The Basics of Capital Budgeting

Description
capital budgeting in economics and also gives steps in capital budgeting. What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive projects. What is the difference between normal and non-normal cash flow streams? What is NPV and IRR, limitations of IRR.

THE BASICS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING
10-1

What is capital budgeting?
? Analysis of potential additions to fixed

assets. ? Long-term decisions; involve large expenditures. ? Very important to firm’s future.

Examples:
? Expansion ? Replacement ? Buy or lease ? Choice of equipment ? Capital expenditure

Problems:
? Demand for capital-how much money

needed for expenditure ? Supply of capital – internal and external ? Capital rationing – selection of the projects

Types of capital
? Debt ? Preference share ? Equity capital ? Retained earnings

WACC: weighted average cost of capital

methods
? Pay back method ? Accounting rate of return ? Internal rate of return ? Net present value

Steps to capital budgeting
Estimate CFs (inflows & outflows). 2. Assess riskiness of CFs. 3. Determine the appropriate cost of capital. 4. Find NPV and/or IRR. 5. Accept if NPV > 0 and/or IRR > WACC.
1.

What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive projects?
? Independent projects – if the cash flows of one are unaffected by the acceptance of the other. ? Mutually exclusive projects – if the cash flows

of one can be adversely impacted by the acceptance of the other.

What is the difference between normal and nonnormal cash flow streams?
? Normal cash flow stream – Cost (negative CF) followed by a series of positive cash inflows. One change of signs. ? Nonnormal cash flow stream – Two or more

changes of signs. Most common: Cost (negative CF), then string of positive CFs, then cost to close project. Nuclear power plant, strip mine, etc.

What is the payback period?
? The number of years required to recover a

project’s cost, or “How long does it take to get our money back?” ? Calculated by adding project’s cash inflows to its cost until the cumulative cash flow for the project turns positive.

Calculating payback
Project L
CFt Cumulative
0
-100 -100

1
10 -90

2
60 -30

2.4
100 0

3

80
50

PaybackL
Project S CFt Cumulative PaybackS

= 2 =
0 -100 -100

+
1

30 / 80 1.6
2

= 2.375 years
3 20 40

70 -30

100 50 0 20

= 1 =

+

30 / 50

= 1.6 years

Strengths and weaknesses of payback
? Strengths
? Provides an indication of a project’s risk and

liquidity. ? Easy to calculate and understand.

? Weaknesses
? Ignores the time value of money.
? Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period.

Discounted payback period
? Uses discounted cash flows rather than raw

CFs.
0 CFt PV of CFt Cumulative -100 -100 -100 2 +
10%

1 10 9.09 -90.91

2 60 49.59 -41.32

2.7 3
80 60.11 18.79 = 2.7 years

Disc PaybackL = =

41.32 / 60.11

Accounting rate of return
? = estimated net profits/ capital employed .

100 ? Average investment =( initial investment + scrap value) / 2 ? Limitation : does not look at time value of money

Net Present Value (NPV)
? Sum of the PVs of all cash inflows and outflows of a project:

CFt NPV ? ? t t ?0 ( 1 ? k )
n

What is Project L’s NPV?
Year 0 1 2 3 CFt -100 10 60 80 NPVL = PV of CFt -$100 9.09 49.59 60.11 $18.79

NPVS = $19.98

Rationale for the NPV method
= PV of inflows – Cost = Net gain in wealth ? If projects are independent, accept if the project NPV > 0. ? If projects are mutually exclusive, accept projects with the highest positive NPV, those that add the most value. ? In this example, would accept S if mutually exclusive (NPVs > NPVL), and would accept both if independent. NPV

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
? IRR is the discount rate that forces PV of inflows equal to cost, and the NPV = 0:

CFt 0?? ( 1 ? IRR ) t t ?0
n

Normally NPV METHOD and IRR method gives the same result

How is a project’s IRR similar to a bond’s YTM?
? They are the same thing. ? Think of a bond as a project. The YTM on

the bond would be the IRR of the “bond” project. ? EXAMPLE: Suppose a 10-year bond with a 9% annual coupon sells for $1,134.20.
? Solve for IRR = YTM = 7.08%, the annual return

for this project/bond.

Rationale for the IRR method
? If IRR > WACC, the project’s rate of return

is greater than its costs. There is some return left over to boost stockholders’ returns.

IRR Acceptance Criteria
? If IRR > k, accept project. ? If IRR < k, reject project. ? If projects are independent, accept both

projects, as both IRR > k = 10%. ? If projects are mutually exclusive, accept S, because IRRs > IRRL.

NPV Profiles
? A graphical representation of project NPVs at various different costs of capital.

k 0 5 10 15 20

NPVL $50 33 19 7 (4)

NPVS $40 29 20 12 5

Comparing the NPV and IRR methods
? If projects are independent, the two methods always lead to the same accept/reject decisions. ? IRR's major limitation is also its greatest

strength: it uses one single discount rate to evaluate every investment. Without modification, IRR does not account for changing discount rates, so it's just not adequate for longer-term projects with discount rates that are expected to vary.

Comparisons :
proposals Initial inv Annual cash flow Life in years

1
2 3 4 5

60,000
88,000 2150 20,500 4,25,000

12000
22,500 1,500 4500 2,25000

15
22 3 10 20

Pay back method
Pay back period = Initial investment/annual cash flow
5 3.9 1.4 4.6 1.9

1 2 3 4 5

60,000/12,000 88,00/22500 21,50/1500 2,5000/4500 4,25000/2,25000

Accounting rate
proposal Initial Annual Life in investme cash flow years nt Annual deprecia tion Net profits Rate of return

1

60,000

12000

15

4000

8000

26.67

2
3 4 5

88,000
2150 20,500 4,25000

22,500
1500 4500 2,25000

22
3 10 20

4000
717 2050 21,250

18,500
783 2450 203750

42
72.84 23.9 95.88

NPV
proposal 1 2 3 4 Initial inv 60,000 88,000 2150 20,500 Annual cash low 12,000 22,500 1500 4500 life 15 22 3 10 Pv(10%) 7.7688 8.8919 2.5918 6.3213 Pv 93225.6 npvi 1.55

200,067.7 2.27 5 3887.7 28445.8 1.81 1.39

5

425,000 2,25000

20

8.6466

1945485

4.56

DCF
? Discounted cash flows or internal rate of

return may sometimes give different results

? All methods do not give the same interpretation
methods
Proposal 1 2 3

payback
rank 5 3 1

accountin g
ranks 4 3 2

DCF
ranks 4 3 2

NPV
ranks 4 2 3

4
5

4
2

5
1

5
1

5
1



doc_579613465.pptx
 

Attachments

Back
Top