Description
This study entitled “A Study on Employee Absenteeism at X’s Soap Ltd” Is based on to analysis the employee’s absenteeism and reason behind their absenteeism. By using this analysis the company can easily identify the measures to overcome it.
The primary data was collected from 100 samples. On the basis, the secondary data analysis and the extensive analysis of primary data, interpretation where drawn for the conclusion. Certain suggestions are also drawn from the analysis to help X soap to overcome absenteeism.
STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ABSENTEEISM AT X SOAP’s LIMITED
Project report submitted in prti! "u!"i!!ment o" t#e re$uirements "or t#e
%rd o" t#e De&ree Mster o" Business Administrtion
Submitted By
SOU'ASSINI(B
E)ecuti*e summr+
This study entitled “A Study on Employee Absenteeism at X’s Soap Ltd” Is
based on to analysis the employee’s absenteeism and reason behind their
absenteeism. By using this analysis the company can easily identiy the measures
to o!ercome it.
The primary data "as collected rom #$$ samples. %n the basis& the
secondary data analysis and the e'tensi!e analysis o primary data& interpretation
"here dra"n or the conclusion. (ertain suggestions are also dra"n rom the
analysis to help X soap to o!ercome absenteeism.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,-APTE. NO/ TITLE PA'E NO/
I(
I)T*%+,(TI%) #
II(
I)+,ST*- A)+ (%./A)- /*%0ILE 123
III(
*E4IE5 %0 LIT*AT,*E 621$
I0(
*ESEA*(7 .E+7%+%L%8- 1#219
0(
+ATA A)AL-SIS A)+ I)TE*/*ETATI%) 132##$
0I(
0I)+I)8S A)+ (%)L,SI%) ###2##:
LIST O1 TABLES
TABLE NO/ NAMES O1 TABLE PA'E NO/
:.# 8E)+E* 13
:.1 A8E 16
:.; E+,(ATI%)AL %4E* ALL 5%*? EX/E*IE)(E ;$
:.: -EA*S %0 EX/E*IE)(E ;#
:.9 +A-S %0 /*ESE)T ;1
:.3 +A-S %0 LEA4E ;;
:.6 *EAS%) 0%* ABSE)TEEIS. ;>
:.= A++ITI%)AL LEA4E ;9
:.#$ ABSE)TEEIS. E00E(T %) %,T /,T ;3
:.## SALA*- ;6
:.#1 SATIS0A(TI%) LE4EL ;=
:.#; ,)+E*STA)+I)8 T%5A*+S 5%*?@A%B
*ES/%)SIBILIT-
>#
:.#> E./L%-EE’S SATIS0A(TI%) >1
:.#: E./L%-EE’S *ELATI%)S7I/ >;
:.#9 5%*? E)4I*%).E)T >>
:.#3 X S%A/’s 7EL/ T%5A*+S E./L%-EE’s /E*S%)AL
/*%BLE.
>:
:.#6 ABSE)TEEIS. /%LI(IES >9
:.#= .ET7%+ %0 7A)+LI)8 ABSE)TEEIS. >3
:.1$ 0A(T%*S T7AT .A- *E+,(E ABSE)TEEIS. >6
:.1# ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ 8E)+E* :$
:.11 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ A8E :#
:.1; ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ +ESI8)ATI%) :1
:.1> ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ EX/E*IE)(E I)
T7E (%./A)-
:;
:.1: ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ %4E* ALL
EX/E*IE)(E
:>
:.19 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ E+,(ATI%) ::
:.13 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ SALA*- :9
:.16 (7I2SG
1=2;$ +A-S $6 $6G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
DAYS O1 P.ESENTD ,-A.T E(?
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the number o days an employee is present in a month at X Soap’s
Limited& it sho"s that :>G o them are present rom 19216 days& ollo"ed by 1:G o them
present or 1;21: days& #;G o them or 1$211 days and 6G o them present up to 1=2;$ days.
F( Tot! number o" d+s t#e emp!o+ee t>es !e*e in mont# t X Sop’s Limited(
DAYS O1 LEA0EDTABLE E(F
NUMBE. O1
LEA0ES TA:EN PE.
