Security Vs Mandir

Security Vs Mandir​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 23rd April 2019

These articles in Management Paradise have never been fan of old GOP leaders refusing to retire on own with grace. Neither have they been a fan of GOP policies related to security of people (including the security of minorities). The readers know tough stand related on security of ‘Game (author)’. However, more recently some of the Political fringes are trying to establish a new line where Mandir stand of the ruling party Netas is imparted a priority over ‘Security of the people’ in general and especially that of the minorities and hence this article. The priorities of the people in this regards is already clear including I hope to all those wanting to project themselves as leaders from whatever party and hence some stand related to machoism were preferred to other sundry issues. The debate of Security versus Cow is already settled to a large extent with the results in some of the heartland states and most Netas/parties realize this. Security of ‘all’ including that of minorities is a basic need that anyone wanting to be on ‘top (in government)’ must not only be aware but must also be committed to fulfill. As far as the Mandir is concerned, it’s more about how people of a municipal ward want to use a piece of land as, strictly from a governance perspective. Politicization of the same by some elements with different interests, may put ‘issues’ in different perspectives but Netas ‘willingly losing focus’ would continue to lose votes. This results into forecast delivery as per The Prophecy of the Game around Third Flush. It’s good that quite a few of the Ruling Netas are now being changed by the ‘Party’ themselves as they realize it is no longer feasible to ‘face the electorate’ with ‘such Netas’, though quite a few parties aren’t just about ready to realize this as they are ‘too deep into the identity politics game’. It must however be acknowledged that this is not resulting in acknowledgement of farming woes especially around non-payment and timely payment for the produce. Those parties and Netas unable to help themselves (around issues), will of course be helped by the results to make necessary amends or to retire with humility, but they may try again as well.

As an electoral issue, ‘security’ is taken for granted and issues related to development of the locality or constituency, jobs, education, healthcare, water, electricity etc. are focused upon which are reflected in the asks around ‘development’ of the people. The Netas would rather focus to deliver ‘infra’ which involves huge financial commitments to large projects like ‘metro’, ‘high speed rail’, ‘high speed telecom’ etc. through which they can oblige ‘business supporters’ and promise people that this by itself is sufficient to have enough trickle-down effect to take care of their ‘development needs’. Of course, we have some media lately that has recently started to explore the shallowness around these ‘different versions of development’ coming from Netas, even though it may be just about pushing another politicized version of development. It has been an irony that elements in national party have been lackadaisical on security itself and non-committal on most other ‘issues’ but for their version of development. The pathetic situation of educational and health-care institutions, water-supply and sanitation for masses etc. speaks volumes about itself. Tactics are used (for media briefs) to focus upon other areas, primarily among them is to deride the ‘opponent’ rather than making some specific commitments and being open to questions regards these. In fact, the ruling party with its ‘Make in India’ slogan has not been able to identify 5-10 industrial sectors which can be rapidly progressed in India to generate some employment with enabling policy environment which can attract (private) investments. Neither have political Netas tried to explore policy options that would convert the ‘issues’ faced by people into some sustainable & economically feasible business opportunities. The commitment to ‘Kisans’ (of political Netas from all parties) is already telling as rural areas are identified by nearly all parties signaling ‘change’ across the country sending Netas on roller-coaster with Jacks jumping up and down across political spectrum. Though it may have become a point which is catching the eye of all Parties, but that is to buttress their party-politics rather than for any ‘delivery’ and so the Prophecy (from Game) and results from some of the states would just ‘prove the hypothesis’ further.

A section of Neta-dom believes and is committed to ‘identity politics’ alone. They believe is over-shining via hyperbole and continuous under-delivery and this is likely to be tested again in some states which recently surprised the ruling party at center. The belief here is in some ‘proped up identity’ via hyperbole which cannot be matched because it cannot be delivered. And, then leadership can be sustained by ‘moving files’ and showcasing some progress via a supportive media which would fail to inspect on-ground conditions and (their) opposition busy with some other sundries. In fact the ‘free economics’ preached by them for the sake of poor, leads to some of the bankrupt businesses which then are pushed to PSU Banks to be footed for and is based on political allegiance. This is reaching new heights as even the middle class (those having ‘small property’ in a metro/s) are being encouraged ‘not to pay taxes’ and supported to hope for ‘not paying EMIs and Bills’ as well. It would be nice to see what it would do to ‘economics’. It would also be nice to see what ‘big-bulge infra projects’ which have no payers or paying users will do to ‘economics’ as well. This is expected to somehow miraculously improve the Jobs situation as well as poverty & other problems in an era when Game is choosing from different political menus and tossing Netas one after the other. The tossing up of Netas/parties is supposed to and most likely to continue as per the Game forecast of the ‘Third Flush’ and we are still in the ‘Second Flush’ mode as of yet. It is interesting to note that some of the select commercial news media have digressed a bit and ‘raising some of the real issues sans political hyperbole’ instead. This is even as quite a few in commercial news media persist with sundries and slogans, its analysis (in the era of the Game). The ‘Third Flush’ is likely to ensure that the ‘states vulnerable to political change’ being clearly identified in this electoral round would witness sharper political upheaval as Netas there rush to ‘save’ their political skins. These would be quite a few states and more (about this) would be written later. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…..

