Promise Results Vs Action Results

Promise Results Vs Action Results​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 5th Feb. 2017

With elections in the major state, political slugfest seems at its peak. On one side we have Netas and parties raising banner of Results that may have been obtained against the promises. On the other hand, parties want to discuss Actions alone rather than the overall results obtained by it for the people. The second case here is trickier. This is because both the party at the center as well as the party or alliance in the state are answerable but both have been elusive. The commercial news media on its count is merely a carrier of the rhetoric from both sides. What people can easily perceive is a failure of job growth as well as a lack of promised unemployment benefits to the youth. However discussions in the commercial news media would steer around the Notebandi action against black money or the Highways et al around development plank. Then of course we have Netas who would pitch up the promise of ‘development of mandir’ as well as ‘development of backward & minorities including reservations’. The last has largely become irrelevant although Netas unable to identify and sell ‘new issues’ still continue to rely on the ‘re-cycled slogans and the ‘independent’ commercial news media also continues to service their audience in accordance, rather than ‘question’ the Netas.

What has been the biggest failure of the commercial news media is that it fails to raise the issue of the quality of governance and link this to re-elections or vote seeking planks of parties’ basis which people may decide to formulate their political opinion. This gives Netas an opportunity whereby which if one side of NEtas get beaten a bit more, the other side of the NEtas claim that they are nothing short of a global phenomenon and are ably supported to do so by the elements within the independent commercial news media with all its claim to be a guardian of public interests, free speech and being the forth pillar of democracy.There have been literary ‘no questions’ why processed food sector has not received any fillip in the country of 1.3 billion, even though the sector is known to be a large employer. While we see support or opposition to Food Retail FDI and Netas with some claiming to be ‘acclaimed economists’ can sell the proposition as job generating as well as streamlining the supply chain, but fail to explain any rationale. So we have the ‘Khet ke Aaloo’ questioning, with the commercial news media sticking to 'public issues' rather than 'one of opinion in social media'. Of course, the rants of the Netas in government around Naxalism or Anti-country nature doesn’t help, but I am sure that such planks doesn’t work and would become fairly evident in the elections when parties are wooing the ‘Charged ones’ for alliance in some of the states. Basically what Netas do not understand is that when they christen rather ‘peaceful protestors or political workers’ as such, it perhaps convinces some people that at least some action is happening somewhere (even if this may not be the real case). So action lovers or seekers are attracted towards that end simply because the alternatives are trying to de-market this one rather trying to be an action center on their own.

What however may be a concern arena is that the parties seem to be lacking alternative policy sets regards macro factors. This is mainly on account that parties present a ‘promise’ manifestos rather than a possible budgets for next 5 years detailing how within the resources, their performance would be different. This can be further substantiated with some other laws and policy around issues that the leaders may want to canvass for support. While a projected budget can be a more realistic way of presenting what may be possible to be done in a realistic manner, however what may be lacking is parties and Netas who may use such method and come up while negotiating the electoral mine successfully. What basically the political competition is about presently, is promises and perception management. Evasive Netas, not wanting to face questions but simply walk away brandishing their super star status trying to make hay in sunshine. The other issue is behavior of the national political parties themselves. Herein if national political party (or any other party) decides to collaborate with any specific party, then all questions over its past are made to seem irrelevant and quite strangely the ‘independent’ commercial news media (at least a section of it) follows suite. It is the other parties and Netas who may still seem to be questioning, however the overall balance is generally tilted towards the new combination. Now there might be some exceptions to this wherein even the new combination is browbeaten, but such cases are rather limited. In fact the journos need to work on to explore & debate this phenomenon otherwise will continue to be overwhelmed by the ‘social media’.

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

Promise Results vs. Action Results: Understanding the Dynamics of Commitment and Execution​

In the realm of personal and professional relationships, the distinction between "promise results" and "action results" is a critical one. These two concepts highlight the importance of not just what is said or promised, but also what is actually done. While promises set expectations and can be motivating, actions are the tangible outcomes that ultimately define success or failure. This article explores the nuances of both, their impacts on trust, and why aligning promises with actions is crucial for building credible and effective relationships.

Promise Results: Setting the Stage​

Definition: Promise results refer to the outcomes or goals that are verbally or written committed to by an individual or organization. These promises are often made to stakeholders, clients, or team members and serve as a roadmap for what is expected to be achieved.