MONT-
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
#2: +A-S $; $;G
92#$ +A-S :1 :1G
##2#: +A-S ;; ;;G
AB%4E #: +A-S #1 #1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
DAYS O1 LEA0ED,-A.T E(F
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the number o days an employee taBes lea!e in a month at X Soap’s
Limited& the chart sho"s that :1G o the employees taBe lea!e rom 92#$ days in a month
ollo"ed by ;;G rom ##2#: days& #1G abo!e #: days and only ;G taBes lea!e rom #2: days.
G( T#e reson be#ind t#e emp!o+ee’s bsenteeism t X Sop’s Limited(
.EASON 1O. ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(G
.EASON 1O.
ABSENTEEISM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
+%.ESTI(
/*%BLE.S
;: ;:G
7EALT7 /*%BLE.S >; >;G
LA(? %0 I)TE*EST
I) A%B
$# $#G
5%*? $> $>G
E)4I*%).E)T
%T7E* *EAS%)S #3 #3G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
.EASON 1O. ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(G
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents that& rom the total respondents >;G o the employees coated health
problems as the reason or absenteeism ollo"ed by ;:G "ho coated domestic problems&#G
reasoned lacB o interest in Cob& >G reasoned the "orB en!ironment and #3G coated other
reasons as the reason or their absenteeism.
H( Do t#e emp!o+ees need ddition! !e*eI
ADDITIONAL LEA0EDTABLE E(H
NEED O1
ADDITIONAL LEA0E
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
-ES >1 >1G
)% :6 :6G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ADDITIONAL LEA0ED,-A.T E(H
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart it can be seen that& the respondent’s response to"ards additional lea!e.
:6G o the employees preer more additional lea!e and >1G o them dose not preer additional
lea!e at X Soap’s Limited.
96( Does t#e bsenteeism o" t#e emp!o+ees ""ect t#e output t X Sop’s LimitedI
ABSENTEEISM E11E,T ON OUT PUTDTABLE E(96
ABSENTEEISM’s
E11E,T ON OUTPUT
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
AL5A-S $$ $$G
S%.ETI.ES 11 11G
)E4E* 36 36G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ABSENTEEISM E11E,T ON OUT PUTD,-A.T E(96
In"erenceL
0orm the abo!e chart& it is inerred that rom the total respondents 36G o the employees
responded that their absenteeism "ill not ha!e eect on the output o the company and 11G o
them responded that sometimes their absenteeism may aect the output at X Soap’s Limited.
99( Are t#e emp!o+ees stis"ied %it# t#e s!r+ pro*ided b+ X Sop’s LimitedI
SALA.YDTABLE E(99
SALA.Y P.O0IDED
BY T-E ,OMPANY
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
S,00I(IE)T :3 :3G
I)S,00I(IE)T >; >;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
SALA.YD,-A.T E(99
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart& it can be inerred that rom the total respondents :3G o the employees at
X Soap’s Limited are satisied "ith the salary pro!ided to them and >;G o the employees are
not satisied "ith the salary pacBage.
98( T#e emp!o+ees stis"ied to%rds t#e compenstion o""ered b+ X Sop’s Limited
durin& t#eir time o" !e*eI
SATIS1A,TION LE0ELDTABLE E(98
SATIS1A,TION
LE0ELON T-E
,OMPENSATION
PAID
NUMBE. O1 .ESPONDENTS PE.,ENTA'E
7I87L-2SATIS0IE+ 1> 1>G
SATIS0IE+ ;: ;:G
)E,T*AL 1= 1=G
+IS2SATIS0IE+ #1 #1G
7I87L-2+IS2
SATIS0IE+
$$ $$G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
SATIS1A,TION LE0ELD,-A.T E(98
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s response to"ards the compensation paid by the
company at the time o lea!e taBen. It sho"s that 1=G o the employees are highly satisied "ith
the compensation paid& ;:G o the employees are satisied& 1=G o the employees ha!e
responded neutral and #1G o the employees are dis2satisied "ith the compensation at X Soap’s
Limited.
95( T#e emp!o+ee’s understndin&s to%rds t#eir %or>=job responsibi!ities t X Sop’s
Limited(
UNDE.STANDIN' TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB .ESPONSIBILITYDTABLE E(95
UNDE.STANDIN'
TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB
NUMBE. O1 .ESPONDENTS PE.,ENTA'E
4E*- (LEA* 36 36G
)ET,*AL 11 11G
)%T (LEA* $$ $$G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
UNDE.STANDIN' TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB .ESPONSIBILITYD,-A.T E(95
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s understanding to"ards "orB@Cob responsibility at X
Soap’s Limited. 36G o the employees are !ery clear about their "orB@Cob and 11G o them are
neutral.
