013. † Including Ireland (9 stores).
§ Credit Suisse. ‡ Including Ireland and Kingfisher Future Homes.
Kingfisher Group Executive
Kingfisher’s Group Executive team meets monthly and is responsible for the overall strategic decision-making of the Group. It is
supported by the Group Operating Board and the One Team Board, more information about which can be found on page 30.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief
Executive
Guy Colleau
CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and
Koçta s¸ brands
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama
and Brico
Dépôt brands
Steve Willett
CEO, Group
Productivity
and Development
Karen Witts
Group Finance
Director
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
4
BUSINESS REVIEW
Chairman’s statement
It has been a challenging year for
Kingfisher, but I am pleased to report that
we finished the year in good shape, with
a strong balance sheet, higher market
share in Europe and with our medium
term programme of self-help initiatives
(Creating the Leader) progressing well.
Our reported results were affected by
adverse currency movements, and the
particularly poor summer weather in
Northern Europe literally dampened
customer demand during our peak
season. Add to this the economic
uncertainty our customers are facing
across Europe and it is no surprise that
2012 was difficult for retailers in general.
But our teams have worked hard, actively
managing the business, focusing on
improving our customer offer and
optimising our cash generation in these
difficult markets. These are the right
things to do to ensure we can deliver
value for shareholders over the medium
term. We achieved growth in France, our
most significant market, and continued to
expand in Poland, Russia, Turkey and
Spain. Whilst B&Q found the UK
consumer market difficult, our trade
businesses in the UK, Screwfix and
TradePoint, grew strongly. We remain
confident in our future prospects and it is
for this reason that we are proposing to
raise the dividend by 7.0% despite
adjusted pre-tax profits being down
11.4% to £715m.
We have also continued to make good
progress on our sustainability agenda,
with the launch in October of our Net
Positive plan. You can read more
about Net Positive on page 16.
I would like to welcome two new directors
who joined the Board in October. Karen
Witts joined as Group Finance Director
and brings with her a wealth of financial
and operational management experience
from her previous roles at Vodafone and
BT, among others. Philippe Tible, a
highly experienced retailer, who is
responsible for our Castorama and Brico
Dépôt brands across Europe, also joined
the board. Euan Sutherland stepped
down from the Board in January to take
up a CEO role outside the Group and we
wish him well in his new position.
I would like to thank our 78,000 staff for
their hard work and commitment during
these difficult economic times. They have
done an excellent job providing the level
of service which customers expect and
ensuring that we start the new year
with confidence.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
Key highlights
£715m
Adjusted pre-tax profit
£691m
Pre-tax profit
22.3p
Adjusted basic EPS
24.1p
Basic EPS
9.46p
Full year dividend
“
OUR TEAMS HAVE WORKED HARD, ACTIVELY
MANAGING THE BUSINESS, FOCUSING ON
IMPROVING OUR CUSTOMER OFFER AND
OPTIMISING OUR CASH GENERATION IN
THESE DIFFICULT MARKETS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
5
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Chief Executive’s statement
As the Chairman says in his review, it
has been a tough year for Kingfisher, with
currency movements, weather and weak
consumer markets providing significant
headwinds for our businesses. But I am
pleased that the hard work of our teams
and our firm focus on our well established
programme of self-help initiatives, including
cost efficiencies and sourcing gains, helped
offset some of these headwinds and
enabled us to end the year in good shape.
We continued to actively manage the
business, generating cash and a positive
economic profit whilst successfully
delivering the first year of our Creating the
Leader programme, which is designed to
increase shareholder value over the
medium-term.
We made good progress on the four key
areas of this programme: Easier, Common,
Expand and One Team. This Annual
Report includes many examples of the key
milestones we achieved in the year but a
few worthy of particular note include:
Increased investment in online
retailing. Screwfix launched a mobile
‘click, pay & collect’ service for
customers and has developed a Group
omnichannel platform that has enabled
B&Q’s TradePoint business to launch a
transactional website. A lot of work also
went into preparing for the launch of a
new and improved online offer for
B&Q later in 2013.
Grown the amount of product that is
sourced direct from suppliers around
the world using our global network of
sourcing offices. Particularly strong
growth in direct sourced product was
achieved in our developing markets,
Poland, Russia, Turkey and China.
We also achieved our target of sharing
more of our best own brand products
across our businesses.
Opened 70 net new stores during
the year in markets where economic
returns are attractive, including 60 new
Screwfix units in the UK. We revamped
and extended five Castorama stores in
France and are trialling a new format
store in China targeting the Do-it-for-
Me apartment design market.
Worked more closely together as a
networked organisation. We have
now launched the Kingfisher ‘One
Academy’ with the aim of attracting
and developing a top team of the best
talent in international retailing. We also
launched Kingfisher’s Net Positive
sustainability strategy. Our aim is to go
beyond simply being ‘neutral’ or doing
less harm, towards making a net
positive contribution. Our focus is on
four areas: timber, energy, innovation
and communities and I am convinced
that this approach is vital as businesses
must be a force for good in society.
During the year we developed the wider
management team, mostly through
internal promotion, adding Steve Willett
and Guy Colleau to the Group Executive
team. Steve takes on responsibility
for our omnichannel activities as well as
overseeing Group productivity. Steve’s
previous role as CEO of Screwfix makes
him ideally suited to this role. Guy, who
was previously CEO of Castorama France,
takes on responsibility for driving our
product agenda across our businesses.
So, in summary, it was a tough year but
we ended it in good shape, with a strong
balance sheet and with our Creating the
Leader programme well underway. We
will continue with this programme in
the coming year and later in this Annual
Report you will find more details of the
key activities we have planned.
Although the economic background
remains challenging, I believe Kingfisher
continues to have excellent prospects as
we work towards our aim of making it
easier for customers to have better,
more sustainable homes.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
“
I BELIEVE KINGFISHER CONTINUES TO
HAVE EXCELLENT PROSPECTS AS WE WORK
TOWARDS OUR AIM OF MAKING IT EASIER
FOR CUSTOMERS TO HAVE BETTER,
MORE SUSTAINABLE HOMES.
”
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
To watch a video interview with
Ian Cheshire, go to
www.kingfisher.com/IanCheshirePrelims13
CREATING
THE
LEADER
OUR PURPOSE IS TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR
CUSTOMERS TO HAVE BETTER AND MORE
SUSTAINABLE HOMES
6
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
7
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Our markets
We currently operate in eight countries,
spanning over 500 million households.
Our research shows that spending on
home improvement is a key priority for
householders, making this an attractive
sector for retailers. It’s also attractive
because of the relatively small
number of well-known manufacturer
brands. This means a specialist home
improvement retailer provides a vital
role for the consumer by offering a
wide product choice and expert
advice. They can offer a high
proportion of ‘own brand’ product,
achieve economies of scale and have a
more defensible position against online
or generalist operators when compared
with other retail segments.
Strategy
Our unique contribution as a business
to our customers is that we can
harness our home improvement
experience, our heritage as a leader
in sustainability and our international
scale and sourcing capability to bring
new, more sustainable and more
affordable products to market.
By also providing our customers
with project advice and new shopping
channels to complement our stores,
we will make it easier for them to
adapt their homes to their evolving
needs. Our shorthand for describing
this purpose is ‘Better Homes,
Better Lives’.
The current phase of our development
towards this vision – Creating the
Leader – builds on the success of
‘Delivering Value’, our previous
four-year growth plan, which
has repositioned Kingfisher as a
stronger business in the attractive
home improvement market.
Creating the Leader: self-help initiatives
Four themes Eight steps Success measures
EASIER 1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
For more information see page 09.
• Like-for-like sales growth (LFL)
• Unique web users
COMMON 3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
For more information see page 11.
• 35% of Group sales direct sourced
• 50% of all product sales to be common
• Retail profit margin
EXPAND 5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
For more information see page 13.
• Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)*
* For definition of KEP see page 21.
ONE TEAM
7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
For more information see page 15.
• Group employee engagement scores
• Net Positive dashboard
Financial benefits
Predicting future potential retail profit benefits from this strategy, when we don’t know the economic conditions or
competitive landscape we will face in the future is very difficult. However, whatever the conditions, we believe our efforts will
drive higher LFL sales, higher gross margin and more cost efficiencies than would have been delivered without this strategy.
In 2011/12 we estimated that this would create an additional £300 million of annualised retail profit in the fifth year, net of
price reinvestment and based on the size of the business and market conditions at that time.
For more information on how our strategy is linked to Risk reporting and Remuneration see pages 25 and 45 respectively.
7
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
AFFORDABLE
CONVENIENT
A
D
V
I
C
E
ACCESSIBLE
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
CREATING
THE
LEADER
EASIER
8
9
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Key steps
1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Completed UK roll out of DIY
training classes
Launched B&Q YouTube channel
Trialling new formats in France,
UK, Turkey, Russia & China
Preparing for the UK’s ‘Green Deal’
Launched Screwfix mobile
‘click, pay & collect’ offer
Developed a Group
omnichannel platform,
implemented first in ‘TradePoint’
Upgrading B&Q’s online offer
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Emphasise our affordability credentials
Launch ‘Handy Prices’ marketing
campaign in B&Q
Roll out Brico Dépôt ‘back to basics’
marketing campaign
Extend Brico Dépôt France & Spain
programme of ‘arrivages’ (one off
special buys) to Turkey & Poland
Launch UK Enterprise Finance
Guarantee scheme for tradesmen
Extend our omnichannel offer:
Launch upgraded B&Q online offer
(www.diy.com)
Extend TradePoint website to main
shop floor categories
Launch upgraded websites in
Poland, Turkey, China, Brico Dépôt
France & Spain
Trial ‘click & collect’ in Castorama
France & Turkey
TradePoint launches new transactional
website (driven by Screwfix know-how)
Over 1 million hits for B&Q’s ‘You Can Do It’
YouTube channel
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
5
1
9
Unique web users (m)
Monthly Moving Annual Average
-2.9%
+1.3%
+23%
12/13
11/12
Like-for-like sales
WORLD’S BEST
PRODUCTS
LOCAL MARKETS
L
O
C
A
L
T
A
S
T
E
CHOICE
CREATING
THE
LEADER
COMMON
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
10
11
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Key steps
3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
19% of sales direct sourced
8% of sales common
Direct sourcing in our developing
markets up 63% (Poland, Russia,
Turkey & China)
Opened new direct sourcing office
in Turkey
Extended ‘Trade’ common own
brands in Screwfix & Brico Dépôt
Launched new tiling range in B&Q
UK & Ireland
Developed a stock forecasting
& replenishment IT solution,
successfully rolled out in B&Q UK
& Ireland and Poland
Driven Group-wide cost efficiencies
through GNFR (Goods not for resale)
savings from European-wide supply
negotiations & SAP contract
renegotiated on a Group-wide basis
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Product:
Launch energy-efficiency ‘iQE’
Group brand
Roll out ‘Colours’ Group own-brand
paint into Russia & Spain
Roll out new coloured emulsion
paint range in B&Q UK &
Castorama France
Launch exclusive Valspar mixing
desk paint into B&Q UK & Ireland
& China
Full launch of ‘Site’ workwear into
Brico Dépôt
First UK & France product show
Efficiency:
Upweighted distribution centre
capability in Poland, Spain & Turkey
Roll out France & Spain staff bonus
programmes to Poland (linked to
individual store sales & profit growth)
Brico Dépôt’s ‘Energer’ hand & power tool
range launched in Screwfix
New tiling range launched in B&Q UK
& Ireland (higher commonality with
Castorama France)
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
Common product sales
% of total sales
Products direct sourced
% of total sales
Retail pro?t margin (%)
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
2
8
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
5
1
9
8
.
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
7
.
4
GROWTH
HIGHER
RETURNS
T
R
A
D
E
FLEXIBILITY
AMBITION
CREATING
THE
LEADER
EXPAND
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
12
Key steps
5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Opened 70 net new stores
(UK 61
(1)
, France 2, Poland 3,
Russia 1, Turkey 1, Spain 3 &
China 1 closure)
Revamped & extended 5
Castorama France stores
Successfully integrated 28 Focus
DIY stores in the UK
Launching a 4,000m2 standalone
B&Q Design Centre trial store
in China
B&Q UK store rightsizing; 1 B&Q UK
store reduced in size by 50% in deal
completed with a supermarket group
(1) 60 Screwfix outlets & 1 B&Q.
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Open 68 net new stores (UK 50
Screwfix outlets, France 5, Poland 2,
Russia 1, Turkey 4 & Spain 6,
representing 3% space growth
Revamp & extend four
Castorama France stores
Evaluate Screwfix
international opportunities
Screwfix accelerates store opening
programme with 60 new stores
New format stores opened in France.
C’est Castoche!
Kingfisher’s 1,000th home improvement
store opened, in Lublin, Poland
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
King?sher Economic Pro?t (KEP)*(£m)
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
3
1
4
4
* For de?nition of KEP see page 21.
13
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
DEVELOPING
LEADERS
CONNECTING
PEOPLE
ENGAGEMENT
FORCE
FOR GOOD NET
POSITIVE
T
A
L
E
N
T
CREATING
THE
LEADER
ONE TEAM
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
14
Key steps
7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Broadened the Group
Executive Team with two internal
appointments (Guy Colleau as CEO,
Group Sourcing & Offer; Steve Willett
as CEO, Group Productivity
& Development)
Launched the Kingfisher ‘One
Academy’ (a virtual academy
for the top 250 managers)
Launched our new sustainability
plan, Net Positive, and
associated dashboard
Our aim is to give back more
than we take in the course of
our operations
Our four priority areas are
Timber, Energy, Innovation and
Communities (see page 16)
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Continue to extend the Kingfisher
‘One Academy’
Net Positive dashboard to be
updated annually
The Kingfisher ‘One Academy’ launched
for top 250 managers
Kingfisher launches new ambition to
become Net Positive (kids’ DIY classes
launched in Poland)
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
15
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Measures
Engagement scores
Gallup Q12 survey (out of 5)*
Sales of products with eco-credentials
(% of total sales)**
Sales of products with
eco-credentials: £2.1bn
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
4
.
3
4
.
1
* A GrandMean score above 4 out of 5 is ‘best in class’.
** For our Group performance summary go to www.king?sher.com/netpositive.
Total sales: £10.6bn
20%
of total sales
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
16
BUSINESS REVIEW
Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
KINGFISHER LAUNCHED NET POSITIVE IN 2012, WITH AN AMBITION TO CONTRIBUTE
POSITIVELY TO SOME OF THE BIG CHALLENGES FACING THE WORLD, WHILE CREATING
A MORE VALUABLE AND SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS FOR OUR STAKEHOLDERS.
Introduction
Net Positive is a new approach to doing
business for Kingfisher. It means going
beyond achieving zero impact,
and committing to make a positive
contribution across four priority
areas: Timber, Energy, Innovation and
Communities. In practice it means:
not just preventing deforestation but
working towards net reforestation; helping
to create homes that are generators of
their own energy; innovating products
and services that are restorative by
design; and working in communities to
connect people and equip them with
practical skills.
Net Positive underpins Kingfisher’s
Creating the Leader strategy. It will help
us secure resources, unlock opportunities
for growth, inspire our people, and be
a catalyst for collaboration.
In each of our priority areas we will
transform the way Kingfisher operates
to become Net Positive by 2050 (see
chart below). We will take what we learn
and integrate it across our business.
Progress will be reported via our Net
Positive dashboard.
Timber
Deforestation and rising demand
means wood prices could increase by
30-75% by 2020. To maintain access to
affordable supplies we need to protect
and improve forests.
Our aspiration is that by 2050 we will
create more forest than we use. We are
aiming for all timber and paper in our
operations, products, packaging and
construction to be responsibly sourced by
2020. Our companies such as B&Q UK
and Brico Dépôt Spain are starting
local forest projects that benefit the
environment and economy, and create
local sustainable timber supplies.
For the products we sold in 2012/13,
89% of the timber (by volume) was
responsibly sourced, compared with
86% in 2011/12.
Energy
With super energy-efficient products and
tools and materials for eco-retrofits and
micro-generation, we can help customers
save money and improve their homes.
The market for in-home energy efficiency
is predicted to be €70bn by 2020 across
our European markets.
Our aspiration is that by 2050 every
Kingfisher store and customer home is
zero carbon or generates more energy
than it consumes. Over the past two
years, sales of energy-saving products
helped our customers save over 5 TWh
in energy use. Our target is 38 TWh by
2020 – equivalent to the annual energy
consumption of every house in Scotland
(2.3 million homes).
We reduced our absolute carbon
footprint (emissions from property energy
use, dedicated delivery fleets and business
travel by road) by 3% compared with
2010/11, towards our target of a 25%
reduction by 2020, which helps to reduce
operating costs.
Innovation
Switching to more sustainable materials
and business models, and designing out
waste through closed loop systems,
generates value for our business and
customers. Our aspiration is that by 2050
every Kingfisher product will enable a
more sustainable and ultimately Net
Positive lifestyle, so that creating and
using products will waste nothing.
We have set a target to offer 1,000
different products with closed-loop
credentials by 2020, and we are working
towards this with partners such as the
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Many
products already have closed loop
credentials, such as B&Q’s New Life
Paint made from waste paint.
This builds on our track record in eco-
product innovation. During 2012/13
products with eco-credentials accounted
for 20% of retail sales (see page 15) and
we aim for 50% by 2020. ‘Best-in-class’,
our most innovative eco-products,
accounted for 5% of sales.
Communities
In local communities we have seen a
decline in the practical skills of making
and mending. Equipping people with
these skills is good for individuals and
communities and will help galvanise
potential customers.
Our aspiration is that every Kingfisher
store and location supports projects
which build local communities or equip
people with skills. By 2020, our target is
to have completed 4,000 community
projects that deliver our ‘Better Homes,
Better Lives’ purpose. In 2012/13 we
launched free DIY classes for school
children in Castorama Poland, a fun way
to learn about DIY and the environment.
For further information visit
www.kingfisher.com/netpositive
Our current progress on our Net Positive journey
Conventional
approach to date
1990 2050 Net Positive journey
Pioneering Net
Positive projects
Net Positive
tipping point
Net Positive
17
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review
Financial Summary
A summary of the reported financial results for the year ended
2 February 2013 is set out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
(Decrease)/
increase
Sales 10,573 10,831 (2.4)%
Adjusted pre-tax profit 715 807 (11.4)%
Profit before taxation after
exceptional items 691 797 (13.3)%
Adjusted basic earnings per share 22.3p 25.1p (11.2)%
Dividends 9.46p 8.84p 7.0%
A reconciliation of statutory profit to adjusted profit is set
out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
(Decrease)/
increase
Profit before taxation 691 797 (13.3)%
Exceptional items 26 12 116.7%
Profit before exceptional items
and taxation 717 809 (11.4)%
Financing fair value
remeasurements (2) (2) –
Adjusted pre-tax profit 715 807 (11.4)%
Profit and EPS including all exceptional items for the year ended
2 February 2013 are set out below:
2012/13 2011/12 Decrease
Profit after tax 564 639 (11.7)%
Basic EPS 24.1p 27.5p (12.4)%
Overview
The Group’s financial reporting year ends on the nearest
Saturday to 31 January. The current year is for the 53 weeks
ended 2 February 2013 with the comparative financial year
being for the 52 weeks ended 28 January 2012. This only
impacts the UK & Ireland businesses with all of the other
businesses reporting on a calendar basis as a result of local
requirements. The effect of the 53
rd
week on the results of the
Group is the inclusion of an additional £72m sales and an
immaterial benefit to retail profit.
Total sales grew by 0.5% on a constant currency 52 week basis
and declined by 2.4% to £10.6 billion (2011/12: £10.8 billion)
on a reported rate basis. On a like-for-like basis, Group sales
were down 2.9% (2011/12: +1.3%). During the year, a net
additional 69 new stores were opened, including 60 Screwfix
outlets, taking the store network to 988 stores (excluding 37
Turkey JV stores).
Retail profit before exceptional items declined by £101 million
to £781 million (2011/12: £882 million) including a £39 million
adverse foreign exchange movement representing a 7.3%
decline on a constant currency basis. This decline was as
a result of challenging trading conditions and unfavourable
weather patterns. Including exceptional items, retail profit
declined by 13.2% to £755 million (2011/12: £870 million).
The net interest charge for the year was £4 million, down
£6 million on the prior period. A breakdown of this is
shown below.
Profit before tax declined by 13.3% to £691 million. After
removing the impact of exceptional items and fair value
remeasurements, adjusted pre-tax profit declined by
11.4% to £715 million.
Profit after tax for the period was £564 million (2011/12: £639
million). This resulted in the Group recording a basic EPS of
24.1p in the year (2011/12: 27.5p).
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
To watch a video interview with Karen Witts, go to
www.kingfisher.com/KarenWittsPrelims13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
18
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Trading Review by Major Geography
France
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
% LFL
Change
France 4,194 4,470 (6.2)% 0.3% (1.6)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
France 397 423 (6.3)% 0.2%
France includes Castorama and Brico Dépôt.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies.
Kingfisher France
Kingfisher France sales grew by 0.3% to £4.2 billion (-1.6% LFL)
in slower markets. Two net new stores were opened and five
were revamped, adding around 2% new space.
Retail profit grew by 0.2%, broadly in line with sales growth.
Gross margins were up 10 basis points reflecting on-going self-
help initiatives offsetting some investment in pricing. Costs were
tightly controlled and also reflect lower levels of variable pay
during the year.
Castorama total sales grew by 2.0% to £2.3 billion
(-0.5% LFL). According to Banque de France data, sales for
the home improvement market were down 0.8%. Castorama
outperformed the market benefiting from its innovative ‘Do-it-
Smart’ approach aimed at making home improvement projects
easier for customers.
Brico Dépôt, which more specifically targets trade professionals
and heavy DIYers, was impacted by a slower house building
market, with new housing starts and planning consent data
(1)
down around 18% and 9% respectively. Total sales declined by
1.7% to £1.9 billion (-2.8% LFL). Self-help initiatives progressed
well, including new ranges introduced last year (e.g. heating
and joinery ranges) and more ‘arrivages’ promotions (rolling
programmes of one-off special buys), reinforcing Brico Dépôt’s
value credentials.
(1)
Ministry of Housing February 2012-January 2013.
UK & Ireland
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Currency
Change 52
week basis
(1)
% LFL
Change
UK &
Ireland 4,316 4,338 (0.5)% (2.0)% (5.2)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
UK &
Ireland 234 271 (13.7)% (13.8)%
UK & Ireland includes B&Q in the UK & Ireland and Screwfix in the UK.
(1) In the UK & Ireland Kingfisher reports each financial year up to
the nearest Saturday to 31 January. This year this has resulted in
a 53 week year.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies and % movements on
a 52 week basis.
Kingfisher UK & Ireland
Kingfisher UK & Ireland total sales were down 2.0% to £4.3
billion (-5.2% LFL) in a declining market impacted by weak
consumer confidence and record adverse summer weather.
Retail profit declined by 13.8% to £234 million.
B&Q UK & Ireland’s total sales were down 3.6% (-5.6% LFL)
to £3.7 billion reflecting the difficult UK backdrop and a
particularly challenging environment in Ireland, where our nine
stores incurred losses of £7 million and are now subject to an
Examinership process.
The market
(1)
for the UK’s leading home improvement retailers
was down around 3%, including seasonal ranges down 9%.
On a comparable basis, B&Q outperformed the market, with
sales down around 2%.
Sales of outdoor seasonal products were down around 9%
with average footfall down 20% in the severely weather-affected
weeks. Sales of building products were also impacted by the
adverse weather. Sales of indoor decorative products fared
better as customers switched some of their home improvement
activities indoors. Cash sales
(2)
of showroom (kitchens,
bathrooms and bedrooms) products were slightly higher year
on year, showing that the new Every Day Low Prices (EDLP)
trading strategy in this category is starting to gain traction with
customers in a challenging market.
Retail profit declined by 20.8% to £187 million. Gross margins
were down 20 basis points, with the benefits from ongoing self-
help initiatives offset by some additional promotional activity, the
decision to accelerate clearance ahead of the national rollout of
new ranges of tiling and décor products, and a higher mix of
‘TradePoint’ sales.
19
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
TradePoint continues to progress well. Sales to TradePoint
customers were up around 20% and now account for nearly
20% of total store sales. Over 1.2 million customers have now
registered as TradePoint customers, with around a third having
shopped in the last month.
A strong focus on operating cost efficiencies continued. Costs
also reflect lower levels of variable pay this year and the benefit
of a settlement of a one-off construction related claim for around
£5 million.
Screwfix grew total sales by 9.8% to £577 million, despite the
challenging smaller tradesman market
(3)
, benefiting from the
continued rollout of new outlets, the success of ‘click, pay &
collect’ and a redesigned catalogue. Sixty new outlets were
opened, taking the total to 275.
Retail profit was up 33.9% to £47 million, reflecting the strong
sales growth, gross margins benefiting from on-going self-help
initiatives and continued tight cost control.
UK reporting
B&Q and Screwfix are increasingly operating together, sharing a
distribution network, jointly developing several major initiatives,
including omnichannel, the provision of energy efficiency
products and services and adopting a complementary strategy
for UK growth. As a result, from next year (2013/14) reporting
in the UK will mirror our current practice in France and provide
one overall profit figure along with a commentary on the sales
performance of each major business.
(1) Kingfisher estimate for the UK RMI (Repairs, Maintenance &
Improvement) market – incorporates GfK data, which includes
new space but which excludes B&Q Ireland and private retailers
e.g. IKEA, and other smaller independents. It is on a cash sales
basis and is adjusted for discounts.
(2) Cash sales are recognised as sales when the products are delivered
to the customer.
(3) Based on the Builders’ Merchants Federation lightside data Jan-Dec
2012 and includes new space, down 0.4%.
Other International
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
% LFL
Change
Other
International 2,063 2,023 2.0% 6.6% (0.7)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
Other
International 150 188 (19.8)% (14.3)%
Other International includes Poland, China, Spain, Russia, Turkey JV and
Hornbach in Germany.
Joint Venture (Koçtas¸ JV) and Associate (Hornbach) sales are not consolidated.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies.
Other International total sales increased by 6.6% to
£2.1 billion (-0.7% LFL) supported by new store openings and
strong growth in Russia, now the second largest business in
the division. However, with the exception of Russia, economic
uncertainty in Europe impacted LFL sales and profitability.
Retail profit declined by 14.3% to £150 million.
During the year seven net new stores were opened adding
around 3% new space. Three stores were opened in both
Poland and Spain, one in both Russia and Turkey and one
store rationalisation in China.
In Poland and Spain sales grew reflecting new store space,
however both markets were impacted by weak consumer
confidence. Sales in Poland were up 0.6% (-5.1% LFL) to
£1,029 million. Gross margins were down 110 basis points, with
self-help initiatives offset by some investment in pricing. Tight
cost control more than offset cost inflation resulting in a 15.3%
decline in retail profit to £107 million. Sales in Spain grew by
3.0% (-6.8% LFL) to £234 million. Retail profit was £1 million,
down from £7 million reported last year, reflecting the difficult
market and higher pre-opening costs after the resumption of
new store openings.
In Russia sales grew by 38.3% in a strong market to £426 million
(+17.9% LFL) benefiting from new store openings. Retail profit
was £16 million, compared to £2 million reported in 2011/12.
In Turkey, Kingfisher’s 50% JV, Koçta s¸, grew sales by 4.1%
(-4.1% LFL) reflecting one new store opening offset by a slower
economic environment and the impact of poor weather early in
the year. Retail profit contribution was £9 million, down 28.2%
year on year.
Hornbach, in which Kingfisher has a 21% economic interest,
contributed £26 million to retail profit, down 15.2% on last year
reflecting a £5 million loss in Q1 and a weaker market in Q4.
B&Q China sales declined by 0.8% (+0.1% LFL) to £374 million
reflecting one less store compared to last year. The retail loss
was £9 million (2011/12: £3 million reported loss) after reflecting
around £3 million of costs relating to the new format store trial.
Interest
Net interest has decreased by £6 million in the year. The
breakdown is as follows:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Underlying net interest (6) (12)
Financing fair value remeasurements (FFVR)
(1)
2 2
Statutory net interest (4) (10)
(1) FFVR represents changes in the fair value of financing derivatives,
excluding interest accruals, offset by fair value adjustments to the
carrying value of borrowings and other hedged items under fair value
hedge relationships.
Underlying net interest has fallen by £6 million driven by a fall in
interest on net debt as a result of the repayment of €200 million
(£162 million) EMTN
(2)
in November 2012 and from a full year’s
benefit of buying back debt in 2011/12. This was offset by an
increase in the net pensions interest cost, principally due to a
reduction in the asset return assumption.
(2) Euro Medium Term Note.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
20
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Taxation
Kingfisher’s effective tax rate is sensitive to the blend of tax rates
and profits in the Group’s various jurisdictions. The adjusted
effective rate of tax, calculated on profit before exceptional
items, prior year tax adjustments and the impact of rate
changes is 27% (2011/12: 28%). This is higher than the UK
statutory rate because of the amount of Group profit that is
earned in higher tax jurisdictions and because no future benefit
is assumed for losses incurred in overseas jurisdictions such
as China and Ireland. The overall tax rate for the year is 18%
(2011/12: 20%) reflecting the impact on deferred tax of the
further 2% fall in the UK rate, release of prior year provisions
either reassessed or time expired and a claim for the use of
prior year losses of £33 million.
Effective tax rate
calculation
Profit
£m
Tax
£m
2012/13
%
2011/12
%
Profit before tax and tax
thereon 691 127 18 20
Add exceptional loss
and tax thereon 26 1
Less prior year items – 66
Total – adjusted 717 194 27 28
The effective rate of tax is lower than in 2011/12 as a result of
tax rate changes in some of the countries in which we operate.
The most significant changes were the UK statutory tax rate
falling from 26% to 24% offset by increased levels of costs for
which no tax relief is available in France.
The tax rates for this financial year and the expected rates for
next year are as follows:
Jurisdiction
Statutory tax rate
2013/14
Statutory tax rate
2012/13
UK 23% 24%
France 34.4% – 36.1% 34.4% – 36.1%
Poland 19% 19%
Rest of Europe 0% – 34% 0% – 34%
Asia 16.5% – 25% 16.5% – 25%
Tax contribution
Kingfisher makes a major contribution to the economies of each
country in which it operates including the taxes that it both pays
to and collects for governments. The Group has borne cash
taxes on its profits, properties, in employing its workforce, in
environmental levies, in customs and fuel duties as well as
bearing other local taxes. The level of corporate income tax
paid is detailed in the consolidated cash flow statement,
whilst further information regarding the corporate income
tax expense is contained within note 9. The most significant
of the taxes collected are sales taxes charged to customers
(VAT) on their purchases and employee payroll taxes. Taxes
paid and taxes collected together represent Kingfisher’s total
tax contribution which is shown below:
2012/13
£bn
2011/12
£bn
Taxes borne 0.70 0.69
Taxes collected 0.90 0.89
Total tax contribution 1.60 1.58
Figure 1
Taxation governance and risk management
The Group’s Code of Conduct applies high standards of
professionalism and integrity as well as a requirement to comply
with applicable laws which underpins the Group’s approach to
tax governance. The Group employs appropriately qualified staff
who are responsible for ensuring tax compliance requirements
are met. Tax matters are reviewed by the Financial Initiatives
Tax and Treasury Committee. Further details of the governance
framework are contained within the Governance report.
Kingfisher’s tax strategy is to manage its tax affairs efficiently
and in a way which enhances shareholder value whilst
balancing the tax risks it faces. Tax risks can arise from changes
in law, differences in interpretation of law, changes in tax rates
and the failure to comply with the applicable tax laws and
associated procedures. The Group manages and controls these
risks through local management, its Group tax department and
appropriate advice from reputable professional firms. Where
disputes arise with the tax authorities, the Group addresses
the areas of dispute promptly in a professional, open and
constructive manner.
The Audit Committee and the main Board regularly review the
management and control of its tax affairs and related tax risks.
Exceptional items
2012/13
£m
(Charge)/
gain
2011/12
£m
(Charge)/
gain
Ireland restructuring (21) –
UK restructuring (16) 2
Net pension gain 11 –
UK ex-Focus stores acquisition integration – (11)
Loss on disposal of properties – (3)
(26) (12)
Tax on exceptional items 1 7
Net exceptional items (25) (5)
In the year the Group booked a net post-tax exceptional charge
of £25 million (2011/12: £5 million charge).
Total value of taxes borne
Employers
social security
Business rates
Corporation tax
Other taxes
(including
customs duty)
£0.7bn
21
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Following a sustained decline in trading at B&Q Ireland, the
Group undertook a detailed review of its Irish operations and as
a result, B&Q Ireland entered into an Examinership process in
January 2013. The £21 million restructuring charge represents
provisions recorded for the impairment of properties and
estimated costs of exiting leases and other closure activities.
Around £13 million of this cost will result in a cash outflow, of
which around £11 million will be in 2013/14.
The UK restructuring net charge of £16 million principally
reflects the streamlining of B&Q UK & Ireland’s store support
office and its kitchen, bathroom and bedroom business as well
as IT services. It also includes a £4 million release (2011/12:
£2 million) of an onerous property contract provision for idle
stores either sublet or exited in the period, which had previously
been included as part of the B&Q UK store closure and
downsizing programme in 2005/06.
Netted against these charges is a net pensions accounting
credit of £11 million (2011/12: £nil), see the pensions section
below for details.
Tax on exceptional items amounts to a credit of £1 million
(2011/12: £7 million credit).
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) have decreased by 12.4%
to 24.1p (2011/12: 27.5p). On a more comparable basis,
removing the impact of exceptional items, financing fair value
remeasurements and the effect of prior year tax adjustments,
adjusted basic earnings per share decreased by 11.2% to
22.3p (2011/12: 25.1p).
2012/13 2011/12
Basic earnings per share 24.1p 27.5p
Exceptional items 1.1p 0.5p
Financing fair value remeasurements (net of tax) (0.1)p (0.1)p
Impact of prior year items and exceptional items
on income tax (2.8)p (2.8)p
Adjusted earnings per share 22.3p 25.1p
Dividends
The Board has proposed a final dividend of 6.37p which results
in a full year dividend of 9.46p, an increase of 7.0% (2011/12:
8.84p). The final dividend reduces full year dividend cover on
adjusted earnings to 2.4 times (2011/12: 2.8 times).
Going forward the Group will aim to move towards a medium
term annual dividend cover of around 2.5 times. At this level,
the Board believes the dividend will continue to be prudently
covered by earnings and free cash flow and remain consistent
with the capital needs of the business.
From 2013/14 the Group will also move away from the
mechanistic calculation of the interim dividend as 35 per cent
of the previous year’s total dividends and instead set both
the interim and final dividend by reference to the current
year’s earnings.
The full year dividend will continue to be proposed each year
as part of the full year preliminary announcement in March.
The final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 will be
paid on 17 June 2013 to shareholders on the register at close of
business on 10 May 2013, subject to approval of shareholders
at the Annual General Meeting, to be held on 13 June 2013. A
dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) is available to shareholders
who would prefer to invest their dividends in the shares of the
Company. The shares will go ex-dividend on 8 May 2013. For
those shareholders electing to receive the DRIP the last date for
receipt of electing is 24 May 2013.
Economic Returns
Management are focused on Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
as our main measure of return on capital. KEP is derived from
the concept of Economic Value Added and is used to ensure
capital is being used productively and decisions made which
will create value for shareholders. KEP takes into account a
charge for the capital employed in the business. In doing this
the calculation treats leases as though they were owned assets
within capital employed, capitalising them using the long-term
yield methodology. For the purposes of the calculation, adjusted
post-tax profit is used, but interest and property lease costs are
added back. A charge for the cost of capital employed is then
deducted by applying the Group’s lease adjusted weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) to its lease and pension adjusted
capital employed.
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Decrease
£m
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP) 44 131 (87)
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
22
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Geographic divisional return
Kingfisher’s underlying KEP by geographic division is set out
below. The divisional invested capital excludes central goodwill
of £2.4 billion.
Returns £m KEP
Sales
£bn
Proportion
of Group
sales
%
Invested
Capital
(IC)
£bn
Proportion
of Group
IC% 2012/13 2011/12
UK 4.3 41% 6.0 48% (5) 32
France 4.2 39% 2.2 18% 150 166
Other
International 2.1 20% 1.4 12% 37 59
Goodwill &
Central n/a n/a 2.4 22% (138) (126)
Total 10.6 12.0 44 131
Free cash flow
A reconciliation of free cash flow and cash flow movement in net
debt/cash is set out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Operating profit (before exceptional items) 721 819
Other non-cash items
(1)
261 274
Change in working capital (178) (187)
Pensions and provisions (before exceptional items) (42) (54)
Operating cash flow 762 852
Net interest paid (4) (8)
Tax paid (129) (148)
Gross capital expenditure (before strategic investments) (316) (338)
Disposal of assets 17 9
Free cash flow 330 367
Dividends paid (221) (178)
Share purchase for employee incentive schemes – (117)
Strategic capex investments
(2)
– Freehold interests – (73)
– Ex-Focus DIY stores – (39)
Other
(3)
(10) (17)
Cash flow movement in net cash/(debt) 99 (57)
Opening net (debt)/cash (88) 14
Other movement including foreign exchange 27 (45)
Closing net cash/(debt) 38 (88)
(1) Includes depreciation and amortisation, impairment losses, share-based
compensation charge, share of post-tax results of JVs and associates,
pension service cost and profit/loss on retail disposals.
(2) Investments of a one-off nature, such as bolt on acquisitions and buy
outs of freeholds in existing leased stores.
(3) Includes dividends received from JVs and associates, business
acquisitions, issue of shares and exceptional items (excluding
property disposals).
Net cash at the end of the year was £38 million (2011/12:
£88 million net debt).
Free cash flow of £330 million was generated in the year,
a decline of £37 million year-on-year primarily due to the
reduced profit generation offset by lower capital expenditure.
During the year free cash flow generated was utilised to improve
shareholder returns with the dividend being increased to
£221 million.
In the prior year we invested additional funds outside of our
normal ‘free cash flow’ with £112 million allocated to strategic
capex investments and £117 million on acquiring our own
shares to match employee incentive schemes. The strategic
capex spend included £73 million in the UK where we had
actively decided to purchase freeholds already occupied and
£39 million on the acquisition of 29 Focus stores.
The Group will maintain a high focus on free cash flow
generation going forward to maintain its solid investment grade
balance sheet, fund investment where economic returns
are attractive and pay healthy dividends to shareholders.
Capital expenditure
Gross capital expenditure for the year was £316 million
(2011/12: £450 million). A total of £17 million of proceeds from
disposals were received during the year (2011/12: £9 million).
As detailed last year the Group has a rigorous approach to
capital allocation and authorisation. The process includes:
An annual strategic planning process based on detailed
medium term plans for all businesses for the next four years.
This process drives the key strategic capital allocation
decisions and the output is reviewed by the Board;
A capital approval process through a capital expenditure
committee, attended by the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, CEO Group Productivity and Development,
Group Property Director, Group General Counsel. The
committee is delegated to review all projects above £0.75
million and to sign-off the projects between £0.75 million
and £15.0 million (including the capitalised value of
lease commitments);
Projects above £15.0 million are required to be approved by
the Board although all projects above £0.75 million are also
notified to the Board;
Clear investment criteria including KEP and NPV (Net Present
Value) and challenging hurdle rates for IRR (Internal Rate of
Return) and DPB (Discounted PayBack);
An annual post-investment review process to undertake a
full assessment of all projects above £0.75 million which
were completed in the last two to four years. The findings of
this exercise are considered by both the capital expenditure
committee and the Board and used to inform the
assumptions for similar project proposals going forward.
An annual review of KEP by store is performed which drives
plans to improve the returns of weaker stores.
23
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Financial risk management
Kingfisher’s treasury function has primary responsibility for
managing certain financial risks to which the Group is exposed,
details of which are provided in note 24 of the accounts.
Management of balance sheet and liquidity risk
and financing
The Group finished the year with £38 million of net cash on the
balance sheet. However, the Group’s overall leverage is more
significant when including capitalised lease debt that in
accordance with accounting regulations does not appear on the
balance sheet. The ratio of the Group’s lease adjusted net debt
(capitalising leases at 8 times annual rent) to adjusted EBITDAR
is 2.4 times as at the year end. At this level the Group has
financial flexibility whilst retaining an efficient cost of capital.
A reconciliation of lease adjusted net debt to EBITDAR is set
out below.
2012/13
£m
EBITDA
(1)
987
Property operating lease rentals 435
EBITDAR 1,422
Financial (net cash) (38)
Pension position –
Property operating lease rentals (8x)
(2)
3,480
Lease adjusted net debt 3,442
Lease adjusted net debt to EBITDAR 2.4x
(1) Calculated as Retail profit less central costs and before depreciation
and amortisation.
(2) Kingfisher believes 8x is a reasonable industry standard for estimating the
economic value of its leased assets.
Kingfisher aims to maintain its solid investment grade
credit rating whilst investing in the business where economic
returns are attractive and paying a healthy annual dividend to
shareholders. After satisfying these key aims and taking into
account the economic and trading outlook any surplus capital
would be returned to shareholders.
Where appropriate Kingfisher may purchase current leasehold
assets used by the Group. This may increase financial debt but
should have no material impact on lease adjusted net debt.
Kingfisher regularly reviews the level of cash and debt facilities
required to fund its activities. This involves preparing a prudent
cash flow forecast for the next three years, determining the
level of debt facilities required to fund the business, planning
for repayments of debt at its maturity and identifying an
appropriate amount of headroom to provide a reserve
against unexpected outflows.
The Group derives around half its profit from the eurozone,
and as such is exposed to economic conditions in the member
states. The Group continues to monitor potential exposures and
risks, and develop effective risk management solutions.
Kingfisher has a £200 million committed bank facility maturing
in August 2016, which remained undrawn at the year end.
Kingfisher deposits surplus cash with a number of banks with
the strongest short-term credit ratings and with money market
funds which have the strongest, AAA, credit rating and offer
same day liquidity. A credit limit for each bank or fund is agreed
by the Board covering the full value of deposits and a proportion
of the value of derivative contracts. The credit risk is reduced
further by spreading the investments and derivative contracts
across several counterparties. At the year end, the Group had
a total of around £400 million of cash deposited with banks and
in money market funds. The highest single cash investment was
a £32 million money market fund investment.
The maturity profile of Kingfisher’s debt is illustrated at:
http://www.kingfisher.com/index.asp?pageid=76
The terms of the US Private Placement note agreement and
the committed bank facility require only that the ratio of Group
operating profit, excluding exceptional items, to net interest
payable must be no less than 3:1 for the preceding 12 months
at half year and full year ends. At the year end the Group’s ratio
was significantly higher than this requirement.
The Group has entered into interest rate derivative contracts
to convert the fixed rate payable on its bonds and US Private
Placement notes to a floating rate of interest. The floating
interest rates paid by the Group under its financing
arrangements are based on LIBOR and EURIBOR plus a
margin. The margins were not changed during the year.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
24
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are:
To safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going
concern and retain financial flexibility in order to continue
to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other
stakeholders; and
To maintain a solid investment grade credit rating of BBB.
The Group manages its capital by:
Continued focus on free cash flow generation;
Setting the level of capital expenditure and dividend in the
context of current year and forecast free cash flow generation;
Rigorous review of capital investments and post investment
reviews to drive better returns; and
Monitoring the level of the Group’s financial and leasehold
debt in the context of Group performance and its credit rating.
Kingfisher Insurance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary, is
subject to minimum capital requirements as a consequence of
its insurance activities. The Group complied with the externally
imposed capital requirements during the year.
Property
The Group owns a significant property portfolio, most of which
is used for trading purposes. A valuation was performed for
internal purposes in November 2012 with over one-third of the
portfolio valued by external professional valuers where the key
assumption is the estimated yields. Based on this exercise the
value of this property is £3.6 billion at year end (2011/12: £3.5
billion). This is compared to the net book value of £2.9 billion
(2011/12: £2.8 billion) recorded in the financial statements.
Pensions
The approach used to prepare the pension valuation is in
line with current market practice and international accounting
standards, and has been applied consistently. This accounting
valuation is very sensitive to a number of assumptions and
market rates which are likely to fluctuate in the future. To aid
understanding of the impact that changes to the assumptions
could have on the reported UK pension surplus, we have
included sensitivity analysis as part of the pension disclosure
in note 27. Further details of key assumptions are also
contained within the note.
At the year end, the Group had a net position of £nil
(2011/12: £15 million deficit) in relation to defined benefit
pension arrangements of which a £71 million surplus
(2011/12: £25 million surplus) is in relation to its
UK Scheme.
The decrease in the net deficit was predominantly due to strong
asset returns, more than offsetting a lower real discount rate
used to value the UK pension obligation.
During the year, and following consultation with the active
members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed
to future benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012.
The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. A net
exceptional pensions accounting credit of £11 million has been
recognised. This includes a £27 million non-cash curtailment
gain, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities
as benefits are no longer linked to future salary increases other
than in line with inflation. It is offset by a £16 million charge for
transitional payments to the active members. From July 2012
an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered
to all UK employees, with the reduction in cash contributions
to the final salary scheme offset by higher contributions to the
defined contribution scheme. Auto-enrolment will commence
in the current year.
25
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
BUSINESS REVIEW
Risks
Given the scale of our businesses, the Board of Directors recognises that the nature, scope and potential impact of our key business
and strategic risks is subject to constant change. As such, the Board has implemented the necessary framework to ensure that it
has sufficient visibility of the Group’s key risks and the opportunity to regularly review the adequacy and effectiveness of our
mitigating controls and strategies.
During the year the Board has also considered the nature and level of risk that we are prepared to accept in order to deliver our
business strategies and have reviewed and approved our internal statement of risk appetite. This describes both the current and
desired levels of acceptable risk, supported by high level qualitative risk statements, ensuring that risks are proactively managed to
the level desired by the Board.
The Corporate governance report on page 42 describes the systems and processes through which the directors manage and
mitigate risks. The Board considers that the principal risks to achieving its strategic aims are set out below.
Easier
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Making it easier for
our customers to improve
their home
We fail to deliver demand and value
through the “easier” initiatives due to a
lack of rigorous change management
disciplines, capabilities and resources.
Across our markets we are committed to ensuring that our stores and online
fulfilment channels are aligned with our desire to optimise our customers’
retail experience. To support this we continue to evolve and innovate across
our product ranges, formats and customer offer.
Changes are, however, only implemented once we have completed an
appropriate level of planning and testing, relative to the risk, and we have
ensured that the assumptions and insight, that support the introduction of
new products or services, will deliver the benefits to both our customers and
our shareholders prior to their introduction.
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Giving our customers
more ways to shop
We fail to invest in the systems and
supply chain platforms necessary to
maintain either competitive parity or
advantage, amongst online or
omnichannel competitors.
Across our businesses we recognise both the threats and opportunities
presented by omnichannel retailing and are taking the necessary steps to
ensure we remain competitive in our respective markets. This is supported
by a significant investment programme across our systems and supply
chain architectures. This includes significant investments in:
Warehouse management, forecasting and replenishment technologies
to ensure we maximise operational agility and optimise the flow of product
in order to meet customer demand.
Optimising distribution and logistics platforms to ensure we can deliver
products via the most efficient routes to market.
The delivery of leading edge web architectures and platforms to provide
a compelling online offer including the options to deliver enhanced
‘click, pay and collect’ functionality, across smart phone and tablet
based applications.
Common
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Building innovative
common brands
We fail to unlock the potential to
generate further shareholder value
through the optimisation of combined
purchasing and commercial synergies,
while retaining accountability at our
Operating Companies.
The development of common brands and synergies remains a priority
across the organisation. To ensure that we maximise the opportunities
to deliver the differentiation of product ranges with competitors, through
innovative and exclusive product, and to increase and maximise scale
efficiencies we:
Are implementing high quality analytic technologies to ensure that we
understand our buying behaviours, habits and product insight across all
of our businesses and that we are able to identify specific opportunities
to drive the optimal, and most profitable, outcomes from our common
buying decisions.
Have set up a common projects team to identify the optimum
opportunities for implementing common products across the Group.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
26
BUSINESS REVIEW
Risks continued
Expand
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Growing our presence
in existing markets
Our investments in new store formats
and customer proposition strategies
fail to stimulate increased consumer
spend and do not deliver the desired
return to top line like-for-like growth
in our mature markets.
Uncertainty surrounding the resilience
of the global economy and volatility in
the Eurozone continues to impact both
consumer confidence and the long
term sustainability and capabilities of
our supplier base.
Despite the ongoing challenges of global austerity programmes and
their impact on consumer confidence, we are committed to re-investing
in our mature markets to maintain market share and to ensure
market leadership.
We continue to invest in our existing store portfolio whilst seeking to
minimise its cost base and optimise sales densities. Where there are
opportunities to expand and innovate we will do so using a combination
of existing and new formats, and try low risk market entry and new flexible
store format strategies based on the utilisation of current Operating
Company skills and resources.
With continuing market volatility and uncertainty across all of the
economies in which we operate, particularly within the Eurozone, we
continue to monitor potential exposures and risks and provide effective
risk management solutions to both our businesses and our strategic
suppliers. These include:
The provision of supply chain finance programmes to support
strategic suppliers.
Support from a strong portfolio of international banking partners with the
strongest short term credit rating that provide flexibility, diversification of
cash holdings, access to funding and reliable local retail cash and card
payment processing services.
An appropriate and prudent mix of hedging policies, cash deposits and
debt financing to minimise the impact of foreign exchange currency
volatility on the Group.
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Expand in new and
developing markets
We lack the necessary agility
and capability to identify, assess
and take advantage of potential
opportunities for overseas expansion
and market penetration strategies
for existing markets.
We continually review and assess opportunities for expansion, in terms of
both online and bricks and mortar retail, across all of the territories and
regions in which we operate.
Country and market entry strategies are based on the application of a
proven operating model and supported by the Operating Company with the
most relevant experience, capabilities and capacity to successfully lead a
market entry strategy.
We also ensure that any proposed acquisition or market entry strategy is
subject to an appropriate level of challenge and due diligence from both
the Group Executive and specialist Group functions which may include the
Tax, Treasury, Legal, Group Finance and Group Risk and Internal Audit
functions. This due diligence is also supported by external and
independent advisors when necessary.
One Team
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Developing leaders
and connecting people
We do not make the necessary
investment in our people to ensure that
we have the appropriate calibre of staff,
skills and experience.
Across our businesses we are developing our talent, building our
leadership capability and connecting our people through intelligent
networks. Specific examples of this include:
The continued investment in development of our senior leaders
through the Kingfisher ‘One Academy’, including the 2020 Leadership
Programme and the development of networks across our businesses.
Focused development activities for our store-based colleagues, including
the roll out of national apprenticeship schemes across our UK and
French businesses, and an increased focus on how we support and
recognise the role of our customer advisors across the organisation.
Recognition of the importance of ensuring a constant flow of
developing talent through structured graduate and management trainee
programmes, providing sustainable career development paths supported
by new and innovative reward and bonus frameworks.
27
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Operational Risks
Risk Mitigation
Pricing A lack of perceived price
competitiveness, particularly when
compared to more discount based
or online competitors, would affect
our ability to maintain or grow
market share.
Significant investment in pricing to reinforce and communicate our
value credentials.
This is supported by:
The use of improved customer insight and analytical tools to optimise
product ranging and pricing strategies
Increased margin flexibility through partnerships with strategic vendors
and the leveraging of Group buying opportunities
More targeted use of online and mass media tools to communicate and
reinforce price perception (for example, price comparison websites, such
as kitchen-compare.com and bathroomcompare.com in the UK).
Risk Mitigation
Key supplier resilience
and continuity
Key product suppliers lacking the
necessary resilience or disaster
recovery capabilities to manage the
impact of on-going global economic
volatility or the increasing impacts of
extreme weather cycles and patterns
on their operations and extended
supply chains.
We continue to support our strategic suppliers through a combination of
relationship management, and ongoing supplier vulnerability assessments,
supported by supplier financing programmes where appropriate.
We also proactively look to ensure continuity of supply through the
expansion of our own brand programmes and dual sourcing strategies
where possible and commercially viable. On-going investment in our
sourcing offices outside of the Far East, notably in Poland and Turkey,
also provides increased flexibility for our sourcing strategies.
Risk Mitigation
Health & safety We fail to maintain a safe environment
for our customers and store colleagues
which results in a major incident or
fatality that is directly attributable to
a failure in our Health & Safety
management systems.
With 78,000 employees and millions of customers visiting our stores
each week, robust health and safety systems are a priority. The Board is
committed to creating and sustaining a safe environment for both our staff
and customers and regularly reviews and challenges Health & Safety
performance, standards and targets across our businesses.
As regulatory requirements vary from country to country, each operating
company is required to designate a director with specific responsibility
for health and safety. This person is then responsible for ensuring that a
written health and safety policy is communicated and that appropriate
health and safety arrangements are in place to protect our employees and
customers and that we comply with local regulatory requirements.
Compliance is monitored across our businesses through a programme of
self-certification and Health & Safety audits, with issues reported through
local Audit Committees and escalated to the Group Executive or Board
where necessary.
Risk Mitigation
Environmental or ethical
failure
Impact on Kingfisher’s reputation
and brand arising from a major
environmental or ethical failure, a
significant corporate fraud or material
non-compliance with legislative or
regulatory requirements resulting in
punitive or custodial procedures.
Both employees and suppliers working for or with Kingfisher must conduct
themselves according to our minimum standards of ethics and behaviours
as defined by our Code of Conduct. Responsibility for compliance with
our Code of Conduct rests with each Group Operating Company Chief
Executive and appropriate resources are available to our businesses to
ensure that both staff and suppliers are aware of, and comply with, the
code and our businesses can manage the legislative or regulatory
challenges presented by their respective jurisdictions.
Our commitment to sustainability remains a key value for Kingfisher and
across the organisation we continue to ensure that we engage with our key
environmental partners and stakeholders to ensure that, where possible,
we integrate sustainable practices into our business models and our
property, logistics and distribution strategies.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
28
GOVERNANCE
Board of directors
The Board is made up of a non-executive Chairman, four executive directors and six non-executive
directors who have overall collective responsibility for the direction of the Company. The role and
composition of the Board is set out on page 35.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
Current directorships: Joined the Board as Deputy
Chairman in May 2006 before being appointed
Chairman on 3 June 2009. He is President of
Provestis, his own investment company, and since
January 2010 has been Chairman of MAF Retail
Group, Dubai. He has also been Senior Advisor of
Towerbrook Capital Partners since October 2010.
He is a non-executive director of Alcatel Lucent and
Capgemini and Phase Eight Ltd. He is also President
of the HEC Business School Foundation in Paris and a
member of the Advisory Board of HEC.
Expertise and experience: Daniel provides
considerable retailing experience and expertise
to the Kingfisher Board. He was Chairman and
Chief Executive of Carrefour, the Paris-based retail
group and the world’s second largest retailer, from
1992 to 2005. Prior to Carrefour, he was Chief
Operating Officer of METRO, Germany’s leading
international retailer.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in June
2000 and as Group Chief Executive in January 2008.
He is also a non-executive director of Whitbread plc,
lead non-executive member on the Department for
Work and Pensions Board, member of the Prince of
Wales Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change,
and a Member of the Business Disability Forum
President’s Group. In October 2012, Ian became
the Chairman of the British Retail Consortium.
Expertise and experience: Ian was previously
Chief Executive, B&Q UK from June 2005. He
was appointed Chief Executive International and
Development in September 2002, Chief Executive of
e-Kingfisher in May 2000 and was Group Director of
Strategy & Development. Before joining Kingfisher he
worked for a number of retail businesses including
Sears plc where he was Group Commercial Director.
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
October 2012.
Expertise and experience: Karen provides additional
recent relevant finance expertise to the Board. She
was previously Chief Financial Officer, Africa, Middle
East, Asia and Asia Pacific for Vodafone plc. From
1999 to 2010 she worked at BT plc, most recently as
Chief Financial Officer, BT Retail and Managing
Director Enterprises and before that as Managing
Director Operations, Openreach. She is a chartered
accountant and has experience in finance and
management roles at companies such as Paribas,
Diageo, Mars Electronics, The Observer newspaper
and Ernst & Whinney.
Andrew Bonfield
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board
in February 2010 and is Chairman of the Audit
Committee. He is Finance Director of National
Grid plc. He is also a Committee member of the
Hundred Group of Finance Directors.
Expertise and experience: Andrew brings significant
current finance experience to the Kingfisher Board.
He was previously Chief Financial Officer of Cadbury
plc and prior to that he was Chief Financial Officer of
Bristol-Myers Squibb from 2002 to 2007, Finance
Director of BG Group plc from 2001 to 2002 and
Chief Financial Officer of SmithKline Beecham Plc
from 1999 to 2000 during an 11 year period with the
pharmaceuticals group.
Pascal Cagni
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
November 2010. He is a non-voting director of the
supervisory board of Vivendi.
Expertise and experience: Pascal provides the
Board with expertise in the field of digital and online
retailing. Until recently, he was Vice President and
General Manager of Apple Europe, Middle East,
India and Africa, and was with Apple for ten years in a
variety of roles. His previous experience includes roles
at NEC, Compaq and Booz Allen Hamilton. He also
held the position of non-executive director on the
board of Egg Banking plc, from 2002 to 2006 and on
the board of Atari, the computer games company.
Clare Chapman
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board
in December 2010 and is Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee. She is currently Group
People Director of BT plc and is on the Advisory
Board of the Judge Institute, the Business School
of the University of Cambridge.
Expertise and experience: Clare brings significant
human resources expertise to the Kingfisher board.
She was previously the Director General of Workforce
for the NHS and Social Care, and was also a non-
executive director of TUI Travel plc and Chairman of
its Remuneration Committee. Her previous experience
also includes Group HR director of Tesco plc from
1999 to 2006 and HR Vice President of Pepsi-Cola’s
West and Central European operations from
1994 to 1999.
29
www.king?sher.com
Business review Governance Accounts
Audit Committee
Remuneration Committee
Nomination Committee
See pages 34 to 44 for further details.
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and Koçta s¸ Brands
Current directorships: Kevin was appointed to the
Board as Group Finance Director in October 2008.
He ceased to be Finance Director in September
2012. As CEO, B&Q and Koçtas¸ brands he holds
responsibility for the Group’s businesses in the UK,
Ireland, China, Turkey and the Hornbach investment
in Germany. He is deputy chairman of Koçtas¸
Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. and a member of the
supervisory board of Hornbach Holding AG. He is
Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the
Audit Committee of Land Securities plc.
Expertise and experience: Kevin worked for Dixons
Retail plc from 2002 to 2008 where he was Group
Finance Director. Previously he was European
Finance Director at Quaker Oats Limited. He is a
fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales.
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama and Brico Dépôt Brands
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
October 2012.
Expertise and experience: Philippe was appointed
Kingfisher Divisional CEO of Castorama and Brico
Dépôt after nine years with the Group. He previously
spent four years as Chief Executive of Kingfisher
France, and prior to this he spent five years as
CEO of Castorama France. He holds responsibility
for the Castorama and Brico Dépôt businesses in
France, Poland, Russia and Spain. He previously
held senior roles at DIY retailer Leroy Merlin and
furniture retailer Conforama.
Anders Dahlvig
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
December 2009. He is a director of Oriflame
Cosmetics AB, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB and
Axel Johnson AB; and is Chairman of The New Wave
Group and a member of the Advisory Board of Lund
University Business School. He is also a director of
Resurs Bank AB, and Pret A Manger Limited.
Expertise and experience: Anders brings extensive
commercial retailing expertise to the Board. He was
previously Chief Executive and President of The
IKEA Group from 1999 to 2009, having spent 26
years with the company. Prior to becoming Chief
Executive, he was Vice President of IKEA Europe
from 1997 to 1999 and Managing Director of IKEA
UK from 1993 to 1997.
Janis Kong
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
December 2006. She is a non-executive director of
Portmeirion Group PLC, NetworkRail, VisitBritain and
TUI Travel plc. She is also a non-executive director of
Copenhagen Airports A/S.
Expertise and experience: Janis provides important
operational experience to the Kingfisher Board. She
was previously a non-executive director of The Royal
Bank of Scotland Group Plc and, until her retirement
in March 2006, was a director of BAA plc and
Chairman of Heathrow Airport Ltd for five years as well
as being Chairman of Heathrow Express. Prior to that
she was Managing Director of Gatwick Airport and has
held a number of operational roles within BAA during
her 33-year career with the company.
Mark Seligman
Senior Independent Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
January 2012. He is a non-executive director of BG
Group plc, where he is also chairman of the Audit
Committee. He serves as an alternate member of
the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, a member of
the Regional Growth Fund advisory panel and non-
executive deputy chairman of G4S, where he is also
Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Expertise and experience: Mark provides substantial
expertise to the Kingfisher Board in the field of
finance. He was a senior adviser at Credit Suisse.
He began his career at Price Waterhouse and spent
over 30 years in the City, including senior roles at SG
Warburg, BZW and Credit Suisse First Boston. At
Credit Suisse he was deputy chairman Europe from
1999 to 2005 and later Chairman UK Investment
Banking from 2003 to 2005.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
30
Group Executive
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and
Koçtas¸ brands
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama
and Brico Dépôt brands
Steve Willett
CEO, Group Productivity
and Development
Guy Colleau
CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
GROUP
OPERATING BOARD
11 members
DELIVERY
ONE TEAM
BOARD
25 members
ALIGNMENT
GROUP
EXECUTIVE
6 members
STRATEGY
Véronique Laury
CEO, Castorama France
Group Operating Board
Evelyn Gardiner
Group Human
Resources Director
Martyn Phillips
CEO, B&Q UK & Ireland
Alain Souillard
CEO, Brico Dépôt
brand, International
Marc Ténart
Finance Director, Castorama
and Brico Dépôt brands
One Team Board
Benedikt Benenati
Group Internal
Communications Director
Nick Folland
Group Corporate Affairs
Director: Net Positive
Anthony Sutcliffe
Group Sourcing Director
Ian Playford
Group Property Director
Alp Özpamukçu
CEO, Koçtas¸ Turkey
Clare Wardle
Group General Counsel
John Declerck
Group Strategy Director
Andrew Livingston
CEO, Screw?x
Tanguy Dewavrin
CEO, Castorama Poland
Ian Harding
Group Communications
Director
Pascal Gil
CEO, Brico Dépôt Spain
Christophe Mistou
Group Brands and Product
Development Director
Médéric Payne
CEO, Castorama Russia
Jacques Hayaux du Tilly
CEO, B&Q China
GOVERNANCE
Senior management
In addition to the Kingfisher plc Board,
the Group Executive is responsible for
the overall strategic decision-making
of the Group.
The Group Operating Board, made up of the Group
Executive and five other members, is responsible for the
delivery of the strategy, reviewing our progress against
it and ensuring strategic priorities are fully supported.
The One Team Board, made up of the Group Operating
Board and 14 other members, is responsible for
implementing the strategy and fulfilling our Better Homes,
Better Lives mission at an Operating Company level.
31
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ report
The directors present their report and
audited financial statements for the
financial year ended 2 February 2013.
Principal activities
The Group’s principal activity is selling home improvement
products and services through stores, catalogues and online
channels. Our aim is to make it easier for customers to have
better and more sustainable homes.
Business model
Our unique contribution as a business to our customers is that we
can harness our home improvement experience, our heritage as a
leader in sustainability and our international scale and sourcing
capability to bring new, more sustainable and more profitable
products and services to market. Our business model aims to
generate economic profit and cash by maximising our sales whilst
keeping costs low within our stores, our supply chain and our
central functions.
This model is used to deliver Kingfisher’s Creating the Leader
strategy, which is covered in detail on pages 6 to15.
Business review
The Business Review, which is set out on pages 2 to 27 provides a
comprehensive review of the development, performance and future
prospects of the Group’s operations for the year ended 2 February
2013. The information set out in the Business Review includes the
Group’s Key Performance Indicators, a statement on Corporate
Responsibility, a Financial Review including financial and capital risk,
and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the
Group. These sections are incorporated by reference and deemed to
form part of this report.
Dividends
The directors recommend a final dividend of 6.37p (2011/12:
6.37p) per ordinary share amounting to £151m (2011/12:
£148m) to be paid on 17 June 2013 to members appearing on
the Register at the close of business on 10 May 2013. Together
with the interim dividend of 3.09p (2011/12: 2.47p) per
ordinary share, amounting to £73m (2011/12: £57m), paid on
16 November 2012, the total dividend for the financial year
ended 2 February 2013 will be 9.46p (2011/12: 8.84p) per
ordinary share, amounting to £224m (2011/12: £205m).
The Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust has waived all dividends
payable by the Company in respect of the ordinary shares held
by it. The total dividends waived in the year to 2 February 2013
were in aggregate £3.2m.
Directors
Full biographical details of the current directors are set out on
pages 28 and 29. Philippe Tible and Karen Witts joined the
Board as executive directors on 1 October 2012, and will seek
appointment by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
(‘AGM’) on 13 June 2013. Euan Sutherland joined the Board as an
executive director on 1 October 2012 and resigned from the Board
on 31 January 2013 to join the Co-operative Group as CEO. In
accordance with the principles of the UK Corporate Governance
Code, all directors will retire and be submitted for appointment or
re-appointment at the AGM in 2013.
Directors’ indemnity arrangements
The Company has provided qualifying third-party deeds of
indemnity for the benefit of each director and former director
who held office during the 2012/13 financial year. The
Company has also purchased and maintained Directors’ and
Officers’ liability insurance throughout 2012/13. Neither the
indemnities nor the insurance provides cover in the event that
the director concerned is proved to have acted fraudulently.
Directors’ interests
Details of directors’ remuneration, service contracts and interests
in the Company’s shares and share options are set out in the
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. No director
had a material interest at any time during the year in any derivative
or financial instrument relating to the Company’s shares.
Principal risk identification and management
The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group have been
reviewed by the Board and are shown in the Risks section on
pages 25 to 27. The Risks section also provides information on the
performance of the Board in actively managing those risks, to allow
assessment of how the directors have performed their statutory
duty to promote the success of the Company.
Employees
The commitment of the Group’s employees is vital to
ensure that high standards of customer care and service
are maintained throughout the business. The Group is fully
committed to treating its employees and customers with dignity
and respect, and to valuing diversity. It is Group policy to:
ensure there is no discrimination in employment on the
grounds of race, gender, age, disability, marital status, sexual
orientation or religious belief;
implement measures in stores to ensure a level of customer
service for disabled people equivalent to that offered to non-
disabled people; and
maintain a mechanism which customers and employees can
use to give feedback on the Group’s performance and ensure
that all customer comments are analysed, responded to and
acted upon.
Across the Group, women accounted for 40% of total
employees and 30% of managers in 2012/13. B&Q UK
continued its long-established policy of promoting age diversity,
with around a quarter of its employees aged over 50.
The Group’s statement on employee development is set out in the
People section of the Company’s website, and details of employee
involvement through participation in share incentive schemes are
contained in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59.
There are a number of communication channels in place to
help employees to develop their knowledge of, and enhance
their involvement with, the Group. These channels include
engagement surveys, briefing groups, internal magazines and
newsletters that report on business performance and objectives,
community involvement and other applicable issues. Directors
and senior management regularly visit stores and discuss
matters of current interest and concern with employees.
Corporate responsibility
Details of the Group’s corporate responsibility policy and
operations are set out on page 16.
Charitable donations
Kingfisher and its subsidiaries made contributions to
charity/community projects worth an estimated £2.4m
(2011/12: £1.8m) during the financial year ended 2 February
2013, equivalent to 0.3% of adjusted pre-tax profits. This
included cash donations (£1.6m) and gifts-in-kind (£0.5m –
with product donations at cost price). Support was also given
through the donation of time by employees (£0.3m).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
32
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Report continued
Political donations
The Board annually seeks and obtains shareholders’ approval
to enable the Group to make donations or incur expenditure in
relation to EU political parties, other political organisations or
independent election candidates under section 366 of the
Companies Act 2006.
The Group made no political donations during the year
(2011/12: £nil). As with previous annual approvals, the Group
has no intention of changing its current policy and practice of
not making political donations. The Board seeks the approval
on a precautionary basis to avoid any unintentional breach of
the relevant provisions. Shareholder approval will be sought at
this year’s AGM to renew this authority; further details are
provided in the Notice of AGM.
Supplier payment policy
The Company does not impose standard payment terms on its
suppliers but agrees specific terms with each of them, and then
pays in accordance with those terms. The Group’s UK operating
companies have all signed up to the Prompt Payment Code. On
average, the Company’s suppliers are paid in 45 days.
Significant agreements – change of control
There are a number of agreements that take effect, alter or
terminate upon a change of control of the Company following
a takeover bid, such as bank loan agreements, Medium Term
Note (‘MTN’) documentation, private placement debt and
employee share plans. None of these are deemed to be
significant in terms of their potential impact on the business
of the Group as a whole except for:
the £200 million credit facility dated 8 July 2011 between the
Company, HSBC Bank plc (as the facility agent) and the banks
named therein as lenders, which contains a provision such
that in the event of a change of control any lender may, if
they so require, notify the agent that they wish to cancel their
commitment whereupon the commitment of that lender will be
cancelled and all their outstanding loans, together with accrued
interest, will become immediately due and payable; and
the US$297 million US Private Placement notes, issued
pursuant to a note purchase agreement dated 24 May 2006
by the Company to various institutions, which contains a
provision such that in the event of a change of control, the
Company is required to make an offer to the holders of the
US Private Placement notes to prepay the principal amount
of the notes together with interest accrued.
The Company does not have agreements with any director or
officer that would provide compensation for loss of office or
employment resulting from a takeover, except that provisions of
the Company’s share incentive schemes may cause options and
awards granted under such schemes to vest on a takeover.
Essential contracts
There is no information that the Company would be required to
disclose about persons with whom it has contractual or other
arrangements that are essential to the business of the Company.
Share capital
Details of the Company’s issued share capital are set out in
note 28 to the consolidated financial statements. All of the
Company’s issued ordinary shares are fully paid up and rank
equally in all respects.
The rights and obligations attaching to the Company’s ordinary
shares, in addition to those conferred on their holders by law, are
set out in the Company’s Articles of Association, copies of which
can be obtained from the Company’s website. The holders of
ordinary shares are entitled to receive the Company’s Annual
Report and Accounts, to attend and speak at general meetings of
the Company, to appoint proxies and to exercise voting rights.
There are no restrictions on the transfer of ordinary shares or on
the exercise of voting rights attached to them, except (i) where
the Company has exercised its right to suspend their voting
rights or to prohibit their transfer following the omission of their
holder or any person interested in them to provide the Company
with information requested by it in accordance with Part 22 of
the Companies Act 2006 or (ii) where their holder is precluded
from exercising voting rights by the Financial Services Authority
Listing Rules or the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
The Company has a Sponsored Level 1 American Depositary
Receipt (‘ADR’) programme in the United States.
Authority to allot shares
At the AGM in 2012, shareholders approved a resolution to give the
directors authority to allot shares up to an aggregate nominal value of
£124,107,897. In addition, shareholders approved a resolution to
give the directors authority to allot up to a nominal amount of
£248,215,795 in connection with an offer by way of a rights issue in
accordance with ABI guidance. If this additional allotment authority
were used, the ABI guidance would be followed. The directors have
no present intention to issue ordinary shares, other than pursuant to
employee share incentive schemes. These resolutions remain valid
until the conclusion of this year’s AGM when resolutions will be
proposed to renew these authorities.
Authority to purchase own shares
At the AGM in 2012, shareholders approved a resolution for the
Company to make purchases of its own shares to a maximum
number of 236,933,259 ordinary shares, being approximately
10% of the issued share capital. This resolution remains valid
until the conclusion of this year’s AGM. As at 25 March 2013, the
directors have not used this authority. In order to retain maximum
flexibility, a resolution will be proposed at this year’s AGM to renew
this authority. It is the Company’s current intention that shares
acquired under this authority will be cancelled.
Financial instruments
The Group’s financial risk management objectives and policies
are set out in note 24 to the financial statements on pages
87 to 89. Note 24 also details the Group’s exposure to foreign
exchange, interest, credit and liquidity risks. These notes are
included by reference and form part of this report.
Major shareholders
As at 7 March 2013, the Company was aware of the following
interests in its shares:
Number of
ordinary
shares held
% of total
voting rights
Thornberg Investments Management Inc 194,252,960 8.77%
Templeton Investments Counsel, LLC 197,406,849 8.33%
Capital Research Global Investors 115,655,941 4.88%
Annual General Meeting
The 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Company will be
held on 13 June 2013 at the Hilton London Paddington Hotel,
Paddington at 11.00am. A full description of the business to be
conducted at the meeting is set out in the separate Notice of
Annual General Meeting.
By order of the Board
Paul Moore
Company Secretary
25 March 2013
33
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ statement of responsibility
Going concern
The directors confirm that, after reviewing expenditure
commitments, expected cash flows and borrowing facilities,
they have a reasonable expectation that Kingfisher plc (the
‘Company’) and the Kingfisher Group of companies (the
‘Group’) have adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the next financial year and the foreseeable future.
For this reason they continue to adopt the going concern basis
in preparing these financial statements. Further details of the
Group’s liquidity are detailed in the financial review on page 17.
Disclosure of information to auditors
Each person who is a director at the date of approval of this
report confirms that: so far as he or she is aware, there is no
relevant audit information (as defined by section 418 of the
Companies Act 2006) of which the Company’s auditors are
unaware; and each director has taken all the steps that he
or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make
himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information
and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of
that information.
Responsibility for preparing financial statements
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulations.
UK company law requires the directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors
are required to prepare the Group financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as adopted by the European Union and Article 4 of
the IAS Regulation and have elected to prepare the parent
Company financial statements in accordance with United
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United
Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under
company law the directors must not approve the accounts
unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the
state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the
Company for that period.
In preparing the parent Company financial statements,
the directors are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently;
make judgements and accounting estimates that are
reasonable and prudent;
follow applicable UK Accounting Standards (except where
any departures from this requirement are explained in the
notes to the parent Company financial statements); and
prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
In preparing the Group financial statements in accordance
with IAS 1; ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’, the directors
are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently;
present information, including accounting policies, in a
manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information;
provide additional disclosures when compliance with the
specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and
financial performance; and
make an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as a
going concern.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time
the financial position of the Company and enable them to
ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies
Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets
of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity
of the corporate and financial information included on the
Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Responsibility statement
The directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the
relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or
loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the
consolidation taken as a whole; and
the business review, which is incorporated into the Directors’
Report, includes a fair review of the development and
performance of the business and the position of the Company
and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a
whole, together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that they face.
By order of the Board
Paul Moore
Company Secretary
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
34
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the Company’s Corporate Governance
report for the year ended 2 February 2013. The aim of this
report is to provide a clear and meaningful explanation of the
Company’s governance arrangements, which we consider to
be essential for the long-term success of the Company, and the
promotion of the highest standards of corporate governance.
The Board remains committed to promoting the highest
standards of corporate governance, understanding that an
efficient, challenging and diverse Board is essential to enable
the business to deliver its strategy and shareholders’ long-term
interests, whilst generating stakeholder confidence that the
business is conducting itself in a responsible manner. As part
of its overall governance arrangements, the Company’s Code
of Conduct, which mandates minimum standards of behaviour
for all employees and suppliers, was updated and relaunched
across the Group during the year.
As last year, this report reviews the operation of the Company
by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’)
and a statement of compliance with the Code is set out
opposite. The Company is required to report its compliance
against the revised 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code for
its financial year commencing 3 February 2013, and we are
confident that it will be able to report compliance with the
revisions within our 2013/14 annual report.
This report, together with the Directors’ Report on pages 31 to
32, and the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59,
provides details of how the Company has applied the principles
and complied with the provisions of the Code. A copy of the
Code is available at www.frc.org.uk.
The Board constantly reviews its governance framework,
adjusting where necessary the roles, structure and
accountabilities of its mechanisms of governance. During the
year, the governance structure below the Board and primary
committee level was reviewed. As part of the review the terms
of reference of the Group Executive Committee, the Kingfisher
Capex Committee and the Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury
Committee, were all reviewed and, where necessary, amended
to reflect the operations of those committees and the powers
delegated to them. As part of the review, the Group Executive
Committee will focus on the development of the Group’s
strategy, and its membership was expanded and enhanced.
In addition, a new Group Operating Board was established, and
this committee will focus on the delivery of the Group’s strategy.
The revised Group governance structure, together with an overview
of each of these Committees, is set out on pages 38 to 39.
Maintaining and promoting the highest standards of corporate
governance remains central to my role as Chairman, and I am
pleased to endorse this Corporate Governance Report, which I
believe demonstrates how, through its actions, the Board and its
Committees fulfil their governance responsibilities and embed
good governance practices on an on-going basis.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
25 March 2013
Compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
The Board is required to report on the operations of the
Company by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code
(the ‘Code’), and has reviewed its operations and governance
framework to ensure that they reflect the principles of the
Code. In accordance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing
Authority, the Board confirms that, throughout the year ended
2 February 2013, and as at the date of this report, the
Company has complied with the provisions set out in
Section 1 of the Code, save for as set out below.
Provision D.1.1 provides that grants under long-term incentive
schemes should normally be phased rather than awarded in
one large block.
