India's 'monster eater' retires

Rappai says he has other things to worry about apart from food

Restaurant owners in the town of Trissur in the Indian state of Kerala can breathe a huge sigh of relief - the "monster eater" is retiring. They can now think again about launching "eat as much as you like" lunches and buffets. That is because Rappai - the man with the giant appetite - has been warned by medics to curb his food intake. In his prime it would have been an under-statement to describe Rappai's appetite as voracious. 'Unlimited meals' This was a man who quite easily could plough his way through two buckets of rice and accompanying chicken and vegetable dishes. For breakfast it was said he could devour 75 idlies (rice cakes) and still have room for more. On one famous occasion, the man who locally became known as Theeta (monster eater) took advantage of a local restaurant's "unlimited meals" coupon. He reputedly scoffed three bucketfuls of rice, one bucket of fish curry and 10 kgs of cooked meat.
The restaurant in question ran out of food, and police had to be called in to restore order as a large crowd gathered to watch Rappai in action. The BBC's Sridevi Pillai in Trivandrum says that such eating extravaganzas became more commonplace as Rappai's fame spread throughout the state. A regular at Kerala's informal eating competitions, Rappai is also credited on one day with ploughing his way through 700 idlies on top of 10 kgs of halwa (an Indian dessert). No wonder then that when hoteliers saw this cheerful man majestically walking around the town - adorned in khaki shirt and white dhoti - they would hastily put up the shutters of their premises and close down. Turn violent But now 64-year-old Rappai's huge appetite has had to be curtailed because he recently developed a severe stomach ache. He was told in no uncertain terms to eat less or face the consequences. "I am diabetic and my body weight was too heavy at around 115kg," he said. "I have decided to listen to the doctors. I think I have lost the power to digest food. My friends, especially my police friends, have advised me to eat more carefully.
o.gif

_41928426_rappaiqb.jpg

start_quote_rb.gif
My heavy eating days are over, there will be no more competitions for me
end_quote_rb.gif





Rappai refers to his "police friends" for good reason: there were times that hoteliers became so enraged at his capacity to eat huge amounts of food that situations sometimes threatened to turn violent. Police rescued him several times, on occasion even taking him back to the station for a little more food. Today Rappai is resting at his home at Kizhakkumpattukara in Trissur. He says that other things to worry about apart from his stomach. "I have my 90-year-old mother to look after," he says, "and now have to cope with tremendous change in my life. "Gone are the days of unbridled consumption of idlies, halwa and buckets full of boiled rice. "My heavy eating days are over," he says. "There will be no more competitions for me." "Now I only take a bowl of Kanji (rice gruel) for breakfast and a little rice for lunch and dinner. Rappai gives a toothless grin. "Anyway I have lost all my teeth because of over-consumption of sweets."



 
kartik said:
WRONG .. ethically, the man can afford that dish as he pays for it. Ofcourse its ethical to eat as much as he wants, as in the example of the diamond in my previous posts.

Buddy, its not that... ethically, he shouldn't eat the food meant for 10-15 ppl just bcoz he can afford it. Something like, if a free dharamshala gives lodging for travellers to stay, that doesn't mean that u can permanently occupy a room there. Logically u can, but ethics don't support it.


kartik said:
The management wont increase the price. They are not dumb. Either they wil set a maximum limit for the price they ask... or they wil close that scheme / promo.
huh? nope....!! The mgmt has to or how else will they get the money... The max limit can't be set... bcoz it is eat as much as u can, for this price... As for closing this scheme, that would be the only alternative, or else they go bankrupt.
 
ethically, he shouldn't eat the food meant for 10-15 ppl just bcoz he can afford it. Something like, if a free dharamshala gives lodging for travellers to stay, that doesn't mean that u can permanently occupy a room there. Logically u can, but ethics don't support it.

In this case, its not FREE.... its not a dharmshala.. its not a donation.. its a PAID service.. the customer is clearly told.. eat as much as you can..but u need to pay so and so amount..

As i mentioned earlier.. its like purchasing that diamond..
 
kartik said:
In this case, its not FREE.... its not a dharmshala.. its not a donation.. its a PAID service.. the customer is clearly told.. eat as much as you can..but u need to pay so and so amount..

As i mentioned earlier.. its like purchasing that diamond..
u r concentrating on the wrong idea buddy..... what i want to point out here is that even though u get free stuff at the end (despite paying for one but u still get unlimited amount to eat), there is still a limit to follow.... Just bcoz u have a glutton's appetite and are legally allowed to eat, doesn't mean u don't follow the ethics.

Am i ringing a bell by now?
 
lol.. ring a bell ? thats wht i m tryin to do since the past couplea hrs..

Get your idea straight about "ethics" .