9=G are not satisied.
9E( T#e emp!o+ee’s re!tions#ip to%rds superior=coD%or>er t X Sop’s Limited(
EMPLOYEE’S .ELATIONS-IPDTABLE E(9E
.ELATIONS-IP
TO3A.DS
SUPE.IO.=,OD
3O.:E.
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T :9 :9G
/%%* >> >>G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
EMPLOYEE’S .ELATIONS-IPD,-A.T E(9E
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s relationship to"ards their superior@co2"orBer at X
Soap’s Limited. :9G o the employees maintain e'cellent relationship bet"een their superior@co2
"orBer and >>G o the employees maintain poor relationship.
9?( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s to%rds t#e %or> en*ironment t X Sop’s Limited(
3O.: EN0I.ONMENTDTABLE E(9?
3O.:
EN0I.ONMENT
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T 16 16G
0AI* >= >=G
/%%* 1; 1;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
3O.: EN0I.ONMENTD,-A.T E(9?
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s to"ards the "orB en!ironment at X Soap’s
Limited. >9G o the employees responded that it is air& 16G ha!e responded that it is e'cellent
and 1;G ha!e responded that it is poor.
9F( Does X Sop’s Limited #e!p t#e emp!o+ee’s in person! prob!emI
X SOAP’s -ELP TO3A.DS EMPLOYEE’s PE.SONAL P.OBLEMDTABLE E(9F
-ELP TO3A.DS
PE.SONAL
P.OBLEM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
%0TE) 1: 1:G
I) S%.E (ASES 3; 3;G
)%T2AT2ALL $1 $1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
X SOAP’s -ELP TO3A.DS EMPLOYEE’s PE.SONAL P.OBLEMD,-A.T E(9F
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart& it can be inerred that 3;G o the employees responded that in some cases
X Soap’s Limited help during personal problem& 1:G o the employees responded that oten the
company helps and 1G responded that the company ne!er help during personal problem.
9G( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s to%rds t#e current bsenteeism po!icies t X Sop’s Limited(
ABSENTEEISM POLI,IES 4TABLE E(9G
0IE3S TO3A.DS
,U..ENT POLI,IES
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T ;6 ;6G
)E,T*AL ># >#G
/%%* 1# 1#G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ABSENTEEISM POLI,IES 4,-A.T E(9G
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s regarding the current absenteeism policies
ollo"ed at X Soap’s Limited. ;6G o the employees responded that the current policies are
e'cellent& >#G o them responded as neutral and 1#G o the employees ind the current policies
to be poor.
9H( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s re&rdin& X Sop’s Limited’s met#od o" #nd!in&
bsenteeism(
MET-OD O1 -ANDLIN' ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(9H
0IE3S TO3A.DS
-ANDLIN' O1
POLI,IES
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
SATIS0IE+ >6 >6G
+IS2SATIS0IE+ :1 :1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
MET-OD O1 -ANDLIN' ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(9H
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s regarding X Soap’s Limited’s method o
handling absenteeism. :1G o the employees are satisied "ith the method and >6G o the
employees are not satisied.
86( T#e "ctors t#t m+ reduce bsenteeism t X Sop’s Limited(
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY .EDU,E ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(86
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY
.EDU,E
ABSENTEEISM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
I)(*EASE I)
),.BE* %0
7%LI+A-S
1> 1>G
/*%4I+I)8
.E+I(AL 0A(ILITIES
13 13G
/*%4I+I)8 )%)2
.%)ETA*-
BE)E0ITS
19 19G
/*%4I+I)8 BETTE*
5%*? (%)+ITI%)S
1; 1;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY .EDU,E ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(86
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the actors that may reduce absenteeism at X Soap’s Limited. 13G o
the employees responded to pro!e medical acilities "ithin the company premises& 19G
responded to pro!ide non2monetary beneits& 1>G o them responded to increase the number o
holidays and 1;G o them responded to pro!ide better "orB conditions.
