NUCLEAR DEAL very serious matter

Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?
Ans. Nuclear Agreement between India - USA :MUST READ BY EVERY INDIAN

There are lot of talks about 1 2 3 Agreement between India & USA and it
almost led to the topple of Central Government. In this mail I am trying

to explain the commercial & technical aspects relating to this Agreement
which I have read and sharing with you.

What is 123 Agreement?

This is called 123 Agreement because this comes under USA's Atomic Power
Act Section 123.
Let's see how India's (Indians?) Sovereinty & Independence are
pledged...

(1) After this Agreement USA will supply all fuel, machinery / equipment
& technology to India for producing Nuclear Power.

(2) All these days from about 22 Nuclear Power Plants, India is
producing power as well as Atom. It's a high security / secret that
from where which is produced, how much is produced, where it is
supplied, what research is being done with that, etc. to anybody. But
if we sign this Agreement, we have to disclose these secrets and also
agree to 14 of our Nuclear Power Plants to be under the scanner of
International Atomic Power Organisation.

(3) The fuel utilised to produce Atomic Power can be recycled for reuse
and this plant will be under direct supervision of IAPO.

If India does nuclear test, this agreement gets cancelled. But

(1) USA will take back all the machinery / equipments / technology
supplied to India thus far.

(2) Those 14 plants will continue to be under scanner irrespective of
the status of the agreement.

On the other hand, if any of the commitments given by USA is breached by
them, then there is no clause for cancelling this agreement.

The agreement is apparently like this... USA can either hug India or
slap India. India will not ask why are we hugged or why are we slapped.

On the other hand, India cannot hug or slap USA for breach of agreement.

This is only capsule so that easy to read and digest.

Subject: India Pledged.... Part 2

Requirement of Power

The most important requirement for India's Economic Growth in the coming
years will be the power & infrastructure. The argument put forth
favouring the 123 Agreement says that we need Nuclear Power Production
to be increased to meet the demand.

Power Production in India

Presently following are the figures:

Thermal Power 66%

Hydel Power 26%

Solar & Wind Power 5% - Presently Rs.600 Crores are spent for producing
this power.

Nuclear Power 3% - If this is to be increased to 6%, it
requires additional Rs.50,000 Crores.

Naturally it will be wise to increase other 3 modes of power production
rather than the expensive & dangerous Nuclear Power. Isn't??

URANIUM

We used to import Uranium from various other countries. After the
Pokran Test, we are not getting it. To augment the supply, we need to
sign the 123 Agreement to get Uranium from USA. But we will have to
declare to USA from which power plant India takes raw material for
producing Atom Bomb. Why should we disclose our internal secrets to
those rascals ? Will any one allow an outsider to continuously monitor
what's happening in your Hall & Kitchen of your house? Other study
reveals that Uranium is available in India aplenty. Only hurdle is the
acquisition of land. To produce Atomic Power & Bomb in the next 40
years, the requirement of Uranium is 25,000 MT whereas the availability
is 78,000 MT across India.

PLUTONIUM

Presently 35% of Plutonium is used to produce Atomic Bombs. After
signing the Agreement, we will be allowed to use only 10%. Who are those
rascals to restrict the usage of our natural resource ? That is though
you are capable of cooking & eating 10 idlis as your breakfast, you are
allowed only 3 idlis henceforth. How can it be? Why should we accept
this?

THORIUM

As told by Dr.APJ, we have abundant Thorium. In fact we are the 2nd
largest producer of Thorium next only to Australia. India has to
explore this further for producing power. For your information, in
South India - particularly around Kanyakumari, the availability of
Thorium is abundant.

INDIA-IRAN-CHINA

USA does not like the amicable relationship between India-Iran and also
India-China. If India-China relationship gets stronger, then both these
can rule the Eastern Part of the Globe which USA wants to break as per
their divide & rule.

By signing this agreement, USA wants India to depend on it for producing
power which is going to be a crucial factor in future. There is a talk
of bringing Natural Gas from Iran to India with a big pipeline project.
USA doesn't like this proposal.

Atomic Power Technology

Whether power is produced or Bomb is produced, using Atomic power
without spoiling the infrastructure and without allowing the radiation
is always under threat. Moreover preserving the wastes coming out of
Atomic Power Plants is expensive & unsafe.

There was an accident in Three Miles Island in USA. To close this plant
nearly USD 200 Crores spent with tons & tons of concrete but yet to be
fully closed.

In an another accident at Soviet Union's Serbia Plant, even the next
generation child are affected due to the radiation.

It will be very very expensive to defuse & close down an Atomic Power
Plant than its construction cost.

France

France has got 56 Nuclear Power stations producing 73% of the country's
total power requirement. They are catching up the problem of
eliminating the wastes / emissions from out of those plants at the same
time increase the power production capacity. Government of France is
now thinking how to reduce the power consumption in the country.
 
Conclusion

In view of the above danger, rather than signing the agreement and
pledging India to USA, it will be prudent to increase the Solar & Wind
Energy and more importantly Hyder Power Production can be increased by
linking all rivers across India and by constructing DAMS. (Ofcourse Dam
construction projects can be given to L&T's B&F Sector:-)

The whole process of this Agreement started in the year 2005 when
Manmohan visited USA. In a span of just 2 years a major decision of
signing this agreement has taken place with political motive. On the
contrary, neither this Government nor any other earlier Central
Government could not amend the Constitution thereby nationalise the
rivers across the country thereby effectively utilise the water
resources for both Agriculture purpose and producing Hydel Power. What
an irony?



