In the high-stakes world of professional sports, one ugly truth has become impossible to ignore: tanking — the intentional losing of games to secure higher draft picks. It’s become the worst-kept secret in leagues like the NBA and NFL. Some call it strategy. Others call it a disgrace to the very spirit of competition.


Let’s be honest — tanking is not just happening; it’s institutionalized. Franchises gut their rosters, bench healthy players, and field lineups that even their own fans struggle to recognize. All for the sake of a 19-year-old prospect who might save the franchise. It’s a gamble, often disguised as a “rebuild.” But who’s really paying the price?


The fans. The ones who pay to see effort, not apathy. The ones who cheer for pride, not percentages. When teams tank, fans are served a product that is deliberately inferior. Imagine buying a concert ticket and the band purposely plays off-key to set up next year’s tour. That’s what tanking is.


But here’s the real kicker: Tanking works. The 76ers tanked for years with their infamous “Process” and came out with stars. The Cleveland Browns did it in the NFL. Suddenly, losing looks smart. But at what ethical cost?


Sport is supposed to be the last place where effort, pride, and merit decide the outcome — not manipulation and draft math. Tanking sends a toxic message: that losing on purpose can be a winning move. It rewards mediocrity and punishes teams that try but fall short.


Should we admire the strategy or condemn the behavior? Maybe it’s time leagues take a hard stance — dock draft picks, implement lotteries that punish blatant tanking, or even fine franchises that insult competition itself.


Because when losing becomes a plan, sports lose their soul.
 
Back
Top