"Should Tie Games Be Allowed in Sports? Let’s Talk About the Coward’s Ending."

​

Imagine watching 90 minutes of heart-stopping football. Or five quarters of grueling hockey. Or nine innings of intense baseball. And then... it ends in a tie. No winner. No loser. Just mutual shoulder shrugs and the unsatisfying taste of “meh.”


Ties are the participation trophies of professional sports. In an industry built on drama, competition, and ultimate victory — how can we accept an ending that screams indecision?


Let’s call it out: ties rob fans, players, and the integrity of the game. Sports aren’t just about strategy and teamwork; they’re about decisive moments, triumphs, heartbreaks — glory. A tie is none of that. It’s a boring compromise. It’s the league shrugging its shoulders and saying, “Eh, that’s good enough.”


Proponents argue that ties prevent unnecessary fatigue or injuries. But at what cost? A sport without resolution is a story with no ending — a movie that fades to black before the climax. If players are too tired, expand rosters. If games go on too long, refine overtime rules. But don’t strip the audience of the thrill of victory and the sting of defeat.


Worse yet, ties often have confusing point consequences in standings. In soccer or hockey, a draw might help one team and hurt another in a way that makes absolutely no sense to casual fans. It’s alienating, unnecessary, and dull.


This isn’t youth rec league — this is elite-level competition. If you can't crown a winner, why are we even keeping score?


We need resolution. We need winners. Because that’s what makes sports… sports.

---

 

[Priyani Gupta]

Your article boldly challenges the idea of ties in professional sports, and rightly so — ties can be frustrating for many fans and players alike. The core argument that sports thrive on decisive moments and clear winners is logical and practical. However, I’d like to add some nuance and perhaps a slightly controversial twist to deepen the conversation.


Firstly, I appreciate your emphasis on how ties can feel like “participation trophies” that dilute the drama and thrill we expect from elite competition. Sports are indeed about pushing boundaries, testing skills under pressure, and ultimately crowning a champion. The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat are essential ingredients in the emotional rollercoaster that keeps audiences hooked. An unresolved tie can feel like a story left unfinished, which can be dissatisfying.


Yet, it’s important to acknowledge that the insistence on always having a winner can sometimes undermine the integrity and spirit of certain sports. Take soccer, for example: the game’s history and tradition have embraced draws as a valid outcome for decades. In tournaments and leagues, ties reflect balanced competition — neither side dominated enough to earn outright victory, but both earned something. The idea that a tie is “boring” may come from a cultural preference, particularly in North American sports, where overtime and shootouts are more common. But in many parts of the world, ties are accepted and even respected as part of the game’s rhythm.


Your point about injury prevention and fatigue is practical. While expanding rosters or tweaking overtime rules could help reduce exhaustion, we must also consider player safety and long-term health. Not every sport or league has the resources or calendar flexibility to extend matches indefinitely. Sometimes a tie is a reasonable compromise between competitive spirit and physical limits.


The criticism of confusing point systems around ties is fair. Sports organizations could do a better job of educating casual fans on how standings work and why draws impact rankings differently. However, complexity in scoring can also add a strategic layer for dedicated fans and analysts. Understanding when a draw benefits or hurts a team can deepen engagement for those who invest in the sport.


Your article hints that ties are a sign of weak leadership or league laziness. While that is a strong and appealing stance, I’d argue it oversimplifies a complex issue. Ties can be a reflection of the unpredictability and parity that make sports compelling. If two teams are so evenly matched that neither can secure a win, that in itself is an achievement worth respecting.


In conclusion, while I agree that ties often feel anticlimactic and disrupt the clear narrative of winners and losers, I suggest we view them not merely as failures or compromises but as nuanced outcomes that sometimes preserve fairness, safety, and tradition. Instead of eliminating ties outright, perhaps the solution lies in smarter rule adjustments, better communication with fans, and respecting the diversity of sports cultures worldwide.


After all, sports are as much about the journey and the stories told on the field as they are about the final scoreboard.