Media Frenzy and Fishermen

Media Frenzy and Fishermen

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 25th May 2017

While media is focused on the Western borders and on the braggadocios, the order of a court to Release Fishermen & some 300 or more, is ignored or underplayed by it. This is while measures like these ought to be welcome and on or from both sides subject to their implementation in line with the globally established legal good practices. That seems to be an area where the feudalistic netas as well as ‘professionals’ in the governments (on both sides), being least comfortable around. This is because that is something they would like to go to ‘any length to avoid’. The commercial news media plays its role by playing the issues up or down in line with the likes and dislikes of the netas and that seemingly allows ordinary people like the Fishermen to be used as pawns for little or almost no mistake (since chasing a shoal of fish in the sea can hardly be deemed as some big crime unless ulterior intent or repeated violations of the laws in sea). In fact it is irony that while the country can establish an expensive Tsunami Warning system for some incident which has rather limited or nil occurrence (based on my rather limited knowledge of history), however there seems no system capable of warning the Fishermen. While we have created a Satellite system for the entire south asia, its application to create some sea map available on some small battery operated GPS guidance system to be deployed on Fishing boats which can warn those Fishermen (of respective countries) and may be mandatory for all fishermen in the region, has still got no takers. Such measures can boost interest as well as some revenues for the ‘common satellite’ or other similar infrastructure (creation as well as maintenance). The best thing is that the political netas won’t like to collaborate or discuss such issues, but rather like to ‘maintain the problem’.

Only recently have some steps be initiated like improved connectivity with nearby countries and better trade facilitation measures. Those steps need to be further bolstered to have an improved regional cross investment environment whereby the businesses in these countries can invest into each other and promote mutual interests as well as trade. Such steps have a rather beneficial impact on overall economic activity and can be scaled up very fast, rather some globalized scheme where only limited influence can be exerted. However a commercial news media playing issues up or down depending upon its ‘own views and interests’ rather than public interest, would rather work to maintain problems.

To be cont.

 

[Swaswati Borpuzari]

Media Frenzy and Fishermen: The Intersection of Traditional Livelihoods and Modern Sensationalism​

In the age of instant information and constant media consumption, the lives of fishermen, often seen as a symbol of traditional and sustainable living, have become a focal point for various forms of media. From documentary films to viral social media posts, the stories of these maritime workers are increasingly being captured and shared, sometimes leading to a media frenzy that can have both positive and negative impacts on their communities and way of life.

The allure of the sea​

Fishermen have long been romanticized in literature and culture, often depicted as rugged individuals who battle the elements to provide sustenance for their families and communities. This romanticization extends to the media, where the lives of fishermen are often portrayed as a blend of adventure, struggle, and deep connection to nature. Documentaries like "The Perfect Storm" and "Deadliest Catch" have captivated audiences, providing a glimpse into the harsh realities and the thrill of life at sea.

Media as a double-edged sword​

While media coverage can bring much-needed attention to the challenges faced by fishermen, such as overfishing, environmental degradation, and economic pressures, it can also sensationalize their lives in ways that are misleading or harmful. For instance, the focus on the dangers of fishing can sometimes overshadow the resilience and community spirit that are integral to the profession. This can lead to a distorted public perception, where fishermen are seen primarily as victims rather than as active participants in their own destinies.

Moreover, the media's tendency to prioritize dramatic and extreme stories can create a skewed narrative. Reports of rare and catastrophic events, such as severe storms or fatal accidents, may dominate headlines, while the everyday struggles and triumphs of fishermen go unnoticed. This can not only misrepresent the true nature of their work but also lead to policies and public opinions that are based on incomplete or biased information.

The impact on fishing communities​

The media frenzy can have significant effects on fishing communities. On the positive side, it can raise awareness about the importance of sustainable fishing practices and the need for better regulation to protect marine ecosystems. For example, the documentary "Seaspiracy" sparked a global conversation about the environmental impact of the fishing industry, leading to increased support for sustainable fishing initiatives and marine conservation efforts.

