Fight Against Employee Discrimination with ebinjury.com

State and federal laws have been made to protect employees and other people from being harassed from many discriminated cases. The laws look after people in service against discrimination based on gender, race, religion, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity and other factors. Americans with Disabilities Act is the most important part of legislation that covers up facts of disability discrimination. At ebinjury.com[/b] the lawyers are very skilled and professional and fight against the discrimination holders to give the victim value of his harassment.

If any person is being harassed in office place then there are some things which must be followed by them to tackle the issues and to fight against the discrimination. First of all, one must concern with the employer about their feelings to know the reaction of the employer. Sometimes many employers make unintentional discrimination and thus it is imperative for them to know about their rude and illegal behavior. In the first place the employer will never admit about their discrimination but if the problem gets solved by discussing then well and good. Otherwise federal laws and right are available for the people to tackle the issues. Ebinjury.com based on tackling all discrimination issues faced by people.

It is important for an employee to know that their employees or a particular person with whom the discrimination is going is serious about the matter. The employee must ensure that each time a discrimination incident occurs they must make a report of that incident as a proof. Request that for an examination into the subject and that remedial action is taken against the lawbreaker. Employers must punctually look into all employee discrimination and harassment reports on time.

However, employee discrimination law does not prohibit all discriminatory actions and based on some facts that come under federal law such as age, gender, color, disability, religion, race, sex and union activity.

If a company decides to stand his/her choice on race, they can officially be in difficulty for discrimination. If an underground employee is paid less money than his/her equivalent members due to competition, the employer could be in problem for discrimination since it goes against the law Title VII. If in case an employer is paying less money to his equal employer in order to the fact that they are performing different tasks then it doesn’t come under illegal issues but if two employees performing the same task; same experience and getting different payment the it comes under illegal task.

Title VII also prohibits manners that have the effect of discriminating against people of a secluded class even though the motive for the behavior difference is not because of a protected class. The American with Disabilities Act categorizes discrimination not only based on the term of both unequal impact and action but also in terms of negative response to give coherent place to an otherwise proficient individual with a disability. However, if it can be seen more closely, the rule excessively rules out female candidates against male candidates because women likely to be custodial parents.

 
Laws at both federal and state levels in the United States aim to protect individuals from harassment and discrimination in employment and other contexts. These laws specifically prohibit discrimination based on a range of protected characteristics.

Protected Characteristics Under Federal Law:

The primary federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination are enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Key laws include:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964:Prohibits discrimination based on:
    • Race
    • Color
    • Religion
    • Sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity)
    • National OriginThis law applies to private and state/local government employers with 15 or more employees.
  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967: Protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from discrimination.
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (Title I): Prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with a disability in all employment practices. It also requires employers to provide "reasonable accommodations" to disabled employees unless doing so would cause "undue hardship." The ADA also covers discrimination based on a history of disability or if an employer mistakenly perceives an individual as having a disability.
  • The Equal Pay Act (EPA) of 1963: Prohibits sex-based wage discrimination, requiring equal pay for equal work in jobs requiring equal skill, effort, and responsibility, performed under similar working conditions.
  • The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008: Prohibits discrimination based on an individual's genetic information, including family medical history.
These laws cover all aspects of employment, including hiring, firing, compensation, assignments, promotions, training, benefits, and harassment. They also prohibit retaliation against individuals who complain about discrimination or participate in discrimination investigations.

Tackling Workplace Harassment and Discrimination:

If an individual experiences harassment or discrimination in the workplace, several steps are recommended:

  1. Communicate with the Employer: Initially, it's often advisable to inform the employer or the specific individual about the unwelcome behavior. Sometimes, discrimination may be unintentional, and direct communication can resolve the issue.
  2. Document Incidents: It is crucial to meticulously record every incident of discrimination or harassment. This includes dates, times, locations, details of what was said or done, and names of involved parties or witnesses. Such documentation serves as vital proof.
  3. Request an Investigation and Remedial Action: Formally request an internal investigation into the matter and demand that appropriate corrective action be taken against the perpetrator. Employers have a legal obligation to promptly investigate all reports of employee discrimination and harassment.
  4. Know Your Rights and Federal Laws: If internal discussions or investigations do not resolve the issue, individuals have the right to pursue action under federal laws. Organizations like the EEOC are responsible for enforcing these laws.
Disparate Treatment vs. Disparate Impact:

Employment discrimination law recognizes two main types of discrimination:

  • Disparate Treatment: This refers to intentional discrimination where an employer treats an individual or a group less favorably because of their protected characteristic. For example, if an employer explicitly pays a woman less than a man for performing the exact same job with the same experience solely because of her gender, this would be disparate treatment. Similarly, refusing to hire someone based on their race is direct disparate treatment.
  • Disparate Impact (or Adverse Impact): This refers to unintentional discrimination where a seemingly neutral employment policy or practice, applied equally to all, has a disproportionately negative effect on individuals belonging to a protected class. For instance, a height requirement for a job might disproportionately exclude women or certain racial groups, even if there's no intent to discriminate. Another example could be a standardized test that disproportionately screens out minority candidates if it's not directly related to job performance and a business necessity. The text mentions a rule that "excessively rules out female candidates against male candidates because women likely to be custodial parents," which, if proven to have a disproportionate negative impact without a business necessity, could be an example of disparate impact.
It's important to note that while discrimination based on protected characteristics is illegal, employers are generally permitted to pay different wages for different tasks or based on legitimate factors like experience, skill, or performance, as long as these decisions are not rooted in discriminatory intent or have an unjustified disparate impact on a protected group.
 
Back
Top