Examples:

• A company promises to deliver a product by a specific date.
• A politician promises to implement certain policies if elected.
• A friend promises to help you move to a new house next weekend.

Benefits:

1. Clarity and Expectations: Promises provide clear expectations and help stakeholders understand what they can anticipate.
2. Motivation: Committing to a goal can motivate individuals and teams to work towards achieving it.
3. Accountability: Promises create a sense of accountability and responsibility, as people are more likely to follow through on what they have committed to.

Risks:

1. Overpromising: Making unrealistic promises can lead to disappointment and loss of trust when they are not met.
2. Lack of Execution: If promises are not backed by actions, they can erode trust and credibility over time.
3. Stakeholder Frustration: Unfulfilled promises can frustrate stakeholders, leading to negative reviews and damaged relationships.

Action Results: The Proof of the Pudding​

Definition: Action results are the actual outcomes or accomplishments that result from the efforts and actions taken by an individual or organization. These are the tangible, measurable results that demonstrate the fulfillment of promises or the achievement of goals.

Examples:

• A company delivers the product on the promised date.
• A politician enacts the policies they promised.
• A friend shows up and helps you move as agreed.

Benefits:

1. Trust and Credibility: Consistently delivering on promises builds trust and enhances credibility.
2. Satisfaction: Stakeholders are more satisfied when they see tangible results.
3. Reputation: A track record of successful action results can lead to a positive reputation and increased opportunities.

Risks:

1. Resource Drain: Focusing solely on action results without clear promises can lead to inefficiencies and resource misallocation.
2. Misalignment: If actions do not align with the expectations set by promises, stakeholders may feel misled or disappointed.
3. Burnout: Constantly pushing for action results without a clear plan can lead to burnout and unsustainable practices.

The Importance of Alignment​

The key to building and maintaining strong relationships is ensuring that promise results align with action results. This alignment is crucial for several reasons:

1. Trust Building:
   
   • Consistency: When promises are consistently followed by actions, trust is built and maintained.
   • Reliability: Trusting someone means believing that they will do what they say they will do.
2. Effective Communication:
   
   • Clarity: Clear and realistic promises set the stage for effective communication and mutual understanding.
   • Transparency: Transparent communication about progress and any changes in the plan helps manage expectations and maintains trust.
3. Performance and Outcomes:
   
   • Goal Achievement: Aligning promises with actions ensures that goals are met and outcomes are achieved.
   • Continuous Improvement: Regularly comparing promises to actions helps identify areas for improvement and ensures ongoing success.

Case Studies: The Impact of Promise-Action Alignment​

1. Case Study: Successful Company Launch
   
   • Promise: A tech startup promises to release a revolutionary new app within six months.
   • Action: The team works diligently, meets all milestones, and launches the app on time.
   • Result: The company gains a loyal customer base and investor confidence.
2. Case Study: Political Campaign
   
   • Promise: A political candidate promises to reduce crime rates by 20% within their first year in office.
   • Action: Once elected, the candidate implements comprehensive crime reduction strategies and works with community leaders.
   • Result: Crime rates decrease by 25%, and the candidate is re-elected with increased support.
3. Case Study: Personal Commitment
   
   • Promise: A friend promises to help you study for an important exam.
   • Action: The friend dedicates time to help you review and prepare, ensuring you are well-equipped for the exam.
   • Result: You perform well on the exam, and the friendship is strengthened by the reliable support.

Strategies for Aligning Promises and Actions​

1. Set Realistic Goals:
   
   • Ensure that promises are achievable and based on a realistic assessment of resources and capabilities.
2. Clear Communication:
   
   • Communicate clearly and transparently about what can be expected and any changes in the plan.
3. Regular Check-Ins:
   
   • Conduct regular check-ins to monitor progress and address any issues that may arise.
4. Feedback Loops:
   
   • Establish feedback loops to gather input from stakeholders and adjust actions as needed.
5. Accountability Mechanisms:
   
   • Implement accountability mechanisms to ensure that commitments are followed through.