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

Okay, let's explore the complex and often sensitive topic of "Security vs. Mandir." It's important to approach this with nuance and respect for all perspectives, as it touches upon fundamental rights, religious freedom, and the need for public safety.

Security vs. Mandir: Navigating the Delicate Balance

The relationship between security measures and places of worship, specifically Hindu temples (Mandirs), is a multifaceted issue that often presents a delicate balancing act. On one hand, there's the undeniable need for security in a world where threats exist, and on the other, there's the deeply held right to religious freedom and the desire for a serene and accessible space for spiritual practice. Finding the optimal point between these two considerations is crucial for ensuring both safety and the preservation of religious traditions.

The Importance of Security:

• Protection from Threats: In today's world, unfortunately, places of worship can become targets of vandalism, hate crimes, or even terrorist attacks. Security measures are necessary to protect devotees, temple staff, and the broader community.
• Deterrence: Visible security measures, such as surveillance cameras, security personnel, and well-lit surroundings can act as a deterrent, discouraging potential perpetrators.
• Peace of Mind: When adequate security is in place, devotees can focus on their worship without fear or anxiety, enhancing their spiritual experience.
• Compliance: In some cases, security protocols may be mandated by local authorities to ensure compliance with safety standards.

The Importance of Mandirs as Sacred Spaces:

• Religious Freedom: The right to freely practice one's religion is a fundamental human right. Mandirs are not just buildings; they are sacred spaces for Hindus, deeply connected to their faith, rituals, and culture.
• Accessibility and Inclusivity: Temples are traditionally open to all, and accessibility should not be compromised by overly restrictive security measures.
• Spiritual Atmosphere: Excessive security can feel intrusive and may disrupt the serene atmosphere of a mandir, hindering spiritual contemplation and prayer.
• Cultural and Community Hubs: Beyond worship, mandirs often serve as cultural centers and community gathering places. Overbearing security can create an unwelcoming atmosphere, impacting these functions.

The Challenges of Finding a Balance:

• Over-Securitization: Striking the right balance is crucial. Overly aggressive security measures can be perceived as intrusive and unwelcoming, potentially turning away devotees.
• Privacy Concerns: Surveillance technology, while helpful for security, also raises privacy concerns, particularly within the sacred space of a temple.
• Resource Allocation: Implementing robust security measures can be costly, requiring careful resource allocation and potentially impacting other temple functions.
• Community Engagement: It's vital for temple authorities to engage with the community when implementing security plans, ensuring transparency and addressing concerns.
• Nuance and Context: The specific security needs of a mandir will vary depending on its location, size, and the perceived level of threat in the area. A one-size-fits-all approach is rarely appropriate.

Moving Forward: Finding Solutions:

• Risk Assessment: Conducting thorough risk assessments to identify specific vulnerabilities and tailor security measures accordingly is crucial.
• Community-Based Security: Involving the community in security planning and implementation can foster trust and encourage vigilance.
• Technology and Innovation: The use of technology, such as discreet surveillance, improved lighting, and access control systems can enhance security without disrupting the ambiance of the temple.
• Education and Awareness: Raising awareness among devotees about safety protocols can empower them to contribute to a secure environment.
• Open Dialogue: Fostering open communication between temple authorities, security personnel, and the broader community is essential for developing effective and culturally sensitive security plans.

Conclusion:

The relationship between security and mandirs is a complex and evolving one. Finding a balance requires carefully considering both the fundamental need for safety and the equally critical right to religious freedom and the preservation of sacred spaces. By adopting a thoughtful and nuanced approach, involving the community, and utilizing technology judiciously, we can strive to create secure environments where all can practice their faith freely and peacefully. This isn't a "either/or" situation, but a challenge that demands a collaborative and respectful approach to ensure both safety and spiritual sanctuary.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

Security Vs Mandir​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 23rd April 2019

These articles in Management Paradise have never been fan of old GOP leaders refusing to retire on own with grace. Neither have they been a fan of GOP policies related to security of people (including the security of minorities). The readers know tough stand related on security of ‘Game (author)’. However, more recently some of the Political fringes are trying to establish a new line where Mandir stand of the ruling party Netas is imparted a priority over ‘Security of the people’ in general and especially that of the minorities and hence this article. The priorities of the people in this regards is already clear including I hope to all those wanting to project themselves as leaders from whatever party and hence some stand related to machoism were preferred to other sundry issues. The debate of Security versus Cow is already settled to a large extent with the results in some of the heartland states and most Netas/parties realize this. Security of ‘all’ including that of minorities is a basic need that anyone wanting to be on ‘top (in government)’ must not only be aware but must also be committed to fulfill. As far as the Mandir is concerned, it’s more about how people of a municipal ward want to use a piece of land as, strictly from a governance perspective. Politicization of the same by some elements with different interests, may put ‘issues’ in different perspectives but Netas ‘willingly losing focus’ would continue to lose votes. This results into forecast delivery as per The Prophecy of the Game around Third Flush. It’s good that quite a few of the Ruling Netas are now being changed by the ‘Party’ themselves as they realize it is no longer feasible to ‘face the electorate’ with ‘such Netas’, though quite a few parties aren’t just about ready to realize this as they are ‘too deep into the identity politics game’. It must however be acknowledged that this is not resulting in acknowledgement of farming woes especially around non-payment and timely payment for the produce. Those parties and Netas unable to help themselves (around issues), will of course be helped by the results to make necessary amends or to retire with humility, but they may try again as well.