TDTEST
89( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND 'ENDE.
TABLE NO E(89
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent among male
and emale.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days absent among
male and emale.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that that the signiicance !alue is less than $.$: thereore the
null hypothesis can be reCected& "hich means there is signiicance association bet"een number
o days absent among male and emale& the mean o emale employees are #.9> "hich is greater
than the mean o male employees "hich means the emales tend to absent rom "orB more than
men. This may be due to the domestic problems aced by them.
8E)+E* ) .EA) t d SI8)
0emale =: #.9>
1.#;: 1$9 .$;;
male ##; #.:$
88( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND A'E
TABEL NODE(88
A8E ) .EA) t d SI8)
Belo" ;: :# #.:3
.#$# 1$9 .=1$
Abo!e ;: #:3 #.:9
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent and age.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days absent and age.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that the signiicance !alue is more than $.$: thereore the
null hypothesis is accepted& "hich means there is no signiicance association in the number o
days absent and age. The mean o employees belo" the age o ;: is #.:3 and the mean o
employees abo!e the age o ;: is #.:9& since there is no much association in the mean it can be
inerred that age doesn’t inluence the number o days absent.
.
85( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND DESI'NATION
TABLE NODE(85
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent and
designation.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days and
designation.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that the signiicance !alue is less than $.$: thereore the null
hypothesis can be reCected and it can be concluded rom the mean that the production le!el
employees tend to absent rom "orB more than management le!el employees as the mean o
production le!el employees is #.96 "hich is greater than the mean o management le!el
employees. This may be due to the reason that management le!el employees are at higher
position and i they tend to taBe more lea!e it "ill directly aect the perormance o the
company.
+ESI8)ATI%) ) .EA) t d SI8)
.anagement le!el >3 #.#3
29.36; 1$9 $.$$$
/roduction le!el #9# #.96
8& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een age o the employees and their satisaction "ith "orB signallingsignaling
the independency o the !ariables. The general notion o satisaction "ith "orB rising "ith age
is dispro!ed because e!en younger age employees eel more satisied to"ards their "orB.
56( ,-IDSCUA.E ANALYSIS BET3EEN A'E AND .ELATIONS-IP 3IT-
SUPE.IO.=,OD3O.:E.(
TABLEDE(56
A8E *ELATI%)S7I/ 5IT7
S,/E*I%*@(%25%*?E*S
4AL,E d SI8) I)2
S,00I(IE)T
S,00I(IE)T
1$2;: #= #=
;929$ 13 ;3
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S>
)ull 7ypothesesL2There is no signiicant association in the age and the relationship "ith
superior@co2"orBer at X Soap’s Limited.
Alternate hypothesesL2 There is signiicant association in the age and the relationship "ith
superior@co2"orBer at X Soap’s Limited.
0rom the abo!e table it is seen that the /earson (hi2SHuare signiicance !alue is $.;>>& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een age o the employees and their relationship "ith superior@co2"orBers
signallingsignaling the independency o the !ariables. The general notion o relationship rising
"ith age is dispro!ed because irrespecti!e o their age employees maintain eHual le!el o
relationship "ith their superior@co2"orBers.
59( ,-IDSCUA.E ANALYSIS BET3EEN A'E AND -ANDLIN' O1
ABSENTEEISM ISSUE AT X SOAP’S LIMITED(
TABLEDE(59
A8E 7A)+LI)8 ABSE)TEEIS.
ISS,E
4AL,E d SI8) I)2
S,00I(IE)T
S,00I(IE)T
1$2;: 1$ #6
;929$ ;1 ;$
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S:
,.8 N /.8 #3 $;
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S$& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een years o e'perience o the employees and their salary signaling the
independency o the !ariables. The general notion o salary rising "ith years o e'perience is
dispro!e because in pri!ate companies they ollo" standard salary pacBage unliBe go!ernment
companies "hich !aries depending on e'perience.
This study entitled “A Study on Employee Absenteeism at X’s Soap Ltd” Is based on to analysis the employee’s absenteeism and reason behind their absenteeism. By using this analysis the company can easily identify the measures to overcome it.
The primary data was collected from 100 samples. On the basis, the secondary data analysis and the extensive analysis of primary data, interpretation where drawn for the conclusion. Certain suggestions are also drawn from the analysis to help X soap to overcome absenteeism.
STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ABSENTEEISM AT X SOAP’s LIMITED
Project report submitted in prti! "u!"i!!ment o" t#e re$uirements "or t#e
%rd o" t#e De&ree Mster o" Business Administrtion
Submitted By
SOU'ASSINI(B
E)ecuti*e summr+
This study entitled “A Study on Employee Absenteeism at X’s Soap Ltd” Is
based on to analysis the employee’s absenteeism and reason behind their
absenteeism. By using this analysis the company can easily identiy the measures
to o!ercome it.
The primary data "as collected rom #$$ samples. %n the basis& the
secondary data analysis and the e'tensi!e analysis o primary data& interpretation
"here dra"n or the conclusion. (ertain suggestions are also dra"n rom the
analysis to help X soap to o!ercome absenteeism.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,-APTE. NO/ TITLE PA'E NO/
I(
I)T*%+,(TI%) #
II(
I)+,ST*- A)+ (%./A)- /*%0ILE 123
III(
*E4IE5 %0 LIT*AT,*E 621$
I0(
*ESEA*(7 .E+7%+%L%8- 1#219
0(
+ATA A)AL-SIS A)+ I)TE*/*ETATI%) 132##$
0I(
0I)+I)8S A)+ (%)L,SI%) ###2##:
LIST O1 TABLES
TABLE NO/ NAMES O1 TABLE PA'E NO/
:.# 8E)+E* 13
:.1 A8E 16
:.; E+,(ATI%)AL %4E* ALL 5%*? EX/E*IE)(E ;$
:.: -EA*S %0 EX/E*IE)(E ;#
:.9 +A-S %0 /*ESE)T ;1
:.3 +A-S %0 LEA4E ;;
:.6 *EAS%) 0%* ABSE)TEEIS. ;>
:.= A++ITI%)AL LEA4E ;9
:.#$ ABSE)TEEIS. E00E(T %) %,T /,T ;3
:.## SALA*- ;6
:.#1 SATIS0A(TI%) LE4EL ;=
:.#; ,)+E*STA)+I)8 T%5A*+S 5%*?@A%B
*ES/%)SIBILIT-
>#
:.#> E./L%-EE’S SATIS0A(TI%) >1
:.#: E./L%-EE’S *ELATI%)S7I/ >;
:.#9 5%*? E)4I*%).E)T >>
:.#3 X S%A/’s 7EL/ T%5A*+S E./L%-EE’s /E*S%)AL
/*%BLE.
>:
:.#6 ABSE)TEEIS. /%LI(IES >9
:.#= .ET7%+ %0 7A)+LI)8 ABSE)TEEIS. >3
:.1$ 0A(T%*S T7AT .A- *E+,(E ABSE)TEEIS. >6
:.1# ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ 8E)+E* :$
:.11 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ A8E :#
:.1; ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ +ESI8)ATI%) :1
:.1> ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ EX/E*IE)(E I)
T7E (%./A)-
:;
:.1: ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ %4E* ALL
EX/E*IE)(E
:>
:.19 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ E+,(ATI%) ::
:.13 ),.BE* %0 +A-S ABSE)T A)+ SALA*- :9
:.16 (7I2SG
1=2;$ +A-S $6 $6G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
DAYS O1 P.ESENTD ,-A.T E(?
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the number o days an employee is present in a month at X Soap’s
Limited& it sho"s that :>G o them are present rom 19216 days& ollo"ed by 1:G o them
present or 1;21: days& #;G o them or 1$211 days and 6G o them present up to 1=2;$ days.
F( Tot! number o" d+s t#e emp!o+ee t>es !e*e in mont# t X Sop’s Limited(
DAYS O1 LEA0EDTABLE E(F
NUMBE. O1
LEA0ES TA:EN PE.
MONT-
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
#2: +A-S $; $;G
92#$ +A-S :1 :1G
##2#: +A-S ;; ;;G
AB%4E #: +A-S #1 #1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
DAYS O1 LEA0ED,-A.T E(F
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the number o days an employee taBes lea!e in a month at X Soap’s
Limited& the chart sho"s that :1G o the employees taBe lea!e rom 92#$ days in a month
ollo"ed by ;;G rom ##2#: days& #1G abo!e #: days and only ;G taBes lea!e rom #2: days.
