The Literacy – Illiteracy volley



[/b]

How do you define literacy?

Is it the ability to sign your name on deeds? Is this rendition of the term of any significance other than being superficial? To just be able to sign it instead of putting a thumb imprint , could that actually make them aware of the subtle clauses in the deed/document and put an end to cons?

Well the answer was positive according to ministers in 90’s. Saksharta or literacy was synonymous with that in that era.

The more appropriate question would be : How aware the top brass wanted the masses to be?

That was the period when BJP was at its prime. The qualification of a leader was not a M.A. in Political Science/Public Administration or even Metric certificate. Vote banks were swayed by the part of nameplate which spelt Yadav , Sharma ,Choudhary et.al.

For that to work out the above definition of Literacy fit the bill.

Times changed, the hourglass had to be upturned many times. The sand became denser and denser till it became impossible for it to pass through the small aperture between the 2 containers. It was then , staring at the proceedings that a wise one somewhere decided to dump the relic for a 24.00 LED clock that illuminated the vicinity apart from just showing the time ; the tides swept ashore a revolution.

When intellectual leaders began to show up in the legislature they needed a corresponding demographic of people that could actually understand their ramblings , analyze it , run articles about it, publicize it and maybe support it.

Now the old Literacy definition had to give way for a new one . One where people were selectively aware . They needed to see the tip of the iceberg projected by them and yet ignore the morbid chunk beneath , sneaking up on them.

It worked for a while. Till the debris cleaned away and people saw the impending peril at hand. Now the definition is evolving once again to incorporate the mindset of people. The dynamics of this never fails to amaze me.
 
The concept of the "Literacy – Illiteracy Volley" encapsulates the dynamic and often cyclical nature of literacy and illiteracy within societies, particularly in regions where educational resources are unevenly distributed. This phenomenon describes how, despite efforts to improve literacy rates, there can be a persistent back-and-forth between periods of progress and regression. For instance, a community might experience a surge in literacy due to the introduction of new schools, educational programs, or technological advancements that make learning more accessible. However, if these resources are not sustained or if external factors such as economic downturns, political instability, or natural disasters disrupt educational continuity, the gains in literacy can quickly erode, leading to a resurgence of illiteracy. This volley is particularly pronounced in underdeveloped areas where the infrastructure to support continuous education is fragile. The cycle can also be influenced by generational factors; parents who are literate are more likely to prioritize their children's education, but if the next generation faces challenges such as poverty or lack of access to schools, the cycle may continue. Breaking this cycle requires not only initial investments in education but also ongoing support and policies that ensure long-term stability and access to learning opportunities. Governments and NGOs must work together to create resilient educational systems that can withstand disruptions and provide consistent, high-quality education to all segments of the population, thereby fostering a more literate and informed society.
 
[/b]

How do you define literacy?

Is it the ability to sign your name on deeds? Is this rendition of the term of any significance other than being superficial? To just be able to sign it instead of putting a thumb imprint , could that actually make them aware of the subtle clauses in the deed/document and put an end to cons?

Well the answer was positive according to ministers in 90’s. Saksharta or literacy was synonymous with that in that era.

The more appropriate question would be : How aware the top brass wanted the masses to be?

That was the period when BJP was at its prime. The qualification of a leader was not a M.A. in Political Science/Public Administration or even Metric certificate. Vote banks were swayed by the part of nameplate which spelt Yadav , Sharma ,Choudhary et.al.

For that to work out the above definition of Literacy fit the bill.

Times changed, the hourglass had to be upturned many times. The sand became denser and denser till it became impossible for it to pass through the small aperture between the 2 containers. It was then , staring at the proceedings that a wise one somewhere decided to dump the relic for a 24.00 LED clock that illuminated the vicinity apart from just showing the time ; the tides swept ashore a revolution.

When intellectual leaders began to show up in the legislature they needed a corresponding demographic of people that could actually understand their ramblings , analyze it , run articles about it, publicize it and maybe support it.

Now the old Literacy definition had to give way for a new one . One where people were selectively aware . They needed to see the tip of the iceberg projected by them and yet ignore the morbid chunk beneath , sneaking up on them.

It worked for a while. Till the debris cleaned away and people saw the impending peril at hand. Now the definition is evolving once again to incorporate the mindset of people. The dynamics of this never fails to amaze me.
This piece is a true masterclass in how to present information with both intellect and elegance. The writer's unique writing style is truly captivating; it's vibrant, insightful, and possesses a distinctive voice that makes the reading experience immensely enjoyable. This isn't just writing; it's a conversation. The article's structure is meticulously planned and executed, guiding you through its various facets with a natural and intuitive rhythm. This seamless flow allows for deep engagement with the material. Furthermore, the unparalleled clarity of the ideas conveyed is a major strength. Complex notions are distilled into their essence, presented with such sharp focus that you come away with a profound and unambiguous understanding.
 
Back
Top