The ‘Game’ and the Electoral Outcome

The ‘Game’ and the Electoral Outcome​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 19th May 2019

So it’s going to be a ‘new realization’ for the ‘commercial news media’. That even after all the ‘scheming’, the result was as per forecast (read http://www.managementparadise.com/article/9742/the-prophecy-of-the-game ) . The readers of these articles know that “the prophecy (of Game)” itself was out (with its forecast) more than an year back, and stands out ahead of all the poll-pundits with present electoral results, broadly in line. But the Netas would continue with their own broadside (to confuse the Game public), in the era of the ‘Game. This happens mainly because they know that ‘the tail (of the commercial news media) would continue to wag for the master’ than anyone else. Therefore the shit would continue to be poured around the condition of the loo in sarkari banks rather than real issues, like overall situation and also lack of flow credit to sectors and businesses which are deserving. And all assurances would be given to the Netas that the can sleep in comfort over the issues like absent edu-care, healthcare, jobs, sanitation, water etc. and continue to focus on ever-larger infra to appease their ‘core supporters’. When public is ignored it makes politics much more difficult for the Netas. But the commercial news media continues to assure them to formulate ever new political and economic schemes by formulating new coalitions and other similar stuff to hold on to crutches of power. An erstwhile party’s continued slide towards towards oblivion, notwithstanding and rendered meaningless in spite of all the hulla-boo. Quite a few political ideologies have cracked and Netas have taken to bust their own balloons freely as depicted by the jumping jack Netas, which should tell everyone about what’s the ‘ruling ideology’, but no one wants to admit it of course.

While the political roller-coaster continues as the prophecy and its ‘right forecasts’ become passe, let’s focus on ‘what’s next’. The electoral outcome would lead to formation of some government with a coalition that would come to place is already known and has nothing new for the readers of these article. What the readers of this articles expect is much more. The significance of this elections is also more than just formation of the government. It signals which states are ‘ripe’ for political change and parties/coalitions having right positioning as of now. The vulnerability of the so called national parties is exposed and this is a sudden contrast from last election when a national party went around not only making a sweep, but also continuance of its vijayrath over a host of states, thereafter. The message may be to continue to let institutions like the judiciary become much more stronger, letting external security agencies play their role in an institutionalized manner rather political muck-raking and improve focus of the Executive (& Netas) on service delivery (to people) rather deal-making with business and this be done is a rather challenging polity, now. Otherwise, one can always look at the retiring and nearly retired Netas for inspiration and guidance. What the ‘Game’ may not be sure is if leads to performing and stronger institutions as there may be enough servile bureaucrats with focus on Netadom rather than focus on the message from public at large so much so that this training seems to be absent from the training curriculums of these bureaucrats.

Then we have this message of declining stature of the National Parties with Netas of these parties refusing to focus on state units. The importance of state leadership having strong acceptance within a state is not understood even when erstwhile CMs being rated more capable than the National Ministers now. This trend is likely to continue and the Bengal elections (kiski sarkar) that would decide the fate, but this would only be as much as that in the largest state (which is anticipated to be mixed bag). This would also set the stage for putting much more focus on individual state/s as getting a positive vote in state is somewhat more possible that getting a landslide positive vote at the National level. And basis state by state performance one can then expect some political magic of a single party majority, then. The election results is back-drop of ‘absolute stupidity’ in neighborhood and its adept response should be an eye opener, other- wise which the mandate would have been even more fragmented, but of course the media and Netas would want to believe differently.

It may be noted that now the ‘state rounds’ would be a bit different from the earlier more predictable electoral path. The smaller parties and free/individual Netas in the states, being wiser with publicity of the Prophecy would have all the power to make their impact and would receive response from the public. They would need to start their positioning from much earlier and be more sincere towards their ideological leanings and political deal cracking, though. The Netas in these parties would also benefit from the understanding of the behavior of different news media as well. What this implies is that the party/Netas in power in states as well as Nets in opposition would have a challenging task at hand just as the current Netas in the Center had in spite of their own (seasoned) calculation of a near walk-over. These Netas of small parties would also benefit from the ‘record’ and ‘sincerity (or the lack of it)’ of the national and state parties (in power) on public concern areas as mentioned above. And the Agri and rural concerns brushed aside under the carpet over and over again are a political limelight now irrespective of the commercial news media with its metro/city focus remaining oblivious to the same. They can make or break any political fortunes whatsoever, as depicted/to be depicted as the Prophecy of the Game with its forecast ‘sees’ the light. Nevertheless, the ‘Game’ continues to evolve as we move towards the ‘Third Flush’. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

Okay, let's explore the concept of "the game" and its impact on electoral outcomes. Here's an article diving into that topic:

The 'Game' and the Electoral Outcome: How Strategy and Tactics Shape Political Victories

The familiar adage that politics is a game isn’t just a catchy phrase; it reflects a fundamental truth about the electoral process. While voters ultimately decide the outcome, the strategies, tactics, and maneuvers employed by campaigns often hold as much sway as policy platforms and charismatic candidates. Understanding this “game” is crucial to deciphering the complexities of electoral results.

