ICL VS BCCI

BCCI will definately exist because it will promote players to international cricket while guys who are with ICL will get banned from playing international cricket...
 
cant answer the qs exactly but ICL would be a good competition domestically. we will have different organisations playing cricket by choosing their own players. loads of talent in india but only few get an oppurnity. the BCC would have much more options to choose the best of players
 
In the current scinario i think that BCCI has a edge over ICL because of the political and money power and because of this the ICL has not been in the position to attract the current international players. These are the visible reason but their are other reasons also , BCCI has been working for more than 50 years and in these years its built a lot of resources like stadiams and to build this amount of resourcs the ICL has to work for at least 10 years.
 
BCCI must be having edge over ICL, but ICL actually started valueing ranji players and paid them handsomely compared to BCCI. BCCI just copied ICL and increased the pay scale of their ranji players, to retain them....

ICL has given more opturnity for to our ranji players compared to BCCI who propogated international players in IPL.

I support ICL.....
 
BCCI and ICL both should co-exist for the time being. But it is possible that in the near future, ICL may be finally merged with BCCI and will field its own team in domestic competetion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top