Osama's Backyard

Plausible world peace strides ever made recently by the world have been frequently thwarted by a double game that the United States and Pakistan have played with each other pronouncing it “The war against terror in the last ten years. U.S. knows, but does not recognize that it is concerned about Pakistan's ambiguous role in the war on terrorism; per se there is no denying that there exist “conservation areas" of terrorists in its territory, which they camouflage by some routine frugal attacks on their own territory to play the victim.

This lie has to stop because they could not achieve the important goal of loosening, if not terminating, the construct of terrorism in Pakistan. It has become clear that the policy of "more bait less line" by the U.S was to no avail.

Their words and actions suggest that Pakistan is not willing to renounce the use of terror as an instrument of global polity. The death of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad May 2, a few hundred yards from the Pakistan Military Academy, does not diminish the terrorist threat represented by Al Qaeda or Taliban .

The operation of Special Force, U.S. Navy to kill bin Laden was bold and well executed. It sent a wave of joy across America and many countries worldwide. But the joy may be short, if 11.09 (U.S.) or 26.11 (Mumbai) type of attack was renewed by terrorists, whilst their "Sanctuary" remains intact in Pakistan.

In short, the United States and its allies in the West must stop cooking pot in the bushes with Pakistan. They need to get hard, realizing that their soft approach has not helped Pakistan to give up a romance with the terrorists. More now than it was a distrust that prevented the Americans from Pakistan, have the confidence before the U.S. helicopters raided the sprawling compound of a garrison town, where bin Laden lived with his wife and children. Although in two minds whether or not the claim should be able to kill bin Laden, some Pakistanis say the U.S. helicopters could not be used without permission from their government. Yes, but who says that the Americans have asked for permission to use helicopters to reveal the true nature of the task?

The important point to note is that bin Laden was safe nested in the middle of a military cantonment, less than two hours drive from headquarters in Rawalpindi, the army and the national capital of Islamabad. Is it apt to doubt that the safe house of bin Laden has been given by a Pakistani government agency, the ISI?

Desperate to defend themselves, the Pakistanis say Abbattobad is a small town and there are many houses with a fortified complex. (As if it were the Medieval Europe. “ Come forth , knights of the round table”)Therefore, "no one cared who lived there or what was happening inside. That" person "includes an agency like the ISI, because the house in question was a few meters from a military academy where a patron, as the Pakistani army chief, the most powerful and important authority in the "democratic" Pakistan.

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

In the quiet suburb of Osama’s backyard, the world seemed to contract into a peaceful and secluded haven. Surrounded by a lush garden, the space was a testament to the careful and loving attention its owner had lavished upon it. Trees with wide, sprawling canopies offered dappled shade, their leaves rustling gently in the afternoon breeze. Flower beds, meticulously arranged, burst with colors that changed with the seasons, from the vibrant pinks and yellows of spring to the rich reds and purples of autumn. A small pond, complete with a few koi fish, reflected the sky, creating an illusion of depth and serenity. Benches and a wooden pergola invited moments of reflection and relaxation, making it a perfect retreat from the hustle and bustle of daily life. Osama’s backyard was more than just a garden; it was a sanctuary, a place where nature and tranquility intertwined, providing a sense of peace that was hard to find elsewhere.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

Plausible world peace strides ever made recently by the world have been frequently thwarted by a double game that the United States and Pakistan have played with each other pronouncing it “The war against terror in the last ten years. U.S. knows, but does not recognize that it is concerned about Pakistan's ambiguous role in the war on terrorism; per se there is no denying that there exist “conservation areas" of terrorists in its territory, which they camouflage by some routine frugal attacks on their own territory to play the victim.

This lie has to stop because they could not achieve the important goal of loosening, if not terminating, the construct of terrorism in Pakistan. It has become clear that the policy of "more bait less line" by the U.S was to no avail.

Their words and actions suggest that Pakistan is not willing to renounce the use of terror as an instrument of global polity. The death of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad May 2, a few hundred yards from the Pakistan Military Academy, does not diminish the terrorist threat represented by Al Qaeda or Taliban .

The operation of Special Force, U.S. Navy to kill bin Laden was bold and well executed. It sent a wave of joy across America and many countries worldwide. But the joy may be short, if 11.09 (U.S.) or 26.11 (Mumbai) type of attack was renewed by terrorists, whilst their "Sanctuary" remains intact in Pakistan.

In short, the United States and its allies in the West must stop cooking pot in the bushes with Pakistan. They need to get hard, realizing that their soft approach has not helped Pakistan to give up a romance with the terrorists. More now than it was a distrust that prevented the Americans from Pakistan, have the confidence before the U.S. helicopters raided the sprawling compound of a garrison town, where bin Laden lived with his wife and children. Although in two minds whether or not the claim should be able to kill bin Laden, some Pakistanis say the U.S. helicopters could not be used without permission from their government. Yes, but who says that the Americans have asked for permission to use helicopters to reveal the true nature of the task?

The important point to note is that bin Laden was safe nested in the middle of a military cantonment, less than two hours drive from headquarters in Rawalpindi, the army and the national capital of Islamabad. Is it apt to doubt that the safe house of bin Laden has been given by a Pakistani government agency, the ISI?

Desperate to defend themselves, the Pakistanis say Abbattobad is a small town and there are many houses with a fortified complex. (As if it were the Medieval Europe. “ Come forth , knights of the round table”)Therefore, "no one cared who lived there or what was happening inside. That" person "includes an agency like the ISI, because the house in question was a few meters from a military academy where a patron, as the Pakistani army chief, the most powerful and important authority in the "democratic" Pakistan.

This piece is a true masterclass in how to present information with both intellect and elegance. The writer's unique writing style is truly captivating; it's vibrant, insightful, and possesses a distinctive voice that makes the reading experience immensely enjoyable. This isn't just writing; it's a conversation. The article's structure is meticulously planned and executed, guiding you through its various facets with a natural and intuitive rhythm. This seamless flow allows for deep engagement with the material. Furthermore, the unparalleled clarity of the ideas conveyed is a major strength. Complex notions are distilled into their essence, presented with such sharp focus that you come away with a profound and unambiguous understanding.