Should Euthanasia(MERCY KILLING) be legalized in India??

raiv88

Rajeev Kumar
euthanasia.jpg


EUTHANASIA OR mercy killing or Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) is the bringing about of the gentle death of a patient in the case of a painful, chronic and incurable disease. Now, all these adjectives are of equal importance. A painful disease is one in which the patient suffers unbearable and excruciating pain. A chronic disease is a long lasting one and an incurable disease is one whose cure has not been found till date.

Netherlands was one of the first countries to legalize euthanasia followed by Canada, state of Oregon in USA and Columbia. The state of Oregon has a ‘Death with Dignity’ law, which has been in place for almost 10 years. It has allowed terminally ill patients to take legal, proscribed medication to end their suffering. The legalizing of euthanasia has been a bone of contention throughout the world and will continue to do so but no one asks a terminally ill patient the kind of pain he goes through. The individual should have at least the right to choose a graceful death for himself. Why should he be allowed to keep suffering day and night?

The essence of human life is to be able to live a dignified life but when some law forces you to live in intense pain and humiliation, there is something wrong with our society. Who are we to prolong the life of one who is suffering and has decided without any undue pressure that he would like to be put to rest? Obviously legalization of euthanasia should not include anyone wanting to end their life at the flimsiest of excuses but a patient should be allowed to decide when he has suffered enough.

Apart from the miserable pain, that the patient goes through, the trauma and the emotional turmoil his relatives go through is also immense. To see your close ones suffering and going through pain is not an easy sight. You wish the laws should be changed. After all as an individual, you decide where to marry, you decide where to work, and at the last hurdle of your life, you should be allowed to choose how do you want to end your life.

But this question cannot be answered so easily. The science of medicine has over the years seen miracles taking place. As long as the patient lives, there is hope. And as long as there is hope, anything can happen. With the new technological advancements taking place all around the globe, we could have cures for diseases like AIDS, cancer etc.

On the other hand, the chances of the legalization being misused are also very high. What if the patient is in coma and is unable to make a decision, should the relatives be allowed to make it? This is the era of family disputes over property and money. People could also get away with cold-blooded murder. Legalising voluntary Euthanasia would lead to involuntary euthanasia. In this society, full of greed and corruption anything is possible.

In a country like ours, the religious aspects also have to be considered before taking such decisions. The Bible says, “Thou shalt not kill” And even Islam does not allow anyone to take away life. Is our society mature enough to understand the implications of this? We have cases, where doctors are often beaten up if the patient was not treated properly, what would happen to a doctor if he merely suggested Euthanasia to the relatives? Will the relatives be able to understand the suffering of the patient?

Life is a gift, and even a life of pain is a life at least. Some people feel we don’t choose when to be born and we should not be given the right to choose when to die. On the contrary, others feel that a life of pain is not a life but an imposition and we should be at least allowed to end it in a dignified peaceful manner. Euthanasia could be legalized, but the laws would have to be very stringent. Every case will have to be carefully monitored taking into consideration the point of views of the patient, the relatives and the doctors. But whether Indian society is mature enough to face this, after all it’s a matter of life and death, is yet to be seen.
 
I don't like the term 'Mercy Killing'.. two words totally contradicting each other...
Sometimes people just hear the words and think there is something really bad about it... not realizing what it actually means...
To answer you question, I would say yes, I would rather Pull the plug, then let the person suffer intense pain
 
Quebec opens euthanasia debate

The Quebec government will hold roving public consultations on the question of euthanasia, Health Minister Yves Bolduc announced Thursday following a request from the opposition Parti Québécois.

The national assembly's standing committee on health and social services will first hear from experts on the issue and prepare a consultation document.

Bolduc acknowledged the issue of euthanasia is complex.

"There are many elements that we must reflect on, including the definition of terms, end-of-life care and, equally, how we accompany these people," Bolduc said. "We all have the same intention — that is to say, that people can die with dignity."

Calling for a provincewide consultation, PQ Leader Pauline Marois said it is time for a non-partisan debate on the issue.

With assisted suicide already permitted under certain circumstances in some U.S. states and European countries, a debate on the delicate question is inevitable in Quebec, Marois said.

"We have recently seen many associations pronounce themselves on the question or the need to have a debate," Marois said.

She pointed to the province’s Federation of Medical Specialists and the Federation of General Practitioners, as well as the Association of Feminine Education and Social Action, which have debated the issue.

The province’s Council for the Rights of the Sick has said the focus should be on improving end-of-life care for the ill.

Though legalizing euthanasia would require changes to the Criminal Code of Canada, Marois said Quebec could pressure Ottawa on the issue if there is a provincewide consensus on the question.