Conclusion​

In both personal and professional contexts, the distinction between promise results and action results is essential. While promises set the expectation and provide motivation, actions are the ultimate measure of success. By ensuring that promises are realistic, communicated clearly, and followed by diligent actions, individuals and organizations can build and maintain strong, trustworthy relationships. The alignment of promises with actions is not just a matter of meeting expectations; it is a fundamental aspect of creating a positive and sustainable impact.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

Promise Results Vs Action Results​

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 5th Feb. 2017

With elections in the major state, political slugfest seems at its peak. On one side we have Netas and parties raising banner of Results that may have been obtained against the promises. On the other hand, parties want to discuss Actions alone rather than the overall results obtained by it for the people. The second case here is trickier. This is because both the party at the center as well as the party or alliance in the state are answerable but both have been elusive. The commercial news media on its count is merely a carrier of the rhetoric from both sides. What people can easily perceive is a failure of job growth as well as a lack of promised unemployment benefits to the youth. However discussions in the commercial news media would steer around the Notebandi action against black money or the Highways et al around development plank. Then of course we have Netas who would pitch up the promise of ‘development of mandir’ as well as ‘development of backward & minorities including reservations’. The last has largely become irrelevant although Netas unable to identify and sell ‘new issues’ still continue to rely on the ‘re-cycled slogans and the ‘independent’ commercial news media also continues to service their audience in accordance, rather than ‘question’ the Netas.

What has been the biggest failure of the commercial news media is that it fails to raise the issue of the quality of governance and link this to re-elections or vote seeking planks of parties’ basis which people may decide to formulate their political opinion. This gives Netas an opportunity whereby which if one side of NEtas get beaten a bit more, the other side of the NEtas claim that they are nothing short of a global phenomenon and are ably supported to do so by the elements within the independent commercial news media with all its claim to be a guardian of public interests, free speech and being the forth pillar of democracy.There have been literary ‘no questions’ why processed food sector has not received any fillip in the country of 1.3 billion, even though the sector is known to be a large employer. While we see support or opposition to Food Retail FDI and Netas with some claiming to be ‘acclaimed economists’ can sell the proposition as job generating as well as streamlining the supply chain, but fail to explain any rationale. So we have the ‘Khet ke Aaloo’ questioning, with the commercial news media sticking to 'public issues' rather than 'one of opinion in social media'. Of course, the rants of the Netas in government around Naxalism or Anti-country nature doesn’t help, but I am sure that such planks doesn’t work and would become fairly evident in the elections when parties are wooing the ‘Charged ones’ for alliance in some of the states. Basically what Netas do not understand is that when they christen rather ‘peaceful protestors or political workers’ as such, it perhaps convinces some people that at least some action is happening somewhere (even if this may not be the real case). So action lovers or seekers are attracted towards that end simply because the alternatives are trying to de-market this one rather trying to be an action center on their own.

What however may be a concern arena is that the parties seem to be lacking alternative policy sets regards macro factors. This is mainly on account that parties present a ‘promise’ manifestos rather than a possible budgets for next 5 years detailing how within the resources, their performance would be different. This can be further substantiated with some other laws and policy around issues that the leaders may want to canvass for support. While a projected budget can be a more realistic way of presenting what may be possible to be done in a realistic manner, however what may be lacking is parties and Netas who may use such method and come up while negotiating the electoral mine successfully. What basically the political competition is about presently, is promises and perception management. Evasive Netas, not wanting to face questions but simply walk away brandishing their super star status trying to make hay in sunshine. The other issue is behavior of the national political parties themselves. Herein if national political party (or any other party) decides to collaborate with any specific party, then all questions over its past are made to seem irrelevant and quite strangely the ‘independent’ commercial news media (at least a section of it) follows suite. It is the other parties and Netas who may still seem to be questioning, however the overall balance is generally tilted towards the new combination. Now there might be some exceptions to this wherein even the new combination is browbeaten, but such cases are rather limited. In fact the journos need to work on to explore & debate this phenomenon otherwise will continue to be overwhelmed by the ‘social media’.

This article offers an exceptional deep dive into the complexities of political policy. The writer's writing style is both analytical and accessible, making intricate policy discussions understandable and engaging for a broad audience. Their ability to translate dense political mechanics into relatable prose is a significant asset, demonstrating a profound understanding paired with strong communication skills. The structure is meticulously organized, systematically breaking down the policy in question and exploring its various facets with a methodical yet engaging approach. This allows readers to grasp the nuances and implications thoroughly. Furthermore, the outstanding clarity of the policy analysis is a defining feature. The arguments are presented with such precision, and the potential outcomes so plainly articulated, that the article becomes an invaluable guide for anyone seeking to understand the real-world impact of political decisions.