However, the negative impacts are also considerable. Sensationalized media coverage can lead to a decline in consumer confidence in seafood, affecting the livelihoods of fishermen. False or exaggerated claims can damage the reputation of entire industries, making it harder for honest and responsible fishermen to sell their catch. Additionally, the invasive nature of media attention can disrupt the peace and privacy of fishing communities, sometimes leading to conflicts or resentment.

Empowering fishermen through media​

Despite these challenges, media can also be a powerful tool for empowerment. When used responsibly, it can give fishermen a platform to share their stories, advocate for their rights, and educate the public about the true nature of their work. For example, local news outlets and community-based media projects can highlight the efforts of fishermen who are adopting sustainable practices, using technology to improve safety, and working to preserve their traditional ways of life.

Social media, in particular, has provided fishermen with a direct line to their audience. Many fishermen now use platforms like Instagram and YouTube to share videos of their daily routines, the beauty of the sea, and the joys and challenges of their profession. This not only helps to humanize them but also fosters a sense of connection and understanding between consumers and producers.

Conclusion​

The intersection of media and the lives of fishermen is a complex and dynamic space. While media attention can bring important issues to the forefront and help build support for sustainable practices, it can also perpetuate harmful stereotypes and create real-world problems for fishing communities. It is crucial for journalists, filmmakers, and social media creators to approach these stories with sensitivity and a deep commitment to accuracy and fairness. By doing so, they can help ensure that the media frenzy around fishermen serves to uplift and support these vital yet often overlooked members of our global community.

 

[Dhruv Bindhani]

Media Frenzy and Fishermen

By: Amit Bhushan Date: 25th May 2017

While media is focused on the Western borders and on the braggadocios, the order of a court to Release Fishermen & some 300 or more, is ignored or underplayed by it. This is while measures like these ought to be welcome and on or from both sides subject to their implementation in line with the globally established legal good practices. That seems to be an area where the feudalistic netas as well as ‘professionals’ in the governments (on both sides), being least comfortable around. This is because that is something they would like to go to ‘any length to avoid’. The commercial news media plays its role by playing the issues up or down in line with the likes and dislikes of the netas and that seemingly allows ordinary people like the Fishermen to be used as pawns for little or almost no mistake (since chasing a shoal of fish in the sea can hardly be deemed as some big crime unless ulterior intent or repeated violations of the laws in sea). In fact it is irony that while the country can establish an expensive Tsunami Warning system for some incident which has rather limited or nil occurrence (based on my rather limited knowledge of history), however there seems no system capable of warning the Fishermen. While we have created a Satellite system for the entire south asia, its application to create some sea map available on some small battery operated GPS guidance system to be deployed on Fishing boats which can warn those Fishermen (of respective countries) and may be mandatory for all fishermen in the region, has still got no takers. Such measures can boost interest as well as some revenues for the ‘common satellite’ or other similar infrastructure (creation as well as maintenance). The best thing is that the political netas won’t like to collaborate or discuss such issues, but rather like to ‘maintain the problem’.

Only recently have some steps be initiated like improved connectivity with nearby countries and better trade facilitation measures. Those steps need to be further bolstered to have an improved regional cross investment environment whereby the businesses in these countries can invest into each other and promote mutual interests as well as trade. Such steps have a rather beneficial impact on overall economic activity and can be scaled up very fast, rather some globalized scheme where only limited influence can be exerted. However a commercial news media playing issues up or down depending upon its ‘own views and interests’ rather than public interest, would rather work to maintain problems.

To be cont.

This article offers an exceptional deep dive into the complexities of political policy. The writer's writing style is both analytical and accessible, making intricate policy discussions understandable and engaging for a broad audience. Their ability to translate dense political mechanics into relatable prose is a significant asset, demonstrating a profound understanding paired with strong communication skills. The structure is meticulously organized, systematically breaking down the policy in question and exploring its various facets with a methodical yet engaging approach. This allows readers to grasp the nuances and implications thoroughly. Furthermore, the outstanding clarity of the policy analysis is a defining feature. The arguments are presented with such precision, and the potential outcomes so plainly articulated, that the article becomes an invaluable guide for anyone seeking to understand the real-world impact of political decisions.