Beyond Ideas: The Rules of Engagement

The political game is governed by a complex set of unspoken rules and accepted practices. These go far beyond the formal framework of election laws. They encompass:

• Framing the Narrative: Campaigns don't simply present facts; they craft narratives designed to resonate with specific demographics and shape public perception. This includes choosing which issues to elevate, defining opponents, and setting the tone of the campaign.
• Targeting Voters: Elections are not won by converting everyone; they are won by mobilizing key voting blocs. This requires sophisticated data analysis, nuanced understanding of voter behavior, and tailored messaging.
• Resource Management: Money, time, and volunteer power are finite. Effective campaigns allocate these resources strategically, focusing on areas where they can make the most impact.
• Media Manipulation: In today's media landscape, controlling the narrative online and in the traditional press is crucial. This involves crafting soundbites, managing controversies, and strategically leaking information.
• Playing Defense and Offense: Campaigns are often engaged in a continuous back-and-forth, responding to attacks while simultaneously launching their own. This requires quick thinking, adaptability, and a strong communication strategy.

The Players and Their Moves

The political "game" involves a cast of key players:

• The Candidates: They are the face of the campaign, responsible for connecting with voters and executing the overall strategy.
• Campaign Managers: They are the strategists, overseeing the entire operation and ensuring each element works in unison.
• Pollsters and Data Analysts: They provide the insights that drive strategy, identifying voter trends and pinpointing areas for focus.
• Communication Specialists: They craft the messaging, manage media relations, and ensure the campaign's narrative is consistent.
• Fundraisers: They secure the financial resources needed to operate the campaign.
• Volunteers: They are the ground troops, mobilizing voters and spreading the word.

Each of these players contributes to the overall strategy, making calculated moves that can influence the outcome.

How the 'Game' Influences Results

The "game" isn't just about clever tactics; it can profoundly affect electoral outcomes in several ways:

• Mobilizing the Base: By energizing their core supporters, campaigns can ensure high turnout, which can be decisive, particularly in close elections.
• Persuading the Undecided: Swing voters are often the target of intense campaigning. Framing issues and appealing to their values can sway their decisions.
• Demobilizing the Opposition: Negative campaigning and strategically timed attacks can discourage opponent's voters from participating.
• Creating Momentum: Successful campaigns often build momentum, and those perceived as winning are more likely to attract support.

The Ethical Concerns

While strategy is an inherent part of electoral politics, the "game" raises ethical questions. Tactics that manipulate information, sow division, or discourage participation can undermine the democratic process. The line between shrewd campaigning and outright manipulation can sometimes be blurred, placing additional importance on the need for informed voters and accountable campaigns.

Beyond the Surface:

Understanding the "game" allows us to see beyond the surface of political campaigns. It helps us to be more critical consumers of political information and appreciate the complex dance between candidates, campaigns, and voters. By recognizing the strategic maneuvers that influence elections, we become better equipped to analyze outcomes and participate meaningfully in the democratic process.

In Conclusion

The electoral process is not simply a battle of ideas; it's a contest of strategy and execution. While policy proposals and candidate charisma are vital, campaigns that grasp the nuances of the "game" – the strategies, tactics, and unspoken rules – are often those that achieve electoral success. By recognizing the importance of this dynamic, citizens can become more informed voters and make decisions that shape the direction of their communities and countries. The future of democracy depends on conscious voters who understand the game and the role they play in it.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

The ‘Game’ and the Electoral Outcome​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 19th May 2019