As an electoral issue, ‘security’ is taken for granted and issues related to development of the locality or constituency, jobs, education, healthcare, water, electricity etc. are focused upon which are reflected in the asks around ‘development’ of the people. The Netas would rather focus to deliver ‘infra’ which involves huge financial commitments to large projects like ‘metro’, ‘high speed rail’, ‘high speed telecom’ etc. through which they can oblige ‘business supporters’ and promise people that this by itself is sufficient to have enough trickle-down effect to take care of their ‘development needs’. Of course, we have some media lately that has recently started to explore the shallowness around these ‘different versions of development’ coming from Netas, even though it may be just about pushing another politicized version of development. It has been an irony that elements in national party have been lackadaisical on security itself and non-committal on most other ‘issues’ but for their version of development. The pathetic situation of educational and health-care institutions, water-supply and sanitation for masses etc. speaks volumes about itself. Tactics are used (for media briefs) to focus upon other areas, primarily among them is to deride the ‘opponent’ rather than making some specific commitments and being open to questions regards these. In fact, the ruling party with its ‘Make in India’ slogan has not been able to identify 5-10 industrial sectors which can be rapidly progressed in India to generate some employment with enabling policy environment which can attract (private) investments. Neither have political Netas tried to explore policy options that would convert the ‘issues’ faced by people into some sustainable & economically feasible business opportunities. The commitment to ‘Kisans’ (of political Netas from all parties) is already telling as rural areas are identified by nearly all parties signaling ‘change’ across the country sending Netas on roller-coaster with Jacks jumping up and down across political spectrum. Though it may have become a point which is catching the eye of all Parties, but that is to buttress their party-politics rather than for any ‘delivery’ and so the Prophecy (from Game) and results from some of the states would just ‘prove the hypothesis’ further.

A section of Neta-dom believes and is committed to ‘identity politics’ alone. They believe is over-shining via hyperbole and continuous under-delivery and this is likely to be tested again in some states which recently surprised the ruling party at center. The belief here is in some ‘proped up identity’ via hyperbole which cannot be matched because it cannot be delivered. And, then leadership can be sustained by ‘moving files’ and showcasing some progress via a supportive media which would fail to inspect on-ground conditions and (their) opposition busy with some other sundries. In fact the ‘free economics’ preached by them for the sake of poor, leads to some of the bankrupt businesses which then are pushed to PSU Banks to be footed for and is based on political allegiance. This is reaching new heights as even the middle class (those having ‘small property’ in a metro/s) are being encouraged ‘not to pay taxes’ and supported to hope for ‘not paying EMIs and Bills’ as well. It would be nice to see what it would do to ‘economics’. It would also be nice to see what ‘big-bulge infra projects’ which have no payers or paying users will do to ‘economics’ as well. This is expected to somehow miraculously improve the Jobs situation as well as poverty & other problems in an era when Game is choosing from different political menus and tossing Netas one after the other. The tossing up of Netas/parties is supposed to and most likely to continue as per the Game forecast of the ‘Third Flush’ and we are still in the ‘Second Flush’ mode as of yet. It is interesting to note that some of the select commercial news media have digressed a bit and ‘raising some of the real issues sans political hyperbole’ instead. This is even as quite a few in commercial news media persist with sundries and slogans, its analysis (in the era of the Game). The ‘Third Flush’ is likely to ensure that the ‘states vulnerable to political change’ being clearly identified in this electoral round would witness sharper political upheaval as Netas there rush to ‘save’ their political skins. These would be quite a few states and more (about this) would be written later. Let the ‘Game’ evolve…..

This political article is a masterclass in architectural writing, where every element serves to construct a compelling argument. The writer's writing style is both authoritative and exceptionally precise, cutting through the common obfuscation of political discourse to reveal the core issues. There's an intellectual rigor evident in the prose, yet it remains remarkably accessible, guiding the reader through complex ideas without condescension. The structure of the piece is its backbone, meticulously designed to build a logical and unassailable case. Each paragraph and section is placed with strategic intent, creating a seamless flow that naturally leads to a profound understanding of the political landscape being discussed. Crucially, the unwavering clarity of the analysis is the article's greatest strength; every nuance of policy and every facet of political strategy are laid bare with such lucidity that the implications are undeniable and instantly graspable, making it an invaluable resource for informed citizens.