G( T#e reson be#ind t#e emp!o+ee’s bsenteeism t X Sop’s Limited(
.EASON 1O. ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(G
.EASON 1O.
ABSENTEEISM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
+%.ESTI(
/*%BLE.S
;: ;:G
7EALT7 /*%BLE.S >; >;G
LA(? %0 I)TE*EST
I) A%B
$# $#G
5%*? $> $>G
E)4I*%).E)T
%T7E* *EAS%)S #3 #3G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
.EASON 1O. ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(G
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents that& rom the total respondents >;G o the employees coated health
problems as the reason or absenteeism ollo"ed by ;:G "ho coated domestic problems&#G
reasoned lacB o interest in Cob& >G reasoned the "orB en!ironment and #3G coated other
reasons as the reason or their absenteeism.
H( Do t#e emp!o+ees need ddition! !e*eI
ADDITIONAL LEA0EDTABLE E(H
NEED O1
ADDITIONAL LEA0E
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
-ES >1 >1G
)% :6 :6G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ADDITIONAL LEA0ED,-A.T E(H
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart it can be seen that& the respondent’s response to"ards additional lea!e.
:6G o the employees preer more additional lea!e and >1G o them dose not preer additional
lea!e at X Soap’s Limited.
96( Does t#e bsenteeism o" t#e emp!o+ees ""ect t#e output t X Sop’s LimitedI
ABSENTEEISM E11E,T ON OUT PUTDTABLE E(96
ABSENTEEISM’s
E11E,T ON OUTPUT
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
AL5A-S $$ $$G
S%.ETI.ES 11 11G
)E4E* 36 36G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ABSENTEEISM E11E,T ON OUT PUTD,-A.T E(96
In"erenceL
0orm the abo!e chart& it is inerred that rom the total respondents 36G o the employees
responded that their absenteeism "ill not ha!e eect on the output o the company and 11G o
them responded that sometimes their absenteeism may aect the output at X Soap’s Limited.
99( Are t#e emp!o+ees stis"ied %it# t#e s!r+ pro*ided b+ X Sop’s LimitedI
SALA.YDTABLE E(99
SALA.Y P.O0IDED
BY T-E ,OMPANY
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
S,00I(IE)T :3 :3G
I)S,00I(IE)T >; >;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
SALA.YD,-A.T E(99
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart& it can be inerred that rom the total respondents :3G o the employees at
X Soap’s Limited are satisied "ith the salary pro!ided to them and >;G o the employees are
not satisied "ith the salary pacBage.
98( T#e emp!o+ees stis"ied to%rds t#e compenstion o""ered b+ X Sop’s Limited
durin& t#eir time o" !e*eI
SATIS1A,TION LE0ELDTABLE E(98
SATIS1A,TION
LE0ELON T-E
,OMPENSATION
PAID
NUMBE. O1 .ESPONDENTS PE.,ENTA'E
7I87L-2SATIS0IE+ 1> 1>G
SATIS0IE+ ;: ;:G
)E,T*AL 1= 1=G
+IS2SATIS0IE+ #1 #1G
7I87L-2+IS2
SATIS0IE+
$$ $$G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
SATIS1A,TION LE0ELD,-A.T E(98
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s response to"ards the compensation paid by the
company at the time o lea!e taBen. It sho"s that 1=G o the employees are highly satisied "ith
the compensation paid& ;:G o the employees are satisied& 1=G o the employees ha!e
responded neutral and #1G o the employees are dis2satisied "ith the compensation at X Soap’s
Limited.
95( T#e emp!o+ee’s understndin&s to%rds t#eir %or>=job responsibi!ities t X Sop’s
Limited(
UNDE.STANDIN' TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB .ESPONSIBILITYDTABLE E(95
UNDE.STANDIN'
TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB
NUMBE. O1 .ESPONDENTS PE.,ENTA'E
4E*- (LEA* 36 36G
)ET,*AL 11 11G
)%T (LEA* $$ $$G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
UNDE.STANDIN' TO3A.DS 3O.:=BOB .ESPONSIBILITYD,-A.T E(95
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s understanding to"ards "orB@Cob responsibility at X
Soap’s Limited. 36G o the employees are !ery clear about their "orB@Cob and 11G o them are
neutral.