As reported in our 2011/12 annual report, the Company set
stretching long-term targets for management as part of the
Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy. The
Remuneration Committee approved awards under the
Performance Share Plan of up to 500% of base salary.
The award was higher than the normal award of 200% but
in making it, the Committee took into account the fact that
no further awards would be made under the Plan until the
financial year 2014/15, and felt that it created a better focus
on a single performance period aligned to the next phase of
the Group’s strategy, rather than the more commonly used
overlapping performance periods.
“
AN EFFICIENT, CHALLENGING AND DIVERSE
BOARD IS ESSENTIAL TO ENABLE THE BUSINESS
TO DELIVER ITS STRATEGY AND SHAREHOLDERS’
LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
For a PDF of the Corporate Governance Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
35
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
35
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Leadership
The role of the Board
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the management,
direction and performance of the Group, and leads and
controls the Group’s business. The Board is also responsible
for ensuring appropriate resources are in place to achieve
its strategy and deliver sustainable performance. Through
authorities delegated to its Committees, the Board directs and
reviews the Group’s operations within an agreed framework
of controls, allowing risk to be assessed and managed within
agreed parameters. The Board is collectively accountable to the
Company’s shareholders for the proper conduct and success
of the business.
The Board’s powers are set out in the Company’s Articles of
Association, which are available to view on its website, and
may be amended by a special resolution of its members.
The Board may exercise all powers conferred on it by the
Articles, in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and
other applicable legislation.
The Board has established a formal schedule of matters
reserved for its approval, and has delegated other specific
responsibilities to its princip committees: the Audit,
Remuneration and Nomination Committees. These are clearly
defined within the written terms of reference of the respective
committees. Information on the responsibilities and work of
each of the Board’s committees is set out on pages 40 to 44.
During the year, as part of its annual review process, the matters
reserved for the Board were reviewed, and, where necessary
amended to reflect best practice. The schedule of matters
reserved for the Board includes the consideration and
approval of:
• the Group’s overall strategy, medium-term plans and
annual budgets;
• financial statements and Group dividend policy including
recommendation of the final dividend;
• major acquisitions, disposals and capital expenditure;
• major changes to the capital structure including tax and
treasury management;
• major changes to accounting policies or practices;
• the Group’s corporate governance and compliance
arrangements;
• the system of internal control and risk management policy;
and
• review of management development strategy.
Composition of the Board
The Board is made up of a non-executive Chairman, four
executive directors and six non-executive directors. The current
balance of the Board’s skills, experience and knowledge,
together with regular briefings by executives below Board level,
ensures that views, perceptions and discussions are not
dominated by any one specific view. The composition of the
Board is continually reviewed to ensure it remains suitable for
the needs of the business, and this continues to be the primary
focus of the Nomination Committee.
There is an established, formal, rigorous and transparent
procedure for the selection and appointment of new directors to
the Board, and this is described in the Nomination Committee
Report on page 43. During the year, Kevin O’Byrne stepped
down as Group Finance Director to take up the role of CEO
B&Q and Koçta s¸ brands, and was replaced by Karen Witts,
who joined the Board on 1 October 2012. Euan Sutherland
and Philippe Tible were appointed to the Board as executive
directors on 1 October 2012. Mr Sutherland subsequently
stepped down from the Board on 31 January 2013 ahead of
leaving the Group in March 2013.
At the Annual General Meeting to be held on 13 June 2013,
shareholders will be asked to appoint Karen Witts and Philippe
Tible and, in accordance with Principle B.7.1 of the Code, re-
appoint their fellow directors.
Role of the non-executive directors
Non-executive directors provide a strong, independent and
external insight to the Board and its Committees, and have
a wealth of experience and business knowledge from
other sectors and industries. The terms and conditions of
appointment of each of the non-executive directors are available
for inspection at the Company’s registered office and will also
be available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting.
During the year, the Board considered the independence of
each of the non-executive directors (other than the Chairman,
who was deemed independent by the Board at the date of
his appointment) against the criteria specified in the Code,
and concluded that each remained fully independent of
management and free from any relationship that could
interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.
Role of the Senior Independent Director
Since his appointment in January 2012, Mark Seligman has
acted as Senior Independent Director (‘SID’), supporting the
Chairman, and is available for approach or representation from
significant shareholders who feel they are unable to raise issues
with the Chairman, Group Chief Executive or Group Finance
Director. In accordance with the Financial Reporting Council’s
(‘FRC’) guidelines, the role of the SID is formally set out in
writing, and available on the Company’s website. During the
year, there were no requests from shareholders or other
Board directors for access to the SID.
Roles of the Chairman and Group Chief Executive
There is a clear division of responsibilities between the
Chairman and the Group Chief Executive. As part of its
annual review process, the Board reviewed the written roles
of the Chairman and Group Chief Executive to ensure they
remained compliant with, and took account of, best practice
developments, and were in line with FRC guidance. The
written roles are available to view on the Company’s website.
The Chairman is responsible for the overall operation,
leadership and governance of the Board, setting the tone and
style of Board discussions, and creating the conditions for
overall Board and individual director effectiveness. He is also
responsible for ensuring that all members of the Board develop
an understanding of the views of major shareholders, that there
is an open dialogue with shareholders, and that the Chairmen of
the Board’s princip committees are available to answer
shareholder questions at the Annual General Meeting.
al
al
34
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the Company’s Corporate Governance
report for the year ended 2 February 2013. The aim of this
report is to provide a clear and meaningful explanation of the
Company’s governance arrangements, which we consider to
be essential for the long-term success of the Company, and the
promotion of the highest standards of corporate governance.
The Board remains committed to promoting the highest
standards of corporate governance, understanding that an
efficient, challenging and diverse Board is essential to enable
the business to deliver its strategy and shareholders’ long-term
interests, whilst generating stakeholder confidence that the
business is conducting itself in a responsible manner. As part
of its overall governance arrangements, the Company’s Code
of Conduct, which mandates minimum standards of behaviour
for all employees and suppliers, was updated and relaunched
across the Group during the year.
As last year, this report reviews the operation of the Company
by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’)
and a statement of compliance with the Code is set out
opposite. The Company is required to report its compliance
against the revised 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code for
its financial year commencing 3 February 2013, and we are
confident that it will be able to report compliance with the
revisions within our 2013/14 annual report.
This report, together with the Directors’ Report on pages 31 to
32, and the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59,
provides details of how the Company has applied the principles
and complied with the provisions of the Code. A copy of the
Code is available at www.frc.org.uk.
The Board constantly reviews its governance framework,
adjusting where necessary the roles, structure and
accountabilities of its mechanisms of governance. During the
year, the governance structure below the Board and primary
committee level was reviewed. As part of the review the terms
of reference of the Group Executive Committee, the Kingfisher
Capex Committee and the Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury
Committee, were all reviewed and, where necessary, amended
to reflect the operations of those committees and the powers
delegated to them. As part of the review, the Group Executive
Committee will focus on the development of the Group’s
strategy, and its membership was expanded and enhanced.
In addition, a new Group Operating Board was established, and
this committee will focus on the delivery of the Group’s strategy.
The revised Group governance structure, together with an overview
of each of these Committees, is set out on pages 38 to 39.
Maintaining and promoting the highest standards of corporate
governance remains central to my role as Chairman, and I am
pleased to endorse this Corporate Governance Report, which I
believe demonstrates how, through its actions, the Board and its
Committees fulfil their governance responsibilities and embed
good governance practices on an on-going basis.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
25 March 2013
Compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
The Board is required to report on the operations of the
Company by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code
(the ‘Code’), and has reviewed its operations and governance
framework to ensure that they reflect the principles of the
Code. In accordance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing
Authority, the Board confirms that, throughout the year ended
2 February 2013, and as at the date of this report, the
Company has complied with the provisions set out in
Section 1 of the Code, save for as set out below.
Provision D.1.1 provides that grants under long-term incentive
schemes should normally be phased rather than awarded in
one large block.
As reported in our 2011/12 annual report, the Company set
stretching long-term targets for management as part of the
Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy. The
Remuneration Committee approved awards under the
Performance Share Plan of up to 500% of base salary.
The award was higher than the normal award of 200% but
in making it, the Committee took into account the fact that
no further awards would be made under the Plan until the
financial year 2014/15, and felt that it created a better focus
on a single performance period aligned to the next phase of
the Group’s strategy, rather than the more commonly used
overlapping performance periods.
“
AN EFFICIENT, CHALLENGING AND DIVERSE
BOARD IS ESSENTIAL TO ENABLE THE BUSINESS
TO DELIVER ITS STRATEGY AND SHAREHOLDERS’
LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
For a PDF of the Corporate Governance Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
36
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
The Group Chief Executive, Ian Cheshire, is responsible for all
executive management of the Group’s business, consistent with
the strategy and commercial objectives agreed by the Board.
He leads the Group Executive team in effecting decisions
of the Board and its Committees, and is responsible for the
maintenance and protection of the reputation of the Company
and its subsidiaries. The Group Chief Executive is also
responsible for promoting and conducting the affairs of the
Group with the highest standards of integrity, probity and
corporate governance.
Company Secretary
The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Board and its
committees and, with the consent of the Board, may delegate
responsibility for the management of the committees to
other suitably qualified staff. The Company Secretary is also
responsible for ensuring that correct Board procedures are
followed, and advises the Board on corporate governance
matters. All directors have access to the advice and services
of the Company Secretary, and their appointment and removal
is one of the matters reserved to the Board. The Board also
has access to the Group General Counsel for legal and
compliance advice.
Diversity on the Board
In September 2011, the Board announced its approach to
diversity. The statement, which is available on the Company’s
website, confirmed that the Board is committed to ensuring
directors of the Company possess, and demonstrate a broad
balance of skills, experience, independence, knowledge and
diversity, including gender diversity. During the year, the
Nomination Committee considered the diversity of candidates
short-listed for the role of Group Finance Director before
appointing Karen Witts on 1 October 2012. The Board
believes that balanced and diverse Boards are effective, and
is committed to maximising the benefits of a diverse workforce
to deliver real sustainable benefits for the Group and
its shareholders.
The charts below demonstrate the gender split at Board level,
One Team Leadership Group level, and for the workforce
as a whole.
Effectiveness
Board meetings
The Board holds regular scheduled meetings throughout
the year and holds unscheduled supplementary meetings as
and when necessary. These meetings are structured to allow
open discussion. At each meeting the Board receives certain
regular reports which include an update from the Group Chief
Executive, current trading/finance (including liquidity) reports
from the Group Finance Director, capital expenditure approvals
and reports from the Company Secretary (including governance,
legal, insurance and risk, and corporate responsibility updates)
and people-related updates from the Group Human
Resources Director.
All directors participate in discussing strategy, trading and
financial performance, and risk management of the Group.
Comprehensive briefing papers are circulated to all directors
approximately one week before each meeting in digital format.
Should a director be unable to attend a particular meeting, they
are provided with all relevant briefing papers and are given the
opportunity to discuss any issues with the Chairman or the Group
Chief Executive and, where possible, participate by telephone for
critical discussions and approvals on specific matters.
The Board generally meets at the Group’s head office in London
and holds at least one meeting each year overseas. During the
year under review, the Board held a meeting in Paris, and
reviewed the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands in France,
Poland, Russia and Spain. In addition to its normal meetings,
at least once per year, the Board holds a meeting off site, which
focuses on presentations from the UK executive team and
includes visits to UK stores. During the year, the Board held
two such meetings and visited the Group’s regional Distribution
Centre and a B&Q store in Swindon. It is the Board’s intention
to conduct at least one meeting each year outside the UK in a
country in which the Group operates.
At the request of any non-executive director, the Chairman will
arrange meetings consisting of just the non-executive directors.
During the year, the Chairman and non-executive directors met
without the executive directors, and there were no matters of
concern raised at this meeting.
Board One Team Leadership Group Total workforce
Female 27%
Male 73%
Female 22%
Male 78%
Female 40%
Male 60%
Gender split
37
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
The Chairman maintains regular contact with the Senior
Independent Director and met with each of the non-executive
directors individually as part of the Board evaluation discussions.
Activities during the year
During the year, in addition to its regular business, the Board:
oversaw the development and articulation of the Group’s Net
Positive strategy;
approved the process for the review of the Company’s defined
benefit pension scheme, and approved the curtailment of that
scheme to new members and an enhancement of the
defined contribution scheme;
reviewed the Group’s risk profile and defined the process by
which the risk appetite of the Board would be established;
considered and approved the commencement of the
examinership process for its business in Ireland;
reviewed the Group’s anti-bribery and corruption policies and
procedures to ensure continued compliance with the UK
Bribery Act; and
received regular strategic presentations from management
and held “deep dive” discussions with management of the
Group’s Operating Companies, information technology and
Group sourcing management.
Board evaluation
The Board conducts a review of its performance each year.
During the year under review, the Board evaluated its
effectiveness using an externally facilitated questionnaire and
a series of one-to-one interviews between each director and the
Chairman. The questionnaire was developed by reference to
the topics discussed and recommendations made during the
previous evaluation, and drafted following discussions between
the Chairman, the Company Secretary and the external facilitator,
Lintstock. Responses to the questionnaire were collated and the
output was used by the Chairman in his individual meetings
with directors as part of the evaluation process.
The areas considered during the evaluation were:
Board composition;
Board expertise;
strategic oversight;
risk management and internal control; and
succession planning and human resource management.
The results of the evaluation were considered by the Board at its
meeting in January 2013. No significant issues were highlighted
and the review clearly indicated that the Board continued to
work efficiently and effectively, and that the contribution and
commitment of each director, and their interaction with each
other, was good, and that the non-executive directors offered
robust challenge where appropriate. As a result of the
evaluation, the Board agreed to undertake the following
activities during the 2013/14 financial year:
review the forward business agenda to ensure that there is
sufficient time to focus on common key Group programmes
and initiatives;
maintain oversight of the Group’s performance relative to its
competitors and customer trends; and
increase its exposure to the Group’s senior management
below the Board.
As part of the evaluation process, the Group Chief Executive
carried out a performance review of the executive directors.
In addition, the non-executive directors, led by the Senior
Independent Director, conducted the performance review
of the Chairman in respect of the financial year.
The Board has confirmed that the contribution of each of the
directors continues to be effective and that shareholders should
be supportive of their appointment or re-appointment to the
Board. Biographical details of each director are set out on
pages 28 to 29.
The Board will continue to review its procedures, effectiveness
and development in the year ahead, and the Chairman will use
the output of the most recent Board evaluation in his individual
meetings with directors during the year.
In accordance with Provision B.6.2 of the Code, which requires
Boards to undertake an externally facilitated evaluation at least
every three years, the Board intends to appoint a suitable
independent facilitator during the year to conduct the 2013/14
performance evaluation, and will report on the findings of that
evaluation within the 2013/14 annual report.
Board and Committee meeting attendance
The following table shows the number of years each director has served on the Board as at the financial year end, and their
attendance at the scheduled Board and Committee meetings which they were eligible to attend:
Tenure
in years Board
Audit
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Daniel Bernard 6 9/9 – 4/4 3/4
(3)
Andrew Bonfield 3 8/9 4/4 3/4 3/4
(3)
Pascal Cagni 2 8/9 – – 4/4
Clare Chapman 2 9/9 – 4/4 4/4
Ian Cheshire 12 9/9 – – –
Anders Dahlvig 3 8/9 3/4 – 3/4
(3)
Janis Kong 6 9/9 4/4 4/4 3/4
(3)
Kevin O’Byrne 4 9/9 – – –
Mark Seligman 1 9/9 4/4 – 4/4
Euan Sutherland
(1),(2)
<1 3/3 – – –
Philippe Tible
(1)
<1 3/3 – – –
Karen Witts
(1)
<1 3/3 – – –
(1) Euan Sutherland, Philippe Tible and Karen Witts were appointed to the Board with effect from 1 October 2012.
(2) Euan Sutherland retired from the Board following the meeting on 31 January 2013.
(3) Directors did not attend meetings where their reappointment was considered.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
38
38
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Induction, information and professional development
All new directors appointed to the Board receive an induction
pack as part of their comprehensive induction programme
tailored to their experience, background and particular areas
of focus. The induction programme is designed to develop
directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Group’s
operations and culture.
The induction programme includes:
• individual one-to-one meetings with the Chairman, the Group
Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director and other directors;
• site visits to the Group’s stores and those of its competitors;
• meetings with management of the Group’s Operating
Companies and other senior management; and
• if required, external training courses at the Group’s expense.
In accordance with best practice, the Chairman considers and
addresses the development needs of the Board as a whole, if
any, and ensures that each director updates their individual
skills, knowledge and expertise.
Following the appointment of three new executive directors
during the year, the Company Secretary arranged for the Group’s
corporate lawyers to provide a training session on their duties and
responsibilities as directors of a UK listed company. Amongst other
topics, the training covered Listing Rules compliance and the
control and release of inside information, and provided case
studies and practical situations for the directors to consider.
Subsequent training in specific aspects of the Group’s
businesses is provided to directors, when requested, or regularly
as part of site visits. Directors are briefed on issues at Board and
Committee meetings and have full and timely access to relevant
information ahead of each meeting.
The Board also receives reports on circumstances where issues
and concerns have been raised by the Company’s institutional
shareholders. This process allows directors to develop
necessary understanding of the views of these shareholders
and also enables the Board to judge whether investors have a
sufficient understanding of the Group’s objectives.
In addition to planned development and briefings, directors are
expected to take responsibility for identifying their own individual
needs and to take necessary steps to ensure that they are
adequately informed about the Group and their responsibilities
as a director. The Board is confident that all its members have
the requisite knowledge, ability and experience to perform the
functions required of a director of a listed company. There
is also an agreed procedure whereby directors may take
independent professional advice at the Group’s expense in
the furtherance of their duties.
Conflicts of interest
Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 to
avoid a situation where he or she may have a direct or indirect
interest that conflicts with the interests of the Company. The
Company has robust procedures in place to identify, authorise
and manage such conflicts of interest, and these procedures
have operated effectively during the year.
A register of directors’ situational and transactional conflicts is
maintained by the Company Secretary and reviewed by the
Board on a regular basis. The Board confirmed during the year
that there were no situations of which they were aware which
would, or potentially could, give rise to conflicts with the
interests of the Company, other than those that might arise from
directors’ other appointments, which are set out in the directors’
biographies on pages 28 to 29.
Committees
The Board has delegated authority to its princip committees
to carry out certain tasks as defined in each committee’s
respective terms of reference. The written terms of reference
in respect of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination
Committees are available on the Company’s website. The
Board is satisfied that the terms of reference for each of these
committees satisfy the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. The terms of reference of the princip
committees are reviewed on an on-going basis.
The minutes of committee meetings are made available to all
directors on a timely basis. In addition, at each Board meeting,
the chairmen of each of the principal committees provide the
Board with a brief synopsis of the work carried out by the
committee, if any, between Board meetings.
In addition to the princip committees, the Board is supported
by the work of the Group Executive Committee and its
subcommittees. Together these committees form a fundamental
element of the Company’s corporate governance framework,
although they are not formally appointed committees of the
Board. The Group’s governance structure is set out below. A
brief explanation of the work of the Group Executive Committee
and the other management committees is set out below:
al
al
al
39
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Group Executive Committee
The responsibilities, structure and composition of the Group
Executive Committee were reviewed and amended during the
year. The Committee consists of the executive directors, the
CEO, Productivity and Development, and the CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer. The Committee meets formally ten times
a year under the chairmanship of the Group Chief Executive.
The members’ details are set out on page 30.
The Committee’s primary focus is the strategic direction of the
Group. In addition, the Committee monitors top talent within the
business and reviews key items requiring formal Board approval
including dividend planning, key projects and strategic
capex decisions.
In accordance with its formal terms of reference, the Group
Executive Committee is also responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board on:
• strategic and business plans of individual businesses;
• the Group’s capital structure and funding;
• strategic capital expenditure proposals, major acquisitions
or disposals of businesses;
• the Group’s key risks;
• management development and senior executive succession
plans; and
• the Group’s corporate responsibility programme.
During the year, the Committee met seven times and, in
addition to its standing agenda, reviewed:
• the Group’s branding strategies and Group procurement and
sourcing arrangements;
• UK pension reform and the curtailment of the Group’s final
salary pension scheme and enhancement of the defined
contribution scheme;
• operating budgets and monthly trading performance;
• the Group’s IT strategy and planning;
• the Group’s Irish business and the examinership process;
• strategy for embedding sustainability into Group
behaviours; and
• HR proposals for management development and
succession planning.
Group Operating Board
The Group Operating Board was established following a review
of the work of the Group Executive Committee in March 2013,
and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Group’s businesses. In addition, the Group Operating Board
reviews the overall financial performance of the Group against
its strategic plans and budget. The Group Operating Board will
also review people-related activities as part of its structured
agenda, and will conduct deep-dive reviews of key areas
affecting the business. The Group Operating Board, which
meets monthly, comprises all the members of the Group
Executive Committee, the CEOs of B&Q UK & Ireland,
Castorama France and Brico Dépôt brands, the Group
Human Resources Director, and the Finance Director
of the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands.
Kingfisher Capex Committee
The Capex Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving all capital expenditure projects relating to property
and non-property proposals in excess of an agreed threshold,
which is reviewed periodically. The decisions of the Committee
are reported to the Board following each meeting, and the
Committee will make recommendations to the Board regarding
all projects exceeding its agreed approval threshold. The
Committee comprises the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, Group Property Director, CEO, Group
Productivity and Development, the Group General Counsel,
and the Head of Property Finance.
Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury Committee
The primary purpose of the Committee is to monitor compliance
of policies and control issues relating to Group Finance, and to
review key proposals from Group Finance, Treasury, Tax and
Secretariat functions, and where appropriate recommend
certain initiatives for approval to the Board. The Committee
comprises the Group Finance Director, Group Finance and
Planning Director, Group Treasurer, Group Tax Director, Head
of Group Pensions, Head of Corporate Development, Group
General Counsel, Company Secretary and Group Audit and
Risk Director.
Details of each of the Board’s princip committees, including
membership, are set out in the following reports.
al
Group Executive
Committee
King?sher Capex
Committee
Financial Initiatives,
Tax & Treasury
Committee
Group Operating
Board
Audit
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Organisation and Governance Structure
Board
39
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
38
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Induction, information and professional development
All new directors appointed to the Board receive an induction
pack as part of their comprehensive induction programme
tailored to their experience, background and particular areas
of focus. The induction programme is designed to develop
directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Group’s
operations and culture.
The induction programme includes:
• individual one-to-one meetings with the Chairman, the Group
Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director and other directors;
• site visits to the Group’s stores and those of its competitors;
• meetings with management of the Group’s Operating
Companies and other senior management; and
• if required, external training courses at the Group’s expense.
In accordance with best practice, the Chairman considers and
addresses the development needs of the Board as a whole, if
any, and ensures that each director updates their individual
skills, knowledge and expertise.
Following the appointment of three new executive directors
during the year, the Company Secretary arranged for the Group’s
corporate lawyers to provide a training session on their duties and
responsibilities as directors of a UK listed company. Amongst other
topics, the training covered Listing Rules compliance and the
control and release of inside information, and provided case
studies and practical situations for the directors to consider.
Subsequent training in specific aspects of the Group’s
businesses is provided to directors, when requested, or regularly
as part of site visits. Directors are briefed on issues at Board and
Committee meetings and have full and timely access to relevant
information ahead of each meeting.
The Board also receives reports on circumstances where issues
and concerns have been raised by the Company’s institutional
shareholders. This process allows directors to develop
necessary understanding of the views of these shareholders
and also enables the Board to judge whether investors have a
sufficient understanding of the Group’s objectives.
In addition to planned development and briefings, directors are
expected to take responsibility for identifying their own individual
needs and to take necessary steps to ensure that they are
adequately informed about the Group and their responsibilities
as a director. The Board is confident that all its members have
the requisite knowledge, ability and experience to perform the
functions required of a director of a listed company. There
is also an agreed procedure whereby directors may take
independent professional advice at the Group’s expense in
the furtherance of their duties.
Conflicts of interest
Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 to
avoid a situation where he or she may have a direct or indirect
interest that conflicts with the interests of the Company. The
Company has robust procedures in place to identify, authorise
and manage such conflicts of interest, and these procedures
have operated effectively during the year.
A register of directors’ situational and transactional conflicts is
maintained by the Company Secretary and reviewed by the
Board on a regular basis. The Board confirmed during the year
that there were no situations of which they were aware which
would, or potentially could, give rise to conflicts with the
interests of the Company, other than those that might arise from
directors’ other appointments, which are set out in the directors’
biographies on pages 28 to 29.
Committees
The Board has delegated authority to its princip committees
to carry out certain tasks as defined in each committee’s
respective terms of reference. The written terms of reference
in respect of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination
Committees are available on the Company’s website. The
Board is satisfied that the terms of reference for each of these
committees satisfy the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. The terms of reference of the princip
committees are reviewed on an on-going basis.
The minutes of committee meetings are made available to all
directors on a timely basis. In addition, at each Board meeting,
the chairmen of each of the principal committees provide the
Board with a brief synopsis of the work carried out by the
committee, if any, between Board meetings.
In addition to the princip committees, the Board is supported
by the work of the Group Executive Committee and its
subcommittees. Together these committees form a fundamental
element of the Company’s corporate governance framework,
although they are not formally appointed committees of the
Board. The Group’s governance structure is set out below. A
brief explanation of the work of the Group Executive Committee
and the other management committees is set out below:
al
al
al
39
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Group Executive Committee
The responsibilities, structure and composition of the Group
Executive Committee were reviewed and amended during the
year. The Committee consists of the executive directors, the
CEO, Productivity and Development, and the CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer. The Committee meets formally ten times
a year under the chairmanship of the Group Chief Executive.
The members’ details are set out on page 30.
The Committee’s primary focus is the strategic direction of the
Group. In addition, the Committee monitors top talent within the
business and reviews key items requiring formal Board approval
including dividend planning, key projects and strategic
capex decisions.
In accordance with its formal terms of reference, the Group
Executive Committee is also responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board on:
• strategic and business plans of individual businesses;
• the Group’s capital structure and funding;
• strategic capital expenditure proposals, major acquisitions
or disposals of businesses;
• the Group’s key risks;
• management development and senior executive succession
plans; and
• the Group’s corporate responsibility programme.
During the year, the Committee met seven times and, in
addition to its standing agenda, reviewed:
• the Group’s branding strategies and Group procurement and
sourcing arrangements;
• UK pension reform and the curtailment of the Group’s final
salary pension scheme and enhancement of the defined
contribution scheme;
• operating budgets and monthly trading performance;
• the Group’s IT strategy and planning;
• the Group’s Irish business and the examinership process;
• strategy for embedding sustainability into Group
behaviours; and
• HR proposals for management development and
succession planning.
Group Operating Board
The Group Operating Board was established following a review
of the work of the Group Executive Committee in March 2013,
and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Group’s businesses. In addition, the Group Operating Board
reviews the overall financial performance of the Group against
its strategic plans and budget. The Group Operating Board will
also review people-related activities as part of its structured
agenda, and will conduct deep-dive reviews of key areas
affecting the business. The Group Operating Board, which
meets monthly, comprises all the members of the Group
Executive Committee, the CEOs of B&Q UK & Ireland,
Castorama France and Brico Dépôt brands, the Group
Human Resources Director, and the Finance Director
of the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands.
Kingfisher Capex Committee
The Capex Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving all capital expenditure projects relating to property
and non-property proposals in excess of an agreed threshold,
which is reviewed periodically. The decisions of the Committee
are reported to the Board following each meeting, and the
Committee will make recommendations to the Board regarding
all projects exceeding its agreed approval threshold. The
Committee comprises the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, Group Property Director, CEO, Group
Productivity and Development, the Group General Counsel,
and the Head of Property Finance.
Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury Committee
The primary purpose of the Committee is to monitor compliance
of policies and control issues relating to Group Finance, and to
review key proposals from Group Finance, Treasury, Tax and
Secretariat functions, and where appropriate recommend
certain initiatives for approval to the Board. The Committee
comprises the Group Finance Director, Group Finance and
Planning Director, Group Treasurer, Group Tax Director, Head
of Group Pensions, Head of Corporate Development, Group
General Counsel, Company Secretary and Group Audit and
Risk Director.
Details of each of the Board’s princip committees, including
membership, are set out in the following reports.
al
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
40
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the report of the Audit Committee for
2012/13. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board from
amongst its non-executive directors, and its princip duties are
to provide effective oversight and governance of the internal
control and risk management processes of the Company, to
review the financial statements and related accounting policies,
review the effectiveness of the internal and external audit
functions and provide updates and recommendations to
the Board.
During the year, the Committee continued the analysis of
the Company’s risks and associated mitigating controls and
focused on compliance, financial governance and internal audit
functions. It maintained its good working relationship with the
Group Audit and Risk Management Director, the Group Finance
and Planning Director, the Company Secretary and Group’s
external auditor, Deloitte LLP. The Committee maintained,
reviewed and where necessary amended its standing agenda,
which is linked to the Group’s financial calendars.
In order to improve the understanding of their operations,
during the year the Committee received in-depth presentations
from management of the Group’s Operating Companies in
the UK, France, Spain, Russia and Turkey, including the
key strategic risks impacting each business. The Committee
considered and reviewed the Group’s adequate procedures
in relation to bribery and corruption, the provision of a
whistleblowing service and approved accounting judgements
in relation to the curtailment of the Kingfisher final salary
pension scheme.
A fuller description of the operations of the Committee is set
out below. I will be available at the Annual General Meeting to
answer any questions about the work of the Committee.
For and on behalf of the Committee
Andrew Bonfield
Chairman of the Audit Committee
25 March 2013
Committee composition
The Audit Committee comprises four non-executive directors:
Andrew Bonfield (Chairman)
Anders Dahlvig
Janis Kong
Mark Seligman
All Committee members are considered independent in
accordance with provision B.1.1 of the UK Corporate
Governance Code.
Audit Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Andrew Bonfield (Chairman) 11/02/2010 4 of 4
Anders Dahlvig 16/12/2009 3 of 4
Janis Kong 11/02/2011 4 of 4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 4 of 4
Duties
In accordance with its terms of reference, the Audit Committee
is required, amongst other things, to:
monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Group;
review, understand and evaluate the Group’s internal financial
risk, and other internal controls and their associated systems;
monitor and review the effectiveness of the Group’s internal
audit function on an annual basis;
oversee the relationship with the external auditor,
making recommendations to the Board in relation to their
appointment, remuneration and terms of engagement;
agree the scope of the auditor’s annual audit programme
and review the output; and
monitor and review the external auditor’s independence,
objectivity and effectiveness and to approve the policy
on the engagement of the external auditor to supply
non-audit services.
The Committee’s terms of reference were reviewed during the
year and are considered fit for purpose and reflect best practice.
No amendments were recommended to the Board following the
latest review. The terms of reference are available on the
Company’s website.
Governance
In accordance with the requirements of provision C.3.1 of the
UK Corporate Governance Code, Andrew Bonfield is designated
as the Committee member with recent and relevant financial
experience. All other members of the Audit Committee are
deemed to have the necessary ability and experience to
understand financial statements. The attendance by members
at Committee meetings is set out above.
All members of the Committee receive appropriate induction,
in addition to the induction which all new directors receive.
The induction programme includes an overview of the business,
its financial dynamics and risks. New Committee members
also obtain access to the Group’s operations and staff,
and all members of the Committee undertake on-going
training as required.
The Committee is required, under its terms of reference, to
meet at least three times a year. During the year, the Committee
met four times. The Committee has a standing agenda linked to
events in the Group’s financial calendar for consideration at
each meeting, and within the annual audit cycle, to ensure that
its work is in line with the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. At the invitation of the Committee, the
Chairman of the Board and the Group Chief Executive attended
all meetings, as did the Group Finance Director, Group Audit
and Risk Management Director, Group Finance and Planning
Director and the external auditor. Private meetings were
also held with the external and internal auditors at which
management were not present.
al
Audit Committee Report
41
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Detailed below is the key work undertaken by the Committee
during the year under review and up to the date of this
Annual Report.
Activities of the Audit Committee during the year
Governance processes
The Committee conducted an externally facilitated questionnaire
based review of its effectiveness during the year. The Committee
considered the results of the review at its meeting in January
2013, and concluded that it continued to operate effectively
and provide robust challenge and support to the Board. It was
agreed by the Committee that no specific actions were required.
Internal controls and risk
The Committee received and considered reports during the
year from the Group’s external auditor, Deloitte LLP, and the
Group’s internal audit function on the work they had undertaken
in reviewing and auditing the Group, in order to assess the
quality and effectiveness of the internal control system.
The Committee considered reports on the output from the
Group-wide process used to identify, evaluate and mitigate
risks and reviewed the annual report on the Group’s systems of
internal control and their effectiveness, and reported the results
of the review to the Board. Further information on the Group’s
risk management and internal control procedures can be found
on page 42.
As part of the Committee’s continuing programme to increase
its awareness of the Group’s operations and to understand the
implementation of Operating Company control processes, the
Committee met with and received presentations from the senior
management of the operating companies in the UK, France,
Spain, Russia and Turkey. In addition, the Committee continued
to monitor the progress on the standardisation and improvement
of the Group’s internal control processes, in a number of
key areas.
The Group operates a whistleblowing helpline which allows
employees within the Group to make disclosures about
suspected financial and operational improprieties. The
“SpeakUp” service was relaunched in 2012 and expanded
during the year to be available to the Group’s suppliers. The
Audit Committee reviewed the Group’s overall whistleblowing
arrangements to ensure they remained effective, at its meeting
in January 2013. The Committee reviewed the output from the
service and considered the number and type of incidents
reported, and was satisfied that the Group continued to
maintain adequate mechanisms for recording disclosures.
Financial reporting
The Committee reviewed the annual and interim financial
statements during the year. As part of this review, the
Committee considered significant accounting policies, financial
reporting issues and judgements (including those disclosed in
note 3 to the financial statements), together with the reports
received from the external auditor on their findings, including
any control observations relevant to their audit work. The impact
on the Group’s financial statements of significant corporate
governance and accounting standards applicable during the
year, were considered and reviewed by the Committee.
Group Internal Audit
The Committee considered and reviewed updates from the
internal audit programme at each of its meetings during the
year. Reports from the internal audit function to the Committee
included updates on the Group’s risk management systems,
findings from reviews, and reviews of the remit, organisation,
annual plan and resources of the internal audit function. During
the year, the Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the
internal audit function. The review was conducted using an
internal questionnaire with input from the function’s key
stakeholders within the Group, in addition to the Committee.
No significant issues were highlighted by the review.
External Audit
Deloitte LLP were appointed as the external auditor to the
Group in 2009 following a formal tender process.
During the year, the Committee agreed the approach and scope
of the audit work to be undertaken by the external auditor and
undertook an assessment of their qualification, expertise and
resources, independence and the effectiveness of the external
audit process. The Committee also reviewed and agreed the
terms of engagement, the fees, and areas of responsibility and
the work to be undertaken by the external auditor, and agreed
the fees payable in respect of the 2012/13 audit work. Details
of the amounts paid to the external auditor for their audit
services are given in note 7 to the accounts on page 75.
Each of the Group’s businesses is consulted on the
effectiveness and independence of the external auditor
annually. In addition, the external auditor provides the Committee
with a schedule of each matter on which there was an initial
difference between them and management in relation to the
accounting treatment, and with the final decisions on these
issues. The Committee has reviewed and is satisfied with the
effectiveness and independence of the external auditor.
In addition to their statutory duties, the services of Deloitte LLP
are also engaged where, as a result of their position as external
auditor, they either must, or are best placed to, perform
the work in question. This is primarily work in relation to
matters such as shareholder circulars, Group borrowings,
tax advice, regulatory filings and certain business acquisitions
and disposals. Other work is awarded on the basis of
competitive tendering.
The Committee reviewed and approved the scope of non-audit
services provided by the external auditor to ensure that there
was no impairment of independence and objectivity, and
subsequently monitored the non-audit work performed to
ensure it was within policy guidelines.
The Group has a policy on the use of its external auditor for
non-audit work and this is regularly reviewed. The external
auditor is precluded from engaging in non-audit services that
would compromise their independence or violate any laws or
regulations affecting their appointment as external auditor.
The approval of the Chairman of the Committee is required
prior to awarding contracts for non-audit services to the
external auditor, where in excess of specified amounts.
The external auditor reports to the Committee annually on
their independence from the Company. Periodic rotation
of key audit partners is also required.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
42
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
The Group’s policy on the use of the external auditor for
non-audit work can be found on the Company’s website.
The Committee has recommended to the Board that Deloitte
LLP be proposed for re-appointment by shareholders as the
Company’s external auditor at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting. As a result of its work during the year, the Committee
has concluded that it acted in accordance with its terms of
reference and has ensured the independence and objectivity
of the external auditor.
During the year, Deloitte LLP charged the Group £1.6m
(2011/12: £1.4m) for audit and audit-related services and a
further £0.4m (2011/12: £0.5m) for non-audit services during
the year.
Accountability, Risk Management and Internal Control
Internal control
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of
internal control, which is designed to safeguard the assets of the
Group and ensure the reliability of the financial information for
both internal use and external publication, and to comply with
the Turnbull guidance and the UK Corporate Governance Code.
The Board confirms that it has reviewed the effectiveness of
the internal control system, including financial, operational and
compliance controls and risk management in accordance
with the UK Corporate Governance Code, for the period from
29 January 2012 to the date of approval of this Annual Report.
If significant losses were to be incurred during the year as a
result of a failure of controls, a detailed report would be provided
to the Audit Committee and the Board. The Board confirms that
no significant weaknesses were identified in relation to the
review carried out during the year and therefore no remedial
action was required.
The Board has approved a set of policies, procedures and
frameworks for effective internal control. The Group has
procedures for the delegation of authorities for significant
matters to ensure approval is sought at the appropriate level.
These procedures are subject to regular review and provide an
on-going process for identifying, evaluating and managing the
significant risks faced by the Group. Such a system is designed
to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve
business objectives and can provide only reasonable and not
absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The responsibility for designing, operating and monitoring the
system and the maintenance of effective control is delegated
to the management of each Operating Company. The Group’s
enterprise-wide risk management and reporting process helps
Group management to identify, assess, prioritise and mitigate
risk. Management at each Operating Company has
responsibility for the identification and evaluation of the
significant risks applicable to their business and any mitigating
actions to be taken. The Group Executive Committee reviews,
identifies and evaluates the risks that are significant at a Group
level, as well as the mitigating actions against those risks. These
are then considered by the Board. The types of risks identified
included both strategic and material operational risks and are
detailed on pages 25 to 27 of the report.
Management is required to apply judgement in evaluating the
risks facing the Group in achieving its objectives, in determining
the risks that are considered acceptable to bear, in assessing
the likelihood of those risks materialising, in identifying the
Group’s ability to reduce the incidence and impact on the
business of risks that do materialise, and in ensuring the
costs of operating particular controls are proportionate to
the benefit provided.
Monitoring
There are clear processes for controlling and monitoring the
system of internal control and reporting any significant control
failings or weaknesses together with details of corrective action.
These include:
an annual planning process and regular financial reporting,
comparing results with plan and the previous year on a
monthly and cumulative basis;
written reports from the Group Chief Executive and
Group Finance Director submitted at each Board meeting;
Operating Company management report formally to the Audit
Committee on a regular basis on the control environment in
their business and actions taken to maintain or improve the
environment as appropriate; and
reports and presentations to the Board on certain areas
of specialist risk. These include treasury, insurance, tax
and pensions.
A formal quarterly certification is provided by the CEO and
finance director of each Operating Company stating that
appropriate internal controls were in operation and confirming
compliance with Group policies and procedures. Any
weaknesses are highlighted and the results are reviewed by
Operating Company management, the Group Audit and Risk
Management Director, the Group Finance and Planning
Director, the Audit Committee and the Board. The internal
audit function monitors and selectively checks the results of
this exercise, ensuring that representations made are consistent
with the results of its work during the year.
The internal audit function follows a planned programme of
reviews that are aligned to the Group’s risks. The function:
works with the Operating Companies to develop, improve and
embed risk management tools and processes into their
business operations;
reports directly to the Audit Committee and has the authority
to review any relevant part of the Group;
oversees the operation of the individual operating businesses’
audit committees; and
provides the Audit Committee and the Board with objective
assurance on the control environment across the Group.
Risk appetite
During the year, the Board also considered the nature and level
of risk that it was prepared to accept in order to deliver business
strategies, and has reviewed and approved the Group’s internal
statement of risk appetite. This describes both the current
and desired levels of acceptable risk, supported by high level
qualitative risk statements, ensuring that risks are proactively
managed to the level desired by the Board.
43
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Committee composition
The Committee comprises the Chairman and all the non-
executive directors and meets periodically as required. External
advisors may be invited to attend meetings when particular
issues are to be considered. During the year the Committee met
four times. The members of the Nomination Committee are:
Daniel Bernard (Chairman)
Andrew Bonfield
Pascal Cagni
Clare Chapman
Anders Dahlvig
Janis Kong
Mark Seligman
Nomination Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Daniel Bernard (Chairman) 24/05/2006 3 of 4
Andrew Bonfield 11/02/2010 3 of 4
Pascal Cagni 17/11/2010 4 of 4
Clare Chapman 02/12/2010 4 of 4
Anders Dahlvig 19/12/2009 3 of 4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 3 of 4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 4 of 4
Directors did not attend meetings where their reappointment was considered.
Duties
The primary purpose of the Nomination Committee is to lead, on
behalf of the Board, the process for Board appointments and to
make recommendations for maintaining an appropriate balance
of diversity and skills on the Board. In accordance with its terms
of reference, the Nomination Committee is required to:
review the structure, size and composition of the Board
and make recommendations to the Board, as appropriate;
identify the balance of skills, knowledge, diversity and
experience on the Board and nominate candidates to fill
Board vacancies;
review the time commitment required from the
non-executive directors;
consider succession planning, taking into account the
challenges and opportunities facing the Group and the
future skills and expertise needed on the Board; and
review the leadership needs of the organisation, both
executive and non-executive, with a view to ensuring the
continued ability of the organisation to compete effectively
in the marketplace.
The Committee’s terms of reference are reviewed
regularly, approved by the Board, and are available on
the Company’s website.
Activities during the year
During the year, the Committee conducted a rigorous search
and selection process, carried out with the assistance of an
independent executive search company, Blackwood, to identify
suitable candidates for the role of Group Finance Director.
Candidates with a background in retail or fast moving consumer
goods were considered preferable, and the Nomination
Committee considered a shortlist of internal and external
candidates before proposing the appointment of Karen Witts
as Group Finance Director. In making its appointment
recommendations to the Board, the Nomination Committee
reviewed the overall balance of skills, knowledge, experience
and diversity on the Board against current and future
requirements of the Company. Having satisfied itself that both
Euan Sutherland and Philippe Tible possessed the necessary
balance of skills, knowledge and experience to support the
relevant roles and responsibilities of a director of a UK listed
company, the Committee recommended and supported their
appointment to the Kingfisher plc Board as executive directors.
At its meeting in June 2012, the Committee considered the
reappointment of Daniel Bernard for a further three-year period
following the expiry of his second three-year term as a director.
The Committee agreed that he continued to provide strong and
effective leadership to the Board and recommended he be
reappointed for a further three-year term.
The reappointment of Andrew Bonfield, Anders Dahlvig and
Janis Kong, following the expiry of their three-year terms of
appointment as directors, was also considered by the
Committee at its meeting in November 2012. The Committee
concluded that all directors continued to provide the necessary
balance of skills and experience to the Board including
considerable financial and retail experience, and in-depth
knowledge of the workings of the Group. The Committee
therefore recommended to the Board that each be reappointed
as a director of the Company for an additional three-year term.
The Committee received and reviewed a talent and HR
update from the Group HR Director, which outlined succession
planning and talent pipeline considerations in support of
the Group’s Creating the Leader strategy.
Following the changes to the composition of the Board
during the year, the Committee firmly believes that the current
composition represents a strong, well balanced and diverse
Board. The Board membership is made up of specialists in
retail, technology, finance and human resources, and possesses
considerable knowledge, experience and skills to meet the
current and future requirements of the Group. The Chairman
will be available at the Annual General Meeting to answer any
questions about the work of the Committee.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman of the Nomination Committee
25 March 2013
Nomination
Committee Report
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
44
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Full details of the Remuneration Committee composition,
role, authority and activities during the year are set out in the
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. The report
will be subject to an advisory vote by shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting on 13 June 2013.
The Chairman of the Committee will be available at the Annual
General Meeting to answer any questions about the work of
the Committee.
Remuneration Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Clare Chapman (Chairman) 16/02/2011 4 of 4
Daniel Bernard 03/06/2009 4 of 4
Andrew Bonfield 17/06/2010 3 of 4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 4 of 4
Relationship with shareholders
Relations with shareholders
The Company is committed to communicating its strategy
and activities clearly to its shareholders and, to that end,
maintains an active dialogue with investors through a planned
programme of investor relations activities. The investor relations
programme includes:
formal presentations of full-year and interim results;
conference calls to discuss quarterly trading statements;
regular meetings between institutional investors and senior
management to ensure that the investor community receives
a balanced and complete view of the Group’s performance
and the issues faced by the Group;
hosting investors’ and analysts’ sessions at which
senior management from relevant Operating Companies
deliver presentations which provide an overview of their
individual businesses;
responding to enquiries from shareholders through the
Company’s investor relations team;
regular meetings with institutional investors and analysts
by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director
to discuss business performance; and
a section dedicated to shareholders on the Company’s website.
The Chairman, the Senior Independent Director and the
chairmen of the Board’s Committees are available to meet
major investors on request. The Senior Independent Director
has a specific responsibility to be available to shareholders
who have concerns, and for whom contact with the Chairman,
Group Chief Executive or Group Finance Director has
either failed to resolve their concerns, or for whom such
contact is inappropriate.
As part of his formal induction as Senior Independent Director,
Mark Seligman met a number of the Group’s significant
shareholders to obtain a better understanding of their views.
Annual General Meeting
The principal means of communication with private investors is
by electronic communications and through the Annual General
Meeting, which is attended by all the Company’s directors,
and allows all shareholders present the opportunity to question
the Chairman and the directors, as well as the chairmen of
the Board’s Committees. After the Annual General Meeting,
shareholders have the opportunity to meet informally
with directors.
A summary business presentation is given at the Annual
General Meeting before the Chairman deals with the formal
business of the meeting. At the Annual General Meeting in
June 2013, the Chairman will use his discretion to call for
a poll on all resolutions. The results of the poll in relation to
all resolutions will be disclosed to those in attendance at the
meeting, published on the Company’s website and announced
to the London Stock Exchange shortly after the conclusion of the
Annual General Meeting.
Remuneration
Committee Report
45
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Dear Shareholder
This is my first full year as Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee, and I am very pleased to present the Company’s
2012/13 Directors’ Remuneration Report on behalf of the Board.
Better Homes, Better Lives
Kingfisher’s purpose is to make it easier for customers to
have better, more sustainable homes. Our short hand for this is
“Better Homes, Better Lives”. Success in achieving this means
delivering value to our shareholders, behaving responsibly in the
communities in which the Group operates, making sustainable
choices, and creating fulfilling and secure roles for our
employees. The Remuneration Committee is committed to
structuring remuneration for executives that supports and
drives this purpose.
Ensuring value is a theme which is central to the working of the
Remuneration Committee, and although this report focuses on
the executive directors, we also look more broadly to ensure
alignment and fairness between contribution and reward. This
means that, by improving the business, all can benefit. This is
also true for employees and, at Kingfisher, performance-linked
incentives and share-based plans are cascaded throughout the
organisation from the leadership team to store-based employees.
During 2012/13 our reported results were affected by adverse
currency movements, the particularly poor summer weather in
Northern Europe, which dampened customer demand during our
peak season, and the economic uncertainty our customers are
facing across Europe. It was therefore no surprise that 2012 was
difficult for retailers in general. As a consequence, annual bonus
payments made to the executive directors for the year will be
between 58% and 80% of salary and in the region of 29% and
40% of the maximum opportunity. Performance in the last four
years has been extremely strong and reward reflects this. The
Sharesave awards, which vested in 2012/13, are a good example
of this with over 2,000 employees benefiting from a total
estimated gain of around £34 million, giving an average profit per
person of around £1,600. The three-year performance period of
awards granted in 2010 under the Performance Share Plan
(‘PSP’) ended on 5 May 2013. In respect of the awards granted
to executive directors, vesting levels were between 50% and
100% and were linked to performance over the past three years.
The Committee set stretching long-term targets for awards
granted under the Performance Share Plan (the ‘PSP’) in 2011
as part of the Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy.
This one-off award has created a strong focus on a single
performance period, which aligns to the next phase of the Group’s
strategy. Further details about how this strategy is being reflected
in our remuneration structure are provided later in this report.
2013 Remuneration review
During the year under review, there have been no major
changes to the Group’s remuneration policy. In order to ensure a
continued strong alignment between executive directors’ and
shareholders’ interests, the Committee will conduct a full review of
the Company’s executive remuneration arrangements during
2013. The key focus of this review will be to determine what form
of long-term incentive arrangements should replace the current
Performance Share Plan when the next awards are due to be
made in 2014. The Committee will ensure that it has due regard
to developments in market and best practice, and to appropriately
link such awards to the Group’s strategic objectives. It is also
committed to consulting with its major shareholders and key
representative bodies as part of this process. No significant
changes to remuneration policy are planned for 2013/14.
Remuneration reporting
During the year under review, the Department for Business,
Innovation & Skills (‘BIS’) has continued to develop its proposals
to improve the transparency of remuneration reporting, and to
give shareholders greater influence over future remuneration
policy. The Company believes that linking pay to Group
performance, and dialogue with shareholders are fundamental
to the remit of the Remuneration Committee. Whilst the
final regulations on remuneration reporting have yet to be
determined, we believe that the Company already addresses
many of the proposals, and where new disclosure would be
required, have decided to incorporate many of these within
this year’s report ahead of the requirement to do so.
I will be available at the AGM in June to answer any questions
about the work of the Committee.
At our 2012 AGM, 98% of shareholders voted in favour of our
Directors’ Remuneration Report, and I very much hope you will
support the 2012/13 Directors’ Remuneration Report at our
forthcoming meeting.
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
25 March 2013
“
WE STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT LINKING PAY TO GROUP
PERFORMANCE, AND DIALOGUE WITH SHAREHOLDERS
ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO THE REMIT OF THE
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE.
”
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
For a PDF of the Directors’ Remuneration Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
46
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
This report has been prepared on behalf of the Board by the
Remuneration Committee (the ‘Committee’), and has been
prepared in accordance with the Large and Medium-sized
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations
2008 (the ‘Regulations’) issued under the Companies Act
2006 (the ‘Act’), and describes how the Board has applied the
principles relating to directors’ remuneration set out in the UK
Corporate Governance Code, and complied with the Financial
Services Authority Listing Rules. Although not yet mandatory,
the report also seeks to adopt the key aspects of the reporting
obligations proposed by BIS, whilst recognising that the final
requirements may not be exactly as we have assumed based on
the latest information available to us. Included in this year’s
report are, based on our understanding of the likely final
position, a single figure table detailing the total remuneration
for the executive directors and a scenario chart detailing future
potential remuneration of executive directors at below threshold,
target, and maximum levels of performance. We have also
provided a version of the remuneration policy table as
prescribed by BIS. The Remuneration Report for 2013/14
will be fully compliant with the final BIS regulations, which will
likely require the report to be split into separate policy and
implementation reports.
The Remuneration Committee
Role and responsibilities
The Committee’s primary purpose is to make recommendations
to the Board on the Group’s framework or broad policy
for executive remuneration and its costs. The Board has
delegated responsibility to the Committee for determining the
remuneration, benefits and contractual arrangements of the
Chairman, executive directors, certain senior executives, and
the Company Secretary, and for overseeing the Group’s share-
based incentive schemes and bonus schemes. The
remuneration of non-executive directors is determined
by the Chairman and executive members of the Board.
The Committee recommends and monitors the structure and
levels of remuneration of senior managers throughout the
Group. It also ensures that contractual terms on termination,
and any payments made are fair to the individual and the
Group, ensuring that failure is not rewarded, and that the
departing manager’s duty to mitigate is fully recognised.
The Committee is committed to the principles of accountability
and transparency, and to ensuring remuneration arrangements
demonstrate a clear link between reward and performance.
Remuneration is structured to promote sustainable growth and
to avoid excessive and inappropriate risks. Operating under
delegated authority from, and reporting to the Board, its
activities are governed by terms of reference which can be
found on the Company’s website. The Committee’s terms of
reference are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that they
remain fit for purpose, and continue to be in line with market
best practice.
Membership
The Committee comprised the following independent non-
executive directors during the financial year to 2 February 2013.
Chairman
Clare Chapman
Committee members
Daniel Bernard
Andrew Bonfield
Janis Kong
Meetings
The Committee is required by its terms of reference to meet at
least twice a year, and maintains a rolling standing schedule of
agenda items for the year. An overview of key standing agenda
items for the Committee’s annual meetings is set out below.
During the year, the Committee met four times. Committee
meetings were attended by the Group Chief Executive, who
provided advice that materially assisted the Committee. In
addition, the Group Human Resources Director and the Head
of Group Reward attended Committee meetings, and provided
material assistance and advice on remuneration policy. The
Group Finance Director attended by invitation on matters
relating to performance measures. The Company Secretary
acted as Secretary to the Committee. No member of the
Committee had a personal financial interest (other than as a
shareholder), conflict of interest arising from cross-directorships,
or day-to-day involvement in running the business, and no
person took part in any discussion about his or her own
remuneration. Details of individual attendance at Committee
meetings are provided within the Corporate Governance
Report on page 44.
Following a robust evaluation of the Committee during the
year, it was agreed that the Committee continued to operate
effectively. Full details of the evaluation process are set out
within the Corporate Governance Report on page 37.
Remuneration Committee calendar for 2012/13
Month Activities
February 2012
Vesting of PSP awards
Consideration of bonus design
Annual bonus awards – provisional results
March 2012
LTIP performance measures outcome
Approval of bonus targets
Bonus outturn for the year
Review of 2011/12 Remuneration Report
September 2012
Remuneration strategy
Ratification of KIS and PSP awards made earlier
in the year
Review of standing agenda schedule
Approval of Sharesave invitation
January 2013
Annual salary review
Measures for bonuses for forthcoming year
Review of the performance of the Committee
Review of Chairman’s fees
47
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Activities
During 2012/13 the Committee:
agreed the performance targets for the annual bonus in the
financial year and monitored progress against those targets;
agreed the operation of the long-term incentive plans and
policy for executive share scheme awards to new recruits,
and promotions, including the level of individual awards,
performance conditions, and measurement and validation
of the out-turn of prior year awards;
agreed the award of annual incentives based on the prior
year’s performance;
recommended the 2011/12 Directors’ Remuneration
Report for endorsement by the Board and subsequent
approval by shareholders;
approved the Directors’ Shareholding Policy;
agreed amendment to the pension policy for employees
reaching lifetime allowance;
approved amendments to the rules of the Store Management
Incentive Share Scheme (‘SMISS’); and
reviewed the Company’s remuneration strategy.
Objectives for 2013:
In addition to its annual agenda for 2013, the Committee has
scheduled an additional meeting to:
review the executive remuneration arrangements; and
to consider and agree a new long-term incentive plan for
the Company.
Advisors
The Committee has authority to obtain the advice of external
independent remuneration consultants, and is solely
responsible for their appointment, retention and termination.
In February 2013, following a robust tender process, the
Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its
principal advisor. During the financial year to 2 February
2013, the following external advisors provided services to the
Committee. Unless otherwise stated, the advisors have no other
connection with the Group, and the Committee firmly believes
that the advice received was, and continues to be, objective
and independent:
FIT Remuneration Consultants LLP (‘FIT’)
FIT provided advice on the ongoing operation of employee and
executive share plans, and executive remuneration generally.
FIT is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group (the
professional body for executive remuneration consultants) and
adheres to its Code of Conduct. FIT provided no other services
to the Group during the year.
Allen & Overy LLP (‘A&O’)
A&O provided legal advice to the Committee on service
and employment contracts, and for other employment and
remuneration issues. A&O also provides advice to the Group
on other legal matters.
Towers Watson
Towers Watson provided benchmarking on the market
competitiveness for executives in the UK and overseas. Towers
Watson also provided advice to the Group on pensions and
related matters.
Remuneration Policy
The Group’s remuneration strategy is to attract, retain and
motivate executives of the highest quality, incentivising them to
deliver exceptional performance aligned with the interests of
shareholders, and to deliver the Group’s business plan. The
remuneration strategy continues to ensure that a significant
element of executives’ remuneration remains ‘at risk’.
The key principles of the Group’s remuneration policy are to:
provide executives with a remuneration package that
recognises the experience of the individual concerned and
the role fulfilled;
ensure performance-related remuneration constitutes
a substantial proportion of the remuneration package;
encourage a high-performance culture by offering
substantial reward only for exceptional performance;
ensure executive directors’ interests are aligned with
shareholders’ by delivering rewards in shares with
compulsory deferral and share ownership guidelines;
be competitive in the market in which the Group competes;
be fair and transparent; and
ensure remuneration arrangements apply consistently
throughout the Group.
The Committee intends to continue this policy and is
satisfied that there is an appropriate balance between the
fixed and variable elements of remuneration, as described
within this report.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
48
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Alignment of Remuneration Framework to Group Strategy
The chart and policy table below summarises how the Group’s remuneration framework is aligned to and supports the Creating
the Leader strategy:
Creating the Leader – Group Strategy Creating the Leader – Success Measures
Easier 1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
Easier
Like-for-like sales growth
Unique web users
Common 3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
Common
% of Group sales direct sourced
% of Group sales common
Retail profit margin
Expand 5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
Expand
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
One Team 7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming ‘Net Positive’
One Team
Group employee engagement scores
‘Net Positive’ sustainability dashboard
Remuneration Policy Table
Remuneration for executive directors for the financial year commencing 3 February 2013 consists of the following elements:
Element and Purpose Policy and Opportunity Operation and Performance Metrics
1 Base salary
This is the core element of pay
that reflects the individual’s
role, experience and
contribution to the Group.
Salaries are reviewed in January each year and are
benchmarked against a range of suitable comparator
groups, which currently include both the FTSE100 as a
whole and FTSE100 retailers as a relevant sub-set. The
Committee is also informed of pay levels in other large
European retailers.
The Committee does not apply a strict mathematical
approach to the data, which it considers to be only one
relevant input. Instead, the Committee has regard to its
overall assessment of what appropriate levels of salary
are, having regard to market and economic conditions,
affordability, the level of increases awarded to employees
generally and the individual’s contribution.
Base salaries are paid monthly in cash.
The base salaries of executive directors effective
from 31 January 2013 are as follows:
Ian Cheshire – £832,320
Kevin O’Byrne – £627,000
Philippe Tible – £486,840
Karen Witts – £484,500
2 Pension and benefits
To provide competitive
retirement benefits.
To aid retention and
remain competitive within
the marketplace.
Executive directors’ pension provision is by way of
contributions to defined contribution arrangements
equivalent to 30% of base salary for the Group CEO
and 20% for all other UK-based executive directors.
Prior to 1 July 2012, the Group CEO also participated in a
Defined Benefit (‘DB’) arrangement up to the scheme
earning cap of £136,200. The Defined Contribution
(‘DC’) arrangement then applied to the excess of his
salary. Following the closure of the DB scheme to future
accrual the pension arrangement moved solely to the
DC arrangement of 30% of the total salary.
Philippe Tible participates in a DB arrangement.
Entitlement to a pension is conditional on him remaining
with the Company until retirement (minimum age of 62).
The Company provides the following benefits: car
or car allowance, allowance for financial planning,
medical insurance and life assurance cover equal
to four times base salary.
The cost of benefit elements provided to executive
directors is disclosed in the table on page 52.
3 Annual bonus
To incentivise executives
to achieve/exceed annual
financial, strategic and
personal objectives set by
the Committee at the start
of each financial year.
Annual bonus is delivered under the Kingfisher Incentive
Share Scheme (KIS).
The KIS comprises the ‘KIS Cash Scheme’ and the ‘KIS
Share Scheme’.
Senior executives may receive a performance-related
cash bonus under the KIS Cash Scheme, and a
contingent share award under the KIS Share Scheme,
in the proportion of 67% payable in cash and 33% in
deferred shares.
The on-target and maximum bonus payable are 100%
and 200% of base salary respectively.
The maximum level of bonus payable has remained
unchanged since 2006.
For the 2013/14 financial year, the performance
KPIs for the annual bonus are split as follows:
PROFIT 30% (year-on-year).
RELATIVE LIKE-FOR-LIKE SALES 30% (with
reference to movements in market size to
ensure real improvements in market share
are being rewarded).
DIRECT SOURCING & PRODUCTIVITY 20%.
PERSONAL OBJECTIVES 20% (Assessed
with reference to demonstrating the One
Team behaviours).
49
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Policy Table continued
Element and Purpose Policy and Opportunity Operation and Performance Metrics
3 Annual bonus continued The deferred shares have a three-year vesting period and
can be subject to forfeiture should the executive leave the
Group during the vesting period. Claw-back can apply
should the Committee decide the grant of deferred shares
was not justified.
On vesting, dividend ‘roll-up’ shares are available on
the same basis as described below for the Performance
Share Plan.
The profit and sales measures for Kevin O’Byrne
and Philippe Tible will be based on the results from
their respective divisions.
4 Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’)
To incentivise executives
to achieve superior returns
for shareholders.
Performance conditions are
aligned with shareholder
interests and the Group’s
strategic objectives.
Retention of executives over
the performance period of
the awards.
The general policy is for awards to be granted on an
annual basis, subject to a three-year vesting period
and stretching performance conditions.
The maximum annual award is 200% of base salary,
or 500% of base salary in exceptional circumstances.
Consistent with the Creating the Leader strategy, a one-off
award of 500% of salary was made in June 2011. This
single award replaced the 200% annual awards which
would have taken place in 2011, 2012 and 2013. This
creates focus on a single three-year period which matches
the Creating the Leader phase and is smaller than the
three annual awards would have been. The award vests
in two equal tranches in June 2014 and June 2015.
Shares delivered on the exercise of an award receive
additional dividend ‘roll-up’ shares calculated on the
basis of a notional purchase of shares on each relevant ex-
dividend date using that day’s closing mid-market price.
Vesting of the awards made in June 2011 is based
50% on EPS and 50% on KEP (a version of
economic profit as explained on page 56).
The EPS performance condition for the 2011
awards requires EPS at the end of the three-year
vesting period to be at least 25.8p for 15% of that
part of the award to vest and 31.2p for 100% of
that part of the award to vest.
The KEP performance condition requires the
Group’s aggregate KEP over the three-year
performance period to be at least £229 million for
15% of that part of the award to vest and £386
million for 100% of that part to vest.
Any exchange rate upsides/downsides are removed
from the results, since they are deemed to be
outside the executive directors’ control.
5 Shareholding requirements
To ensure alignment of
interests of executives and
shareholders over the
long term.
Executive directors are required to build a significant
shareholding in the Company before the fifth anniversary
of the date of their appointment. This is a minimum of
200% of base salary by January 2013 for Ian Cheshire,
100% of base salary by October 2013 for Kevin O’Byrne
and Philippe Tible; and 100% of base salary by 1 October
2017 for Karen Witts. For Philippe Tible this is an increase
from his position of 50% of salary to be met by April 2009,
prior to his appointment to the Board.
Performance metrics are not applicable.
The net value of vested but unexercised awards
held under the PSP count towards this requirement
as well as shares held under the KIS Share Scheme
which have no additional performance conditions.
Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’ Byrne have satisfied
their shareholding requirements as at the date of
this report.
6 Recruitment policy
To attract the services of the
most appropriate candidate
for the job whilst following the
principles of the Company’s
remuneration policy to the
extent possible.
It is difficult to be overly prescriptive regarding the
appropriate package for an unknown potential recruit.
The following is the Committee’s agreed policy but it may
need to be adapted in the event of recruitment in order to
obtain the services of the most appropriate candidate.
In principle, the pay of any new recruit would be
assessed following the same principles as for the
current executive directors.
The Committee would be mindful of best practice
guidelines in considering whether any enhanced PSP or
other award was necessary on recruitment (e.g. to buyout
awards forgone from the incoming executive’s previous
employer) and the appropriateness of performance
conditions in order to avoid paying more than it considers
necessary to secure the preferred candidate. However,
each case will need to be considered on its own facts at
the particular time.
As necessary to secure the appropriate candidate.
In the case of Karen Witts, who was recruited
during 2012/13, she was granted a PSP award
linked to our Creating the Leader strategy on a
time pro-rated basis according to the remaining
proportion of the vesting period. The awards she
forfeited on leaving her previous employer were
not bought out.
7 Chairman and non-executive
director fees
To attract and retain a
Chairman and non-executive
directors of the highest calibre.
The fees paid to the Chairman are determined by the
Remuneration Committee, while the fees of the non-
executive directors are determined by the Board with
affected persons absenting themselves as appropriate.
The Chairman’s fees are determined by reference to his
time commitment and relevant benchmark market data.
The Board determines non-executive directors’ fees under
a policy which seeks to recognise the time commitment,
responsibility and technical skills required to make a
valuable contribution to an effective Board.
The Board will review fees paid to non-executive directors
in similar companies and will review fees for non-executive
directors in February each year.
Details of the Chairman’s fees and the fees of non-
executive directors’ are disclosed on page 58.
Fees are paid monthly.
Non-executive directors do not participate in
any of the Company’s performance related pay
programmes. Non-executive directors are not
entitled to any compensation for loss of office.
The basic fee for non-executive directors effective
1 February 2013 is £61,200. Additional fees are
paid as follows:
Senior Independent Director – £17,425
Chairman of the Audit Committee – £20,000
Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee – £15,000
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
50
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Estimates of total future potential remuneration from 2013 remuneration packages
The tables and charts below provide estimates of the potential total future remuneration for each executive director in respect of the
remuneration opportunity granted to them in 2013/14. Potential outcomes based on different performance scenarios are provided
for each executive director.
Ian Cheshire
Value of package (£m)
LTIP Bonus Pension Bene?ts Salary
Total Remuneration Performance Charts
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Kevin O’Byrne
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Philippe Tible
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Karen Witts
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
Notes:
Salary: Base salary as at 31 January 2013.
Bene?ts: Estimate based on bene?ts received during 2012/2013.
Pension: Based on pension of 30% of salary for Ian Cheshire and of 20% of salary for Kevin O’Byrne. Philippe Tible’s pension is based on that for 2012/2013.
Bonus: 2013/2014 target and maximum award levels in accordance with plan rules. Nil payout for below threshold performance. Bonus includes both the cash
award and the deferred share element.
LTIP: Estimated value at target and maximum vesting based on proposed 2013/2014 performance measures. Nil payout for below threshold performance.
Share price movement has not been incorporated into the above ?gures.
+ Salary Salary Bene?ts Bene?ts + + +
Total
Remuneration
Bonus Bonus LTIP LTIP =
Pensions Pensions
0 20 40 60 80 100
51
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Performance scenarios
Below Threshold On-Target Maximum
Only the fixed pay elements (base salary,
benefits and pension) of the package are earned.
Minimum performance targets for the KIS and
PSP are not achieved.
Fixed pay elements plus on-target KIS plus
on-target PSP vesting.
KIS on-target performance is achieved,
resulting in a bonus of 50% of maximum –
100% of base salary.
For the PSP, the on-target vesting level is 55%
of maximum – 110% of base salary.
Fixed pay elements plus maximum KIS plus
maximum PSP award vesting.
KIS maximum is 200% of base salary.
PSP maximum is 200% of base salary on a
normal annual grant.
Total Shareholder Returns
The above graph shows Kingfisher’s total shareholder return (‘TSR’) for the five years to 2 February 2013, which assumes that
£100 was invested in Kingfisher on 2 February 2008. The Company chose the FTSE100 Index as an appropriate comparator for
this graph as Kingfisher has been a constituent of that index throughout the period.
Source: Thomson Reuters.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
King?sher FTSE 100
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
52
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Executive Directors’ Appointments, Terms & Remuneration
Executive directors’ service contracts
Provision Policy
Contract dates Ian Cheshire: 28 January 2008
Kevin O’Byrne: 1 October 2008
Philippe Tible: 1 October 2012
Karen Witts: 1 October 2012
Notice period 12 months’ notice by either the director or the Company.
Termination payment Ian Cheshire: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 15% of annual salary
(1)
. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Kevin O’Byrne: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 12% of annual salary
(1)
. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Philippe Tible: Termination terms are determined by the convention collective which applies to all French employees. A
termination payment would be made up of two parts: (i) the dismissal indemnity which is 3% of annual remuneration per
year of service and (ii) a payment for any unpaid notice which would be a maximum of three months’ remuneration. The
combination cost based on years of service to date is in the region of one times salary. Remuneration consists of base pay,
car benefit and cash bonus award.
Karen Witts: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 8.3% of annual salary. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Mitigation For UK-based executive directors, lower amounts are payable if the director commences lower-paid employment during the
12-month period following cessation of employment, and payments cease immediately when employment providing the
same or higher value remuneration is started.
Remuneration As described in this report.
Other benefits Car or car allowance and allowance for financial planning.
Non-cash benefits The Company provides a range of additional benefits, including medical insurance, life assurance cover equal to four times
base salary, a subsidised staff canteen, a staff discount card and 30 working days’ holiday per year.
Expenses Reimbursement of reasonably incurred costs in accordance with their duties.
Non-compete During employment and for 12 months after leaving. In respect of Philippe Tible, an amount equal to 50% of annual salary
and car benefit must be paid to him on a monthly basis following his termination of employment by the Company. This
amount is standard under French law in order to ensure that the non-compete provision is enforceable.
(1) The terms of the phased payments clauses appearing in the service contracts of Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’Byrne were in keeping with the governance
guidelines at the time the employee contracts were made. The Committee will keep its policy under review when appointing new directors and will carefully
consider the prevailing governance guidelines and legal requirements when structuring contracts for new directors.
Executive Directors’ Remuneration
The remuneration of the executive directors for the 2012/13 financial year is set out in the table below:
£’000 Salary Pension
Other
benefits
Bonus
(KIS)
(4)
Actual
remuneration
for 2012/13
Actual
remuneration
for
2011/12
(2)
PSP
(7)
Total
remuneration
for
2012/13
Ian Cheshire 816.0 253.1 30.8 502.7 1,611.5
(1)
2,616.0 1,011.4 2,622.9
Kevin O’Byrne 600.0 117.9 24.9 345.6 1,088.4 1,869.4 727.0 1,815.4
Euan Sutherland
(5)
600.0 120.0 24.6 – 744.6 1,729.0 – 744.6
Philippe Tible
(5),(6)
436.1 306.0 11.2 346.8 1,100.1 1,554.3 753.9 1,854.0
Karen Witts
(3)
158.3 31.7 8.7 97.5 296.2 – – 296.2
In additional to the Schedule 8 requirements, the table presents a total single figure and break down for the year per the proposed BIS regulations.
(1) Includes £8,888, the net equivalent gain following the exercise of 91,350 phantom options awarded in April 2002.
(2) The comparative figure for 2011/12 has been restated to include employer contributions into director’s pension arrangements.
(3) Karen Witts joined the Group on 1 October 2012.
(4) One third of the bonus awarded will be deferred into Kingfisher shares under the KIS Share Scheme and accordingly will be available to vest in April 2016.
(5) Euan Sutherland and Philippe Tible joined the Board on 1 October 2012. The table contains their total remuneration for the entire financial year rather than
from the date they joined the Board.
(6) Philippe Tible’s remuneration is paid in Euros and is converted to Sterling for the purpose of the table at the average exchange rate over the course of the
relevant year.
(7) The 2010 PSP vested post year-end on 5 May 2013 and was based on 50% EPS and 50% on relative TSR performance for Ian Cheshire and Kevin
O’Byrne, and divisional Retail Operating Profit for Philippe Tible. The out-turn of the EPS and Divisional Retail Operating Profit elements of the award was
100% of maximum based on strong Group performance over the three-year performance period. The TSR performance out-turn fell just below the median
of the FTSE 100 comparator group and so failed to meet the threshold of median +1%. Accordingly, the vesting levels for the 2010 PSP award were 50% of
award for Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’Byrne, and 100% for Philippe Tible. The award granted to Euan Sutherland will lapse in full following his departure
from the Group on 31 March 2013.
53
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
53
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Outcome for the 2012/13 Annual Bonus Scheme
The executive directors’ targets for the 2012/13 bonus were based on both corporate and individual objectives as set out below.
Measure Like-for-Like sales
Group operating
profit after tax KPI
Personal
performance
Weighting at maximum bonus 30% 30% 20% 20%
The KPI measure was Group sourcing achievement.
The outcomes achieved against each measure are summarised below.
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
(1)
Kevin O’Byrne
(2)
Philippe Tible
(2)
Measure
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
Profit/like-for-like sales objectives 0 0 0 15
KPI / Personal Performance 77 77 72 77
Total 31 31 29 40
(1) The bonus earned by Karen Witts was pro-rated from her date of joining the Group on 1 October 2012.
(2) The bonuses earned by Kevin O’Byrne and Philippe Tible were based upon performance of their Divisions.
Euan Sutherland forfeited rights to a bonus following his resignation.
Further details of the awards under the KIS Cash Scheme and KIS Share Scheme reflecting these outcomes for 2012/13 are set out
on page 55.
Directors’ pension benefits
Up until 30 June 2012, Ian Cheshire had an entitlement to part of his pension benefits through the Kingfisher defined benefit
pension scheme, which closed to future accrual of benefits on 30 June 2012 (subject to the scheme cap of £136,200 (2011/12:
£129,600)) and part through a defined contribution scheme, for which the Company contribution is 30% of base salary. From 1
July 2012 onwards his pension benefit was delivered solely through the Defined Contribution arrangement.
Kevin O’Byrne, Euan Sutherland and Karen Witts have an entitlement to a defined contribution pension, with a Company
contribution of 20% of base salary.
The Company operates a policy to limit pension contributions during the tax year up to the Annual Allowance, with the excess being
directed into a taxable monthly cash payment. Following pension and tax legislation changes effective 6 April 2012 on the reduction
of lifetime allowance from £1.8m to £1.5m, the Company has offered a fully taxable cash alternative, at no additional cost to the
Company, to directors wishing to exit the Defined Contribution scheme completely.
Kevin O’Byrne chose to leave the pension scheme on 5 April 2012 and opted to receive the Company pension contribution as a
taxable monthly cash supplement in full.
Philippe Tible is a member of a separate Group defined benefit pension scheme, for which eligibility requires him to retire with the
Kingfisher Group. There is therefore no concept of a deferred pension and if Philippe Tible left the Company for reasons other than
retirement, none of the pension rights built up would actually crystallise. The figures in the table below are based on a crystallised
pension and have not been discounted in any way for the risk of forfeiture.
The following table shows details required under both Schedule 8 to the Regulations under the Act and the Listing Rules as
they apply to Kingfisher for the year ended 2 February 2013. In respect of the Act, the details shown represent for the defined
benefit section:
• accrued pension benefits at the relevant dates;
• the increase in the amount of accrued pension during this year;
• the transfer value amounts as at 28 January 2012 and 2 February 2013; and
• the increase in transfer value between those dates, net of member contributions paid.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
54
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Accrued pension Transfer value
Age
Years in
service
Increase in
accrued
pension
£’000 pa
2012/13
£’000 pa
2011/12
£’000 pa
Increase in
transfer
value £’000
(net of
director’s
contribution)
2012/13
£’000
2011/12
£’000
Increase in
(3)
accrued
pension
£’000 pa
(net of
inflation)
Ian Cheshire
(1),(2)
53 14 2 33 32 72 596 519 0
Philippe Tible 61 9 26 152 126 537 2,810 2,272 24
The above table relates only to benefits accrued in the Final Salary section, and excludes any Money Purchase section or AVC benefits.
(1) Accrued pensions and transfer values include employer contributions (by way of bonus surrender) made in March 2004 of £15,000.
(2) Ian Cheshire’s pension benefit under the defined benefits scheme is based on a salary cap of £136,200 for the part year to 30 June 2012, when the
scheme was closed to future accrual.
(3) Addition information given to comply with the requirements of the listing rules.
The following table shows the employer contributions made to the defined contribution scheme, or cash alternative in relation to
service during the financial year to 2 February 2013:
Employer contributions to
defined contribution pension
scheme Cash alternative
(1)
Total
£’000 2012/13 2011/12 2012/13 2011/12 2012/13
Ian Cheshire 7.4 49.4 230.7
(2)
156.8 238.1
Kevin O’Byrne 3.3 36.7 114.6 83.3 117.9
Euan Sutherland 9.5 21.7 110.5 83.3 120.0
Karen Witts – n/a 31.7 n/a 31.7
(1) Following pension and tax legislation changes, effective 6 April 2011, tax relief on the value of pension contributions and defined benefit accrual has been
limited to £50k p.a. The Company has offered, as an alternative to contributions into the defined contribution pension scheme, a taxable cash payment to
the executive directors at no additional cost to the Company.
(2) The payment to Mr Cheshire includes a goodwill payment received following the closure of the Kingfisher defined benefit scheme and his transfer to the
Kingfisher defined contribution scheme. This payment was offered to all employees on the same terms.
