Doctors are treated as servants: Trehan

In a partial reprieve for Dr Naresh Trehan, who was ousted from the position of executive director of Escorts Heart Institute on Friday, the Delhi High Court on Saturday ruled that he can operate in and manage the hospital till August 6. The court said that Dr Trehan can have unrestricted entry into the hospital till then.

This ruling came on a day of high drama in which the Fortis Healthcare management filed a case of vandalism against Dr Trehan and alleged that he trespassed into prohibited areas of the hospital. “He has forced his way into the hospital and behaved like a juvenile. We have filed a police case for what he did. It is trespassing and vandalism,” Fortis Healthcare MD Shivinder Mohan Singh told the media on the 4th floor of Escorts hospital.

A few hours later and two floors below, after emerging from the operating theatre, a defiant Dr Trehan hit back: “I have not touched anything. I just touched my patients. It is a desperate move on the part of the management.”
Dr Trehan contested the right of Fortis to terminate his contract and claimed that he had a contract with the Escorts Heart Society which expires only in 2010. “Under no moral or legal authority can they terminate my contract. As a professional I will continue to treat my patients in the hospital.’’

Accusing Fortis, which acquired Escorts Heart Institute in 2005, of various wrongdoings, Dr Trehan said: “ I have become inconvenient to the management as I live by the law.” He added that there was a 200% case for legal action against his dismissal.

Listing the litany of misdemeanours, Dr Trehan said, “ The leases of Jassaram Hospital, Rajan Dhall hospital and Escorts have been cancelled. The cost of operation has increased from Rs 1.75 lakh to Rs 2.20 lakh in the last two years; even the rate of audiography has gone up in the hospital when the whole world has brought it down.”
Then came the punchline from Delhi’s most famous heart surgeon: “Doctors are looked down upon and treated as servants!” The doctors and staff ET spoke to also seemed to be solidly behind Dr Trehan.

While Dr Trehan claims he was not informed of the management’s decision to remove him, Mr Shivinder Mohan Singh counters, “I personally spoke to him and a letter was also given to him before the announcement. It is because of his stature that we waited for two years. Talks were going on for the merger of his Medicity with Escorts but it had failed. It is the prerogative of the institute to take decisions to remove an employee.”

Top executives from the company alleged that Dr Trehan was hand-in-glove with Anil Nanda, who challenged his older brother Rajan Nanda’s sale of Escorts Heart Institute to Fortis and “wanted to own the hospital.”

Before the fracas began, a group of about 70 people, mostly relatives of patients, protesting against Dr Trehan’s removal broke open his room. One relative even alleged that the move was similar to an “attempt to murder a patient.”
 
Dude,

I take it you dont believe everything this guy says? The press loves sensationalism in this country, you should know that. Look a little deeper and you'll see the back story. This Trehan guy, good surgeon though he may be, and i dont think anyone is saying he is not, ultimately got undone because of his own greed. The problem, it seems according to various sources, was that he was used to running escorts how he wanted, and that included making the institute his personal honey pot and cookie jar that he could dip into from time to time.

Now you tell me, if you, as an owner and manager who is accountable to his shareholders, see this and know this, and then are faced with the added prospect of a guy who is willing to comprmise his operational responsibility - impacting your balance sheet - to promote his own private project, then clearly, from ANY angle, THAT IS JUST NOT ON. Would you stand for it?

Indian's, i am afraid to say, have this tendency to slavishly want to beleive that the so called 'haves' are evil and that a doctor must somehow be 'purer' and 'untainted'. Well, thats what suits the person and that's what they will want you to believe, it makes them seemingly untouchable ('how can you lay your hands on me when i want to do public service?') - simple point - why doesn't anyone ask Trehan what his salary and compensation structure was with FHL? It was probably pretty damn good.

The point is this, just because a person has done good and is good at what they do, does not mean they can have a carte blanche to do what the hell they want as an employee. It does not give them the moral authority to assert that they can do as they please, especially if it compormises their ability to perform their duties as an employee. Add conflicts of interest to the mix, and you have a very good case for dismissal.

Respect is one thing, and i thing two years of trying by FHL shows that they have damn well respected this guy. They just could not have him any more.

Trehan should have some honor and decency. At least return the decency shown to him by FHL. Look at all the stories from 2005, FHL trying to partner Trehan etc... its not like these guys didn't try their best to get along with this guy. There are interviews by the FHL management on national TV where they have said Trehan is the an excellent doctor and a real asset to FHL. Clearly then there must be a damn good reason for this dismissal. Come on, these guys have advisors and they would have decided to go ahead with this KNOWING the likely consequences. That they still did indicates how much they had had it with Trehan.

Sorry if i sound like ranting, its just that, as an investor in FHL, it irritates the hell out of me when people question an organisation's ability to manage (For God's sake, they've built a national healthcare brand in 5 years since 2001!) based on the unsubstantiated claims of a man, a doctor, who is known to have been irresponsible in his prefession in the past, e.g. many say he is a very active social cat who loves drinking, and has in past gotten drunk the night before surgeries (great if he recovers in time, but good luck to a patient if he does not).

If you were a publicly held organisation, employing such a person, with a known conflict of interest, showing up in substantiated lowered administrative (not medical) performance, would you be able to tell your shareholders with a straight face that this guy is good for your business?

Just my two cents as a FHL investor. Just want to be give the other side of the story so that people know that there is more than meets the eye or what the press focus on.
 
Ha ha, wasn't trying to shoot Melroy. Glad you took it in the right spirit. Just wanted to give the other side. What Trehan tried to do is no better than a politician playing to the gallery to build support.

You know what the prob is of course, people are myopic, forget very easily, and relate to what they suffer through, which is repression in India. Seriously man, we're one repressed society and when we get the chance to blow off some steam we REALLY BLOW without really caring about the other side of the story.

Ciao, good luck with your management studies and career.
 
Do you think i care about both the sides of the story:P well see my profile...take a good look at my snap...nahh man! im more worried about such stuff comming as case studies in my subjects...:P anyways...i appreciate ur thoughts! not many tell what they feel!
 
its wrong..................

doctors make so much moneyyy....

den u say dey act as servants...lol

f**kers charge so much thru bluffin patients......
 
Back
Top