9=G are not satisied.
9E( T#e emp!o+ee’s re!tions#ip to%rds superior=coD%or>er t X Sop’s Limited(
EMPLOYEE’S .ELATIONS-IPDTABLE E(9E
.ELATIONS-IP
TO3A.DS
SUPE.IO.=,OD
3O.:E.
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T :9 :9G
/%%* >> >>G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
EMPLOYEE’S .ELATIONS-IPD,-A.T E(9E
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s relationship to"ards their superior@co2"orBer at X
Soap’s Limited. :9G o the employees maintain e'cellent relationship bet"een their superior@co2
"orBer and >>G o the employees maintain poor relationship.
9?( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s to%rds t#e %or> en*ironment t X Sop’s Limited(
3O.: EN0I.ONMENTDTABLE E(9?
3O.:
EN0I.ONMENT
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T 16 16G
0AI* >= >=G
/%%* 1; 1;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
3O.: EN0I.ONMENTD,-A.T E(9?
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s to"ards the "orB en!ironment at X Soap’s
Limited. >9G o the employees responded that it is air& 16G ha!e responded that it is e'cellent
and 1;G ha!e responded that it is poor.
9F( Does X Sop’s Limited #e!p t#e emp!o+ee’s in person! prob!emI
X SOAP’s -ELP TO3A.DS EMPLOYEE’s PE.SONAL P.OBLEMDTABLE E(9F
-ELP TO3A.DS
PE.SONAL
P.OBLEM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
%0TE) 1: 1:G
I) S%.E (ASES 3; 3;G
)%T2AT2ALL $1 $1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
X SOAP’s -ELP TO3A.DS EMPLOYEE’s PE.SONAL P.OBLEMD,-A.T E(9F
In"erenceL
0rom the abo!e chart& it can be inerred that 3;G o the employees responded that in some cases
X Soap’s Limited help during personal problem& 1:G o the employees responded that oten the
company helps and 1G responded that the company ne!er help during personal problem.
9G( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s to%rds t#e current bsenteeism po!icies t X Sop’s Limited(
ABSENTEEISM POLI,IES 4TABLE E(9G
0IE3S TO3A.DS
,U..ENT POLI,IES
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
EX(ELLE)T ;6 ;6G
)E,T*AL ># >#G
/%%* 1# 1#G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
ABSENTEEISM POLI,IES 4,-A.T E(9G
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s regarding the current absenteeism policies
ollo"ed at X Soap’s Limited. ;6G o the employees responded that the current policies are
e'cellent& >#G o them responded as neutral and 1#G o the employees ind the current policies
to be poor.
9H( T#e emp!o+ee’s *ie%s re&rdin& X Sop’s Limited’s met#od o" #nd!in&
bsenteeism(
MET-OD O1 -ANDLIN' ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(9H
0IE3S TO3A.DS
-ANDLIN' O1
POLI,IES
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
SATIS0IE+ >6 >6G
+IS2SATIS0IE+ :1 :1G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
MET-OD O1 -ANDLIN' ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(9H
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the employee’s !ie"s regarding X Soap’s Limited’s method o
handling absenteeism. :1G o the employees are satisied "ith the method and >6G o the
employees are not satisied.
86( T#e "ctors t#t m+ reduce bsenteeism t X Sop’s Limited(
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY .EDU,E ABSENTEEISMDTABLE E(86
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY
.EDU,E
ABSENTEEISM
NUMBE. O1
.ESPONDENTS
PE.,ENTA'E
I)(*EASE I)
),.BE* %0
7%LI+A-S
1> 1>G
/*%4I+I)8
.E+I(AL 0A(ILITIES
13 13G
/*%4I+I)8 )%)2
.%)ETA*-
BE)E0ITS
19 19G
/*%4I+I)8 BETTE*
5%*? (%)+ITI%)S
1; 1;G
T%TAL #$$ #$$G
1A,TO.S T-AT MAY .EDU,E ABSENTEEISMD,-A.T E(86
In"erenceL
The abo!e chart represents the actors that may reduce absenteeism at X Soap’s Limited. 13G o
the employees responded to pro!e medical acilities "ithin the company premises& 19G
responded to pro!ide non2monetary beneits& 1>G o them responded to increase the number o
holidays and 1;G o them responded to pro!ide better "orB conditions.