55
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Long-Term Incentive Plans
KIS Share Scheme
Awards of contingent shares, in respect of the financial year ended 2 February 2013, were made post year-end in April 2013
(to vest in April 2016), to Ian Cheshire, Kevin O’Byrne, Philippe Tible and Karen Witts under the KIS Share Scheme to the value
of £167,552, £115,200, £115,603 and £32,511, respectively. As the awards will be made after publication of the accounts for
the financial year ended 2 February 2013, the detail will be disclosed in next year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Once the contingent share awards are made in respect of the bonus earned, the only qualifying condition for the award normally
to vest is to be in the employment of the Company at the vesting date.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market value
of shares at
date of grant
(p)
At start
of year
Awarded
in year
Dividend
roll-up
shares
awarded
during year
(1)
Exercised
in year
Lapsed in
(5)
year
At end
of year Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 21/04/2009 164.63 263,698 – 5,784 269,482
(2)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 260,971 – 8,808 – – 269,779 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 156,578 – 5,284 – – 161,862 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – – 11,400 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 170,495 5,753 – – 176,248 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 692,276 170,495 26,000 269,482 – 619,289
Kevin O’Byrne 21/04/2009 164.63 67,378 – 1,477 68,855
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 187,573 – 6,330 – – 193,903 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 112,211 – 3,787 – – 115,998 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – – 11,400 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 125,364 4,230 – – 129,594 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 378,191 125,364 16,195 68,855 – 450,895
Euan Sutherland
(5)
21/04/2009 164.63 99,782 – 2,188 101,970
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 163,601 – 5,521 – 169,122 – 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 91,524 – 3,088 – 94,612 – 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – 11,400 – 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 111,688 3,770 – 115,458 – 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 365,936 111,688 14,938 101,970 390,592 –
Philippe Tible 21/04/2009 164.63 170,241 – 3,734 173,975
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 125,558 – 4,237 – – 129,795 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 106,360 – 3,589 – – 109,949 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 85,498 2,885 – – 88,383 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 402,159 85,498 14,445 173,975 – 328,127
(1) The price used to calculate the number of dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p per share, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p per share,
being the market price on 10 October 2012.
(2) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (2 July 2012) was 288.4p per share.
(3) The KIS Share Awards granted over 10,917 shares on 6 May 2011 underpin options granted under the CSOP, further details of which can be found in
the section entitled ‘Company Share Option Plan’.
(4) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (1 June 2012) was 273.4p per share.
(5) All awards held by Euan Sutherland under the Scheme lapsed on his resignation on 19 December 2012.
Company Share Option Plan (‘CSOP’)
Included as an element of the KIS Share awards, the executive directors were granted options under the CSOP, an HMRC approved
plan. The CSOP is underpinned, in part, by a matching fixed value element of the KIS Share awards granted on the same date in
2011. On exercise, the proceeds of part of the KIS Share award are used to fund the exercise price of the CSOP award, providing
tax and NIC advantages for participants and potential NIC savings for Kingfisher at no additional cost to the Group. The total value
of the KIS Share award is not changed.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
At start
of year
Granted
during year
Exercised
during year
Lapsed
during
the year
At end
of year
Option price
(p)
(1)
Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 06/05/2011 10,917 – – – 10,917 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
Kevin O’Byrne 06/05/2011 10,917 – – – 10,917 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
Euan Sutherland 06/05/2011 10,917 – – 10,917
(2)
– 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
(1) The option price per share was calculated by reference to the average closing mid-market price of Kingfisher shares on the three dealing days immediately
before the date of grant.
(2) The award lapsed on Euan Sutherland’s resignation on 19 December 2012.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
56
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’)
The PSP remains the primary long-term share incentive plan for senior executives, which allows a maximum annual award not
exceeding 200% of base salary or 500% of base salary in exceptional circumstances.
Shares delivered on the vesting of an award receive additional dividend ‘roll-up’ shares calculated on the basis of a notional
purchase of shares on each relevant ex-dividend date using that day’s closing mid-market price. Shares used to satisfy awards
under the PSP are normally purchased in the market by the Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market
value of
shares at
date of
grant (p)
At start
of year
Awarded
in year
Dividend
roll-up
shares
awarded
during
year
(1)
Exercised
during year
Shares
lapsed
during
the year
At end
of year Vesting period Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 21/04/2009
(3)
164.63 1,052,697 – 26,294 725,000
(2)
25,265 328,726 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 698,914 – 23,589 – – 722,503 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,517,585 – 51,222 – – 1,568,807 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,269,196 – 101,105 725,000 25,265 2,620,036
Kevin O’Byrne 01/10/2008
(4)
126.60 721,503 – 24,353 – – 745,856 01/10/2011 01/10/2015
01/10/2008
(4)
126.60 721,503 – 24,353 – – 745,856 01/02/2012 01/10/2015
21/04/2009
(3)
164.63 756,624 – 17,048 681,145
(7)
18,159 74,368 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 502,343 – 16,955 – – 519,298 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,115,871 – 37,662 – – 1,153,533 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,817,844 120,371 681,145 18,159 3,238,911
Euan Sutherland 24/07/2008
(4)
112.87 1,460,832 – 32,560 1,493,392
(8)
– – 24/07/2012 24/07/2015
21/04/2009
(4)
164.63 493,450 – 10,823 504,273
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 327,614 – 11,057 – 338,671
(10)
05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,115,872 – 37,662 – – 1,153,534
(10)
17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,397,768 – 92,102 1,997,665 1,492,205
Philippe Tible 21/04/2008
(4)
126.63 936,778 – 20,548 957,326
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2015
21/04/2009
(4)
164.63 394,898 – 8,662 403,560
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 260,473 – 8,791 – – 269,264 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 611,984 – 20,656 – – 632,640 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
03/05/2012
(9)
290.16 – 245,722 2,840 – – 248,562 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 2,204,133 245,722 61,497 1,360,886 1,150,466
Karen Witts 16/10/2012
(11)
271.37 – 498,857 – – – 498,857 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total – 498,857 – – 498,857
(1) The price used to calculate the dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p per share, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p per share, being the
market price on 10 October 2012.
(2) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (2 July 2012) was 288.4p per share.
(3) Following the calculation of the achievement of the performance conditions attaching to the award, 97.6% of the award became exercisable.
(4) Following the calculation of the achievement of the performance conditions attaching to the award, 100% of the award became exercisable.
(5) Vesting of the awards is based 50% on EPS and 50% on TSR conditions. The EPS condition required EPS at the end of the three-year performance period
to be at least 20p for 15.625% of that part to vest and 23p for vesting in full of that part of the award. The TSR condition requires the Group’s TSR to be
at least median plus 1% for 15.625% to vest and upper quintile plus 1% for it all to vest. In both cases, intermediate performance vests on a sliding scale
basis. Philippe Tible’s award was based on the retail operating profit for his division the targets for which are aligned with the Group EPS targets. The
results which were confirmed after the year-end are shown in the Executive Directors’ Remuneration table.
(6) Vesting of the awards is based 50% on EPS and 50% on Kingfisher Economic Profit (‘KEP’). The EPS condition requires EPS at the end of the three-year
performance period to be at least 25.8p for 15% of that part to vest and 31.2p for vesting in full of that part of the award. The KEP condition required the
aggregate KEP over the three-year performance period to be at least £229 million for 15% of that part to vest and £386 million for vesting in full of that part
of the award. KEP is defined as the (Group post-tax retail profit less central costs, excluding exceptional items and property lease costs) – (two point average
of Group capital employed, including capitalised property leases and adjusted for pensions, multiplied by the Group’s lease adjusted WACC). 50% of the
vested shares will be released to participants in 2014 with the remaining 50% of the shares released in 2015. Philippe Tible’s award is based on these
50% Group measures and 50% on divisional retail operating profit and KEP measures which are aligned to the Group targets.
(7) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (1 June 2012) was 273.4p per share.
(8) Euan Sutherland exercised the award in two tranches. The market value of Kingfisher shares on the dates of exercise (24 July 2012 and 8 January 2013)
were 253.9p and 286.9p per share respectively.
(9) The additional award was made to Philippe Tible in recognition of the expansion of his role to bring him into line with other members of the Group executive
who received an award of 500% of salary compared to the original award Philippe received of 375% of salary. Vesting of the award will be dependent on
the same performance criteria as the award made on 17 June 2011.
(10) The awards held by Euan Sutherland will lapse following his departure from the Company on 31 March 2013.
(11) Karen Witts received an award under the PSP 2011 based on 285% of base salary. This was a time pro-rated award equivalent to the 500% award the
other executive directors received based on her joining date of 1 October 2012, partway through the vesting period.
57
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Award of Matching Shares to Ian Cheshire
As part of the terms of his appointment as Group Chief Executive in 2008, a one-off award was made to Ian Cheshire pursuant to
Listing Rule 9.4.2. Ian Cheshire purchased 266,667 shares in the Company and in turn received a Matching Award of 200% of
base salary (broadly a 4:1 match). The vesting of the Matching Award was subject to performance conditions relating to growth
in EPS over the vesting period. The Matching Award vested in full shortly after the 2011/12 financial year end as EPS over the
performance period exceeded the target for the maximum vesting of 19.6p.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market value of
shares at date of
grant At start of year
Dividend roll-up
shares awarded
during year
(1)
At end of year Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 01/02/2008 143.6p 1,257,444 42,442 1,299,886 01/02/2012 01/02/2015
(1) The price used to calculate the dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p being the market price on 5
October 2012.
Sharesave Scheme
A Sharesave Scheme is open to all eligible employees, including executive directors. As is the case with all savings-related share
option schemes, there are no performance criteria.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
At start
of year
Granted
during year
Exercised
during year
At end
of year
Option price
(p)
Date from which
exercisable Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 26/10/2011 4,522 – – 4,522 199.0 01/12/2014 01/06/2015
Total 4,522 – – 4,522
Kevin O’Byrne 03/11/2009 5,263 – 5,263
(1)
– 172.4 01/12/2012 01/06/2013
22/10/2012 – 4,147 – 4,147 217.0 01/12/2015 01/06/2016
Total 5,263 4,147 5,263 4,147
Euan
Sutherland
(2)
03/11/2009 5,263 – 5,263
(1)
– 172.4 01/12/2012 01/06/2013
22/10/2012 – 4,147 – 4,147 217.0 01/12/2015 01/06/2016
Total 5,263 4,147 5,263 4,147
(1) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (3 December 2012) was 276p per share.
(2) The option held by Euan Sutherland will lapse in full following his departure from the Company on 31 March 2013.
Closed incentive plans
Executive share options
There are outstanding awards under the Executive Share Option Scheme. This plan is now closed and no further awards will be
made. The full details of the plan can be found in previous Annual Reports. The performance conditions for all awards under this
plan have now been met. The last grants under the Executive Share Option Scheme were made on 17 April 2003. The outstanding
awards are as follows:
Number of ordinary shares
Date of grant At start of year
Exercised
during year At end of year
Option price
(p)
Date from which
exercisable Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 09/04/2002 91,350
(2)
91,350
(1)
– 290.08 09/04/2005 09/04/2012
08/10/2002 164,144 164,144
(3)
– 194.95 08/10/2005 08/10/2012
17/04/2003 134,538 – 134,538 237.85 17/04/2006 17/04/2013
Total 390,032 255,494 134,538
Philippe Tible 17/04/2003 52,105 – 52,105 237.85 17/04/2006 17/04/2013
Total 52,105 – 52,105
(1) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (26 March 2012) was 312.3p per share.
(2) A phantom option over 91,350 shares was granted to Ian Cheshire in addition to this option at the same option price, with the same performance
conditions and over the same maturity periods. On exercise, a net equivalent cash gain of £8,888 was paid as remuneration at that time and is disclosed
in the directors total remuneration table on page 52.
(3) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (24 September 2012) was 269.6p per share.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
58
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Dilution limits
Kingfisher’s share plans contain limits that set out the quantum of newly issued shares that may be used to satisfy awards granted
under those plans. These limits are in line with the current Association of British Insurers (‘ABI’) guidance on headroom limits
which provide that overall dilution under all plans should not exceed 10% over a ten-year period in relation to the Company’s issued
share capital, with a further limitation of 5% in any ten-year period on executive plans. The Company has always operated within
these limits.
Outside appointments for Executive Directors
Subject to the rules governing conflicts of interest, the Company encourages its executive directors to hold non-executive roles
outside the Group as it recognises that such roles can broaden their experience and knowledge, which can be of benefit to the
Group. Subject to the Committee’s agreement, any fees may be retained by the individual. Kevin O’Byrne is a non-executive
director, Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Land Securities Group plc, and is paid £60,000,
£10,000 and £17,500 respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees.
Ian Cheshire is a non-executive director and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee of Whitbread plc, and is paid £55,000 and
£15,000 respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees. In January 2011, Ian Cheshire was invited to act as the lead
non-executive member of the Department for Work and Pensions Board. He waives his fee for this role.
Euan Sutherland is a non-executive director of the Co-operative Food board and became a director of SuperGroup plc on
1 December 2012. He is paid £51,950 and £50,000 per annum respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees.
Chairman and Non-Executive Directors’ Terms and Fees
Chairman
Daniel Bernard was appointed Chairman on 3 June 2009, for an initial fixed three-year term, which was extended for an
additional three-year term on 14 June 2012 and will continue until June 2015, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the
Company’s Articles of Association, or by either party giving the other not less than six months’ prior written notice. His appointment
is documented in a letter of appointment and he is required to devote no fewer than two to three days a week to his duties as
Chairman. His appointment as Chairman will automatically terminate if he ceases to be a director of the Company. His fee,
determined by reference to his time commitment and relevant benchmark data, was set at €485,000 per annum with effect from
February 2012 and increased in line with salary increases to employees generally to €494,700 with effect from February 2013.
The Chairman’s fee is paid to a service company, Provestis, which also receives a monthly contribution of €5,150 towards the
cost of running the Chairman’s office in Paris. The Chairman’s remuneration is reviewed by the Remuneration Committee on
an annual basis.
Non-executive directors’ letters of engagement
Non-executive directors are appointed under letters of engagement. Appointments have historically been for an initial period of
three years and invitations to act for subsequent three-year terms are subject to a review of performance, and taking into account
the need to progressively refresh the Board.
The appointment may be terminated by either party giving the other not less than three months’ prior written notice, unless
terminated earlier in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, and the Company has no obligation to pay
compensation when their appointment terminates.
The Board determines the fees paid to non-executive directors under a policy which seeks to recognise the time commitment,
responsibility and technical skills required to make a valuable contribution to an effective Board. The Board will also review
information on fees paid to non-executive directors in similar companies. Non-executive director’s fees were reviewed by the
Board in January 2013 and the basic fee for a non-executive director was increased by 2% to £61,200 with effect from
February 2013. Future annual reviews of fees for non-executive directors will be conducted in January each year.
The non-executive directors do not participate in any of the Company’s performance-related pay programmes.
Non-executive remuneration
Current Directors Date of appointment Expiry of current term
Total length of service at
2 February 2013
Fee 2012/13
£’000
Fee 2011/12
£’000
Daniel Bernard
(1)
24/05/2006 30/06/2015 6 years 8 months 393.5 399.9
Andrew Bonfield 11/02/2010 15/12/2015 2 years 11 months 80.0 73.8
Pascal Cagni 17/11/2010 16/11/2013 2 years 2 months 60.0 56.4
Clare Chapman 02/12/2010 01/12/2013 2 years 1 month 75.0 32.3
Anders Dahlvig 16/12/2009 15/12/2015 3 years 1 month 60.0 56.4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 06/12/2015 6 years 1 month 60.0 56.4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 31/12/2014 1 year 1 month 77.4 6.1
Total Remuneration 805.9 681.3
(1) Daniel Bernard’s fee is paid in Euros, and the fee is converted to Sterling for the purpose of this table at the average exchange rate over the course of the
relevant year.
59
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Directors’ interests
The beneficial interests of the directors who held office at 2 February 2013 in the ordinary shares of Kingfisher plc are shown below:
Ordinary shares
2 February 2013
Ordinary shares
28 January 2012
Daniel Bernard 120,766 113,629
Andrew Bonfield 10,000 10,000
Pascal Cagni 30,000 –
Clare Chapman 6,990 –
Ian Cheshire 1,147,527 1,126,423
Anders Dahlvig 75,000 75,000
Janis Kong 24,000 24,000
Kevin O’Byrne 141,431 136,168
Mark Seligman 15,000 –
Philippe Tible 104,968 –
Karen Witts 58,186 –
As potential beneficiaries under the Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust (the ‘Trust’), Ian Cheshire, Kevin O’Byrne, Philippe Tible
and Karen Witts are deemed to have an interest in the Company’s ordinary shares held by the Trust. The Trust held 20.7 million
ordinary shares at 2 February 2013.
There have been no further changes in the above interests between 2 February 2013 and 25 March 2013.
There are no other non-beneficial interests.
In the independent auditor’s report on page 99, Deloitte LLP refers to the parts of the Directors’ Remuneration Report that are
subject to audit. These comprise the following sections in this report: the disclosures under headings ‘Executive directors’
remuneration’, ‘Directors’ pension benefits’, ‘KIS Share Scheme’, ‘Company Share Option Plan’, ‘Performance Share Plan’, ‘Award
of Matching Shares to Ian Cheshire’, ‘Sharesave Scheme’, ‘Closed incentive plans’, ‘Non-executive remuneration’ and ‘Directors’
interests’ on pages 52 to 59.
For and on behalf of the Committee
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
60
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated income statement
Year ended 2 February 2013
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Notes
Before
exceptional
items
Exceptional
items
(note 5) Total
Before
exceptional
items
Exceptional
items
(note 5) Total
Continuing operations:
Sales 4 10,573 – 10,573 10,831 – 10,831
Cost of sales (6,618) – (6,618) (6,748) – (6,748)
Gross profit 3,955 – 3,955 4,083 – 4,083
Selling and distribution expenses (2,766) (17) (2,783) (2,769) (9) (2,778)
Administrative expenses (524) (9) (533) (560) – (560)
Other income 36 – 36 33 (3) 30
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates 17 20 – 20 32 – 32
Operating profit 721 (26) 695 819 (12) 807
Analysed as:
Retail profit 4 781 (26) 755 882 (12) 870
Central costs (42) – (42) (43) – (43)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and
associates (18) – (18) (20) – (20)
Finance costs (19) – (19) (31) – (31)
Finance income 15 – 15 21 – 21
Net finance costs 6 (4) – (4) (10) – (10)
Profit before taxation 7 717 (26) 691 809 (12) 797
Income tax expense 9 (128) 1 (127) (165) 7 (158)
Profit for the year 589 (25) 564 644 (5) 639
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company 564 640
Non-controlling interests – (1)
564 639
Earnings per share 10
Basic 24.1p 27.5p
Diluted 23.8p 26.9p
Adjusted basic 22.3p 25.1p
Adjusted diluted 22.0p 24.6p
The proposed final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013, subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting, is 6.37p per share.
61
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Year ended 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Profit for the year 564 639
Actuarial (losses)/gains on post employment benefits 27 (29) 20
Currency translation differences
Group 122 (128)
Joint ventures and associates 8 (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value (losses)/gains (14) 10
(Gains)/losses transferred to inventories (8) 8
Tax on other comprehensive income (14) (9)
Other comprehensive income for the year 65 (109)
Total comprehensive income for the year 629 530
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company 629 530
Non-controlling interests – –
629 530
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
62
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Year ended 2 February 2013
Attributable to equity shareholders of the Company
£ millions Notes
Share
capital
Share
premium
Own
shares
held
Retained
earnings
Other
reserves
(note 29) Total
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
At 29 January 2012 372 2,199 (134) 2,869 413 5,719 8 5,727
Profit for the year – – – 564 – 564 – 564
Actuarial losses on post employment benefits 27 – – – (29) – (29) – (29)
Currency translation differences
Group – – – – 122 122 – 122
Joint ventures and associates – – – – 8 8 – 8
Cash flow hedges
Fair value losses – – – – (14) (14) – (14)
Gains transferred to inventories – – – – (8) (8) – (8)
Tax on other comprehensive income – – – (18) 4 (14) – (14)
Other comprehensive income for the year – – – (47) 112 65 – 65
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – 517 112 629 – 629
Share-based compensation – – – 9 – 9 – 9
New shares issued under share schemes 1 5 – – – 6 – 6
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 74 (68) – 6 – 6
Dividends – – – (221) – (221) – (221)
At 2 February 2013 373 2,204 (60) 3,106 525 6,148 8 6,156
At 30 January 2011 371 2,194 (42) 2,390 539 5,452 8 5,460
Profit for the year – – – 640 – 640 (1) 639
Actuarial gains on post employment benefits 27 – – – 20 – 20 – 20
Currency translation differences
Group – – – – (129) (129) 1 (128)
Joint ventures and associates – – – – (10) (10) – (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value gains – – – – 10 10 – 10
Losses transferred to inventories – – – – 8 8 – 8
Tax on other comprehensive income – – – (4) (5) (9) – (9)
Other comprehensive income for the year – – – 16 (126) (110) 1 (109)
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – 656 (126) 530 – 530
Share-based compensation – – – 32 – 32 – 32
New shares issued under share schemes 1 5 – – – 6 – 6
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 25 (23) – 2 – 2
Own shares purchased – – (117) – – (117) – (117)
Dividends – – – (178) – (178) – (178)
Purchase of non-controlling interests – – – (8) – (8) – (8)
At 28 January 2012 372 2,199 (134) 2,869 413 5,719 8 5,727
63
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated balance sheet
At 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Non-current assets
Goodwill 12 2,399 2,397
Other intangible assets 13 166 123
Property, plant and equipment 14 3,748 3,667
Investment property 15 66 55
Investments in joint ventures and associates 17 289 271
Post employment benefits 27 71 25
Deferred tax assets 25 17 23
Derivatives 23 55 66
Other receivables 19 18 17
6,829 6,644
Current assets
Inventories 18 2,083 1,844
Trade and other receivables 19 545 531
Derivatives 23 33 26
Current tax assets 9 1
Cash and cash equivalents 20 398 587
3,068 2,989
Total assets 9,897 9,633
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 21 (2,430) (2,356)
Borrowings 22 (99) (367)
Derivatives 23 (17) (6)
Current tax liabilities (289) (305)
Provisions 26 (35) (16)
(2,870) (3,050)
Non-current liabilities
Other payables 21 (115) (121)
Borrowings 22 (332) (375)
Derivatives 23 (12) (8)
Deferred tax liabilities 25 (303) (269)
Provisions 26 (38) (43)
Post employment benefits 27 (71) (40)
(871) (856)
Total liabilities (3,741) (3,906)
Net assets 4 6,156 5,727
Equity
Share capital 28 373 372
Share premium 2,204 2,199
Own shares held (60) (134)
Retained earnings 3,106 2,869
Other reserves 29 525 413
Total attributable to equity shareholders of the Company 6,148 5,719
Non-controlling interests 8 8
Total equity 6,156 5,727
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013 and signed on its behalf by:
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
Group Chief Executive Group Finance Director
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
64
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated cash flow statement
Year ended 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Operating activities
Cash generated by operations 31 730 827
Income tax paid (129) (148)
Net cash flows from operating activities 601 679
Investing activities
Purchase of businesses – (2)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 4 (316) (450)
Disposal of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 17 9
Interest received 18 19
Dividends received from joint ventures and associates 10 10
Net cash flows from investing activities (271) (414)
Financing activities
Interest paid (18) (22)
Interest element of finance lease rental payments (4) (5)
Repayment of bank loans (31) (10)
Repayment of Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (162) (30)
Payment on financing derivatives – (5)
Capital element of finance lease rental payments (12) (16)
New shares issued under share schemes 6 6
Own shares issued under share schemes 6 2
Own shares purchased – (117)
Purchase of non-controlling interests – (8)
Dividends paid to equity shareholders of the Company (221) (178)
Net cash flows from financing activities (436) (383)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts (106) (118)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts at beginning of year 485 636
Exchange differences 19 (33)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts at end of year 32 398 485
65
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
1 General information
Kingfisher plc (‘the Company’), its subsidiaries, joint ventures
and associates (together ‘the Group’) supply home improvement
products and services through a network of retail stores and
other channels, located mainly in the United Kingdom,
continental Europe and China.
The Company is incorporated in the United Kingdom. The
nature of the Group’s operations and its principal activities are
set out in the Business Review on pages 2 to 27.
The address of its registered office is 3 Sheldon Square,
Paddington, London W2 6PX.
The Company is listed on the London Stock Exchange.
These consolidated financial statements have been approved for
issue by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013.
2 Principal accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of
these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These
policies have been consistently applied to the years presented,
unless otherwise stated.
a. Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company, its
subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are made up to the
nearest Saturday to 31 January each year, except as disclosed
in note 17 and in note 4 of the Company’s separate financial
statements. The current financial year is the 53 weeks ended
2 February 2013 (‘the year’ or ‘2012/13’). The comparative
financial year is the 52 weeks ended 28 January 2012 (‘the
prior year’ or ‘2011/12’).
The directors of Kingfisher plc, having made appropriate
enquiries, consider that adequate resources exist for the Group
to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future
and that, therefore, it is appropriate to adopt the going concern
basis in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended 2 February 2013. Refer to the Directors’ statement
of responsibility on page 33.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the European Union (‘IFRS’) and those parts of the
Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under
IFRS and therefore the consolidated financial statements
comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS legislation.
There are no new standards, amendments or interpretations,
which are mandatory for the first time for the financial year
ended 2 February 2013, that are relevant and material for
the Group.
The following amendments and interpretations, which are
mandatory for the first time for the financial year ended
2 February 2013, are either not currently relevant or not
material for the Group:
• IFRS 1 (amendment), ‘Severe hyperinflation and
removal of fixed dates for first-time adopters’;
• IFRS 7 (amendment), ‘Disclosures – Transfers of
financial assets’; and
• IAS 12 (amended), ‘Deferred tax: Recovery of
underlying assets’.
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the
following new standards, amendments and interpretations,
which have not been applied in these financial statements, were
in issue but not yet effective (and in some cases had not yet
been adopted by the EU):
• IAS 1 (amended), ‘Presentation of items of other
comprehensive income’ (effective from 1 July 2012);
• IAS 19 (revised), ‘Employee benefits’ (effective from
1 January 2013);
• IFRS 1 (amended), ‘First time adoption’ on government
loans (effective from 1 January 2013);
• IFRS 7 (amended), ‘Disclosures – Offsetting financial assets
and financial liabilities’ (effective from 1 January 2013);
• IFRS 13, ‘Fair value measurement’ (effective from
1 January 2013);
• Annual improvements to IFRSs 2011 (effective from
1 January 2013);
• IFRS 10, ‘Consolidated financial statements’ (effective
from 1 January 2014);
• IFRS 11, ‘Joint arrangements’ (effective from
1 January 2014);
• IFRS 12, ‘Disclosure of interests in other entities’
(effective from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 27 (revised), ‘Separate financial statements’ (effective
from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 28 (revised), ‘Investments in associates and joint
ventures’ (effective from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 32 (amendment), ‘Financial instruments: Presentation’
on offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
(effective from 1 January 2014); and
• IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’ (effective from
1 January 2015).
The directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards
listed above will have a material impact on the financial
statements of the Group in future periods, except as follows:
• IAS 19 (revised) will principally impact the measurement and
presentation of defined benefit pension expense/income and
the disclosures for benefit plans. The most significant change
is expected to be the replacement of interest cost and
expected return on scheme assets with a single net finance
cost or return determined by applying the same discount
rate used to measure the defined benefit obligations to the
net defined benefit liability or asset. In addition, the revised
standard will reclassify the administrative costs of running
the UK scheme from net finance costs to operating costs.
The Group’s reported profit before taxation and net assets are
not expected to be materially impacted for 2012/13 (restated)
and 2013/14, however in future years they may be impacted
by the change in the finance cost/return calculation
depending on market interest rates, rates of return
and the mix of scheme assets;
• IAS 1 (amended) will principally require items presented in
‘other comprehensive income’ (OCI) to be grouped together
based on whether items can be reclassified to profit or loss
subsequently. The amendments do not address which items
are presented in OCI;
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
66
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
• IFRS 13 clarifies the measurement of fair value for certain
assets and liabilities as well as the associated disclosures; and
• IFRS 9 will impact both the measurement and disclosures
of financial instruments.
Beyond the information above, it is not practicable to provide
a reasonable estimate of the effect of these standards until a
detailed review has been completed.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
under the historical cost convention, as modified by the use
of valuations for certain financial instruments, share-based
payments and post employment benefits. A summary of the
Group’s principal accounting policies is set out below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
IFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates and
assumptions. It also requires management to exercise its
judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting
policies. The areas involving critical accounting estimates and
judgements, which are significant to the consolidated financial
statements, are disclosed in note 3.
Use of non-GAAP measures
In the reporting of financial information, the Group uses certain
measures that are not required under IFRS, the generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) under which the Group
reports. Kingfisher believes that retail profit, adjusted pre-tax
profit, effective tax rate, adjusted post-tax profit and adjusted
earnings per share provide additional useful information on
underlying trends to shareholders. These and other non-GAAP
measures such as net debt/cash are used by Kingfisher for
internal performance analysis and incentive compensation
arrangements for employees. The terms ‘retail profit’,
‘exceptional items’, ‘adjusted’, ‘effective tax rate’ and ‘net
debt/cash’ are not defined terms under IFRS and may therefore
not be comparable with similarly titled measures reported by
other companies. They are not intended to be a substitute for,
or superior to, GAAP measures.
Retail profit is defined as continuing operating profit before
central costs (principally the costs of the Group’s head office),
exceptional items, amortisation of acquisition intangibles
and the Group’s share of interest and tax of joint ventures
and associates.
The separate reporting of non-recurring exceptional items,
which are presented as exceptional within their relevant income
statement category, helps provide an indication of the Group’s
underlying business performance. The principal items which
are included as exceptional items are:
• non-trading items included in operating profit such as
profits and losses on the disposal, closure or impairment
of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and investments
which do not form part of the Group’s trading activities;
• profits and losses on the disposal of properties; and
• the costs of significant restructuring and incremental
acquisition integration costs.
The term ‘adjusted’ refers to the relevant measure being
reported for continuing operations excluding exceptional items,
financing fair value remeasurements, amortisation of acquisition
intangibles, related tax items and prior year tax items. Financing
fair value remeasurements represent changes in the fair value of
financing derivatives, excluding interest accruals, offset by fair
value adjustments to the carrying amount of borrowings and
other hedged items under fair value hedge relationships.
Financing derivatives are those that relate to underlying items
of a financing nature.
The effective tax rate represents the effective income tax
expense as a percentage of continuing profit before taxation
excluding exceptional items. Effective income tax expense is
the continuing income tax expense excluding tax on exceptional
items and tax adjustments in respect of prior years and the
impact of changes in tax rates on deferred tax.
Net debt/cash comprises borrowings and financing derivatives
(excluding accrued interest), less cash and cash equivalents
and current other investments.
b. Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial
statements of the Company, its subsidiaries, joint ventures
and associates.
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiary undertakings are all entities over which the Group
has the power to govern the financial and operating policies,
generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of
the voting rights. Subsidiary undertakings acquired are recorded
under the acquisition method of accounting and their results
included from the date of acquisition. The results of subsidiaries
which have been disposed are included up to the effective date
of disposal.
The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary
is the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred
and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration
transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting
from a contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related
costs are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business
combination are measured initially at their fair values at the
acquisition date. On an acquisition-by-acquisition basis,
the Group recognises any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s
proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets. Subsequent to
acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests is
the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-
controlling interests’ share of subsequent changes in equity.
Total comprehensive income is attributed to non-controlling
interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having
a deficit balance. Prior to 31 January 2010, losses exceeding
the non-controlling interest in the equity of a subsidiary were
required to be attributed to the parent; the resulting deficit
balances were not restated following amendment to IAS 27,
‘Consolidated and separate financial statements’.
The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of
any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the acquisition-
date fair value of any previous equity interests in the acquiree
over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill. If this is less than the fair value of
the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the case of
a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised directly
in the income statement.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains
on transactions between Group companies are eliminated.
Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction
provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.
Accounting policies of acquired subsidiaries have been
changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the
policies adopted by the Group.
67
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
(ii) Joint ventures and associates
Joint ventures are entities over which the Group has joint
control, with a third party, to govern the financial and operating
activities of that entity. The equity method is used to account for
the Group’s investments in joint ventures.
Associates are entities over which the Group has the ability
to exercise significant influence but not control, generally
accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50%
of the voting rights. The equity method is used to account
for the Group’s investments in associates.
Under the equity method investments are initially recognised at
cost. The Group’s investments in joint ventures and associates
include goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment losses)
identified on acquisition.
The Group’s share of post-acquisition profits or losses is
recognised in the income statement within operating profit,
and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is
recognised in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition
movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of
the investment. When the Group’s share of losses equals or
exceeds its interest, including any other long term receivables,
the Group does not recognise any further losses, unless it has
incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint
venture or associate.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its
joint ventures and associates are eliminated to the extent of the
Group’s interest. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless
the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset
transferred. Accounting policies of joint ventures and associates
have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with
the policies adopted by the Group.
c. Foreign currencies
(i) Presentation and functional currencies
The consolidated financial statements are presented in
Sterling, which is the Group’s presentation currency. Items
included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s
entities are measured using the currency of the primary
economic environment in which the entity operates
(i.e. its functional currency).
(ii) Transactions and balances
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates
prevailing on the date of the transaction or, for practical
reasons, at average monthly rates where exchange rates
do not fluctuate significantly.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Sterling at the rates of exchange
at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences on monetary
items are taken to the income statement. Exceptions to this are
where the monetary items form part of the net investment in a
foreign operation or are designated and effective net investment
or cash flow hedges. Such exchange differences are initially
deferred in equity.
(iii) Group companies
The balance sheets of overseas subsidiary undertakings
are expressed in Sterling at the rates of exchange at the
balance sheet date. Profits and losses of overseas subsidiary
undertakings are expressed in Sterling at average exchange
rates for the period. Exchange differences arising on the
retranslation of foreign operations are recognised in a separate
component of equity.
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the
retranslation of the net investment in foreign entities, and of
borrowings and other currency instruments designated as
hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign
operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in
the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition
of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the
foreign entity and translated at the rates of exchange at the
balance sheet date.
Principal rates of exchange against Sterling:
2012/13 2011/12
Average
rate
Year end
rate
Average
rate
Year end
rate
Euro 1.23 1.15 1.15 1.19
US Dollar 1.59 1.57 1.60 1.57
Polish Zloty 5.13 4.79 4.80 5.04
Chinese Renminbi 10.01 9.80 10.31 9.94
d. Revenue recognition
Sales represent the supply of home improvement products and
services. Sales exclude transactions made between companies
within the Group, Value Added Tax, other sales-related taxes
and are net of returns, trade and staff discounts.
Sales of in-store products are generally recognised at the point
of cash receipt. Where award credits such as vouchers or loyalty
points are provided as part of the sales transaction, the amount
allocated to the credits is deferred and recognised when the
credits are redeemed and the Group fulfils its obligations to
supply the awards.
For delivered products and services, sales are recognised either
when the product has been delivered or, for installation income,
when the service has been performed. Sales from delivered
products and services represent only a small component of
the Group’s sales as the majority relates to in-store purchases
of products.
Other income is generally composed primarily of external rental
income and profits and losses on disposal of assets. Rental
income from operating leases is recognised on a straight line
basis over the term of the relevant lease. Initial direct costs
incurred in negotiating and arranging an operating lease are
added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and
recognised on a straight line basis over the lease term.
e. Rebates
Rebates received from suppliers mainly comprise volume
related rebates on the purchase of inventories.
Volume related rebates are recognised based on actual
purchases in the period as a proportion of total purchases
forecast over the rebate period where it is probable the rebates
will be received and the amounts can be estimated reliably.
Rebates relating to inventories purchased but still held at the
balance sheet date are deducted from the carrying value so
that the cost of inventories is recorded net of applicable rebates.
Such rebates are credited to the income statement when the
goods are sold.
f. Dividends
Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the
Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised
when they are approved by the Company’s shareholders.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
68
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
g. Intangible assets
(i) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising
from assets acquired in a business combination that are
not individually identified and separately recognised.
Such benefits include future synergies expected from the
combination and intangible assets not meeting the criteria
for separate recognition.
Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
Goodwill is not amortised and is tested annually for impairment
by assessing the recoverable amount of each cash generating
unit or groups of cash generating units to which the goodwill
relates. The recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the
net present value of expected future pre-tax cash flows (‘value-
in-use’) or fair value less costs to sell if higher. The discount
rate applied is based upon the Group’s weighted average cost
of capital with appropriate adjustments for the risks associated
with the relevant cash generating unit or groups of cash
generating units. When the recoverable amount of the
goodwill is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is
recognised immediately in the income statement which cannot
subsequently be reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of
an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the
entity sold.
(ii) Computer software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the
basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the
specific software. These costs are amortised over their
estimated useful lives of two to ten years.
Costs that are directly associated with the production of
identifiable and unique software products controlled by the
Group, which are expected to generate economic benefits
exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible
assets. Direct costs include software development, employee
and consultancy costs and an appropriate portion of relevant
overheads. These costs are amortised over their estimated
useful lives of two to ten years. Costs associated with identifying,
sourcing, evaluating or maintaining computer software are
recognised as an expense as incurred.
h. Property, plant and equipment
(i) Cost
Property, plant and equipment held for use in the business
are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any
provisions for impairment.
(ii) Depreciation
Depreciation is provided to reflect a straight line reduction
from cost to estimated residual value over the estimated useful
life of the asset as follows:
Freehold land – not depreciated
Freehold and long leasehold buildings – over remaining useful life
Short leasehold land and buildings – over remaining period
of the lease
Fixtures and fittings – between 4 and 20 years
Computers and electronic equipment – between 3 and 5 years
Motor cars – 4 years
Commercial vehicles – between 3 and 10 years
Long leaseholds are defined as those having remaining lease
terms of more than 50 years. Asset lives and residual values are
reviewed at each balance sheet date.
(iii) Impairment
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment
is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference
to the net present value of expected future pre-tax cash flows
(‘value-in-use’) of the relevant cash generating unit or fair value
less costs to sell if higher. The discount rate applied is based
upon the Group’s weighted average cost of capital with
appropriate adjustments for the risks associated with the
relevant cash generating unit. Any impairment in value is
charged to the income statement in the period in which
it occurs.
(iv) Disposal
The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset
is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds
and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the
income statement. Sales of land and buildings are accounted
for when there is an unconditional exchange of contracts.
(v) Subsequent costs
Subsequent costs are included in the related asset’s carrying
amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only
when it is probable that future economic benefits associated
with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can
be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are
charged to the income statement in the period in which they
are incurred.
i. Leased assets
Where assets are financed by leasing agreements which give
rights approximating to ownership, the assets are treated as if
they had been purchased outright. The amount capitalised is
the lower of the fair value or the present value of the minimum
lease payments during the lease term at the inception of the
lease. The assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease
term or their useful life. Obligations relating to finance leases,
net of finance charges in respect of future periods, are included,
as appropriate, under borrowings due within or after one year.
The finance charge element of rentals is charged to finance
costs in the income statement over the lease term.
All other leases are operating leases and the rental payments
are generally charged to the income statement in the period
to which the payments relate, except for those leases which
incorporate fixed minimum rental uplift clauses. Leases which
contain fixed minimum rental uplifts are charged to the income
statement on a straight line basis over the lease term.
Where a lease is taken out for land and buildings combined,
the buildings element of the lease may be capitalised as a
finance lease if it meets the criteria for a finance lease, but the
land element will in most cases be classified as an operating
lease. If the contracted lease payments are not split between
land and buildings in the lease contract, the split is made based
on the market values of the land and buildings at the inception
of the lease.
Incentives received or paid to enter into lease agreements are
released to the income statement on a straight line basis over
the lease term.
69
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
j. Investment property
Investment property is property held by the Group to earn rental
income or for capital appreciation. The Group’s investment
properties are carried at cost less depreciation and provision for
impairment. Depreciation is provided on a consistent basis with
that applied to property, plant and equipment.
k. Capitalisation of borrowing costs
Interest on borrowings to finance the construction of properties
held as non-current assets is capitalised from the date work
starts on the property to the date when substantially all the
activities which are necessary to get the property ready for
use are complete. Where construction is completed in parts,
each part is considered separately when capitalising interest.
Interest is capitalised before any allowance for tax relief.
l. Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable
value, on a weighted average cost basis.
Trade discounts and rebates received are deducted in
determining the cost of purchase of inventories. Cost includes
appropriate attributable overheads and direct expenditure
incurred in the normal course of business in bringing goods
to their present location and condition. Costs of inventories
include the transfer from equity of any gains or losses on
qualifying cash flow hedges relating to purchases.
Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price in the
ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary
to make the sale. Write downs to net realisable value are made
for slow moving, damaged or obsolete items and other events
or conditions resulting in expected selling prices being lower
than cost. The carrying value of inventories reflects known and
expected losses of product in the ordinary course of business.
m. Employee benefits
(i) Post employment benefits
The Group operates various defined benefit and defined
contribution pension schemes for its employees, some of which
are required by local legislation. A defined benefit scheme is a
pension scheme which defines an amount of pension benefit
which an employee will receive on retirement. A defined
contribution scheme is a pension scheme under which the
Group usually pays fixed contributions into a separate entity.
In all cases other than some of the legally required schemes,
a separate fund is being accumulated to meet the accruing
liabilities. The assets of each of these funds are either held
under trusts or managed by insurance companies and are
entirely separate from the Group’s assets.
The asset or liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect
of defined benefit pension schemes is the fair value of scheme
assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at
the balance sheet date, together with an adjustment for any past
service costs not yet recognised. The defined benefit obligation
is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the
projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined
benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated
future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality
corporate bonds which are denominated in the currency in
which the benefits will be paid and which have terms to maturity
approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are credited or charged
to the statement of comprehensive income as they arise.
Past service costs are recognised immediately in the income
statement, unless the changes to the pension scheme are
conditional on the employees remaining in service for a
specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the
past service costs are amortised on a straight line basis over
the vesting period.
For defined contribution schemes, the Group pays contributions
to privately administered pension schemes on a contractual
basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the
contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognised
as an employee benefit expense when they are due.
(ii) Share-based compensation
The Group operates several equity-settled, share-based
compensation schemes. The fair value of the employee
services received in exchange for the grant of options or
deferred shares is recognised as an expense and is calculated
using Black-Scholes and stochastic models. The total amount
to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by
reference to the fair value of the options or deferred shares
granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting
conditions. The value of the charge is adjusted to reflect
expected and actual levels of options vesting due to
non-market vesting conditions.
n. Taxation
The income tax expense represents the sum of the tax
currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable
is based on taxable profit for the year.
Taxable profit differs from profit before taxation as reported
in the income statement because it excludes items of income
or expense which are taxable or deductible in other years or
which are never taxable or deductible.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable
on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding
tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit and is
accounted for using the balance sheet liability method.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable
temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognised to
the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available
against which deductible temporary differences or unused tax
losses can be utilised. Deferred tax liabilities are not recognised
if the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition
of goodwill in a business combination. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference
arises from the initial recognition (other than in a business
combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction
which affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting
profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable
temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates, except where the Group is able
to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is
probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in
the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at
each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is
no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available
to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Current and deferred tax are calculated using tax rates which
have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance
sheet date and are expected to apply in the period when the
liability is settled or the asset is realised.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
70
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
Current and deferred tax are charged or credited to the income
statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited
directly to equity, in which case the current or deferred tax is
also recognised directly in equity.
Current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against
each other when they relate to income taxes levied by the same
tax jurisdiction and when the Group intends to settle its current
tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
o. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present legal
or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is more
likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to
settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are
determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a
pre-tax rate which reflects current market assessments of the
time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific
to the liability.
p. Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are
derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows
from the financial asset expire or the Group has substantially
transferred the risks and rewards of ownership. Financial
liabilities (or a part of a financial liability) are derecognised
when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged
or cancelled or expires.
(i) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits
held on call with banks and other short term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less.
(ii) Borrowings
Interest bearing borrowings are recorded at the proceeds
received, net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured
at amortised cost. Where borrowings are in designated and
effective fair value hedge relationships, adjustments are made
to their carrying amounts to reflect the hedged risks. Finance
charges, including premiums payable on settlement or
redemption and direct issue costs, are amortised to the
income statement using the effective interest method.
(iii) Other investments
Other investments include bank deposits, government bonds
and other short term investments with original maturities of
more than three months.
(iv) Trade receivables
Trade receivables are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost less any provision
for bad and doubtful debts.
(v) Trade payables
Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost.
(vi) Derivatives and hedge accounting
Where hedge accounting is not applied, or to the extent to
which it is not effective, changes in the fair value of derivatives
are recognised in the income statement as they arise. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives transacted as hedges of operating
items and financing items are recognised in operating profit
and net finance costs respectively.
Derivatives are initially recorded at fair value on the date a
derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently carried
at fair value. The accounting treatment of derivatives and other
financial instruments classified as hedges depends on their
designation, which occurs at the start of the hedge relationship.
The Group designates certain financial instruments as:
• a hedge of the fair value of an asset or liability or
unrecognised firm commitment (‘fair value hedge’);
• a hedge of a highly probable forecast transaction or firm
commitment (‘cash flow hedge’); or
• a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (‘net
investment hedge’).
Fair value hedges
For an effective hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value,
the hedged item is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable
to the risk being hedged with the corresponding entry being
recorded in the income statement. Gains or losses from
remeasuring the corresponding hedging instrument are
recognised in the same line of the income statement.
Cash flow hedges
Changes in the effective portion of the fair value of derivatives
that are designated as hedges of future cash flows are
recognised directly in equity, with any ineffective portion
being recognised immediately in the income statement
where relevant. If the cash flow hedge of a firm commitment or
forecast transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial
asset or liability, then, at the time it is recognised, the associated
gains or losses on the derivative that had previously been
recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement of
the non-financial asset or liability. For hedges that result in the
recognition of a financial asset or liability, amounts deferred in
equity are recognised in the income statement in the same
period in which the hedged item affects net profit or loss.
Net investment hedges
Where the Group hedges net investments in foreign operations
through foreign currency borrowings, the gains or losses on the
retranslation of the borrowings are recognised directly in equity.
If the Group uses derivatives as the hedging instrument, the
effective portion of the hedge is recognised in equity, with any
ineffective portion being recognised immediately in the income
statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are
recycled through the income statement on disposal of the
foreign operation.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the Group documents
in advance the relationship between the item being hedged
and the hedging instrument. The Group also documents and
demonstrates an assessment of the relationship between the
hedged item and the hedging instrument, which shows that the
hedge has been and will be highly effective on an ongoing basis.
The effectiveness testing is re-performed at each period end to
ensure that the hedge remains highly effective.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies
for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gain or loss
on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is retained in
equity until the highly probable forecast transaction occurs.
If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
net cumulative gain or loss recognised in equity is transferred
to the income statement.
71
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other
host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their
risks and characteristics are not closely related to those
of host contracts, and the host contracts are not carried at
fair value with unrealised gains or losses reported in the
income statement.
3 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements under
IFRS requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the application of policies and reported amounts.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are
based on historical experience and other factors including
expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. The estimates and assumptions which have a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year
are discussed below.
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
As required, the Group applies procedures to ensure that its
assets are carried at no more than their recoverable amount.
The procedures, by their nature, require estimates and
assumptions to be made. The most significant are set
out below.
The Group is required, on at least an annual basis, to test
whether goodwill has suffered any impairment. As part of this
testing the recoverable amounts of cash generating units have
been determined based on value-in-use calculations. The
use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows
expected to arise from the continuing operation of the cash
generating unit and the choice of suitable discount and long
term growth rates in order to calculate the present value of the
forecast cash flows. Actual outcomes could vary significantly
from these estimates. Further information on the impairment
tests undertaken, including the key assumptions, is given
in note 12.
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment
is conducted, the recoverable amount of an asset or a cash
generating unit is determined as the higher of fair value less
costs to sell and value-in-use, calculated on the basis of
management’s assumptions and estimates.
At each reporting date the Group is required to assess whether
there is objective evidence that its investments in associates and
joint ventures may be impaired. This requires estimates of the
investments’ recoverable amounts, including present values
of the Group’s share of future cash flows.
Inventories
As inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable
value this requires the estimation of the eventual sales price of
goods to customers in the future. A high degree of judgement
is applied when estimating the impact on the carrying value of
inventories of factors such as slow moving items, shrinkage,
damage and obsolescence. The quantity, age and condition
of inventories are regularly measured and assessed as part
of range reviews and inventory counts undertaken through
out the year and across the Group. Refer to note 18 for
further information.
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions
and there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of
business. Significant judgement may therefore be required in
determining the provision for income taxes in each territory. The
Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based
on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the
final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts
which were initially recorded, such differences will impact the
income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which
such determination is made. These adjustments in respect of
prior years are recorded in the income statement or directly
in equity as appropriate. Refer to notes 9 and 25 for
further information.
Restructuring provisions
The Group carries a number of provisions in relation to historical
and ongoing restructuring programmes. The most significant
part of the provisions is the cost to exit stores and property
contracts. The ultimate costs and timing of cash flows are
dependent on exiting the property lease contracts on the
closed stores and subletting surplus space. Refer to note
26 for further information.
Post employment benefits
The present value of the defined benefit liabilities recognised
on the balance sheet is dependent on a number of assumptions
including interest rates of high quality corporate bonds,
inflation and mortality rates. The net interest charge or return
is dependent on both the interest rates of high quality corporate
bonds and the assumed investment returns on scheme assets.
The assumptions are based on the conditions at the time
and changes in these assumptions can lead to significant
movements in the estimated obligations. To help the reader
understand the impact of changes in the key assumptions,
a sensitivity analysis is provided in note 27.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
72
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
4 Segmental analysis
Income statement
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Sales 4,316 4,194 1,029 1,034 10,573
Retail profit 234 397 107 43 781
Exceptional items (26)
Central costs (42)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (18)
Operating profit 695
Net finance costs (4)
Profit before taxation 691
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Sales 4,338 4,470 1,094 929 10,831
Retail profit 271 423 135 53 882
Exceptional items (12)
Central costs (43)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (20)
Operating profit 807
Net finance costs (10)
Profit before taxation 797
The current financial year is the 53 weeks ended 2 February 2013 with the comparative financial year being the 52 weeks ended
28 January 2012. This only impacts the UK & Ireland businesses with all of the other businesses reporting on a calendar basis as a
result of local requirements. The effect of the 53rd week on the results of the Group is the inclusion of an additional £72m sales and
an immaterial benefit to retail profit.
Balance sheet
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Segment assets 1,458 1,443 600 620 4,121
Central liabilities (402)
Goodwill 2,399
Net cash 38
Net assets 6,156
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Segment assets 1,403 1,309 505 596 3,813
Central liabilities (395)
Goodwill 2,397
Net debt (88)
Net assets 5,727
73
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
4 Segmental analysis continued
Other segmental information
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Central Total
Capital expenditure 125 93 49 43 6 316
Depreciation and amortisation 133 72 14 26 3 248
Impairment losses 8 – – – – 8
Non-current assets
(1)
3,332 1,984 584 459 20 6,379
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Central Total
Capital expenditure 225 118 55 48 4 450
Depreciation and amortisation 122 77 12 25 1 237
Impairment losses 2 1 – 4 – 7
Non-current assets
(1)
3,344 1,923 524 438 13 6,242
(1) Non-current assets exclude investments in joint ventures and associates, post employment benefits, deferred tax assets, derivatives and other receivables.
The operating segments disclosed above are based on the information reported internally to the Board of Directors and
Group Executive. This information is predominantly based on the geographical areas in which the Group operates and
which are managed separately. The Group only has one business segment being the supply of home improvement products
and services.
The ‘Other International’ segment consists of Poland, China, Spain, Russia, the joint venture Koçta s¸ in Turkey and the
associate Hornbach which has operations in Germany and other European countries. Poland has been shown separately
due to its significance.
Central costs principally comprise the costs of the Group’s head office. Central liabilities comprise unallocated head office
and other central items including pensions, interest and tax.
5 Exceptional items
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Included within selling and distribution expenses
Ireland restructuring (21) –
UK restructuring 4 2
UK stores acquisition integration – (11)
(17) (9)
Included within administrative expenses
UK restructuring (20) –
Net pension gain 11 –
(9) –
Included within other income
Loss on disposal of properties – (3)
– (3)
Exceptional items before tax (26) (12)
Tax on exceptional items 1 7
Exceptional items (25) (5)
Following a sustained decline in trading, the Group undertook a detailed review in the year of its Irish operations and as a result
entered into an Examinership process in January 2013. The £21m restructuring charge represents provisions recorded for the
impairment of properties and estimated costs of exiting leases and other closure activities.
The UK restructuring net charge of £16m principally reflects the streamlining of B&Q UK & Ireland’s store support office and
kitchen, bathroom and bedroom business as well as IT services. It also includes a £4m release (2011/12: £2m) of an onerous
property contract provision for idle stores either sublet or exited in the period, which had previously been included as part of the
B&Q UK store closure and downsizing programme in 2005/06.
In the prior year the Group acquired 29 Focus stores in the UK and incurred £11m of costs integrating these into the B&Q
store network.
The net pension gain of £11m includes a £27m curtailment gain arising due to the closure of the UK final salary scheme to
future benefit accrual. Offsetting the gain is a charge of £16m for transitional payments to scheme members.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
74
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
6 Net finance costs
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Bank overdrafts and bank loans (8) (12)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (7) (10)
Finance leases (4) (5)
Financing fair value remeasurements 2 2
Unwinding of discount on provisions – (4)
Expected net interest charge on defined benefit pension schemes (3) –
Other interest payable – (3)
Capitalised interest 1 1
Finance costs (19) (31)
Cash and cash equivalents 15 19
Expected net interest return on defined benefit pension schemes – 2
Finance income 15 21
Net finance costs (4) (10)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt interest includes net interest income accrued on derivatives of £15m (2011/12:
£15m income) and amortisation of issue costs of borrowings of £1m (2011/12: £1m).
Capitalised interest relates to central borrowings and is calculated by applying a capitalisation rate of 1.6% (2011/12: 2.0%) to
expenditure on qualifying assets.
Financing fair value remeasurements comprise a net gain on derivatives, excluding accrued interest, of £10m (2011/12: £6m gain),
offset by a net loss from fair value adjustments to the carrying value of borrowings and cash of £8m (2011/12: £4m loss).
7 Profit before taxation
The following items of revenue have been credited in arriving at profit before taxation:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Sales 10,573 10,831
Other income 36 30
Finance income 15 21
Revenue 10,624 10,882
The following items of expense/(income) have been charged/(credited) in arriving at profit before taxation:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Operating lease rentals
Minimum lease payments – Property 435 411
Minimum lease payments – Equipment 35 37
Sublease income (17) (20)
453 428
Rental income received on investment property (6) (5)
Amortisation of other intangible assets
(1)
27 24
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and investment property
Owned assets 212 205
Under finance leases 9 8
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and investment property
(2)
8 7
Loss on disposal
Land and buildings and investment property – 3
Fixtures, fittings and equipment 4 3
Other intangible assets 1 1
Inventories: write down to net realisable value 16 14
Trade and other receivables: write down of bad and doubtful debts 4 4
(1) Of the amortisation of other intangible assets charge, £1m (2011/12: £3m) and £26m (2011/12: £21m) are included in selling and distribution expenses
and administrative expenses respectively.
(2) £7m of the 2012/13 charge relates to exceptional Ireland restructuring.
75
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
7 Profit before taxation continued
Auditors’ remuneration
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Fees payable for the audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements 0.3 0.2
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and their associates for other services to the Group:
The audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 1.3 1.2
Audit fees 1.6 1.4
Audit-related assurance services 0.1 0.1
Other taxation advisory services 0.1 0.1
Other assurance services 0.1 0.1
Other services 0.1 0.2
Non-audit fees 0.4 0.5
Auditors’ remuneration 2.0 1.9
Details of the Group’s policy on the use of auditors for non-audit services, the reasons why the auditor was used rather than another
supplier and how the auditor’s independence and objectivity was safeguarded are set out in the Audit Committee Report on page
41. No services were provided pursuant to contingent fee arrangements.
8 Employees and directors
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Wages and salaries 1,276 1,268
Social security costs 258 258
Post employment benefits
Defined contribution 17 8
Defined benefit (service cost only) 17 29
Share-based compensation 9 32
Employee benefit expenses 1,577 1,595
Number thousands 2012/13 2011/12
Stores 72 72
Administration 5 5
Average number of persons employed 77 77
The average number of persons employed excludes employees in the Group’s joint ventures and associates.
Remuneration of key management personnel
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Short term employee benefits 5.2 8.4
Post employment benefits 1.4 1.0
Share-based compensation 1.3 8.4
7.9 17.8
Key management consists of the Board of Directors and the Group Executive.
Further detail with respect to the Directors’ remuneration is set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. Other
than as set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report, there have been no transactions with key management during the year
(2011/12: £nil).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
76
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
9 Income tax expense
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
UK corporation tax
Current tax on profits for the year 47 68
Adjustments in respect of prior years (13) (16)
34 52
Overseas tax
Current tax on profits for the year 128 142
Adjustments in respect of prior years (54) (31)
74 111
Deferred tax
Current year 18 12
Adjustments in respect of prior years 5 (12)
Adjustments in respect of changes in tax rates (4) (5)
19 (5)
Income tax expense 127 158
Factors affecting tax charge for the year
The tax charge for the year differs from the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 24% (2011/12: 26%). The differences are
explained below:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Profit before taxation 691 797
Profit multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 24% (2011/12: 26%) 166 207
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates (5) (8)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 6 12
Temporary differences:
– Net gains on property (3) (6)
– Losses not recognised 11 3
Foreign tax rate differences 18 14
Adjustments in respect of prior years (62) (59)
Adjustments in respect of changes in tax rates (4) (5)
Income tax expense 127 158
The effective rate of tax on profit before exceptional items and excluding prior year tax adjustments and the impact of changes
in tax rates on deferred tax is 27% (2011/12: 28%). Tax on exceptional items for the year is a credit of £1m. In 2011/12 tax on
exceptional items was a credit of £7m, £5m of which related to prior year items. The effective tax rate calculation is set out in the
Financial Review on page 20.
The overall tax rate for the year is 18% (2011/12: 20%) reflecting the impact on deferred tax of the 2% fall in the UK rate, release
of prior year provisions either reassessed or time expired and a claim for the use of prior year losses of £33 million.
In addition to the amounts charged to the income statement, tax of £14m has been charged directly to equity (2011/12: £9m
charge), of which a £6m credit (2011/12: £33m credit) is included in current tax and a £20m charge (2011/12: £42m charge) is
included in deferred tax.
Kingfisher paid €138m tax to the French tax authorities in the year ended 31 January 2004 as a consequence of the Kesa
Electricals demerger and recorded this as an exceptional tax charge. Kingfisher appealed successfully against this tax liability and
as a result received €169m from the French tax authorities in September 2009, representing a refund of the €138m and €31m of
repayment supplement. The French tax authorities appealed this decision and the hearing took place in May 2011 with the Court
of Appeal finding in Kingfisher’s favour. The French tax authorities have appealed this decision to the final level of court although
a date for this hearing has not yet been set. Therefore no income has yet been recognised relating to this receipt.
77
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
9 Income tax expense continued
Impact of changes in tax rates
The UK corporation tax rate fell from 26% to 24% from 1 April 2012 and will fall to 23% from 1 April 2013. A further reduction
to 21% was announced in 2012, which is expected to take effect from 1 April 2014, and a subsequent reduction to 20% was
announced in 2013, which is expected to take effect from 1 April 2015. Since these further reductions have not yet been
substantively enacted, their impact is not included in these financial statements. The combined effect would be to reduce
the net deferred tax liability as reported at 2 February 2013 by £9m.
10 Earnings per share
2012/13 2011/12
Earnings
£ millions
Weighted
average
number of
shares
millions
Earnings
per share
pence
Earnings
£ millions
Weighted
average
number of
shares
millions
Earnings
per share
pence
Basic earnings per share 564 2,339 24.1 640 2,331 27.5
Dilutive share options 34 (0.3) 44 (0.6)
Diluted earnings per share 564 2,373 23.8 640 2,375 26.9
Basic earnings per share 564 2,339 24.1 640 2,331 27.5
Exceptional items 26 1.1 12 0.5
Tax on exceptional and prior year items (67) (2.8) (66) (2.8)
Financing fair value remeasurements (2) (0.1) (2) (0.1)
Tax on financing fair value remeasurements 1 – – –
Adjusted basic earnings per share 522 2,339 22.3 584 2,331 25.1
Diluted earnings per share 564 2,373 23.8 640 2,375 26.9
Exceptional items 26 1.1 12 0.5
Tax on exceptional and prior year items (67) (2.8) (66) (2.7)
Financing fair value remeasurements (2) (0.1) (2) (0.1)
Tax on financing fair value remeasurements 1 – – –
Adjusted diluted earnings per share 522 2,373 22.0 584 2,375 24.6
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the Company by the
weighted average number of shares in issue during the year, excluding those held in the Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust
(‘ESOP’) which for the purpose of this calculation are treated as cancelled.
For diluted earnings per share, the weighted average number of shares is adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential
ordinary shares. These represent share options granted to employees where both the exercise price is less than the average market
price of the Company’s shares during the year and any related performance conditions have been met.
11 Dividends
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Dividends to equity shareholders of the Company
Final dividend for the year ended 28 January 2012 of 6.37p per share (29 January 2011: 5.145p per share) 148 121
Interim dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 of 3.09p per share (28 January 2012: 2.47p per share) 73 57
221 178
The proposed final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 of 6.37p per share is subject to approval by shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting and has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
78
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
12 Goodwill
£ millions
Cost
At 29 January 2012 2,521
Exchange differences 3
At 2 February 2013 2,524
Impairment
At 29 January 2012 (124)
Exchange differences (1)
At 2 February 2013 (125)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 2,399
Cost
At 30 January 2011 2,512
Additions 2
Exchange differences 7
At 28 January 2012 2,521
Impairment
At 30 January 2011 (117)
Exchange differences (7)
At 28 January 2012 (124)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 2,397
Impairment tests for goodwill
Goodwill has been allocated for impairment testing purposes to groups of cash generating units (‘CGUs’) as follows:
£ millions UK France Poland China Total
At 2 February 2013
Cost 1,798 520 81 125 2,524
Impairment – – – (125) (125)
Net carrying amount 1,798 520 81 – 2,399
At 28 January 2012
Cost 1,798 518 81 124 2,521
Impairment – – – (124) (124)
Net carrying amount 1,798 518 81 – 2,397
The recoverable amounts of these groups of CGUs have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. The groups of CGUs
for which the carrying amount of goodwill is deemed significant are the UK, France and Poland.
The Board have reviewed a sensitivity analysis, including the use of prior year discount and growth rates, and do not consider that
a reasonably possible change in the assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations would cause the carrying amounts of the
CGUs to exceed their recoverable amounts. The key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations are set out below.
Assumptions
• The cash flow projections are based on approved financial budgets and strategic plans covering a four year period. These are
based on both past performance and expectations for future market development.
• Key drivers in the plans are like-for-like (‘LFL’) sales, margin and operating profit percentage. LFL sales are based on the Group’s
market expectations and the CGUs’ market shares.
• Cash flows beyond this four year period are calculated using a growth rate which does not exceed the long term average growth
rate for retail businesses operating in the same countries as the CGUs.
• The weighted average cost of capital, used to discount future cash flows, is calculated using a combination of the cost of debt,
leases and equity, weighted according to an estimate of the CGU’s capital gearing. A risk adjustment is also made for the country
in which the CGU operates.
79
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
12 Goodwill continued
UK
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 8.9% (2011/12: 10.5%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the UK market.
• The long term growth rate is 2.8% (2011/12: 1.9%).
France
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 9.6% (2011/12: 13.3%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the French market.
• The long term growth rate is 2.3% (2011/12: 1.9%).
Poland
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 10.5% (2011/12: 14.7%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the Polish market.
• The long term growth rate is 3.5% (2011/12: 1.9%).
13 Other intangible assets
£ millions
Computer
software Other Total
Cost
At 29 January 2012 343 9 352
Additions 72 – 72
Disposals (3) – (3)
Exchange differences 2 – 2
At 2 February 2013 414 9 423
Amortisation
At 29 January 2012 (226) (3) (229)
Charge for the year (26) (1) (27)
Disposals 1 – 1
Exchange differences (2) – (2)
At 2 February 2013 (253) (4) (257)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 161 5 166
Cost
At 30 January 2011 293 13 306
Additions 61 – 61
Disposals (10) (4) (14)
Exchange differences (1) – (1)
At 28 January 2012 343 9 352
Amortisation
At 30 January 2011 (213) (7) (220)
Charge for the year (23) (1) (24)
Disposals 9 4 13
Exchange differences 1 1 2
At 28 January 2012 (226) (3) (229)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 117 6 123
None of the Group’s other intangible assets have indefinite useful lives.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
80
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
14 Property, plant and equipment
£ millions
Land and
buildings
Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment Total
Cost
At 29 January 2012 3,049 2,375 5,424
Additions 88 171 259
Disposals (19) (42) (61)
Transfers to investment property (12) – (12)
Exchange differences 74 36 110
At 2 February 2013 3,180 2,540 5,720
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (345) (1,412) (1,757)
Charge for the year (46) (174) (220)
Impairment losses (1) (7) (8)
Disposals 5 37 42
Exchange differences (9) (20) (29)
At 2 February 2013 (396) (1,576) (1,972)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 2,784 964 3,748
Cost
At 30 January 2011 2,989 2,246 5,235
Additions 167 206 373
Disposals (13) (50) (63)
Transfers to investment property (25) – (25)
Exchange differences (69) (27) (96)
At 28 January 2012 3,049 2,375 5,424
Depreciation
At 30 January 2011 (309) (1,294) (1,603)
Charge for the year (43) (169) (212)
Impairment losses (4) (3) (7)
Disposals 8 45 53
Exchange differences 3 9 12
At 28 January 2012 (345) (1,412) (1,757)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 2,704 963 3,667
Assets in the course of construction included above at net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 81 46 127
At 28 January 2012 49 64 113
Assets held under finance leases included above at net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 19 34 53
At 28 January 2012 20 29 49
The amount of borrowing costs capitalised in property, plant and equipment in the year has been £1m (2011/12: £1m).
The cumulative total of borrowing costs included at the balance sheet date, net of depreciation, is £27m (2011/12: £26m).
81
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
14 Property, plant and equipment continued
Land and buildings are analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Freehold
Long
leasehold
Short
leasehold Total Total
Cost 2,443 136 601 3,180 3,049
Depreciation (139) (6) (251) (396) (345)
Net carrying amount 2,304 130 350 2,784 2,704
Properties that were held at 1 February 2004 are carried at deemed cost, being the fair value of land and buildings as at the
transition date to IFRS. Fair value is taken to be the open market value at the date of valuation. All property acquired after
1 February 2004 is carried at cost.
Included in land and buildings is leasehold land that is in effect a prepayment for the use of land and is accordingly being
amortised on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The net carrying amount of leasehold land included
in land and buildings at 2 February 2013 is £240m (2011/12: £237m).
The Group does not revalue properties within its financial statements. A valuation exercise is performed for internal purposes
annually in November by independent external valuers covering over one third of the property portfolio with the remaining portfolio
valued internally. Based on this exercise the value of property is £3.5 billion (2011/12: £3.4bn). The key assumption used in
calculating this is the estimated yields.
15 Investment property
£ millions
Cost
At 29 January 2012 67
Additions 3
Transfers from property, plant and equipment 12
Exchange differences (3)
At 2 February 2013 79
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (12)
Charge for the year (1)
At 2 February 2013 (13)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 66
Cost
At 30 January 2011 44
Additions 9
Disposals (9)
Transfers from property, plant and equipment 25
Exchange differences (2)
At 28 January 2012 67
Depreciation
At 30 January 2011 (12)
Charge for the year (1)
Exchange differences 1
At 28 January 2012 (12)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 55
A property valuation exercise is performed for internal purposes annually as described in note 14. Based on this exercise the fair
value of investment property is £121m (2011/12: £90m).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
82
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
16 Subsidiaries
A list of the significant investments in subsidiaries, including the name, country of incorporation and proportion of ownership
interest is given in note 4 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
17 Investments in joint ventures and associates
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 271
Share of post-tax results 20
Dividends (10)
Exchange differences 8
At 2 February 2013 289
At 30 January 2011 259
Share of post-tax results 32
Dividends (10)
Exchange differences (10)
At 28 January 2012 271
No goodwill is included in the carrying amount of investments in joint ventures and associates (2011/12: £nil).
Details of the significant joint ventures and associates are shown below:
Country of
incorporation % interest held
Class of
shares owned Main activity
Principal joint ventures
Koçtas¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S.
(1)
Turkey 50% Ordinary Retailing
Principal associates
Hornbach Holding A.G.
(2)
Germany 21% Ordinary &
preference
Retailing
Crealfi S.A. France 49% Ordinary Finance
(1) Owing to local conditions, this company prepares its financial statements to 31 December.
(2) This company prepares its financial statements to 28 February (or 29 February in a leap year). In order to avoid undue delay in the presentation of the
Group financial statements, the Group records its share of post-tax results for the year ended 30 November. The value of the Group’s investment based on
published price quotations at 2 February 2013 was £195m (2011/12: £178m).
Aggregate amounts relating to joint ventures and associates:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Joint ventures Associates Total Joint ventures Associates Total
Non-current assets 28 269 297 29 249 278
Current assets 56 303 359 59 296 355
Current liabilities (47) (211) (258) (54) (195) (249)
Non-current liabilities (8) (101) (109) (2) (111) (113)
Share of net assets 29 260 289 32 239 271
Sales 165 605 770 166 608 774
Operating expenses (156) (576) (732) (152) (570) (722)
Operating profit 9 29 38 14 38 52
Net finance costs (3) (7) (10) (2) (7) (9)
Profit before taxation 6 22 28 12 31 43
Income tax expense (1) (7) (8) (2) (9) (11)
Share of post-tax results 5 15 20 10 22 32
83
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
18 Inventories
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Finished goods for resale 2,083 1,844
The cost of inventories recognised as an expense and included in cost of sales for the year ended 2 February 2013 is £6,093m
(2011/12: £6,304m).
19 Trade and other receivables
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Non-current
Prepayments 13 13
Property receivables 2 2
Other receivables 3 2
18 17
Current
Trade receivables 50 61
Provision for bad and doubtful debts (11) (12)
Net trade receivables 39 49
Property receivables 3 3
Prepayments 135 141
Other receivables 368 338
545 531
Trade and other receivables 563 548
Other receivables principally comprise rebates due from suppliers.
The fair values of trade and other receivables approximate to their carrying amounts. Refer to note 24 for information on the credit
risk associated with trade and other receivables.
20 Cash and cash equivalents
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Cash at bank and in hand 268 271
Short term deposits 130 316
398 587
Short term deposits comprise bank deposits and investments in money market funds, fixed for periods of up to three months.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents approximate to their carrying amounts.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
84
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
21 Trade and other payables
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Current
Trade payables 1,370 1,256
Other taxation and social security 227 229
Deferred income 168 153
Accruals and other payables 665 718
2,430 2,356
Non-current
Accruals and other payables 115 121
Trade and other payables 2,545 2,477
Accruals include allowance for customer returns, representing the estimate of future sales returns at the year end.
The fair values of trade and other payables approximate to their carrying amounts.
22 Borrowings
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Current
Bank overdrafts – 102
Bank loans 54 82
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 32 172
Finance leases 13 11
99 367
Non-current
Bank loans 14 16
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 306
Finance leases 52 53
332 375
Borrowings 431 742
Bank overdrafts and loans
Bank overdrafts are repayable on demand and current bank loans mature within the next 12 months. Bank overdrafts are arranged
at floating rates of interest. Current bank loans include Chinese Renminbi loans drawn under committed facilities expiring in 2013.
These loans bear interest based on the People’s Bank of China reference rate and are fixed for periods of up to six months. At the
year end the effective borrowing rate on the drawn amounts was 6.2% (2011/12: 6.2%). Other current bank loans are arranged at
floating rates of interest.
Non-current bank loans have an average maturity of three years (2011/12: three years) and are arranged at fixed rates of interest
with an effective interest rate of 3.8% (2011/12: 3.6%).
85
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
22 Borrowings continued
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt
Medium Term Notes (‘MTNs’) were issued in prior years under the Group’s €2,500m MTN programme and further notes issued as
a US Private Placement (‘USPP’).
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Principal
outstanding Maturity date Coupon
Effective
interest rate
Carrying
amount
Carrying
amount
Euro MTN €nil 23/11/12
(1)
4.13% 4.3% – 172
US Dollar USPP $50m 24/05/13
(2)
6.14% 6.1% 32 34
Sterling MTN £73m 15/12/14
(3)
5.63% 5.8% 78 80
US Dollar USPP $68m 24/05/16
(2)
6.30% 6.3% 49 51
US Dollar USPP $179m 24/05/18
(2)
6.40% 6.4% 139 141
298 478
(1) Swapped to floating rate Euro based on 3 month EURIBOR plus a margin using an interest rate swap. Repaid on 23/11/2012 upon maturity.
(2) $297m swapped to floating rate Sterling based on 6 month LIBOR plus a margin using a cross-currency interest rate swap.
(3) Swapped to floating rate Euro based on 3 month EURIBOR plus a margin using a cross-currency interest rate swap.
The Group values its MTNs and USPP on an amortised cost basis, adjusted for fair value gains and losses (based on observable
market inputs) attributable to the risk being hedged in designated and effective fair value hedge relationships.
The carrying amounts of the MTNs and USPP have been impacted both by exchange rate movements and fair value adjustments
for interest rate risk. At 2 February 2013, the cumulative effect of interest rate fair value adjustments is to increase the Group’s
MTNs and USPP carrying amounts by £38m (2011/12: £49m increase).
The USPP contains a covenant requiring that, as at the end of each semi-annual and annual financial reporting period, the ratio of
operating profit to net interest payable, excluding exceptional items, should not be less than 3 to 1 for the preceding 12 month
period. The Group has complied with this covenant for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Finance leases
The Group leases certain of its buildings and fixtures and equipment under finance leases. The average lease term maturity for
buildings is seven years (2011/12: seven years) and for fixtures and equipment is two years (2011/12: two years). Certain building
leases include a clause to enable upward revision of the rental charge to prevailing market conditions.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases, together with the present value of minimum lease payments, are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Present value
of payments
Minimum
payments
Present value
of payments
Minimum
payments
Less than one year 13 15 11 14
One to five years 30 42 29 39
More than five years 22 31 24 35
Total 65 88 64 88
Less amounts representing finance charges (23) (24)
Present value of minimum lease payments 65 64
The interest rates inherent in the finance leases are fixed at the contract date for the lease term. The weighted average effective
interest rate on the Group’s finance leases is 8.5% (2011/12: 8.4%).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
86
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
22 Borrowings continued
Fair value of borrowings
The fair values of current borrowings approximate to their carrying amounts.
Where available, market values have been used to determine the fair values of non-current borrowings. Where market values are
not available or are not reliable, fair values have been calculated by discounting cash flows at prevailing interest and foreign
exchange rates. The carrying amounts and fair values of non-current borrowings are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Carrying
amount Fair value
Carrying
amount Fair value
Bank loans 14 12 16 16
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 274 306 314
Finance leases 52 82 53 84
332 368 375 414
Assets worth RMB 1.6bn (£163m) secure a bank facility in China, which matures in July 2013 (2011/12: RMB 1.6bn).
23 Derivatives
The net fair value of derivatives by hedge designation at the balance sheet date is:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Fair value hedges 69 64
Cash flow hedges (14) 9
Net investment hedges (18) –
Non-designated hedges 22 5
59 78
Non-current assets 55 66
Current assets 33 26
Current liabilities (17) (6)
Non-current liabilities (12) (8)
59 78
The fair values are calculated by discounting future cash flows arising from the instruments and adjusting for credit risk. These fair
value measurements are all made using observable market rates of interest, foreign exchange and credit risk and are therefore
classified as ‘level 2’ in the IFRS 7, ‘Financial instruments: Disclosures’, fair value hierarchy. At 2 February 2013 net derivative
assets included in net debt amount to £71m (2011/12: £67m net derivative assets).
Fair value hedges
Fair value hedges comprise interest rate swap contracts that convert fixed rate debt issued under the Group’s Medium Term Note
programme and the US Private Placement to floating rate liabilities, along with certain cross-currency swaps. At 2 February 2013
the Sterling equivalent amount of such contracts is £261m (2011/12: £516m). During the year, interest rate swaps have expired to
coincide with the final repayment of underlying debt. The Sterling equivalent amount of those expired swaps (at year end exchange
rates) was £174m.
Cash flow hedges
Forward foreign exchange contracts hedge currency exposures of forecast inventory purchases. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling
equivalent amount of such contracts is £441m (2011/12: £376m). The associated fair value gains and losses will be transferred to
inventories when the purchases occur during the next 12 months. Gains of £8m (2011/12: £8m losses) have been transferred to
inventories for contracts which matured during the year.