If a nutcase sells his million dollar property for 2 $ and some1 else buys it.. its not unethical on the part of the person buying it... its dumb of the person selling it..

Obviously the food isnt free.. because he has paid for " Unlimited meal " . If he doesnt PAY for it, then its unethical.. else its just DUMB on the part of the hotelier.
 
kartik said:
lol.. ring a bell ? thats wht i m tryin to do since the past couplea hrs..

Get your idea straight about "ethics" .

If a nutcase sells his million dollar property for 2 $ and some1 else buys it.. its not unethical on the part of the person buying it... its dumb of the person selling it..

Obviously the food isnt free.. because he has paid for " Unlimited meal " . If he doesnt PAY for it, then its unethical.. else its just DUMB on the part of the hotelier.
Why ur example doesn't hold good here.... bcoz the millionaire (the hotel) is not selling his million dollar property (the unlimited meals) to this one guy. They are putting the sign as to "Come one person and eat everything , whatever we have in our hotel" (that's what u're indicating as selling everything of his property)

When u see such a scheme, it is obvious that the amount of food to be ethically eaten by a person is that of a normal diet... and NOT a glutton's diet... Any biz is bound to go in the drain otherwise.

Obviously, from this one can say its not dumb on the part of the hotelier bcoz this is the fact. If the guy, eats everything that is in store, then it is bound to create problems and it is again, quite unethical too. Again, i am saying all ur statements are logically based, so the argument can't be cleared unless u start think in the sense of the ethics.

Ethics don't only indicate that u pay but also that u eat a normal man's diet, even if its unlimited.
 
he amount of food to be ethically eaten by a person is that of a normal diet

Ethics don't only indicate that u pay but also that u eat a normal man's diet, even if its unlimited.

2 words ... BS ... there is nothing like a ethical diet..

Its pathetic argument when you say a man should eat a normal mans diet..

Its unethical if you dont allow the man to eat as much as he wants to.. because its a unlimited meal.. and its only ethical for him to eat as much as he wants to .. unless he is filled .

Its not only logical , its ethical...

Your argument indicates that if a person has mediclaim and he is incurs a huge expenditure.. it is unethical of him to reimburse the full amount..

ROLF .. get your facts straight about ethics and business.
 
kartik said:
2 words ... BS ... there is nothing like a ethical diet..

Its pathetic argument when you say a man should eat a normal mans diet..

Its unethical if you dont allow the man to eat as much as he wants to.. because its a unlimited meal.. and its only ethical for him to eat as much as he wants to .. unless he is filled .

Its not only logical , its ethical...

Your argument indicates that if a person has mediclaim and he is incurs a huge expenditure.. it is unethical of him to reimburse the full amount..

ROLF .. get your facts straight about ethics and business.

Let me take it one at a time.... BS... ? that's what u think.

It might be pathetic to say that for a normal person, but not someone who gobbles up the whole restaurant. Unlimited meals doesn't mean that u swoop everything present in the restaurant such that the restaurant closes the next day.

The example doesn't hold good here, bcoz when u take insurance, the policy entitles u to a specified amount. It doesn't mean bankrupting the company, then how can any insurance comapny work.

The basic idea which i have been repeating is that such people are just a burden in an already huner-stricken nation like ours, even though they have the power to pay. Think of it like this, u might be able to pay for the electricity u use, even if u waste more than 50% of it, but it is unethical bcoz u are actually becoming a burden on the nation.
 
The example doesn't hold good here, bcoz when u take insurance, the policy entitles u to a specified amount. It doesn't mean bankrupting the company, then how can any insurance comapny work.

Total BS again.. its obvious that the insurance example best explains this case.
On top the restaura doesnt go bankrupt in just 1 day.. No restaura will..if it does.. its no good for business anyway..

As for hunger stricken and blah blah.. we already argued it out .

Get your facts straight jack.

Every business has its RISKS.. insurance has its own risks.. this restaura has its own.. Face it or shut down.
 
kartik said:
Total BS again.. its obvious that the insurance example best explains this case.

Really? how? i told ya that they have fixed schemes and hence acc to that u pay premium and that is the value of the insured amount, u get.

kartik said:
On top the restaura doesnt go bankrupt in just 1 day.. No restaura will..if it does.. its no good for business anyway..
yeah, but if such people keep coming, it won't take more than a week.

kartik said:
As for hunger stricken and blah blah.. we already argued it out .

Get your facts straight jack.

lolzz.... i am gaurav, not jack :p

kartik said:
Every business has its RISKS.. insurance has its own risks.. this restaura has its own.. Face it or shut down.

agreed, but our point discussion is how good such ppl are for a ntion like ours.
 
yeah, but if such people keep coming, it won't take more than a week.

There are no " such people" . He is one of a kind. Hence the glory.

