The Dark Side of Pharmaceutical Patents: Profits Over People

Screenshot 2025-05-15 192310.png


Intellectual property rights are designed to reward innovation, but in the pharmaceutical industry, they often prioritize profits over public health. Patent protections on life-saving drugs allow pharmaceutical giants to maintain monopolies, charge exorbitant prices, and restrict access to essential medicines — especially in the Global South. This sharp imbalance in the IP system is not just an ethical failure; it's a humanitarian crisis.

Under the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), member nations must grant 20-year patents on pharmaceuticals. This policy, while intended to incentivize research, effectively blocks generic competition and keeps drug prices artificially high for years — sometimes decades.

Real-World Impact: HIV/AIDS in Africa​

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, HIV/AIDS was ravaging sub-Saharan Africa. Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs existed, but they were priced at over $10,000 per patient per year — completely unaffordable in countries like South Africa. Pharmaceutical companies, backed by patent laws, sued the South African government in 1998 for importing generics. Public outrage and global activism forced the companies to drop the case in 2001, highlighting the moral bankruptcy of enforcing IP laws at the expense of lives.

COVID-19 Vaccine: A Missed Opportunity​

The COVID-19 pandemic was another flashpoint. While rich countries vaccinated their populations within months, developing nations waited over a year. India and South Africa proposed a temporary TRIPS waiver to allow low-cost production of vaccines, but it was blocked by the EU, UK, and Switzerland, under pressure from pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna.

Meanwhile, Pfizer earned over $100 billion from its COVID-19 vaccine by 2023 — a glaring example of patent power during a global health emergency. The refusal to share mRNA vaccine technology is widely seen as a failure of global solidarity and a stark reminder that IP protections can obstruct equitable healthcare access.

Patent Monopolies Are Not Always Justified​

Big Pharma argues that patents are essential for recouping research investments. However, much of the foundational research is publicly funded. The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, contributed to the development of the Moderna vaccine. Yet, the benefits flowed disproportionately to private corporations, not the taxpayers or patients.

Conclusion: Reform Is Long Overdue​

The pharmaceutical patent system is broken. It rewards monopoly pricing over medicine access and allows corporations to exploit legal protections for profit maximization. Intellectual property rights must be balanced with public health priorities, especially during global crises. The TRIPS agreement needs urgent reform to include mandatory technology sharing, compulsory licensing provisions, and exceptions for low-income countries.


It’s time to stop letting intellectual property rights become instruments of inequality. Life-saving medicine is not a luxury — it is a human right.
 
Back
Top