Net investment hedges
Cross-currency interest rate swaps hedge currency exposures of overseas investments. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling equivalent
amount of such contracts is £90m (2011/12: £nil).
Non-designated hedges
The Group has entered into certain derivatives to provide a hedge against fluctuations in the income statement arising from balance
sheet positions. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling equivalent amount of such contracts is £1,062m (2011/12: £715m). These have
not been accounted for as hedges, since the fair value movements of the derivatives in the income statement offset the retranslation
of the balance sheet positions. These include short term foreign exchange contracts.
The Group has reviewed all significant contracts for embedded derivatives and none of these contracts has any embedded
derivatives which are not closely related to the host contract and therefore the Group is not required to account for these separately.
87
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
24 Financial risk management
Kingfisher’s treasury function has primary responsibility for managing certain financial risks to which the Group is exposed. The
Board reviews the levels of exposure regularly and approves treasury policies covering the use of financial instruments required
to manage these risks. Kingfisher’s treasury function is not run as a profit centre and does not enter into any transactions for
speculative purposes.
In the normal course of business the Group uses financial instruments including derivatives. The main types of financial
instruments used are Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt, bank loans and deposits, money market funds, interest
rate swaps, commodity swaps and foreign exchange contracts.
Interest rate risk
Borrowings arranged at floating rates of interest expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk, whereas those arranged at fixed
rates of interest expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The Group manages its interest rate risk by entering into certain
interest rate derivative contracts which modify the interest rate payable on the Group’s underlying debt instruments, principally
the Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt.
Currency risk
The Group’s principal currency exposures are to the Euro, US Dollar, Polish Zloty and Chinese Renminbi. The Euro, Polish Zloty
and Chinese Renminbi exposures are operational and arise through the ownership of retail businesses in France, Spain, Ireland,
Poland and China. In particular, the Group generates a substantial part of its profit from the Eurozone, and as such is exposed
to the economic uncertainty of its member states. The Group continues to monitor potential exposures and risks, and develop
effective risk management solutions.
Balance sheet Euro translation exposure is currently hedged by maintaining a proportion of the Group’s debt in Euro, whilst
Chinese Renminbi balance sheet translation exposure is partly hedged by local debt in China. It is the Group’s policy not to
hedge the translation of overseas earnings into Sterling. In addition, the Group has significant transactional exposure arising on
the purchase of inventories denominated in US Dollars, which it hedges using forward foreign exchange contracts. Under Group
policies, the Group companies are required to hedge committed inventory purchases and a proportion of forecast inventory
purchases arising in the next 12 months, and this is monitored on an ongoing basis.
Kingfisher’s policy is to manage the interest rate and currency profile of its issued debt using derivative contracts. The effect of these
contracts on the Group’s net debt/cash is as follows:
Sterling Euro US Dollar Other
£ millions Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Total
At 2 February 2013
Net cash before fair value
adjustments and financing derivatives (114) 91 (39) 135 (188) 3 103 14 5
Fair value adjustments to net cash (6) – – – (32) – – – (38)
Financing derivatives 78 (1,064) – 192 222 315 – 328 71
Net cash (42) (973) (39) 327 2 318 103 342 38
At 28 January 2012
Net debt before fair value
adjustments and financing derivatives (134) 7 (183) 290 (189) 2 90 11 (106)
Fair value adjustments to net debt (8) – (3) – (38) – – – (49)
Financing derivatives 81 (892) 171 (97) 293 262 – 249 67
Net debt (61) (885) (15) 193 66 264 90 260 (88)
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
88
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
24 Financial risk management continued
Financial instruments principally affected by interest rate and currency risks, being the significant market risks impacting Kingfisher,
are borrowings, deposits and derivatives. The following analysis illustrates the sensitivity of net finance costs (reflecting the impact
on profit) and derivative cash flow hedges (reflecting the impact on other comprehensive income) to changes in interest rates and
foreign exchange rates.
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Net finance
costs
Income/
(costs)
Net finance
costs
Income/
(costs)
Effect of 1% rise in interest rates on net finance costs
Sterling (10) (9)
Euro 3 2
US Dollar 3 3
Polish Zloty 3 2
Chinese Renminbi – –
Due to the Group’s hedging arrangements and offsetting foreign currency assets and liabilities, there is no significant impact on
profit from the retranslation of financial instruments.
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Derivative
cash flow
hedges
Increase/
(decrease)
Derivative
cash flow
hedges
Increase/
(decrease)
Effect of 10% appreciation in foreign exchange rates on derivative cash flow hedges
US Dollar against Sterling 18 17
US Dollar against Euro 21 15
The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash flow hedges results from retranslation of forward purchases of US Dollars
used to hedge forecast US Dollar purchases of inventories. The associated fair value gains and losses are deferred in equity until
the purchases occur. See note 23 for further details. The retranslation of foreign currency borrowings and derivatives designated as
hedges of net investments in foreign operations is reported in equity and offset by the retranslation of the hedged net investments.
The sensitivity analysis excludes the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying amount of trade and other payables
and receivables, due to the low associated sensitivity, and are before the effect of tax. It has been prepared on the basis that the
Group’s debt, hedging activities, hedge accounting designations, and foreign currency proportion of debt and derivative contracts
remain constant, reflecting the positions at 2 February 2013 and 28 January 2012 respectively. As a consequence, the analysis
relates to the position at those dates and is not necessarily representative of the years then ended. In preparing the sensitivity
analysis it is assumed that all hedges are fully effective.
The effects shown above would be reversed in the event of an equal and opposite change in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
89
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
24 Financial risk management continued
Liquidity risk
The Group regularly reviews the level of cash and debt facilities required to fund its activities. This involves preparing a prudent cash
flow forecast for the next three years, determining the level of debt facilities required to fund the business, planning for repayments
of debt at its maturity and identifying an appropriate amount of headroom to provide a reserve against unexpected outflows.
The following table analyses the Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities and derivative assets and liabilities into relevant maturity
groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. It excludes trade and other
payables due to the low associated liquidity risk. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows
(including interest) and as such may differ from the amounts disclosed on the balance sheet.
£ millions
Less than
1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years
More than
5 years Total
At 2 February 2013
Bank loans (55) (4) (2) (4) (5) – (70)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (47) (87) (10) (52) (7) (117) (320)
Finance leases (15) (16) (12) (8) (6) (31) (88)
Derivatives – receipts 47 87 10 52 7 117 320
Derivatives – payments (30) (93) (2) (39) (2) (98) (264)
At 28 January 2012
Bank overdrafts (102) – – – – – (102)
Bank loans (85) (6) (4) (2) (4) – (101)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (191) (47) (87) (10) (52) (125) (512)
Finance leases (14) (13) (11) (9) (6) (35) (88)
Derivatives – receipts 23 47 87 10 52 125 344
Derivatives – payments (7) (31) (90) (3) (39) (101) (271)
At 2 February 2013 the Group has an undrawn revolving facility of £200m which matures in August 2016. The £200m facility
contains a covenant requiring that, as at the end of each annual and semi-annual financial reporting period, the ratio of operating
profit to net interest payable, excluding exceptional items, should not be less than 3 to 1 for the preceding 12 month period. The
Group has complied with this covenant for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Credit risk
The Group deposits surplus cash with a number of banks with the strongest short term credit ratings and with money market funds
which have AAA credit ratings and offer same day liquidity. A credit limit for each counterparty is agreed by the Board covering the
full value of deposits and a proportion of the fair value of derivative contracts. The credit risk is reduced further by spreading the
investments and derivative contracts across several counterparties. At 2 February 2013, the highest cash deposit with a single
counterparty was £32m (2011/12: £63m).
The Group’s exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of cash at bank and short term deposits and the fair
value of derivative assets.
No further credit risk provision is required in excess of the normal provision for bad and doubtful debts as the Group has a low
concentration of credit risk in respect of trade receivables. Concentration of risk is limited as a result of low individual balances with
short maturity spread across a large number of unrelated customers.
At 2 February 2013, trade and other receivables that are past due but not provided against amount to £41m (2011/12: £62m),
of which £3m (2011/12: £3m) are over 120 days past due.
Refer also to note 35 for details on guarantees provided by the Group.
Capital risk
Capital risk management disclosures are provided in the Financial review on page 24.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
90
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
25 Deferred tax
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Deferred tax assets 17 23
Deferred tax liabilities (303) (269)
(286) (246)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against each other when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax jurisdiction
and when the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
£ millions
Accelerated
tax
depreciation
Gains on
property Provisions Tax losses
Post
employment
benefits Other Total
At 29 January 2012 (115) (144) 33 7 (30) 3 (246)
(Charge)/credit to income statement (17) 14 (15) 1 (2) – (19)
(Charge)/credit to equity – – – – (27) 7 (20)
Exchange differences (4) (2) 2 – 2 1 (1)
At 2 February 2013 (136) (132) 20 8 (57) 11 (286)
At 30 January 2011 (98) (161) 27 2 11 8 (211)
(Charge)/credit to income statement (22) 16 8 6 (4) 1 5
Charge to equity – – – – (36) (6) (42)
Exchange differences 5 1 (2) (1) (1) – 2
At 28 January 2012 (115) (144) 33 7 (30) 3 (246)
At the balance sheet date, the Group has unused tax losses of £243m (2011/12: £246m) available for offset against future profits.
A deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of £24m (2011/12: £23m) of such losses. No deferred tax asset has been
recognised in respect of the remaining £219m (2011/12: £223m) due to the unpredictability of future profit streams. Included in
unrecognised tax losses are tax losses arising in China of £187m (2011/12: £210m) which can be carried forward only in the next
one to five years. Other unrecognised losses may be carried forward indefinitely.
No deferred tax liability is recognised on temporary differences of £2,980m (2011/12: £114m) relating to the unremitted earnings of
overseas subsidiaries and joint ventures. This is because the earnings are continually reinvested by the Group and therefore no tax
is expected to be payable on them in the foreseeable future. The total temporary difference has increased significantly in the period
largely as a result of changes introduced by the French government to apply a surtax on gross dividend distributions paid by French
entities. Previously only 5% of dividend income received in France was potentially subject to tax at the prevailing corporate income
tax rate. Hence as a result of the surtax the total earnings on which the tax would be chargeable, should they be remitted from or
through France, has increased considerably.
26 Provisions
£ millions
Onerous
property
contracts Restructuring Total
At 29 January 2012 21 38 59
Charge to income statement 2 50 52
Credit to income statement – (4) (4)
Utilised in the year (2) (32) (34)
At 2 February 2013 21 52 73
Current liabilities 4 31 35
Non-current liabilities 17 21 38
21 52 73
Within the onerous property contracts provisions, Kingfisher has provided against future liabilities for all properties sublet at a
shortfall and long term idle properties, except those related to restructuring programmes which are included in the restructuring
provisions. The provisions are based on the present value of future cash outflows relating to rent, rates and service charges.
Restructuring provisions include the estimated costs of the UK, Ireland and China restructuring programmes. The provisions have
been discounted to reflect the time value of money and the risks associated with the specific liabilities.
The ultimate costs and timing of cash flows related to the above provisions are largely dependent on exiting the property lease
contracts and subletting surplus space.
91
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
27 Post employment benefits
The Group operates a variety of post employment benefit arrangements covering both funded and unfunded defined benefit
schemes and funded defined contribution schemes. The most significant are the funded, final salary defined benefit and defined
contribution schemes for the Group’s UK employees. Various defined benefit and defined contribution schemes are operated in
France and Poland, where they are principally retirement indemnity in nature, and in China. The overseas schemes are not material
in relation to the Group as a whole.
Defined contribution schemes
Pension costs for defined contribution schemes, at rates specified in the individual schemes’ rules, are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Charge to operating profit 17 8
From July 2012 an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered to all UK employees. Eligible UK employees will be
automatically enrolled into the defined contribution scheme from 31 March 2013.
Defined benefit schemes
The Group’s principal defined benefit pension scheme is in the UK. The assets of this scheme are held separately from the Group
in trustee-administered funds. The Trustees are required to act in the best interests of the scheme’s beneficiaries.
A full actuarial valuation of the scheme is carried out every three years by an independent actuary for the scheme Trustee and the
last full valuation was carried out as at 31 March 2010. The Company monitors the scheme funding level on a regular basis and will
review with the scheme Trustee at future valuations the continued appropriateness of the repayment schedule currently in place.
During the year, and following consultation with the active members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed to future
benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012. The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. The closure to future accrual
resulted in an exceptional non-cash curtailment gain of £27m, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities as benefits
are no longer linked to future salary increases other than in line with inflation.
UK scheme interest in property partnership
In 2010/11, the Group established a partnership, Kingfisher Scottish Limited Partnership (‘Kingfisher SLP’), as part of an
arrangement with the UK scheme Trustee to address an element of the scheme deficit and provide greater security to the Trustee.
The partnership interests are held by the Group and by the scheme, the latter resulting from investments of £78m and £106m
made by the Trustee in January and June 2011 respectively. These investments followed Group contributions of the same amounts
into the scheme. Under IAS 19, ‘Employee benefits’, the investments held by the scheme in Kingfisher SLP do not represent plan
assets for the purposes of the Group’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly the reported pension position does not reflect
these investments. The Group has control over the partnership and therefore it is consolidated in these Group financial statements.
Accordingly, advantage has been taken of the exemptions provided by Regulation 7 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations
2008 from the requirements for preparation, delivery and publication of the partnership’s accounts.
UK property assets with market values of £83m and £119m were transferred, in January 2011 and June 2011 respectively, into
the partnership and leased back to B&Q plc. The Group retains control over these properties, including the flexibility to substitute
alternative properties. The Trustee has a first charge over the properties in the event that Kingfisher plc becomes insolvent. The
scheme’s partnership interest entitles it to the majority of the income of the partnership over the 20 year period of the arrangement.
The payments to the scheme by Kingfisher SLP over this term are reflected as Group pension contributions on a cash basis. At the
end of this term, Kingfisher plc has the option to acquire the Trustee’s partnership interest in Kingfisher SLP.
Income statement
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Amounts charged/(credited) to operating profit
Current service cost 13 4 17 24 5 29
Exceptional curtailment gain (27) – (27) – – –
(14) 4 (10) 24 5 29
Amounts charged/(credited) to net finance costs
Interest on defined benefit obligations 84 3 87 90 3 93
Expected return on pension scheme assets (83) (1) (84) (94) (1) (95)
1 2 3 (4) 2 (2)
Total (credited)/charged to income statement (13) 6 (7) 20 7 27
Of the net credit to operating profit, a £12m charge (2011/12: £22m charge) and £22m credit (2011/12: £7m charge) are included
in selling and distribution expenses and administrative expenses respectively. Actuarial gains and losses have been reported in the
statement of comprehensive income.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
92
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
27 Post employment benefits continued
Balance sheet
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Present value of defined benefit obligations (1,994) (93) (2,087) (1,902) (60) (1,962)
Fair value of scheme assets 2,065 22 2,087 1,927 20 1,947
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme 71 (71) – 25 (40) (15)
The amount of the defined benefit obligation at 2 February 2013 which relates to funded defined benefit schemes is £2,087m
(2011/12: £1,962m).
Movements in the surplus or deficit are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme at beginning of year 25 (40) (15) (21) (37) (58)
Current service cost (13) (4) (17) (24) (5) (29)
Exceptional curtailment gain 27 – 27 – – –
Interest on defined benefit obligations (84) (3) (87) (90) (3) (93)
Expected return on pension scheme assets 83 1 84 94 1 95
Actuarial (losses)/gains (7) (22) (29) 18 2 20
Contributions paid by employer 40 1 41 48 1 49
Exchange differences – (4) (4) – 1 1
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme at end of year 71 (71) – 25 (40) (15)
Movements in the present value of defined benefit obligations are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Present value of defined benefit obligations at beginning of year (1,902) (60) (1,962) (1,646) (57) (1,703)
Current service cost (13) (4) (17) (24) (5) (29)
Exceptional curtailment gain 27 – 27 – – –
Interest on defined benefit obligations (84) (3) (87) (90) (3) (93)
Actuarial (losses)/gains (80) (22) (102) (197) 2 (195)
Contributions paid by employees (5) – (5) (7) – (7)
Benefits paid 63 1 64 62 1 63
Exchange differences – (5) (5) – 2 2
Present value of defined benefit obligations at end of year (1,994) (93) (2,087) (1,902) (60) (1,962)
Movements in the fair value of scheme assets are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Fair value of scheme assets at beginning of year 1,927 20 1,947 1,625 20 1,645
Expected return on pension scheme assets 83 1 84 94 1 95
Actuarial gains on pension scheme assets 73 – 73 215 – 215
Contributions paid by employer 40 1 41 48 1 49
Contributions paid by employees 5 – 5 7 – 7
Benefits paid (63) (1) (64) (62) (1) (63)
Exchange differences – 1 1 – (1) (1)
Fair value of scheme assets at end of year 2,065 22 2,087 1,927 20 1,947
The fair value of scheme assets is analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total % of total UK Other Total % of total
Equities 552 – 552 26% 486 – 486 25%
Bonds 1,367 – 1,367 66% 1,298 – 1,298 67%
Property 70 – 70 3% 87 – 87 4%
Other 76 22 98 5% 56 20 76 4%
Total fair value of scheme assets 2,065 22 2,087 100% 1,927 20 1,947 100%
93
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
27 Post employment benefits continued
The actual return on pension scheme assets is as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Actual return on pension scheme assets 156 1 157 309 1 310
The estimated amount of total contributions to be paid to the UK and overseas pension schemes by the Group during the next
financial year is £32m.
Amounts for the current and previous four years
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09
Present value of defined benefit obligations (2,087) (1,962) (1,703) (1,716) (1,437)
Fair value of scheme assets 2,087 1,947 1,645 1,518 1,363
Deficit in scheme – (15) (58) (198) (74)
Changes in assumptions underlying present value of defined benefit
obligations (98) (195) 40 (226) 21
Percentage of defined benefit obligations 5% 10% (2%) 13% (1%)
Experience (losses)/gains arising on defined benefit obligations (4) – 34 – (1)
Percentage of defined benefit obligations – – (2%) – –
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets 73 215 54 61 (211)
Percentage of scheme assets 3% 11% 3% 4% (15%)
Total (losses)/gains recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in
the year (29) 20 128 (165) (191)
Cumulative losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income (220) (191)
Principal actuarial valuation assumptions
The assumptions used in calculating the costs and obligations of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes are set by the
Directors after consultation with independent professionally qualified actuaries. The assumptions are based on the conditions at
the time and changes in these assumptions can lead to significant movements in the estimated obligations, as illustrated in the
sensitivity analysis.
The UK scheme discount rate is based on the yield on the iBoxx over 15 year AA-rated Sterling corporate bond index adjusted for
the difference in term between iBoxx and scheme liabilities. The overall expected rate of return on scheme assets reflects market
expectations at the valuation date of long term asset returns and the mix of assets in the schemes.
2012/13 2011/12
Annual % rate UK Other UK Other
Discount rate 4.6 2.8 4.5 4.6
Salary escalation n/a 2.0 to 6.7 3.8 2.0 to 6.7
Rate of pension increases 3.3 – 3.0 –
Price inflation 3.3 2.0 3.0 2.0
2012/13 2011/12
% rate of return UK Other UK Other
Equities 7.6 – 7.6 –
Bonds 3.5 – 3.4 –
Property 5.9 – 5.8 –
Other 2.4 3.5 2.6 3.5
Overall expected rate of return 4.6 3.5 4.5 3.5
For the UK scheme, the mortality assumptions used in the actuarial valuations have been selected with regard to the characteristics
and experience of the membership of the scheme from 2007 to 2010. The base mortality assumptions have been derived by
adjusting standard mortality tables (SAPS tables) projected forward to 2010 with the medium cohort improvement factors for
males and with the standard improvement factors for females. In addition, allowance has been made for future increases in life
expectancy. For males, the allowance is in line with medium cohort improvements subject to a minimum rate of improvement of
1% pa, and for females, the allowance is in line with the average of the standard series and long cohort improvements, subject to a
minimum of 1% pa. These improvements take into account trends observed within the scheme over the past decade and general
population trends.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
94
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
27 Post employment benefits continued
The assumptions for life expectancy of UK scheme members are as follows:
Years 2012/13 2011/12
Age to which current pensioners are expected to live (60 now)
– Male 86.4 86.4
– Female 87.1 87.1
Age to which future pensioners are expected to live (60 in 15 years’ time)
– Male 87.1 87.1
– Female 88.7 88.7
The following sensitivity analysis for the UK scheme shows the estimated impact on obligations resulting from changes to key
actuarial assumptions, whilst holding all other assumptions constant.
Assumption Change in assumption Impact on defined benefit obligation
Discount rate Increase/decrease by 0.1% Decrease/increase by £38m
Rate of pension increases Increase/decrease by 0.1% Increase/decrease by £25m
Price inflation Increase/decrease by 0.1% Increase/decrease by £38m
Mortality Increase in life expectancy by one year Increase by £62m
28 Share capital
Number of
ordinary
shares
millions
Ordinary
share capital
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 2,369 372
New shares issued under share schemes 3 1
At 2 February 2013 2,372 373
At 30 January 2011 2,364 371
New shares issued under share schemes 5 1
At 28 January 2012 2,369 372
29 Other reserves
£ millions
Cash flow
hedge reserve
Translation
reserve Other Total
At 29 January 2012 7 247 159 413
Currency translation differences
Group – 122 – 122
Joint ventures and associates – 8 – 8
Cash flow hedges
Fair value losses (14) – – (14)
Gains transferred to inventories (8) – – (8)
Tax on other comprehensive income 7 (3) – 4
Other comprehensive income for the year (15) 127 – 112
At 2 February 2013 (8) 374 159 525
At 30 January 2011 (5) 385 159 539
Currency translation differences
Group – (129) – (129)
Joint ventures and associates – (10) – (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value gains 10 – – 10
Losses transferred to inventories 8 – – 8
Tax on other comprehensive income (6) 1 – (5)
Other comprehensive income for the year 12 (138) – (126)
At 28 January 2012 7 247 159 413
The ‘other’ category of reserve represents the premium on the issue of convertible loan stock in 1993 and the merger reserve
relating to the acquisition of Darty in 1993.
95
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
30 Share-based payments
2012/13 2011/12
Options
Number
Weighted
average exercise
price
£
Options
Number
Weighted
average exercise
price
£
Outstanding at beginning of year 89,247,441 0.33 77,771,222 0.42
Granted during the year
(1),(2)
12,292,718 0.50 29,570,764 0.28
Forfeited during the year (12,013,719) 0.31 (6,352,907) 0.83
Exercised during the year (27,359,417) 0.27 (11,741,638) 0.56
Outstanding at end of year 62,167,023 0.39 89,247,441 0.33
Exercisable at end of year 6,253,122 0.29 3,639,445 1.60
(1) The charge to the income statement for the years ended 2 February 2013 and 28 January 2012 in respect of share-based payments includes the first
year’s charge of the 2013 and 2012 Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme (‘KISS’) grants respectively, based on the bonus for the year. Since grants under
the KISS are made following the year end to which the first year of charge relates, it is not possible to give the number of options granted until after the
year end.
(2) The weighted average exercise price for options granted during the year represents a blend of nil price KISS, Performance Share Plan and Store
Management Incentive Share Scheme options and discounted Sharesave options (see below).
Information on the share schemes is given in note 13 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
Options have been exercised on a regular basis throughout the year. On that basis, the weighted average share price during the
year, rather than at the date of exercise, is £2.81 (2011/12: £2.55). The options outstanding at the end of the year have exercise
prices ranging from £nil to £2.38 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.1 years (2011/12: 3.6 years).
The Group recognised a total expense of £9m in the year ended 2 February 2013 (2011/12: £32m) relating to equity-settled
share-based payment transactions.
Under IFRS 2, ‘Share-based payment’, the Group recognises a charge for share options granted after 7 November 2002. Option
numbers and other disclosures above are for those options granted after this date. A full list of outstanding options is given in note
13 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
96
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
30 Share-based payments continued
The fair value of share options and deferred shares is determined by independent valuers using Black-Scholes and stochastic
option pricing models. The inputs of the principal schemes into these models are as follows:
Date of
grant
Share price
at grant
£
Exercise
price
£
Expected
life
(2)
years
Expected
volatility
(3)
%
Dividend
yield
%
Risk free
rate
%
Fair
value
(4)
£
Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme
(1)
21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – – – 1.63
06/04/10 2.24 – 7.0 – – – 2.24
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 – – – 2.33
12/04/11 2.60 – 7.0 – – – 2.60
06/05/11 2.80 – 7.0 – – – 2.80
25/04/12 2.96 – 7.0 – – – 2.96
Performance Share Plan 01/02/08 1.51 – 7.0 28.2% – – 0.92
01/02/08 1.51 – 7.0 – – – 1.51
21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
24/07/08 1.24 – 7.0 – – – 1.24
01/10/08 1.35 – 7.0 35.9% – – 0.79
01/10/08 1.35 – 7.0 – – – 1.35
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 44.9% – 2.2% 1.17
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – – – 1.63
30/10/09 2.24 – 7.0 – – – 2.24
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 – – – 2.33
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 46.7% – 1.5% 1.30
21/10/10 2.47 – 7.0 – – – 2.47
12/04/11 2.60 – 7.0 – – – 2.60
17/06/11 2.65 – 7.0 – – – 2.65
21/10/11 2.63 – 7.0 – – – 2.63
03/05/12 2.91 – 7.0 – – – 2.91
16/10/12 2.81 – 7.0 – – – 2.81
Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme 21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
Store Management Incentive Share 21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – 3.3% – 1.48
Scheme 30/10/09 2.24 – 2.5 – 2.4% – 2.11
UK and International Sharesave 26/10/06 2.65 1.97 5.5 28.1% 4.0% 4.0% 0.38
01/11/07 1.90 1.55 5.5 25.5% 5.6% 5.0% 0.20
29/10/08 1.09 1.09 3.5 36.3% 4.9% 3.4% 0.14
29/10/08 1.09 1.09 5.5 30.8% 4.9% 3.8% 0.10
03/11/09 2.24 1.72 3.5 43.6% 2.4% 2.2% 0.51
03/11/09 2.24 1.72 5.5 36.4% 2.4% 2.9% 0.38
28/10/10 2.39 1.87 3.5 44.3% 2.3% 1.1% 0.53
28/10/10 2.39 1.87 5.5 37.3% 2.3% 1.9% 0.39
26/10/11 2.64 1.99 3.5 39.1% 2.9% 0.9% 0.54
26/10/11 2.64 1.99 5.5 37.6% 2.9% 1.4% 0.42
19/10/12 2.85 2.17 3.5 25.9% 3.3% 0.4% 0.45
19/10/12 2.85 2.17 5.5 37.6% 3.3% 0.9% 0.49
Executive Share Option Scheme 17/04/03 2.44 2.38 10.0 35.0% 4.0% 4.2% 0.64
(1) The Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme includes the Company Share Option Plan (‘CSOP’) element of the KISS awards. Details of the CSOP element
of the award are set out in the Director’s Remuneration Report.
(2) Expected life is disclosed based on the UK schemes. For the KISS and PSP schemes in the UK, the expiry date is 7 years from the date of grant.
Expiry of overseas KISS schemes and CSOP is 6 months from the date of vesting. Expiry of overseas PSP schemes is 1 year from the date of vesting.
(3) Expected volatility was determined for each individual award, by calculating the historical volatility of the Group’s share price (plus reinvested dividends)
immediately prior to the grant of the award, over the same period as the vesting period of each award, adjusted by expectations of future volatility.
(4) The fair values of UK and International Sharesave awards granted on or before 1 January 2009 have been restated to reflect the 17 January 2008
amendment to IFRS 2 on vesting conditions and cancellations.
97
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
31 Cash generated by operations
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Operating profit 695 807
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates (20) (32)
Depreciation and amortisation 248 237
Impairment losses 8 7
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 5 7
Share-based compensation charge 9 32
Increase in inventories (191) (94)
Increase in trade and other receivables (6) (28)
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables 19 (65)
Movement in provisions 14 (24)
Movement in post employment benefits (51) (20)
Cash generated by operations 730 827
32 Net cash
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Cash and cash equivalents 398 587
Bank overdrafts – (102)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts 398 485
Bank loans (68) (98)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (298) (478)
Financing derivatives 71 67
Finance leases (65) (64)
Net cash/(debt) 38 (88)
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Net (debt)/cash at beginning of year (88) 14
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts (106) (118)
Repayment of bank loans 31 10
Repayment of Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 162 30
Payment on financing derivatives – 5
Capital element of finance lease rental payments 12 16
Cash flow movement in net debt 99 (57)
Exchange differences and other non-cash movements 27 (45)
Net cash/(debt) at end of year 38 (88)
33 Acquisitions
In the prior year the Group acquired non-controlling interests in three of its B&Q China subsidiaries for a cash consideration of £8m.
In addition the Group acquired National Energy Services Limited in the UK for £2m.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
98
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
34 Commitments
Operating lease commitments
The Group leases various retail stores, offices, warehouses and plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating lease
agreements. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. Lease arrangements under which rental
payments are contingent upon sales, other performance or usage are not significant for the Group.
Undiscounted total future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Less than one year 461 434
One to five years 1,589 1,555
More than five years 2,637 2,867
4,687 4,856
The total of future minimum operating sublease receipts expected to be received is £203m (2011/12: £240m).
Capital commitments
Capital commitments contracted but not provided for by the Group amount to £36m (2011/12: £139m).
35 Contingent liabilities
The Group has arranged for certain guarantees to be provided to third parties in the ordinary course of business. Of these
guarantees, only £1m (2011/12: £10m) would crystallise due to possible future events not wholly within the Group’s control.
The Group is subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and provision is made where liabilities are
considered likely to arise on the basis of current information and legal advice.
36 Related party transactions
During the year, the Company and its subsidiaries carried out a number of transactions with related parties in the normal course of
business and on an arm’s length basis. The names of the related parties, the nature of these transactions and their total value are
shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Transactions with Koçta s¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. in which the Group
holds a 50% interest
Provision of employee services (0.2) (0.1) – –
Commission and other income 0.8 0.4 0.9 1.0
Transactions with Hornbach Holding A.G. in which the Group holds a 21% interest
Commission and other income 0.9 0.1 3.8 0.3
Other expenses – – (0.3) –
Transactions with Crealfi S.A. in which the Group holds a 49% interest
Provision of employee services 0.1 – 0.1 –
Commission and other income 4.3 0.3 7.0 1.5
Transactions with Kingfisher Pension Scheme
Provision of administrative services 1.4 0.1 1.1 –
Services are usually negotiated with related parties on a cost-plus basis. Goods are sold or bought on the basis of the price lists in
force with non-related parties.
The remuneration of key management personnel is given in note 8.
Other transactions with the Kingfisher Pension Scheme are detailed in note 27.
99
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Independent auditors’ report to the members of Kingfisher plc
We have audited the Group financial statements of Kingfisher
plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 which comprise the
Consolidated income statement, the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, the Consolidated statement of changes
in equity, the Consolidated balance sheet, the Consolidated
cash flow statement and the related notes 1 to 36. The financial
reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation
is applicable law and International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the Company’s members,
as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken
so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters
we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for
no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do
not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our
audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities
statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation
of the Group financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit
and express an opinion on the Group financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and International Standards
on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to
comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards
for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or
error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the Group’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed;
the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made
by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the financial
statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-
financial information in the annual report to identify material
inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we
become aware of any apparent material misstatements or
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the Group financial statements:
• give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s affairs as
at 2 February 2013 and of its profit for the year then ended;
• have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRS as
adopted by the European Union; and
• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies
Act 2006
In our opinion:
• the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited
has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006; and
• the information given in the Directors’ report for the financial
year for which the Group financial statements are prepared is
consistent with the Group financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to
you if, in our opinion:
• certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit.
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
• the Directors’ statement, contained within the Directors’
responsibilities statement in relation to going concern;
• the part of the Corporate governance statement relating to
the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the
UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review; and
• certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board
on directors’ remuneration.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the Parent Company financial
statements of Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Panos Kakoullis
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
100
ACCOUNTS
Company balance sheet
At 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets 3 – –
Investments 4 6,978 6,941
6,978 6,941
Current assets
Debtors due within one year 5 3,414 3,088
Debtors due after more than one year 5 62 75
Cash at bank and in hand 124 278
3,600 3,441
Current liabilities
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 6 (5,669) (5,318)
Net current liabilities (2,069) (1,877)
Total assets less current liabilities 4,909 5,064
Non-current liabilities
Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 7 (278) (315)
Provisions for liabilities 8 (7) (6)
(285) (321)
Net assets excluding net pension asset 4,624 4,743
Net pension asset 9 – 6
Net assets 4,624 4,749
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital 10 373 372
Share premium account 11 2,204 2,199
Other reserves 11 711 711
Profit and loss account 11 1,336 1,467
Equity shareholders’ funds 12 4,624 4,749
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013 and signed on its behalf by:
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
Group Chief Executive Group Finance Director
101
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements
1 Principal accounting policies
The financial statements of Kingfisher plc (‘the Company’)
are made up to the nearest Saturday to 31 January each year.
The directors of Kingfisher plc, having made appropriate
enquiries, consider that adequate resources exist for the
Company to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future and that, therefore, it is appropriate to
adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial
statements for the year ended 2 February 2013. Refer to
the Directors’ statement of responsibility on page 33.
The financial statements have been prepared under the
historical cost convention, as modified by the use of valuations
for certain financial instruments, share-based payments and
pensions, and are prepared in accordance with applicable
accounting standards in the United Kingdom and the
Companies Act 2006.
The Company’s financial statements are included in the
consolidated financial statements of Kingfisher plc. As
permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the profit
and loss account and statement of total recognised gains and
losses are not presented. The Company has taken advantage
of the exemption from preparing a cash flow statement under
the terms of FRS 1, ‘Cash flow statements’. The Company is
exempt under the terms of FRS 8, ‘Related party disclosures’,
from disclosing related party transactions with wholly
owned subsidiaries of Kingfisher plc. The Company has
taken advantage of the exemption to provide financial
instrument disclosures under the terms of FRS 29,
‘Financial instruments: Disclosures’.
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation
of these financial statements are set out below. These policies
have been consistently applied to the years presented, unless
otherwise stated.
a. Foreign currencies
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Sterling at the rates of exchange
at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences on monetary
items are taken to the profit and loss account.
Principal rate of exchange against Sterling:
Euro 2012/13 2011/12
Year end rate 1.15 1.19
b. Tangible fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets are carried in the balance sheet at
cost less accumulated depreciation and any provisions for
impairment. Depreciation is provided to reflect a straight line
reduction from cost to estimated residual value over the
estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
Fixtures and fittings – between 4 and 20 years
Computers and electronic equipment – between 3 and 5 years
Motor cars – 4 years
Tangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment is
conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference
to the higher of value-in-use and net realisable value. Any
impairment in value is charged to the profit and loss account
in the period in which it occurs.
c. Investments
Investments in subsidiaries and associates are included in the
balance sheet at cost, less any provisions for impairment.
d. Operating leases
Rentals under operating leases are charged to the profit
and loss account in the period to which the payments relate.
Incentives received or paid to enter into lease agreements are
released to the profit and loss account on a straight line basis
over the lease term or, if shorter, the period to the date on
which the rent is first expected to be adjusted to the prevailing
market rate.
e. Employee benefits
(i) Pensions
The Company operates defined benefit and defined contribution
pension schemes for its employees. A defined benefit scheme
is a pension scheme that defines an amount of pension
benefit that an employee will receive on retirement. A defined
contribution scheme is a pension scheme under which the
Company usually pays fixed contributions into a separate entity.
In all cases a separate fund is being accumulated to meet the
accruing liabilities. The assets of each of these funds are either
held under trusts or managed by insurance companies and
are held entirely separate from the Company’s assets.
The asset or liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect
of defined benefit pension schemes is the fair value of scheme
assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at
the balance sheet date, together with an adjustment for any past
service costs not yet recognised. The defined benefit obligation
is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the
projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined
benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated
future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality
corporate bonds which are denominated in the currency in
which the benefits will be paid and which have terms to maturity
approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
A net pension asset is only recognised to the extent that it is
recoverable either through reduced future contributions or
through agreed refunds from the scheme.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited
directly to the profit and loss reserve as they arise.
Past service costs are recognised immediately in the profit
and loss account, unless the changes to the pension scheme
are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a
specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the
past service costs are amortised on a straight line basis over
the vesting period.
For defined contribution schemes, the Company pays
contributions to privately administered pension schemes on
a contractual basis. The Company has no further payment
obligations once the contributions have been paid. The
contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense
when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an
asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future
payments is available.
(ii) Share-based compensation
The Group operates several equity-settled, share-based
compensation schemes for the employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries using the Company’s equity instruments.
The fair value of the Company’s employees’ services received
in exchange for the grant of options or deferred shares is
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
102
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
1 Principal accounting policies continued
recognised as an expense and is calculated using Black-
Scholes and stochastic models. The total amount to be
expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference
to the fair value of the options or deferred shares granted,
excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. The
value of the charge is adjusted to reflect expected and actual
levels of options vesting due to non-market vesting conditions.
The fair value of the compensation given to subsidiaries in
respect of share-based compensation schemes is recognised
as a capital contribution over the vesting period. The capital
contribution is reduced by any payments received from
subsidiaries in respect of these schemes.
(iii) Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (‘ESOP’)
The ESOP is a separately administered discretionary trust.
Liabilities of the ESOP are guaranteed by the Company and the
assets of the ESOP mainly comprise shares in the Company.
Own shares held by the ESOP are deducted from equity
shareholders’ funds and the shares are held at historical cost
until they are sold. The assets, liabilities, income and costs
of the ESOP are included in both the Company’s and the
consolidated financial statements.
f. Deferred tax
Provision is made for deferred tax using the incremental
provision approach and is measured on an undiscounted
basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods
in which timing differences reverse, based on tax rates and
laws substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of timing differences
that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet
date subject to the following:
deferred tax is not recognised on the revaluation of non-
monetary assets such as property unless a binding sale
agreement exists at the balance sheet date. Where rollover
relief is available on an asset, deferred tax is not recognised;
deferred tax is recognised on unremitted earnings of overseas
subsidiaries and associates only where dividends are accrued
as receivable or there is an intention to remit these in the
foreseeable future;
deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that they are
regarded as recoverable. Assets are regarded as recoverable
when it is regarded as more likely than not that there will be
suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the
underlying timing differences can be deducted; and
deferred tax is not recognised on permanent differences.
g. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present
legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it
is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be
required to settle the obligation and the amount can be
reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognised for future
operating losses.
h. Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
Company’s balance sheet when the Company becomes a party
to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets
are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows
from the financial asset expire or the Company has substantially
transferred the risks and rewards of ownership. Financial
liabilities (or a part of a financial liability) are derecognised
when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged
or cancelled or expires.
(i) Borrowings
Interest bearing borrowings are recorded at the proceeds
received, net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured
at amortised cost. Where borrowings are in designated and
effective fair value hedge relationships, adjustments are made
to their carrying amounts to reflect the hedged risks. Finance
charges, including premiums payable on settlement or
redemption and direct issue costs, are amortised to the
profit and loss account using the effective interest method.
(ii) Trade creditors
Trade creditors are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost.
(iii) Derivatives and hedge accounting
Where hedge accounting is not applied, or to the extent to
which it is not effective, changes in the fair value of derivatives
are recognised in the profit and loss account as they arise.
Derivatives are initially recorded at fair value on the date a
derivative contract is entered into and subsequently carried at
fair value. The accounting treatment of derivatives classified as
hedges depends on their designation, which occurs at the start
of the hedge relationship. The Company designates certain
derivatives as a hedge of the fair value of an asset or liability
(‘fair value hedge’).
For an effective hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value,
the hedged item is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable
to the risk being hedged with the corresponding entry being
recorded in the profit and loss account. Gains or losses from
remeasuring the corresponding hedging instrument are also
recognised in the profit and loss account.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the Company
documents in advance the relationship between the item
being hedged and the hedging instrument. The Company
also documents and demonstrates an assessment of the
relationship between the hedged item and the hedging
instrument, which shows that the hedge has been and will be
highly effective on an ongoing basis. The effectiveness testing
is re-performed at each period end to ensure that the hedge
remains highly effective.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies
for hedge accounting.
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other
host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their
risks and characteristics are not closely related to those of
host contracts, and the host contracts are not carried at fair
value with unrealised gains or losses reported in the profit
and loss account.
103
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Profit and loss account disclosures
The audit fee for the Company and the consolidated financial statements is disclosed in note 7 of the Kingfisher plc consolidated
financial statements. Fees payable to Deloitte LLP and their associates for audit and non-audit services to the Company are not
required to be disclosed because the Group financial statements disclose such fees on a consolidated basis. Details of the
Company’s policy on the use of auditors for non-audit services, the reasons why the auditor was used rather than another supplier
and how the auditor’s independence and objectivity was safeguarded are set out in the Audit Committee Report on page 41.
Dividend disclosures are provided in note 11 of the Kingfisher plc consolidated financial statements.
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Wages and salaries 21 24
Social security costs 3 5
Pensions
Defined contribution 2 1
Defined benefit (service cost only) 1 1
Share-based compensation 7 9
Employee benefit expenses 34 40
Number 2012/13 2011/12
Average number of persons employed
Administration 172 170
Directors’ remuneration and details of share option exercises are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59.
Total Directors’ remuneration for the year is £4.6m (2011/12: £4.4m).
3 Tangible fixed assets
£ millions
Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
Cost
At 29 January 2012 4
At 2 February 2013 4
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (4)
At 2 February 2013 (4)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 –
At 28 January 2012 –
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
104
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
4 Investments
£ millions
Investments
in Group
undertakings
At 29 January 2012 6,941
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments 71
Contributions received relating to share-based payments (34)
At 2 February 2013 6,978
The Directors consider that to give the full particulars of all subsidiary undertakings would lead to a statement of excessive length.
In accordance with Section 410(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2006, the information below relates to those Group undertakings at the
financial year end whose results or financial position, in the opinion of the Directors, principally affect the figures of the consolidated
financial statements of Kingfisher plc. Details of all subsidiary undertakings will be annexed to the next Annual Return of Kingfisher
plc to be filed at Companies House.
Country of incorporation
and operation
% interest held and
voting rights Class of share owned Main activity
B&Q plc Great Britain 100% Ordinary & special
(1)
Retailing
B&Q Properties Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Property investment
Halcyon Finance Ltd
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary Finance
Kingfisher Information Technology Services (UK) Limited
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary IT services
Screwfix Direct Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Retailing
Sheldon Holdings Limited
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary Holding company
Zeus Land Investments Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Holding company
B&Q Ireland Limited Ireland 100% Ordinary Retailing
Brico Dépôt S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Retailing
Castorama Dubois Investissements S.C.A.
(3),(4)
France 100% Ordinary Holding company
Castorama France S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Retailing
Eurodépôt Immobilier S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Property investment
Immobilière Castorama S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Property investment
Kingfisher France S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Holding company
B&Q Asia Holdings Ltd
(5)
Hong Kong 100% Ordinary Holding company
Kingfisher Asia Limited Hong Kong 100% Ordinary Sourcing
B&Q (China) B.V.
(5)
Netherlands 100% Ordinary Holding company
Castim Sp.z.o.o.
(3)
Poland 100% Ordinary Property investment
Castorama Polska Sp.z.o.o.
(3)
Poland 100% Ordinary Retailing
Castorama RUS LLC
(6)
Russia 100% Ordinary Retailing
Euro Dépôt España S.A.U.
(3)
Spain 100% Ordinary Retailing
(1) The special shares in B&Q plc are owned 100% by Kingfisher plc and are non-voting.
(2) Held directly by Kingfisher plc.
(3) Owing to local conditions, these companies prepare their financial statements to 31 January.
(4) Castorama Dubois Investissements S.C.A. is 100% owned, of which 45% is held directly by Kingfisher plc.
(5) Holding companies for the Group’s Chinese retailing operations, which have a 31 December year end.
(6) Owing to local conditions, this company prepares its financial statements to 31 December.
105
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
5 Debtors
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Amounts falling due within one year
Owed by Group undertakings 3,314 3,014
Corporation tax 71 64
Derivatives 28 8
Other debtors 1 2
3,414 3,088
Amounts falling due after more than one year
Derivatives 55 65
Deferred tax assets 7 10
62 75
6 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 32 172
Derivatives 1 1
Owed to Group undertakings 5,600 5,097
Accruals and other payables 36 48
5,669 5,318
7 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Borrowings
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 306
266 306
Derivatives 12 9
278 315
Borrowings fall due for repayment as follows:
One to two years 78 34
Two to five years 49 131
More than five years 139 141
266 306
8 Provisions for liabilities
£ millions
Onerous
property
contracts
At 29 January 2012 6
Charge to income statement 1
At 2 February 2013 7
Within the onerous property contracts provision, the Company has provided against future liabilities for all properties sublet at a
shortfall and long term idle properties. The provision is based on the present value of future cash outflows relating to rent, rates and
service charges.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
106
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
9 Net pension asset
The Company participates in both a funded defined benefit scheme and a funded defined contribution scheme.
Defined contribution scheme
Pension costs for the defined contribution scheme, at rates specified in the scheme’s rules, are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Charge to operating profit 2 1
From July 2012 an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered to all Company employees. Eligible Company
employees will be automatically enrolled into the defined contribution scheme from 31 March 2013.
Defined benefit scheme
Kingfisher plc is one of a number of Group companies that participate in the Kingfisher Pension Scheme, and therefore the
Company has accounted for its share of the scheme assets and liabilities. The valuation of the scheme has been based on the
most recent actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2010 and has been updated to 2 February 2013.
During the year, and following consultation with the active members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed to future
benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012. The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. The closure to future accrual
resulted in an exceptional non-cash curtailment gain of £1m, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities as benefits
are no longer linked to future salary increases other than in line with inflation. Furthermore, it resulted in a full provision against
the net surplus being recognised at the curtailment date. This exceptional non-cash asset restriction loss of £6m reflects the
requirements under UK accounting standards, which restrict the amount of surplus that can be recognised following the closure
to future accrual of benefits.
In the prior year the Company entered into the second phase of an arrangement with the scheme Trustee to address an element of
the scheme deficit. Further details on this arrangement are given in note 27 of the consolidated financial statements. As part of this
arrangement, the Company made a contribution of £106m to the scheme and subsequently recharged the other participating
Group entities based on their share of pensionable payroll, resulting in a net cash contribution of £3m.
Profit and loss account
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Amounts charged/(credited) to operating profit
Current service cost 1 1
Curtailment gain (1) –
Asset restriction loss 6 –
6 1
Amounts charged/(credited) to net finance costs
Interest on defined benefit obligation 3 3
Expected return on pension scheme assets (3) (3)
– –
Total charged to profit and loss account 6 1
Balance sheet
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Present value of defined benefit obligation (59) (55)
Fair value of scheme assets 67 62
Net pension asset before provision for asset restriction and deferred tax 8 7
Provision for asset restriction (8) –
Net pension asset before deferred tax – 7
Related deferred tax liability – (1)
Net pension asset – 6
Movements in the net pension asset before deferred tax are as follows:
£ millions
Defined
benefit
obligation
Scheme
assets Total
Provision for
asset
restriction Net
At 29 January 2012 (55) 62 7 – 7
Current service cost (1) – (1) – (1)
Curtailment gain 1 – 1 – 1
Asset restriction loss – – – (6) (6)
Interest on defined benefit obligation (3) – (3) – (3)
Expected return on pension scheme assets – 3 3 – 3
Actuarial (losses)/gains (3) 3 – (2) (2)
Contributions paid by employer – 1 1 – 1
Benefits paid 2 (2) – – –
At 2 February 2013 (59) 67 8 (8) –
107
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
9 Net pension asset continued
£ millions
Defined
benefit
obligation
Scheme
assets Total
At 30 January 2011 (45) 47 2
Current service cost (1) – (1)
Interest on defined benefit obligation (3) – (3)
Expected return on pension scheme assets – 3 3
Actuarial (losses)/gains (8) 9 1
Contributions paid by employer – 5 5
Benefits paid 2 (2) –
At 28 January 2012 (55) 62 7
The fair value of scheme assets is analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions % of total £ millions % of total
Equities 16 24% 14 23%
Bonds 40 60% 38 61%
Property 2 3% 3 5%
Other 9 13% 7 11%
Total fair value of scheme assets 67 100% 62 100%
The actual return on pension scheme assets is as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Actual return on pension scheme assets 6 12
The estimated amount of contributions expected to be paid to the pension scheme by the Company during the next financial
year is £1m.
Amounts for current and previous four years
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09
Present value of defined benefit obligation (59) (55) (45) (49) (41)
Fair value of scheme assets 67 62 47 44 40
Net pension asset/(liability) before provision for asset restriction and deferred tax 8 7 2 (5) (1)
Provision for asset restriction (8) – – – –
Net pension asset/(liability) before deferred tax – 7 2 (5) (1)
Changes in assumptions underlying present value of defined benefit obligation (3) (8) 2 (6) 1
Percentage of defined benefit obligation 5% 15% (4%) 12% (2%)
Experience gains arising on defined benefit obligations – – 2 – –
Percentage of defined benefit obligation – – (4%) – –
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets 3 9 – 1 (7)
Percentage of scheme assets 4% 15% – 2% (18%)
Provision for asset restriction (2) – – – –
Total (losses)/gains recognised in the profit and loss reserve in the year (2) 1 4 (5) (6)
Cumulative losses recognised in the profit and loss reserve (15) (13)
Principal actuarial valuation assumptions
The assumptions used in calculating the costs and obligation of the defined benefit pension scheme are set by the Directors after
consultation with independent professionally qualified actuaries. The assumptions are based on the conditions at the time and
changes in these assumptions can lead to significant movements in the estimated obligation.
The discount rate is based on the yield on the iBoxx over 15 year AA-rated Sterling corporate bond index adjusted for the difference
in term between iBoxx and scheme liabilities. The overall expected rate of return on scheme assets reflects market expectations at
the valuation date of long term asset returns and the mix of assets in the scheme.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
108
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
9 Net pension asset continued
Annual % rate 2012/13 2011/12
Discount rate 4.6 4.5
Salary escalation n/a 3.8
Rate of pension increases 3.3 3.0
Price inflation 3.3 3.0
% rate of return 2012/13 2011/12
Equities 7.6 7.6
Bonds 3.5 3.4
Property 5.9 5.8
Other 4.7 4.9
Overall expected rate of return 4.7 4.6
The mortality assumptions used in the actuarial valuations have been selected with regard to the characteristics and experience of
the membership of the scheme from 2007 to 2010. The base mortality assumptions have been derived by adjusting standard
mortality tables (SAPS tables) projected forward to 2010 with the medium cohort improvement factors for males and with the
standard improvement factors for females. In addition, allowance has been made for future increases in life expectancy. For males,
the allowance is in line with medium cohort improvements subject to a minimum rate of improvement of 1% pa, and for females,
the allowance is in line with the average of the standard series and long cohort improvements, subject to a minimum of 1% pa.
These improvements take into account trends observed within the scheme over the past decade and general population trends.
The assumptions for life expectancy of the scheme members are as follows:
Years 2012/13 2011/12
Age to which current pensioners are expected to live (60 now)
– Male 86.4 86.4
– Female 87.1 87.1
Age to which future pensioners are expected to live (60 in 15 years’ time)
– Male 87.1 87.1
– Female 88.7 88.7
10 Called up share capital
Number of
ordinary
shares
millions
Ordinary
share capital
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 2,369 372
New shares issued under share schemes 3 1
At 2 February 2013 2,372 373
At 30 January 2011 2,364 371
New shares issued under share schemes 5 1
At 28 January 2012 2,369 372
109
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
11 Reserves
£ millions
Share
premium
account
Other
reserves
Profit and loss
account Total
At 29 January 2012 2,199 711 1,467 4,377
Profit for the year – – 8 8
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension scheme – – (2) (2)
Share-based compensation – – 7 7
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments – – 71 71
New shares issued under share schemes 5 – – 5
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 6 6
Dividends – – (221) (221)
At 2 February 2013 2,204 711 1,336 4,251
The other reserves represent the premium on the issue of convertible loan stock in 1993 and the merger reserve relating to the
acquisition of Darty.
The value of own shares deducted from the profit and loss reserve at 2 February 2013 is £60m (2011/12: £134m).
12 Reconciliation of movement in equity shareholders’ funds
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Profit for the year 8 510
Dividends (221) (178)
(213) 332
Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension scheme (2) 1
Share-based compensation 7 9
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments 71 –
New shares issued under share schemes 6 6
Own shares issued under share schemes 6 11
Own shares purchased – (117)
Net (decrease)/increase in equity shareholders' funds (125) 242
Equity shareholders' funds at beginning of year 4,749 4,507
Equity shareholders' funds at end of year 4,624 4,749
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
110
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
13 Share options
Options to subscribe under the various schemes for ordinary shares of 15
5/7
p, including those held by the executive Directors
disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59, are shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
Date of grant
Exercisable
from
Exercise price
£
Options
Number
Options
Number
Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme 21/04/09 21/04/12 – 207,009 2,620,537
06/04/10 06/04/13 – 2,198,684 2,472,705
05/05/10 05/05/13 – 5,126,662 5,841,849
12/04/11 12/04/14 – 3,763,341 4,237,554
06/05/11 06/05/14 – 646,141 722,680
25/04/12 25/04/15 – 4,388,519 –
16,330,356 15,895,325
Restricted Awards 20/11/08 01/04/12 – – 20,000
01/04/09 01/04/12 – – 70,000
06/04/10 21/04/11 – 42,190 42,190
06/04/10 21/04/12 – 65,835 65,835
06/04/10 21/04/13 – 19,762 19,762
30/04/10 21/04/12 – – 12,065
24/08/10 24/08/13 – 23,095 23,095
18/01/11 09/06/13 – 6,815 6,815
21/02/11 01/06/12 – 12,533 12,533
21/02/11 01/06/13 – 21,268 21,268
21/02/11 01/06/14 – 4,557 4,557
21/02/11 01/06/15 – 1,709 1,709
26/04/11 21/04/12 – 25,569 49,308
03/01/12 31/05/12 – – 17,308
03/01/12 21/05/13 – 6,344 6,344
03/01/12 31/05/14 – 10,300 10,300
16/10/12 16/01/14 – 5,975 –
245,952 383,089
Performance Share Plan 01/02/08 01/02/12 – 1,299,709 1,257,267
21/04/08 21/04/12 – 867,504 8,870,842
24/07/08 24/07/12 – – 1,460,627
01/10/08 01/10/11 – 745,856 721,402
01/10/08 01/02/12 – 745,856 721,402
01/10/08 01/10/12 – 303,212 1,382,616
21/04/09 21/04/12 – 412,486 3,900,823
30/10/09 21/04/12 – 2,509 623,860
30/10/09 21/04/13 – – 289,681
05/05/10 05/05/13 – 8,240,710 9,143,902
21/10/10 21/04/12 – 28,586 52,258
21/10/10 05/05/13 – 72,128 69,776
12/04/11 05/05/13 – 164,945 160,208
17/06/11 17/06/14 – 8,264,108 9,075,581
17/06/11 17/06/15 – 8,242,011 9,075,677
21/10/11 05/05/13 – 22,095 59,297
21/10/11 17/06/14 – 142,346 159,021
21/10/11 17/06/15 – 142,351 159,021
03/05/12 17/06/14 – 424,398 –
03/05/12 17/06/15 – 424,407 –
16/10/12 17/06/14 – 583,611 –
16/10/12 17/06/15 – 583,619 –
31,712,447 47,183,261
111
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
13 Share options continued
2012/13 2011/12
Date of grant
Exercisable
from
Exercise price
£
Options
Number
Options
Number
Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme 21/04/08 21/04/12 – 145,000 1,530,000
145,000 1,530,000
Store Management Incentive Share Scheme 21/04/09 21/04/12 – 231,000 6,093,077
30/10/09 21/04/12 – – 1,187,642
231,000 7,280,719
UK and International Sharesave 26/10/06 01/12/11 1.97 – 198,143
01/11/07 01/12/12 1.55 139,052 865,966
29/10/08 01/12/11 1.09 – 712,663
29/10/08 01/12/13 1.09 3,116,385 3,292,782
03/11/09 01/12/12 1.72 371,226 2,579,091
03/11/09 01/12/14 1.72 1,087,075 1,192,388
28/10/10 01/12/13 1.87 1,285,330 1,460,422
28/10/10 01/12/15 1.87 599,082 694,101
26/10/11 01/12/14 1.99 2,862,161 3,370,553
26/10/11 01/12/16 1.99 530,998 643,891
19/10/12 01/12/15 2.17 2,275,239 –
19/10/12 01/12/17 2.17 467,618 –
12,734,166 15,010,000
Executive, International Executive 09/04/02 09/04/05 2.90 – 1,194,689
and Phantom Share Option Schemes 09/04/02 09/04/06 2.86 – 701,976
08/10/02 08/10/05 1.95 – 763,347
08/10/02 08/10/06 1.95 – 521,309
17/04/03 17/04/06 2.38 436,215 1,365,947
17/04/03 17/04/07 2.38 331,890 599,100
768,105 5,146,368
Total 62,167,026 92,428,762
The Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme (‘KISS’) and Performance Share Plan are described as part of the Directors’ Remuneration
Report on pages 45 to 59.
Restricted Awards are granted as one-off compensatory awards granted under the rules of the KISS. They are nil cost options,
as with the KISS, but do not accrue dividends until after they are exercised. Vesting dates may vary according to individual grants.
Certain employees, excluding directors, have been granted contingent share awards under the Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme.
The Store Management Incentive Share Scheme provided provisional awards to store managers in 2009 with vesting dates of
April 2011 and April 2012. There are performance conditions based on store standards and an award will lapse if these are not
maintained throughout the performance period. These awards do not accrue dividends during the vesting period.
Under the UK Sharesave scheme, eligible UK employees have been invited to enter into HMRC approved savings contracts for a
period of three or five years, whereby shares may be acquired with repayments under the contract. The option price is the average
market price over three days prior to an offer to subscribe, discounted by 20%. Options are exercisable within a six month period
from the conclusion of a three or five year period. The International Sharesave scheme, which operates along similar lines to the
UK Sharesave scheme, includes eligible employees in certain overseas locations.
The last grant of options under the Executive, International Executive and Phantom Share Option Schemes was made in April 2003.
Under these schemes, participants received a bi-annual grant of options based on their position in the Group. These options are
normally exercisable from the third anniversary of the date of the grant (up to the tenth anniversary), except where the performance
condition has not been met, in which case this date is deferred accordingly. The performance conditions for all options have now
been met. On the exercise of Phantom Share Options, participants receive in cash the increase in value of the allocated number
of shares in the Company.
The rules of all schemes include provision for the early exercise of options in certain circumstances.
Under FRS 20, ‘Share-based payment’, the Company recognises a charge for share options granted after 7 November 2002.
The Company has not repeated the disclosures required by FRS 20 as these are already included in note 30 of the Kingfisher plc
consolidated financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
112
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
13 Share options continued
The Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (‘ESOP’)
The ESOP is funded by an interest free loan from the Company of £95m (2011/12: £148m) to enable it to acquire shares in
Kingfisher plc. The shares are used to satisfy options awarded under the KISS, Performance Share Plan, Kingfisher Retention
Share Scheme, Store Management Incentive Share Scheme, Executive, International Executive and Phantom Share
Option Schemes.
The ESOP’s shareholding at 2 February 2013 is 21 million shares (2011/12: 46 million shares) with a nominal value of £3m
(2011/12: £7m) and a market value of £57m (2011/12: £119m). Dividends on these shares were waived for the interim and
final dividends.
14 Contingent liabilities
The Company has arranged for certain guarantees to be provided to third parties in the ordinary course of business. Of these
guarantees, £nil (2011/12: £4m) would crystallise due to possible events not wholly within the Company’s control.
15 Related party transactions
During the year, the Company carried out a number of transactions with related parties in the normal course of business and on
an arm’s length basis. The names of the related parties, the nature of these transactions and their total value are shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Transactions with Koçta s¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. in which the Group holds a 50% interest
Provision of employee services (0.1) – – –
Commission and other income 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4
Transactions with Hornbach Holding A.G. in which the Group holds a 21% interest
Commission and other income – – 0.1 –
Other expenses – – (0.3) –
Transactions with Kingfisher Pension Scheme
Provision of administrative services 1.4 0.1 1.1 –
Services are usually negotiated with related parties on a cost-plus basis. Goods are sold or bought on the basis of the price lists
in force with non-related parties.
Directors’ remuneration and details of share option exercises are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages
45 to 59.
Other transactions with the Kingfisher Pension Scheme are detailed in note 9.
113
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Independent Auditors’ report to the members of Kingfisher plc
We have audited the Company financial statements of
Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 which
comprise the Company balance sheet and the related notes
1 to 15. The financial reporting framework that has been
applied in their preparation is applicable law and United
Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice).
This report is made solely to the Company’s members,
as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the Company’s members those matters
we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for
no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do
not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our
audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities
statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of
the Company financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and
express an opinion on the Company financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and International Standards
on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to
comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards
for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made
by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the financial
statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-
financial information in the annual report to identify material
inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we
become aware of any apparent material misstatements or
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the Company financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs
as at 2 February 2013;
have been properly prepared in accordance with United
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements
of the Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies
Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Directors’ report
for the financial year for which the financial statements are
prepared is consistent with the Company financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters
where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if,
in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
received from branches not visited by us; or
the Company financial statements and the part of the
Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the Group financial statements
of Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 and on
the information in the Directors’ remuneration report that is
described as having been audited.
Panos Kakoullis
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
114
ACCOUNTS
Group five year financial summary
£ millions
2008/09
52 weeks
2009/10
52 weeks
2010/11
52 weeks
2011/12
52 weeks
2012/13
53 weeks
(1)
Income statement
Sales 10,026 10,503 10,450 10,831 10,573
Retail profit 503 664 762 882 781
Central costs (41) (41) (41) (43) (42)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (16) (17) (17) (20) (18)
Operating profit before exceptional items 446 606 704 819 721
Net finance costs before financing fair value remeasurements (78) (59) (34) (12) (6)
Adjusted pre-tax profit 368 547 670 807 715
Exceptional items (273) 17 (6) (12) (26)
Financing fair value remeasurements (5) 2 7 2 2
Profit before taxation 90 566 671 797 691
Income tax expense (88) (181) (180) (158) (127)
Profit from continuing operations 2 385 491 639 564
Balance sheet
Goodwill and other intangible assets 2,469 2,465 2,481 2,520 2,565
Property, plant and equipment and investment property 3,723 3,636 3,664 3,722 3,814
Investments in joint ventures and associates 219 234 259 271 289
Net current liabilities
(2)
(278) (648) (576) (290) (128)
Post employment benefits (74) (198) (58) (15) –
Other net non-current liabilities
(2)
(257) (284) (324) (393) (422)
Capital employed 5,802 5,205 5,446 5,815 6,118
Equity shareholders' funds 4,783 4,945 5,452 5,719 6,148
Non-controlling interests 15 10 8 8 8
Net debt/(cash) 1,004 250 (14) 88 (38)
Capital employed 5,802 5,205 5,446 5,815 6,118
Other financial data
Like-for-like sales growth (4.1%) (1.5%) (0.9%) 1.3% (2.9%)
Effective tax rate 31% 30% 29% 28% 27%
Basic earnings per share (pence) 0.2 16.5 21.0 27.5 24.1
Adjusted basic earnings per share (pence) 11.0 16.4 20.5 25.1 22.3
Dividend per share (pence) 5.325 5.5 7.07 8.84 9.46
Gross capital expenditure
(3)
390 256 310 450 316
(1) Like-for-like sales growth in 2012/13 is calculated by comparing 53 weeks against the equivalent 53 weeks of the prior year. This only impacts the UK &
Ireland businesses with all of the other businesses reporting on a calendar basis. The effect of the 53rd week on the results of the Group is the inclusion
of an additional £72m sales and an immaterial benefit to retail profit.
(2) Net current liabilities and other net non-current liabilities reported above exclude any components of net debt/(cash).
(3) Excluding business acquisitions.
115
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Shareholder information
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of Kingfisher plc will be held
on Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 11.00am at the Paddington
London Hilton Hotel, 146 Praed Street, London W2 1EE.
Financial calendar
The proposed financial calendar for 2013/14 is as follows:
First quarter results 30 May 2013
Pre-close first half trading results 24 July 2013
Interim results to 27 July 2013 11 September 2013
Third quarter results 28 November 2013
Fourth quarter results February 2014
Preliminary results to 1 February 2014 March 2014
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 6ZZ
Telephone: 0870 702 0129
Website: http://www.investorcentre.co.uk
Shareholder enquiries
Any queries that shareholders have regarding their
shareholdings, such as a change of name or address, transfer
of shares, lost share certificates or dividend cheques, should
be referred to the Registrar using the contact details above. A
Shareholder Helpline is available on UK business days between
8.30am and 5.30pm and contains an automated self-service
functionality which is available 24 hours a day.
Share dealing facilities
Shareholders have the opportunity to buy or sell Kingfisher plc
shares using a share dealing facility operated by the Registrar.
Telephone share dealing: Commission is 1%, plus £35; stamp
duty at 0.5% is payable on purchases. The service is available
from 8.00am to 4.30pm Monday to Friday excluding bank
holidays. Telephone: 0870 703 0084.
Internet share dealing: Commission is 1%, subject to a
minimum charge of £30; stamp duty at 0.5% is payable on
purchases. The service is available to place orders out of
market hours.
Simply log onto http://www.investorcentre.co.uk.
Terms and conditions of both of these services can be obtained
by calling 0870 702 0129.
Unauthorised brokers (boiler room scams)
Kingfisher plc is legally obliged to make its share register
available to the general public. Consequently some shareholders
may receive unsolicited mail, including correspondence from
unauthorised investment companies. We have become aware
that some shareholders have received unsolicited phone calls
or correspondence concerning investment matters. These
are typically from overseas based brokers who target UK
shareholders offering to sell what often turn out to be worthless
or high risk shares in US or UK investments. They can be very
persistent and extremely persuasive. Shareholders are advised
to be very wary of any unsolicited advice, offers to buy shares
at a discount or offers of free company reports. Details of any
share dealing facilities that the Company endorses will be
included in Company mailings.
Share price history
£ per ordinary share* Dollars per ADR**
Financial year High Low High Low
2012/13 3.14 2.54 9.98 7.81
2011/12 2.87 2.17 9.34 6.91
2010/11 2.72 1.96 8.16 5.93
2009/10 2.47 1.18 8.24 3.15
2008/09 1.53 0.91 5.45 3.53
* Based on the daily closing price of Kingfisher plc shares on the London
Stock Exchange
** Based on the daily closing price of Kingfisher plc ADR’s in the Over-the-
Counter (OTC) market
Dividend
The interim dividend for the financial year ended 2 February
2013 of 3.09p per share was paid on 16 November 2012.
The table below provides the payment information for the final
dividend of 6.37p per share, subject to shareholder approval
at the Annual General Meeting on 13 June 2013:
Ex-dividend date 8 May 2013
Record date 10 May 2013
Final date for return of DRIP mandate
forms/currency elections 24 May 2013
Euro exchange rate notification 29 May 2013
Payment date and DRIP purchase 17 June 2013
Payment methods
Shareholders can elect to receive their dividends in a number
of ways:
Cheque cash dividends will automatically be paid to
shareholders by cheque, which will be sent by post to the
shareholder’s registered address;
BACS cash dividends can be paid by mandate directly to a UK
bank or building society account through the BACS system.
This method of payment reduces the risk of your cheque
being intercepted or lost in the post. Shareholders wishing to
receive their dividends in this way can update their mandate
instructions at www.investorcentre.co.uk or should complete
a dividend mandate form and return it to the Registrars;
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) the Company also
offers shareholders a DRIP, whereby shareholders can use
their cash dividend to buy further shares in the Company.
Shareholders can apply online at www.investorcentre.co.uk or
complete a mandate form and return it to the address shown
above; and
Global Payments Service this service, provided by the
Registrar enables shareholders to have dividend payments
paid directly into their bank account in their chosen local
currency. To view terms and register, please visit
www.computershare.com/uk/investor/GPS.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
116
ACCOUNTS
Shareholder information continued
American Depositary Receipt (ADR)
The Company has a Sponsored Level 1 ADR programme in the
United States. Each ADR represents two Kingfisher shares.
Electronic communication
Shareholders who have not yet elected to receive shareholder
documentation in electronic form can sign up by visiting
www.investorcentre.co.uk/ecomms and registering their details.
When registering for electronic communications, shareholders
will be sent an email each time the Company publishes statutory
documents, providing a link to the information.
Electing for electronic communications does not mean that
shareholders cannot obtain hard copy documents. Should
shareholders require a paper copy of any of the Company’s
shareholder documentation, they should contact the Registrar
at the address stated under the section headed ‘Registrar’.
Corporate website
Shareholders are encouraged to visit Kingfisher’s corporate
website (www.kingfisher.com). The website includes information
about the Company, its strategy and business performance,
latest news and press releases and approach to corporate
governance. The Investor Relations section is a key tool for
shareholders, with information of share price, financial results,
shareholders meetings and dividends. This section also contains
frequently asked questions and copies of the current and past
annual reports.
Kingfisher has an Investor Relations app for the iPad. The app
provides access to the latest share price information, corporate
news, financial reports, presentations, corporate videos and
earnings webcasts both online and offline. It is updated with the
latest financial information at the same time as the corporate
website. To discover more, download it free from the App store.
Document viewing
Shareholders will have the opportunity to view certain
documentation as outlined in the Notice of Annual General
Meeting from at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting, until its
conclusion. The Articles of Association of the Company and
other documentation referred to in this Annual Report can be
viewed at the registered office during normal business hours.
Company Secretary and Registered Office
Paul Moore
Kingfisher plc
3 Sheldon Square
Paddington
London W2 6PX
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7372 8008
Fax: +44 (0)20 7644 1001
www.kingfisher.com
Registered in England and Wales
Registered Number 01664812
Forward-looking statements
Certain statements included in this Annual Report and
Accounts are forward-looking and should be considered,
amongst other statutory provisions, in light of the safe harbour
provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than historical facts
may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are
therefore subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied because they relate to future events.
These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements relating to the Company’s expectations around
the Company’s programme known as ‘Creating the Leader’
and its associated eight steps.
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
relevant terminology including the words: “believes”,
“estimates”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”,
“goal”, “target”, “aim”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “could” or
“should” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or
comparable terminology and include all matters that are not
historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout
this Annual Report and Accounts and include statements
regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations and
those of our officers, directors and employees concerning,
amongst other things, our results of operations, financial
condition, changes in tax rates, liquidity, prospects, growth,
strategies and the businesses we operate.
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those estimated by the forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, global economic business conditions,
monetary and interest rate policies, foreign currency exchange
rates, equity and property prices, the impact of competition,
inflation and deflation, changes to regulations, taxes and
legislation, changes to consumer saving and spending
habits; and our success in managing these factors.
Consequently, our actual future financial condition,
performance and results could differ materially from the
plans, goals and expectations set out in our forward-looking
statements. Reliance should not be placed on any forward-
looking statement. The forward-looking statements contained
herein speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and the
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
King?sher is included in two socially responsible indices, the FTSE4Good
and Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes.
For more information please visit www.king?sher.com
This document is printed on UPM Fine Offset, a paper containing virgin
?bre sourced from well managed, responsible, FSC® certi?ed forests.
100% of the inks used are vegetable oil based, 95% of press chemicals
are recycled for further use and, on average 99% of any waste
associated with this production will be recycled.
Printed by Park Communications on FSC® certi?ed paper.
Park is an EMAS certi?ed CarbonNeutral® Company and its
Environmental Management System is certi?ed to ISO14001
Designed and produced by Black Sun Plc www.blacksunplc.com
King?sher plc, 3 Sheldon Square, Paddington, London W2 6PX Telephone: +44 (0)20 7372 8008 www.king?sher.com
doc_215632582.pdf
Kingfisher plc is Europe’s leading home improvement retail Group and the third largest in the
world, with over 1,000 stores in eight countries in Europe and Asia. Its main retail brands are
B&Q, Castorama, Brico Dépôt and Screwfix. Kingfisher also operates the Koçtas¸ brand, a 50%
joint venture in Turkey with the Koç Group, and has a 21% interest in Hornbach, Germany’s
leading large format DIY retailer.
CREATING
THE
LEADER
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Progress report on our strategy
Our online reporting
Increasing numbers of our shareholders are choosing to receive their annual report online,
which helps us reduce the impact on the environment through lower paper usage. The
online version, available at www.kingfisher.com, enables you to download the report
to your computer desktop and access supplementary content, such as video interviews
with the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, and case studies from around
the Group businesses which highlight some of the year’s achievements.
If you have a smartphone or tablet device, use the links and QR codes in this printed copy
to take you straight to that part of the online report.
Key highlights
For the online report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
3
6
8
5
4
7
6
7
0
8
0
7
7
1
5
£715m
-11.4%
Adjusted pre-tax pro?t*(m)
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
1
.
0
1
6
.
4
2
0
.
5
2
5
.
1
2
2
.
3
22.3p
-11.2%
Adjusted basic earnings per share*(p)
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
5
.
3
2
5
.
5
7
.
0
7
8
.
8
4
9
.
4
6
9.46p
+7.0%
Full year dividend (p)
* For de?nitions see the Financial Review on pages 17 to 24.
1
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Kingfisher plc is Europe’s leading home improvement retail Group and the third largest in the
world, with over 1,000 stores in eight countries in Europe and Asia. Its main retail brands are
B&Q, Castorama, Brico Dépôt and Screwfix. Kingfisher also operates the Koçtas¸ brand, a 50%
joint venture in Turkey with the Koç Group, and has a 21% interest in Hornbach, Germany’s
leading large format DIY retailer.
Contents
Business review
02 Kingfisher at a glance
04 Chairman’s statement
05 Chief Executive’s statement
06 Strategy: Creating the Leader
16 Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
17 Financial review
25 Risks
Governance
28 Board of Directors
30 Senior management
31 Directors’ report
34 Corporate governance
45 Directors’ remuneration report
Accounts
60 Consolidated income statement
61 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
62 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
63 Consolidated balance sheet
64 Consolidated cash flow statement
65 Notes to the consolidated financial statements
99 Independent auditors’ report to the members
of Kingfisher plc
100 Company balance sheet
101 Notes to the Company financial statements
113 Independent auditors’ report to the members
of Kingfisher plc
114 Group five year financial summary
115 Shareholder information
Contribution to Group sales (bn)
France £4.2bn 39%
UK & Ireland £4.3bn 41%
Other international* £2.1bn 20%
£10.6bn
Contribution to Group retail pro?t (m)
France £397m 51%
UK & Ireland £234m 30%
Other international £150m 19%
£781m
Property (at market value) (bn)
France £1.5bn 42%
UK & Ireland £0.9bn 25%
Other international* £1.2bn 33%
£3.6bn
* Excludes Turkey.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
2
BUSINESS REVIEW
Kingfisher at a glance
Our purpose
To make it easier for customers to have better and more sustainable homes
This approach will unlock more customer demand and grow our business to the benefit of all our stakeholders, creating a more
valuable business for our shareholders, a better partner for our suppliers, a more secure and brighter future for our colleagues
and a more sustainable business for our local communities.
Our key figures
Total sales Adjusted
pre-tax profit
Employees Stores
£10.6bn £715m 78,000 1,025
Our brands
B&Q is the largest
home improvement and
garden centre retailer in
the UK with 358 stores
across the UK and
Ireland offering around
40,000 products for the
homemaker, occasional
to serious DIYers, and
trade professionals.
In China, the business
is adapted to the
local preference for a
“Do-it-for-Me” model.
It specialises in the
fitting out and decoration
of new apartments.
With up to 50,000
products under one
roof, Castorama France
is one of the leading
home improvement
retailers in France with
103 stores. Like B&Q,
Castorama targets retail
customers and DIYers
and has an emphasis on
style and inspiration for
homemakers. In Poland
and Russia there is a
bigger emphasis on
projects, as the home
improvement market
is at an earlier stage of
its development.
In both France and
Spain Brico Dépôt is
primarily aimed at serious
DIYers and professional
builders. It operates a
low-price format which
offers customers a
choice of 10,000
products available in
larger product quantities.
Screwfix is the UK’s
largest omnichannel
supplier of trade tools,
accessories and hardware
to trade professionals and
serious DIY enthusiasts.
In addition to its catalogue
and website, Screwfix
operates 275 stores
across the UK.
Koçta s¸, Kingfisher’s
joint venture in Turkey,
is now the number one
home improvement
retailer in the country.
Its 37 stores are
aimed at mainstream
consumers, homemakers
and occasional to
serious DIYers.
