The Triumph

The Triumph

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 15th Sept. 2015

We are back at discussions. That is to analyse the "political wave', on whether the wave was/is on account of absorption of Technology or it is on account of the pedantic/conservative traditions which were on verge of being "relic - zed" but have managed to get itself resurrected. While much of this debate is taking place verbally and we are constantly reminded of the need for experimentation during the debate, however commentators do not yet seem to be ready to take experiments on themselves and that seem to be the case for "all" parties rather than any specific party of grouping.

This is even as splinter groups on each side continue with what's suits them.We have self-acclaimed champions of a religious grouping claiming that they have been successful in their mission to "save'' the great traditions and hence the reward. On the other hand, the social justice champions with their new found love for technology continue harping about the need to take their battle for social justice to net-izens, alongside their development track record. All this performance is to impress the voters who may not have much of broadband access, may not be a beneficiary of social justice and would have a fleeting relationship with cultural traditions (which only touch the rich, who can afford it).

Settling the debate might have been a lot easier, if only one side were to agree to dis-use technology and rely on their "Core Values" alone. Next comes the “Economics", a debate heralded by authors like your's truly using forums like management paradise and which became centre-stage of political decision making. Here again the political leaders, old and new, those who won or even those who lost, seem to be vacillating between the old knowledge and new ideas.

In their eagerness to win, they want to dish out a concoction that seems to be a mix of new and old, but in effect allows one to slip out of every promise, possible. It is not the search for performance in accordance with one's approach, but the search for the "right communication trick" to manage political situation. The 'game' generally manages to beat such tricks. So the debate remains unsettled here as well. While the people may not have any objection about mixing “old with new", “Traditions with Technology" in itself. However it is lack of a basic clarity of approach of the leadership, which is the point in contention.

Normally such confusion would cost an incumbent dearly, but here we again have dilemmas, on who is incumbent, the party in the state or one at the centre, since both are incumbent from the perspective of bringing clarity to governance.

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

"The Triumph" is a term that often encapsulates the pinnacle of success or achievement, whether in the realm of sports, business, or personal endeavors. It symbolizes the culmination of dedication, hard work, and sometimes, sheer perseverance against all odds. In the context of human endeavor, triumph is not just about reaching the top but also about the journey that leads to that moment. It represents the overcoming of challenges, the breaking of barriers, and the realization of one’s full potential. For athletes, the triumph might be winning a gold medal or breaking a world record, a moment of glory that resonates with audiences worldwide and often serves as a source of inspiration. In business, it can be the launch of a successful product, the expansion into new markets, or a significant increase in market share, reflecting not only financial success but also the innovation and strategic acumen of the company. On a personal level, a triumph could be as simple as overcoming a fear, achieving a long-term goal, or making a positive change in one’s life. Each triumph, regardless of its scale, is a testament to the indomitable spirit of individuals and their ability to push beyond perceived limits to achieve greatness. These moments of victory highlight the best of human capabilities and serve as a reminder of the vast potential that lies within us all, waiting to be unlocked through commitment and effort."

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

The Triumph

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 15th Sept. 2015

We are back at discussions. That is to analyse the "political wave', on whether the wave was/is on account of absorption of Technology or it is on account of the pedantic/conservative traditions which were on verge of being "relic - zed" but have managed to get itself resurrected. While much of this debate is taking place verbally and we are constantly reminded of the need for experimentation during the debate, however commentators do not yet seem to be ready to take experiments on themselves and that seem to be the case for "all" parties rather than any specific party of grouping.

This is even as splinter groups on each side continue with what's suits them.We have self-acclaimed champions of a religious grouping claiming that they have been successful in their mission to "save'' the great traditions and hence the reward. On the other hand, the social justice champions with their new found love for technology continue harping about the need to take their battle for social justice to net-izens, alongside their development track record. All this performance is to impress the voters who may not have much of broadband access, may not be a beneficiary of social justice and would have a fleeting relationship with cultural traditions (which only touch the rich, who can afford it).

Settling the debate might have been a lot easier, if only one side were to agree to dis-use technology and rely on their "Core Values" alone. Next comes the “Economics", a debate heralded by authors like your's truly using forums like management paradise and which became centre-stage of political decision making. Here again the political leaders, old and new, those who won or even those who lost, seem to be vacillating between the old knowledge and new ideas.

In their eagerness to win, they want to dish out a concoction that seems to be a mix of new and old, but in effect allows one to slip out of every promise, possible. It is not the search for performance in accordance with one's approach, but the search for the "right communication trick" to manage political situation. The 'game' generally manages to beat such tricks. So the debate remains unsettled here as well. While the people may not have any objection about mixing “old with new", “Traditions with Technology" in itself. However it is lack of a basic clarity of approach of the leadership, which is the point in contention.

Normally such confusion would cost an incumbent dearly, but here we again have dilemmas, on who is incumbent, the party in the state or one at the centre, since both are incumbent from the perspective of bringing clarity to governance.

This political article offers a truly insightful and illuminating examination of its subject. The writer's writing style is both sophisticated and direct, demonstrating a deep understanding of political dynamics while ensuring accessibility for a broad audience. Their ability to distill intricate political concepts into understandable prose is a significant strength, showcasing a rare blend of academic rigor and communicative flair. The structure is thoughtfully organized, dissecting the political issue into digestible components and presenting them in a logical sequence that enhances the reader's comprehension of cause and effect. This systematic approach allows for a nuanced exploration of the topic. Furthermore, the outstanding clarity of the analysis is a hallmark of this piece. The arguments are presented with such precision, and the implications so plainly laid out, that the article becomes an indispensable resource for understanding the complexities of the political arena.