Whenever someone is helping the needy, you can't expect the TERMS AND
CONDITIONS BETWEEN THE needy and the helper to be EQUAL??? BUT

(1) the helper's ulterior motive should be seen with broad eye because
he is capable of digging a grave behind you and

(2) better to be self-sufficient and explore new avenues with available
resources.


INDIA-CHINA-USA

India is very rich in Culture, follow Religions, Value Ethics, Level of
Education is Very Good.

China is also rich in Culture, follow Religion, better disciplined.

USA does not have Culture, does not have Ethics, only want power over
others. Particularly wants a firm footing in South Asia. Remember the
introduction EURO by European Countries and it is stronger than Dollar?
So their "DAL" cannot be boiled at "EUROPE". They are trying in India
as already Pakistan is in their clutches.
 
Guys its a serious matter this politicians i dont know are what up to be we being a responsible citizen should know what this netas are doing .

Most of the people dont know what this deal is all about but its one of the most important decison that our country has to make .

guys come on and discuss on this issue and lets come to a amicable conclusion
 
do you guys know how important this topic is for all of us .we have the right and should know what the deal is all about and how it will effect us as a citizen of our country
 
US-India nuclear deal will reduce pollution: Rice


PERTH: US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said a proposed US-India nuclear energy deal is good for both countries and for global efforts to reduce the spread of atomic technology and greenhouse gas emissions.

In her first public comments on the agreement since India's government won a confidence vote that paves its way forward, Rice said on Thursday the administration of US President George W. Bush would press US lawmakers to approve the agreement in the coming months.

"I think we can make a very good case that this is not just a landmark deal but a positive landmark deal," she told reporters aboard her plane as she flew from an Asian security conference in Singapore to Australia.

"It's certainly our hope that we can get through all the processes and get this done in the Congress, and we are going to work very expeditiously toward that goal," Rice said.

Bush called Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Thursday and both leaders expressed a desire to see the nuclear issue move forward as quickly as possible, said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council at the White House.

The pact would end more than three decades of nuclear isolation for India by opening its civilian reactors to international inspections in exchange for the nuclear fuel and technology. Previously, India had been denied such outside help because of its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and its testing of atomic weapons.

But Rice said India has a good record of not spreading its nuclear technology and that safeguards are built into the deal. She added its approval would help India meet its huge demand for energy without using oil, coal and other petroleum products.

"India is a country that has tremendously growing demand for energy," she said. "It is a country that, if it tries to meet that demand through carbon-based sources for energy, is going to contribute dramatically to the continued growth of greenhouse gas emissions."

India imports about 75 per cent of its oil, and Singh has argued the country needs the nuclear deal to power its financial growth and lift hundreds of millions of its 1.1 billion citizens out of poverty.

On Tuesday, Singh was forced to call a confidence vote after communist political parties withdrew their support for his government this month to protest the agreement, fearing it would draw India closer to the United States.

Though Singh made enemies in his bid to push ahead with the nuclear deal, he had the backing of India's powerful business community and won the vote.

In addition to congressional approval, the deal requires India to strike separate agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency as well as the Nuclear Suppliers' Group of countries that export nuclear material.

Rice made her comments on a flight to Perth, Australia, with Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, a Perth native.


Source from economictimes.com
 
Pranab to canvass for N-deal at Tehran NAM meet

Tuesday, 29 July , 2008,


Lobbying hard for the Indo-US nuclear deal, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee is in Tehran to seek support of NAM countries who are members of the UN atomic watchdog IAEA and the 45-member NSG.

Mukherjee, who arrived in the Iranian capital on Monday to take part in the Non-Aligned Movement ministerial meeting, is scheduled to hold talks with his counterpart from Algeria, which is part of the 35-member IAEA Board of Governors who will meet on August 1 to take up the India-specific safeguards agreement.

Mukherjee will also meet the foreign ministers of Cyprus and Belarus, which are members of the Nuclear Suppliers group. During the meeting, he is expected to brief the leaders on the safeguards agreement that is crucial to the implementation of the civil nuclear deal.

Other NAM countries, which are part of the International Atomic Energy Agency, are Egypt and Ghana while South Africa is a member of the NSG.

The Minister, who was received at the Mehrabad airport by senior Iranian Ministry officials and Indian diplomats, will also meet his counterpart from Cuba Felibe Perez Rogue who is chairing the 15 NAM ministerial meet.

Mukherjee will also meet Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchechr Mottaki and is expected to discuss the progress on the $7.4 billion, tri-nation IPI gas pipeline project that is being opposed by the US.

Mukherjee is also likely to meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, who recently took part in talks in Geneva over its disputed nuclear programme attended by a top US diplomat for the first time.

Permanent Security Council members — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — plus Germany have made Iran an offer, which includes trade incentives and help with a civilian nuclear programme in return for suspending enrichment.

Mukherjee will also address the ministerial meeting of the 118-member NAM and seek international support in the fight against terrorism especially by rallying countries behind the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism.

The minister is attending the meet close to a spate of bombings in Bangalore and Ahmedabad, which drew international condemnation.

The minister will fly to Colombo from Tehran to take part in the SAARC ministerial meeting.
 
Back
Top