For our European Home Report, a survey of 15,000
households and their attitudes to home improvement, visit
www.kingfisher.com/EuropeanHomeReport
Operating Countries
Joint Venture (Koc¸ tas¸)
Strategic Alliance (Hornbach)
Our operating countries
3
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Our markets
France
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
France 63 27 1 +0.5% 103 1,085 11,139
104 576 6,819
UK & Ireland
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
UK 62 27 1 +0.9 358
†
2,561
†
21,473
‡
275 20 3,804
Ireland 5 1.7 – +1.4
Other International
Country
Population
(m)*
Households
(m)*
Market
position
GDP growth
2013 estimated
(%)
§
Market
brand
Store
numbers
Selling space
(‘000s sq m)
Employees
(full time
equivalent)
Poland 38 14 1 +1.5 65 487 10,576
5 26 361
China 1,354 393 – +8.0 39 326 4,449
Spain 45 18 2 -1.2 20 116 992
Russia 140 53 3 +2.8 19 170 2,483
Turkey 76 19 1 +4.5 37 194 3,240
Total 1,025 5,561 65,336
Store numbers, selling space and employee data as at
2 February 2013.
* The Economist Pocket World in Figures 2013. † Including Ireland (9 stores).
§ Credit Suisse. ‡ Including Ireland and Kingfisher Future Homes.
Kingfisher Group Executive
Kingfisher’s Group Executive team meets monthly and is responsible for the overall strategic decision-making of the Group. It is
supported by the Group Operating Board and the One Team Board, more information about which can be found on page 30.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief
Executive
Guy Colleau
CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and
Koçta s¸ brands
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama
and Brico
Dépôt brands
Steve Willett
CEO, Group
Productivity
and Development
Karen Witts
Group Finance
Director
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
4
BUSINESS REVIEW
Chairman’s statement
It has been a challenging year for
Kingfisher, but I am pleased to report that
we finished the year in good shape, with
a strong balance sheet, higher market
share in Europe and with our medium
term programme of self-help initiatives
(Creating the Leader) progressing well.
Our reported results were affected by
adverse currency movements, and the
particularly poor summer weather in
Northern Europe literally dampened
customer demand during our peak
season. Add to this the economic
uncertainty our customers are facing
across Europe and it is no surprise that
2012 was difficult for retailers in general.
But our teams have worked hard, actively
managing the business, focusing on
improving our customer offer and
optimising our cash generation in these
difficult markets. These are the right
things to do to ensure we can deliver
value for shareholders over the medium
term. We achieved growth in France, our
most significant market, and continued to
expand in Poland, Russia, Turkey and
Spain. Whilst B&Q found the UK
consumer market difficult, our trade
businesses in the UK, Screwfix and
TradePoint, grew strongly. We remain
confident in our future prospects and it is
for this reason that we are proposing to
raise the dividend by 7.0% despite
adjusted pre-tax profits being down
11.4% to £715m.
We have also continued to make good
progress on our sustainability agenda,
with the launch in October of our Net
Positive plan. You can read more
about Net Positive on page 16.
I would like to welcome two new directors
who joined the Board in October. Karen
Witts joined as Group Finance Director
and brings with her a wealth of financial
and operational management experience
from her previous roles at Vodafone and
BT, among others. Philippe Tible, a
highly experienced retailer, who is
responsible for our Castorama and Brico
Dépôt brands across Europe, also joined
the board. Euan Sutherland stepped
down from the Board in January to take
up a CEO role outside the Group and we
wish him well in his new position.
I would like to thank our 78,000 staff for
their hard work and commitment during
these difficult economic times. They have
done an excellent job providing the level
of service which customers expect and
ensuring that we start the new year
with confidence.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
Key highlights
£715m
Adjusted pre-tax profit
£691m
Pre-tax profit
22.3p
Adjusted basic EPS
24.1p
Basic EPS
9.46p
Full year dividend
“
OUR TEAMS HAVE WORKED HARD, ACTIVELY
MANAGING THE BUSINESS, FOCUSING ON
IMPROVING OUR CUSTOMER OFFER AND
OPTIMISING OUR CASH GENERATION IN
THESE DIFFICULT MARKETS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
5
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Chief Executive’s statement
As the Chairman says in his review, it
has been a tough year for Kingfisher, with
currency movements, weather and weak
consumer markets providing significant
headwinds for our businesses. But I am
pleased that the hard work of our teams
and our firm focus on our well established
programme of self-help initiatives, including
cost efficiencies and sourcing gains, helped
offset some of these headwinds and
enabled us to end the year in good shape.
We continued to actively manage the
business, generating cash and a positive
economic profit whilst successfully
delivering the first year of our Creating the
Leader programme, which is designed to
increase shareholder value over the
medium-term.
We made good progress on the four key
areas of this programme: Easier, Common,
Expand and One Team. This Annual
Report includes many examples of the key
milestones we achieved in the year but a
few worthy of particular note include:
Increased investment in online
retailing. Screwfix launched a mobile
‘click, pay & collect’ service for
customers and has developed a Group
omnichannel platform that has enabled
B&Q’s TradePoint business to launch a
transactional website. A lot of work also
went into preparing for the launch of a
new and improved online offer for
B&Q later in 2013.
Grown the amount of product that is
sourced direct from suppliers around
the world using our global network of
sourcing offices. Particularly strong
growth in direct sourced product was
achieved in our developing markets,
Poland, Russia, Turkey and China.
We also achieved our target of sharing
more of our best own brand products
across our businesses.
Opened 70 net new stores during
the year in markets where economic
returns are attractive, including 60 new
Screwfix units in the UK. We revamped
and extended five Castorama stores in
France and are trialling a new format
store in China targeting the Do-it-for-
Me apartment design market.
Worked more closely together as a
networked organisation. We have
now launched the Kingfisher ‘One
Academy’ with the aim of attracting
and developing a top team of the best
talent in international retailing. We also
launched Kingfisher’s Net Positive
sustainability strategy. Our aim is to go
beyond simply being ‘neutral’ or doing
less harm, towards making a net
positive contribution. Our focus is on
four areas: timber, energy, innovation
and communities and I am convinced
that this approach is vital as businesses
must be a force for good in society.
During the year we developed the wider
management team, mostly through
internal promotion, adding Steve Willett
and Guy Colleau to the Group Executive
team. Steve takes on responsibility
for our omnichannel activities as well as
overseeing Group productivity. Steve’s
previous role as CEO of Screwfix makes
him ideally suited to this role. Guy, who
was previously CEO of Castorama France,
takes on responsibility for driving our
product agenda across our businesses.
So, in summary, it was a tough year but
we ended it in good shape, with a strong
balance sheet and with our Creating the
Leader programme well underway. We
will continue with this programme in
the coming year and later in this Annual
Report you will find more details of the
key activities we have planned.
Although the economic background
remains challenging, I believe Kingfisher
continues to have excellent prospects as
we work towards our aim of making it
easier for customers to have better,
more sustainable homes.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
“
I BELIEVE KINGFISHER CONTINUES TO
HAVE EXCELLENT PROSPECTS AS WE WORK
TOWARDS OUR AIM OF MAKING IT EASIER
FOR CUSTOMERS TO HAVE BETTER,
MORE SUSTAINABLE HOMES.
”
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
To watch a video interview with
Ian Cheshire, go to
www.kingfisher.com/IanCheshirePrelims13
CREATING
THE
LEADER
OUR PURPOSE IS TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR
CUSTOMERS TO HAVE BETTER AND MORE
SUSTAINABLE HOMES
6
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
7
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Our markets
We currently operate in eight countries,
spanning over 500 million households.
Our research shows that spending on
home improvement is a key priority for
householders, making this an attractive
sector for retailers. It’s also attractive
because of the relatively small
number of well-known manufacturer
brands. This means a specialist home
improvement retailer provides a vital
role for the consumer by offering a
wide product choice and expert
advice. They can offer a high
proportion of ‘own brand’ product,
achieve economies of scale and have a
more defensible position against online
or generalist operators when compared
with other retail segments.
Strategy
Our unique contribution as a business
to our customers is that we can
harness our home improvement
experience, our heritage as a leader
in sustainability and our international
scale and sourcing capability to bring
new, more sustainable and more
affordable products to market.
By also providing our customers
with project advice and new shopping
channels to complement our stores,
we will make it easier for them to
adapt their homes to their evolving
needs. Our shorthand for describing
this purpose is ‘Better Homes,
Better Lives’.
The current phase of our development
towards this vision – Creating the
Leader – builds on the success of
‘Delivering Value’, our previous
four-year growth plan, which
has repositioned Kingfisher as a
stronger business in the attractive
home improvement market.
Creating the Leader: self-help initiatives
Four themes Eight steps Success measures
EASIER 1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
For more information see page 09.
• Like-for-like sales growth (LFL)
• Unique web users
COMMON 3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
For more information see page 11.
• 35% of Group sales direct sourced
• 50% of all product sales to be common
• Retail profit margin
EXPAND 5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
For more information see page 13.
• Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)*
* For definition of KEP see page 21.
ONE TEAM
7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
For more information see page 15.
• Group employee engagement scores
• Net Positive dashboard
Financial benefits
Predicting future potential retail profit benefits from this strategy, when we don’t know the economic conditions or
competitive landscape we will face in the future is very difficult. However, whatever the conditions, we believe our efforts will
drive higher LFL sales, higher gross margin and more cost efficiencies than would have been delivered without this strategy.
In 2011/12 we estimated that this would create an additional £300 million of annualised retail profit in the fifth year, net of
price reinvestment and based on the size of the business and market conditions at that time.
For more information on how our strategy is linked to Risk reporting and Remuneration see pages 25 and 45 respectively.
7
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
AFFORDABLE
CONVENIENT
A
D
V
I
C
E
ACCESSIBLE
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
CREATING
THE
LEADER
EASIER
8
9
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Key steps
1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Completed UK roll out of DIY
training classes
Launched B&Q YouTube channel
Trialling new formats in France,
UK, Turkey, Russia & China
Preparing for the UK’s ‘Green Deal’
Launched Screwfix mobile
‘click, pay & collect’ offer
Developed a Group
omnichannel platform,
implemented first in ‘TradePoint’
Upgrading B&Q’s online offer
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Emphasise our affordability credentials
Launch ‘Handy Prices’ marketing
campaign in B&Q
Roll out Brico Dépôt ‘back to basics’
marketing campaign
Extend Brico Dépôt France & Spain
programme of ‘arrivages’ (one off
special buys) to Turkey & Poland
Launch UK Enterprise Finance
Guarantee scheme for tradesmen
Extend our omnichannel offer:
Launch upgraded B&Q online offer
(www.diy.com)
Extend TradePoint website to main
shop floor categories
Launch upgraded websites in
Poland, Turkey, China, Brico Dépôt
France & Spain
Trial ‘click & collect’ in Castorama
France & Turkey
TradePoint launches new transactional
website (driven by Screwfix know-how)
Over 1 million hits for B&Q’s ‘You Can Do It’
YouTube channel
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
5
1
9
Unique web users (m)
Monthly Moving Annual Average
-2.9%
+1.3%
+23%
12/13
11/12
Like-for-like sales
WORLD’S BEST
PRODUCTS
LOCAL MARKETS
L
O
C
A
L
T
A
S
T
E
CHOICE
CREATING
THE
LEADER
COMMON
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
10
11
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Key steps
3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
19% of sales direct sourced
8% of sales common
Direct sourcing in our developing
markets up 63% (Poland, Russia,
Turkey & China)
Opened new direct sourcing office
in Turkey
Extended ‘Trade’ common own
brands in Screwfix & Brico Dépôt
Launched new tiling range in B&Q
UK & Ireland
Developed a stock forecasting
& replenishment IT solution,
successfully rolled out in B&Q UK
& Ireland and Poland
Driven Group-wide cost efficiencies
through GNFR (Goods not for resale)
savings from European-wide supply
negotiations & SAP contract
renegotiated on a Group-wide basis
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Product:
Launch energy-efficiency ‘iQE’
Group brand
Roll out ‘Colours’ Group own-brand
paint into Russia & Spain
Roll out new coloured emulsion
paint range in B&Q UK &
Castorama France
Launch exclusive Valspar mixing
desk paint into B&Q UK & Ireland
& China
Full launch of ‘Site’ workwear into
Brico Dépôt
First UK & France product show
Efficiency:
Upweighted distribution centre
capability in Poland, Spain & Turkey
Roll out France & Spain staff bonus
programmes to Poland (linked to
individual store sales & profit growth)
Brico Dépôt’s ‘Energer’ hand & power tool
range launched in Screwfix
New tiling range launched in B&Q UK
& Ireland (higher commonality with
Castorama France)
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
Common product sales
% of total sales
Products direct sourced
% of total sales
Retail pro?t margin (%)
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
2
8
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
5
1
9
8
.
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
7
.
4
GROWTH
HIGHER
RETURNS
T
R
A
D
E
FLEXIBILITY
AMBITION
CREATING
THE
LEADER
EXPAND
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
12
Key steps
5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Opened 70 net new stores
(UK 61
(1)
, France 2, Poland 3,
Russia 1, Turkey 1, Spain 3 &
China 1 closure)
Revamped & extended 5
Castorama France stores
Successfully integrated 28 Focus
DIY stores in the UK
Launching a 4,000m2 standalone
B&Q Design Centre trial store
in China
B&Q UK store rightsizing; 1 B&Q UK
store reduced in size by 50% in deal
completed with a supermarket group
(1) 60 Screwfix outlets & 1 B&Q.
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Open 68 net new stores (UK 50
Screwfix outlets, France 5, Poland 2,
Russia 1, Turkey 4 & Spain 6,
representing 3% space growth
Revamp & extend four
Castorama France stores
Evaluate Screwfix
international opportunities
Screwfix accelerates store opening
programme with 60 new stores
New format stores opened in France.
C’est Castoche!
Kingfisher’s 1,000th home improvement
store opened, in Lublin, Poland
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
Measures
King?sher Economic Pro?t (KEP)*(£m)
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
3
1
4
4
* For de?nition of KEP see page 21.
13
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
DEVELOPING
LEADERS
CONNECTING
PEOPLE
ENGAGEMENT
FORCE
FOR GOOD NET
POSITIVE
T
A
L
E
N
T
CREATING
THE
LEADER
ONE TEAM
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
14
Key steps
7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
Milestones
PROGRESS DURING 2012/13
Broadened the Group
Executive Team with two internal
appointments (Guy Colleau as CEO,
Group Sourcing & Offer; Steve Willett
as CEO, Group Productivity
& Development)
Launched the Kingfisher ‘One
Academy’ (a virtual academy
for the top 250 managers)
Launched our new sustainability
plan, Net Positive, and
associated dashboard
Our aim is to give back more
than we take in the course of
our operations
Our four priority areas are
Timber, Energy, Innovation and
Communities (see page 16)
TARGETS DURING 2013/14
Continue to extend the Kingfisher
‘One Academy’
Net Positive dashboard to be
updated annually
The Kingfisher ‘One Academy’ launched
for top 250 managers
Kingfisher launches new ambition to
become Net Positive (kids’ DIY classes
launched in Poland)
For the case studies, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/
2012-13
15
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Measures
Engagement scores
Gallup Q12 survey (out of 5)*
Sales of products with eco-credentials
(% of total sales)**
Sales of products with
eco-credentials: £2.1bn
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
4
.
3
4
.
1
* A GrandMean score above 4 out of 5 is ‘best in class’.
** For our Group performance summary go to www.king?sher.com/netpositive.
Total sales: £10.6bn
20%
of total sales
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
16
BUSINESS REVIEW
Sustainability: becoming Net Positive
KINGFISHER LAUNCHED NET POSITIVE IN 2012, WITH AN AMBITION TO CONTRIBUTE
POSITIVELY TO SOME OF THE BIG CHALLENGES FACING THE WORLD, WHILE CREATING
A MORE VALUABLE AND SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS FOR OUR STAKEHOLDERS.
Introduction
Net Positive is a new approach to doing
business for Kingfisher. It means going
beyond achieving zero impact,
and committing to make a positive
contribution across four priority
areas: Timber, Energy, Innovation and
Communities. In practice it means:
not just preventing deforestation but
working towards net reforestation; helping
to create homes that are generators of
their own energy; innovating products
and services that are restorative by
design; and working in communities to
connect people and equip them with
practical skills.
Net Positive underpins Kingfisher’s
Creating the Leader strategy. It will help
us secure resources, unlock opportunities
for growth, inspire our people, and be
a catalyst for collaboration.
In each of our priority areas we will
transform the way Kingfisher operates
to become Net Positive by 2050 (see
chart below). We will take what we learn
and integrate it across our business.
Progress will be reported via our Net
Positive dashboard.
Timber
Deforestation and rising demand
means wood prices could increase by
30-75% by 2020. To maintain access to
affordable supplies we need to protect
and improve forests.
Our aspiration is that by 2050 we will
create more forest than we use. We are
aiming for all timber and paper in our
operations, products, packaging and
construction to be responsibly sourced by
2020. Our companies such as B&Q UK
and Brico Dépôt Spain are starting
local forest projects that benefit the
environment and economy, and create
local sustainable timber supplies.
For the products we sold in 2012/13,
89% of the timber (by volume) was
responsibly sourced, compared with
86% in 2011/12.
Energy
With super energy-efficient products and
tools and materials for eco-retrofits and
micro-generation, we can help customers
save money and improve their homes.
The market for in-home energy efficiency
is predicted to be €70bn by 2020 across
our European markets.
Our aspiration is that by 2050 every
Kingfisher store and customer home is
zero carbon or generates more energy
than it consumes. Over the past two
years, sales of energy-saving products
helped our customers save over 5 TWh
in energy use. Our target is 38 TWh by
2020 – equivalent to the annual energy
consumption of every house in Scotland
(2.3 million homes).
We reduced our absolute carbon
footprint (emissions from property energy
use, dedicated delivery fleets and business
travel by road) by 3% compared with
2010/11, towards our target of a 25%
reduction by 2020, which helps to reduce
operating costs.
Innovation
Switching to more sustainable materials
and business models, and designing out
waste through closed loop systems,
generates value for our business and
customers. Our aspiration is that by 2050
every Kingfisher product will enable a
more sustainable and ultimately Net
Positive lifestyle, so that creating and
using products will waste nothing.
We have set a target to offer 1,000
different products with closed-loop
credentials by 2020, and we are working
towards this with partners such as the
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Many
products already have closed loop
credentials, such as B&Q’s New Life
Paint made from waste paint.
This builds on our track record in eco-
product innovation. During 2012/13
products with eco-credentials accounted
for 20% of retail sales (see page 15) and
we aim for 50% by 2020. ‘Best-in-class’,
our most innovative eco-products,
accounted for 5% of sales.
Communities
In local communities we have seen a
decline in the practical skills of making
and mending. Equipping people with
these skills is good for individuals and
communities and will help galvanise
potential customers.
Our aspiration is that every Kingfisher
store and location supports projects
which build local communities or equip
people with skills. By 2020, our target is
to have completed 4,000 community
projects that deliver our ‘Better Homes,
Better Lives’ purpose. In 2012/13 we
launched free DIY classes for school
children in Castorama Poland, a fun way
to learn about DIY and the environment.
For further information visit
www.kingfisher.com/netpositive
Our current progress on our Net Positive journey
Conventional
approach to date
1990 2050 Net Positive journey
Pioneering Net
Positive projects
Net Positive
tipping point
Net Positive
17
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review
Financial Summary
A summary of the reported financial results for the year ended
2 February 2013 is set out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
(Decrease)/
increase
Sales 10,573 10,831 (2.4)%
Adjusted pre-tax profit 715 807 (11.4)%
Profit before taxation after
exceptional items 691 797 (13.3)%
Adjusted basic earnings per share 22.3p 25.1p (11.2)%
Dividends 9.46p 8.84p 7.0%
A reconciliation of statutory profit to adjusted profit is set
out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
(Decrease)/
increase
Profit before taxation 691 797 (13.3)%
Exceptional items 26 12 116.7%
Profit before exceptional items
and taxation 717 809 (11.4)%
Financing fair value
remeasurements (2) (2) –
Adjusted pre-tax profit 715 807 (11.4)%
Profit and EPS including all exceptional items for the year ended
2 February 2013 are set out below:
2012/13 2011/12 Decrease
Profit after tax 564 639 (11.7)%
Basic EPS 24.1p 27.5p (12.4)%
Overview
The Group’s financial reporting year ends on the nearest
Saturday to 31 January. The current year is for the 53 weeks
ended 2 February 2013 with the comparative financial year
being for the 52 weeks ended 28 January 2012. This only
impacts the UK & Ireland businesses with all of the other
businesses reporting on a calendar basis as a result of local
requirements. The effect of the 53
rd
week on the results of the
Group is the inclusion of an additional £72m sales and an
immaterial benefit to retail profit.
Total sales grew by 0.5% on a constant currency 52 week basis
and declined by 2.4% to £10.6 billion (2011/12: £10.8 billion)
on a reported rate basis. On a like-for-like basis, Group sales
were down 2.9% (2011/12: +1.3%). During the year, a net
additional 69 new stores were opened, including 60 Screwfix
outlets, taking the store network to 988 stores (excluding 37
Turkey JV stores).
Retail profit before exceptional items declined by £101 million
to £781 million (2011/12: £882 million) including a £39 million
adverse foreign exchange movement representing a 7.3%
decline on a constant currency basis. This decline was as
a result of challenging trading conditions and unfavourable
weather patterns. Including exceptional items, retail profit
declined by 13.2% to £755 million (2011/12: £870 million).
The net interest charge for the year was £4 million, down
£6 million on the prior period. A breakdown of this is
shown below.
Profit before tax declined by 13.3% to £691 million. After
removing the impact of exceptional items and fair value
remeasurements, adjusted pre-tax profit declined by
11.4% to £715 million.
Profit after tax for the period was £564 million (2011/12: £639
million). This resulted in the Group recording a basic EPS of
24.1p in the year (2011/12: 27.5p).
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
To watch a video interview with Karen Witts, go to
www.kingfisher.com/KarenWittsPrelims13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
18
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Trading Review by Major Geography
France
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
% LFL
Change
France 4,194 4,470 (6.2)% 0.3% (1.6)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
France 397 423 (6.3)% 0.2%
France includes Castorama and Brico Dépôt.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies.
Kingfisher France
Kingfisher France sales grew by 0.3% to £4.2 billion (-1.6% LFL)
in slower markets. Two net new stores were opened and five
were revamped, adding around 2% new space.
Retail profit grew by 0.2%, broadly in line with sales growth.
Gross margins were up 10 basis points reflecting on-going self-
help initiatives offsetting some investment in pricing. Costs were
tightly controlled and also reflect lower levels of variable pay
during the year.
Castorama total sales grew by 2.0% to £2.3 billion
(-0.5% LFL). According to Banque de France data, sales for
the home improvement market were down 0.8%. Castorama
outperformed the market benefiting from its innovative ‘Do-it-
Smart’ approach aimed at making home improvement projects
easier for customers.
Brico Dépôt, which more specifically targets trade professionals
and heavy DIYers, was impacted by a slower house building
market, with new housing starts and planning consent data
(1)
down around 18% and 9% respectively. Total sales declined by
1.7% to £1.9 billion (-2.8% LFL). Self-help initiatives progressed
well, including new ranges introduced last year (e.g. heating
and joinery ranges) and more ‘arrivages’ promotions (rolling
programmes of one-off special buys), reinforcing Brico Dépôt’s
value credentials.
(1)
Ministry of Housing February 2012-January 2013.
UK & Ireland
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Currency
Change 52
week basis
(1)
% LFL
Change
UK &
Ireland 4,316 4,338 (0.5)% (2.0)% (5.2)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
UK &
Ireland 234 271 (13.7)% (13.8)%
UK & Ireland includes B&Q in the UK & Ireland and Screwfix in the UK.
(1) In the UK & Ireland Kingfisher reports each financial year up to
the nearest Saturday to 31 January. This year this has resulted in
a 53 week year.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies and % movements on
a 52 week basis.
Kingfisher UK & Ireland
Kingfisher UK & Ireland total sales were down 2.0% to £4.3
billion (-5.2% LFL) in a declining market impacted by weak
consumer confidence and record adverse summer weather.
Retail profit declined by 13.8% to £234 million.
B&Q UK & Ireland’s total sales were down 3.6% (-5.6% LFL)
to £3.7 billion reflecting the difficult UK backdrop and a
particularly challenging environment in Ireland, where our nine
stores incurred losses of £7 million and are now subject to an
Examinership process.
The market
(1)
for the UK’s leading home improvement retailers
was down around 3%, including seasonal ranges down 9%.
On a comparable basis, B&Q outperformed the market, with
sales down around 2%.
Sales of outdoor seasonal products were down around 9%
with average footfall down 20% in the severely weather-affected
weeks. Sales of building products were also impacted by the
adverse weather. Sales of indoor decorative products fared
better as customers switched some of their home improvement
activities indoors. Cash sales
(2)
of showroom (kitchens,
bathrooms and bedrooms) products were slightly higher year
on year, showing that the new Every Day Low Prices (EDLP)
trading strategy in this category is starting to gain traction with
customers in a challenging market.
Retail profit declined by 20.8% to £187 million. Gross margins
were down 20 basis points, with the benefits from ongoing self-
help initiatives offset by some additional promotional activity, the
decision to accelerate clearance ahead of the national rollout of
new ranges of tiling and décor products, and a higher mix of
‘TradePoint’ sales.
19
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
TradePoint continues to progress well. Sales to TradePoint
customers were up around 20% and now account for nearly
20% of total store sales. Over 1.2 million customers have now
registered as TradePoint customers, with around a third having
shopped in the last month.
A strong focus on operating cost efficiencies continued. Costs
also reflect lower levels of variable pay this year and the benefit
of a settlement of a one-off construction related claim for around
£5 million.
Screwfix grew total sales by 9.8% to £577 million, despite the
challenging smaller tradesman market
(3)
, benefiting from the
continued rollout of new outlets, the success of ‘click, pay &
collect’ and a redesigned catalogue. Sixty new outlets were
opened, taking the total to 275.
Retail profit was up 33.9% to £47 million, reflecting the strong
sales growth, gross margins benefiting from on-going self-help
initiatives and continued tight cost control.
UK reporting
B&Q and Screwfix are increasingly operating together, sharing a
distribution network, jointly developing several major initiatives,
including omnichannel, the provision of energy efficiency
products and services and adopting a complementary strategy
for UK growth. As a result, from next year (2013/14) reporting
in the UK will mirror our current practice in France and provide
one overall profit figure along with a commentary on the sales
performance of each major business.
(1) Kingfisher estimate for the UK RMI (Repairs, Maintenance &
Improvement) market – incorporates GfK data, which includes
new space but which excludes B&Q Ireland and private retailers
e.g. IKEA, and other smaller independents. It is on a cash sales
basis and is adjusted for discounts.
(2) Cash sales are recognised as sales when the products are delivered
to the customer.
(3) Based on the Builders’ Merchants Federation lightside data Jan-Dec
2012 and includes new space, down 0.4%.
Other International
Sales £m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
% LFL
Change
Other
International 2,063 2,023 2.0% 6.6% (0.7)%
Retail profit
£m 2012/13 2011/12
% Reported
Change
% Constant
Change
Other
International 150 188 (19.8)% (14.3)%
Other International includes Poland, China, Spain, Russia, Turkey JV and
Hornbach in Germany.
Joint Venture (Koçtas¸ JV) and Associate (Hornbach) sales are not consolidated.
All trading commentary below is in constant currencies.
Other International total sales increased by 6.6% to
£2.1 billion (-0.7% LFL) supported by new store openings and
strong growth in Russia, now the second largest business in
the division. However, with the exception of Russia, economic
uncertainty in Europe impacted LFL sales and profitability.
Retail profit declined by 14.3% to £150 million.
During the year seven net new stores were opened adding
around 3% new space. Three stores were opened in both
Poland and Spain, one in both Russia and Turkey and one
store rationalisation in China.
In Poland and Spain sales grew reflecting new store space,
however both markets were impacted by weak consumer
confidence. Sales in Poland were up 0.6% (-5.1% LFL) to
£1,029 million. Gross margins were down 110 basis points, with
self-help initiatives offset by some investment in pricing. Tight
cost control more than offset cost inflation resulting in a 15.3%
decline in retail profit to £107 million. Sales in Spain grew by
3.0% (-6.8% LFL) to £234 million. Retail profit was £1 million,
down from £7 million reported last year, reflecting the difficult
market and higher pre-opening costs after the resumption of
new store openings.
In Russia sales grew by 38.3% in a strong market to £426 million
(+17.9% LFL) benefiting from new store openings. Retail profit
was £16 million, compared to £2 million reported in 2011/12.
In Turkey, Kingfisher’s 50% JV, Koçta s¸, grew sales by 4.1%
(-4.1% LFL) reflecting one new store opening offset by a slower
economic environment and the impact of poor weather early in
the year. Retail profit contribution was £9 million, down 28.2%
year on year.
Hornbach, in which Kingfisher has a 21% economic interest,
contributed £26 million to retail profit, down 15.2% on last year
reflecting a £5 million loss in Q1 and a weaker market in Q4.
B&Q China sales declined by 0.8% (+0.1% LFL) to £374 million
reflecting one less store compared to last year. The retail loss
was £9 million (2011/12: £3 million reported loss) after reflecting
around £3 million of costs relating to the new format store trial.
Interest
Net interest has decreased by £6 million in the year. The
breakdown is as follows:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Underlying net interest (6) (12)
Financing fair value remeasurements (FFVR)
(1)
2 2
Statutory net interest (4) (10)
(1) FFVR represents changes in the fair value of financing derivatives,
excluding interest accruals, offset by fair value adjustments to the
carrying value of borrowings and other hedged items under fair value
hedge relationships.
Underlying net interest has fallen by £6 million driven by a fall in
interest on net debt as a result of the repayment of €200 million
(£162 million) EMTN
(2)
in November 2012 and from a full year’s
benefit of buying back debt in 2011/12. This was offset by an
increase in the net pensions interest cost, principally due to a
reduction in the asset return assumption.
(2) Euro Medium Term Note.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
20
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Taxation
Kingfisher’s effective tax rate is sensitive to the blend of tax rates
and profits in the Group’s various jurisdictions. The adjusted
effective rate of tax, calculated on profit before exceptional
items, prior year tax adjustments and the impact of rate
changes is 27% (2011/12: 28%). This is higher than the UK
statutory rate because of the amount of Group profit that is
earned in higher tax jurisdictions and because no future benefit
is assumed for losses incurred in overseas jurisdictions such
as China and Ireland. The overall tax rate for the year is 18%
(2011/12: 20%) reflecting the impact on deferred tax of the
further 2% fall in the UK rate, release of prior year provisions
either reassessed or time expired and a claim for the use of
prior year losses of £33 million.
Effective tax rate
calculation
Profit
£m
Tax
£m
2012/13
%
2011/12
%
Profit before tax and tax
thereon 691 127 18 20
Add exceptional loss
and tax thereon 26 1
Less prior year items – 66
Total – adjusted 717 194 27 28
The effective rate of tax is lower than in 2011/12 as a result of
tax rate changes in some of the countries in which we operate.
The most significant changes were the UK statutory tax rate
falling from 26% to 24% offset by increased levels of costs for
which no tax relief is available in France.
The tax rates for this financial year and the expected rates for
next year are as follows:
Jurisdiction
Statutory tax rate
2013/14
Statutory tax rate
2012/13
UK 23% 24%
France 34.4% – 36.1% 34.4% – 36.1%
Poland 19% 19%
Rest of Europe 0% – 34% 0% – 34%
Asia 16.5% – 25% 16.5% – 25%
Tax contribution
Kingfisher makes a major contribution to the economies of each
country in which it operates including the taxes that it both pays
to and collects for governments. The Group has borne cash
taxes on its profits, properties, in employing its workforce, in
environmental levies, in customs and fuel duties as well as
bearing other local taxes. The level of corporate income tax
paid is detailed in the consolidated cash flow statement,
whilst further information regarding the corporate income
tax expense is contained within note 9. The most significant
of the taxes collected are sales taxes charged to customers
(VAT) on their purchases and employee payroll taxes. Taxes
paid and taxes collected together represent Kingfisher’s total
tax contribution which is shown below:
2012/13
£bn
2011/12
£bn
Taxes borne 0.70 0.69
Taxes collected 0.90 0.89
Total tax contribution 1.60 1.58
Figure 1
Taxation governance and risk management
The Group’s Code of Conduct applies high standards of
professionalism and integrity as well as a requirement to comply
with applicable laws which underpins the Group’s approach to
tax governance. The Group employs appropriately qualified staff
who are responsible for ensuring tax compliance requirements
are met. Tax matters are reviewed by the Financial Initiatives
Tax and Treasury Committee. Further details of the governance
framework are contained within the Governance report.
Kingfisher’s tax strategy is to manage its tax affairs efficiently
and in a way which enhances shareholder value whilst
balancing the tax risks it faces. Tax risks can arise from changes
in law, differences in interpretation of law, changes in tax rates
and the failure to comply with the applicable tax laws and
associated procedures. The Group manages and controls these
risks through local management, its Group tax department and
appropriate advice from reputable professional firms. Where
disputes arise with the tax authorities, the Group addresses
the areas of dispute promptly in a professional, open and
constructive manner.
The Audit Committee and the main Board regularly review the
management and control of its tax affairs and related tax risks.
Exceptional items
2012/13
£m
(Charge)/
gain
2011/12
£m
(Charge)/
gain
Ireland restructuring (21) –
UK restructuring (16) 2
Net pension gain 11 –
UK ex-Focus stores acquisition integration – (11)
Loss on disposal of properties – (3)
(26) (12)
Tax on exceptional items 1 7
Net exceptional items (25) (5)
In the year the Group booked a net post-tax exceptional charge
of £25 million (2011/12: £5 million charge).
Total value of taxes borne
Employers
social security
Business rates
Corporation tax
Other taxes
(including
customs duty)
£0.7bn
21
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Following a sustained decline in trading at B&Q Ireland, the
Group undertook a detailed review of its Irish operations and as
a result, B&Q Ireland entered into an Examinership process in
January 2013. The £21 million restructuring charge represents
provisions recorded for the impairment of properties and
estimated costs of exiting leases and other closure activities.
Around £13 million of this cost will result in a cash outflow, of
which around £11 million will be in 2013/14.
The UK restructuring net charge of £16 million principally
reflects the streamlining of B&Q UK & Ireland’s store support
office and its kitchen, bathroom and bedroom business as well
as IT services. It also includes a £4 million release (2011/12:
£2 million) of an onerous property contract provision for idle
stores either sublet or exited in the period, which had previously
been included as part of the B&Q UK store closure and
downsizing programme in 2005/06.
Netted against these charges is a net pensions accounting
credit of £11 million (2011/12: £nil), see the pensions section
below for details.
Tax on exceptional items amounts to a credit of £1 million
(2011/12: £7 million credit).
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) have decreased by 12.4%
to 24.1p (2011/12: 27.5p). On a more comparable basis,
removing the impact of exceptional items, financing fair value
remeasurements and the effect of prior year tax adjustments,
adjusted basic earnings per share decreased by 11.2% to
22.3p (2011/12: 25.1p).
2012/13 2011/12
Basic earnings per share 24.1p 27.5p
Exceptional items 1.1p 0.5p
Financing fair value remeasurements (net of tax) (0.1)p (0.1)p
Impact of prior year items and exceptional items
on income tax (2.8)p (2.8)p
Adjusted earnings per share 22.3p 25.1p
Dividends
The Board has proposed a final dividend of 6.37p which results
in a full year dividend of 9.46p, an increase of 7.0% (2011/12:
8.84p). The final dividend reduces full year dividend cover on
adjusted earnings to 2.4 times (2011/12: 2.8 times).
Going forward the Group will aim to move towards a medium
term annual dividend cover of around 2.5 times. At this level,
the Board believes the dividend will continue to be prudently
covered by earnings and free cash flow and remain consistent
with the capital needs of the business.
From 2013/14 the Group will also move away from the
mechanistic calculation of the interim dividend as 35 per cent
of the previous year’s total dividends and instead set both
the interim and final dividend by reference to the current
year’s earnings.
The full year dividend will continue to be proposed each year
as part of the full year preliminary announcement in March.
The final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 will be
paid on 17 June 2013 to shareholders on the register at close of
business on 10 May 2013, subject to approval of shareholders
at the Annual General Meeting, to be held on 13 June 2013. A
dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) is available to shareholders
who would prefer to invest their dividends in the shares of the
Company. The shares will go ex-dividend on 8 May 2013. For
those shareholders electing to receive the DRIP the last date for
receipt of electing is 24 May 2013.
Economic Returns
Management are focused on Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
as our main measure of return on capital. KEP is derived from
the concept of Economic Value Added and is used to ensure
capital is being used productively and decisions made which
will create value for shareholders. KEP takes into account a
charge for the capital employed in the business. In doing this
the calculation treats leases as though they were owned assets
within capital employed, capitalising them using the long-term
yield methodology. For the purposes of the calculation, adjusted
post-tax profit is used, but interest and property lease costs are
added back. A charge for the cost of capital employed is then
deducted by applying the Group’s lease adjusted weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) to its lease and pension adjusted
capital employed.
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Decrease
£m
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP) 44 131 (87)
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
22
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Geographic divisional return
Kingfisher’s underlying KEP by geographic division is set out
below. The divisional invested capital excludes central goodwill
of £2.4 billion.
Returns £m KEP
Sales
£bn
Proportion
of Group
sales
%
Invested
Capital
(IC)
£bn
Proportion
of Group
IC% 2012/13 2011/12
UK 4.3 41% 6.0 48% (5) 32
France 4.2 39% 2.2 18% 150 166
Other
International 2.1 20% 1.4 12% 37 59
Goodwill &
Central n/a n/a 2.4 22% (138) (126)
Total 10.6 12.0 44 131
Free cash flow
A reconciliation of free cash flow and cash flow movement in net
debt/cash is set out below:
2012/13
£m
2011/12
£m
Operating profit (before exceptional items) 721 819
Other non-cash items
(1)
261 274
Change in working capital (178) (187)
Pensions and provisions (before exceptional items) (42) (54)
Operating cash flow 762 852
Net interest paid (4) (8)
Tax paid (129) (148)
Gross capital expenditure (before strategic investments) (316) (338)
Disposal of assets 17 9
Free cash flow 330 367
Dividends paid (221) (178)
Share purchase for employee incentive schemes – (117)
Strategic capex investments
(2)
– Freehold interests – (73)
– Ex-Focus DIY stores – (39)
Other
(3)
(10) (17)
Cash flow movement in net cash/(debt) 99 (57)
Opening net (debt)/cash (88) 14
Other movement including foreign exchange 27 (45)
Closing net cash/(debt) 38 (88)
(1) Includes depreciation and amortisation, impairment losses, share-based
compensation charge, share of post-tax results of JVs and associates,
pension service cost and profit/loss on retail disposals.
(2) Investments of a one-off nature, such as bolt on acquisitions and buy
outs of freeholds in existing leased stores.
(3) Includes dividends received from JVs and associates, business
acquisitions, issue of shares and exceptional items (excluding
property disposals).
Net cash at the end of the year was £38 million (2011/12:
£88 million net debt).
Free cash flow of £330 million was generated in the year,
a decline of £37 million year-on-year primarily due to the
reduced profit generation offset by lower capital expenditure.
During the year free cash flow generated was utilised to improve
shareholder returns with the dividend being increased to
£221 million.
In the prior year we invested additional funds outside of our
normal ‘free cash flow’ with £112 million allocated to strategic
capex investments and £117 million on acquiring our own
shares to match employee incentive schemes. The strategic
capex spend included £73 million in the UK where we had
actively decided to purchase freeholds already occupied and
£39 million on the acquisition of 29 Focus stores.
The Group will maintain a high focus on free cash flow
generation going forward to maintain its solid investment grade
balance sheet, fund investment where economic returns
are attractive and pay healthy dividends to shareholders.
Capital expenditure
Gross capital expenditure for the year was £316 million
(2011/12: £450 million). A total of £17 million of proceeds from
disposals were received during the year (2011/12: £9 million).
As detailed last year the Group has a rigorous approach to
capital allocation and authorisation. The process includes:
An annual strategic planning process based on detailed
medium term plans for all businesses for the next four years.
This process drives the key strategic capital allocation
decisions and the output is reviewed by the Board;
A capital approval process through a capital expenditure
committee, attended by the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, CEO Group Productivity and Development,
Group Property Director, Group General Counsel. The
committee is delegated to review all projects above £0.75
million and to sign-off the projects between £0.75 million
and £15.0 million (including the capitalised value of
lease commitments);
Projects above £15.0 million are required to be approved by
the Board although all projects above £0.75 million are also
notified to the Board;
Clear investment criteria including KEP and NPV (Net Present
Value) and challenging hurdle rates for IRR (Internal Rate of
Return) and DPB (Discounted PayBack);
An annual post-investment review process to undertake a
full assessment of all projects above £0.75 million which
were completed in the last two to four years. The findings of
this exercise are considered by both the capital expenditure
committee and the Board and used to inform the
assumptions for similar project proposals going forward.
An annual review of KEP by store is performed which drives
plans to improve the returns of weaker stores.
23
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Financial risk management
Kingfisher’s treasury function has primary responsibility for
managing certain financial risks to which the Group is exposed,
details of which are provided in note 24 of the accounts.
Management of balance sheet and liquidity risk
and financing
The Group finished the year with £38 million of net cash on the
balance sheet. However, the Group’s overall leverage is more
significant when including capitalised lease debt that in
accordance with accounting regulations does not appear on the
balance sheet. The ratio of the Group’s lease adjusted net debt
(capitalising leases at 8 times annual rent) to adjusted EBITDAR
is 2.4 times as at the year end. At this level the Group has
financial flexibility whilst retaining an efficient cost of capital.
A reconciliation of lease adjusted net debt to EBITDAR is set
out below.
2012/13
£m
EBITDA
(1)
987
Property operating lease rentals 435
EBITDAR 1,422
Financial (net cash) (38)
Pension position –
Property operating lease rentals (8x)
(2)
3,480
Lease adjusted net debt 3,442
Lease adjusted net debt to EBITDAR 2.4x
(1) Calculated as Retail profit less central costs and before depreciation
and amortisation.
(2) Kingfisher believes 8x is a reasonable industry standard for estimating the
economic value of its leased assets.
Kingfisher aims to maintain its solid investment grade
credit rating whilst investing in the business where economic
returns are attractive and paying a healthy annual dividend to
shareholders. After satisfying these key aims and taking into
account the economic and trading outlook any surplus capital
would be returned to shareholders.
Where appropriate Kingfisher may purchase current leasehold
assets used by the Group. This may increase financial debt but
should have no material impact on lease adjusted net debt.
Kingfisher regularly reviews the level of cash and debt facilities
required to fund its activities. This involves preparing a prudent
cash flow forecast for the next three years, determining the
level of debt facilities required to fund the business, planning
for repayments of debt at its maturity and identifying an
appropriate amount of headroom to provide a reserve
against unexpected outflows.
The Group derives around half its profit from the eurozone,
and as such is exposed to economic conditions in the member
states. The Group continues to monitor potential exposures and
risks, and develop effective risk management solutions.
Kingfisher has a £200 million committed bank facility maturing
in August 2016, which remained undrawn at the year end.
Kingfisher deposits surplus cash with a number of banks with
the strongest short-term credit ratings and with money market
funds which have the strongest, AAA, credit rating and offer
same day liquidity. A credit limit for each bank or fund is agreed
by the Board covering the full value of deposits and a proportion
of the value of derivative contracts. The credit risk is reduced
further by spreading the investments and derivative contracts
across several counterparties. At the year end, the Group had
a total of around £400 million of cash deposited with banks and
in money market funds. The highest single cash investment was
a £32 million money market fund investment.
The maturity profile of Kingfisher’s debt is illustrated at:
http://www.kingfisher.com/index.asp?pageid=76
The terms of the US Private Placement note agreement and
the committed bank facility require only that the ratio of Group
operating profit, excluding exceptional items, to net interest
payable must be no less than 3:1 for the preceding 12 months
at half year and full year ends. At the year end the Group’s ratio
was significantly higher than this requirement.
The Group has entered into interest rate derivative contracts
to convert the fixed rate payable on its bonds and US Private
Placement notes to a floating rate of interest. The floating
interest rates paid by the Group under its financing
arrangements are based on LIBOR and EURIBOR plus a
margin. The margins were not changed during the year.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
24
BUSINESS REVIEW
Financial Review continued
Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are:
To safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going
concern and retain financial flexibility in order to continue
to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other
stakeholders; and
To maintain a solid investment grade credit rating of BBB.
The Group manages its capital by:
Continued focus on free cash flow generation;
Setting the level of capital expenditure and dividend in the
context of current year and forecast free cash flow generation;
Rigorous review of capital investments and post investment
reviews to drive better returns; and
Monitoring the level of the Group’s financial and leasehold
debt in the context of Group performance and its credit rating.
Kingfisher Insurance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary, is
subject to minimum capital requirements as a consequence of
its insurance activities. The Group complied with the externally
imposed capital requirements during the year.
Property
The Group owns a significant property portfolio, most of which
is used for trading purposes. A valuation was performed for
internal purposes in November 2012 with over one-third of the
portfolio valued by external professional valuers where the key
assumption is the estimated yields. Based on this exercise the
value of this property is £3.6 billion at year end (2011/12: £3.5
billion). This is compared to the net book value of £2.9 billion
(2011/12: £2.8 billion) recorded in the financial statements.
Pensions
The approach used to prepare the pension valuation is in
line with current market practice and international accounting
standards, and has been applied consistently. This accounting
valuation is very sensitive to a number of assumptions and
market rates which are likely to fluctuate in the future. To aid
understanding of the impact that changes to the assumptions
could have on the reported UK pension surplus, we have
included sensitivity analysis as part of the pension disclosure
in note 27. Further details of key assumptions are also
contained within the note.
At the year end, the Group had a net position of £nil
(2011/12: £15 million deficit) in relation to defined benefit
pension arrangements of which a £71 million surplus
(2011/12: £25 million surplus) is in relation to its
UK Scheme.
The decrease in the net deficit was predominantly due to strong
asset returns, more than offsetting a lower real discount rate
used to value the UK pension obligation.
During the year, and following consultation with the active
members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed
to future benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012.
The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. A net
exceptional pensions accounting credit of £11 million has been
recognised. This includes a £27 million non-cash curtailment
gain, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities
as benefits are no longer linked to future salary increases other
than in line with inflation. It is offset by a £16 million charge for
transitional payments to the active members. From July 2012
an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered
to all UK employees, with the reduction in cash contributions
to the final salary scheme offset by higher contributions to the
defined contribution scheme. Auto-enrolment will commence
in the current year.
25
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
BUSINESS REVIEW
Risks
Given the scale of our businesses, the Board of Directors recognises that the nature, scope and potential impact of our key business
and strategic risks is subject to constant change. As such, the Board has implemented the necessary framework to ensure that it
has sufficient visibility of the Group’s key risks and the opportunity to regularly review the adequacy and effectiveness of our
mitigating controls and strategies.
During the year the Board has also considered the nature and level of risk that we are prepared to accept in order to deliver our
business strategies and have reviewed and approved our internal statement of risk appetite. This describes both the current and
desired levels of acceptable risk, supported by high level qualitative risk statements, ensuring that risks are proactively managed to
the level desired by the Board.
The Corporate governance report on page 42 describes the systems and processes through which the directors manage and
mitigate risks. The Board considers that the principal risks to achieving its strategic aims are set out below.
Easier
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Making it easier for
our customers to improve
their home
We fail to deliver demand and value
through the “easier” initiatives due to a
lack of rigorous change management
disciplines, capabilities and resources.
Across our markets we are committed to ensuring that our stores and online
fulfilment channels are aligned with our desire to optimise our customers’
retail experience. To support this we continue to evolve and innovate across
our product ranges, formats and customer offer.
Changes are, however, only implemented once we have completed an
appropriate level of planning and testing, relative to the risk, and we have
ensured that the assumptions and insight, that support the introduction of
new products or services, will deliver the benefits to both our customers and
our shareholders prior to their introduction.
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Giving our customers
more ways to shop
We fail to invest in the systems and
supply chain platforms necessary to
maintain either competitive parity or
advantage, amongst online or
omnichannel competitors.
Across our businesses we recognise both the threats and opportunities
presented by omnichannel retailing and are taking the necessary steps to
ensure we remain competitive in our respective markets. This is supported
by a significant investment programme across our systems and supply
chain architectures. This includes significant investments in:
Warehouse management, forecasting and replenishment technologies
to ensure we maximise operational agility and optimise the flow of product
in order to meet customer demand.
Optimising distribution and logistics platforms to ensure we can deliver
products via the most efficient routes to market.
The delivery of leading edge web architectures and platforms to provide
a compelling online offer including the options to deliver enhanced
‘click, pay and collect’ functionality, across smart phone and tablet
based applications.
Common
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Building innovative
common brands
We fail to unlock the potential to
generate further shareholder value
through the optimisation of combined
purchasing and commercial synergies,
while retaining accountability at our
Operating Companies.
The development of common brands and synergies remains a priority
across the organisation. To ensure that we maximise the opportunities
to deliver the differentiation of product ranges with competitors, through
innovative and exclusive product, and to increase and maximise scale
efficiencies we:
Are implementing high quality analytic technologies to ensure that we
understand our buying behaviours, habits and product insight across all
of our businesses and that we are able to identify specific opportunities
to drive the optimal, and most profitable, outcomes from our common
buying decisions.
Have set up a common projects team to identify the optimum
opportunities for implementing common products across the Group.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
26
BUSINESS REVIEW
Risks continued
Expand
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Growing our presence
in existing markets
Our investments in new store formats
and customer proposition strategies
fail to stimulate increased consumer
spend and do not deliver the desired
return to top line like-for-like growth
in our mature markets.
Uncertainty surrounding the resilience
of the global economy and volatility in
the Eurozone continues to impact both
consumer confidence and the long
term sustainability and capabilities of
our supplier base.
Despite the ongoing challenges of global austerity programmes and
their impact on consumer confidence, we are committed to re-investing
in our mature markets to maintain market share and to ensure
market leadership.
We continue to invest in our existing store portfolio whilst seeking to
minimise its cost base and optimise sales densities. Where there are
opportunities to expand and innovate we will do so using a combination
of existing and new formats, and try low risk market entry and new flexible
store format strategies based on the utilisation of current Operating
Company skills and resources.
With continuing market volatility and uncertainty across all of the
economies in which we operate, particularly within the Eurozone, we
continue to monitor potential exposures and risks and provide effective
risk management solutions to both our businesses and our strategic
suppliers. These include:
The provision of supply chain finance programmes to support
strategic suppliers.
Support from a strong portfolio of international banking partners with the
strongest short term credit rating that provide flexibility, diversification of
cash holdings, access to funding and reliable local retail cash and card
payment processing services.
An appropriate and prudent mix of hedging policies, cash deposits and
debt financing to minimise the impact of foreign exchange currency
volatility on the Group.
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Expand in new and
developing markets
We lack the necessary agility
and capability to identify, assess
and take advantage of potential
opportunities for overseas expansion
and market penetration strategies
for existing markets.
We continually review and assess opportunities for expansion, in terms of
both online and bricks and mortar retail, across all of the territories and
regions in which we operate.
Country and market entry strategies are based on the application of a
proven operating model and supported by the Operating Company with the
most relevant experience, capabilities and capacity to successfully lead a
market entry strategy.
We also ensure that any proposed acquisition or market entry strategy is
subject to an appropriate level of challenge and due diligence from both
the Group Executive and specialist Group functions which may include the
Tax, Treasury, Legal, Group Finance and Group Risk and Internal Audit
functions. This due diligence is also supported by external and
independent advisors when necessary.
One Team
Strategic aim Group risks Mitigation
Developing leaders
and connecting people
We do not make the necessary
investment in our people to ensure that
we have the appropriate calibre of staff,
skills and experience.
Across our businesses we are developing our talent, building our
leadership capability and connecting our people through intelligent
networks. Specific examples of this include:
The continued investment in development of our senior leaders
through the Kingfisher ‘One Academy’, including the 2020 Leadership
Programme and the development of networks across our businesses.
Focused development activities for our store-based colleagues, including
the roll out of national apprenticeship schemes across our UK and
French businesses, and an increased focus on how we support and
recognise the role of our customer advisors across the organisation.
Recognition of the importance of ensuring a constant flow of
developing talent through structured graduate and management trainee
programmes, providing sustainable career development paths supported
by new and innovative reward and bonus frameworks.
27
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Operational Risks
Risk Mitigation
Pricing A lack of perceived price
competitiveness, particularly when
compared to more discount based
or online competitors, would affect
our ability to maintain or grow
market share.
Significant investment in pricing to reinforce and communicate our
value credentials.
This is supported by:
The use of improved customer insight and analytical tools to optimise
product ranging and pricing strategies
Increased margin flexibility through partnerships with strategic vendors
and the leveraging of Group buying opportunities
More targeted use of online and mass media tools to communicate and
reinforce price perception (for example, price comparison websites, such
as kitchen-compare.com and bathroomcompare.com in the UK).
Risk Mitigation
Key supplier resilience
and continuity
Key product suppliers lacking the
necessary resilience or disaster
recovery capabilities to manage the
impact of on-going global economic
volatility or the increasing impacts of
extreme weather cycles and patterns
on their operations and extended
supply chains.
We continue to support our strategic suppliers through a combination of
relationship management, and ongoing supplier vulnerability assessments,
supported by supplier financing programmes where appropriate.
We also proactively look to ensure continuity of supply through the
expansion of our own brand programmes and dual sourcing strategies
where possible and commercially viable. On-going investment in our
sourcing offices outside of the Far East, notably in Poland and Turkey,
also provides increased flexibility for our sourcing strategies.
Risk Mitigation
Health & safety We fail to maintain a safe environment
for our customers and store colleagues
which results in a major incident or
fatality that is directly attributable to
a failure in our Health & Safety
management systems.
With 78,000 employees and millions of customers visiting our stores
each week, robust health and safety systems are a priority. The Board is
committed to creating and sustaining a safe environment for both our staff
and customers and regularly reviews and challenges Health & Safety
performance, standards and targets across our businesses.
As regulatory requirements vary from country to country, each operating
company is required to designate a director with specific responsibility
for health and safety. This person is then responsible for ensuring that a
written health and safety policy is communicated and that appropriate
health and safety arrangements are in place to protect our employees and
customers and that we comply with local regulatory requirements.
Compliance is monitored across our businesses through a programme of
self-certification and Health & Safety audits, with issues reported through
local Audit Committees and escalated to the Group Executive or Board
where necessary.
Risk Mitigation
Environmental or ethical
failure
Impact on Kingfisher’s reputation
and brand arising from a major
environmental or ethical failure, a
significant corporate fraud or material
non-compliance with legislative or
regulatory requirements resulting in
punitive or custodial procedures.
Both employees and suppliers working for or with Kingfisher must conduct
themselves according to our minimum standards of ethics and behaviours
as defined by our Code of Conduct. Responsibility for compliance with
our Code of Conduct rests with each Group Operating Company Chief
Executive and appropriate resources are available to our businesses to
ensure that both staff and suppliers are aware of, and comply with, the
code and our businesses can manage the legislative or regulatory
challenges presented by their respective jurisdictions.
Our commitment to sustainability remains a key value for Kingfisher and
across the organisation we continue to ensure that we engage with our key
environmental partners and stakeholders to ensure that, where possible,
we integrate sustainable practices into our business models and our
property, logistics and distribution strategies.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
28
GOVERNANCE
Board of directors
The Board is made up of a non-executive Chairman, four executive directors and six non-executive
directors who have overall collective responsibility for the direction of the Company. The role and
composition of the Board is set out on page 35.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
Current directorships: Joined the Board as Deputy
Chairman in May 2006 before being appointed
Chairman on 3 June 2009. He is President of
Provestis, his own investment company, and since
January 2010 has been Chairman of MAF Retail
Group, Dubai. He has also been Senior Advisor of
Towerbrook Capital Partners since October 2010.
He is a non-executive director of Alcatel Lucent and
Capgemini and Phase Eight Ltd. He is also President
of the HEC Business School Foundation in Paris and a
member of the Advisory Board of HEC.
Expertise and experience: Daniel provides
considerable retailing experience and expertise
to the Kingfisher Board. He was Chairman and
Chief Executive of Carrefour, the Paris-based retail
group and the world’s second largest retailer, from
1992 to 2005. Prior to Carrefour, he was Chief
Operating Officer of METRO, Germany’s leading
international retailer.
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in June
2000 and as Group Chief Executive in January 2008.
He is also a non-executive director of Whitbread plc,
lead non-executive member on the Department for
Work and Pensions Board, member of the Prince of
Wales Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change,
and a Member of the Business Disability Forum
President’s Group. In October 2012, Ian became
the Chairman of the British Retail Consortium.
Expertise and experience: Ian was previously
Chief Executive, B&Q UK from June 2005. He
was appointed Chief Executive International and
Development in September 2002, Chief Executive of
e-Kingfisher in May 2000 and was Group Director of
Strategy & Development. Before joining Kingfisher he
worked for a number of retail businesses including
Sears plc where he was Group Commercial Director.
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
October 2012.
Expertise and experience: Karen provides additional
recent relevant finance expertise to the Board. She
was previously Chief Financial Officer, Africa, Middle
East, Asia and Asia Pacific for Vodafone plc. From
1999 to 2010 she worked at BT plc, most recently as
Chief Financial Officer, BT Retail and Managing
Director Enterprises and before that as Managing
Director Operations, Openreach. She is a chartered
accountant and has experience in finance and
management roles at companies such as Paribas,
Diageo, Mars Electronics, The Observer newspaper
and Ernst & Whinney.
Andrew Bonfield
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board
in February 2010 and is Chairman of the Audit
Committee. He is Finance Director of National
Grid plc. He is also a Committee member of the
Hundred Group of Finance Directors.
Expertise and experience: Andrew brings significant
current finance experience to the Kingfisher Board.
He was previously Chief Financial Officer of Cadbury
plc and prior to that he was Chief Financial Officer of
Bristol-Myers Squibb from 2002 to 2007, Finance
Director of BG Group plc from 2001 to 2002 and
Chief Financial Officer of SmithKline Beecham Plc
from 1999 to 2000 during an 11 year period with the
pharmaceuticals group.
Pascal Cagni
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
November 2010. He is a non-voting director of the
supervisory board of Vivendi.
Expertise and experience: Pascal provides the
Board with expertise in the field of digital and online
retailing. Until recently, he was Vice President and
General Manager of Apple Europe, Middle East,
India and Africa, and was with Apple for ten years in a
variety of roles. His previous experience includes roles
at NEC, Compaq and Booz Allen Hamilton. He also
held the position of non-executive director on the
board of Egg Banking plc, from 2002 to 2006 and on
the board of Atari, the computer games company.
Clare Chapman
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board
in December 2010 and is Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee. She is currently Group
People Director of BT plc and is on the Advisory
Board of the Judge Institute, the Business School
of the University of Cambridge.
Expertise and experience: Clare brings significant
human resources expertise to the Kingfisher board.
She was previously the Director General of Workforce
for the NHS and Social Care, and was also a non-
executive director of TUI Travel plc and Chairman of
its Remuneration Committee. Her previous experience
also includes Group HR director of Tesco plc from
1999 to 2006 and HR Vice President of Pepsi-Cola’s
West and Central European operations from
1994 to 1999.
29
www.king?sher.com
Business review Governance Accounts
Audit Committee
Remuneration Committee
Nomination Committee
See pages 34 to 44 for further details.
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and Koçta s¸ Brands
Current directorships: Kevin was appointed to the
Board as Group Finance Director in October 2008.
He ceased to be Finance Director in September
2012. As CEO, B&Q and Koçtas¸ brands he holds
responsibility for the Group’s businesses in the UK,
Ireland, China, Turkey and the Hornbach investment
in Germany. He is deputy chairman of Koçtas¸
Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. and a member of the
supervisory board of Hornbach Holding AG. He is
Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the
Audit Committee of Land Securities plc.
Expertise and experience: Kevin worked for Dixons
Retail plc from 2002 to 2008 where he was Group
Finance Director. Previously he was European
Finance Director at Quaker Oats Limited. He is a
fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales.
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama and Brico Dépôt Brands
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
October 2012.
Expertise and experience: Philippe was appointed
Kingfisher Divisional CEO of Castorama and Brico
Dépôt after nine years with the Group. He previously
spent four years as Chief Executive of Kingfisher
France, and prior to this he spent five years as
CEO of Castorama France. He holds responsibility
for the Castorama and Brico Dépôt businesses in
France, Poland, Russia and Spain. He previously
held senior roles at DIY retailer Leroy Merlin and
furniture retailer Conforama.
Anders Dahlvig
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
December 2009. He is a director of Oriflame
Cosmetics AB, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB and
Axel Johnson AB; and is Chairman of The New Wave
Group and a member of the Advisory Board of Lund
University Business School. He is also a director of
Resurs Bank AB, and Pret A Manger Limited.
Expertise and experience: Anders brings extensive
commercial retailing expertise to the Board. He was
previously Chief Executive and President of The
IKEA Group from 1999 to 2009, having spent 26
years with the company. Prior to becoming Chief
Executive, he was Vice President of IKEA Europe
from 1997 to 1999 and Managing Director of IKEA
UK from 1993 to 1997.
Janis Kong
Non-Executive Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
December 2006. She is a non-executive director of
Portmeirion Group PLC, NetworkRail, VisitBritain and
TUI Travel plc. She is also a non-executive director of
Copenhagen Airports A/S.
Expertise and experience: Janis provides important
operational experience to the Kingfisher Board. She
was previously a non-executive director of The Royal
Bank of Scotland Group Plc and, until her retirement
in March 2006, was a director of BAA plc and
Chairman of Heathrow Airport Ltd for five years as well
as being Chairman of Heathrow Express. Prior to that
she was Managing Director of Gatwick Airport and has
held a number of operational roles within BAA during
her 33-year career with the company.
Mark Seligman
Senior Independent Director
Current directorships: Appointed to the Board in
January 2012. He is a non-executive director of BG
Group plc, where he is also chairman of the Audit
Committee. He serves as an alternate member of
the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, a member of
the Regional Growth Fund advisory panel and non-
executive deputy chairman of G4S, where he is also
Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Expertise and experience: Mark provides substantial
expertise to the Kingfisher Board in the field of
finance. He was a senior adviser at Credit Suisse.
He began his career at Price Waterhouse and spent
over 30 years in the City, including senior roles at SG
Warburg, BZW and Credit Suisse First Boston. At
Credit Suisse he was deputy chairman Europe from
1999 to 2005 and later Chairman UK Investment
Banking from 2003 to 2005.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
30
Group Executive
Ian Cheshire
Group Chief Executive
Kevin O’Byrne
CEO, B&Q and
Koçtas¸ brands
Philippe Tible
CEO, Castorama
and Brico Dépôt brands
Steve Willett
CEO, Group Productivity
and Development
Guy Colleau
CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer
Karen Witts
Group Finance Director
GROUP
OPERATING BOARD
11 members
DELIVERY
ONE TEAM
BOARD
25 members
ALIGNMENT
GROUP
EXECUTIVE
6 members
STRATEGY
Véronique Laury
CEO, Castorama France
Group Operating Board
Evelyn Gardiner
Group Human
Resources Director
Martyn Phillips
CEO, B&Q UK & Ireland
Alain Souillard
CEO, Brico Dépôt
brand, International
Marc Ténart
Finance Director, Castorama
and Brico Dépôt brands
One Team Board
Benedikt Benenati
Group Internal
Communications Director
Nick Folland
Group Corporate Affairs
Director: Net Positive
Anthony Sutcliffe
Group Sourcing Director
Ian Playford
Group Property Director
Alp Özpamukçu
CEO, Koçtas¸ Turkey
Clare Wardle
Group General Counsel
John Declerck
Group Strategy Director
Andrew Livingston
CEO, Screw?x
Tanguy Dewavrin
CEO, Castorama Poland
Ian Harding
Group Communications
Director
Pascal Gil
CEO, Brico Dépôt Spain
Christophe Mistou
Group Brands and Product
Development Director
Médéric Payne
CEO, Castorama Russia
Jacques Hayaux du Tilly
CEO, B&Q China
GOVERNANCE
Senior management
In addition to the Kingfisher plc Board,
the Group Executive is responsible for
the overall strategic decision-making
of the Group.
The Group Operating Board, made up of the Group
Executive and five other members, is responsible for the
delivery of the strategy, reviewing our progress against
it and ensuring strategic priorities are fully supported.
The One Team Board, made up of the Group Operating
Board and 14 other members, is responsible for
implementing the strategy and fulfilling our Better Homes,
Better Lives mission at an Operating Company level.
31
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ report
The directors present their report and
audited financial statements for the
financial year ended 2 February 2013.
Principal activities
The Group’s principal activity is selling home improvement
products and services through stores, catalogues and online
channels. Our aim is to make it easier for customers to have
better and more sustainable homes.
Business model
Our unique contribution as a business to our customers is that we
can harness our home improvement experience, our heritage as a
leader in sustainability and our international scale and sourcing
capability to bring new, more sustainable and more profitable
products and services to market. Our business model aims to
generate economic profit and cash by maximising our sales whilst
keeping costs low within our stores, our supply chain and our
central functions.
This model is used to deliver Kingfisher’s Creating the Leader
strategy, which is covered in detail on pages 6 to15.
Business review
The Business Review, which is set out on pages 2 to 27 provides a
comprehensive review of the development, performance and future
prospects of the Group’s operations for the year ended 2 February
2013. The information set out in the Business Review includes the
Group’s Key Performance Indicators, a statement on Corporate
Responsibility, a Financial Review including financial and capital risk,
and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the
Group. These sections are incorporated by reference and deemed to
form part of this report.
Dividends
The directors recommend a final dividend of 6.37p (2011/12:
6.37p) per ordinary share amounting to £151m (2011/12:
£148m) to be paid on 17 June 2013 to members appearing on
the Register at the close of business on 10 May 2013. Together
with the interim dividend of 3.09p (2011/12: 2.47p) per
ordinary share, amounting to £73m (2011/12: £57m), paid on
16 November 2012, the total dividend for the financial year
ended 2 February 2013 will be 9.46p (2011/12: 8.84p) per
ordinary share, amounting to £224m (2011/12: £205m).
The Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust has waived all dividends
payable by the Company in respect of the ordinary shares held
by it. The total dividends waived in the year to 2 February 2013
were in aggregate £3.2m.
Directors
Full biographical details of the current directors are set out on
pages 28 and 29. Philippe Tible and Karen Witts joined the
Board as executive directors on 1 October 2012, and will seek
appointment by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
(‘AGM’) on 13 June 2013. Euan Sutherland joined the Board as an
executive director on 1 October 2012 and resigned from the Board
on 31 January 2013 to join the Co-operative Group as CEO. In
accordance with the principles of the UK Corporate Governance
Code, all directors will retire and be submitted for appointment or
re-appointment at the AGM in 2013.
Directors’ indemnity arrangements
The Company has provided qualifying third-party deeds of
indemnity for the benefit of each director and former director
who held office during the 2012/13 financial year. The
Company has also purchased and maintained Directors’ and
Officers’ liability insurance throughout 2012/13. Neither the
indemnities nor the insurance provides cover in the event that
the director concerned is proved to have acted fraudulently.
Directors’ interests
Details of directors’ remuneration, service contracts and interests
in the Company’s shares and share options are set out in the
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. No director
had a material interest at any time during the year in any derivative
or financial instrument relating to the Company’s shares.
Principal risk identification and management
The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group have been
reviewed by the Board and are shown in the Risks section on
pages 25 to 27. The Risks section also provides information on the
performance of the Board in actively managing those risks, to allow
assessment of how the directors have performed their statutory
duty to promote the success of the Company.
Employees
The commitment of the Group’s employees is vital to
ensure that high standards of customer care and service
are maintained throughout the business. The Group is fully
committed to treating its employees and customers with dignity
and respect, and to valuing diversity. It is Group policy to:
ensure there is no discrimination in employment on the
grounds of race, gender, age, disability, marital status, sexual
orientation or religious belief;
implement measures in stores to ensure a level of customer
service for disabled people equivalent to that offered to non-
disabled people; and
maintain a mechanism which customers and employees can
use to give feedback on the Group’s performance and ensure
that all customer comments are analysed, responded to and
acted upon.
Across the Group, women accounted for 40% of total
employees and 30% of managers in 2012/13. B&Q UK
continued its long-established policy of promoting age diversity,
with around a quarter of its employees aged over 50.
The Group’s statement on employee development is set out in the
People section of the Company’s website, and details of employee
involvement through participation in share incentive schemes are
contained in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59.
There are a number of communication channels in place to
help employees to develop their knowledge of, and enhance
their involvement with, the Group. These channels include
engagement surveys, briefing groups, internal magazines and
newsletters that report on business performance and objectives,
community involvement and other applicable issues. Directors
and senior management regularly visit stores and discuss
matters of current interest and concern with employees.
Corporate responsibility
Details of the Group’s corporate responsibility policy and
operations are set out on page 16.
Charitable donations
Kingfisher and its subsidiaries made contributions to
charity/community projects worth an estimated £2.4m
(2011/12: £1.8m) during the financial year ended 2 February
2013, equivalent to 0.3% of adjusted pre-tax profits. This
included cash donations (£1.6m) and gifts-in-kind (£0.5m –
with product donations at cost price). Support was also given
through the donation of time by employees (£0.3m).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
32
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Report continued
Political donations
The Board annually seeks and obtains shareholders’ approval
to enable the Group to make donations or incur expenditure in
relation to EU political parties, other political organisations or
independent election candidates under section 366 of the
Companies Act 2006.
The Group made no political donations during the year
(2011/12: £nil). As with previous annual approvals, the Group
has no intention of changing its current policy and practice of
not making political donations. The Board seeks the approval
on a precautionary basis to avoid any unintentional breach of
the relevant provisions. Shareholder approval will be sought at
this year’s AGM to renew this authority; further details are
provided in the Notice of AGM.
Supplier payment policy
The Company does not impose standard payment terms on its
suppliers but agrees specific terms with each of them, and then
pays in accordance with those terms. The Group’s UK operating
companies have all signed up to the Prompt Payment Code. On
average, the Company’s suppliers are paid in 45 days.
Significant agreements – change of control
There are a number of agreements that take effect, alter or
terminate upon a change of control of the Company following
a takeover bid, such as bank loan agreements, Medium Term
Note (‘MTN’) documentation, private placement debt and
employee share plans. None of these are deemed to be
significant in terms of their potential impact on the business
of the Group as a whole except for:
the £200 million credit facility dated 8 July 2011 between the
Company, HSBC Bank plc (as the facility agent) and the banks
named therein as lenders, which contains a provision such
that in the event of a change of control any lender may, if
they so require, notify the agent that they wish to cancel their
commitment whereupon the commitment of that lender will be
cancelled and all their outstanding loans, together with accrued
interest, will become immediately due and payable; and
the US$297 million US Private Placement notes, issued
pursuant to a note purchase agreement dated 24 May 2006
by the Company to various institutions, which contains a
provision such that in the event of a change of control, the
Company is required to make an offer to the holders of the
US Private Placement notes to prepay the principal amount
of the notes together with interest accrued.
The Company does not have agreements with any director or
officer that would provide compensation for loss of office or
employment resulting from a takeover, except that provisions of
the Company’s share incentive schemes may cause options and
awards granted under such schemes to vest on a takeover.
Essential contracts
There is no information that the Company would be required to
disclose about persons with whom it has contractual or other
arrangements that are essential to the business of the Company.
Share capital
Details of the Company’s issued share capital are set out in
note 28 to the consolidated financial statements. All of the
Company’s issued ordinary shares are fully paid up and rank
equally in all respects.
The rights and obligations attaching to the Company’s ordinary
shares, in addition to those conferred on their holders by law, are
set out in the Company’s Articles of Association, copies of which
can be obtained from the Company’s website. The holders of
ordinary shares are entitled to receive the Company’s Annual
Report and Accounts, to attend and speak at general meetings of
the Company, to appoint proxies and to exercise voting rights.
There are no restrictions on the transfer of ordinary shares or on
the exercise of voting rights attached to them, except (i) where
the Company has exercised its right to suspend their voting
rights or to prohibit their transfer following the omission of their
holder or any person interested in them to provide the Company
with information requested by it in accordance with Part 22 of
the Companies Act 2006 or (ii) where their holder is precluded
from exercising voting rights by the Financial Services Authority
Listing Rules or the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
The Company has a Sponsored Level 1 American Depositary
Receipt (‘ADR’) programme in the United States.
Authority to allot shares
At the AGM in 2012, shareholders approved a resolution to give the
directors authority to allot shares up to an aggregate nominal value of
£124,107,897. In addition, shareholders approved a resolution to
give the directors authority to allot up to a nominal amount of
£248,215,795 in connection with an offer by way of a rights issue in
accordance with ABI guidance. If this additional allotment authority
were used, the ABI guidance would be followed. The directors have
no present intention to issue ordinary shares, other than pursuant to
employee share incentive schemes. These resolutions remain valid
until the conclusion of this year’s AGM when resolutions will be
proposed to renew these authorities.
Authority to purchase own shares
At the AGM in 2012, shareholders approved a resolution for the
Company to make purchases of its own shares to a maximum
number of 236,933,259 ordinary shares, being approximately
10% of the issued share capital. This resolution remains valid
until the conclusion of this year’s AGM. As at 25 March 2013, the
directors have not used this authority. In order to retain maximum
flexibility, a resolution will be proposed at this year’s AGM to renew
this authority. It is the Company’s current intention that shares
acquired under this authority will be cancelled.
Financial instruments
The Group’s financial risk management objectives and policies
are set out in note 24 to the financial statements on pages
87 to 89. Note 24 also details the Group’s exposure to foreign
exchange, interest, credit and liquidity risks. These notes are
included by reference and form part of this report.
Major shareholders
As at 7 March 2013, the Company was aware of the following
interests in its shares:
Number of
ordinary
shares held
% of total
voting rights
Thornberg Investments Management Inc 194,252,960 8.77%
Templeton Investments Counsel, LLC 197,406,849 8.33%
Capital Research Global Investors 115,655,941 4.88%
Annual General Meeting
The 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Company will be
held on 13 June 2013 at the Hilton London Paddington Hotel,
Paddington at 11.00am. A full description of the business to be
conducted at the meeting is set out in the separate Notice of
Annual General Meeting.
By order of the Board
Paul Moore
Company Secretary
25 March 2013
33
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ statement of responsibility
Going concern
The directors confirm that, after reviewing expenditure
commitments, expected cash flows and borrowing facilities,
they have a reasonable expectation that Kingfisher plc (the
‘Company’) and the Kingfisher Group of companies (the
‘Group’) have adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the next financial year and the foreseeable future.
For this reason they continue to adopt the going concern basis
in preparing these financial statements. Further details of the
Group’s liquidity are detailed in the financial review on page 17.
Disclosure of information to auditors
Each person who is a director at the date of approval of this
report confirms that: so far as he or she is aware, there is no
relevant audit information (as defined by section 418 of the
Companies Act 2006) of which the Company’s auditors are
unaware; and each director has taken all the steps that he
or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make
himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information
and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of
that information.
Responsibility for preparing financial statements
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulations.
UK company law requires the directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors
are required to prepare the Group financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as adopted by the European Union and Article 4 of
the IAS Regulation and have elected to prepare the parent
Company financial statements in accordance with United
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United
Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under
company law the directors must not approve the accounts
unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the
state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the
Company for that period.
In preparing the parent Company financial statements,
the directors are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently;
make judgements and accounting estimates that are
reasonable and prudent;
follow applicable UK Accounting Standards (except where
any departures from this requirement are explained in the
notes to the parent Company financial statements); and
prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
In preparing the Group financial statements in accordance
with IAS 1; ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’, the directors
are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently;
present information, including accounting policies, in a
manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information;
provide additional disclosures when compliance with the
specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and
financial performance; and
make an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as a
going concern.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time
the financial position of the Company and enable them to
ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies
Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets
of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity
of the corporate and financial information included on the
Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Responsibility statement
The directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the
relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or
loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the
consolidation taken as a whole; and
the business review, which is incorporated into the Directors’
Report, includes a fair review of the development and
performance of the business and the position of the Company
and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a
whole, together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that they face.
By order of the Board
Paul Moore
Company Secretary
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
34
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the Company’s Corporate Governance
report for the year ended 2 February 2013. The aim of this
report is to provide a clear and meaningful explanation of the
Company’s governance arrangements, which we consider to
be essential for the long-term success of the Company, and the
promotion of the highest standards of corporate governance.
The Board remains committed to promoting the highest
standards of corporate governance, understanding that an
efficient, challenging and diverse Board is essential to enable
the business to deliver its strategy and shareholders’ long-term
interests, whilst generating stakeholder confidence that the
business is conducting itself in a responsible manner. As part
of its overall governance arrangements, the Company’s Code
of Conduct, which mandates minimum standards of behaviour
for all employees and suppliers, was updated and relaunched
across the Group during the year.
As last year, this report reviews the operation of the Company
by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’)
and a statement of compliance with the Code is set out
opposite. The Company is required to report its compliance
against the revised 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code for
its financial year commencing 3 February 2013, and we are
confident that it will be able to report compliance with the
revisions within our 2013/14 annual report.
This report, together with the Directors’ Report on pages 31 to
32, and the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59,
provides details of how the Company has applied the principles
and complied with the provisions of the Code. A copy of the
Code is available at www.frc.org.uk.
