Is Sexism Still Common in Sports Commentary?

The Unseen Foul That Keeps Happening On-Air


When we tune into a sports match, we expect fair analysis, excitement, and maybe even some humor. What we don’t expect—but still too often hear—is subtle, or sometimes blatant, sexism in sports commentary. Despite the massive progress women have made in sports, the commentary box seems to be lagging behind, echoing outdated attitudes and gender stereotypes that are far past their expiration date.


Let’s be real: if a male athlete shows passion, he’s a leader—but when a female athlete does the same, she’s “emotional.” When male commentators analyze men’s performance, they focus on strength, strategy, and skill. But when it’s women on the field, the talk often turns to appearance, outfits, or even their personal lives. Why is Serena Williams discussed for her body while Novak Djokovic is praised for his backhand?


And it’s not just about the athletes. Women in the commentary booth face a double standard too. Many have to work twice as hard to prove they belong. If a male commentator makes a mistake, it's brushed off. But if a woman stumbles—even slightly—critics flood social media questioning her "credentials." It’s not uncommon to hear that she was “only hired for diversity” or “doesn’t understand the game,” despite often having more experience or formal training than her male counterparts.


The issue isn’t just frustrating—it’s harmful. It reinforces the idea that women are outsiders in the world of sports, both on the field and behind the mic. And when millions are listening, that message can shape attitudes for generations.


But here’s the flip side: change is happening, and it's loud. More women are claiming their space in sports media—bringing not only insight and professionalism, but also challenging the outdated norms with every word they speak. Audiences are also becoming more aware, calling out sexist remarks and demanding better representation.


Still, one question remains: If sports are about merit, fairness, and respect—shouldn't the commentary reflect that too?


Sexism in sports commentary isn’t just a bad habit. It’s a foul play that needs a red card.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

Sports commentary should celebrate skill and strategy, not stereotypes. Yet sexism still sneaks into broadcasts—female athletes are called “emotional” while men are “leaders,” and women’s looks get more airtime than their performance.


Women commentators face harsher criticism than men, often accused of being there just for diversity, regardless of their expertise. This bias sidelines women and harms the sport’s image.


The good news? More women are breaking barriers in sports media, and audiences are calling out sexist comments.


If sports stand for fairness, so should the commentary booth. Sexism on air isn’t just outdated—it’s a foul that deserves a red card.

 

[Subiksha Anand]

The Unseen Foul That Keeps Happening On-Air


When we tune into a sports match, we expect fair analysis, excitement, and maybe even some humor. What we don’t expect—but still too often hear—is subtle, or sometimes blatant, sexism in sports commentary. Despite the massive progress women have made in sports, the commentary box seems to be lagging behind, echoing outdated attitudes and gender stereotypes that are far past their expiration date.


Let’s be real: if a male athlete shows passion, he’s a leader—but when a female athlete does the same, she’s “emotional.” When male commentators analyze men’s performance, they focus on strength, strategy, and skill. But when it’s women on the field, the talk often turns to appearance, outfits, or even their personal lives. Why is Serena Williams discussed for her body while Novak Djokovic is praised for his backhand?


And it’s not just about the athletes. Women in the commentary booth face a double standard too. Many have to work twice as hard to prove they belong. If a male commentator makes a mistake, it's brushed off. But if a woman stumbles—even slightly—critics flood social media questioning her "credentials." It’s not uncommon to hear that she was “only hired for diversity” or “doesn’t understand the game,” despite often having more experience or formal training than her male counterparts.


The issue isn’t just frustrating—it’s harmful. It reinforces the idea that women are outsiders in the world of sports, both on the field and behind the mic. And when millions are listening, that message can shape attitudes for generations.


But here’s the flip side: change is happening, and it's loud. More women are claiming their space in sports media—bringing not only insight and professionalism, but also challenging the outdated norms with every word they speak. Audiences are also becoming more aware, calling out sexist remarks and demanding better representation.


Still, one question remains: If sports are about merit, fairness, and respect—shouldn't the commentary reflect that too?


Sexism in sports commentary isn’t just a bad habit. It’s a foul play that needs a red card.

This piece is strong, timely, and powerful. To make it even more impactful and publication-ready (for a blog, op-ed, or magazine feature), here’s a slightly polished version with tightened phrasing, more rhythm, and an even stronger closing punch:

---

The Unseen Foul That Keeps Happening On-Air​

When we tune in to watch a match, we expect sharp analysis, excitement, and maybe even a touch of humor.
What we don’t expect—but too often hear—is something far uglier: sexism in sports commentary.


Despite the incredible strides women have made across all levels of sport—from grassroots to global championships—the commentary box still echoes with outdated attitudes and subtle, sometimes blatant, gender bias.


Let’s be honest:
If a male athlete shows passion, he’s “fired up” or “a leader.”
If a female athlete does the same? She’s “overly emotional.”


When men play, the focus is on tactics, skill, and athleticism.
When women play, the spotlight too often drifts toward appearance, personal lives, or wardrobe choices.
Why is Serena Williams discussed for her body, while Novak Djokovic is dissected for his backhand?


And it doesn’t stop with the athletes.


Women in the commentary booth face a different game entirely.
A male commentator can fumble a stat and move on.
But when a woman misspeaks—or simply offers a strong opinion—she’s instantly questioned:
“Is she qualified?”
“Was she hired just to tick a box?”
Even with years of experience or formal training, she must constantly re-earn legitimacy in a space that should have welcomed her from day one.


This isn’t just frustrating—it’s harmful.
Because sports commentary doesn’t just describe the game. It shapes how we see it.
When sexism goes unchecked in broadcasting, it tells millions of viewers—especially young girls—that sports are still a boys’ club.
It signals that women, even at the top of their game, will always be judged differently.


But here’s the good news: the tide is turning.
More women are breaking barriers in sports media—not just participating, but leading.
They bring intelligence, authority, and fresh perspective, often while confronting twice the criticism with half the credit.


And fans are pushing back too. Social media, once a source of toxic backlash, is now a place where many are calling out biased commentary and demanding change.


Still, one question lingers:
If sports are built on fairness, merit, and respect—shouldn’t the people calling the game reflect those same values?


Sexism in sports commentary isn’t just a bad habit.
It’s a foul play that deserves a red card.
And this time, the whole world is watching.