At the federal level, the Bloc Québécois is supporting a bill that would legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide, but a second reading of Bill C-384 isn’t expected until the new year.

SOURCE:
CBC News - Montreal - Quebec opens euthanasia debate
 
It should be legalised. It is the person's own right whether he or she lives or dies. Who is the government to tell him not to die and suffer pain instead?
 
SC admits paralysed sexual assault victim's plea to end life
Dhananjay Mahapatra, TNN 17 December 2009, 02:17am IST


NEW DELHI: The plight of a 61-year-old women, who suffered a brutal sexual assault 36 years ago and has been lying in a vegetative state in a Mumbai hospital ever since, has moved the Supreme Court into setting aside its pro-life stance and examining the woman’s plea that her life be ended.

The woman, Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug, does not want to live any more. Doctors have told her there is no chance of any improvement in her state. So she, through her ‘next friend’ Pinki Virani, decided to move the SC with a plea to ‘‘direct KEM Hospital not to force-feed her’’.

‘‘Is this plea not akin to euthanasia?’’ asked a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices A K Ganguly and B S Chauhan, when the matter came up for hearing.

To this, her counsel Shekhar Naphade countered: ‘‘Is not keeping the woman in this persistent vegetative state by force-feeding violative of her right to live with dignity guaranteed by Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution?’’

‘‘She is beyond cure. Let the court inquire about what medical science has in store for her. It appears there has been utter indifference of medical world towards her. The SC has to lay down some guideline in such cases,’’ he added.

The pro-life apex court, which had negated pleas of termination of pregnancy of a mentally retarded girl resulting from a rape at a Nari Niketan in Chandigarh and a similar plea from a Mumbai couple for terminating a diseased fetus, asked Naphade: ‘‘Do you mean right to life includes right to die?’’

Without taking the risk of hinging his arguments on that line, Naphade gave it a small tweak and said: ‘‘She is going through a torture of a life. Is this human rights? Should the medical authorities not be activated to do something? This is not a case to be left aside and forgotten. The apex court must lay down some guidelines.’’

Setting aside its previous position on the issue, the bench agreed to examine the merits of the petition and sought responses from the Union government, Maharashtra, Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai, Commissioner of Mumbai Police and Dean of KEM Hospital. This is how her next friend — a legal term used for a person speaking on behalf of someone who is incapacitated — describes Shanbaug: ‘‘Her bones are brittle. Her skin is like ‘papier mache’ stretched over a skeleton. Her wrists are twisted inwards, her fingers are bent and fisted towards her palms, resulting in growing nails tearing into the flesh very often. Her teeth are decayed and giving her pain. Food is mashed and given to her in semi-solid form. She is in a persistent vegetative state.’’

SOURCE:
SC admits paralysed sexual assault victim's plea to end life - India - The Times of India
 
whic is better long term pain and sufferin to oneself and , burden to others both emotinally and finanicially... or peaceful death..... peaceful death is better....
 
things like this should never be legelised in india.all out epics tell us if someone beet on one side show the other in this sitution how can we beet someone
 
It should never be legalised in India....If it becomes legal, then lots of stupids ll make use of this & crime ll be increasing for sure!!!!!
 
I would say it shall not be legalized. People may misuse this one, and no one is having the right to take anyone's life.
 
I think that euthnesia be legalised in India too, as in some other countries. However there should be strict rules so that nobody can misuse it.
 
It should be legalized because just like living with dignity it is dieing with dignity rather than staying like a vegetative entity......
 
This topic was for my mock GD.
Well according to me the decision should be left upon the patient. One should draw a line between suiciding and mercy killing.
second point: The doctor should also be ready for mercy killing. As said earlier it is better to let a person die if he is suffering badly rather than keeping him alive and suffer more.
 
The Government can make it legalised but for that there must be certain condition that needs to be followed.

This will ensure that it will be done only when needed and depending upon case to case..
 
Euthanasia will be like a double edged sword. SOme may use it professionally and some may misuse it. What we need to get to know is WHO decides. I think a middle path maybe tread, that is if an individual is in a coma and chances of coming out is remote, then Yes. Infact even now the same is being done, when a patient is sinking and all the life saving equipments fail, the doctors do tell the family members that we can now do away with them. So a good purposeful debate is mandatory before it becomes a law.
 
A person having a painful death does not need any debate for it.
It's better to die then suffer with unbearable pain each day.

Hence condition must be stated in what condition the term "Euthanasia" can be used and is appropriate.
It can be legalized if proper efforts are taken to make it a law!!
 
There was a similar euphoria In the early 1970's and 80's when it came to legalizing abortion...On moral grounds I believe euthanasia can be legalized..but on legal grounds implementing it can lead to many questions...after all we are legitamizing another means to end a human life...
 
Back
Top