The Board constantly reviews its governance framework,
adjusting where necessary the roles, structure and
accountabilities of its mechanisms of governance. During the
year, the governance structure below the Board and primary
committee level was reviewed. As part of the review the terms
of reference of the Group Executive Committee, the Kingfisher
Capex Committee and the Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury
Committee, were all reviewed and, where necessary, amended
to reflect the operations of those committees and the powers
delegated to them. As part of the review, the Group Executive
Committee will focus on the development of the Group’s
strategy, and its membership was expanded and enhanced.
In addition, a new Group Operating Board was established, and
this committee will focus on the delivery of the Group’s strategy.
The revised Group governance structure, together with an overview
of each of these Committees, is set out on pages 38 to 39.
Maintaining and promoting the highest standards of corporate
governance remains central to my role as Chairman, and I am
pleased to endorse this Corporate Governance Report, which I
believe demonstrates how, through its actions, the Board and its
Committees fulfil their governance responsibilities and embed
good governance practices on an on-going basis.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
25 March 2013
Compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
The Board is required to report on the operations of the
Company by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code
(the ‘Code’), and has reviewed its operations and governance
framework to ensure that they reflect the principles of the
Code. In accordance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing
Authority, the Board confirms that, throughout the year ended
2 February 2013, and as at the date of this report, the
Company has complied with the provisions set out in
Section 1 of the Code, save for as set out below.
Provision D.1.1 provides that grants under long-term incentive
schemes should normally be phased rather than awarded in
one large block.
As reported in our 2011/12 annual report, the Company set
stretching long-term targets for management as part of the
Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy. The
Remuneration Committee approved awards under the
Performance Share Plan of up to 500% of base salary.
The award was higher than the normal award of 200% but
in making it, the Committee took into account the fact that
no further awards would be made under the Plan until the
financial year 2014/15, and felt that it created a better focus
on a single performance period aligned to the next phase of
the Group’s strategy, rather than the more commonly used
overlapping performance periods.
“
AN EFFICIENT, CHALLENGING AND DIVERSE
BOARD IS ESSENTIAL TO ENABLE THE BUSINESS
TO DELIVER ITS STRATEGY AND SHAREHOLDERS’
LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
For a PDF of the Corporate Governance Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
35
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
35
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Leadership
The role of the Board
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the management,
direction and performance of the Group, and leads and
controls the Group’s business. The Board is also responsible
for ensuring appropriate resources are in place to achieve
its strategy and deliver sustainable performance. Through
authorities delegated to its Committees, the Board directs and
reviews the Group’s operations within an agreed framework
of controls, allowing risk to be assessed and managed within
agreed parameters. The Board is collectively accountable to the
Company’s shareholders for the proper conduct and success
of the business.
The Board’s powers are set out in the Company’s Articles of
Association, which are available to view on its website, and
may be amended by a special resolution of its members.
The Board may exercise all powers conferred on it by the
Articles, in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and
other applicable legislation.
The Board has established a formal schedule of matters
reserved for its approval, and has delegated other specific
responsibilities to its princip committees: the Audit,
Remuneration and Nomination Committees. These are clearly
defined within the written terms of reference of the respective
committees. Information on the responsibilities and work of
each of the Board’s committees is set out on pages 40 to 44.
During the year, as part of its annual review process, the matters
reserved for the Board were reviewed, and, where necessary
amended to reflect best practice. The schedule of matters
reserved for the Board includes the consideration and
approval of:
• the Group’s overall strategy, medium-term plans and
annual budgets;
• financial statements and Group dividend policy including
recommendation of the final dividend;
• major acquisitions, disposals and capital expenditure;
• major changes to the capital structure including tax and
treasury management;
• major changes to accounting policies or practices;
• the Group’s corporate governance and compliance
arrangements;
• the system of internal control and risk management policy;
and
• review of management development strategy.
Composition of the Board
The Board is made up of a non-executive Chairman, four
executive directors and six non-executive directors. The current
balance of the Board’s skills, experience and knowledge,
together with regular briefings by executives below Board level,
ensures that views, perceptions and discussions are not
dominated by any one specific view. The composition of the
Board is continually reviewed to ensure it remains suitable for
the needs of the business, and this continues to be the primary
focus of the Nomination Committee.
There is an established, formal, rigorous and transparent
procedure for the selection and appointment of new directors to
the Board, and this is described in the Nomination Committee
Report on page 43. During the year, Kevin O’Byrne stepped
down as Group Finance Director to take up the role of CEO
B&Q and Koçta s¸ brands, and was replaced by Karen Witts,
who joined the Board on 1 October 2012. Euan Sutherland
and Philippe Tible were appointed to the Board as executive
directors on 1 October 2012. Mr Sutherland subsequently
stepped down from the Board on 31 January 2013 ahead of
leaving the Group in March 2013.
At the Annual General Meeting to be held on 13 June 2013,
shareholders will be asked to appoint Karen Witts and Philippe
Tible and, in accordance with Principle B.7.1 of the Code, re-
appoint their fellow directors.
Role of the non-executive directors
Non-executive directors provide a strong, independent and
external insight to the Board and its Committees, and have
a wealth of experience and business knowledge from
other sectors and industries. The terms and conditions of
appointment of each of the non-executive directors are available
for inspection at the Company’s registered office and will also
be available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting.
During the year, the Board considered the independence of
each of the non-executive directors (other than the Chairman,
who was deemed independent by the Board at the date of
his appointment) against the criteria specified in the Code,
and concluded that each remained fully independent of
management and free from any relationship that could
interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.
Role of the Senior Independent Director
Since his appointment in January 2012, Mark Seligman has
acted as Senior Independent Director (‘SID’), supporting the
Chairman, and is available for approach or representation from
significant shareholders who feel they are unable to raise issues
with the Chairman, Group Chief Executive or Group Finance
Director. In accordance with the Financial Reporting Council’s
(‘FRC’) guidelines, the role of the SID is formally set out in
writing, and available on the Company’s website. During the
year, there were no requests from shareholders or other
Board directors for access to the SID.
Roles of the Chairman and Group Chief Executive
There is a clear division of responsibilities between the
Chairman and the Group Chief Executive. As part of its
annual review process, the Board reviewed the written roles
of the Chairman and Group Chief Executive to ensure they
remained compliant with, and took account of, best practice
developments, and were in line with FRC guidance. The
written roles are available to view on the Company’s website.
The Chairman is responsible for the overall operation,
leadership and governance of the Board, setting the tone and
style of Board discussions, and creating the conditions for
overall Board and individual director effectiveness. He is also
responsible for ensuring that all members of the Board develop
an understanding of the views of major shareholders, that there
is an open dialogue with shareholders, and that the Chairmen of
the Board’s princip committees are available to answer
shareholder questions at the Annual General Meeting.
al
al
34
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the Company’s Corporate Governance
report for the year ended 2 February 2013. The aim of this
report is to provide a clear and meaningful explanation of the
Company’s governance arrangements, which we consider to
be essential for the long-term success of the Company, and the
promotion of the highest standards of corporate governance.
The Board remains committed to promoting the highest
standards of corporate governance, understanding that an
efficient, challenging and diverse Board is essential to enable
the business to deliver its strategy and shareholders’ long-term
interests, whilst generating stakeholder confidence that the
business is conducting itself in a responsible manner. As part
of its overall governance arrangements, the Company’s Code
of Conduct, which mandates minimum standards of behaviour
for all employees and suppliers, was updated and relaunched
across the Group during the year.
As last year, this report reviews the operation of the Company
by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’)
and a statement of compliance with the Code is set out
opposite. The Company is required to report its compliance
against the revised 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code for
its financial year commencing 3 February 2013, and we are
confident that it will be able to report compliance with the
revisions within our 2013/14 annual report.
This report, together with the Directors’ Report on pages 31 to
32, and the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59,
provides details of how the Company has applied the principles
and complied with the provisions of the Code. A copy of the
Code is available at www.frc.org.uk.
The Board constantly reviews its governance framework,
adjusting where necessary the roles, structure and
accountabilities of its mechanisms of governance. During the
year, the governance structure below the Board and primary
committee level was reviewed. As part of the review the terms
of reference of the Group Executive Committee, the Kingfisher
Capex Committee and the Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury
Committee, were all reviewed and, where necessary, amended
to reflect the operations of those committees and the powers
delegated to them. As part of the review, the Group Executive
Committee will focus on the development of the Group’s
strategy, and its membership was expanded and enhanced.
In addition, a new Group Operating Board was established, and
this committee will focus on the delivery of the Group’s strategy.
The revised Group governance structure, together with an overview
of each of these Committees, is set out on pages 38 to 39.
Maintaining and promoting the highest standards of corporate
governance remains central to my role as Chairman, and I am
pleased to endorse this Corporate Governance Report, which I
believe demonstrates how, through its actions, the Board and its
Committees fulfil their governance responsibilities and embed
good governance practices on an on-going basis.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
25 March 2013
Compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
The Board is required to report on the operations of the
Company by reference to the UK Corporate Governance Code
(the ‘Code’), and has reviewed its operations and governance
framework to ensure that they reflect the principles of the
Code. In accordance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing
Authority, the Board confirms that, throughout the year ended
2 February 2013, and as at the date of this report, the
Company has complied with the provisions set out in
Section 1 of the Code, save for as set out below.
Provision D.1.1 provides that grants under long-term incentive
schemes should normally be phased rather than awarded in
one large block.
As reported in our 2011/12 annual report, the Company set
stretching long-term targets for management as part of the
Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy. The
Remuneration Committee approved awards under the
Performance Share Plan of up to 500% of base salary.
The award was higher than the normal award of 200% but
in making it, the Committee took into account the fact that
no further awards would be made under the Plan until the
financial year 2014/15, and felt that it created a better focus
on a single performance period aligned to the next phase of
the Group’s strategy, rather than the more commonly used
overlapping performance periods.
“
AN EFFICIENT, CHALLENGING AND DIVERSE
BOARD IS ESSENTIAL TO ENABLE THE BUSINESS
TO DELIVER ITS STRATEGY AND SHAREHOLDERS’
LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
”
Daniel Bernard
Chairman
For a PDF of the Corporate Governance Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
36
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
The Group Chief Executive, Ian Cheshire, is responsible for all
executive management of the Group’s business, consistent with
the strategy and commercial objectives agreed by the Board.
He leads the Group Executive team in effecting decisions
of the Board and its Committees, and is responsible for the
maintenance and protection of the reputation of the Company
and its subsidiaries. The Group Chief Executive is also
responsible for promoting and conducting the affairs of the
Group with the highest standards of integrity, probity and
corporate governance.
Company Secretary
The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Board and its
committees and, with the consent of the Board, may delegate
responsibility for the management of the committees to
other suitably qualified staff. The Company Secretary is also
responsible for ensuring that correct Board procedures are
followed, and advises the Board on corporate governance
matters. All directors have access to the advice and services
of the Company Secretary, and their appointment and removal
is one of the matters reserved to the Board. The Board also
has access to the Group General Counsel for legal and
compliance advice.
Diversity on the Board
In September 2011, the Board announced its approach to
diversity. The statement, which is available on the Company’s
website, confirmed that the Board is committed to ensuring
directors of the Company possess, and demonstrate a broad
balance of skills, experience, independence, knowledge and
diversity, including gender diversity. During the year, the
Nomination Committee considered the diversity of candidates
short-listed for the role of Group Finance Director before
appointing Karen Witts on 1 October 2012. The Board
believes that balanced and diverse Boards are effective, and
is committed to maximising the benefits of a diverse workforce
to deliver real sustainable benefits for the Group and
its shareholders.
The charts below demonstrate the gender split at Board level,
One Team Leadership Group level, and for the workforce
as a whole.
Effectiveness
Board meetings
The Board holds regular scheduled meetings throughout
the year and holds unscheduled supplementary meetings as
and when necessary. These meetings are structured to allow
open discussion. At each meeting the Board receives certain
regular reports which include an update from the Group Chief
Executive, current trading/finance (including liquidity) reports
from the Group Finance Director, capital expenditure approvals
and reports from the Company Secretary (including governance,
legal, insurance and risk, and corporate responsibility updates)
and people-related updates from the Group Human
Resources Director.
All directors participate in discussing strategy, trading and
financial performance, and risk management of the Group.
Comprehensive briefing papers are circulated to all directors
approximately one week before each meeting in digital format.
Should a director be unable to attend a particular meeting, they
are provided with all relevant briefing papers and are given the
opportunity to discuss any issues with the Chairman or the Group
Chief Executive and, where possible, participate by telephone for
critical discussions and approvals on specific matters.
The Board generally meets at the Group’s head office in London
and holds at least one meeting each year overseas. During the
year under review, the Board held a meeting in Paris, and
reviewed the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands in France,
Poland, Russia and Spain. In addition to its normal meetings,
at least once per year, the Board holds a meeting off site, which
focuses on presentations from the UK executive team and
includes visits to UK stores. During the year, the Board held
two such meetings and visited the Group’s regional Distribution
Centre and a B&Q store in Swindon. It is the Board’s intention
to conduct at least one meeting each year outside the UK in a
country in which the Group operates.
At the request of any non-executive director, the Chairman will
arrange meetings consisting of just the non-executive directors.
During the year, the Chairman and non-executive directors met
without the executive directors, and there were no matters of
concern raised at this meeting.
Board One Team Leadership Group Total workforce
Female 27%
Male 73%
Female 22%
Male 78%
Female 40%
Male 60%
Gender split
37
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
The Chairman maintains regular contact with the Senior
Independent Director and met with each of the non-executive
directors individually as part of the Board evaluation discussions.
Activities during the year
During the year, in addition to its regular business, the Board:
oversaw the development and articulation of the Group’s Net
Positive strategy;
approved the process for the review of the Company’s defined
benefit pension scheme, and approved the curtailment of that
scheme to new members and an enhancement of the
defined contribution scheme;
reviewed the Group’s risk profile and defined the process by
which the risk appetite of the Board would be established;
considered and approved the commencement of the
examinership process for its business in Ireland;
reviewed the Group’s anti-bribery and corruption policies and
procedures to ensure continued compliance with the UK
Bribery Act; and
received regular strategic presentations from management
and held “deep dive” discussions with management of the
Group’s Operating Companies, information technology and
Group sourcing management.
Board evaluation
The Board conducts a review of its performance each year.
During the year under review, the Board evaluated its
effectiveness using an externally facilitated questionnaire and
a series of one-to-one interviews between each director and the
Chairman. The questionnaire was developed by reference to
the topics discussed and recommendations made during the
previous evaluation, and drafted following discussions between
the Chairman, the Company Secretary and the external facilitator,
Lintstock. Responses to the questionnaire were collated and the
output was used by the Chairman in his individual meetings
with directors as part of the evaluation process.
The areas considered during the evaluation were:
Board composition;
Board expertise;
strategic oversight;
risk management and internal control; and
succession planning and human resource management.
The results of the evaluation were considered by the Board at its
meeting in January 2013. No significant issues were highlighted
and the review clearly indicated that the Board continued to
work efficiently and effectively, and that the contribution and
commitment of each director, and their interaction with each
other, was good, and that the non-executive directors offered
robust challenge where appropriate. As a result of the
evaluation, the Board agreed to undertake the following
activities during the 2013/14 financial year:
review the forward business agenda to ensure that there is
sufficient time to focus on common key Group programmes
and initiatives;
maintain oversight of the Group’s performance relative to its
competitors and customer trends; and
increase its exposure to the Group’s senior management
below the Board.
As part of the evaluation process, the Group Chief Executive
carried out a performance review of the executive directors.
In addition, the non-executive directors, led by the Senior
Independent Director, conducted the performance review
of the Chairman in respect of the financial year.
The Board has confirmed that the contribution of each of the
directors continues to be effective and that shareholders should
be supportive of their appointment or re-appointment to the
Board. Biographical details of each director are set out on
pages 28 to 29.
The Board will continue to review its procedures, effectiveness
and development in the year ahead, and the Chairman will use
the output of the most recent Board evaluation in his individual
meetings with directors during the year.
In accordance with Provision B.6.2 of the Code, which requires
Boards to undertake an externally facilitated evaluation at least
every three years, the Board intends to appoint a suitable
independent facilitator during the year to conduct the 2013/14
performance evaluation, and will report on the findings of that
evaluation within the 2013/14 annual report.
Board and Committee meeting attendance
The following table shows the number of years each director has served on the Board as at the financial year end, and their
attendance at the scheduled Board and Committee meetings which they were eligible to attend:
Tenure
in years Board
Audit
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Daniel Bernard 6 9/9 – 4/4 3/4
(3)
Andrew Bonfield 3 8/9 4/4 3/4 3/4
(3)
Pascal Cagni 2 8/9 – – 4/4
Clare Chapman 2 9/9 – 4/4 4/4
Ian Cheshire 12 9/9 – – –
Anders Dahlvig 3 8/9 3/4 – 3/4
(3)
Janis Kong 6 9/9 4/4 4/4 3/4
(3)
Kevin O’Byrne 4 9/9 – – –
Mark Seligman 1 9/9 4/4 – 4/4
Euan Sutherland
(1),(2)
<1 3/3 – – –
Philippe Tible
(1)
<1 3/3 – – –
Karen Witts
(1)
<1 3/3 – – –
(1) Euan Sutherland, Philippe Tible and Karen Witts were appointed to the Board with effect from 1 October 2012.
(2) Euan Sutherland retired from the Board following the meeting on 31 January 2013.
(3) Directors did not attend meetings where their reappointment was considered.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
38
38
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Induction, information and professional development
All new directors appointed to the Board receive an induction
pack as part of their comprehensive induction programme
tailored to their experience, background and particular areas
of focus. The induction programme is designed to develop
directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Group’s
operations and culture.
The induction programme includes:
• individual one-to-one meetings with the Chairman, the Group
Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director and other directors;
• site visits to the Group’s stores and those of its competitors;
• meetings with management of the Group’s Operating
Companies and other senior management; and
• if required, external training courses at the Group’s expense.
In accordance with best practice, the Chairman considers and
addresses the development needs of the Board as a whole, if
any, and ensures that each director updates their individual
skills, knowledge and expertise.
Following the appointment of three new executive directors
during the year, the Company Secretary arranged for the Group’s
corporate lawyers to provide a training session on their duties and
responsibilities as directors of a UK listed company. Amongst other
topics, the training covered Listing Rules compliance and the
control and release of inside information, and provided case
studies and practical situations for the directors to consider.
Subsequent training in specific aspects of the Group’s
businesses is provided to directors, when requested, or regularly
as part of site visits. Directors are briefed on issues at Board and
Committee meetings and have full and timely access to relevant
information ahead of each meeting.
The Board also receives reports on circumstances where issues
and concerns have been raised by the Company’s institutional
shareholders. This process allows directors to develop
necessary understanding of the views of these shareholders
and also enables the Board to judge whether investors have a
sufficient understanding of the Group’s objectives.
In addition to planned development and briefings, directors are
expected to take responsibility for identifying their own individual
needs and to take necessary steps to ensure that they are
adequately informed about the Group and their responsibilities
as a director. The Board is confident that all its members have
the requisite knowledge, ability and experience to perform the
functions required of a director of a listed company. There
is also an agreed procedure whereby directors may take
independent professional advice at the Group’s expense in
the furtherance of their duties.
Conflicts of interest
Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 to
avoid a situation where he or she may have a direct or indirect
interest that conflicts with the interests of the Company. The
Company has robust procedures in place to identify, authorise
and manage such conflicts of interest, and these procedures
have operated effectively during the year.
A register of directors’ situational and transactional conflicts is
maintained by the Company Secretary and reviewed by the
Board on a regular basis. The Board confirmed during the year
that there were no situations of which they were aware which
would, or potentially could, give rise to conflicts with the
interests of the Company, other than those that might arise from
directors’ other appointments, which are set out in the directors’
biographies on pages 28 to 29.
Committees
The Board has delegated authority to its princip committees
to carry out certain tasks as defined in each committee’s
respective terms of reference. The written terms of reference
in respect of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination
Committees are available on the Company’s website. The
Board is satisfied that the terms of reference for each of these
committees satisfy the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. The terms of reference of the princip
committees are reviewed on an on-going basis.
The minutes of committee meetings are made available to all
directors on a timely basis. In addition, at each Board meeting,
the chairmen of each of the principal committees provide the
Board with a brief synopsis of the work carried out by the
committee, if any, between Board meetings.
In addition to the princip committees, the Board is supported
by the work of the Group Executive Committee and its
subcommittees. Together these committees form a fundamental
element of the Company’s corporate governance framework,
although they are not formally appointed committees of the
Board. The Group’s governance structure is set out below. A
brief explanation of the work of the Group Executive Committee
and the other management committees is set out below:
al
al
al
39
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Group Executive Committee
The responsibilities, structure and composition of the Group
Executive Committee were reviewed and amended during the
year. The Committee consists of the executive directors, the
CEO, Productivity and Development, and the CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer. The Committee meets formally ten times
a year under the chairmanship of the Group Chief Executive.
The members’ details are set out on page 30.
The Committee’s primary focus is the strategic direction of the
Group. In addition, the Committee monitors top talent within the
business and reviews key items requiring formal Board approval
including dividend planning, key projects and strategic
capex decisions.
In accordance with its formal terms of reference, the Group
Executive Committee is also responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board on:
• strategic and business plans of individual businesses;
• the Group’s capital structure and funding;
• strategic capital expenditure proposals, major acquisitions
or disposals of businesses;
• the Group’s key risks;
• management development and senior executive succession
plans; and
• the Group’s corporate responsibility programme.
During the year, the Committee met seven times and, in
addition to its standing agenda, reviewed:
• the Group’s branding strategies and Group procurement and
sourcing arrangements;
• UK pension reform and the curtailment of the Group’s final
salary pension scheme and enhancement of the defined
contribution scheme;
• operating budgets and monthly trading performance;
• the Group’s IT strategy and planning;
• the Group’s Irish business and the examinership process;
• strategy for embedding sustainability into Group
behaviours; and
• HR proposals for management development and
succession planning.
Group Operating Board
The Group Operating Board was established following a review
of the work of the Group Executive Committee in March 2013,
and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Group’s businesses. In addition, the Group Operating Board
reviews the overall financial performance of the Group against
its strategic plans and budget. The Group Operating Board will
also review people-related activities as part of its structured
agenda, and will conduct deep-dive reviews of key areas
affecting the business. The Group Operating Board, which
meets monthly, comprises all the members of the Group
Executive Committee, the CEOs of B&Q UK & Ireland,
Castorama France and Brico Dépôt brands, the Group
Human Resources Director, and the Finance Director
of the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands.
Kingfisher Capex Committee
The Capex Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving all capital expenditure projects relating to property
and non-property proposals in excess of an agreed threshold,
which is reviewed periodically. The decisions of the Committee
are reported to the Board following each meeting, and the
Committee will make recommendations to the Board regarding
all projects exceeding its agreed approval threshold. The
Committee comprises the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, Group Property Director, CEO, Group
Productivity and Development, the Group General Counsel,
and the Head of Property Finance.
Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury Committee
The primary purpose of the Committee is to monitor compliance
of policies and control issues relating to Group Finance, and to
review key proposals from Group Finance, Treasury, Tax and
Secretariat functions, and where appropriate recommend
certain initiatives for approval to the Board. The Committee
comprises the Group Finance Director, Group Finance and
Planning Director, Group Treasurer, Group Tax Director, Head
of Group Pensions, Head of Corporate Development, Group
General Counsel, Company Secretary and Group Audit and
Risk Director.
Details of each of the Board’s princip committees, including
membership, are set out in the following reports.
al
Group Executive
Committee
King?sher Capex
Committee
Financial Initiatives,
Tax & Treasury
Committee
Group Operating
Board
Audit
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Organisation and Governance Structure
Board
39
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
38
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
Induction, information and professional development
All new directors appointed to the Board receive an induction
pack as part of their comprehensive induction programme
tailored to their experience, background and particular areas
of focus. The induction programme is designed to develop
directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Group’s
operations and culture.
The induction programme includes:
• individual one-to-one meetings with the Chairman, the Group
Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director and other directors;
• site visits to the Group’s stores and those of its competitors;
• meetings with management of the Group’s Operating
Companies and other senior management; and
• if required, external training courses at the Group’s expense.
In accordance with best practice, the Chairman considers and
addresses the development needs of the Board as a whole, if
any, and ensures that each director updates their individual
skills, knowledge and expertise.
Following the appointment of three new executive directors
during the year, the Company Secretary arranged for the Group’s
corporate lawyers to provide a training session on their duties and
responsibilities as directors of a UK listed company. Amongst other
topics, the training covered Listing Rules compliance and the
control and release of inside information, and provided case
studies and practical situations for the directors to consider.
Subsequent training in specific aspects of the Group’s
businesses is provided to directors, when requested, or regularly
as part of site visits. Directors are briefed on issues at Board and
Committee meetings and have full and timely access to relevant
information ahead of each meeting.
The Board also receives reports on circumstances where issues
and concerns have been raised by the Company’s institutional
shareholders. This process allows directors to develop
necessary understanding of the views of these shareholders
and also enables the Board to judge whether investors have a
sufficient understanding of the Group’s objectives.
In addition to planned development and briefings, directors are
expected to take responsibility for identifying their own individual
needs and to take necessary steps to ensure that they are
adequately informed about the Group and their responsibilities
as a director. The Board is confident that all its members have
the requisite knowledge, ability and experience to perform the
functions required of a director of a listed company. There
is also an agreed procedure whereby directors may take
independent professional advice at the Group’s expense in
the furtherance of their duties.
Conflicts of interest
Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 to
avoid a situation where he or she may have a direct or indirect
interest that conflicts with the interests of the Company. The
Company has robust procedures in place to identify, authorise
and manage such conflicts of interest, and these procedures
have operated effectively during the year.
A register of directors’ situational and transactional conflicts is
maintained by the Company Secretary and reviewed by the
Board on a regular basis. The Board confirmed during the year
that there were no situations of which they were aware which
would, or potentially could, give rise to conflicts with the
interests of the Company, other than those that might arise from
directors’ other appointments, which are set out in the directors’
biographies on pages 28 to 29.
Committees
The Board has delegated authority to its princip committees
to carry out certain tasks as defined in each committee’s
respective terms of reference. The written terms of reference
in respect of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination
Committees are available on the Company’s website. The
Board is satisfied that the terms of reference for each of these
committees satisfy the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. The terms of reference of the princip
committees are reviewed on an on-going basis.
The minutes of committee meetings are made available to all
directors on a timely basis. In addition, at each Board meeting,
the chairmen of each of the principal committees provide the
Board with a brief synopsis of the work carried out by the
committee, if any, between Board meetings.
In addition to the princip committees, the Board is supported
by the work of the Group Executive Committee and its
subcommittees. Together these committees form a fundamental
element of the Company’s corporate governance framework,
although they are not formally appointed committees of the
Board. The Group’s governance structure is set out below. A
brief explanation of the work of the Group Executive Committee
and the other management committees is set out below:
al
al
al
39
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Group Executive Committee
The responsibilities, structure and composition of the Group
Executive Committee were reviewed and amended during the
year. The Committee consists of the executive directors, the
CEO, Productivity and Development, and the CEO, Group
Sourcing and Offer. The Committee meets formally ten times
a year under the chairmanship of the Group Chief Executive.
The members’ details are set out on page 30.
The Committee’s primary focus is the strategic direction of the
Group. In addition, the Committee monitors top talent within the
business and reviews key items requiring formal Board approval
including dividend planning, key projects and strategic
capex decisions.
In accordance with its formal terms of reference, the Group
Executive Committee is also responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board on:
• strategic and business plans of individual businesses;
• the Group’s capital structure and funding;
• strategic capital expenditure proposals, major acquisitions
or disposals of businesses;
• the Group’s key risks;
• management development and senior executive succession
plans; and
• the Group’s corporate responsibility programme.
During the year, the Committee met seven times and, in
addition to its standing agenda, reviewed:
• the Group’s branding strategies and Group procurement and
sourcing arrangements;
• UK pension reform and the curtailment of the Group’s final
salary pension scheme and enhancement of the defined
contribution scheme;
• operating budgets and monthly trading performance;
• the Group’s IT strategy and planning;
• the Group’s Irish business and the examinership process;
• strategy for embedding sustainability into Group
behaviours; and
• HR proposals for management development and
succession planning.
Group Operating Board
The Group Operating Board was established following a review
of the work of the Group Executive Committee in March 2013,
and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Group’s businesses. In addition, the Group Operating Board
reviews the overall financial performance of the Group against
its strategic plans and budget. The Group Operating Board will
also review people-related activities as part of its structured
agenda, and will conduct deep-dive reviews of key areas
affecting the business. The Group Operating Board, which
meets monthly, comprises all the members of the Group
Executive Committee, the CEOs of B&Q UK & Ireland,
Castorama France and Brico Dépôt brands, the Group
Human Resources Director, and the Finance Director
of the Brico Dépôt and Castorama brands.
Kingfisher Capex Committee
The Capex Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving all capital expenditure projects relating to property
and non-property proposals in excess of an agreed threshold,
which is reviewed periodically. The decisions of the Committee
are reported to the Board following each meeting, and the
Committee will make recommendations to the Board regarding
all projects exceeding its agreed approval threshold. The
Committee comprises the Group Chief Executive, Group
Finance Director, Group Property Director, CEO, Group
Productivity and Development, the Group General Counsel,
and the Head of Property Finance.
Financial Initiatives, Tax and Treasury Committee
The primary purpose of the Committee is to monitor compliance
of policies and control issues relating to Group Finance, and to
review key proposals from Group Finance, Treasury, Tax and
Secretariat functions, and where appropriate recommend
certain initiatives for approval to the Board. The Committee
comprises the Group Finance Director, Group Finance and
Planning Director, Group Treasurer, Group Tax Director, Head
of Group Pensions, Head of Corporate Development, Group
General Counsel, Company Secretary and Group Audit and
Risk Director.
Details of each of the Board’s princip committees, including
membership, are set out in the following reports.
al
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
40
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the report of the Audit Committee for
2012/13. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board from
amongst its non-executive directors, and its princip duties are
to provide effective oversight and governance of the internal
control and risk management processes of the Company, to
review the financial statements and related accounting policies,
review the effectiveness of the internal and external audit
functions and provide updates and recommendations to
the Board.
During the year, the Committee continued the analysis of
the Company’s risks and associated mitigating controls and
focused on compliance, financial governance and internal audit
functions. It maintained its good working relationship with the
Group Audit and Risk Management Director, the Group Finance
and Planning Director, the Company Secretary and Group’s
external auditor, Deloitte LLP. The Committee maintained,
reviewed and where necessary amended its standing agenda,
which is linked to the Group’s financial calendars.
In order to improve the understanding of their operations,
during the year the Committee received in-depth presentations
from management of the Group’s Operating Companies in
the UK, France, Spain, Russia and Turkey, including the
key strategic risks impacting each business. The Committee
considered and reviewed the Group’s adequate procedures
in relation to bribery and corruption, the provision of a
whistleblowing service and approved accounting judgements
in relation to the curtailment of the Kingfisher final salary
pension scheme.
A fuller description of the operations of the Committee is set
out below. I will be available at the Annual General Meeting to
answer any questions about the work of the Committee.
For and on behalf of the Committee
Andrew Bonfield
Chairman of the Audit Committee
25 March 2013
Committee composition
The Audit Committee comprises four non-executive directors:
Andrew Bonfield (Chairman)
Anders Dahlvig
Janis Kong
Mark Seligman
All Committee members are considered independent in
accordance with provision B.1.1 of the UK Corporate
Governance Code.
Audit Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Andrew Bonfield (Chairman) 11/02/2010 4 of 4
Anders Dahlvig 16/12/2009 3 of 4
Janis Kong 11/02/2011 4 of 4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 4 of 4
Duties
In accordance with its terms of reference, the Audit Committee
is required, amongst other things, to:
monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Group;
review, understand and evaluate the Group’s internal financial
risk, and other internal controls and their associated systems;
monitor and review the effectiveness of the Group’s internal
audit function on an annual basis;
oversee the relationship with the external auditor,
making recommendations to the Board in relation to their
appointment, remuneration and terms of engagement;
agree the scope of the auditor’s annual audit programme
and review the output; and
monitor and review the external auditor’s independence,
objectivity and effectiveness and to approve the policy
on the engagement of the external auditor to supply
non-audit services.
The Committee’s terms of reference were reviewed during the
year and are considered fit for purpose and reflect best practice.
No amendments were recommended to the Board following the
latest review. The terms of reference are available on the
Company’s website.
Governance
In accordance with the requirements of provision C.3.1 of the
UK Corporate Governance Code, Andrew Bonfield is designated
as the Committee member with recent and relevant financial
experience. All other members of the Audit Committee are
deemed to have the necessary ability and experience to
understand financial statements. The attendance by members
at Committee meetings is set out above.
All members of the Committee receive appropriate induction,
in addition to the induction which all new directors receive.
The induction programme includes an overview of the business,
its financial dynamics and risks. New Committee members
also obtain access to the Group’s operations and staff,
and all members of the Committee undertake on-going
training as required.
The Committee is required, under its terms of reference, to
meet at least three times a year. During the year, the Committee
met four times. The Committee has a standing agenda linked to
events in the Group’s financial calendar for consideration at
each meeting, and within the annual audit cycle, to ensure that
its work is in line with the requirements of the UK Corporate
Governance Code. At the invitation of the Committee, the
Chairman of the Board and the Group Chief Executive attended
all meetings, as did the Group Finance Director, Group Audit
and Risk Management Director, Group Finance and Planning
Director and the external auditor. Private meetings were
also held with the external and internal auditors at which
management were not present.
al
Audit Committee Report
41
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Detailed below is the key work undertaken by the Committee
during the year under review and up to the date of this
Annual Report.
Activities of the Audit Committee during the year
Governance processes
The Committee conducted an externally facilitated questionnaire
based review of its effectiveness during the year. The Committee
considered the results of the review at its meeting in January
2013, and concluded that it continued to operate effectively
and provide robust challenge and support to the Board. It was
agreed by the Committee that no specific actions were required.
Internal controls and risk
The Committee received and considered reports during the
year from the Group’s external auditor, Deloitte LLP, and the
Group’s internal audit function on the work they had undertaken
in reviewing and auditing the Group, in order to assess the
quality and effectiveness of the internal control system.
The Committee considered reports on the output from the
Group-wide process used to identify, evaluate and mitigate
risks and reviewed the annual report on the Group’s systems of
internal control and their effectiveness, and reported the results
of the review to the Board. Further information on the Group’s
risk management and internal control procedures can be found
on page 42.
As part of the Committee’s continuing programme to increase
its awareness of the Group’s operations and to understand the
implementation of Operating Company control processes, the
Committee met with and received presentations from the senior
management of the operating companies in the UK, France,
Spain, Russia and Turkey. In addition, the Committee continued
to monitor the progress on the standardisation and improvement
of the Group’s internal control processes, in a number of
key areas.
The Group operates a whistleblowing helpline which allows
employees within the Group to make disclosures about
suspected financial and operational improprieties. The
“SpeakUp” service was relaunched in 2012 and expanded
during the year to be available to the Group’s suppliers. The
Audit Committee reviewed the Group’s overall whistleblowing
arrangements to ensure they remained effective, at its meeting
in January 2013. The Committee reviewed the output from the
service and considered the number and type of incidents
reported, and was satisfied that the Group continued to
maintain adequate mechanisms for recording disclosures.
Financial reporting
The Committee reviewed the annual and interim financial
statements during the year. As part of this review, the
Committee considered significant accounting policies, financial
reporting issues and judgements (including those disclosed in
note 3 to the financial statements), together with the reports
received from the external auditor on their findings, including
any control observations relevant to their audit work. The impact
on the Group’s financial statements of significant corporate
governance and accounting standards applicable during the
year, were considered and reviewed by the Committee.
Group Internal Audit
The Committee considered and reviewed updates from the
internal audit programme at each of its meetings during the
year. Reports from the internal audit function to the Committee
included updates on the Group’s risk management systems,
findings from reviews, and reviews of the remit, organisation,
annual plan and resources of the internal audit function. During
the year, the Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the
internal audit function. The review was conducted using an
internal questionnaire with input from the function’s key
stakeholders within the Group, in addition to the Committee.
No significant issues were highlighted by the review.
External Audit
Deloitte LLP were appointed as the external auditor to the
Group in 2009 following a formal tender process.
During the year, the Committee agreed the approach and scope
of the audit work to be undertaken by the external auditor and
undertook an assessment of their qualification, expertise and
resources, independence and the effectiveness of the external
audit process. The Committee also reviewed and agreed the
terms of engagement, the fees, and areas of responsibility and
the work to be undertaken by the external auditor, and agreed
the fees payable in respect of the 2012/13 audit work. Details
of the amounts paid to the external auditor for their audit
services are given in note 7 to the accounts on page 75.
Each of the Group’s businesses is consulted on the
effectiveness and independence of the external auditor
annually. In addition, the external auditor provides the Committee
with a schedule of each matter on which there was an initial
difference between them and management in relation to the
accounting treatment, and with the final decisions on these
issues. The Committee has reviewed and is satisfied with the
effectiveness and independence of the external auditor.
In addition to their statutory duties, the services of Deloitte LLP
are also engaged where, as a result of their position as external
auditor, they either must, or are best placed to, perform
the work in question. This is primarily work in relation to
matters such as shareholder circulars, Group borrowings,
tax advice, regulatory filings and certain business acquisitions
and disposals. Other work is awarded on the basis of
competitive tendering.
The Committee reviewed and approved the scope of non-audit
services provided by the external auditor to ensure that there
was no impairment of independence and objectivity, and
subsequently monitored the non-audit work performed to
ensure it was within policy guidelines.
The Group has a policy on the use of its external auditor for
non-audit work and this is regularly reviewed. The external
auditor is precluded from engaging in non-audit services that
would compromise their independence or violate any laws or
regulations affecting their appointment as external auditor.
The approval of the Chairman of the Committee is required
prior to awarding contracts for non-audit services to the
external auditor, where in excess of specified amounts.
The external auditor reports to the Committee annually on
their independence from the Company. Periodic rotation
of key audit partners is also required.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
42
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
The Group’s policy on the use of the external auditor for
non-audit work can be found on the Company’s website.
The Committee has recommended to the Board that Deloitte
LLP be proposed for re-appointment by shareholders as the
Company’s external auditor at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting. As a result of its work during the year, the Committee
has concluded that it acted in accordance with its terms of
reference and has ensured the independence and objectivity
of the external auditor.
During the year, Deloitte LLP charged the Group £1.6m
(2011/12: £1.4m) for audit and audit-related services and a
further £0.4m (2011/12: £0.5m) for non-audit services during
the year.
Accountability, Risk Management and Internal Control
Internal control
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of
internal control, which is designed to safeguard the assets of the
Group and ensure the reliability of the financial information for
both internal use and external publication, and to comply with
the Turnbull guidance and the UK Corporate Governance Code.
The Board confirms that it has reviewed the effectiveness of
the internal control system, including financial, operational and
compliance controls and risk management in accordance
with the UK Corporate Governance Code, for the period from
29 January 2012 to the date of approval of this Annual Report.
If significant losses were to be incurred during the year as a
result of a failure of controls, a detailed report would be provided
to the Audit Committee and the Board. The Board confirms that
no significant weaknesses were identified in relation to the
review carried out during the year and therefore no remedial
action was required.
The Board has approved a set of policies, procedures and
frameworks for effective internal control. The Group has
procedures for the delegation of authorities for significant
matters to ensure approval is sought at the appropriate level.
These procedures are subject to regular review and provide an
on-going process for identifying, evaluating and managing the
significant risks faced by the Group. Such a system is designed
to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve
business objectives and can provide only reasonable and not
absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The responsibility for designing, operating and monitoring the
system and the maintenance of effective control is delegated
to the management of each Operating Company. The Group’s
enterprise-wide risk management and reporting process helps
Group management to identify, assess, prioritise and mitigate
risk. Management at each Operating Company has
responsibility for the identification and evaluation of the
significant risks applicable to their business and any mitigating
actions to be taken. The Group Executive Committee reviews,
identifies and evaluates the risks that are significant at a Group
level, as well as the mitigating actions against those risks. These
are then considered by the Board. The types of risks identified
included both strategic and material operational risks and are
detailed on pages 25 to 27 of the report.
Management is required to apply judgement in evaluating the
risks facing the Group in achieving its objectives, in determining
the risks that are considered acceptable to bear, in assessing
the likelihood of those risks materialising, in identifying the
Group’s ability to reduce the incidence and impact on the
business of risks that do materialise, and in ensuring the
costs of operating particular controls are proportionate to
the benefit provided.
Monitoring
There are clear processes for controlling and monitoring the
system of internal control and reporting any significant control
failings or weaknesses together with details of corrective action.
These include:
an annual planning process and regular financial reporting,
comparing results with plan and the previous year on a
monthly and cumulative basis;
written reports from the Group Chief Executive and
Group Finance Director submitted at each Board meeting;
Operating Company management report formally to the Audit
Committee on a regular basis on the control environment in
their business and actions taken to maintain or improve the
environment as appropriate; and
reports and presentations to the Board on certain areas
of specialist risk. These include treasury, insurance, tax
and pensions.
A formal quarterly certification is provided by the CEO and
finance director of each Operating Company stating that
appropriate internal controls were in operation and confirming
compliance with Group policies and procedures. Any
weaknesses are highlighted and the results are reviewed by
Operating Company management, the Group Audit and Risk
Management Director, the Group Finance and Planning
Director, the Audit Committee and the Board. The internal
audit function monitors and selectively checks the results of
this exercise, ensuring that representations made are consistent
with the results of its work during the year.
The internal audit function follows a planned programme of
reviews that are aligned to the Group’s risks. The function:
works with the Operating Companies to develop, improve and
embed risk management tools and processes into their
business operations;
reports directly to the Audit Committee and has the authority
to review any relevant part of the Group;
oversees the operation of the individual operating businesses’
audit committees; and
provides the Audit Committee and the Board with objective
assurance on the control environment across the Group.
Risk appetite
During the year, the Board also considered the nature and level
of risk that it was prepared to accept in order to deliver business
strategies, and has reviewed and approved the Group’s internal
statement of risk appetite. This describes both the current
and desired levels of acceptable risk, supported by high level
qualitative risk statements, ensuring that risks are proactively
managed to the level desired by the Board.
43
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Committee composition
The Committee comprises the Chairman and all the non-
executive directors and meets periodically as required. External
advisors may be invited to attend meetings when particular
issues are to be considered. During the year the Committee met
four times. The members of the Nomination Committee are:
Daniel Bernard (Chairman)
Andrew Bonfield
Pascal Cagni
Clare Chapman
Anders Dahlvig
Janis Kong
Mark Seligman
Nomination Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Daniel Bernard (Chairman) 24/05/2006 3 of 4
Andrew Bonfield 11/02/2010 3 of 4
Pascal Cagni 17/11/2010 4 of 4
Clare Chapman 02/12/2010 4 of 4
Anders Dahlvig 19/12/2009 3 of 4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 3 of 4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 4 of 4
Directors did not attend meetings where their reappointment was considered.
Duties
The primary purpose of the Nomination Committee is to lead, on
behalf of the Board, the process for Board appointments and to
make recommendations for maintaining an appropriate balance
of diversity and skills on the Board. In accordance with its terms
of reference, the Nomination Committee is required to:
review the structure, size and composition of the Board
and make recommendations to the Board, as appropriate;
identify the balance of skills, knowledge, diversity and
experience on the Board and nominate candidates to fill
Board vacancies;
review the time commitment required from the
non-executive directors;
consider succession planning, taking into account the
challenges and opportunities facing the Group and the
future skills and expertise needed on the Board; and
review the leadership needs of the organisation, both
executive and non-executive, with a view to ensuring the
continued ability of the organisation to compete effectively
in the marketplace.
The Committee’s terms of reference are reviewed
regularly, approved by the Board, and are available on
the Company’s website.
Activities during the year
During the year, the Committee conducted a rigorous search
and selection process, carried out with the assistance of an
independent executive search company, Blackwood, to identify
suitable candidates for the role of Group Finance Director.
Candidates with a background in retail or fast moving consumer
goods were considered preferable, and the Nomination
Committee considered a shortlist of internal and external
candidates before proposing the appointment of Karen Witts
as Group Finance Director. In making its appointment
recommendations to the Board, the Nomination Committee
reviewed the overall balance of skills, knowledge, experience
and diversity on the Board against current and future
requirements of the Company. Having satisfied itself that both
Euan Sutherland and Philippe Tible possessed the necessary
balance of skills, knowledge and experience to support the
relevant roles and responsibilities of a director of a UK listed
company, the Committee recommended and supported their
appointment to the Kingfisher plc Board as executive directors.
At its meeting in June 2012, the Committee considered the
reappointment of Daniel Bernard for a further three-year period
following the expiry of his second three-year term as a director.
The Committee agreed that he continued to provide strong and
effective leadership to the Board and recommended he be
reappointed for a further three-year term.
The reappointment of Andrew Bonfield, Anders Dahlvig and
Janis Kong, following the expiry of their three-year terms of
appointment as directors, was also considered by the
Committee at its meeting in November 2012. The Committee
concluded that all directors continued to provide the necessary
balance of skills and experience to the Board including
considerable financial and retail experience, and in-depth
knowledge of the workings of the Group. The Committee
therefore recommended to the Board that each be reappointed
as a director of the Company for an additional three-year term.
The Committee received and reviewed a talent and HR
update from the Group HR Director, which outlined succession
planning and talent pipeline considerations in support of
the Group’s Creating the Leader strategy.
Following the changes to the composition of the Board
during the year, the Committee firmly believes that the current
composition represents a strong, well balanced and diverse
Board. The Board membership is made up of specialists in
retail, technology, finance and human resources, and possesses
considerable knowledge, experience and skills to meet the
current and future requirements of the Group. The Chairman
will be available at the Annual General Meeting to answer any
questions about the work of the Committee.
Daniel Bernard
Chairman of the Nomination Committee
25 March 2013
Nomination
Committee Report
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
44
GOVERNANCE
Corporate governance continued
Full details of the Remuneration Committee composition,
role, authority and activities during the year are set out in the
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. The report
will be subject to an advisory vote by shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting on 13 June 2013.
The Chairman of the Committee will be available at the Annual
General Meeting to answer any questions about the work of
the Committee.
Remuneration Committee meeting attendance
From Attendance
Clare Chapman (Chairman) 16/02/2011 4 of 4
Daniel Bernard 03/06/2009 4 of 4
Andrew Bonfield 17/06/2010 3 of 4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 4 of 4
Relationship with shareholders
Relations with shareholders
The Company is committed to communicating its strategy
and activities clearly to its shareholders and, to that end,
maintains an active dialogue with investors through a planned
programme of investor relations activities. The investor relations
programme includes:
formal presentations of full-year and interim results;
conference calls to discuss quarterly trading statements;
regular meetings between institutional investors and senior
management to ensure that the investor community receives
a balanced and complete view of the Group’s performance
and the issues faced by the Group;
hosting investors’ and analysts’ sessions at which
senior management from relevant Operating Companies
deliver presentations which provide an overview of their
individual businesses;
responding to enquiries from shareholders through the
Company’s investor relations team;
regular meetings with institutional investors and analysts
by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director
to discuss business performance; and
a section dedicated to shareholders on the Company’s website.
The Chairman, the Senior Independent Director and the
chairmen of the Board’s Committees are available to meet
major investors on request. The Senior Independent Director
has a specific responsibility to be available to shareholders
who have concerns, and for whom contact with the Chairman,
Group Chief Executive or Group Finance Director has
either failed to resolve their concerns, or for whom such
contact is inappropriate.
As part of his formal induction as Senior Independent Director,
Mark Seligman met a number of the Group’s significant
shareholders to obtain a better understanding of their views.
Annual General Meeting
The principal means of communication with private investors is
by electronic communications and through the Annual General
Meeting, which is attended by all the Company’s directors,
and allows all shareholders present the opportunity to question
the Chairman and the directors, as well as the chairmen of
the Board’s Committees. After the Annual General Meeting,
shareholders have the opportunity to meet informally
with directors.
A summary business presentation is given at the Annual
General Meeting before the Chairman deals with the formal
business of the meeting. At the Annual General Meeting in
June 2013, the Chairman will use his discretion to call for
a poll on all resolutions. The results of the poll in relation to
all resolutions will be disclosed to those in attendance at the
meeting, published on the Company’s website and announced
to the London Stock Exchange shortly after the conclusion of the
Annual General Meeting.
Remuneration
Committee Report
45
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Dear Shareholder
This is my first full year as Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee, and I am very pleased to present the Company’s
2012/13 Directors’ Remuneration Report on behalf of the Board.
Better Homes, Better Lives
Kingfisher’s purpose is to make it easier for customers to
have better, more sustainable homes. Our short hand for this is
“Better Homes, Better Lives”. Success in achieving this means
delivering value to our shareholders, behaving responsibly in the
communities in which the Group operates, making sustainable
choices, and creating fulfilling and secure roles for our
employees. The Remuneration Committee is committed to
structuring remuneration for executives that supports and
drives this purpose.
Ensuring value is a theme which is central to the working of the
Remuneration Committee, and although this report focuses on
the executive directors, we also look more broadly to ensure
alignment and fairness between contribution and reward. This
means that, by improving the business, all can benefit. This is
also true for employees and, at Kingfisher, performance-linked
incentives and share-based plans are cascaded throughout the
organisation from the leadership team to store-based employees.
During 2012/13 our reported results were affected by adverse
currency movements, the particularly poor summer weather in
Northern Europe, which dampened customer demand during our
peak season, and the economic uncertainty our customers are
facing across Europe. It was therefore no surprise that 2012 was
difficult for retailers in general. As a consequence, annual bonus
payments made to the executive directors for the year will be
between 58% and 80% of salary and in the region of 29% and
40% of the maximum opportunity. Performance in the last four
years has been extremely strong and reward reflects this. The
Sharesave awards, which vested in 2012/13, are a good example
of this with over 2,000 employees benefiting from a total
estimated gain of around £34 million, giving an average profit per
person of around £1,600. The three-year performance period of
awards granted in 2010 under the Performance Share Plan
(‘PSP’) ended on 5 May 2013. In respect of the awards granted
to executive directors, vesting levels were between 50% and
100% and were linked to performance over the past three years.
The Committee set stretching long-term targets for awards
granted under the Performance Share Plan (the ‘PSP’) in 2011
as part of the Creating the Leader phase of Kingfisher’s strategy.
This one-off award has created a strong focus on a single
performance period, which aligns to the next phase of the Group’s
strategy. Further details about how this strategy is being reflected
in our remuneration structure are provided later in this report.
2013 Remuneration review
During the year under review, there have been no major
changes to the Group’s remuneration policy. In order to ensure a
continued strong alignment between executive directors’ and
shareholders’ interests, the Committee will conduct a full review of
the Company’s executive remuneration arrangements during
2013. The key focus of this review will be to determine what form
of long-term incentive arrangements should replace the current
Performance Share Plan when the next awards are due to be
made in 2014. The Committee will ensure that it has due regard
to developments in market and best practice, and to appropriately
link such awards to the Group’s strategic objectives. It is also
committed to consulting with its major shareholders and key
representative bodies as part of this process. No significant
changes to remuneration policy are planned for 2013/14.
Remuneration reporting
During the year under review, the Department for Business,
Innovation & Skills (‘BIS’) has continued to develop its proposals
to improve the transparency of remuneration reporting, and to
give shareholders greater influence over future remuneration
policy. The Company believes that linking pay to Group
performance, and dialogue with shareholders are fundamental
to the remit of the Remuneration Committee. Whilst the
final regulations on remuneration reporting have yet to be
determined, we believe that the Company already addresses
many of the proposals, and where new disclosure would be
required, have decided to incorporate many of these within
this year’s report ahead of the requirement to do so.
I will be available at the AGM in June to answer any questions
about the work of the Committee.
At our 2012 AGM, 98% of shareholders voted in favour of our
Directors’ Remuneration Report, and I very much hope you will
support the 2012/13 Directors’ Remuneration Report at our
forthcoming meeting.
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
25 March 2013
“
WE STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT LINKING PAY TO GROUP
PERFORMANCE, AND DIALOGUE WITH SHAREHOLDERS
ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO THE REMIT OF THE
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE.
”
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
For a PDF of the Directors’ Remuneration Report, go to
http://annualreport.kingfisher.com/2012-13
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
46
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
This report has been prepared on behalf of the Board by the
Remuneration Committee (the ‘Committee’), and has been
prepared in accordance with the Large and Medium-sized
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations
2008 (the ‘Regulations’) issued under the Companies Act
2006 (the ‘Act’), and describes how the Board has applied the
principles relating to directors’ remuneration set out in the UK
Corporate Governance Code, and complied with the Financial
Services Authority Listing Rules. Although not yet mandatory,
the report also seeks to adopt the key aspects of the reporting
obligations proposed by BIS, whilst recognising that the final
requirements may not be exactly as we have assumed based on
the latest information available to us. Included in this year’s
report are, based on our understanding of the likely final
position, a single figure table detailing the total remuneration
for the executive directors and a scenario chart detailing future
potential remuneration of executive directors at below threshold,
target, and maximum levels of performance. We have also
provided a version of the remuneration policy table as
prescribed by BIS. The Remuneration Report for 2013/14
will be fully compliant with the final BIS regulations, which will
likely require the report to be split into separate policy and
implementation reports.
The Remuneration Committee
Role and responsibilities
The Committee’s primary purpose is to make recommendations
to the Board on the Group’s framework or broad policy
for executive remuneration and its costs. The Board has
delegated responsibility to the Committee for determining the
remuneration, benefits and contractual arrangements of the
Chairman, executive directors, certain senior executives, and
the Company Secretary, and for overseeing the Group’s share-
based incentive schemes and bonus schemes. The
remuneration of non-executive directors is determined
by the Chairman and executive members of the Board.
The Committee recommends and monitors the structure and
levels of remuneration of senior managers throughout the
Group. It also ensures that contractual terms on termination,
and any payments made are fair to the individual and the
Group, ensuring that failure is not rewarded, and that the
departing manager’s duty to mitigate is fully recognised.
The Committee is committed to the principles of accountability
and transparency, and to ensuring remuneration arrangements
demonstrate a clear link between reward and performance.
Remuneration is structured to promote sustainable growth and
to avoid excessive and inappropriate risks. Operating under
delegated authority from, and reporting to the Board, its
activities are governed by terms of reference which can be
found on the Company’s website. The Committee’s terms of
reference are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that they
remain fit for purpose, and continue to be in line with market
best practice.
Membership
The Committee comprised the following independent non-
executive directors during the financial year to 2 February 2013.
Chairman
Clare Chapman
Committee members
Daniel Bernard
Andrew Bonfield
Janis Kong
Meetings
The Committee is required by its terms of reference to meet at
least twice a year, and maintains a rolling standing schedule of
agenda items for the year. An overview of key standing agenda
items for the Committee’s annual meetings is set out below.
During the year, the Committee met four times. Committee
meetings were attended by the Group Chief Executive, who
provided advice that materially assisted the Committee. In
addition, the Group Human Resources Director and the Head
of Group Reward attended Committee meetings, and provided
material assistance and advice on remuneration policy. The
Group Finance Director attended by invitation on matters
relating to performance measures. The Company Secretary
acted as Secretary to the Committee. No member of the
Committee had a personal financial interest (other than as a
shareholder), conflict of interest arising from cross-directorships,
or day-to-day involvement in running the business, and no
person took part in any discussion about his or her own
remuneration. Details of individual attendance at Committee
meetings are provided within the Corporate Governance
Report on page 44.
Following a robust evaluation of the Committee during the
year, it was agreed that the Committee continued to operate
effectively. Full details of the evaluation process are set out
within the Corporate Governance Report on page 37.
Remuneration Committee calendar for 2012/13
Month Activities
February 2012
Vesting of PSP awards
Consideration of bonus design
Annual bonus awards – provisional results
March 2012
LTIP performance measures outcome
Approval of bonus targets
Bonus outturn for the year
Review of 2011/12 Remuneration Report
September 2012
Remuneration strategy
Ratification of KIS and PSP awards made earlier
in the year
Review of standing agenda schedule
Approval of Sharesave invitation
January 2013
Annual salary review
Measures for bonuses for forthcoming year
Review of the performance of the Committee
Review of Chairman’s fees
47
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Activities
During 2012/13 the Committee:
agreed the performance targets for the annual bonus in the
financial year and monitored progress against those targets;
agreed the operation of the long-term incentive plans and
policy for executive share scheme awards to new recruits,
and promotions, including the level of individual awards,
performance conditions, and measurement and validation
of the out-turn of prior year awards;
agreed the award of annual incentives based on the prior
year’s performance;
recommended the 2011/12 Directors’ Remuneration
Report for endorsement by the Board and subsequent
approval by shareholders;
approved the Directors’ Shareholding Policy;
agreed amendment to the pension policy for employees
reaching lifetime allowance;
approved amendments to the rules of the Store Management
Incentive Share Scheme (‘SMISS’); and
reviewed the Company’s remuneration strategy.
Objectives for 2013:
In addition to its annual agenda for 2013, the Committee has
scheduled an additional meeting to:
review the executive remuneration arrangements; and
to consider and agree a new long-term incentive plan for
the Company.
Advisors
The Committee has authority to obtain the advice of external
independent remuneration consultants, and is solely
responsible for their appointment, retention and termination.
In February 2013, following a robust tender process, the
Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its
principal advisor. During the financial year to 2 February
2013, the following external advisors provided services to the
Committee. Unless otherwise stated, the advisors have no other
connection with the Group, and the Committee firmly believes
that the advice received was, and continues to be, objective
and independent:
FIT Remuneration Consultants LLP (‘FIT’)
FIT provided advice on the ongoing operation of employee and
executive share plans, and executive remuneration generally.
FIT is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group (the
professional body for executive remuneration consultants) and
adheres to its Code of Conduct. FIT provided no other services
to the Group during the year.
Allen & Overy LLP (‘A&O’)
A&O provided legal advice to the Committee on service
and employment contracts, and for other employment and
remuneration issues. A&O also provides advice to the Group
on other legal matters.
Towers Watson
Towers Watson provided benchmarking on the market
competitiveness for executives in the UK and overseas. Towers
Watson also provided advice to the Group on pensions and
related matters.
Remuneration Policy
The Group’s remuneration strategy is to attract, retain and
motivate executives of the highest quality, incentivising them to
deliver exceptional performance aligned with the interests of
shareholders, and to deliver the Group’s business plan. The
remuneration strategy continues to ensure that a significant
element of executives’ remuneration remains ‘at risk’.
The key principles of the Group’s remuneration policy are to:
provide executives with a remuneration package that
recognises the experience of the individual concerned and
the role fulfilled;
ensure performance-related remuneration constitutes
a substantial proportion of the remuneration package;
encourage a high-performance culture by offering
substantial reward only for exceptional performance;
ensure executive directors’ interests are aligned with
shareholders’ by delivering rewards in shares with
compulsory deferral and share ownership guidelines;
be competitive in the market in which the Group competes;
be fair and transparent; and
ensure remuneration arrangements apply consistently
throughout the Group.
The Committee intends to continue this policy and is
satisfied that there is an appropriate balance between the
fixed and variable elements of remuneration, as described
within this report.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
48
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Alignment of Remuneration Framework to Group Strategy
The chart and policy table below summarises how the Group’s remuneration framework is aligned to and supports the Creating
the Leader strategy:
Creating the Leader – Group Strategy Creating the Leader – Success Measures
Easier 1. Making it easier for customers to improve their home
2. Giving our customers more ways to shop
Easier
Like-for-like sales growth
Unique web users
Common 3. Building innovative common brands
4. Driving efficiency and effectiveness everywhere
Common
% of Group sales direct sourced
% of Group sales common
Retail profit margin
Expand 5. Growing our presence in existing markets
6. Expanding in new and developing markets
Expand
Kingfisher Economic Profit (KEP)
One Team 7. Developing leaders and connecting people
8. Sustainability: becoming ‘Net Positive’
One Team
Group employee engagement scores
‘Net Positive’ sustainability dashboard
Remuneration Policy Table
Remuneration for executive directors for the financial year commencing 3 February 2013 consists of the following elements:
Element and Purpose Policy and Opportunity Operation and Performance Metrics
1 Base salary
This is the core element of pay
that reflects the individual’s
role, experience and
contribution to the Group.
Salaries are reviewed in January each year and are
benchmarked against a range of suitable comparator
groups, which currently include both the FTSE100 as a
whole and FTSE100 retailers as a relevant sub-set. The
Committee is also informed of pay levels in other large
European retailers.
The Committee does not apply a strict mathematical
approach to the data, which it considers to be only one
relevant input. Instead, the Committee has regard to its
overall assessment of what appropriate levels of salary
are, having regard to market and economic conditions,
affordability, the level of increases awarded to employees
generally and the individual’s contribution.
Base salaries are paid monthly in cash.
The base salaries of executive directors effective
from 31 January 2013 are as follows:
Ian Cheshire – £832,320
Kevin O’Byrne – £627,000
Philippe Tible – £486,840
Karen Witts – £484,500
2 Pension and benefits
To provide competitive
retirement benefits.
To aid retention and
remain competitive within
the marketplace.
Executive directors’ pension provision is by way of
contributions to defined contribution arrangements
equivalent to 30% of base salary for the Group CEO
and 20% for all other UK-based executive directors.
Prior to 1 July 2012, the Group CEO also participated in a
Defined Benefit (‘DB’) arrangement up to the scheme
earning cap of £136,200. The Defined Contribution
(‘DC’) arrangement then applied to the excess of his
salary. Following the closure of the DB scheme to future
accrual the pension arrangement moved solely to the
DC arrangement of 30% of the total salary.
Philippe Tible participates in a DB arrangement.
Entitlement to a pension is conditional on him remaining
with the Company until retirement (minimum age of 62).
The Company provides the following benefits: car
or car allowance, allowance for financial planning,
medical insurance and life assurance cover equal
to four times base salary.
The cost of benefit elements provided to executive
directors is disclosed in the table on page 52.
3 Annual bonus
To incentivise executives
to achieve/exceed annual
financial, strategic and
personal objectives set by
the Committee at the start
of each financial year.
Annual bonus is delivered under the Kingfisher Incentive
Share Scheme (KIS).
The KIS comprises the ‘KIS Cash Scheme’ and the ‘KIS
Share Scheme’.
Senior executives may receive a performance-related
cash bonus under the KIS Cash Scheme, and a
contingent share award under the KIS Share Scheme,
in the proportion of 67% payable in cash and 33% in
deferred shares.
The on-target and maximum bonus payable are 100%
and 200% of base salary respectively.
The maximum level of bonus payable has remained
unchanged since 2006.
For the 2013/14 financial year, the performance
KPIs for the annual bonus are split as follows:
PROFIT 30% (year-on-year).
RELATIVE LIKE-FOR-LIKE SALES 30% (with
reference to movements in market size to
ensure real improvements in market share
are being rewarded).
DIRECT SOURCING & PRODUCTIVITY 20%.
PERSONAL OBJECTIVES 20% (Assessed
with reference to demonstrating the One
Team behaviours).
49
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Policy Table continued
Element and Purpose Policy and Opportunity Operation and Performance Metrics
3 Annual bonus continued The deferred shares have a three-year vesting period and
can be subject to forfeiture should the executive leave the
Group during the vesting period. Claw-back can apply
should the Committee decide the grant of deferred shares
was not justified.
On vesting, dividend ‘roll-up’ shares are available on
the same basis as described below for the Performance
Share Plan.
The profit and sales measures for Kevin O’Byrne
and Philippe Tible will be based on the results from
their respective divisions.
4 Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’)
To incentivise executives
to achieve superior returns
for shareholders.
Performance conditions are
aligned with shareholder
interests and the Group’s
strategic objectives.
Retention of executives over
the performance period of
the awards.
The general policy is for awards to be granted on an
annual basis, subject to a three-year vesting period
and stretching performance conditions.
The maximum annual award is 200% of base salary,
or 500% of base salary in exceptional circumstances.
Consistent with the Creating the Leader strategy, a one-off
award of 500% of salary was made in June 2011. This
single award replaced the 200% annual awards which
would have taken place in 2011, 2012 and 2013. This
creates focus on a single three-year period which matches
the Creating the Leader phase and is smaller than the
three annual awards would have been. The award vests
in two equal tranches in June 2014 and June 2015.
Shares delivered on the exercise of an award receive
additional dividend ‘roll-up’ shares calculated on the
basis of a notional purchase of shares on each relevant ex-
dividend date using that day’s closing mid-market price.
Vesting of the awards made in June 2011 is based
50% on EPS and 50% on KEP (a version of
economic profit as explained on page 56).
The EPS performance condition for the 2011
awards requires EPS at the end of the three-year
vesting period to be at least 25.8p for 15% of that
part of the award to vest and 31.2p for 100% of
that part of the award to vest.
The KEP performance condition requires the
Group’s aggregate KEP over the three-year
performance period to be at least £229 million for
15% of that part of the award to vest and £386
million for 100% of that part to vest.
Any exchange rate upsides/downsides are removed
from the results, since they are deemed to be
outside the executive directors’ control.
5 Shareholding requirements
To ensure alignment of
interests of executives and
shareholders over the
long term.
Executive directors are required to build a significant
shareholding in the Company before the fifth anniversary
of the date of their appointment. This is a minimum of
200% of base salary by January 2013 for Ian Cheshire,
100% of base salary by October 2013 for Kevin O’Byrne
and Philippe Tible; and 100% of base salary by 1 October
2017 for Karen Witts. For Philippe Tible this is an increase
from his position of 50% of salary to be met by April 2009,
prior to his appointment to the Board.
Performance metrics are not applicable.
The net value of vested but unexercised awards
held under the PSP count towards this requirement
as well as shares held under the KIS Share Scheme
which have no additional performance conditions.
Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’ Byrne have satisfied
their shareholding requirements as at the date of
this report.
6 Recruitment policy
To attract the services of the
most appropriate candidate
for the job whilst following the
principles of the Company’s
remuneration policy to the
extent possible.
It is difficult to be overly prescriptive regarding the
appropriate package for an unknown potential recruit.
The following is the Committee’s agreed policy but it may
need to be adapted in the event of recruitment in order to
obtain the services of the most appropriate candidate.
In principle, the pay of any new recruit would be
assessed following the same principles as for the
current executive directors.
The Committee would be mindful of best practice
guidelines in considering whether any enhanced PSP or
other award was necessary on recruitment (e.g. to buyout
awards forgone from the incoming executive’s previous
employer) and the appropriateness of performance
conditions in order to avoid paying more than it considers
necessary to secure the preferred candidate. However,
each case will need to be considered on its own facts at
the particular time.
As necessary to secure the appropriate candidate.
In the case of Karen Witts, who was recruited
during 2012/13, she was granted a PSP award
linked to our Creating the Leader strategy on a
time pro-rated basis according to the remaining
proportion of the vesting period. The awards she
forfeited on leaving her previous employer were
not bought out.
7 Chairman and non-executive
director fees
To attract and retain a
Chairman and non-executive
directors of the highest calibre.
The fees paid to the Chairman are determined by the
Remuneration Committee, while the fees of the non-
executive directors are determined by the Board with
affected persons absenting themselves as appropriate.
The Chairman’s fees are determined by reference to his
time commitment and relevant benchmark market data.
The Board determines non-executive directors’ fees under
a policy which seeks to recognise the time commitment,
responsibility and technical skills required to make a
valuable contribution to an effective Board.
The Board will review fees paid to non-executive directors
in similar companies and will review fees for non-executive
directors in February each year.
Details of the Chairman’s fees and the fees of non-
executive directors’ are disclosed on page 58.
Fees are paid monthly.
Non-executive directors do not participate in
any of the Company’s performance related pay
programmes. Non-executive directors are not
entitled to any compensation for loss of office.
The basic fee for non-executive directors effective
1 February 2013 is £61,200. Additional fees are
paid as follows:
Senior Independent Director – £17,425
Chairman of the Audit Committee – £20,000
Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee – £15,000
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
50
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Estimates of total future potential remuneration from 2013 remuneration packages
The tables and charts below provide estimates of the potential total future remuneration for each executive director in respect of the
remuneration opportunity granted to them in 2013/14. Potential outcomes based on different performance scenarios are provided
for each executive director.
Ian Cheshire
Value of package (£m)
LTIP Bonus Pension Bene?ts Salary
Total Remuneration Performance Charts
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Kevin O’Byrne
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Philippe Tible
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
Karen Witts
Value of package (£m)
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Maximum
Target
Below
Threshold
Composition of overall package (%)
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100
Notes:
Salary: Base salary as at 31 January 2013.
Bene?ts: Estimate based on bene?ts received during 2012/2013.
Pension: Based on pension of 30% of salary for Ian Cheshire and of 20% of salary for Kevin O’Byrne. Philippe Tible’s pension is based on that for 2012/2013.
Bonus: 2013/2014 target and maximum award levels in accordance with plan rules. Nil payout for below threshold performance. Bonus includes both the cash
award and the deferred share element.
LTIP: Estimated value at target and maximum vesting based on proposed 2013/2014 performance measures. Nil payout for below threshold performance.
Share price movement has not been incorporated into the above ?gures.
+ Salary Salary Bene?ts Bene?ts + + +
Total
Remuneration
Bonus Bonus LTIP LTIP =
Pensions Pensions
0 20 40 60 80 100
51
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Performance scenarios
Below Threshold On-Target Maximum
Only the fixed pay elements (base salary,
benefits and pension) of the package are earned.
Minimum performance targets for the KIS and
PSP are not achieved.
Fixed pay elements plus on-target KIS plus
on-target PSP vesting.
KIS on-target performance is achieved,
resulting in a bonus of 50% of maximum –
100% of base salary.
For the PSP, the on-target vesting level is 55%
of maximum – 110% of base salary.
Fixed pay elements plus maximum KIS plus
maximum PSP award vesting.
KIS maximum is 200% of base salary.
PSP maximum is 200% of base salary on a
normal annual grant.
Total Shareholder Returns
The above graph shows Kingfisher’s total shareholder return (‘TSR’) for the five years to 2 February 2013, which assumes that
£100 was invested in Kingfisher on 2 February 2008. The Company chose the FTSE100 Index as an appropriate comparator for
this graph as Kingfisher has been a constituent of that index throughout the period.
Source: Thomson Reuters.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
King?sher FTSE 100
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
52
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Executive Directors’ Appointments, Terms & Remuneration
Executive directors’ service contracts
Provision Policy
Contract dates Ian Cheshire: 28 January 2008
Kevin O’Byrne: 1 October 2008
Philippe Tible: 1 October 2012
Karen Witts: 1 October 2012
Notice period 12 months’ notice by either the director or the Company.
Termination payment Ian Cheshire: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 15% of annual salary
(1)
. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Kevin O’Byrne: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 12% of annual salary
(1)
. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Philippe Tible: Termination terms are determined by the convention collective which applies to all French employees. A
termination payment would be made up of two parts: (i) the dismissal indemnity which is 3% of annual remuneration per
year of service and (ii) a payment for any unpaid notice which would be a maximum of three months’ remuneration. The
combination cost based on years of service to date is in the region of one times salary. Remuneration consists of base pay,
car benefit and cash bonus award.
Karen Witts: On a phased basis at a monthly rate of 8.3% of annual salary. For a maximum of 12 months from the
termination date.
Mitigation For UK-based executive directors, lower amounts are payable if the director commences lower-paid employment during the
12-month period following cessation of employment, and payments cease immediately when employment providing the
same or higher value remuneration is started.
Remuneration As described in this report.
Other benefits Car or car allowance and allowance for financial planning.
Non-cash benefits The Company provides a range of additional benefits, including medical insurance, life assurance cover equal to four times
base salary, a subsidised staff canteen, a staff discount card and 30 working days’ holiday per year.
Expenses Reimbursement of reasonably incurred costs in accordance with their duties.
Non-compete During employment and for 12 months after leaving. In respect of Philippe Tible, an amount equal to 50% of annual salary
and car benefit must be paid to him on a monthly basis following his termination of employment by the Company. This
amount is standard under French law in order to ensure that the non-compete provision is enforceable.
(1) The terms of the phased payments clauses appearing in the service contracts of Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’Byrne were in keeping with the governance
guidelines at the time the employee contracts were made. The Committee will keep its policy under review when appointing new directors and will carefully
consider the prevailing governance guidelines and legal requirements when structuring contracts for new directors.
Executive Directors’ Remuneration
The remuneration of the executive directors for the 2012/13 financial year is set out in the table below:
£’000 Salary Pension
Other
benefits
Bonus
(KIS)
(4)
Actual
remuneration
for 2012/13
Actual
remuneration
for
2011/12
(2)
PSP
(7)
Total
remuneration
for
2012/13
Ian Cheshire 816.0 253.1 30.8 502.7 1,611.5
(1)
2,616.0 1,011.4 2,622.9
Kevin O’Byrne 600.0 117.9 24.9 345.6 1,088.4 1,869.4 727.0 1,815.4
Euan Sutherland
(5)
600.0 120.0 24.6 – 744.6 1,729.0 – 744.6
Philippe Tible
(5),(6)
436.1 306.0 11.2 346.8 1,100.1 1,554.3 753.9 1,854.0
Karen Witts
(3)
158.3 31.7 8.7 97.5 296.2 – – 296.2
In additional to the Schedule 8 requirements, the table presents a total single figure and break down for the year per the proposed BIS regulations.
(1) Includes £8,888, the net equivalent gain following the exercise of 91,350 phantom options awarded in April 2002.
(2) The comparative figure for 2011/12 has been restated to include employer contributions into director’s pension arrangements.
(3) Karen Witts joined the Group on 1 October 2012.
(4) One third of the bonus awarded will be deferred into Kingfisher shares under the KIS Share Scheme and accordingly will be available to vest in April 2016.
(5) Euan Sutherland and Philippe Tible joined the Board on 1 October 2012. The table contains their total remuneration for the entire financial year rather than
from the date they joined the Board.
(6) Philippe Tible’s remuneration is paid in Euros and is converted to Sterling for the purpose of the table at the average exchange rate over the course of the
relevant year.
(7) The 2010 PSP vested post year-end on 5 May 2013 and was based on 50% EPS and 50% on relative TSR performance for Ian Cheshire and Kevin
O’Byrne, and divisional Retail Operating Profit for Philippe Tible. The out-turn of the EPS and Divisional Retail Operating Profit elements of the award was
100% of maximum based on strong Group performance over the three-year performance period. The TSR performance out-turn fell just below the median
of the FTSE 100 comparator group and so failed to meet the threshold of median +1%. Accordingly, the vesting levels for the 2010 PSP award were 50% of
award for Ian Cheshire and Kevin O’Byrne, and 100% for Philippe Tible. The award granted to Euan Sutherland will lapse in full following his departure
from the Group on 31 March 2013.
53
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
53
www.kingfisher.com
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Business Review
Governance
Accounts
Outcome for the 2012/13 Annual Bonus Scheme
The executive directors’ targets for the 2012/13 bonus were based on both corporate and individual objectives as set out below.
Measure Like-for-Like sales
Group operating
profit after tax KPI
Personal
performance
Weighting at maximum bonus 30% 30% 20% 20%
The KPI measure was Group sourcing achievement.
The outcomes achieved against each measure are summarised below.
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
(1)
Kevin O’Byrne
(2)
Philippe Tible
(2)
Measure
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
% of maximum
potential bonus target
Profit/like-for-like sales objectives 0 0 0 15
KPI / Personal Performance 77 77 72 77
Total 31 31 29 40
(1) The bonus earned by Karen Witts was pro-rated from her date of joining the Group on 1 October 2012.
(2) The bonuses earned by Kevin O’Byrne and Philippe Tible were based upon performance of their Divisions.
Euan Sutherland forfeited rights to a bonus following his resignation.
Further details of the awards under the KIS Cash Scheme and KIS Share Scheme reflecting these outcomes for 2012/13 are set out
on page 55.
Directors’ pension benefits
Up until 30 June 2012, Ian Cheshire had an entitlement to part of his pension benefits through the Kingfisher defined benefit
pension scheme, which closed to future accrual of benefits on 30 June 2012 (subject to the scheme cap of £136,200 (2011/12:
£129,600)) and part through a defined contribution scheme, for which the Company contribution is 30% of base salary. From 1
July 2012 onwards his pension benefit was delivered solely through the Defined Contribution arrangement.
Kevin O’Byrne, Euan Sutherland and Karen Witts have an entitlement to a defined contribution pension, with a Company
contribution of 20% of base salary.
The Company operates a policy to limit pension contributions during the tax year up to the Annual Allowance, with the excess being
directed into a taxable monthly cash payment. Following pension and tax legislation changes effective 6 April 2012 on the reduction
of lifetime allowance from £1.8m to £1.5m, the Company has offered a fully taxable cash alternative, at no additional cost to the
Company, to directors wishing to exit the Defined Contribution scheme completely.
Kevin O’Byrne chose to leave the pension scheme on 5 April 2012 and opted to receive the Company pension contribution as a
taxable monthly cash supplement in full.
Philippe Tible is a member of a separate Group defined benefit pension scheme, for which eligibility requires him to retire with the
Kingfisher Group. There is therefore no concept of a deferred pension and if Philippe Tible left the Company for reasons other than
retirement, none of the pension rights built up would actually crystallise. The figures in the table below are based on a crystallised
pension and have not been discounted in any way for the risk of forfeiture.