Really? how? i told ya that they have fixed schemes and hence acc to that u pay premium and that is the value of the insured amount, u get.

Dont tell me I need to spoon feed you. Some time you talk like you are in kindergarten.

Tell me Jack.. are you really that slow or is it a " When I cant argue with someone, I just blabber something really dumb" phobia ?


Insurance business has its own risks. A big casualty , huge claimants and the company can go bankrupt. Ofcourse there is a calculated limit but if the damages done go way above their calculations, they have to shut down their business.

Same in this case, unlimited food means... risks are calculated, but some unusual guy like our maverick can swoop down the whole restaura.. theres nothing unethical in it.
 
kartik said:
There are no " such people" . He is one of a kind. Hence the glory.

Dont tell me I need to spoon feed you. Some time you talk like you are in kindergarten.

Tell me Jack.. are you really that slow or is it a " When I cant argue with someone, I just blabber something really dumb" phobia ?


Insurance business has its own risks. A big casualty , huge claimants and the company can go bankrupt. Ofcourse there is a calculated limit but if the damages done go way above their calculations, they have to shut down their business.

Same in this case, unlimited food means... risks are calculated, but some unusual guy like our maverick can swoop down the whole restaura.. theres nothing unethical in it.

Well he can be one kind, two kinds or a 100 kinds... what difference does it make?

Do u think, that the insurance guys would pay u for a new bike, if u insure a bicycle... now without digressing from the point.... what i said was, that ur example of insurance company doesn't hold valid bco those guys have a limit and obviously, they caluclate the limits.... they know that this particular guy has insured for this amount and hence his entitlement... but the restaurant if offering unlimited amount of food.... So THERE IS ACTUALLY NO LIMIT (see the difference now? )

Now when they give out free food (or unlimited food) , that doesn't mean that one guy can swoop down the whole thing....

Now i don't feel the need to re-iterate my points unless u have a new argument...

p.s. Don't mix ethics and logic... bcozz from post 0, ur points are only logical.:bump:
 
Wrong again.. From post 1 I have kept asking you to " get your facts straight " about ethics. Now obviously, I m not going to spoon feed you on what it means.

What I furthur notice is that Its jus dumb to argue with a chinese guy in english (assuming he doesnt know english).

Thirdly, its not a free meal.. its a unlimited meal.. its only ethical for the guy to enjoy as much as he wishes to.. Look up the dictionary if you dont know the difference between a free meal and a Paid unlimited meal

Now, I will wait for the chinese guy to learn english and get back to me.. else its just like " Bhais k aage bhagwat " which is not my cup of tea.
 
well buddy,
getting off the track and then correcting u, is also not my cup of tea , so i do expect the chinese guy to learn English...

ok, if u are so hell bent, i will call it an unlimited meal only... but, it is UNETHICAL for one man to gobble up the restaurant even if it is unlimited. By unlimited, the restaurant, doesn't expect one man to finish off their reserves. Logical, that he can eat... but not ethical.

Don't go by the theory that he can eat as much as he wants to, bcoz the restaurant says so (that's logical but not ethical)

Now, unless my knowledgeable friend acknowledges this fact, its just "bhais ke aage been bajana"
 
I see you havnt yet learned english.. and are not yet clear on the meaning of ethics and morality.. you can post in a reply and demonstrate your ignorant self and let people enjoy it :)
 
kartik said:
I see you havnt yet learned english.. and are not yet clear on the meaning of ethics and morality.. you can post in a reply and demonstrate your ignorant self and let people enjoy it :)
Looks like u got nothing else to add, that's why u are stuck in ur ignorance!

Never mind... take a break, think hard and come back tomorrow with fresh arguments...... i will still be all urs baby!! :tongue: :tongue:
 
That was really a very good Post......................... never heard of anything like that before , n was enthralled to see it !
 
Looks like u got nothing else to add, that's why u are stuck in ur ignorance!

Ofcourse I got nothing to add... Id rather not debate what 1337 * 2 is with a person who doesnt know to count 1 to 10 :)
 
kartik said:
Ofcourse I got nothing to add... Id rather not debate what 1337 * 2 is with a person who doesnt know to count 1 to 10 :)
lolzzzzzzz

buddy, no wonder i said what i said in my last post. u have already been brain washed... So take a break and then u would realise that we were actually talking about some topic and not mathematics! :tongue:

btw, do u still wanna talk ethically, or are u stuck up on logic? :pound:
 
lolzzzzzzz

buddy, no wonder i said what i said in my last post. u have already been brain washed... So take a break and then u would realise that we were actually talking about some topic and not mathematics! :tongue:

btw, do u still wanna talk ethically, or are u stuck up on logic?

Dont make a fool out of yourself when the world is watching :)
 
Back
Top