wat u all think is test cricket really diminishing???
wat will happen to ODI's later if there is quick format like 20-20??
is the idea of SACHINTENDULAR gud enuf of spliting the ODI innings in 2 ...???
do reply...
Certainly 20-20 has turned more exciting than 50-50. People want to enjoy more n more at every moment,i.e, enjoying on each and every ball of match. 20-20 thus saves time for them.
People's perception generally to a 50-50 game now is watching or knowing score @ frequent intervals of the match rather than seeing it whole day.
Moreover, if we observe most people like to see the match in the later part of the innings (i.e. during last 5-10 overs) which are more exciting.
20-20 is a short span excitement game with each side playing aggressively in entire innings and agitating the killing/aggressive spirit in cricket lovers.
50-50 can be turned more exciting either by changing certain rules which can add excitement for cricket lovers.
Sachin's idea can also work well provided they try to implement it. However, I wonder if there was some other person instead of Sachin, media or any other person would have grilled that person for commenting to amend the 50-50 rules
Sachin said to break 50-50 in 25-25 of two innings. I think it can add a lot of excitement to people provided they make a good strategic move.