The following table shows details required under both Schedule 8 to the Regulations under the Act and the Listing Rules as
they apply to Kingfisher for the year ended 2 February 2013. In respect of the Act, the details shown represent for the defined
benefit section:
• accrued pension benefits at the relevant dates;
• the increase in the amount of accrued pension during this year;
• the transfer value amounts as at 28 January 2012 and 2 February 2013; and
• the increase in transfer value between those dates, net of member contributions paid.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
54
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Accrued pension Transfer value
Age
Years in
service
Increase in
accrued
pension
£’000 pa
2012/13
£’000 pa
2011/12
£’000 pa
Increase in
transfer
value £’000
(net of
director’s
contribution)
2012/13
£’000
2011/12
£’000
Increase in
(3)
accrued
pension
£’000 pa
(net of
inflation)
Ian Cheshire
(1),(2)
53 14 2 33 32 72 596 519 0
Philippe Tible 61 9 26 152 126 537 2,810 2,272 24
The above table relates only to benefits accrued in the Final Salary section, and excludes any Money Purchase section or AVC benefits.
(1) Accrued pensions and transfer values include employer contributions (by way of bonus surrender) made in March 2004 of £15,000.
(2) Ian Cheshire’s pension benefit under the defined benefits scheme is based on a salary cap of £136,200 for the part year to 30 June 2012, when the
scheme was closed to future accrual.
(3) Addition information given to comply with the requirements of the listing rules.
The following table shows the employer contributions made to the defined contribution scheme, or cash alternative in relation to
service during the financial year to 2 February 2013:
Employer contributions to
defined contribution pension
scheme Cash alternative
(1)
Total
£’000 2012/13 2011/12 2012/13 2011/12 2012/13
Ian Cheshire 7.4 49.4 230.7
(2)
156.8 238.1
Kevin O’Byrne 3.3 36.7 114.6 83.3 117.9
Euan Sutherland 9.5 21.7 110.5 83.3 120.0
Karen Witts – n/a 31.7 n/a 31.7
(1) Following pension and tax legislation changes, effective 6 April 2011, tax relief on the value of pension contributions and defined benefit accrual has been
limited to £50k p.a. The Company has offered, as an alternative to contributions into the defined contribution pension scheme, a taxable cash payment to
the executive directors at no additional cost to the Company.
(2) The payment to Mr Cheshire includes a goodwill payment received following the closure of the Kingfisher defined benefit scheme and his transfer to the
Kingfisher defined contribution scheme. This payment was offered to all employees on the same terms.
55
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Long-Term Incentive Plans
KIS Share Scheme
Awards of contingent shares, in respect of the financial year ended 2 February 2013, were made post year-end in April 2013
(to vest in April 2016), to Ian Cheshire, Kevin O’Byrne, Philippe Tible and Karen Witts under the KIS Share Scheme to the value
of £167,552, £115,200, £115,603 and £32,511, respectively. As the awards will be made after publication of the accounts for
the financial year ended 2 February 2013, the detail will be disclosed in next year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Once the contingent share awards are made in respect of the bonus earned, the only qualifying condition for the award normally
to vest is to be in the employment of the Company at the vesting date.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market value
of shares at
date of grant
(p)
At start
of year
Awarded
in year
Dividend
roll-up
shares
awarded
during year
(1)
Exercised
in year
Lapsed in
(5)
year
At end
of year Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 21/04/2009 164.63 263,698 – 5,784 269,482
(2)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 260,971 – 8,808 – – 269,779 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 156,578 – 5,284 – – 161,862 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – – 11,400 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 170,495 5,753 – – 176,248 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 692,276 170,495 26,000 269,482 – 619,289
Kevin O’Byrne 21/04/2009 164.63 67,378 – 1,477 68,855
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 187,573 – 6,330 – – 193,903 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 112,211 – 3,787 – – 115,998 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – – 11,400 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 125,364 4,230 – – 129,594 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 378,191 125,364 16,195 68,855 – 450,895
Euan Sutherland
(5)
21/04/2009 164.63 99,782 – 2,188 101,970
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 163,601 – 5,521 – 169,122 – 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 91,524 – 3,088 – 94,612 – 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
06/05/2011
(3)
279.60 11,029 – 371 – 11,400 – 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 111,688 3,770 – 115,458 – 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 365,936 111,688 14,938 101,970 390,592 –
Philippe Tible 21/04/2009 164.63 170,241 – 3,734 173,975
(4)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
06/04/2010 216.81 125,558 – 4,237 – – 129,795 06/04/2013 06/04/2017
06/05/2011 279.60 106,360 – 3,589 – – 109,949 06/05/2014 06/05/2018
25/04/2012 298.33 – 85,498 2,885 – – 88,383 25/04/2015 25/04/2019
Total 402,159 85,498 14,445 173,975 – 328,127
(1) The price used to calculate the number of dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p per share, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p per share,
being the market price on 10 October 2012.
(2) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (2 July 2012) was 288.4p per share.
(3) The KIS Share Awards granted over 10,917 shares on 6 May 2011 underpin options granted under the CSOP, further details of which can be found in
the section entitled ‘Company Share Option Plan’.
(4) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (1 June 2012) was 273.4p per share.
(5) All awards held by Euan Sutherland under the Scheme lapsed on his resignation on 19 December 2012.
Company Share Option Plan (‘CSOP’)
Included as an element of the KIS Share awards, the executive directors were granted options under the CSOP, an HMRC approved
plan. The CSOP is underpinned, in part, by a matching fixed value element of the KIS Share awards granted on the same date in
2011. On exercise, the proceeds of part of the KIS Share award are used to fund the exercise price of the CSOP award, providing
tax and NIC advantages for participants and potential NIC savings for Kingfisher at no additional cost to the Group. The total value
of the KIS Share award is not changed.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
At start
of year
Granted
during year
Exercised
during year
Lapsed
during
the year
At end
of year
Option price
(p)
(1)
Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 06/05/2011 10,917 – – – 10,917 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
Kevin O’Byrne 06/05/2011 10,917 – – – 10,917 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
Euan Sutherland 06/05/2011 10,917 – – 10,917
(2)
– 274.8 06/05/2014 06/11/2014
(1) The option price per share was calculated by reference to the average closing mid-market price of Kingfisher shares on the three dealing days immediately
before the date of grant.
(2) The award lapsed on Euan Sutherland’s resignation on 19 December 2012.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
56
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’)
The PSP remains the primary long-term share incentive plan for senior executives, which allows a maximum annual award not
exceeding 200% of base salary or 500% of base salary in exceptional circumstances.
Shares delivered on the vesting of an award receive additional dividend ‘roll-up’ shares calculated on the basis of a notional
purchase of shares on each relevant ex-dividend date using that day’s closing mid-market price. Shares used to satisfy awards
under the PSP are normally purchased in the market by the Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market
value of
shares at
date of
grant (p)
At start
of year
Awarded
in year
Dividend
roll-up
shares
awarded
during
year
(1)
Exercised
during year
Shares
lapsed
during
the year
At end
of year Vesting period Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 21/04/2009
(3)
164.63 1,052,697 – 26,294 725,000
(2)
25,265 328,726 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 698,914 – 23,589 – – 722,503 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,517,585 – 51,222 – – 1,568,807 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,269,196 – 101,105 725,000 25,265 2,620,036
Kevin O’Byrne 01/10/2008
(4)
126.60 721,503 – 24,353 – – 745,856 01/10/2011 01/10/2015
01/10/2008
(4)
126.60 721,503 – 24,353 – – 745,856 01/02/2012 01/10/2015
21/04/2009
(3)
164.63 756,624 – 17,048 681,145
(7)
18,159 74,368 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 502,343 – 16,955 – – 519,298 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,115,871 – 37,662 – – 1,153,533 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,817,844 120,371 681,145 18,159 3,238,911
Euan Sutherland 24/07/2008
(4)
112.87 1,460,832 – 32,560 1,493,392
(8)
– – 24/07/2012 24/07/2015
21/04/2009
(4)
164.63 493,450 – 10,823 504,273
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 327,614 – 11,057 – 338,671
(10)
05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 1,115,872 – 37,662 – – 1,153,534
(10)
17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 3,397,768 – 92,102 1,997,665 1,492,205
Philippe Tible 21/04/2008
(4)
126.63 936,778 – 20,548 957,326
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2015
21/04/2009
(4)
164.63 394,898 – 8,662 403,560
(7)
– – 21/04/2012 21/04/2016
05/05/2010
(5)
246.02 260,473 – 8,791 – – 269,264 05/05/2013 05/05/2017
17/06/2011
(6)
264.60 611,984 – 20,656 – – 632,640 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
03/05/2012
(9)
290.16 – 245,722 2,840 – – 248,562 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total 2,204,133 245,722 61,497 1,360,886 1,150,466
Karen Witts 16/10/2012
(11)
271.37 – 498,857 – – – 498,857 17/06/2014 17/06/2015 17/06/2018
Total – 498,857 – – 498,857
(1) The price used to calculate the dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p per share, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p per share, being the
market price on 10 October 2012.
(2) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (2 July 2012) was 288.4p per share.
(3) Following the calculation of the achievement of the performance conditions attaching to the award, 97.6% of the award became exercisable.
(4) Following the calculation of the achievement of the performance conditions attaching to the award, 100% of the award became exercisable.
(5) Vesting of the awards is based 50% on EPS and 50% on TSR conditions. The EPS condition required EPS at the end of the three-year performance period
to be at least 20p for 15.625% of that part to vest and 23p for vesting in full of that part of the award. The TSR condition requires the Group’s TSR to be
at least median plus 1% for 15.625% to vest and upper quintile plus 1% for it all to vest. In both cases, intermediate performance vests on a sliding scale
basis. Philippe Tible’s award was based on the retail operating profit for his division the targets for which are aligned with the Group EPS targets. The
results which were confirmed after the year-end are shown in the Executive Directors’ Remuneration table.
(6) Vesting of the awards is based 50% on EPS and 50% on Kingfisher Economic Profit (‘KEP’). The EPS condition requires EPS at the end of the three-year
performance period to be at least 25.8p for 15% of that part to vest and 31.2p for vesting in full of that part of the award. The KEP condition required the
aggregate KEP over the three-year performance period to be at least £229 million for 15% of that part to vest and £386 million for vesting in full of that part
of the award. KEP is defined as the (Group post-tax retail profit less central costs, excluding exceptional items and property lease costs) – (two point average
of Group capital employed, including capitalised property leases and adjusted for pensions, multiplied by the Group’s lease adjusted WACC). 50% of the
vested shares will be released to participants in 2014 with the remaining 50% of the shares released in 2015. Philippe Tible’s award is based on these
50% Group measures and 50% on divisional retail operating profit and KEP measures which are aligned to the Group targets.
(7) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (1 June 2012) was 273.4p per share.
(8) Euan Sutherland exercised the award in two tranches. The market value of Kingfisher shares on the dates of exercise (24 July 2012 and 8 January 2013)
were 253.9p and 286.9p per share respectively.
(9) The additional award was made to Philippe Tible in recognition of the expansion of his role to bring him into line with other members of the Group executive
who received an award of 500% of salary compared to the original award Philippe received of 375% of salary. Vesting of the award will be dependent on
the same performance criteria as the award made on 17 June 2011.
(10) The awards held by Euan Sutherland will lapse following his departure from the Company on 31 March 2013.
(11) Karen Witts received an award under the PSP 2011 based on 285% of base salary. This was a time pro-rated award equivalent to the 500% award the
other executive directors received based on her joining date of 1 October 2012, partway through the vesting period.
57
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Award of Matching Shares to Ian Cheshire
As part of the terms of his appointment as Group Chief Executive in 2008, a one-off award was made to Ian Cheshire pursuant to
Listing Rule 9.4.2. Ian Cheshire purchased 266,667 shares in the Company and in turn received a Matching Award of 200% of
base salary (broadly a 4:1 match). The vesting of the Matching Award was subject to performance conditions relating to growth
in EPS over the vesting period. The Matching Award vested in full shortly after the 2011/12 financial year end as EPS over the
performance period exceeded the target for the maximum vesting of 19.6p.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
Market value of
shares at date of
grant At start of year
Dividend roll-up
shares awarded
during year
(1)
At end of year Vesting date Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 01/02/2008 143.6p 1,257,444 42,442 1,299,886 01/02/2012 01/02/2015
(1) The price used to calculate the dividend roll-up shares was 290.4p, being the market price on 2 May 2012, and 267.2p being the market price on 5
October 2012.
Sharesave Scheme
A Sharesave Scheme is open to all eligible employees, including executive directors. As is the case with all savings-related share
option schemes, there are no performance criteria.
Number of ordinary shares
Name Date of grant
At start
of year
Granted
during year
Exercised
during year
At end
of year
Option price
(p)
Date from which
exercisable Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 26/10/2011 4,522 – – 4,522 199.0 01/12/2014 01/06/2015
Total 4,522 – – 4,522
Kevin O’Byrne 03/11/2009 5,263 – 5,263
(1)
– 172.4 01/12/2012 01/06/2013
22/10/2012 – 4,147 – 4,147 217.0 01/12/2015 01/06/2016
Total 5,263 4,147 5,263 4,147
Euan
Sutherland
(2)
03/11/2009 5,263 – 5,263
(1)
– 172.4 01/12/2012 01/06/2013
22/10/2012 – 4,147 – 4,147 217.0 01/12/2015 01/06/2016
Total 5,263 4,147 5,263 4,147
(1) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (3 December 2012) was 276p per share.
(2) The option held by Euan Sutherland will lapse in full following his departure from the Company on 31 March 2013.
Closed incentive plans
Executive share options
There are outstanding awards under the Executive Share Option Scheme. This plan is now closed and no further awards will be
made. The full details of the plan can be found in previous Annual Reports. The performance conditions for all awards under this
plan have now been met. The last grants under the Executive Share Option Scheme were made on 17 April 2003. The outstanding
awards are as follows:
Number of ordinary shares
Date of grant At start of year
Exercised
during year At end of year
Option price
(p)
Date from which
exercisable Lapse date
Ian Cheshire 09/04/2002 91,350
(2)
91,350
(1)
– 290.08 09/04/2005 09/04/2012
08/10/2002 164,144 164,144
(3)
– 194.95 08/10/2005 08/10/2012
17/04/2003 134,538 – 134,538 237.85 17/04/2006 17/04/2013
Total 390,032 255,494 134,538
Philippe Tible 17/04/2003 52,105 – 52,105 237.85 17/04/2006 17/04/2013
Total 52,105 – 52,105
(1) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (26 March 2012) was 312.3p per share.
(2) A phantom option over 91,350 shares was granted to Ian Cheshire in addition to this option at the same option price, with the same performance
conditions and over the same maturity periods. On exercise, a net equivalent cash gain of £8,888 was paid as remuneration at that time and is disclosed
in the directors total remuneration table on page 52.
(3) The market value of Kingfisher shares on the date of exercise (24 September 2012) was 269.6p per share.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
58
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Dilution limits
Kingfisher’s share plans contain limits that set out the quantum of newly issued shares that may be used to satisfy awards granted
under those plans. These limits are in line with the current Association of British Insurers (‘ABI’) guidance on headroom limits
which provide that overall dilution under all plans should not exceed 10% over a ten-year period in relation to the Company’s issued
share capital, with a further limitation of 5% in any ten-year period on executive plans. The Company has always operated within
these limits.
Outside appointments for Executive Directors
Subject to the rules governing conflicts of interest, the Company encourages its executive directors to hold non-executive roles
outside the Group as it recognises that such roles can broaden their experience and knowledge, which can be of benefit to the
Group. Subject to the Committee’s agreement, any fees may be retained by the individual. Kevin O’Byrne is a non-executive
director, Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Land Securities Group plc, and is paid £60,000,
£10,000 and £17,500 respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees.
Ian Cheshire is a non-executive director and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee of Whitbread plc, and is paid £55,000 and
£15,000 respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees. In January 2011, Ian Cheshire was invited to act as the lead
non-executive member of the Department for Work and Pensions Board. He waives his fee for this role.
Euan Sutherland is a non-executive director of the Co-operative Food board and became a director of SuperGroup plc on
1 December 2012. He is paid £51,950 and £50,000 per annum respectively for fulfilling these roles and retains these fees.
Chairman and Non-Executive Directors’ Terms and Fees
Chairman
Daniel Bernard was appointed Chairman on 3 June 2009, for an initial fixed three-year term, which was extended for an
additional three-year term on 14 June 2012 and will continue until June 2015, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the
Company’s Articles of Association, or by either party giving the other not less than six months’ prior written notice. His appointment
is documented in a letter of appointment and he is required to devote no fewer than two to three days a week to his duties as
Chairman. His appointment as Chairman will automatically terminate if he ceases to be a director of the Company. His fee,
determined by reference to his time commitment and relevant benchmark data, was set at €485,000 per annum with effect from
February 2012 and increased in line with salary increases to employees generally to €494,700 with effect from February 2013.
The Chairman’s fee is paid to a service company, Provestis, which also receives a monthly contribution of €5,150 towards the
cost of running the Chairman’s office in Paris. The Chairman’s remuneration is reviewed by the Remuneration Committee on
an annual basis.
Non-executive directors’ letters of engagement
Non-executive directors are appointed under letters of engagement. Appointments have historically been for an initial period of
three years and invitations to act for subsequent three-year terms are subject to a review of performance, and taking into account
the need to progressively refresh the Board.
The appointment may be terminated by either party giving the other not less than three months’ prior written notice, unless
terminated earlier in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, and the Company has no obligation to pay
compensation when their appointment terminates.
The Board determines the fees paid to non-executive directors under a policy which seeks to recognise the time commitment,
responsibility and technical skills required to make a valuable contribution to an effective Board. The Board will also review
information on fees paid to non-executive directors in similar companies. Non-executive director’s fees were reviewed by the
Board in January 2013 and the basic fee for a non-executive director was increased by 2% to £61,200 with effect from
February 2013. Future annual reviews of fees for non-executive directors will be conducted in January each year.
The non-executive directors do not participate in any of the Company’s performance-related pay programmes.
Non-executive remuneration
Current Directors Date of appointment Expiry of current term
Total length of service at
2 February 2013
Fee 2012/13
£’000
Fee 2011/12
£’000
Daniel Bernard
(1)
24/05/2006 30/06/2015 6 years 8 months 393.5 399.9
Andrew Bonfield 11/02/2010 15/12/2015 2 years 11 months 80.0 73.8
Pascal Cagni 17/11/2010 16/11/2013 2 years 2 months 60.0 56.4
Clare Chapman 02/12/2010 01/12/2013 2 years 1 month 75.0 32.3
Anders Dahlvig 16/12/2009 15/12/2015 3 years 1 month 60.0 56.4
Janis Kong 08/12/2006 06/12/2015 6 years 1 month 60.0 56.4
Mark Seligman 01/01/2012 31/12/2014 1 year 1 month 77.4 6.1
Total Remuneration 805.9 681.3
(1) Daniel Bernard’s fee is paid in Euros, and the fee is converted to Sterling for the purpose of this table at the average exchange rate over the course of the
relevant year.
59
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
Directors’ interests
The beneficial interests of the directors who held office at 2 February 2013 in the ordinary shares of Kingfisher plc are shown below:
Ordinary shares
2 February 2013
Ordinary shares
28 January 2012
Daniel Bernard 120,766 113,629
Andrew Bonfield 10,000 10,000
Pascal Cagni 30,000 –
Clare Chapman 6,990 –
Ian Cheshire 1,147,527 1,126,423
Anders Dahlvig 75,000 75,000
Janis Kong 24,000 24,000
Kevin O’Byrne 141,431 136,168
Mark Seligman 15,000 –
Philippe Tible 104,968 –
Karen Witts 58,186 –
As potential beneficiaries under the Kingfisher Employee Benefit Trust (the ‘Trust’), Ian Cheshire, Kevin O’Byrne, Philippe Tible
and Karen Witts are deemed to have an interest in the Company’s ordinary shares held by the Trust. The Trust held 20.7 million
ordinary shares at 2 February 2013.
There have been no further changes in the above interests between 2 February 2013 and 25 March 2013.
There are no other non-beneficial interests.
In the independent auditor’s report on page 99, Deloitte LLP refers to the parts of the Directors’ Remuneration Report that are
subject to audit. These comprise the following sections in this report: the disclosures under headings ‘Executive directors’
remuneration’, ‘Directors’ pension benefits’, ‘KIS Share Scheme’, ‘Company Share Option Plan’, ‘Performance Share Plan’, ‘Award
of Matching Shares to Ian Cheshire’, ‘Sharesave Scheme’, ‘Closed incentive plans’, ‘Non-executive remuneration’ and ‘Directors’
interests’ on pages 52 to 59.
For and on behalf of the Committee
Clare Chapman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
60
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated income statement
Year ended 2 February 2013
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Notes
Before
exceptional
items
Exceptional
items
(note 5) Total
Before
exceptional
items
Exceptional
items
(note 5) Total
Continuing operations:
Sales 4 10,573 – 10,573 10,831 – 10,831
Cost of sales (6,618) – (6,618) (6,748) – (6,748)
Gross profit 3,955 – 3,955 4,083 – 4,083
Selling and distribution expenses (2,766) (17) (2,783) (2,769) (9) (2,778)
Administrative expenses (524) (9) (533) (560) – (560)
Other income 36 – 36 33 (3) 30
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates 17 20 – 20 32 – 32
Operating profit 721 (26) 695 819 (12) 807
Analysed as:
Retail profit 4 781 (26) 755 882 (12) 870
Central costs (42) – (42) (43) – (43)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and
associates (18) – (18) (20) – (20)
Finance costs (19) – (19) (31) – (31)
Finance income 15 – 15 21 – 21
Net finance costs 6 (4) – (4) (10) – (10)
Profit before taxation 7 717 (26) 691 809 (12) 797
Income tax expense 9 (128) 1 (127) (165) 7 (158)
Profit for the year 589 (25) 564 644 (5) 639
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company 564 640
Non-controlling interests – (1)
564 639
Earnings per share 10
Basic 24.1p 27.5p
Diluted 23.8p 26.9p
Adjusted basic 22.3p 25.1p
Adjusted diluted 22.0p 24.6p
The proposed final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013, subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting, is 6.37p per share.
61
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Year ended 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Profit for the year 564 639
Actuarial (losses)/gains on post employment benefits 27 (29) 20
Currency translation differences
Group 122 (128)
Joint ventures and associates 8 (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value (losses)/gains (14) 10
(Gains)/losses transferred to inventories (8) 8
Tax on other comprehensive income (14) (9)
Other comprehensive income for the year 65 (109)
Total comprehensive income for the year 629 530
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company 629 530
Non-controlling interests – –
629 530
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
62
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Year ended 2 February 2013
Attributable to equity shareholders of the Company
£ millions Notes
Share
capital
Share
premium
Own
shares
held
Retained
earnings
Other
reserves
(note 29) Total
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
At 29 January 2012 372 2,199 (134) 2,869 413 5,719 8 5,727
Profit for the year – – – 564 – 564 – 564
Actuarial losses on post employment benefits 27 – – – (29) – (29) – (29)
Currency translation differences
Group – – – – 122 122 – 122
Joint ventures and associates – – – – 8 8 – 8
Cash flow hedges
Fair value losses – – – – (14) (14) – (14)
Gains transferred to inventories – – – – (8) (8) – (8)
Tax on other comprehensive income – – – (18) 4 (14) – (14)
Other comprehensive income for the year – – – (47) 112 65 – 65
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – 517 112 629 – 629
Share-based compensation – – – 9 – 9 – 9
New shares issued under share schemes 1 5 – – – 6 – 6
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 74 (68) – 6 – 6
Dividends – – – (221) – (221) – (221)
At 2 February 2013 373 2,204 (60) 3,106 525 6,148 8 6,156
At 30 January 2011 371 2,194 (42) 2,390 539 5,452 8 5,460
Profit for the year – – – 640 – 640 (1) 639
Actuarial gains on post employment benefits 27 – – – 20 – 20 – 20
Currency translation differences
Group – – – – (129) (129) 1 (128)
Joint ventures and associates – – – – (10) (10) – (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value gains – – – – 10 10 – 10
Losses transferred to inventories – – – – 8 8 – 8
Tax on other comprehensive income – – – (4) (5) (9) – (9)
Other comprehensive income for the year – – – 16 (126) (110) 1 (109)
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – 656 (126) 530 – 530
Share-based compensation – – – 32 – 32 – 32
New shares issued under share schemes 1 5 – – – 6 – 6
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 25 (23) – 2 – 2
Own shares purchased – – (117) – – (117) – (117)
Dividends – – – (178) – (178) – (178)
Purchase of non-controlling interests – – – (8) – (8) – (8)
At 28 January 2012 372 2,199 (134) 2,869 413 5,719 8 5,727
63
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated balance sheet
At 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Non-current assets
Goodwill 12 2,399 2,397
Other intangible assets 13 166 123
Property, plant and equipment 14 3,748 3,667
Investment property 15 66 55
Investments in joint ventures and associates 17 289 271
Post employment benefits 27 71 25
Deferred tax assets 25 17 23
Derivatives 23 55 66
Other receivables 19 18 17
6,829 6,644
Current assets
Inventories 18 2,083 1,844
Trade and other receivables 19 545 531
Derivatives 23 33 26
Current tax assets 9 1
Cash and cash equivalents 20 398 587
3,068 2,989
Total assets 9,897 9,633
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 21 (2,430) (2,356)
Borrowings 22 (99) (367)
Derivatives 23 (17) (6)
Current tax liabilities (289) (305)
Provisions 26 (35) (16)
(2,870) (3,050)
Non-current liabilities
Other payables 21 (115) (121)
Borrowings 22 (332) (375)
Derivatives 23 (12) (8)
Deferred tax liabilities 25 (303) (269)
Provisions 26 (38) (43)
Post employment benefits 27 (71) (40)
(871) (856)
Total liabilities (3,741) (3,906)
Net assets 4 6,156 5,727
Equity
Share capital 28 373 372
Share premium 2,204 2,199
Own shares held (60) (134)
Retained earnings 3,106 2,869
Other reserves 29 525 413
Total attributable to equity shareholders of the Company 6,148 5,719
Non-controlling interests 8 8
Total equity 6,156 5,727
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013 and signed on its behalf by:
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
Group Chief Executive Group Finance Director
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
64
ACCOUNTS
Consolidated cash flow statement
Year ended 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Operating activities
Cash generated by operations 31 730 827
Income tax paid (129) (148)
Net cash flows from operating activities 601 679
Investing activities
Purchase of businesses – (2)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 4 (316) (450)
Disposal of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 17 9
Interest received 18 19
Dividends received from joint ventures and associates 10 10
Net cash flows from investing activities (271) (414)
Financing activities
Interest paid (18) (22)
Interest element of finance lease rental payments (4) (5)
Repayment of bank loans (31) (10)
Repayment of Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (162) (30)
Payment on financing derivatives – (5)
Capital element of finance lease rental payments (12) (16)
New shares issued under share schemes 6 6
Own shares issued under share schemes 6 2
Own shares purchased – (117)
Purchase of non-controlling interests – (8)
Dividends paid to equity shareholders of the Company (221) (178)
Net cash flows from financing activities (436) (383)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts (106) (118)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts at beginning of year 485 636
Exchange differences 19 (33)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts at end of year 32 398 485
65
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
1 General information
Kingfisher plc (‘the Company’), its subsidiaries, joint ventures
and associates (together ‘the Group’) supply home improvement
products and services through a network of retail stores and
other channels, located mainly in the United Kingdom,
continental Europe and China.
The Company is incorporated in the United Kingdom. The
nature of the Group’s operations and its principal activities are
set out in the Business Review on pages 2 to 27.
The address of its registered office is 3 Sheldon Square,
Paddington, London W2 6PX.
The Company is listed on the London Stock Exchange.
These consolidated financial statements have been approved for
issue by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013.
2 Principal accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of
these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These
policies have been consistently applied to the years presented,
unless otherwise stated.
a. Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company, its
subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are made up to the
nearest Saturday to 31 January each year, except as disclosed
in note 17 and in note 4 of the Company’s separate financial
statements. The current financial year is the 53 weeks ended
2 February 2013 (‘the year’ or ‘2012/13’). The comparative
financial year is the 52 weeks ended 28 January 2012 (‘the
prior year’ or ‘2011/12’).
The directors of Kingfisher plc, having made appropriate
enquiries, consider that adequate resources exist for the Group
to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future
and that, therefore, it is appropriate to adopt the going concern
basis in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended 2 February 2013. Refer to the Directors’ statement
of responsibility on page 33.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the European Union (‘IFRS’) and those parts of the
Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under
IFRS and therefore the consolidated financial statements
comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS legislation.
There are no new standards, amendments or interpretations,
which are mandatory for the first time for the financial year
ended 2 February 2013, that are relevant and material for
the Group.
The following amendments and interpretations, which are
mandatory for the first time for the financial year ended
2 February 2013, are either not currently relevant or not
material for the Group:
• IFRS 1 (amendment), ‘Severe hyperinflation and
removal of fixed dates for first-time adopters’;
• IFRS 7 (amendment), ‘Disclosures – Transfers of
financial assets’; and
• IAS 12 (amended), ‘Deferred tax: Recovery of
underlying assets’.
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the
following new standards, amendments and interpretations,
which have not been applied in these financial statements, were
in issue but not yet effective (and in some cases had not yet
been adopted by the EU):
• IAS 1 (amended), ‘Presentation of items of other
comprehensive income’ (effective from 1 July 2012);
• IAS 19 (revised), ‘Employee benefits’ (effective from
1 January 2013);
• IFRS 1 (amended), ‘First time adoption’ on government
loans (effective from 1 January 2013);
• IFRS 7 (amended), ‘Disclosures – Offsetting financial assets
and financial liabilities’ (effective from 1 January 2013);
• IFRS 13, ‘Fair value measurement’ (effective from
1 January 2013);
• Annual improvements to IFRSs 2011 (effective from
1 January 2013);
• IFRS 10, ‘Consolidated financial statements’ (effective
from 1 January 2014);
• IFRS 11, ‘Joint arrangements’ (effective from
1 January 2014);
• IFRS 12, ‘Disclosure of interests in other entities’
(effective from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 27 (revised), ‘Separate financial statements’ (effective
from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 28 (revised), ‘Investments in associates and joint
ventures’ (effective from 1 January 2014);
• IAS 32 (amendment), ‘Financial instruments: Presentation’
on offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
(effective from 1 January 2014); and
• IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’ (effective from
1 January 2015).
The directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards
listed above will have a material impact on the financial
statements of the Group in future periods, except as follows:
• IAS 19 (revised) will principally impact the measurement and
presentation of defined benefit pension expense/income and
the disclosures for benefit plans. The most significant change
is expected to be the replacement of interest cost and
expected return on scheme assets with a single net finance
cost or return determined by applying the same discount
rate used to measure the defined benefit obligations to the
net defined benefit liability or asset. In addition, the revised
standard will reclassify the administrative costs of running
the UK scheme from net finance costs to operating costs.
The Group’s reported profit before taxation and net assets are
not expected to be materially impacted for 2012/13 (restated)
and 2013/14, however in future years they may be impacted
by the change in the finance cost/return calculation
depending on market interest rates, rates of return
and the mix of scheme assets;
• IAS 1 (amended) will principally require items presented in
‘other comprehensive income’ (OCI) to be grouped together
based on whether items can be reclassified to profit or loss
subsequently. The amendments do not address which items
are presented in OCI;
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
66
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
• IFRS 13 clarifies the measurement of fair value for certain
assets and liabilities as well as the associated disclosures; and
• IFRS 9 will impact both the measurement and disclosures
of financial instruments.
Beyond the information above, it is not practicable to provide
a reasonable estimate of the effect of these standards until a
detailed review has been completed.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
under the historical cost convention, as modified by the use
of valuations for certain financial instruments, share-based
payments and post employment benefits. A summary of the
Group’s principal accounting policies is set out below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
IFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates and
assumptions. It also requires management to exercise its
judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting
policies. The areas involving critical accounting estimates and
judgements, which are significant to the consolidated financial
statements, are disclosed in note 3.
Use of non-GAAP measures
In the reporting of financial information, the Group uses certain
measures that are not required under IFRS, the generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) under which the Group
reports. Kingfisher believes that retail profit, adjusted pre-tax
profit, effective tax rate, adjusted post-tax profit and adjusted
earnings per share provide additional useful information on
underlying trends to shareholders. These and other non-GAAP
measures such as net debt/cash are used by Kingfisher for
internal performance analysis and incentive compensation
arrangements for employees. The terms ‘retail profit’,
‘exceptional items’, ‘adjusted’, ‘effective tax rate’ and ‘net
debt/cash’ are not defined terms under IFRS and may therefore
not be comparable with similarly titled measures reported by
other companies. They are not intended to be a substitute for,
or superior to, GAAP measures.
Retail profit is defined as continuing operating profit before
central costs (principally the costs of the Group’s head office),
exceptional items, amortisation of acquisition intangibles
and the Group’s share of interest and tax of joint ventures
and associates.
The separate reporting of non-recurring exceptional items,
which are presented as exceptional within their relevant income
statement category, helps provide an indication of the Group’s
underlying business performance. The principal items which
are included as exceptional items are:
• non-trading items included in operating profit such as
profits and losses on the disposal, closure or impairment
of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and investments
which do not form part of the Group’s trading activities;
• profits and losses on the disposal of properties; and
• the costs of significant restructuring and incremental
acquisition integration costs.
The term ‘adjusted’ refers to the relevant measure being
reported for continuing operations excluding exceptional items,
financing fair value remeasurements, amortisation of acquisition
intangibles, related tax items and prior year tax items. Financing
fair value remeasurements represent changes in the fair value of
financing derivatives, excluding interest accruals, offset by fair
value adjustments to the carrying amount of borrowings and
other hedged items under fair value hedge relationships.
Financing derivatives are those that relate to underlying items
of a financing nature.
The effective tax rate represents the effective income tax
expense as a percentage of continuing profit before taxation
excluding exceptional items. Effective income tax expense is
the continuing income tax expense excluding tax on exceptional
items and tax adjustments in respect of prior years and the
impact of changes in tax rates on deferred tax.
Net debt/cash comprises borrowings and financing derivatives
(excluding accrued interest), less cash and cash equivalents
and current other investments.
b. Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial
statements of the Company, its subsidiaries, joint ventures
and associates.
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiary undertakings are all entities over which the Group
has the power to govern the financial and operating policies,
generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of
the voting rights. Subsidiary undertakings acquired are recorded
under the acquisition method of accounting and their results
included from the date of acquisition. The results of subsidiaries
which have been disposed are included up to the effective date
of disposal.
The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary
is the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred
and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration
transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting
from a contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related
costs are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business
combination are measured initially at their fair values at the
acquisition date. On an acquisition-by-acquisition basis,
the Group recognises any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s
proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets. Subsequent to
acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests is
the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-
controlling interests’ share of subsequent changes in equity.
Total comprehensive income is attributed to non-controlling
interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having
a deficit balance. Prior to 31 January 2010, losses exceeding
the non-controlling interest in the equity of a subsidiary were
required to be attributed to the parent; the resulting deficit
balances were not restated following amendment to IAS 27,
‘Consolidated and separate financial statements’.
The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of
any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the acquisition-
date fair value of any previous equity interests in the acquiree
over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill. If this is less than the fair value of
the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the case of
a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised directly
in the income statement.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains
on transactions between Group companies are eliminated.
Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction
provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.
Accounting policies of acquired subsidiaries have been
changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the
policies adopted by the Group.
67
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
(ii) Joint ventures and associates
Joint ventures are entities over which the Group has joint
control, with a third party, to govern the financial and operating
activities of that entity. The equity method is used to account for
the Group’s investments in joint ventures.
Associates are entities over which the Group has the ability
to exercise significant influence but not control, generally
accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50%
of the voting rights. The equity method is used to account
for the Group’s investments in associates.
Under the equity method investments are initially recognised at
cost. The Group’s investments in joint ventures and associates
include goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment losses)
identified on acquisition.
The Group’s share of post-acquisition profits or losses is
recognised in the income statement within operating profit,
and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is
recognised in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition
movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of
the investment. When the Group’s share of losses equals or
exceeds its interest, including any other long term receivables,
the Group does not recognise any further losses, unless it has
incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint
venture or associate.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its
joint ventures and associates are eliminated to the extent of the
Group’s interest. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless
the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset
transferred. Accounting policies of joint ventures and associates
have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with
the policies adopted by the Group.
c. Foreign currencies
(i) Presentation and functional currencies
The consolidated financial statements are presented in
Sterling, which is the Group’s presentation currency. Items
included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s
entities are measured using the currency of the primary
economic environment in which the entity operates
(i.e. its functional currency).
(ii) Transactions and balances
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates
prevailing on the date of the transaction or, for practical
reasons, at average monthly rates where exchange rates
do not fluctuate significantly.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Sterling at the rates of exchange
at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences on monetary
items are taken to the income statement. Exceptions to this are
where the monetary items form part of the net investment in a
foreign operation or are designated and effective net investment
or cash flow hedges. Such exchange differences are initially
deferred in equity.
(iii) Group companies
The balance sheets of overseas subsidiary undertakings
are expressed in Sterling at the rates of exchange at the
balance sheet date. Profits and losses of overseas subsidiary
undertakings are expressed in Sterling at average exchange
rates for the period. Exchange differences arising on the
retranslation of foreign operations are recognised in a separate
component of equity.
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the
retranslation of the net investment in foreign entities, and of
borrowings and other currency instruments designated as
hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign
operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in
the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition
of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the
foreign entity and translated at the rates of exchange at the
balance sheet date.
Principal rates of exchange against Sterling:
2012/13 2011/12
Average
rate
Year end
rate
Average
rate
Year end
rate
Euro 1.23 1.15 1.15 1.19
US Dollar 1.59 1.57 1.60 1.57
Polish Zloty 5.13 4.79 4.80 5.04
Chinese Renminbi 10.01 9.80 10.31 9.94
d. Revenue recognition
Sales represent the supply of home improvement products and
services. Sales exclude transactions made between companies
within the Group, Value Added Tax, other sales-related taxes
and are net of returns, trade and staff discounts.
Sales of in-store products are generally recognised at the point
of cash receipt. Where award credits such as vouchers or loyalty
points are provided as part of the sales transaction, the amount
allocated to the credits is deferred and recognised when the
credits are redeemed and the Group fulfils its obligations to
supply the awards.
For delivered products and services, sales are recognised either
when the product has been delivered or, for installation income,
when the service has been performed. Sales from delivered
products and services represent only a small component of
the Group’s sales as the majority relates to in-store purchases
of products.
Other income is generally composed primarily of external rental
income and profits and losses on disposal of assets. Rental
income from operating leases is recognised on a straight line
basis over the term of the relevant lease. Initial direct costs
incurred in negotiating and arranging an operating lease are
added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and
recognised on a straight line basis over the lease term.
e. Rebates
Rebates received from suppliers mainly comprise volume
related rebates on the purchase of inventories.
Volume related rebates are recognised based on actual
purchases in the period as a proportion of total purchases
forecast over the rebate period where it is probable the rebates
will be received and the amounts can be estimated reliably.
Rebates relating to inventories purchased but still held at the
balance sheet date are deducted from the carrying value so
that the cost of inventories is recorded net of applicable rebates.
Such rebates are credited to the income statement when the
goods are sold.
f. Dividends
Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the
Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised
when they are approved by the Company’s shareholders.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
68
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
g. Intangible assets
(i) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising
from assets acquired in a business combination that are
not individually identified and separately recognised.
Such benefits include future synergies expected from the
combination and intangible assets not meeting the criteria
for separate recognition.
Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
Goodwill is not amortised and is tested annually for impairment
by assessing the recoverable amount of each cash generating
unit or groups of cash generating units to which the goodwill
relates. The recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the
net present value of expected future pre-tax cash flows (‘value-
in-use’) or fair value less costs to sell if higher. The discount
rate applied is based upon the Group’s weighted average cost
of capital with appropriate adjustments for the risks associated
with the relevant cash generating unit or groups of cash
generating units. When the recoverable amount of the
goodwill is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is
recognised immediately in the income statement which cannot
subsequently be reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of
an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the
entity sold.
(ii) Computer software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the
basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the
specific software. These costs are amortised over their
estimated useful lives of two to ten years.
Costs that are directly associated with the production of
identifiable and unique software products controlled by the
Group, which are expected to generate economic benefits
exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible
assets. Direct costs include software development, employee
and consultancy costs and an appropriate portion of relevant
overheads. These costs are amortised over their estimated
useful lives of two to ten years. Costs associated with identifying,
sourcing, evaluating or maintaining computer software are
recognised as an expense as incurred.
h. Property, plant and equipment
(i) Cost
Property, plant and equipment held for use in the business
are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any
provisions for impairment.
(ii) Depreciation
Depreciation is provided to reflect a straight line reduction
from cost to estimated residual value over the estimated useful
life of the asset as follows:
Freehold land – not depreciated
Freehold and long leasehold buildings – over remaining useful life
Short leasehold land and buildings – over remaining period
of the lease
Fixtures and fittings – between 4 and 20 years
Computers and electronic equipment – between 3 and 5 years
Motor cars – 4 years
Commercial vehicles – between 3 and 10 years
Long leaseholds are defined as those having remaining lease
terms of more than 50 years. Asset lives and residual values are
reviewed at each balance sheet date.
(iii) Impairment
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment
is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference
to the net present value of expected future pre-tax cash flows
(‘value-in-use’) of the relevant cash generating unit or fair value
less costs to sell if higher. The discount rate applied is based
upon the Group’s weighted average cost of capital with
appropriate adjustments for the risks associated with the
relevant cash generating unit. Any impairment in value is
charged to the income statement in the period in which
it occurs.
(iv) Disposal
The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset
is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds
and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the
income statement. Sales of land and buildings are accounted
for when there is an unconditional exchange of contracts.
(v) Subsequent costs
Subsequent costs are included in the related asset’s carrying
amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only
when it is probable that future economic benefits associated
with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can
be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are
charged to the income statement in the period in which they
are incurred.
i. Leased assets
Where assets are financed by leasing agreements which give
rights approximating to ownership, the assets are treated as if
they had been purchased outright. The amount capitalised is
the lower of the fair value or the present value of the minimum
lease payments during the lease term at the inception of the
lease. The assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease
term or their useful life. Obligations relating to finance leases,
net of finance charges in respect of future periods, are included,
as appropriate, under borrowings due within or after one year.
The finance charge element of rentals is charged to finance
costs in the income statement over the lease term.
All other leases are operating leases and the rental payments
are generally charged to the income statement in the period
to which the payments relate, except for those leases which
incorporate fixed minimum rental uplift clauses. Leases which
contain fixed minimum rental uplifts are charged to the income
statement on a straight line basis over the lease term.
Where a lease is taken out for land and buildings combined,
the buildings element of the lease may be capitalised as a
finance lease if it meets the criteria for a finance lease, but the
land element will in most cases be classified as an operating
lease. If the contracted lease payments are not split between
land and buildings in the lease contract, the split is made based
on the market values of the land and buildings at the inception
of the lease.
Incentives received or paid to enter into lease agreements are
released to the income statement on a straight line basis over
the lease term.
69
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
j. Investment property
Investment property is property held by the Group to earn rental
income or for capital appreciation. The Group’s investment
properties are carried at cost less depreciation and provision for
impairment. Depreciation is provided on a consistent basis with
that applied to property, plant and equipment.
k. Capitalisation of borrowing costs
Interest on borrowings to finance the construction of properties
held as non-current assets is capitalised from the date work
starts on the property to the date when substantially all the
activities which are necessary to get the property ready for
use are complete. Where construction is completed in parts,
each part is considered separately when capitalising interest.
Interest is capitalised before any allowance for tax relief.
l. Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable
value, on a weighted average cost basis.
Trade discounts and rebates received are deducted in
determining the cost of purchase of inventories. Cost includes
appropriate attributable overheads and direct expenditure
incurred in the normal course of business in bringing goods
to their present location and condition. Costs of inventories
include the transfer from equity of any gains or losses on
qualifying cash flow hedges relating to purchases.
Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price in the
ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary
to make the sale. Write downs to net realisable value are made
for slow moving, damaged or obsolete items and other events
or conditions resulting in expected selling prices being lower
than cost. The carrying value of inventories reflects known and
expected losses of product in the ordinary course of business.
m. Employee benefits
(i) Post employment benefits
The Group operates various defined benefit and defined
contribution pension schemes for its employees, some of which
are required by local legislation. A defined benefit scheme is a
pension scheme which defines an amount of pension benefit
which an employee will receive on retirement. A defined
contribution scheme is a pension scheme under which the
Group usually pays fixed contributions into a separate entity.
In all cases other than some of the legally required schemes,
a separate fund is being accumulated to meet the accruing
liabilities. The assets of each of these funds are either held
under trusts or managed by insurance companies and are
entirely separate from the Group’s assets.
The asset or liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect
of defined benefit pension schemes is the fair value of scheme
assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at
the balance sheet date, together with an adjustment for any past
service costs not yet recognised. The defined benefit obligation
is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the
projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined
benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated
future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality
corporate bonds which are denominated in the currency in
which the benefits will be paid and which have terms to maturity
approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are credited or charged
to the statement of comprehensive income as they arise.
Past service costs are recognised immediately in the income
statement, unless the changes to the pension scheme are
conditional on the employees remaining in service for a
specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the
past service costs are amortised on a straight line basis over
the vesting period.
For defined contribution schemes, the Group pays contributions
to privately administered pension schemes on a contractual
basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the
contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognised
as an employee benefit expense when they are due.
(ii) Share-based compensation
The Group operates several equity-settled, share-based
compensation schemes. The fair value of the employee
services received in exchange for the grant of options or
deferred shares is recognised as an expense and is calculated
using Black-Scholes and stochastic models. The total amount
to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by
reference to the fair value of the options or deferred shares
granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting
conditions. The value of the charge is adjusted to reflect
expected and actual levels of options vesting due to
non-market vesting conditions.
n. Taxation
The income tax expense represents the sum of the tax
currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable
is based on taxable profit for the year.
Taxable profit differs from profit before taxation as reported
in the income statement because it excludes items of income
or expense which are taxable or deductible in other years or
which are never taxable or deductible.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable
on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding
tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit and is
accounted for using the balance sheet liability method.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable
temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognised to
the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available
against which deductible temporary differences or unused tax
losses can be utilised. Deferred tax liabilities are not recognised
if the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition
of goodwill in a business combination. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference
arises from the initial recognition (other than in a business
combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction
which affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting
profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable
temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates, except where the Group is able
to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is
probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in
the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at
each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is
no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available
to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Current and deferred tax are calculated using tax rates which
have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance
sheet date and are expected to apply in the period when the
liability is settled or the asset is realised.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
70
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
2 Principal accounting policies continued
Current and deferred tax are charged or credited to the income
statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited
directly to equity, in which case the current or deferred tax is
also recognised directly in equity.
Current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against
each other when they relate to income taxes levied by the same
tax jurisdiction and when the Group intends to settle its current
tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
o. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present legal
or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is more
likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to
settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are
determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a
pre-tax rate which reflects current market assessments of the
time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific
to the liability.
p. Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are
derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows
from the financial asset expire or the Group has substantially
transferred the risks and rewards of ownership. Financial
liabilities (or a part of a financial liability) are derecognised
when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged
or cancelled or expires.
(i) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits
held on call with banks and other short term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less.
(ii) Borrowings
Interest bearing borrowings are recorded at the proceeds
received, net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured
at amortised cost. Where borrowings are in designated and
effective fair value hedge relationships, adjustments are made
to their carrying amounts to reflect the hedged risks. Finance
charges, including premiums payable on settlement or
redemption and direct issue costs, are amortised to the
income statement using the effective interest method.
(iii) Other investments
Other investments include bank deposits, government bonds
and other short term investments with original maturities of
more than three months.
(iv) Trade receivables
Trade receivables are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost less any provision
for bad and doubtful debts.
(v) Trade payables
Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost.
(vi) Derivatives and hedge accounting
Where hedge accounting is not applied, or to the extent to
which it is not effective, changes in the fair value of derivatives
are recognised in the income statement as they arise. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives transacted as hedges of operating
items and financing items are recognised in operating profit
and net finance costs respectively.
Derivatives are initially recorded at fair value on the date a
derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently carried
at fair value. The accounting treatment of derivatives and other
financial instruments classified as hedges depends on their
designation, which occurs at the start of the hedge relationship.
The Group designates certain financial instruments as:
• a hedge of the fair value of an asset or liability or
unrecognised firm commitment (‘fair value hedge’);
• a hedge of a highly probable forecast transaction or firm
commitment (‘cash flow hedge’); or
• a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (‘net
investment hedge’).
Fair value hedges
For an effective hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value,
the hedged item is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable
to the risk being hedged with the corresponding entry being
recorded in the income statement. Gains or losses from
remeasuring the corresponding hedging instrument are
recognised in the same line of the income statement.
Cash flow hedges
Changes in the effective portion of the fair value of derivatives
that are designated as hedges of future cash flows are
recognised directly in equity, with any ineffective portion
being recognised immediately in the income statement
where relevant. If the cash flow hedge of a firm commitment or
forecast transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial
asset or liability, then, at the time it is recognised, the associated
gains or losses on the derivative that had previously been
recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement of
the non-financial asset or liability. For hedges that result in the
recognition of a financial asset or liability, amounts deferred in
equity are recognised in the income statement in the same
period in which the hedged item affects net profit or loss.
Net investment hedges
Where the Group hedges net investments in foreign operations
through foreign currency borrowings, the gains or losses on the
retranslation of the borrowings are recognised directly in equity.
If the Group uses derivatives as the hedging instrument, the
effective portion of the hedge is recognised in equity, with any
ineffective portion being recognised immediately in the income
statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are
recycled through the income statement on disposal of the
foreign operation.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the Group documents
in advance the relationship between the item being hedged
and the hedging instrument. The Group also documents and
demonstrates an assessment of the relationship between the
hedged item and the hedging instrument, which shows that the
hedge has been and will be highly effective on an ongoing basis.
The effectiveness testing is re-performed at each period end to
ensure that the hedge remains highly effective.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies
for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gain or loss
on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is retained in
equity until the highly probable forecast transaction occurs.
If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
net cumulative gain or loss recognised in equity is transferred
to the income statement.
71
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Principal accounting policies continued
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other
host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their
risks and characteristics are not closely related to those
of host contracts, and the host contracts are not carried at
fair value with unrealised gains or losses reported in the
income statement.
3 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements under
IFRS requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the application of policies and reported amounts.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are
based on historical experience and other factors including
expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. The estimates and assumptions which have a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year
are discussed below.
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
As required, the Group applies procedures to ensure that its
assets are carried at no more than their recoverable amount.
The procedures, by their nature, require estimates and
assumptions to be made. The most significant are set
out below.
The Group is required, on at least an annual basis, to test
whether goodwill has suffered any impairment. As part of this
testing the recoverable amounts of cash generating units have
been determined based on value-in-use calculations. The
use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows
expected to arise from the continuing operation of the cash
generating unit and the choice of suitable discount and long
term growth rates in order to calculate the present value of the
forecast cash flows. Actual outcomes could vary significantly
from these estimates. Further information on the impairment
tests undertaken, including the key assumptions, is given
in note 12.
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment
is conducted, the recoverable amount of an asset or a cash
generating unit is determined as the higher of fair value less
costs to sell and value-in-use, calculated on the basis of
management’s assumptions and estimates.
At each reporting date the Group is required to assess whether
there is objective evidence that its investments in associates and
joint ventures may be impaired. This requires estimates of the
investments’ recoverable amounts, including present values
of the Group’s share of future cash flows.
Inventories
As inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable
value this requires the estimation of the eventual sales price of
goods to customers in the future. A high degree of judgement
is applied when estimating the impact on the carrying value of
inventories of factors such as slow moving items, shrinkage,
damage and obsolescence. The quantity, age and condition
of inventories are regularly measured and assessed as part
of range reviews and inventory counts undertaken through
out the year and across the Group. Refer to note 18 for
further information.
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions
and there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of
business. Significant judgement may therefore be required in
determining the provision for income taxes in each territory. The
Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based
on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the
final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts
which were initially recorded, such differences will impact the
income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which
such determination is made. These adjustments in respect of
prior years are recorded in the income statement or directly
in equity as appropriate. Refer to notes 9 and 25 for
further information.
Restructuring provisions
The Group carries a number of provisions in relation to historical
and ongoing restructuring programmes. The most significant
part of the provisions is the cost to exit stores and property
contracts. The ultimate costs and timing of cash flows are
dependent on exiting the property lease contracts on the
closed stores and subletting surplus space. Refer to note
26 for further information.
Post employment benefits
The present value of the defined benefit liabilities recognised
on the balance sheet is dependent on a number of assumptions
including interest rates of high quality corporate bonds,
inflation and mortality rates. The net interest charge or return
is dependent on both the interest rates of high quality corporate
bonds and the assumed investment returns on scheme assets.
The assumptions are based on the conditions at the time
and changes in these assumptions can lead to significant
movements in the estimated obligations. To help the reader
understand the impact of changes in the key assumptions,
a sensitivity analysis is provided in note 27.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
72
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
4 Segmental analysis
Income statement
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Sales 4,316 4,194 1,029 1,034 10,573
Retail profit 234 397 107 43 781
Exceptional items (26)
Central costs (42)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (18)
Operating profit 695
Net finance costs (4)
Profit before taxation 691
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Sales 4,338 4,470 1,094 929 10,831
Retail profit 271 423 135 53 882
Exceptional items (12)
Central costs (43)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (20)
Operating profit 807
Net finance costs (10)
Profit before taxation 797
The current financial year is the 53 weeks ended 2 February 2013 with the comparative financial year being the 52 weeks ended
28 January 2012. This only impacts the UK & Ireland businesses with all of the other businesses reporting on a calendar basis as a
result of local requirements. The effect of the 53rd week on the results of the Group is the inclusion of an additional £72m sales and
an immaterial benefit to retail profit.
Balance sheet
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Segment assets 1,458 1,443 600 620 4,121
Central liabilities (402)
Goodwill 2,399
Net cash 38
Net assets 6,156
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Total
Segment assets 1,403 1,309 505 596 3,813
Central liabilities (395)
Goodwill 2,397
Net debt (88)
Net assets 5,727
73
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
4 Segmental analysis continued
Other segmental information
2012/13
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Central Total
Capital expenditure 125 93 49 43 6 316
Depreciation and amortisation 133 72 14 26 3 248
Impairment losses 8 – – – – 8
Non-current assets
(1)
3,332 1,984 584 459 20 6,379
2011/12
Other International
£ millions UK & Ireland France Poland Other Central Total
Capital expenditure 225 118 55 48 4 450
Depreciation and amortisation 122 77 12 25 1 237
Impairment losses 2 1 – 4 – 7
Non-current assets
(1)
3,344 1,923 524 438 13 6,242
(1) Non-current assets exclude investments in joint ventures and associates, post employment benefits, deferred tax assets, derivatives and other receivables.
The operating segments disclosed above are based on the information reported internally to the Board of Directors and
Group Executive. This information is predominantly based on the geographical areas in which the Group operates and
which are managed separately. The Group only has one business segment being the supply of home improvement products
and services.
The ‘Other International’ segment consists of Poland, China, Spain, Russia, the joint venture Koçta s¸ in Turkey and the
associate Hornbach which has operations in Germany and other European countries. Poland has been shown separately
due to its significance.
Central costs principally comprise the costs of the Group’s head office. Central liabilities comprise unallocated head office
and other central items including pensions, interest and tax.
5 Exceptional items
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Included within selling and distribution expenses
Ireland restructuring (21) –
UK restructuring 4 2
UK stores acquisition integration – (11)
(17) (9)
Included within administrative expenses
UK restructuring (20) –
Net pension gain 11 –
(9) –
Included within other income
Loss on disposal of properties – (3)
– (3)
Exceptional items before tax (26) (12)
Tax on exceptional items 1 7
Exceptional items (25) (5)
Following a sustained decline in trading, the Group undertook a detailed review in the year of its Irish operations and as a result
entered into an Examinership process in January 2013. The £21m restructuring charge represents provisions recorded for the
impairment of properties and estimated costs of exiting leases and other closure activities.
The UK restructuring net charge of £16m principally reflects the streamlining of B&Q UK & Ireland’s store support office and
kitchen, bathroom and bedroom business as well as IT services. It also includes a £4m release (2011/12: £2m) of an onerous
property contract provision for idle stores either sublet or exited in the period, which had previously been included as part of the
B&Q UK store closure and downsizing programme in 2005/06.
In the prior year the Group acquired 29 Focus stores in the UK and incurred £11m of costs integrating these into the B&Q
store network.
The net pension gain of £11m includes a £27m curtailment gain arising due to the closure of the UK final salary scheme to
future benefit accrual. Offsetting the gain is a charge of £16m for transitional payments to scheme members.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
74
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
6 Net finance costs
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Bank overdrafts and bank loans (8) (12)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (7) (10)
Finance leases (4) (5)
Financing fair value remeasurements 2 2
Unwinding of discount on provisions – (4)
Expected net interest charge on defined benefit pension schemes (3) –
Other interest payable – (3)
Capitalised interest 1 1
Finance costs (19) (31)
Cash and cash equivalents 15 19
Expected net interest return on defined benefit pension schemes – 2
Finance income 15 21
Net finance costs (4) (10)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt interest includes net interest income accrued on derivatives of £15m (2011/12:
£15m income) and amortisation of issue costs of borrowings of £1m (2011/12: £1m).
Capitalised interest relates to central borrowings and is calculated by applying a capitalisation rate of 1.6% (2011/12: 2.0%) to
expenditure on qualifying assets.
Financing fair value remeasurements comprise a net gain on derivatives, excluding accrued interest, of £10m (2011/12: £6m gain),
offset by a net loss from fair value adjustments to the carrying value of borrowings and cash of £8m (2011/12: £4m loss).
7 Profit before taxation
The following items of revenue have been credited in arriving at profit before taxation:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Sales 10,573 10,831
Other income 36 30
Finance income 15 21
Revenue 10,624 10,882
The following items of expense/(income) have been charged/(credited) in arriving at profit before taxation:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Operating lease rentals
Minimum lease payments – Property 435 411
Minimum lease payments – Equipment 35 37
Sublease income (17) (20)
453 428
Rental income received on investment property (6) (5)
Amortisation of other intangible assets
(1)
27 24
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and investment property
Owned assets 212 205
Under finance leases 9 8
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and investment property
(2)
8 7
Loss on disposal
Land and buildings and investment property – 3
Fixtures, fittings and equipment 4 3
Other intangible assets 1 1
Inventories: write down to net realisable value 16 14
Trade and other receivables: write down of bad and doubtful debts 4 4
(1) Of the amortisation of other intangible assets charge, £1m (2011/12: £3m) and £26m (2011/12: £21m) are included in selling and distribution expenses
and administrative expenses respectively.
(2) £7m of the 2012/13 charge relates to exceptional Ireland restructuring.
75
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
7 Profit before taxation continued
Auditors’ remuneration
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Fees payable for the audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements 0.3 0.2
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and their associates for other services to the Group:
The audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 1.3 1.2
Audit fees 1.6 1.4
Audit-related assurance services 0.1 0.1
Other taxation advisory services 0.1 0.1
Other assurance services 0.1 0.1
Other services 0.1 0.2
Non-audit fees 0.4 0.5
Auditors’ remuneration 2.0 1.9
Details of the Group’s policy on the use of auditors for non-audit services, the reasons why the auditor was used rather than another
supplier and how the auditor’s independence and objectivity was safeguarded are set out in the Audit Committee Report on page
41. No services were provided pursuant to contingent fee arrangements.
8 Employees and directors
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Wages and salaries 1,276 1,268
Social security costs 258 258
Post employment benefits
Defined contribution 17 8
Defined benefit (service cost only) 17 29
Share-based compensation 9 32
Employee benefit expenses 1,577 1,595
Number thousands 2012/13 2011/12
Stores 72 72
Administration 5 5
Average number of persons employed 77 77
The average number of persons employed excludes employees in the Group’s joint ventures and associates.
Remuneration of key management personnel
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Short term employee benefits 5.2 8.4
Post employment benefits 1.4 1.0
Share-based compensation 1.3 8.4
7.9 17.8
Key management consists of the Board of Directors and the Group Executive.
Further detail with respect to the Directors’ remuneration is set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59. Other
than as set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report, there have been no transactions with key management during the year
(2011/12: £nil).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
76
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
9 Income tax expense
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
UK corporation tax
Current tax on profits for the year 47 68
Adjustments in respect of prior years (13) (16)
34 52
Overseas tax
Current tax on profits for the year 128 142
Adjustments in respect of prior years (54) (31)
74 111
Deferred tax
Current year 18 12
Adjustments in respect of prior years 5 (12)
Adjustments in respect of changes in tax rates (4) (5)
19 (5)
Income tax expense 127 158
Factors affecting tax charge for the year
The tax charge for the year differs from the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 24% (2011/12: 26%). The differences are
explained below:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Profit before taxation 691 797
Profit multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 24% (2011/12: 26%) 166 207
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates (5) (8)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 6 12
Temporary differences:
– Net gains on property (3) (6)
– Losses not recognised 11 3
Foreign tax rate differences 18 14
Adjustments in respect of prior years (62) (59)
Adjustments in respect of changes in tax rates (4) (5)
Income tax expense 127 158
The effective rate of tax on profit before exceptional items and excluding prior year tax adjustments and the impact of changes
in tax rates on deferred tax is 27% (2011/12: 28%). Tax on exceptional items for the year is a credit of £1m. In 2011/12 tax on
exceptional items was a credit of £7m, £5m of which related to prior year items. The effective tax rate calculation is set out in the
Financial Review on page 20.
The overall tax rate for the year is 18% (2011/12: 20%) reflecting the impact on deferred tax of the 2% fall in the UK rate, release
of prior year provisions either reassessed or time expired and a claim for the use of prior year losses of £33 million.
In addition to the amounts charged to the income statement, tax of £14m has been charged directly to equity (2011/12: £9m
charge), of which a £6m credit (2011/12: £33m credit) is included in current tax and a £20m charge (2011/12: £42m charge) is
included in deferred tax.
Kingfisher paid €138m tax to the French tax authorities in the year ended 31 January 2004 as a consequence of the Kesa
Electricals demerger and recorded this as an exceptional tax charge. Kingfisher appealed successfully against this tax liability and
as a result received €169m from the French tax authorities in September 2009, representing a refund of the €138m and €31m of
repayment supplement. The French tax authorities appealed this decision and the hearing took place in May 2011 with the Court
of Appeal finding in Kingfisher’s favour. The French tax authorities have appealed this decision to the final level of court although
a date for this hearing has not yet been set. Therefore no income has yet been recognised relating to this receipt.
77
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
9 Income tax expense continued
Impact of changes in tax rates
The UK corporation tax rate fell from 26% to 24% from 1 April 2012 and will fall to 23% from 1 April 2013. A further reduction
to 21% was announced in 2012, which is expected to take effect from 1 April 2014, and a subsequent reduction to 20% was
announced in 2013, which is expected to take effect from 1 April 2015. Since these further reductions have not yet been
substantively enacted, their impact is not included in these financial statements. The combined effect would be to reduce
the net deferred tax liability as reported at 2 February 2013 by £9m.
10 Earnings per share
2012/13 2011/12
Earnings
£ millions
Weighted
average
number of
shares
millions
Earnings
per share
pence
Earnings
£ millions
Weighted
average
number of
shares
millions
Earnings
per share
pence
Basic earnings per share 564 2,339 24.1 640 2,331 27.5
Dilutive share options 34 (0.3) 44 (0.6)
Diluted earnings per share 564 2,373 23.8 640 2,375 26.9
Basic earnings per share 564 2,339 24.1 640 2,331 27.5
Exceptional items 26 1.1 12 0.5
Tax on exceptional and prior year items (67) (2.8) (66) (2.8)
Financing fair value remeasurements (2) (0.1) (2) (0.1)
Tax on financing fair value remeasurements 1 – – –
Adjusted basic earnings per share 522 2,339 22.3 584 2,331 25.1
Diluted earnings per share 564 2,373 23.8 640 2,375 26.9
Exceptional items 26 1.1 12 0.5
Tax on exceptional and prior year items (67) (2.8) (66) (2.7)
Financing fair value remeasurements (2) (0.1) (2) (0.1)
Tax on financing fair value remeasurements 1 – – –
Adjusted diluted earnings per share 522 2,373 22.0 584 2,375 24.6
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the Company by the
weighted average number of shares in issue during the year, excluding those held in the Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust
(‘ESOP’) which for the purpose of this calculation are treated as cancelled.
For diluted earnings per share, the weighted average number of shares is adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential
ordinary shares. These represent share options granted to employees where both the exercise price is less than the average market
price of the Company’s shares during the year and any related performance conditions have been met.
11 Dividends
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Dividends to equity shareholders of the Company
Final dividend for the year ended 28 January 2012 of 6.37p per share (29 January 2011: 5.145p per share) 148 121
Interim dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 of 3.09p per share (28 January 2012: 2.47p per share) 73 57
221 178
The proposed final dividend for the year ended 2 February 2013 of 6.37p per share is subject to approval by shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting and has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
78
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
12 Goodwill
£ millions
Cost
At 29 January 2012 2,521
Exchange differences 3
At 2 February 2013 2,524
Impairment
At 29 January 2012 (124)
Exchange differences (1)
At 2 February 2013 (125)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 2,399
Cost
At 30 January 2011 2,512
Additions 2
Exchange differences 7
At 28 January 2012 2,521
Impairment
At 30 January 2011 (117)
Exchange differences (7)
At 28 January 2012 (124)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 2,397
Impairment tests for goodwill
Goodwill has been allocated for impairment testing purposes to groups of cash generating units (‘CGUs’) as follows:
£ millions UK France Poland China Total
At 2 February 2013
Cost 1,798 520 81 125 2,524
Impairment – – – (125) (125)
Net carrying amount 1,798 520 81 – 2,399
At 28 January 2012
Cost 1,798 518 81 124 2,521
Impairment – – – (124) (124)
Net carrying amount 1,798 518 81 – 2,397
The recoverable amounts of these groups of CGUs have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. The groups of CGUs
for which the carrying amount of goodwill is deemed significant are the UK, France and Poland.
The Board have reviewed a sensitivity analysis, including the use of prior year discount and growth rates, and do not consider that
a reasonably possible change in the assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations would cause the carrying amounts of the
CGUs to exceed their recoverable amounts. The key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations are set out below.
Assumptions
• The cash flow projections are based on approved financial budgets and strategic plans covering a four year period. These are
based on both past performance and expectations for future market development.
• Key drivers in the plans are like-for-like (‘LFL’) sales, margin and operating profit percentage. LFL sales are based on the Group’s
market expectations and the CGUs’ market shares.
• Cash flows beyond this four year period are calculated using a growth rate which does not exceed the long term average growth
rate for retail businesses operating in the same countries as the CGUs.
• The weighted average cost of capital, used to discount future cash flows, is calculated using a combination of the cost of debt,
leases and equity, weighted according to an estimate of the CGU’s capital gearing. A risk adjustment is also made for the country
in which the CGU operates.
79
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
12 Goodwill continued
UK
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 8.9% (2011/12: 10.5%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the UK market.
• The long term growth rate is 2.8% (2011/12: 1.9%).
France
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 9.6% (2011/12: 13.3%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the French market.
• The long term growth rate is 2.3% (2011/12: 1.9%).
Poland
• The risk-adjusted discount rate of 10.5% (2011/12: 14.7%) is pre-tax and reflects the specific risks inherent in the Polish market.
• The long term growth rate is 3.5% (2011/12: 1.9%).
13 Other intangible assets
£ millions
Computer
software Other Total
Cost
At 29 January 2012 343 9 352
Additions 72 – 72
Disposals (3) – (3)
Exchange differences 2 – 2
At 2 February 2013 414 9 423
Amortisation
At 29 January 2012 (226) (3) (229)
Charge for the year (26) (1) (27)
Disposals 1 – 1
Exchange differences (2) – (2)
At 2 February 2013 (253) (4) (257)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 161 5 166
Cost
At 30 January 2011 293 13 306
Additions 61 – 61
Disposals (10) (4) (14)
Exchange differences (1) – (1)
At 28 January 2012 343 9 352
Amortisation
At 30 January 2011 (213) (7) (220)
Charge for the year (23) (1) (24)
Disposals 9 4 13
Exchange differences 1 1 2
At 28 January 2012 (226) (3) (229)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 117 6 123
None of the Group’s other intangible assets have indefinite useful lives.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
80
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
14 Property, plant and equipment
£ millions
Land and
buildings
Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment Total
Cost
At 29 January 2012 3,049 2,375 5,424
Additions 88 171 259
Disposals (19) (42) (61)
Transfers to investment property (12) – (12)
Exchange differences 74 36 110
At 2 February 2013 3,180 2,540 5,720
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (345) (1,412) (1,757)
Charge for the year (46) (174) (220)
Impairment losses (1) (7) (8)
Disposals 5 37 42
Exchange differences (9) (20) (29)
At 2 February 2013 (396) (1,576) (1,972)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 2,784 964 3,748
Cost
At 30 January 2011 2,989 2,246 5,235
Additions 167 206 373
Disposals (13) (50) (63)
Transfers to investment property (25) – (25)
Exchange differences (69) (27) (96)
At 28 January 2012 3,049 2,375 5,424
Depreciation
At 30 January 2011 (309) (1,294) (1,603)
Charge for the year (43) (169) (212)
Impairment losses (4) (3) (7)
Disposals 8 45 53
Exchange differences 3 9 12
At 28 January 2012 (345) (1,412) (1,757)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 2,704 963 3,667
Assets in the course of construction included above at net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 81 46 127
At 28 January 2012 49 64 113
Assets held under finance leases included above at net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 19 34 53
At 28 January 2012 20 29 49
The amount of borrowing costs capitalised in property, plant and equipment in the year has been £1m (2011/12: £1m).
The cumulative total of borrowing costs included at the balance sheet date, net of depreciation, is £27m (2011/12: £26m).
81
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
14 Property, plant and equipment continued
Land and buildings are analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Freehold
Long
leasehold
Short
leasehold Total Total
Cost 2,443 136 601 3,180 3,049
Depreciation (139) (6) (251) (396) (345)
Net carrying amount 2,304 130 350 2,784 2,704
Properties that were held at 1 February 2004 are carried at deemed cost, being the fair value of land and buildings as at the
transition date to IFRS. Fair value is taken to be the open market value at the date of valuation. All property acquired after
1 February 2004 is carried at cost.
Included in land and buildings is leasehold land that is in effect a prepayment for the use of land and is accordingly being
amortised on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The net carrying amount of leasehold land included
in land and buildings at 2 February 2013 is £240m (2011/12: £237m).
The Group does not revalue properties within its financial statements. A valuation exercise is performed for internal purposes
annually in November by independent external valuers covering over one third of the property portfolio with the remaining portfolio
valued internally. Based on this exercise the value of property is £3.5 billion (2011/12: £3.4bn). The key assumption used in
calculating this is the estimated yields.
15 Investment property
£ millions
Cost
At 29 January 2012 67
Additions 3
Transfers from property, plant and equipment 12
Exchange differences (3)
At 2 February 2013 79
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (12)
Charge for the year (1)
At 2 February 2013 (13)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 66
Cost
At 30 January 2011 44
Additions 9
Disposals (9)
Transfers from property, plant and equipment 25
Exchange differences (2)
At 28 January 2012 67
Depreciation
At 30 January 2011 (12)
Charge for the year (1)
Exchange differences 1
At 28 January 2012 (12)
Net carrying amount
At 28 January 2012 55
A property valuation exercise is performed for internal purposes annually as described in note 14. Based on this exercise the fair
value of investment property is £121m (2011/12: £90m).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
82
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
16 Subsidiaries
A list of the significant investments in subsidiaries, including the name, country of incorporation and proportion of ownership
interest is given in note 4 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
17 Investments in joint ventures and associates
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 271
Share of post-tax results 20
Dividends (10)
Exchange differences 8
At 2 February 2013 289
At 30 January 2011 259
Share of post-tax results 32
Dividends (10)
Exchange differences (10)
At 28 January 2012 271
No goodwill is included in the carrying amount of investments in joint ventures and associates (2011/12: £nil).
Details of the significant joint ventures and associates are shown below:
Country of
incorporation % interest held
Class of
shares owned Main activity
Principal joint ventures
Koçtas¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S.
(1)
Turkey 50% Ordinary Retailing
Principal associates
Hornbach Holding A.G.
(2)
Germany 21% Ordinary &
preference
Retailing
Crealfi S.A. France 49% Ordinary Finance
(1) Owing to local conditions, this company prepares its financial statements to 31 December.
(2) This company prepares its financial statements to 28 February (or 29 February in a leap year). In order to avoid undue delay in the presentation of the
Group financial statements, the Group records its share of post-tax results for the year ended 30 November. The value of the Group’s investment based on
published price quotations at 2 February 2013 was £195m (2011/12: £178m).
Aggregate amounts relating to joint ventures and associates:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions Joint ventures Associates Total Joint ventures Associates Total
Non-current assets 28 269 297 29 249 278
Current assets 56 303 359 59 296 355
Current liabilities (47) (211) (258) (54) (195) (249)
Non-current liabilities (8) (101) (109) (2) (111) (113)
Share of net assets 29 260 289 32 239 271
Sales 165 605 770 166 608 774
Operating expenses (156) (576) (732) (152) (570) (722)
Operating profit 9 29 38 14 38 52
Net finance costs (3) (7) (10) (2) (7) (9)
Profit before taxation 6 22 28 12 31 43
Income tax expense (1) (7) (8) (2) (9) (11)
Share of post-tax results 5 15 20 10 22 32
83
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
18 Inventories
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Finished goods for resale 2,083 1,844
The cost of inventories recognised as an expense and included in cost of sales for the year ended 2 February 2013 is £6,093m
(2011/12: £6,304m).
19 Trade and other receivables
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Non-current
Prepayments 13 13
Property receivables 2 2
Other receivables 3 2
18 17
Current
Trade receivables 50 61
Provision for bad and doubtful debts (11) (12)
Net trade receivables 39 49
Property receivables 3 3
Prepayments 135 141
Other receivables 368 338
545 531
Trade and other receivables 563 548
Other receivables principally comprise rebates due from suppliers.
The fair values of trade and other receivables approximate to their carrying amounts. Refer to note 24 for information on the credit
risk associated with trade and other receivables.
20 Cash and cash equivalents
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Cash at bank and in hand 268 271
Short term deposits 130 316
398 587
Short term deposits comprise bank deposits and investments in money market funds, fixed for periods of up to three months.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents approximate to their carrying amounts.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
84
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
21 Trade and other payables
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Current
Trade payables 1,370 1,256
Other taxation and social security 227 229
Deferred income 168 153
Accruals and other payables 665 718
2,430 2,356
Non-current
Accruals and other payables 115 121
Trade and other payables 2,545 2,477
Accruals include allowance for customer returns, representing the estimate of future sales returns at the year end.
The fair values of trade and other payables approximate to their carrying amounts.
22 Borrowings
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Current
Bank overdrafts – 102
Bank loans 54 82
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 32 172
Finance leases 13 11
99 367
Non-current
Bank loans 14 16
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 306
Finance leases 52 53
332 375
Borrowings 431 742
Bank overdrafts and loans
Bank overdrafts are repayable on demand and current bank loans mature within the next 12 months. Bank overdrafts are arranged
at floating rates of interest. Current bank loans include Chinese Renminbi loans drawn under committed facilities expiring in 2013.
These loans bear interest based on the People’s Bank of China reference rate and are fixed for periods of up to six months. At the
year end the effective borrowing rate on the drawn amounts was 6.2% (2011/12: 6.2%). Other current bank loans are arranged at
floating rates of interest.
Non-current bank loans have an average maturity of three years (2011/12: three years) and are arranged at fixed rates of interest
with an effective interest rate of 3.8% (2011/12: 3.6%).
85
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
22 Borrowings continued
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt
Medium Term Notes (‘MTNs’) were issued in prior years under the Group’s €2,500m MTN programme and further notes issued as
a US Private Placement (‘USPP’).
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Principal
outstanding Maturity date Coupon
Effective
interest rate
Carrying
amount
Carrying
amount
Euro MTN €nil 23/11/12
(1)
4.13% 4.3% – 172
US Dollar USPP $50m 24/05/13
(2)
6.14% 6.1% 32 34
Sterling MTN £73m 15/12/14
(3)
5.63% 5.8% 78 80
US Dollar USPP $68m 24/05/16
(2)
6.30% 6.3% 49 51
US Dollar USPP $179m 24/05/18
(2)
6.40% 6.4% 139 141
298 478
(1) Swapped to floating rate Euro based on 3 month EURIBOR plus a margin using an interest rate swap. Repaid on 23/11/2012 upon maturity.
(2) $297m swapped to floating rate Sterling based on 6 month LIBOR plus a margin using a cross-currency interest rate swap.
