Death penalty for Mattoo's killer

Santosh Kumar Singh, the man convicted by the Delhi High Court for raping and murdering 23-year-old Delhi University law student Priyadarshini Mattoo on January 23, 1996, was given the death sentence by Delhi High Court on Monday.

Bringing closure to a relentless campaign for justice by her family and civil society, the Delhi HC on Monday ruled that Santosh Singh "will hang till death".

Pronouncing the judgment, the bench comprising Justices R.S. Sodhi and P.K. Bhasin said: "The aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances and the convict, therefore, deserves no other sentence than death sentence."

The bench also observed that Santosh Kumar had been stalking Mattoo for more than two years "before actually sexually assaulting her and then killing her in a dastardly manner".

Addressing a jam-packed room, the bench said he should be "hanged till death".

Santosh Kumar Singh was present outside the courtroom and broke down when he heard the verdict. His father J.P. Singh, a senior retired Delhi Police official, consoled him.

A lawyer for the prosecution later told reporters that the court realised that Santosh Kumar deserved the death penalty and so accordingly gave it to him - almost three years after a lower court acquitted him of the crime on Dec 3, 1999.

A family member of the 23-year-old Mattoo, who was brutally killed and raped despite complaining more than once about Santosh Kumar stalking her, said the credit for the sentencing went "110 per cent" to the media, which he said was responsible for highlighting the injustice done by the lower court.

Another family member described it as "a historic judgement" that would set "a precedent, a deterrent".

"I thank the millions of people in Delhi, outside Delhi and also abroad who stood by us through e-mail and other forms of protest."

Earlier in the day, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Monday argued for death to Santosh Kumar. Additional Solicitor General A.K. Sinha said it was a "rarest of rare case" as the crime was committed in a diabolical and dastardly manner.

He said Santosh Kumar had caused 19 injuries on the body of Mattoo, broken her three ribs and then raped and murdered her.

A CBI lawyer described the death sentence as a victory for the investigating agency and the judicial system.

Santosh Kumar's counsel R.K. Naseem had sought life imprisonment, saying his conduct had been clean after the murder. He said Santosh Kumar was young and had a two-year-old daughter besides a mentally challenged elder brother to take care of.

The division bench had Oct 17 termed the lower court judgment acquitting Santosh Kumar as perverse and held that both charges of rape and murder had been proved by the prosecution.

It said Santosh Kumar was convicted because the prosecution had been able to prove the case by making "an unbroken chain of circumstances pointing to the culpability of the accused".
 
Mattoo case: A chronology of events

Following is the chronology of the events in the sensational case of rape and murder of Priyadarshini Mattoo.

January 23, 1996: Priyadarshini Mattoo raped and killed allegedly by Santosh Kumar Singh. Delhi Police registers FIR.

January 25, 1996: Case handed over to the CBI. Agency registers case.

April 11, 1996: CBI files chargesheet in the case against Santosh Singh.

June 20, 1996: Date of committal of the case to Additional Sessions Judge General B B Chowdhury.

August 29, 1996: Charges framed.

August 11, 1997: Trial starts in the court of Additional Solicitor General S C Mittal.

January 3, 1998: Prosecution evidence closes. 50 witnesses examined by the court. No Defence witness.

April 18, 1998: Arguments closed in the case but was marred by a controversy of allegations of money changing hands ahead of judgement. The case was transferred to ASJ G P Thareja.

April 21, 1998: Case admitted with Thareja

June 1, 1998: Thareja summons two prosecution witnesses -- Inspector Lalit Mohan of Delhi Police and Prof G V Rao of Microbiological Centre.

June 1, 1998: CBI submits case diaries before Additional Sessions Judge Thareja.

Nov 30, 1998: ASJ Thareja begins hearing Defence and Prosecution witnesses.

March 31, 1999: Examination of witnesses closes.

December 3, 1999: ASJ Thareja delivers judgement; Santosh Singh acquitted; CBI lashed for shoddy investigations.

Feb 29, 2000: CBI appeals in Delhi High Court.

April 26, 2000: High Court admits appeal.

Oct 17, 2000: High Court issues bailable warrant against Santosh Singh.

Dec 17, 2001: CBI files appeal for early hearing before High Court.

Nov 25, 2002: CBI files application before High Court for early hearing.

Feb 14, 2003: Accused files application for inspection of files.

March 25, 2003: High Court dismisses the application.

July 22, 2006: CBI files another application for early hearing.

July 28, 2006: Delhi High Court fixes August 31 as date for hearing.

August 31, 2006: High Court orders daily hearings in the case.

Sept 27, 2006: High Court reserves judgment in the case. CBI seeks action against five Delhi Police officials.

Oct 17, 2006: High court convicts Santosh Singh for raping and killing Priyadarshini Mattoo.
 
A family member of the 23-year-old Mattoo said the credit for the sentencing went "110 per cent" to the media, which he said was responsible for highlighting the injustice done by the lower court.

As i always say that media plays a very big role in helping the criminal to be brought to the justice. Even though the case took 10 yrs to be solved, but media played a big role by highlighting it in front of the common man.
 
Well the much awaited and the most talked about judgement finally delivered..............It feels sad that........our judicial system........is known for the long time.......it takes for giving a judgement.............but the only ray of hope in this case is that atleast the gulity is punished.........and the family of the deceased have finally able the get the justice............inspite.......of corruption and money hovering over the case.......

Well yes............now the judgements..........of other imp cases like........Jessica Lal and Nitish Katara.........case is eagerly awaited..........hope the case also recieves...............a fair judgement..............All we can do is just hope........and see what happens...........

:SugarwareZ-229:
 
Back
Top