Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases

M

manishsinghon

Manish Singh
Tobacco alone sells itself due to the fact that it is very tranquil to someone who is usually stressed out effortlessly and the tobacco company is just giving people what they want.

It is also important to note that tobacco is not only risky to the smoker;

it is also damaging to anyone in the region within the parameter in which an individual inhales the smoke which is also recognized as second hand smokers.

Many of these chemicals that are found in cigarettes are recognized to be carcinogenic. Some of these carcinogenic include the following; cadium, chromium, benzene, radon, nickel, and vinyl chloride
 
yes they should because its is available everywhere and easily people are always curious to try it once and then become addicted to it tobacco company are one reason for it people don't notice the caution on the pack the warning must be shown every where where cigarettes are sold
 
No.Because they can't force to smoke.So, they are not responsible.
It is their business.If you feel responsible about your health,you can't smoke.
 
The government makes immense amounts of money through tobbaco trade and if a portion can be used to help the people back I think it should be made legally binding g for companies to pay a part to welfare
 
thanks unjust.. if this was the case, then no drug should be available.. Alcohol factories must be charged for selling alcohol... It would lead to black marketing of goods only.

Proper awareness is required to spread the cause for not smoking
 
its like asking should the companies which make buses and trucks be responsible if the person driving them, causes an accident.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top