(3) Swapped to floating rate Euro based on 3 month EURIBOR plus a margin using a cross-currency interest rate swap.
The Group values its MTNs and USPP on an amortised cost basis, adjusted for fair value gains and losses (based on observable
market inputs) attributable to the risk being hedged in designated and effective fair value hedge relationships.
The carrying amounts of the MTNs and USPP have been impacted both by exchange rate movements and fair value adjustments
for interest rate risk. At 2 February 2013, the cumulative effect of interest rate fair value adjustments is to increase the Group’s
MTNs and USPP carrying amounts by £38m (2011/12: £49m increase).
The USPP contains a covenant requiring that, as at the end of each semi-annual and annual financial reporting period, the ratio of
operating profit to net interest payable, excluding exceptional items, should not be less than 3 to 1 for the preceding 12 month
period. The Group has complied with this covenant for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Finance leases
The Group leases certain of its buildings and fixtures and equipment under finance leases. The average lease term maturity for
buildings is seven years (2011/12: seven years) and for fixtures and equipment is two years (2011/12: two years). Certain building
leases include a clause to enable upward revision of the rental charge to prevailing market conditions.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases, together with the present value of minimum lease payments, are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Present value
of payments
Minimum
payments
Present value
of payments
Minimum
payments
Less than one year 13 15 11 14
One to five years 30 42 29 39
More than five years 22 31 24 35
Total 65 88 64 88
Less amounts representing finance charges (23) (24)
Present value of minimum lease payments 65 64
The interest rates inherent in the finance leases are fixed at the contract date for the lease term. The weighted average effective
interest rate on the Group’s finance leases is 8.5% (2011/12: 8.4%).
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
86
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
22 Borrowings continued
Fair value of borrowings
The fair values of current borrowings approximate to their carrying amounts.
Where available, market values have been used to determine the fair values of non-current borrowings. Where market values are
not available or are not reliable, fair values have been calculated by discounting cash flows at prevailing interest and foreign
exchange rates. The carrying amounts and fair values of non-current borrowings are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Carrying
amount Fair value
Carrying
amount Fair value
Bank loans 14 12 16 16
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 274 306 314
Finance leases 52 82 53 84
332 368 375 414
Assets worth RMB 1.6bn (£163m) secure a bank facility in China, which matures in July 2013 (2011/12: RMB 1.6bn).
23 Derivatives
The net fair value of derivatives by hedge designation at the balance sheet date is:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Fair value hedges 69 64
Cash flow hedges (14) 9
Net investment hedges (18) –
Non-designated hedges 22 5
59 78
Non-current assets 55 66
Current assets 33 26
Current liabilities (17) (6)
Non-current liabilities (12) (8)
59 78
The fair values are calculated by discounting future cash flows arising from the instruments and adjusting for credit risk. These fair
value measurements are all made using observable market rates of interest, foreign exchange and credit risk and are therefore
classified as ‘level 2’ in the IFRS 7, ‘Financial instruments: Disclosures’, fair value hierarchy. At 2 February 2013 net derivative
assets included in net debt amount to £71m (2011/12: £67m net derivative assets).
Fair value hedges
Fair value hedges comprise interest rate swap contracts that convert fixed rate debt issued under the Group’s Medium Term Note
programme and the US Private Placement to floating rate liabilities, along with certain cross-currency swaps. At 2 February 2013
the Sterling equivalent amount of such contracts is £261m (2011/12: £516m). During the year, interest rate swaps have expired to
coincide with the final repayment of underlying debt. The Sterling equivalent amount of those expired swaps (at year end exchange
rates) was £174m.
Cash flow hedges
Forward foreign exchange contracts hedge currency exposures of forecast inventory purchases. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling
equivalent amount of such contracts is £441m (2011/12: £376m). The associated fair value gains and losses will be transferred to
inventories when the purchases occur during the next 12 months. Gains of £8m (2011/12: £8m losses) have been transferred to
inventories for contracts which matured during the year.
Net investment hedges
Cross-currency interest rate swaps hedge currency exposures of overseas investments. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling equivalent
amount of such contracts is £90m (2011/12: £nil).
Non-designated hedges
The Group has entered into certain derivatives to provide a hedge against fluctuations in the income statement arising from balance
sheet positions. At 2 February 2013 the Sterling equivalent amount of such contracts is £1,062m (2011/12: £715m). These have
not been accounted for as hedges, since the fair value movements of the derivatives in the income statement offset the retranslation
of the balance sheet positions. These include short term foreign exchange contracts.
The Group has reviewed all significant contracts for embedded derivatives and none of these contracts has any embedded
derivatives which are not closely related to the host contract and therefore the Group is not required to account for these separately.
87
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
24 Financial risk management
Kingfisher’s treasury function has primary responsibility for managing certain financial risks to which the Group is exposed. The
Board reviews the levels of exposure regularly and approves treasury policies covering the use of financial instruments required
to manage these risks. Kingfisher’s treasury function is not run as a profit centre and does not enter into any transactions for
speculative purposes.
In the normal course of business the Group uses financial instruments including derivatives. The main types of financial
instruments used are Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt, bank loans and deposits, money market funds, interest
rate swaps, commodity swaps and foreign exchange contracts.
Interest rate risk
Borrowings arranged at floating rates of interest expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk, whereas those arranged at fixed
rates of interest expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The Group manages its interest rate risk by entering into certain
interest rate derivative contracts which modify the interest rate payable on the Group’s underlying debt instruments, principally
the Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt.
Currency risk
The Group’s principal currency exposures are to the Euro, US Dollar, Polish Zloty and Chinese Renminbi. The Euro, Polish Zloty
and Chinese Renminbi exposures are operational and arise through the ownership of retail businesses in France, Spain, Ireland,
Poland and China. In particular, the Group generates a substantial part of its profit from the Eurozone, and as such is exposed
to the economic uncertainty of its member states. The Group continues to monitor potential exposures and risks, and develop
effective risk management solutions.
Balance sheet Euro translation exposure is currently hedged by maintaining a proportion of the Group’s debt in Euro, whilst
Chinese Renminbi balance sheet translation exposure is partly hedged by local debt in China. It is the Group’s policy not to
hedge the translation of overseas earnings into Sterling. In addition, the Group has significant transactional exposure arising on
the purchase of inventories denominated in US Dollars, which it hedges using forward foreign exchange contracts. Under Group
policies, the Group companies are required to hedge committed inventory purchases and a proportion of forecast inventory
purchases arising in the next 12 months, and this is monitored on an ongoing basis.
Kingfisher’s policy is to manage the interest rate and currency profile of its issued debt using derivative contracts. The effect of these
contracts on the Group’s net debt/cash is as follows:
Sterling Euro US Dollar Other
£ millions Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Fixed Floating Total
At 2 February 2013
Net cash before fair value
adjustments and financing derivatives (114) 91 (39) 135 (188) 3 103 14 5
Fair value adjustments to net cash (6) – – – (32) – – – (38)
Financing derivatives 78 (1,064) – 192 222 315 – 328 71
Net cash (42) (973) (39) 327 2 318 103 342 38
At 28 January 2012
Net debt before fair value
adjustments and financing derivatives (134) 7 (183) 290 (189) 2 90 11 (106)
Fair value adjustments to net debt (8) – (3) – (38) – – – (49)
Financing derivatives 81 (892) 171 (97) 293 262 – 249 67
Net debt (61) (885) (15) 193 66 264 90 260 (88)
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
88
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
24 Financial risk management continued
Financial instruments principally affected by interest rate and currency risks, being the significant market risks impacting Kingfisher,
are borrowings, deposits and derivatives. The following analysis illustrates the sensitivity of net finance costs (reflecting the impact
on profit) and derivative cash flow hedges (reflecting the impact on other comprehensive income) to changes in interest rates and
foreign exchange rates.
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Net finance
costs
Income/
(costs)
Net finance
costs
Income/
(costs)
Effect of 1% rise in interest rates on net finance costs
Sterling (10) (9)
Euro 3 2
US Dollar 3 3
Polish Zloty 3 2
Chinese Renminbi – –
Due to the Group’s hedging arrangements and offsetting foreign currency assets and liabilities, there is no significant impact on
profit from the retranslation of financial instruments.
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Derivative
cash flow
hedges
Increase/
(decrease)
Derivative
cash flow
hedges
Increase/
(decrease)
Effect of 10% appreciation in foreign exchange rates on derivative cash flow hedges
US Dollar against Sterling 18 17
US Dollar against Euro 21 15
The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash flow hedges results from retranslation of forward purchases of US Dollars
used to hedge forecast US Dollar purchases of inventories. The associated fair value gains and losses are deferred in equity until
the purchases occur. See note 23 for further details. The retranslation of foreign currency borrowings and derivatives designated as
hedges of net investments in foreign operations is reported in equity and offset by the retranslation of the hedged net investments.
The sensitivity analysis excludes the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying amount of trade and other payables
and receivables, due to the low associated sensitivity, and are before the effect of tax. It has been prepared on the basis that the
Group’s debt, hedging activities, hedge accounting designations, and foreign currency proportion of debt and derivative contracts
remain constant, reflecting the positions at 2 February 2013 and 28 January 2012 respectively. As a consequence, the analysis
relates to the position at those dates and is not necessarily representative of the years then ended. In preparing the sensitivity
analysis it is assumed that all hedges are fully effective.
The effects shown above would be reversed in the event of an equal and opposite change in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
89
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
24 Financial risk management continued
Liquidity risk
The Group regularly reviews the level of cash and debt facilities required to fund its activities. This involves preparing a prudent cash
flow forecast for the next three years, determining the level of debt facilities required to fund the business, planning for repayments
of debt at its maturity and identifying an appropriate amount of headroom to provide a reserve against unexpected outflows.
The following table analyses the Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities and derivative assets and liabilities into relevant maturity
groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. It excludes trade and other
payables due to the low associated liquidity risk. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows
(including interest) and as such may differ from the amounts disclosed on the balance sheet.
£ millions
Less than
1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years
More than
5 years Total
At 2 February 2013
Bank loans (55) (4) (2) (4) (5) – (70)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (47) (87) (10) (52) (7) (117) (320)
Finance leases (15) (16) (12) (8) (6) (31) (88)
Derivatives – receipts 47 87 10 52 7 117 320
Derivatives – payments (30) (93) (2) (39) (2) (98) (264)
At 28 January 2012
Bank overdrafts (102) – – – – – (102)
Bank loans (85) (6) (4) (2) (4) – (101)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (191) (47) (87) (10) (52) (125) (512)
Finance leases (14) (13) (11) (9) (6) (35) (88)
Derivatives – receipts 23 47 87 10 52 125 344
Derivatives – payments (7) (31) (90) (3) (39) (101) (271)
At 2 February 2013 the Group has an undrawn revolving facility of £200m which matures in August 2016. The £200m facility
contains a covenant requiring that, as at the end of each annual and semi-annual financial reporting period, the ratio of operating
profit to net interest payable, excluding exceptional items, should not be less than 3 to 1 for the preceding 12 month period. The
Group has complied with this covenant for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Credit risk
The Group deposits surplus cash with a number of banks with the strongest short term credit ratings and with money market funds
which have AAA credit ratings and offer same day liquidity. A credit limit for each counterparty is agreed by the Board covering the
full value of deposits and a proportion of the fair value of derivative contracts. The credit risk is reduced further by spreading the
investments and derivative contracts across several counterparties. At 2 February 2013, the highest cash deposit with a single
counterparty was £32m (2011/12: £63m).
The Group’s exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of cash at bank and short term deposits and the fair
value of derivative assets.
No further credit risk provision is required in excess of the normal provision for bad and doubtful debts as the Group has a low
concentration of credit risk in respect of trade receivables. Concentration of risk is limited as a result of low individual balances with
short maturity spread across a large number of unrelated customers.
At 2 February 2013, trade and other receivables that are past due but not provided against amount to £41m (2011/12: £62m),
of which £3m (2011/12: £3m) are over 120 days past due.
Refer also to note 35 for details on guarantees provided by the Group.
Capital risk
Capital risk management disclosures are provided in the Financial review on page 24.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
90
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
25 Deferred tax
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Deferred tax assets 17 23
Deferred tax liabilities (303) (269)
(286) (246)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against each other when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax jurisdiction
and when the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
£ millions
Accelerated
tax
depreciation
Gains on
property Provisions Tax losses
Post
employment
benefits Other Total
At 29 January 2012 (115) (144) 33 7 (30) 3 (246)
(Charge)/credit to income statement (17) 14 (15) 1 (2) – (19)
(Charge)/credit to equity – – – – (27) 7 (20)
Exchange differences (4) (2) 2 – 2 1 (1)
At 2 February 2013 (136) (132) 20 8 (57) 11 (286)
At 30 January 2011 (98) (161) 27 2 11 8 (211)
(Charge)/credit to income statement (22) 16 8 6 (4) 1 5
Charge to equity – – – – (36) (6) (42)
Exchange differences 5 1 (2) (1) (1) – 2
At 28 January 2012 (115) (144) 33 7 (30) 3 (246)
At the balance sheet date, the Group has unused tax losses of £243m (2011/12: £246m) available for offset against future profits.
A deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of £24m (2011/12: £23m) of such losses. No deferred tax asset has been
recognised in respect of the remaining £219m (2011/12: £223m) due to the unpredictability of future profit streams. Included in
unrecognised tax losses are tax losses arising in China of £187m (2011/12: £210m) which can be carried forward only in the next
one to five years. Other unrecognised losses may be carried forward indefinitely.
No deferred tax liability is recognised on temporary differences of £2,980m (2011/12: £114m) relating to the unremitted earnings of
overseas subsidiaries and joint ventures. This is because the earnings are continually reinvested by the Group and therefore no tax
is expected to be payable on them in the foreseeable future. The total temporary difference has increased significantly in the period
largely as a result of changes introduced by the French government to apply a surtax on gross dividend distributions paid by French
entities. Previously only 5% of dividend income received in France was potentially subject to tax at the prevailing corporate income
tax rate. Hence as a result of the surtax the total earnings on which the tax would be chargeable, should they be remitted from or
through France, has increased considerably.
26 Provisions
£ millions
Onerous
property
contracts Restructuring Total
At 29 January 2012 21 38 59
Charge to income statement 2 50 52
Credit to income statement – (4) (4)
Utilised in the year (2) (32) (34)
At 2 February 2013 21 52 73
Current liabilities 4 31 35
Non-current liabilities 17 21 38
21 52 73
Within the onerous property contracts provisions, Kingfisher has provided against future liabilities for all properties sublet at a
shortfall and long term idle properties, except those related to restructuring programmes which are included in the restructuring
provisions. The provisions are based on the present value of future cash outflows relating to rent, rates and service charges.
Restructuring provisions include the estimated costs of the UK, Ireland and China restructuring programmes. The provisions have
been discounted to reflect the time value of money and the risks associated with the specific liabilities.
The ultimate costs and timing of cash flows related to the above provisions are largely dependent on exiting the property lease
contracts and subletting surplus space.
91
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
27 Post employment benefits
The Group operates a variety of post employment benefit arrangements covering both funded and unfunded defined benefit
schemes and funded defined contribution schemes. The most significant are the funded, final salary defined benefit and defined
contribution schemes for the Group’s UK employees. Various defined benefit and defined contribution schemes are operated in
France and Poland, where they are principally retirement indemnity in nature, and in China. The overseas schemes are not material
in relation to the Group as a whole.
Defined contribution schemes
Pension costs for defined contribution schemes, at rates specified in the individual schemes’ rules, are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Charge to operating profit 17 8
From July 2012 an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered to all UK employees. Eligible UK employees will be
automatically enrolled into the defined contribution scheme from 31 March 2013.
Defined benefit schemes
The Group’s principal defined benefit pension scheme is in the UK. The assets of this scheme are held separately from the Group
in trustee-administered funds. The Trustees are required to act in the best interests of the scheme’s beneficiaries.
A full actuarial valuation of the scheme is carried out every three years by an independent actuary for the scheme Trustee and the
last full valuation was carried out as at 31 March 2010. The Company monitors the scheme funding level on a regular basis and will
review with the scheme Trustee at future valuations the continued appropriateness of the repayment schedule currently in place.
During the year, and following consultation with the active members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed to future
benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012. The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. The closure to future accrual
resulted in an exceptional non-cash curtailment gain of £27m, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities as benefits
are no longer linked to future salary increases other than in line with inflation.
UK scheme interest in property partnership
In 2010/11, the Group established a partnership, Kingfisher Scottish Limited Partnership (‘Kingfisher SLP’), as part of an
arrangement with the UK scheme Trustee to address an element of the scheme deficit and provide greater security to the Trustee.
The partnership interests are held by the Group and by the scheme, the latter resulting from investments of £78m and £106m
made by the Trustee in January and June 2011 respectively. These investments followed Group contributions of the same amounts
into the scheme. Under IAS 19, ‘Employee benefits’, the investments held by the scheme in Kingfisher SLP do not represent plan
assets for the purposes of the Group’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly the reported pension position does not reflect
these investments. The Group has control over the partnership and therefore it is consolidated in these Group financial statements.
Accordingly, advantage has been taken of the exemptions provided by Regulation 7 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations
2008 from the requirements for preparation, delivery and publication of the partnership’s accounts.
UK property assets with market values of £83m and £119m were transferred, in January 2011 and June 2011 respectively, into
the partnership and leased back to B&Q plc. The Group retains control over these properties, including the flexibility to substitute
alternative properties. The Trustee has a first charge over the properties in the event that Kingfisher plc becomes insolvent. The
scheme’s partnership interest entitles it to the majority of the income of the partnership over the 20 year period of the arrangement.
The payments to the scheme by Kingfisher SLP over this term are reflected as Group pension contributions on a cash basis. At the
end of this term, Kingfisher plc has the option to acquire the Trustee’s partnership interest in Kingfisher SLP.
Income statement
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Amounts charged/(credited) to operating profit
Current service cost 13 4 17 24 5 29
Exceptional curtailment gain (27) – (27) – – –
(14) 4 (10) 24 5 29
Amounts charged/(credited) to net finance costs
Interest on defined benefit obligations 84 3 87 90 3 93
Expected return on pension scheme assets (83) (1) (84) (94) (1) (95)
1 2 3 (4) 2 (2)
Total (credited)/charged to income statement (13) 6 (7) 20 7 27
Of the net credit to operating profit, a £12m charge (2011/12: £22m charge) and £22m credit (2011/12: £7m charge) are included
in selling and distribution expenses and administrative expenses respectively. Actuarial gains and losses have been reported in the
statement of comprehensive income.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
92
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
27 Post employment benefits continued
Balance sheet
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Present value of defined benefit obligations (1,994) (93) (2,087) (1,902) (60) (1,962)
Fair value of scheme assets 2,065 22 2,087 1,927 20 1,947
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme 71 (71) – 25 (40) (15)
The amount of the defined benefit obligation at 2 February 2013 which relates to funded defined benefit schemes is £2,087m
(2011/12: £1,962m).
Movements in the surplus or deficit are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme at beginning of year 25 (40) (15) (21) (37) (58)
Current service cost (13) (4) (17) (24) (5) (29)
Exceptional curtailment gain 27 – 27 – – –
Interest on defined benefit obligations (84) (3) (87) (90) (3) (93)
Expected return on pension scheme assets 83 1 84 94 1 95
Actuarial (losses)/gains (7) (22) (29) 18 2 20
Contributions paid by employer 40 1 41 48 1 49
Exchange differences – (4) (4) – 1 1
Surplus/(deficit) in scheme at end of year 71 (71) – 25 (40) (15)
Movements in the present value of defined benefit obligations are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Present value of defined benefit obligations at beginning of year (1,902) (60) (1,962) (1,646) (57) (1,703)
Current service cost (13) (4) (17) (24) (5) (29)
Exceptional curtailment gain 27 – 27 – – –
Interest on defined benefit obligations (84) (3) (87) (90) (3) (93)
Actuarial (losses)/gains (80) (22) (102) (197) 2 (195)
Contributions paid by employees (5) – (5) (7) – (7)
Benefits paid 63 1 64 62 1 63
Exchange differences – (5) (5) – 2 2
Present value of defined benefit obligations at end of year (1,994) (93) (2,087) (1,902) (60) (1,962)
Movements in the fair value of scheme assets are as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Fair value of scheme assets at beginning of year 1,927 20 1,947 1,625 20 1,645
Expected return on pension scheme assets 83 1 84 94 1 95
Actuarial gains on pension scheme assets 73 – 73 215 – 215
Contributions paid by employer 40 1 41 48 1 49
Contributions paid by employees 5 – 5 7 – 7
Benefits paid (63) (1) (64) (62) (1) (63)
Exchange differences – 1 1 – (1) (1)
Fair value of scheme assets at end of year 2,065 22 2,087 1,927 20 1,947
The fair value of scheme assets is analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total % of total UK Other Total % of total
Equities 552 – 552 26% 486 – 486 25%
Bonds 1,367 – 1,367 66% 1,298 – 1,298 67%
Property 70 – 70 3% 87 – 87 4%
Other 76 22 98 5% 56 20 76 4%
Total fair value of scheme assets 2,065 22 2,087 100% 1,927 20 1,947 100%
93
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
27 Post employment benefits continued
The actual return on pension scheme assets is as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions UK Other Total UK Other Total
Actual return on pension scheme assets 156 1 157 309 1 310
The estimated amount of total contributions to be paid to the UK and overseas pension schemes by the Group during the next
financial year is £32m.
Amounts for the current and previous four years
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09
Present value of defined benefit obligations (2,087) (1,962) (1,703) (1,716) (1,437)
Fair value of scheme assets 2,087 1,947 1,645 1,518 1,363
Deficit in scheme – (15) (58) (198) (74)
Changes in assumptions underlying present value of defined benefit
obligations (98) (195) 40 (226) 21
Percentage of defined benefit obligations 5% 10% (2%) 13% (1%)
Experience (losses)/gains arising on defined benefit obligations (4) – 34 – (1)
Percentage of defined benefit obligations – – (2%) – –
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets 73 215 54 61 (211)
Percentage of scheme assets 3% 11% 3% 4% (15%)
Total (losses)/gains recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in
the year (29) 20 128 (165) (191)
Cumulative losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income (220) (191)
Principal actuarial valuation assumptions
The assumptions used in calculating the costs and obligations of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes are set by the
Directors after consultation with independent professionally qualified actuaries. The assumptions are based on the conditions at
the time and changes in these assumptions can lead to significant movements in the estimated obligations, as illustrated in the
sensitivity analysis.
The UK scheme discount rate is based on the yield on the iBoxx over 15 year AA-rated Sterling corporate bond index adjusted for
the difference in term between iBoxx and scheme liabilities. The overall expected rate of return on scheme assets reflects market
expectations at the valuation date of long term asset returns and the mix of assets in the schemes.
2012/13 2011/12
Annual % rate UK Other UK Other
Discount rate 4.6 2.8 4.5 4.6
Salary escalation n/a 2.0 to 6.7 3.8 2.0 to 6.7
Rate of pension increases 3.3 – 3.0 –
Price inflation 3.3 2.0 3.0 2.0
2012/13 2011/12
% rate of return UK Other UK Other
Equities 7.6 – 7.6 –
Bonds 3.5 – 3.4 –
Property 5.9 – 5.8 –
Other 2.4 3.5 2.6 3.5
Overall expected rate of return 4.6 3.5 4.5 3.5
For the UK scheme, the mortality assumptions used in the actuarial valuations have been selected with regard to the characteristics
and experience of the membership of the scheme from 2007 to 2010. The base mortality assumptions have been derived by
adjusting standard mortality tables (SAPS tables) projected forward to 2010 with the medium cohort improvement factors for
males and with the standard improvement factors for females. In addition, allowance has been made for future increases in life
expectancy. For males, the allowance is in line with medium cohort improvements subject to a minimum rate of improvement of
1% pa, and for females, the allowance is in line with the average of the standard series and long cohort improvements, subject to a
minimum of 1% pa. These improvements take into account trends observed within the scheme over the past decade and general
population trends.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
94
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
27 Post employment benefits continued
The assumptions for life expectancy of UK scheme members are as follows:
Years 2012/13 2011/12
Age to which current pensioners are expected to live (60 now)
– Male 86.4 86.4
– Female 87.1 87.1
Age to which future pensioners are expected to live (60 in 15 years’ time)
– Male 87.1 87.1
– Female 88.7 88.7
The following sensitivity analysis for the UK scheme shows the estimated impact on obligations resulting from changes to key
actuarial assumptions, whilst holding all other assumptions constant.
Assumption Change in assumption Impact on defined benefit obligation
Discount rate Increase/decrease by 0.1% Decrease/increase by £38m
Rate of pension increases Increase/decrease by 0.1% Increase/decrease by £25m
Price inflation Increase/decrease by 0.1% Increase/decrease by £38m
Mortality Increase in life expectancy by one year Increase by £62m
28 Share capital
Number of
ordinary
shares
millions
Ordinary
share capital
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 2,369 372
New shares issued under share schemes 3 1
At 2 February 2013 2,372 373
At 30 January 2011 2,364 371
New shares issued under share schemes 5 1
At 28 January 2012 2,369 372
29 Other reserves
£ millions
Cash flow
hedge reserve
Translation
reserve Other Total
At 29 January 2012 7 247 159 413
Currency translation differences
Group – 122 – 122
Joint ventures and associates – 8 – 8
Cash flow hedges
Fair value losses (14) – – (14)
Gains transferred to inventories (8) – – (8)
Tax on other comprehensive income 7 (3) – 4
Other comprehensive income for the year (15) 127 – 112
At 2 February 2013 (8) 374 159 525
At 30 January 2011 (5) 385 159 539
Currency translation differences
Group – (129) – (129)
Joint ventures and associates – (10) – (10)
Cash flow hedges
Fair value gains 10 – – 10
Losses transferred to inventories 8 – – 8
Tax on other comprehensive income (6) 1 – (5)
Other comprehensive income for the year 12 (138) – (126)
At 28 January 2012 7 247 159 413
The ‘other’ category of reserve represents the premium on the issue of convertible loan stock in 1993 and the merger reserve
relating to the acquisition of Darty in 1993.
95
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
30 Share-based payments
2012/13 2011/12
Options
Number
Weighted
average exercise
price
£
Options
Number
Weighted
average exercise
price
£
Outstanding at beginning of year 89,247,441 0.33 77,771,222 0.42
Granted during the year
(1),(2)
12,292,718 0.50 29,570,764 0.28
Forfeited during the year (12,013,719) 0.31 (6,352,907) 0.83
Exercised during the year (27,359,417) 0.27 (11,741,638) 0.56
Outstanding at end of year 62,167,023 0.39 89,247,441 0.33
Exercisable at end of year 6,253,122 0.29 3,639,445 1.60
(1) The charge to the income statement for the years ended 2 February 2013 and 28 January 2012 in respect of share-based payments includes the first
year’s charge of the 2013 and 2012 Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme (‘KISS’) grants respectively, based on the bonus for the year. Since grants under
the KISS are made following the year end to which the first year of charge relates, it is not possible to give the number of options granted until after the
year end.
(2) The weighted average exercise price for options granted during the year represents a blend of nil price KISS, Performance Share Plan and Store
Management Incentive Share Scheme options and discounted Sharesave options (see below).
Information on the share schemes is given in note 13 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
Options have been exercised on a regular basis throughout the year. On that basis, the weighted average share price during the
year, rather than at the date of exercise, is £2.81 (2011/12: £2.55). The options outstanding at the end of the year have exercise
prices ranging from £nil to £2.38 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.1 years (2011/12: 3.6 years).
The Group recognised a total expense of £9m in the year ended 2 February 2013 (2011/12: £32m) relating to equity-settled
share-based payment transactions.
Under IFRS 2, ‘Share-based payment’, the Group recognises a charge for share options granted after 7 November 2002. Option
numbers and other disclosures above are for those options granted after this date. A full list of outstanding options is given in note
13 of the Company’s separate financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
96
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
30 Share-based payments continued
The fair value of share options and deferred shares is determined by independent valuers using Black-Scholes and stochastic
option pricing models. The inputs of the principal schemes into these models are as follows:
Date of
grant
Share price
at grant
£
Exercise
price
£
Expected
life
(2)
years
Expected
volatility
(3)
%
Dividend
yield
%
Risk free
rate
%
Fair
value
(4)
£
Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme
(1)
21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – – – 1.63
06/04/10 2.24 – 7.0 – – – 2.24
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 – – – 2.33
12/04/11 2.60 – 7.0 – – – 2.60
06/05/11 2.80 – 7.0 – – – 2.80
25/04/12 2.96 – 7.0 – – – 2.96
Performance Share Plan 01/02/08 1.51 – 7.0 28.2% – – 0.92
01/02/08 1.51 – 7.0 – – – 1.51
21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
24/07/08 1.24 – 7.0 – – – 1.24
01/10/08 1.35 – 7.0 35.9% – – 0.79
01/10/08 1.35 – 7.0 – – – 1.35
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 44.9% – 2.2% 1.17
21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – – – 1.63
30/10/09 2.24 – 7.0 – – – 2.24
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 – – – 2.33
05/05/10 2.33 – 7.0 46.7% – 1.5% 1.30
21/10/10 2.47 – 7.0 – – – 2.47
12/04/11 2.60 – 7.0 – – – 2.60
17/06/11 2.65 – 7.0 – – – 2.65
21/10/11 2.63 – 7.0 – – – 2.63
03/05/12 2.91 – 7.0 – – – 2.91
16/10/12 2.81 – 7.0 – – – 2.81
Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme 21/04/08 1.28 – 7.0 – – – 1.28
Store Management Incentive Share 21/04/09 1.63 – 7.0 – 3.3% – 1.48
Scheme 30/10/09 2.24 – 2.5 – 2.4% – 2.11
UK and International Sharesave 26/10/06 2.65 1.97 5.5 28.1% 4.0% 4.0% 0.38
01/11/07 1.90 1.55 5.5 25.5% 5.6% 5.0% 0.20
29/10/08 1.09 1.09 3.5 36.3% 4.9% 3.4% 0.14
29/10/08 1.09 1.09 5.5 30.8% 4.9% 3.8% 0.10
03/11/09 2.24 1.72 3.5 43.6% 2.4% 2.2% 0.51
03/11/09 2.24 1.72 5.5 36.4% 2.4% 2.9% 0.38
28/10/10 2.39 1.87 3.5 44.3% 2.3% 1.1% 0.53
28/10/10 2.39 1.87 5.5 37.3% 2.3% 1.9% 0.39
26/10/11 2.64 1.99 3.5 39.1% 2.9% 0.9% 0.54
26/10/11 2.64 1.99 5.5 37.6% 2.9% 1.4% 0.42
19/10/12 2.85 2.17 3.5 25.9% 3.3% 0.4% 0.45
19/10/12 2.85 2.17 5.5 37.6% 3.3% 0.9% 0.49
Executive Share Option Scheme 17/04/03 2.44 2.38 10.0 35.0% 4.0% 4.2% 0.64
(1) The Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme includes the Company Share Option Plan (‘CSOP’) element of the KISS awards. Details of the CSOP element
of the award are set out in the Director’s Remuneration Report.
(2) Expected life is disclosed based on the UK schemes. For the KISS and PSP schemes in the UK, the expiry date is 7 years from the date of grant.
Expiry of overseas KISS schemes and CSOP is 6 months from the date of vesting. Expiry of overseas PSP schemes is 1 year from the date of vesting.
(3) Expected volatility was determined for each individual award, by calculating the historical volatility of the Group’s share price (plus reinvested dividends)
immediately prior to the grant of the award, over the same period as the vesting period of each award, adjusted by expectations of future volatility.
(4) The fair values of UK and International Sharesave awards granted on or before 1 January 2009 have been restated to reflect the 17 January 2008
amendment to IFRS 2 on vesting conditions and cancellations.
97
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
31 Cash generated by operations
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Operating profit 695 807
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates (20) (32)
Depreciation and amortisation 248 237
Impairment losses 8 7
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, investment property and intangible assets 5 7
Share-based compensation charge 9 32
Increase in inventories (191) (94)
Increase in trade and other receivables (6) (28)
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables 19 (65)
Movement in provisions 14 (24)
Movement in post employment benefits (51) (20)
Cash generated by operations 730 827
32 Net cash
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Cash and cash equivalents 398 587
Bank overdrafts – (102)
Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts 398 485
Bank loans (68) (98)
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt (298) (478)
Financing derivatives 71 67
Finance leases (65) (64)
Net cash/(debt) 38 (88)
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Net (debt)/cash at beginning of year (88) 14
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts (106) (118)
Repayment of bank loans 31 10
Repayment of Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 162 30
Payment on financing derivatives – 5
Capital element of finance lease rental payments 12 16
Cash flow movement in net debt 99 (57)
Exchange differences and other non-cash movements 27 (45)
Net cash/(debt) at end of year 38 (88)
33 Acquisitions
In the prior year the Group acquired non-controlling interests in three of its B&Q China subsidiaries for a cash consideration of £8m.
In addition the Group acquired National Energy Services Limited in the UK for £2m.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
98
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
34 Commitments
Operating lease commitments
The Group leases various retail stores, offices, warehouses and plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating lease
agreements. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. Lease arrangements under which rental
payments are contingent upon sales, other performance or usage are not significant for the Group.
Undiscounted total future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Less than one year 461 434
One to five years 1,589 1,555
More than five years 2,637 2,867
4,687 4,856
The total of future minimum operating sublease receipts expected to be received is £203m (2011/12: £240m).
Capital commitments
Capital commitments contracted but not provided for by the Group amount to £36m (2011/12: £139m).
35 Contingent liabilities
The Group has arranged for certain guarantees to be provided to third parties in the ordinary course of business. Of these
guarantees, only £1m (2011/12: £10m) would crystallise due to possible future events not wholly within the Group’s control.
The Group is subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and provision is made where liabilities are
considered likely to arise on the basis of current information and legal advice.
36 Related party transactions
During the year, the Company and its subsidiaries carried out a number of transactions with related parties in the normal course of
business and on an arm’s length basis. The names of the related parties, the nature of these transactions and their total value are
shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Transactions with Koçta s¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. in which the Group
holds a 50% interest
Provision of employee services (0.2) (0.1) – –
Commission and other income 0.8 0.4 0.9 1.0
Transactions with Hornbach Holding A.G. in which the Group holds a 21% interest
Commission and other income 0.9 0.1 3.8 0.3
Other expenses – – (0.3) –
Transactions with Crealfi S.A. in which the Group holds a 49% interest
Provision of employee services 0.1 – 0.1 –
Commission and other income 4.3 0.3 7.0 1.5
Transactions with Kingfisher Pension Scheme
Provision of administrative services 1.4 0.1 1.1 –
Services are usually negotiated with related parties on a cost-plus basis. Goods are sold or bought on the basis of the price lists in
force with non-related parties.
The remuneration of key management personnel is given in note 8.
Other transactions with the Kingfisher Pension Scheme are detailed in note 27.
99
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Independent auditors’ report to the members of Kingfisher plc
We have audited the Group financial statements of Kingfisher
plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 which comprise the
Consolidated income statement, the Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, the Consolidated statement of changes
in equity, the Consolidated balance sheet, the Consolidated
cash flow statement and the related notes 1 to 36. The financial
reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation
is applicable law and International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the Company’s members,
as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken
so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters
we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for
no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do
not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our
audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities
statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation
of the Group financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit
and express an opinion on the Group financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and International Standards
on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to
comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards
for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or
error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the Group’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed;
the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made
by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the financial
statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-
financial information in the annual report to identify material
inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we
become aware of any apparent material misstatements or
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the Group financial statements:
• give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s affairs as
at 2 February 2013 and of its profit for the year then ended;
• have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRS as
adopted by the European Union; and
• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies
Act 2006
In our opinion:
• the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited
has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006; and
• the information given in the Directors’ report for the financial
year for which the Group financial statements are prepared is
consistent with the Group financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to
you if, in our opinion:
• certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit.
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
• the Directors’ statement, contained within the Directors’
responsibilities statement in relation to going concern;
• the part of the Corporate governance statement relating to
the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the
UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review; and
• certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board
on directors’ remuneration.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the Parent Company financial
statements of Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013.
Panos Kakoullis
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
100
ACCOUNTS
Company balance sheet
At 2 February 2013
£ millions Notes 2012/13 2011/12
Fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets 3 – –
Investments 4 6,978 6,941
6,978 6,941
Current assets
Debtors due within one year 5 3,414 3,088
Debtors due after more than one year 5 62 75
Cash at bank and in hand 124 278
3,600 3,441
Current liabilities
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 6 (5,669) (5,318)
Net current liabilities (2,069) (1,877)
Total assets less current liabilities 4,909 5,064
Non-current liabilities
Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 7 (278) (315)
Provisions for liabilities 8 (7) (6)
(285) (321)
Net assets excluding net pension asset 4,624 4,743
Net pension asset 9 – 6
Net assets 4,624 4,749
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital 10 373 372
Share premium account 11 2,204 2,199
Other reserves 11 711 711
Profit and loss account 11 1,336 1,467
Equity shareholders’ funds 12 4,624 4,749
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2013 and signed on its behalf by:
Ian Cheshire Karen Witts
Group Chief Executive Group Finance Director
101
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements
1 Principal accounting policies
The financial statements of Kingfisher plc (‘the Company’)
are made up to the nearest Saturday to 31 January each year.
The directors of Kingfisher plc, having made appropriate
enquiries, consider that adequate resources exist for the
Company to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future and that, therefore, it is appropriate to
adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial
statements for the year ended 2 February 2013. Refer to
the Directors’ statement of responsibility on page 33.
The financial statements have been prepared under the
historical cost convention, as modified by the use of valuations
for certain financial instruments, share-based payments and
pensions, and are prepared in accordance with applicable
accounting standards in the United Kingdom and the
Companies Act 2006.
The Company’s financial statements are included in the
consolidated financial statements of Kingfisher plc. As
permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the profit
and loss account and statement of total recognised gains and
losses are not presented. The Company has taken advantage
of the exemption from preparing a cash flow statement under
the terms of FRS 1, ‘Cash flow statements’. The Company is
exempt under the terms of FRS 8, ‘Related party disclosures’,
from disclosing related party transactions with wholly
owned subsidiaries of Kingfisher plc. The Company has
taken advantage of the exemption to provide financial
instrument disclosures under the terms of FRS 29,
‘Financial instruments: Disclosures’.
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation
of these financial statements are set out below. These policies
have been consistently applied to the years presented, unless
otherwise stated.
a. Foreign currencies
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Sterling at the rates of exchange
at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences on monetary
items are taken to the profit and loss account.
Principal rate of exchange against Sterling:
Euro 2012/13 2011/12
Year end rate 1.15 1.19
b. Tangible fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets are carried in the balance sheet at
cost less accumulated depreciation and any provisions for
impairment. Depreciation is provided to reflect a straight line
reduction from cost to estimated residual value over the
estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
Fixtures and fittings – between 4 and 20 years
Computers and electronic equipment – between 3 and 5 years
Motor cars – 4 years
Tangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable. When a review for impairment is
conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference
to the higher of value-in-use and net realisable value. Any
impairment in value is charged to the profit and loss account
in the period in which it occurs.
c. Investments
Investments in subsidiaries and associates are included in the
balance sheet at cost, less any provisions for impairment.
d. Operating leases
Rentals under operating leases are charged to the profit
and loss account in the period to which the payments relate.
Incentives received or paid to enter into lease agreements are
released to the profit and loss account on a straight line basis
over the lease term or, if shorter, the period to the date on
which the rent is first expected to be adjusted to the prevailing
market rate.
e. Employee benefits
(i) Pensions
The Company operates defined benefit and defined contribution
pension schemes for its employees. A defined benefit scheme
is a pension scheme that defines an amount of pension
benefit that an employee will receive on retirement. A defined
contribution scheme is a pension scheme under which the
Company usually pays fixed contributions into a separate entity.
In all cases a separate fund is being accumulated to meet the
accruing liabilities. The assets of each of these funds are either
held under trusts or managed by insurance companies and
are held entirely separate from the Company’s assets.
The asset or liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect
of defined benefit pension schemes is the fair value of scheme
assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at
the balance sheet date, together with an adjustment for any past
service costs not yet recognised. The defined benefit obligation
is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the
projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined
benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated
future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality
corporate bonds which are denominated in the currency in
which the benefits will be paid and which have terms to maturity
approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
A net pension asset is only recognised to the extent that it is
recoverable either through reduced future contributions or
through agreed refunds from the scheme.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited
directly to the profit and loss reserve as they arise.
Past service costs are recognised immediately in the profit
and loss account, unless the changes to the pension scheme
are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a
specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the
past service costs are amortised on a straight line basis over
the vesting period.
For defined contribution schemes, the Company pays
contributions to privately administered pension schemes on
a contractual basis. The Company has no further payment
obligations once the contributions have been paid. The
contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense
when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an
asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future
payments is available.
(ii) Share-based compensation
The Group operates several equity-settled, share-based
compensation schemes for the employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries using the Company’s equity instruments.
The fair value of the Company’s employees’ services received
in exchange for the grant of options or deferred shares is
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
102
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
1 Principal accounting policies continued
recognised as an expense and is calculated using Black-
Scholes and stochastic models. The total amount to be
expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference
to the fair value of the options or deferred shares granted,
excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. The
value of the charge is adjusted to reflect expected and actual
levels of options vesting due to non-market vesting conditions.
The fair value of the compensation given to subsidiaries in
respect of share-based compensation schemes is recognised
as a capital contribution over the vesting period. The capital
contribution is reduced by any payments received from
subsidiaries in respect of these schemes.
(iii) Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (‘ESOP’)
The ESOP is a separately administered discretionary trust.
Liabilities of the ESOP are guaranteed by the Company and the
assets of the ESOP mainly comprise shares in the Company.
Own shares held by the ESOP are deducted from equity
shareholders’ funds and the shares are held at historical cost
until they are sold. The assets, liabilities, income and costs
of the ESOP are included in both the Company’s and the
consolidated financial statements.
f. Deferred tax
Provision is made for deferred tax using the incremental
provision approach and is measured on an undiscounted
basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods
in which timing differences reverse, based on tax rates and
laws substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of timing differences
that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet
date subject to the following:
deferred tax is not recognised on the revaluation of non-
monetary assets such as property unless a binding sale
agreement exists at the balance sheet date. Where rollover
relief is available on an asset, deferred tax is not recognised;
deferred tax is recognised on unremitted earnings of overseas
subsidiaries and associates only where dividends are accrued
as receivable or there is an intention to remit these in the
foreseeable future;
deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that they are
regarded as recoverable. Assets are regarded as recoverable
when it is regarded as more likely than not that there will be
suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the
underlying timing differences can be deducted; and
deferred tax is not recognised on permanent differences.
g. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present
legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it
is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be
required to settle the obligation and the amount can be
reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognised for future
operating losses.
h. Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
Company’s balance sheet when the Company becomes a party
to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets
are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows
from the financial asset expire or the Company has substantially
transferred the risks and rewards of ownership. Financial
liabilities (or a part of a financial liability) are derecognised
when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged
or cancelled or expires.
(i) Borrowings
Interest bearing borrowings are recorded at the proceeds
received, net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured
at amortised cost. Where borrowings are in designated and
effective fair value hedge relationships, adjustments are made
to their carrying amounts to reflect the hedged risks. Finance
charges, including premiums payable on settlement or
redemption and direct issue costs, are amortised to the
profit and loss account using the effective interest method.
(ii) Trade creditors
Trade creditors are initially recognised at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost.
(iii) Derivatives and hedge accounting
Where hedge accounting is not applied, or to the extent to
which it is not effective, changes in the fair value of derivatives
are recognised in the profit and loss account as they arise.
Derivatives are initially recorded at fair value on the date a
derivative contract is entered into and subsequently carried at
fair value. The accounting treatment of derivatives classified as
hedges depends on their designation, which occurs at the start
of the hedge relationship. The Company designates certain
derivatives as a hedge of the fair value of an asset or liability
(‘fair value hedge’).
For an effective hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value,
the hedged item is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable
to the risk being hedged with the corresponding entry being
recorded in the profit and loss account. Gains or losses from
remeasuring the corresponding hedging instrument are also
recognised in the profit and loss account.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the Company
documents in advance the relationship between the item
being hedged and the hedging instrument. The Company
also documents and demonstrates an assessment of the
relationship between the hedged item and the hedging
instrument, which shows that the hedge has been and will be
highly effective on an ongoing basis. The effectiveness testing
is re-performed at each period end to ensure that the hedge
remains highly effective.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies
for hedge accounting.
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other
host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their
risks and characteristics are not closely related to those of
host contracts, and the host contracts are not carried at fair
value with unrealised gains or losses reported in the profit
and loss account.
103
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
2 Profit and loss account disclosures
The audit fee for the Company and the consolidated financial statements is disclosed in note 7 of the Kingfisher plc consolidated
financial statements. Fees payable to Deloitte LLP and their associates for audit and non-audit services to the Company are not
required to be disclosed because the Group financial statements disclose such fees on a consolidated basis. Details of the
Company’s policy on the use of auditors for non-audit services, the reasons why the auditor was used rather than another supplier
and how the auditor’s independence and objectivity was safeguarded are set out in the Audit Committee Report on page 41.
Dividend disclosures are provided in note 11 of the Kingfisher plc consolidated financial statements.
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Wages and salaries 21 24
Social security costs 3 5
Pensions
Defined contribution 2 1
Defined benefit (service cost only) 1 1
Share-based compensation 7 9
Employee benefit expenses 34 40
Number 2012/13 2011/12
Average number of persons employed
Administration 172 170
Directors’ remuneration and details of share option exercises are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59.
Total Directors’ remuneration for the year is £4.6m (2011/12: £4.4m).
3 Tangible fixed assets
£ millions
Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
Cost
At 29 January 2012 4
At 2 February 2013 4
Depreciation
At 29 January 2012 (4)
At 2 February 2013 (4)
Net carrying amount
At 2 February 2013 –
At 28 January 2012 –
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
104
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
4 Investments
£ millions
Investments
in Group
undertakings
At 29 January 2012 6,941
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments 71
Contributions received relating to share-based payments (34)
At 2 February 2013 6,978
The Directors consider that to give the full particulars of all subsidiary undertakings would lead to a statement of excessive length.
In accordance with Section 410(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2006, the information below relates to those Group undertakings at the
financial year end whose results or financial position, in the opinion of the Directors, principally affect the figures of the consolidated
financial statements of Kingfisher plc. Details of all subsidiary undertakings will be annexed to the next Annual Return of Kingfisher
plc to be filed at Companies House.
Country of incorporation
and operation
% interest held and
voting rights Class of share owned Main activity
B&Q plc Great Britain 100% Ordinary & special
(1)
Retailing
B&Q Properties Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Property investment
Halcyon Finance Ltd
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary Finance
Kingfisher Information Technology Services (UK) Limited
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary IT services
Screwfix Direct Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Retailing
Sheldon Holdings Limited
(2)
Great Britain 100% Ordinary Holding company
Zeus Land Investments Limited Great Britain 100% Ordinary Holding company
B&Q Ireland Limited Ireland 100% Ordinary Retailing
Brico Dépôt S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Retailing
Castorama Dubois Investissements S.C.A.
(3),(4)
France 100% Ordinary Holding company
Castorama France S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Retailing
Eurodépôt Immobilier S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Property investment
Immobilière Castorama S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Property investment
Kingfisher France S.A.S.
(3)
France 100% Ordinary Holding company
B&Q Asia Holdings Ltd
(5)
Hong Kong 100% Ordinary Holding company
Kingfisher Asia Limited Hong Kong 100% Ordinary Sourcing
B&Q (China) B.V.
(5)
Netherlands 100% Ordinary Holding company
Castim Sp.z.o.o.
(3)
Poland 100% Ordinary Property investment
Castorama Polska Sp.z.o.o.
(3)
Poland 100% Ordinary Retailing
Castorama RUS LLC
(6)
Russia 100% Ordinary Retailing
Euro Dépôt España S.A.U.
(3)
Spain 100% Ordinary Retailing
(1) The special shares in B&Q plc are owned 100% by Kingfisher plc and are non-voting.
(2) Held directly by Kingfisher plc.
(3) Owing to local conditions, these companies prepare their financial statements to 31 January.
(4) Castorama Dubois Investissements S.C.A. is 100% owned, of which 45% is held directly by Kingfisher plc.
(5) Holding companies for the Group’s Chinese retailing operations, which have a 31 December year end.
(6) Owing to local conditions, this company prepares its financial statements to 31 December.
105
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
5 Debtors
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Amounts falling due within one year
Owed by Group undertakings 3,314 3,014
Corporation tax 71 64
Derivatives 28 8
Other debtors 1 2
3,414 3,088
Amounts falling due after more than one year
Derivatives 55 65
Deferred tax assets 7 10
62 75
6 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 32 172
Derivatives 1 1
Owed to Group undertakings 5,600 5,097
Accruals and other payables 36 48
5,669 5,318
7 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Borrowings
Medium Term Notes and other fixed term debt 266 306
266 306
Derivatives 12 9
278 315
Borrowings fall due for repayment as follows:
One to two years 78 34
Two to five years 49 131
More than five years 139 141
266 306
8 Provisions for liabilities
£ millions
Onerous
property
contracts
At 29 January 2012 6
Charge to income statement 1
At 2 February 2013 7
Within the onerous property contracts provision, the Company has provided against future liabilities for all properties sublet at a
shortfall and long term idle properties. The provision is based on the present value of future cash outflows relating to rent, rates and
service charges.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
106
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
9 Net pension asset
The Company participates in both a funded defined benefit scheme and a funded defined contribution scheme.
Defined contribution scheme
Pension costs for the defined contribution scheme, at rates specified in the scheme’s rules, are as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Charge to operating profit 2 1
From July 2012 an enhanced defined contribution scheme has been offered to all Company employees. Eligible Company
employees will be automatically enrolled into the defined contribution scheme from 31 March 2013.
Defined benefit scheme
Kingfisher plc is one of a number of Group companies that participate in the Kingfisher Pension Scheme, and therefore the
Company has accounted for its share of the scheme assets and liabilities. The valuation of the scheme has been based on the
most recent actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2010 and has been updated to 2 February 2013.
During the year, and following consultation with the active members, the UK final salary pension scheme was closed to future
benefit accrual with effect from 30 June 2012. The scheme had been closed to new entrants in 2004. The closure to future accrual
resulted in an exceptional non-cash curtailment gain of £1m, representing the one-off reduction in accounting liabilities as benefits
are no longer linked to future salary increases other than in line with inflation. Furthermore, it resulted in a full provision against
the net surplus being recognised at the curtailment date. This exceptional non-cash asset restriction loss of £6m reflects the
requirements under UK accounting standards, which restrict the amount of surplus that can be recognised following the closure
to future accrual of benefits.
In the prior year the Company entered into the second phase of an arrangement with the scheme Trustee to address an element of
the scheme deficit. Further details on this arrangement are given in note 27 of the consolidated financial statements. As part of this
arrangement, the Company made a contribution of £106m to the scheme and subsequently recharged the other participating
Group entities based on their share of pensionable payroll, resulting in a net cash contribution of £3m.
Profit and loss account
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Amounts charged/(credited) to operating profit
Current service cost 1 1
Curtailment gain (1) –
Asset restriction loss 6 –
6 1
Amounts charged/(credited) to net finance costs
Interest on defined benefit obligation 3 3
Expected return on pension scheme assets (3) (3)
– –
Total charged to profit and loss account 6 1
Balance sheet
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Present value of defined benefit obligation (59) (55)
Fair value of scheme assets 67 62
Net pension asset before provision for asset restriction and deferred tax 8 7
Provision for asset restriction (8) –
Net pension asset before deferred tax – 7
Related deferred tax liability – (1)
Net pension asset – 6
Movements in the net pension asset before deferred tax are as follows:
£ millions
Defined
benefit
obligation
Scheme
assets Total
Provision for
asset
restriction Net
At 29 January 2012 (55) 62 7 – 7
Current service cost (1) – (1) – (1)
Curtailment gain 1 – 1 – 1
Asset restriction loss – – – (6) (6)
Interest on defined benefit obligation (3) – (3) – (3)
Expected return on pension scheme assets – 3 3 – 3
Actuarial (losses)/gains (3) 3 – (2) (2)
Contributions paid by employer – 1 1 – 1
Benefits paid 2 (2) – – –
At 2 February 2013 (59) 67 8 (8) –
107
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
9 Net pension asset continued
£ millions
Defined
benefit
obligation
Scheme
assets Total
At 30 January 2011 (45) 47 2
Current service cost (1) – (1)
Interest on defined benefit obligation (3) – (3)
Expected return on pension scheme assets – 3 3
Actuarial (losses)/gains (8) 9 1
Contributions paid by employer – 5 5
Benefits paid 2 (2) –
At 28 January 2012 (55) 62 7
The fair value of scheme assets is analysed as follows:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions % of total £ millions % of total
Equities 16 24% 14 23%
Bonds 40 60% 38 61%
Property 2 3% 3 5%
Other 9 13% 7 11%
Total fair value of scheme assets 67 100% 62 100%
The actual return on pension scheme assets is as follows:
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Actual return on pension scheme assets 6 12
The estimated amount of contributions expected to be paid to the pension scheme by the Company during the next financial
year is £1m.
Amounts for current and previous four years
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09
Present value of defined benefit obligation (59) (55) (45) (49) (41)
Fair value of scheme assets 67 62 47 44 40
Net pension asset/(liability) before provision for asset restriction and deferred tax 8 7 2 (5) (1)
Provision for asset restriction (8) – – – –
Net pension asset/(liability) before deferred tax – 7 2 (5) (1)
Changes in assumptions underlying present value of defined benefit obligation (3) (8) 2 (6) 1
Percentage of defined benefit obligation 5% 15% (4%) 12% (2%)
Experience gains arising on defined benefit obligations – – 2 – –
Percentage of defined benefit obligation – – (4%) – –
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets 3 9 – 1 (7)
Percentage of scheme assets 4% 15% – 2% (18%)
Provision for asset restriction (2) – – – –
Total (losses)/gains recognised in the profit and loss reserve in the year (2) 1 4 (5) (6)
Cumulative losses recognised in the profit and loss reserve (15) (13)
Principal actuarial valuation assumptions
The assumptions used in calculating the costs and obligation of the defined benefit pension scheme are set by the Directors after
consultation with independent professionally qualified actuaries. The assumptions are based on the conditions at the time and
changes in these assumptions can lead to significant movements in the estimated obligation.
The discount rate is based on the yield on the iBoxx over 15 year AA-rated Sterling corporate bond index adjusted for the difference
in term between iBoxx and scheme liabilities. The overall expected rate of return on scheme assets reflects market expectations at
the valuation date of long term asset returns and the mix of assets in the scheme.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
108
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
9 Net pension asset continued
Annual % rate 2012/13 2011/12
Discount rate 4.6 4.5
Salary escalation n/a 3.8
Rate of pension increases 3.3 3.0
Price inflation 3.3 3.0
% rate of return 2012/13 2011/12
Equities 7.6 7.6
Bonds 3.5 3.4
Property 5.9 5.8
Other 4.7 4.9
Overall expected rate of return 4.7 4.6
The mortality assumptions used in the actuarial valuations have been selected with regard to the characteristics and experience of
the membership of the scheme from 2007 to 2010. The base mortality assumptions have been derived by adjusting standard
mortality tables (SAPS tables) projected forward to 2010 with the medium cohort improvement factors for males and with the
standard improvement factors for females. In addition, allowance has been made for future increases in life expectancy. For males,
the allowance is in line with medium cohort improvements subject to a minimum rate of improvement of 1% pa, and for females,
the allowance is in line with the average of the standard series and long cohort improvements, subject to a minimum of 1% pa.
These improvements take into account trends observed within the scheme over the past decade and general population trends.
The assumptions for life expectancy of the scheme members are as follows:
Years 2012/13 2011/12
Age to which current pensioners are expected to live (60 now)
– Male 86.4 86.4
– Female 87.1 87.1
Age to which future pensioners are expected to live (60 in 15 years’ time)
– Male 87.1 87.1
– Female 88.7 88.7
10 Called up share capital
Number of
ordinary
shares
millions
Ordinary
share capital
£ millions
At 29 January 2012 2,369 372
New shares issued under share schemes 3 1
At 2 February 2013 2,372 373
At 30 January 2011 2,364 371
New shares issued under share schemes 5 1
At 28 January 2012 2,369 372
109
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
11 Reserves
£ millions
Share
premium
account
Other
reserves
Profit and loss
account Total
At 29 January 2012 2,199 711 1,467 4,377
Profit for the year – – 8 8
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension scheme – – (2) (2)
Share-based compensation – – 7 7
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments – – 71 71
New shares issued under share schemes 5 – – 5
Own shares issued under share schemes – – 6 6
Dividends – – (221) (221)
At 2 February 2013 2,204 711 1,336 4,251
The other reserves represent the premium on the issue of convertible loan stock in 1993 and the merger reserve relating to the
acquisition of Darty.
The value of own shares deducted from the profit and loss reserve at 2 February 2013 is £60m (2011/12: £134m).
12 Reconciliation of movement in equity shareholders’ funds
£ millions 2012/13 2011/12
Profit for the year 8 510
Dividends (221) (178)
(213) 332
Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension scheme (2) 1
Share-based compensation 7 9
Capital contributions given relating to share-based payments 71 –
New shares issued under share schemes 6 6
Own shares issued under share schemes 6 11
Own shares purchased – (117)
Net (decrease)/increase in equity shareholders' funds (125) 242
Equity shareholders' funds at beginning of year 4,749 4,507
Equity shareholders' funds at end of year 4,624 4,749
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
110
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
13 Share options
Options to subscribe under the various schemes for ordinary shares of 15
5/7
p, including those held by the executive Directors
disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 45 to 59, are shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
Date of grant
Exercisable
from
Exercise price
£
Options
Number
Options
Number
Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme 21/04/09 21/04/12 – 207,009 2,620,537
06/04/10 06/04/13 – 2,198,684 2,472,705
05/05/10 05/05/13 – 5,126,662 5,841,849
12/04/11 12/04/14 – 3,763,341 4,237,554
06/05/11 06/05/14 – 646,141 722,680
25/04/12 25/04/15 – 4,388,519 –
16,330,356 15,895,325
Restricted Awards 20/11/08 01/04/12 – – 20,000
01/04/09 01/04/12 – – 70,000
06/04/10 21/04/11 – 42,190 42,190
06/04/10 21/04/12 – 65,835 65,835
06/04/10 21/04/13 – 19,762 19,762
30/04/10 21/04/12 – – 12,065
24/08/10 24/08/13 – 23,095 23,095
18/01/11 09/06/13 – 6,815 6,815
21/02/11 01/06/12 – 12,533 12,533
21/02/11 01/06/13 – 21,268 21,268
21/02/11 01/06/14 – 4,557 4,557
21/02/11 01/06/15 – 1,709 1,709
26/04/11 21/04/12 – 25,569 49,308
03/01/12 31/05/12 – – 17,308
03/01/12 21/05/13 – 6,344 6,344
03/01/12 31/05/14 – 10,300 10,300
16/10/12 16/01/14 – 5,975 –
245,952 383,089
Performance Share Plan 01/02/08 01/02/12 – 1,299,709 1,257,267
21/04/08 21/04/12 – 867,504 8,870,842
24/07/08 24/07/12 – – 1,460,627
01/10/08 01/10/11 – 745,856 721,402
01/10/08 01/02/12 – 745,856 721,402
01/10/08 01/10/12 – 303,212 1,382,616
21/04/09 21/04/12 – 412,486 3,900,823
30/10/09 21/04/12 – 2,509 623,860
30/10/09 21/04/13 – – 289,681
05/05/10 05/05/13 – 8,240,710 9,143,902
21/10/10 21/04/12 – 28,586 52,258
21/10/10 05/05/13 – 72,128 69,776
12/04/11 05/05/13 – 164,945 160,208
17/06/11 17/06/14 – 8,264,108 9,075,581
17/06/11 17/06/15 – 8,242,011 9,075,677
21/10/11 05/05/13 – 22,095 59,297
21/10/11 17/06/14 – 142,346 159,021
21/10/11 17/06/15 – 142,351 159,021
03/05/12 17/06/14 – 424,398 –
03/05/12 17/06/15 – 424,407 –
16/10/12 17/06/14 – 583,611 –
16/10/12 17/06/15 – 583,619 –
31,712,447 47,183,261
111
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
13 Share options continued
2012/13 2011/12
Date of grant
Exercisable
from
Exercise price
£
Options
Number
Options
Number
Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme 21/04/08 21/04/12 – 145,000 1,530,000
145,000 1,530,000
Store Management Incentive Share Scheme 21/04/09 21/04/12 – 231,000 6,093,077
30/10/09 21/04/12 – – 1,187,642
231,000 7,280,719
UK and International Sharesave 26/10/06 01/12/11 1.97 – 198,143
01/11/07 01/12/12 1.55 139,052 865,966
29/10/08 01/12/11 1.09 – 712,663
29/10/08 01/12/13 1.09 3,116,385 3,292,782
03/11/09 01/12/12 1.72 371,226 2,579,091
03/11/09 01/12/14 1.72 1,087,075 1,192,388
28/10/10 01/12/13 1.87 1,285,330 1,460,422
28/10/10 01/12/15 1.87 599,082 694,101
26/10/11 01/12/14 1.99 2,862,161 3,370,553
26/10/11 01/12/16 1.99 530,998 643,891
19/10/12 01/12/15 2.17 2,275,239 –
19/10/12 01/12/17 2.17 467,618 –
12,734,166 15,010,000
Executive, International Executive 09/04/02 09/04/05 2.90 – 1,194,689
and Phantom Share Option Schemes 09/04/02 09/04/06 2.86 – 701,976
08/10/02 08/10/05 1.95 – 763,347
08/10/02 08/10/06 1.95 – 521,309
17/04/03 17/04/06 2.38 436,215 1,365,947
17/04/03 17/04/07 2.38 331,890 599,100
768,105 5,146,368
Total 62,167,026 92,428,762
The Kingfisher Incentive Share Scheme (‘KISS’) and Performance Share Plan are described as part of the Directors’ Remuneration
Report on pages 45 to 59.
Restricted Awards are granted as one-off compensatory awards granted under the rules of the KISS. They are nil cost options,
as with the KISS, but do not accrue dividends until after they are exercised. Vesting dates may vary according to individual grants.
Certain employees, excluding directors, have been granted contingent share awards under the Kingfisher Retention Share Scheme.
The Store Management Incentive Share Scheme provided provisional awards to store managers in 2009 with vesting dates of
April 2011 and April 2012. There are performance conditions based on store standards and an award will lapse if these are not
maintained throughout the performance period. These awards do not accrue dividends during the vesting period.
Under the UK Sharesave scheme, eligible UK employees have been invited to enter into HMRC approved savings contracts for a
period of three or five years, whereby shares may be acquired with repayments under the contract. The option price is the average
market price over three days prior to an offer to subscribe, discounted by 20%. Options are exercisable within a six month period
from the conclusion of a three or five year period. The International Sharesave scheme, which operates along similar lines to the
UK Sharesave scheme, includes eligible employees in certain overseas locations.
The last grant of options under the Executive, International Executive and Phantom Share Option Schemes was made in April 2003.
Under these schemes, participants received a bi-annual grant of options based on their position in the Group. These options are
normally exercisable from the third anniversary of the date of the grant (up to the tenth anniversary), except where the performance
condition has not been met, in which case this date is deferred accordingly. The performance conditions for all options have now
been met. On the exercise of Phantom Share Options, participants receive in cash the increase in value of the allocated number
of shares in the Company.
The rules of all schemes include provision for the early exercise of options in certain circumstances.
Under FRS 20, ‘Share-based payment’, the Company recognises a charge for share options granted after 7 November 2002.
The Company has not repeated the disclosures required by FRS 20 as these are already included in note 30 of the Kingfisher plc
consolidated financial statements.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
112
ACCOUNTS
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
13 Share options continued
The Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (‘ESOP’)
The ESOP is funded by an interest free loan from the Company of £95m (2011/12: £148m) to enable it to acquire shares in
Kingfisher plc. The shares are used to satisfy options awarded under the KISS, Performance Share Plan, Kingfisher Retention
Share Scheme, Store Management Incentive Share Scheme, Executive, International Executive and Phantom Share
Option Schemes.
The ESOP’s shareholding at 2 February 2013 is 21 million shares (2011/12: 46 million shares) with a nominal value of £3m
(2011/12: £7m) and a market value of £57m (2011/12: £119m). Dividends on these shares were waived for the interim and
final dividends.
14 Contingent liabilities
The Company has arranged for certain guarantees to be provided to third parties in the ordinary course of business. Of these
guarantees, £nil (2011/12: £4m) would crystallise due to possible events not wholly within the Company’s control.
15 Related party transactions
During the year, the Company carried out a number of transactions with related parties in the normal course of business and on
an arm’s length basis. The names of the related parties, the nature of these transactions and their total value are shown below:
2012/13 2011/12
£ millions
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Income/
(expense)
Receivable/
(payable)
Transactions with Koçta s¸ Yapi Marketleri Ticaret A.S. in which the Group holds a 50% interest
Provision of employee services (0.1) – – –
Commission and other income 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4
Transactions with Hornbach Holding A.G. in which the Group holds a 21% interest
Commission and other income – – 0.1 –
Other expenses – – (0.3) –
Transactions with Kingfisher Pension Scheme
Provision of administrative services 1.4 0.1 1.1 –
Services are usually negotiated with related parties on a cost-plus basis. Goods are sold or bought on the basis of the price lists
in force with non-related parties.
Directors’ remuneration and details of share option exercises are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages
45 to 59.
Other transactions with the Kingfisher Pension Scheme are detailed in note 9.
113
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Independent Auditors’ report to the members of Kingfisher plc
We have audited the Company financial statements of
Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 which
comprise the Company balance sheet and the related notes
1 to 15. The financial reporting framework that has been
applied in their preparation is applicable law and United
Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice).
This report is made solely to the Company’s members,
as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the Company’s members those matters
we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for
no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do
not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our
audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities
statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of
the Company financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and
express an opinion on the Company financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and International Standards
on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to
comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards
for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made
by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the financial
statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-
financial information in the annual report to identify material
inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we
become aware of any apparent material misstatements or
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the Company financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs
as at 2 February 2013;
have been properly prepared in accordance with United
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements
of the Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies
Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Directors’ report
for the financial year for which the financial statements are
prepared is consistent with the Company financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters
where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if,
in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
received from branches not visited by us; or
the Company financial statements and the part of the
Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the Group financial statements
of Kingfisher plc for the year ended 2 February 2013 and on
the information in the Directors’ remuneration report that is
described as having been audited.
Panos Kakoullis
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
114
ACCOUNTS
Group five year financial summary
£ millions
2008/09
52 weeks
2009/10
52 weeks
2010/11
52 weeks
2011/12
52 weeks
2012/13
53 weeks
(1)
Income statement
Sales 10,026 10,503 10,450 10,831 10,573
Retail profit 503 664 762 882 781
Central costs (41) (41) (41) (43) (42)
Share of interest and tax of joint ventures and associates (16) (17) (17) (20) (18)
Operating profit before exceptional items 446 606 704 819 721
Net finance costs before financing fair value remeasurements (78) (59) (34) (12) (6)
Adjusted pre-tax profit 368 547 670 807 715
Exceptional items (273) 17 (6) (12) (26)
Financing fair value remeasurements (5) 2 7 2 2
Profit before taxation 90 566 671 797 691
Income tax expense (88) (181) (180) (158) (127)
Profit from continuing operations 2 385 491 639 564
Balance sheet
Goodwill and other intangible assets 2,469 2,465 2,481 2,520 2,565
Property, plant and equipment and investment property 3,723 3,636 3,664 3,722 3,814
Investments in joint ventures and associates 219 234 259 271 289
Net current liabilities
(2)
(278) (648) (576) (290) (128)
Post employment benefits (74) (198) (58) (15) –
Other net non-current liabilities
(2)
(257) (284) (324) (393) (422)
Capital employed 5,802 5,205 5,446 5,815 6,118
Equity shareholders' funds 4,783 4,945 5,452 5,719 6,148
Non-controlling interests 15 10 8 8 8
Net debt/(cash) 1,004 250 (14) 88 (38)
Capital employed 5,802 5,205 5,446 5,815 6,118
Other financial data
Like-for-like sales growth (4.1%) (1.5%) (0.9%) 1.3% (2.9%)
Effective tax rate 31% 30% 29% 28% 27%
Basic earnings per share (pence) 0.2 16.5 21.0 27.5 24.1
Adjusted basic earnings per share (pence) 11.0 16.4 20.5 25.1 22.3
Dividend per share (pence) 5.325 5.5 7.07 8.84 9.46
Gross capital expenditure
(3)
390 256 310 450 316
(1) Like-for-like sales growth in 2012/13 is calculated by comparing 53 weeks against the equivalent 53 weeks of the prior year. This only impacts the UK &
Ireland businesses with all of the other businesses reporting on a calendar basis. The effect of the 53rd week on the results of the Group is the inclusion
of an additional £72m sales and an immaterial benefit to retail profit.
(2) Net current liabilities and other net non-current liabilities reported above exclude any components of net debt/(cash).
(3) Excluding business acquisitions.
115
Business review Governance Accounts
www.king?sher.com
ACCOUNTS
Shareholder information
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of Kingfisher plc will be held
on Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 11.00am at the Paddington
London Hilton Hotel, 146 Praed Street, London W2 1EE.
Financial calendar
The proposed financial calendar for 2013/14 is as follows:
First quarter results 30 May 2013
Pre-close first half trading results 24 July 2013
Interim results to 27 July 2013 11 September 2013
Third quarter results 28 November 2013
Fourth quarter results February 2014
Preliminary results to 1 February 2014 March 2014
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 6ZZ
Telephone: 0870 702 0129
Website: http://www.investorcentre.co.uk
Shareholder enquiries
Any queries that shareholders have regarding their
shareholdings, such as a change of name or address, transfer
of shares, lost share certificates or dividend cheques, should
be referred to the Registrar using the contact details above. A
Shareholder Helpline is available on UK business days between
8.30am and 5.30pm and contains an automated self-service
functionality which is available 24 hours a day.
Share dealing facilities
Shareholders have the opportunity to buy or sell Kingfisher plc
shares using a share dealing facility operated by the Registrar.
Telephone share dealing: Commission is 1%, plus £35; stamp
duty at 0.5% is payable on purchases. The service is available
from 8.00am to 4.30pm Monday to Friday excluding bank
holidays. Telephone: 0870 703 0084.
Internet share dealing: Commission is 1%, subject to a
minimum charge of £30; stamp duty at 0.5% is payable on
purchases. The service is available to place orders out of
market hours.
Simply log onto http://www.investorcentre.co.uk.
Terms and conditions of both of these services can be obtained
by calling 0870 702 0129.
Unauthorised brokers (boiler room scams)
Kingfisher plc is legally obliged to make its share register
available to the general public. Consequently some shareholders
may receive unsolicited mail, including correspondence from
unauthorised investment companies. We have become aware
that some shareholders have received unsolicited phone calls
or correspondence concerning investment matters. These
are typically from overseas based brokers who target UK
shareholders offering to sell what often turn out to be worthless
or high risk shares in US or UK investments. They can be very
persistent and extremely persuasive. Shareholders are advised
to be very wary of any unsolicited advice, offers to buy shares
at a discount or offers of free company reports. Details of any
share dealing facilities that the Company endorses will be
included in Company mailings.
Share price history
£ per ordinary share* Dollars per ADR**
Financial year High Low High Low
2012/13 3.14 2.54 9.98 7.81
2011/12 2.87 2.17 9.34 6.91
2010/11 2.72 1.96 8.16 5.93
2009/10 2.47 1.18 8.24 3.15
2008/09 1.53 0.91 5.45 3.53
* Based on the daily closing price of Kingfisher plc shares on the London
Stock Exchange
** Based on the daily closing price of Kingfisher plc ADR’s in the Over-the-
Counter (OTC) market
Dividend
The interim dividend for the financial year ended 2 February
2013 of 3.09p per share was paid on 16 November 2012.
The table below provides the payment information for the final
dividend of 6.37p per share, subject to shareholder approval
at the Annual General Meeting on 13 June 2013:
Ex-dividend date 8 May 2013
Record date 10 May 2013
Final date for return of DRIP mandate
forms/currency elections 24 May 2013
Euro exchange rate notification 29 May 2013
Payment date and DRIP purchase 17 June 2013
Payment methods
Shareholders can elect to receive their dividends in a number
of ways:
Cheque cash dividends will automatically be paid to
shareholders by cheque, which will be sent by post to the
shareholder’s registered address;
BACS cash dividends can be paid by mandate directly to a UK
bank or building society account through the BACS system.
This method of payment reduces the risk of your cheque
being intercepted or lost in the post. Shareholders wishing to
receive their dividends in this way can update their mandate
instructions at www.investorcentre.co.uk or should complete
a dividend mandate form and return it to the Registrars;
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) the Company also
offers shareholders a DRIP, whereby shareholders can use
their cash dividend to buy further shares in the Company.
Shareholders can apply online at www.investorcentre.co.uk or
complete a mandate form and return it to the address shown
above; and
Global Payments Service this service, provided by the
Registrar enables shareholders to have dividend payments
paid directly into their bank account in their chosen local
currency. To view terms and register, please visit
www.computershare.com/uk/investor/GPS.
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
116
ACCOUNTS
Shareholder information continued
American Depositary Receipt (ADR)
The Company has a Sponsored Level 1 ADR programme in the
United States. Each ADR represents two Kingfisher shares.
Electronic communication
Shareholders who have not yet elected to receive shareholder
documentation in electronic form can sign up by visiting
www.investorcentre.co.uk/ecomms and registering their details.
When registering for electronic communications, shareholders
will be sent an email each time the Company publishes statutory
documents, providing a link to the information.
Electing for electronic communications does not mean that
shareholders cannot obtain hard copy documents. Should
shareholders require a paper copy of any of the Company’s
shareholder documentation, they should contact the Registrar
at the address stated under the section headed ‘Registrar’.
Corporate website
Shareholders are encouraged to visit Kingfisher’s corporate
website (www.kingfisher.com). The website includes information
about the Company, its strategy and business performance,
latest news and press releases and approach to corporate
governance. The Investor Relations section is a key tool for
shareholders, with information of share price, financial results,
shareholders meetings and dividends. This section also contains
frequently asked questions and copies of the current and past
annual reports.
Kingfisher has an Investor Relations app for the iPad. The app
provides access to the latest share price information, corporate
news, financial reports, presentations, corporate videos and
earnings webcasts both online and offline. It is updated with the
latest financial information at the same time as the corporate
website. To discover more, download it free from the App store.
Document viewing
Shareholders will have the opportunity to view certain
documentation as outlined in the Notice of Annual General
Meeting from at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting, until its
conclusion. The Articles of Association of the Company and
other documentation referred to in this Annual Report can be
viewed at the registered office during normal business hours.
Company Secretary and Registered Office
Paul Moore
Kingfisher plc
3 Sheldon Square
Paddington
London W2 6PX
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7372 8008
Fax: +44 (0)20 7644 1001
www.kingfisher.com
Registered in England and Wales
Registered Number 01664812
Forward-looking statements
Certain statements included in this Annual Report and
Accounts are forward-looking and should be considered,
amongst other statutory provisions, in light of the safe harbour
provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than historical facts
may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are
therefore subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied because they relate to future events.
These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements relating to the Company’s expectations around
the Company’s programme known as ‘Creating the Leader’
and its associated eight steps.
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
relevant terminology including the words: “believes”,
“estimates”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”,
“goal”, “target”, “aim”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “could” or
“should” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or
comparable terminology and include all matters that are not
historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout
this Annual Report and Accounts and include statements
regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations and
those of our officers, directors and employees concerning,
amongst other things, our results of operations, financial
condition, changes in tax rates, liquidity, prospects, growth,
strategies and the businesses we operate.
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those estimated by the forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, global economic business conditions,
monetary and interest rate policies, foreign currency exchange
rates, equity and property prices, the impact of competition,
inflation and deflation, changes to regulations, taxes and
legislation, changes to consumer saving and spending
habits; and our success in managing these factors.
Consequently, our actual future financial condition,
performance and results could differ materially from the
plans, goals and expectations set out in our forward-looking
statements. Reliance should not be placed on any forward-
looking statement. The forward-looking statements contained
herein speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and the
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
King?sher is included in two socially responsible indices, the FTSE4Good
and Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes.
For more information please visit www.king?sher.com
This document is printed on UPM Fine Offset, a paper containing virgin
?bre sourced from well managed, responsible, FSC® certi?ed forests.
100% of the inks used are vegetable oil based, 95% of press chemicals
are recycled for further use and, on average 99% of any waste
associated with this production will be recycled.
Printed by Park Communications on FSC® certi?ed paper.
Park is an EMAS certi?ed CarbonNeutral® Company and its
Environmental Management System is certi?ed to ISO14001
Designed and produced by Black Sun Plc www.blacksunplc.com
King?sher plc, 3 Sheldon Square, Paddington, London W2 6PX Telephone: +44 (0)20 7372 8008 www.king?sher.com
doc_215632582.pdf