So it’s going to be a ‘new realization’ for the ‘commercial news media’. That even after all the ‘scheming’, the result was as per forecast (read http://www.managementparadise.com/article/9742/the-prophecy-of-the-game ) . The readers of these articles know that “the prophecy (of Game)” itself was out (with its forecast) more than an year back, and stands out ahead of all the poll-pundits with present electoral results, broadly in line. But the Netas would continue with their own broadside (to confuse the Game public), in the era of the ‘Game. This happens mainly because they know that ‘the tail (of the commercial news media) would continue to wag for the master’ than anyone else. Therefore the shit would continue to be poured around the condition of the loo in sarkari banks rather than real issues, like overall situation and also lack of flow credit to sectors and businesses which are deserving. And all assurances would be given to the Netas that the can sleep in comfort over the issues like absent edu-care, healthcare, jobs, sanitation, water etc. and continue to focus on ever-larger infra to appease their ‘core supporters’. When public is ignored it makes politics much more difficult for the Netas. But the commercial news media continues to assure them to formulate ever new political and economic schemes by formulating new coalitions and other similar stuff to hold on to crutches of power. An erstwhile party’s continued slide towards towards oblivion, notwithstanding and rendered meaningless in spite of all the hulla-boo. Quite a few political ideologies have cracked and Netas have taken to bust their own balloons freely as depicted by the jumping jack Netas, which should tell everyone about what’s the ‘ruling ideology’, but no one wants to admit it of course.

While the political roller-coaster continues as the prophecy and its ‘right forecasts’ become passe, let’s focus on ‘what’s next’. The electoral outcome would lead to formation of some government with a coalition that would come to place is already known and has nothing new for the readers of these article. What the readers of this articles expect is much more. The significance of this elections is also more than just formation of the government. It signals which states are ‘ripe’ for political change and parties/coalitions having right positioning as of now. The vulnerability of the so called national parties is exposed and this is a sudden contrast from last election when a national party went around not only making a sweep, but also continuance of its vijayrath over a host of states, thereafter. The message may be to continue to let institutions like the judiciary become much more stronger, letting external security agencies play their role in an institutionalized manner rather political muck-raking and improve focus of the Executive (& Netas) on service delivery (to people) rather deal-making with business and this be done is a rather challenging polity, now. Otherwise, one can always look at the retiring and nearly retired Netas for inspiration and guidance. What the ‘Game’ may not be sure is if leads to performing and stronger institutions as there may be enough servile bureaucrats with focus on Netadom rather than focus on the message from public at large so much so that this training seems to be absent from the training curriculums of these bureaucrats.

Then we have this message of declining stature of the National Parties with Netas of these parties refusing to focus on state units. The importance of state leadership having strong acceptance within a state is not understood even when erstwhile CMs being rated more capable than the National Ministers now. This trend is likely to continue and the Bengal elections (kiski sarkar) that would decide the fate, but this would only be as much as that in the largest state (which is anticipated to be mixed bag). This would also set the stage for putting much more focus on individual state/s as getting a positive vote in state is somewhat more possible that getting a landslide positive vote at the National level. And basis state by state performance one can then expect some political magic of a single party majority, then. The election results is back-drop of ‘absolute stupidity’ in neighborhood and its adept response should be an eye opener, other- wise which the mandate would have been even more fragmented, but of course the media and Netas would want to believe differently.

It may be noted that now the ‘state rounds’ would be a bit different from the earlier more predictable electoral path. The smaller parties and free/individual Netas in the states, being wiser with publicity of the Prophecy would have all the power to make their impact and would receive response from the public. They would need to start their positioning from much earlier and be more sincere towards their ideological leanings and political deal cracking, though. The Netas in these parties would also benefit from the understanding of the behavior of different news media as well. What this implies is that the party/Netas in power in states as well as Nets in opposition would have a challenging task at hand just as the current Netas in the Center had in spite of their own (seasoned) calculation of a near walk-over. These Netas of small parties would also benefit from the ‘record’ and ‘sincerity (or the lack of it)’ of the national and state parties (in power) on public concern areas as mentioned above. And the Agri and rural concerns brushed aside under the carpet over and over again are a political limelight now irrespective of the commercial news media with its metro/city focus remaining oblivious to the same. They can make or break any political fortunes whatsoever, as depicted/to be depicted as the Prophecy of the Game with its forecast ‘sees’ the light. Nevertheless, the ‘Game’ continues to evolve as we move towards the ‘Third Flush’. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…

This political article is a masterclass in architectural writing, where every element serves to construct a compelling argument. The writer's writing style is both authoritative and exceptionally precise, cutting through the common obfuscation of political discourse to reveal the core issues. There's an intellectual rigor evident in the prose, yet it remains remarkably accessible, guiding the reader through complex ideas without condescension. The structure of the piece is its backbone, meticulously designed to build a logical and unassailable case. Each paragraph and section is placed with strategic intent, creating a seamless flow that naturally leads to a profound understanding of the political landscape being discussed. Crucially, the unwavering clarity of the analysis is the article's greatest strength; every nuance of policy and every facet of political strategy are laid bare with such lucidity that the implications are undeniable and instantly graspable, making it an invaluable resource for informed citizens.