Civic Bodies, Procedures & the Media
By: Amit Bhushan Date: 6th April 2017
The elections for corporators in the Capital’s civic bodies seem to have taken curious turns at least for the media, if not for the people. Why is this said is because the commercial news media seem to be focused about various procedures and rules being followed or not. Even illiterate rehri/patri-wallas can understand the bizarre witch-hunt to ‘fix’ the responsibilities. Nearly every ‘independent’ news channel has in some way or the other raised the ‘issue’ but curiously only at the ‘state’ level. Whatever happens to the rules and procedures at the ‘Local bodies level’ is ‘no one’s concern’ in our ‘independent’ news media. This is not to say that ‘holier than thou’ claims should not be examined, or a constitutional position be ignored or belittled; however the ‘independent’ media giving a miss to similar transgressions in the concerned authority/ies where elections are due, is being questioned.
If confronted with the fact, one would find journos running for cover. Not only would they lack information about the ‘rules and procedures’ but also would be just enumerating those handful of areas/instances where such procedures were indeed followed, for reasons known and understood by ‘all’. To its discredit, the ‘Common People’s Party’ has almost failed to bring this point to fore which should have been done perhaps long back. For starters, if had lacked any investigative machinery then it should have worked perhaps much harder with the Judiciary by referring ‘cases’ to them, instead of just trying to work around in a tumultuous bureaucracy with shifting allegiance. I am sure to this the any constitutional body would not have raised fingers in the current political context.
Among some of the other failures has been just too many fragments and sub-groups often not pulling in a uniform direction. This is then played out to highlight that Netadom is perhaps not suited to non-political families, and only ‘they’ can perhaps strike the right chords (implied as creation of the right ‘dependencies’ and ‘be equipped with ‘right information’) to maintain a following of ‘workers’ some of whom may have winning potential. The other has been losing sight of the big picture and focused perhaps too much on handicaps and moves of the political opponent. Had this not been case, the party might have found a far bigger opportunity to have a 'rules and procedures' driven local body rather than abolishing of municipal taxes. It is perhaps time to go back to vision rather than political tactics.
The other aspect which is strangely not being questioned in mefia is ‘results’, which may have its impact. The party in power somehow has come to conclusions that by announcing change of Netas enmasse, absolves them of responsibilities to declare what has been achieved by their ‘term’ in power. The commercial news media remains hand in glove even though the Journos would reluctantly admit that this is not in keeping with the mood of the electorate, however would still not mind having ‘back hand dealings’ to keep such ‘talks’ at a low ebb while at the same time maintaining an 'air of independence'. Let’s see the ‘Game’ evolve further…
By: Amit Bhushan Date: 6th April 2017
The elections for corporators in the Capital’s civic bodies seem to have taken curious turns at least for the media, if not for the people. Why is this said is because the commercial news media seem to be focused about various procedures and rules being followed or not. Even illiterate rehri/patri-wallas can understand the bizarre witch-hunt to ‘fix’ the responsibilities. Nearly every ‘independent’ news channel has in some way or the other raised the ‘issue’ but curiously only at the ‘state’ level. Whatever happens to the rules and procedures at the ‘Local bodies level’ is ‘no one’s concern’ in our ‘independent’ news media. This is not to say that ‘holier than thou’ claims should not be examined, or a constitutional position be ignored or belittled; however the ‘independent’ media giving a miss to similar transgressions in the concerned authority/ies where elections are due, is being questioned.
If confronted with the fact, one would find journos running for cover. Not only would they lack information about the ‘rules and procedures’ but also would be just enumerating those handful of areas/instances where such procedures were indeed followed, for reasons known and understood by ‘all’. To its discredit, the ‘Common People’s Party’ has almost failed to bring this point to fore which should have been done perhaps long back. For starters, if had lacked any investigative machinery then it should have worked perhaps much harder with the Judiciary by referring ‘cases’ to them, instead of just trying to work around in a tumultuous bureaucracy with shifting allegiance. I am sure to this the any constitutional body would not have raised fingers in the current political context.
Among some of the other failures has been just too many fragments and sub-groups often not pulling in a uniform direction. This is then played out to highlight that Netadom is perhaps not suited to non-political families, and only ‘they’ can perhaps strike the right chords (implied as creation of the right ‘dependencies’ and ‘be equipped with ‘right information’) to maintain a following of ‘workers’ some of whom may have winning potential. The other has been losing sight of the big picture and focused perhaps too much on handicaps and moves of the political opponent. Had this not been case, the party might have found a far bigger opportunity to have a 'rules and procedures' driven local body rather than abolishing of municipal taxes. It is perhaps time to go back to vision rather than political tactics.
The other aspect which is strangely not being questioned in mefia is ‘results’, which may have its impact. The party in power somehow has come to conclusions that by announcing change of Netas enmasse, absolves them of responsibilities to declare what has been achieved by their ‘term’ in power. The commercial news media remains hand in glove even though the Journos would reluctantly admit that this is not in keeping with the mood of the electorate, however would still not mind having ‘back hand dealings’ to keep such ‘talks’ at a low ebb while at the same time maintaining an 'air of independence'. Let’s see the ‘Game’ evolve further…