Digital & Cash-less: A reversal seems unlikely
By: Amit Bhushan Date: 26th Dec. 2016
The political parties are taking political lines with increasing speed in the social media yug to take on rivals while not losing on the timing front. Sometimes this can get stretched to even ignore supporters who may have catapulted the netas and parties in their current respective positions. In fact rather than responding to jobless-ness, sudden burst of anger seem to be on Cash-less transactions. And instead of local language digitization drives which has potential to lay out new paradigm and create new digital natives, along with local jobs, some of the parties could be taking positions against the same. Their stand on push for waterways is unclear or hazy at best. This is while their job creation agenda is either flagging or is entirely confused with rather limited progress. In fact nearly all parties have chosen to be silent regards improving Judiciary’s capacity and capabilities while their unity is on display while cold shouldering reforms in cricket, as proposed by the Apex court.
It doesn’t help either that the track-record of the party/leader on issues like secularism and industrialization might be dotted at best. And also there wasn’t much criticism for earlier Mega-mall on resources. There has been little improvement in agricultural or rural stress in W. Bengal, although the party might have gained on account to its support for the boundary settlement. While a political party or leader questioning on something not yielding results or bringing adverse results, can be expected. However political resistance for sectors where the domestic competitiveness is not in doubt and which are growing on a faster clip worldwide, is something that would require an explanation In fact such a move would result in improved jobs on the back of it, a rise in real estate and associated sector. In fact the political leadership should be better off while promoting such trends and champion its wider adoption even in other countries.
It is curious that the parties or netas haven’t raised any questions on policy slogans which have yielded little result be it on Swachhta or even domestic manufacturing. These may have consumed resources while permanency of results or gains by public is a mixed bag, as of yet. While some level of different opinion on demonetization including some of the stronger position against, can be understood. However, the positions being taken against cash-less or digitalization including local language internet would perhaps come under question. In fact parties/netas taking a cagey position on the same would also come under questions at some point of time, even if it may be from the commercial news media which would rather remain a carrier of rhetoric. This is because such policy position seem to be against larger interests and counting only for the interests of the corrupt netas/bureaucrats and public is increasingly game with capabilities to surprise. Let’s see the ‘game’ evolve further…
By: Amit Bhushan Date: 26th Dec. 2016
The political parties are taking political lines with increasing speed in the social media yug to take on rivals while not losing on the timing front. Sometimes this can get stretched to even ignore supporters who may have catapulted the netas and parties in their current respective positions. In fact rather than responding to jobless-ness, sudden burst of anger seem to be on Cash-less transactions. And instead of local language digitization drives which has potential to lay out new paradigm and create new digital natives, along with local jobs, some of the parties could be taking positions against the same. Their stand on push for waterways is unclear or hazy at best. This is while their job creation agenda is either flagging or is entirely confused with rather limited progress. In fact nearly all parties have chosen to be silent regards improving Judiciary’s capacity and capabilities while their unity is on display while cold shouldering reforms in cricket, as proposed by the Apex court.
It doesn’t help either that the track-record of the party/leader on issues like secularism and industrialization might be dotted at best. And also there wasn’t much criticism for earlier Mega-mall on resources. There has been little improvement in agricultural or rural stress in W. Bengal, although the party might have gained on account to its support for the boundary settlement. While a political party or leader questioning on something not yielding results or bringing adverse results, can be expected. However political resistance for sectors where the domestic competitiveness is not in doubt and which are growing on a faster clip worldwide, is something that would require an explanation In fact such a move would result in improved jobs on the back of it, a rise in real estate and associated sector. In fact the political leadership should be better off while promoting such trends and champion its wider adoption even in other countries.
It is curious that the parties or netas haven’t raised any questions on policy slogans which have yielded little result be it on Swachhta or even domestic manufacturing. These may have consumed resources while permanency of results or gains by public is a mixed bag, as of yet. While some level of different opinion on demonetization including some of the stronger position against, can be understood. However, the positions being taken against cash-less or digitalization including local language internet would perhaps come under question. In fact parties/netas taking a cagey position on the same would also come under questions at some point of time, even if it may be from the commercial news media which would rather remain a carrier of rhetoric. This is because such policy position seem to be against larger interests and counting only for the interests of the corrupt netas/bureaucrats and public is increasingly game with capabilities to surprise. Let’s see the ‘game’ evolve further…