TDTEST
89( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND 'ENDE.
TABLE NO E(89
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent among male
and emale.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days absent among
male and emale.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that that the signiicance !alue is less than $.$: thereore the
null hypothesis can be reCected& "hich means there is signiicance association bet"een number
o days absent among male and emale& the mean o emale employees are #.9> "hich is greater
than the mean o male employees "hich means the emales tend to absent rom "orB more than
men. This may be due to the domestic problems aced by them.
8E)+E* ) .EA) t d SI8)
0emale =: #.9>
1.#;: 1$9 .$;;
male ##; #.:$
88( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND A'E
TABEL NODE(88
A8E ) .EA) t d SI8)
Belo" ;: :# #.:3
.#$# 1$9 .=1$
Abo!e ;: #:3 #.:9
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent and age.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days absent and age.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that the signiicance !alue is more than $.$: thereore the
null hypothesis is accepted& "hich means there is no signiicance association in the number o
days absent and age. The mean o employees belo" the age o ;: is #.:3 and the mean o
employees abo!e the age o ;: is #.:9& since there is no much association in the mean it can be
inerred that age doesn’t inluence the number o days absent.
.
85( NUMBE. O1 DAYS ABSENT AND DESI'NATION
TABLE NODE(85
)ull hypothesisL2 There is no signiicance association in the number o days absent and
designation.
Alternate hypothesisL2 There is signiicance association bet"een number o days and
designation.
0rom the abo!e table it can be seen that the signiicance !alue is less than $.$: thereore the null
hypothesis can be reCected and it can be concluded rom the mean that the production le!el
employees tend to absent rom "orB more than management le!el employees as the mean o
production le!el employees is #.96 "hich is greater than the mean o management le!el
employees. This may be due to the reason that management le!el employees are at higher
position and i they tend to taBe more lea!e it "ill directly aect the perormance o the
company.
+ESI8)ATI%) ) .EA) t d SI8)
.anagement le!el >3 #.#3
29.36; 1$9 $.$$$
/roduction le!el #9# #.96
8& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een age o the employees and their satisaction "ith "orB signallingsignaling
the independency o the !ariables. The general notion o satisaction "ith "orB rising "ith age
is dispro!ed because e!en younger age employees eel more satisied to"ards their "orB.
56( ,-IDSCUA.E ANALYSIS BET3EEN A'E AND .ELATIONS-IP 3IT-
SUPE.IO.=,OD3O.:E.(
TABLEDE(56
A8E *ELATI%)S7I/ 5IT7
S,/E*I%*@(%25%*?E*S
4AL,E d SI8) I)2
S,00I(IE)T
S,00I(IE)T
1$2;: #= #=
;929$ 13 ;3
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S>
)ull 7ypothesesL2There is no signiicant association in the age and the relationship "ith
superior@co2"orBer at X Soap’s Limited.
Alternate hypothesesL2 There is signiicant association in the age and the relationship "ith
superior@co2"orBer at X Soap’s Limited.
0rom the abo!e table it is seen that the /earson (hi2SHuare signiicance !alue is $.;>>& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een age o the employees and their relationship "ith superior@co2"orBers
signallingsignaling the independency o the !ariables. The general notion o relationship rising
"ith age is dispro!ed because irrespecti!e o their age employees maintain eHual le!el o
relationship "ith their superior@co2"orBers.
59( ,-IDSCUA.E ANALYSIS BET3EEN A'E AND -ANDLIN' O1
ABSENTEEISM ISSUE AT X SOAP’S LIMITED(
TABLEDE(59
A8E 7A)+LI)8 ABSE)TEEIS.
ISS,E
4AL,E d SI8) I)2
S,00I(IE)T
S,00I(IE)T
1$2;: 1$ #6
;929$ ;1 ;$
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S:
,.8 N /.8 #3 $;
/EA*S%)
(7I2
S$& "hich is
greater than $.$: thereore the )ull 7ypothesis is accepted. 0rom "hich it can be said there is no
association bet"een years o e'perience o the employees and their salary signaling the
independency o the !ariables. The general notion o salary rising "ith years o e'perience is
dispro!e because in pri!ate companies they ollo" standard salary pacBage unliBe go!ernment
companies "hich !aries depending on e'perience.