Assessing Influence Of Firm Characteristics On The Effect Of Mobile Phone Services On Firm

Description
This criteria concerning assessing influence of firm characteristics on the effect of mobile phone services on firm.

12

I nternational J ournal of Economics
and
Management Sciences
Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21

MANAGEMENT
JOURNALS
managementjournals.org

ASSESSING INFLUENCE OF FIRM CHARACTERISTICS ON THE EFFECT OF MOBILE
PHONE SERVICES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE:
A Case Study of Thika Town in Kenya

Lucy N. Maina Kiganane
1
, Professor H.Bwisa
2
and Dr J. M. Kihoro
3

1
Department of Entrepreneurship and Procurement, School of Human Resource Development,
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology, E-mail: [email protected]
2
School of Human Resource Development, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology
3
Department of Statistics & Actuarial Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of firm characteristics on the effect of mobile phone
services on firm performance. The study was carried out in Thika town in Kenya. It adopted an exploratory
design where a two-stage, Stratified and Simple random sampling, technique was employed. A total of 120
questionnaires were self- administered yielding a response rate of 100%. Data was subjected to detailed
exploratory analysis through descriptive procedures. Results revealed that firm characteristics have no
statistical significant influence on the effect of Mobile phone services on firm performance.

Keywords: Mobile Phone Services, Manufacturing firms, Performance, effect, Firm characteristics

1.0 BACKGROUND
Entrepreneurship and innovation are of fundamental importance to our economy as they spur economic growth
and wealth creation (Barringer and Ireland, 2008). There is wide agreement among economists that
entrepreneurship is a crucial factor in the diffusion of new technologies (Science, 2001), international
competitiveness, and the creation of new jobs.

Schumpeter (1883-1950) in his theory of economic development constructed a theory in which the entrepreneur
is the source of all dynamic change in the market. In 1934, Schumpeter, whose contribution to entrepreneurship
development is globally recognized, emphasized the process of ‘creative destruction’, indicating how
entrepreneurial innovations make current products and technologies obsolete and fuel economic activity for new
products. Kizner (1973), who is also widely recognized for his contribution to entrepreneurship development,
puts emphasis on two main aspects: “alertness” to new opportunities and seizing an opportunity by taking
further innovative actions. According to his theory, he suggests that alertness leads to the discovery of new
opportunities and innovative actions.

Innovation has become more globalized over the last decade and its importance as a driver of competitive
advantage in economies has increasingly grown. It is a very critical element in entrepreneurship since it is the
ticket to delivering better unique products and services, new and more efficient production processes, and
improved business performance. Innovation involves the creation of new designs, concepts and ways of doing
things, their commercial exploitation and subsequent diffusion through the rest of the economy and society
(Wickham, 2006).

The great expansion of information and communication technologies that has taken place during the last decade
has set the stage for a new age of opportunities and challenges. The adoption of internet, mobile telephony and
broadband networks in many developed countries has been found to have positive effect on firm performance.
They provide speedy, inexpensive and convenient means of communication. According to the World Bank
(2006), “firms that use ICT grow faster, invest more, and are more productive and profitable than those that do
not”.
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

13

Quite a few studies on the application of mobile phone services in firm operations have been published (Matskin
and Tveit, 2001; Lee 2001; Kannan et al.; 2001. Balasubramanian et al., 2002). However, very little has been
done to assess the influence of firm characteristics on the effect of mobile phone services on performance of
manufacturing firms. The manufacturing sector in Kenya contributes around 13% to GDP and this has remained
largely unchanged since 1995 (Kenya Association of manufacturers, 2006). It is therefore a key sector in the
error of economic recovery and transforming Kenya into an industrialized nation in the year 2030. A firm’s
success rests to a very large extent on its ability to innovate and pursue new opportunities. Successful firms must
seize every opportunity to use new technology, methods or ways of doing things. They must aim at coming up
with new differentiated and unique products or services so as to gain a competitive edge over other similar
ventures. This study aimed at investigating the influence of firm characteristics on the effect of mobile phone
services on performance of manufacturing firms in Thika town.

1.1 Statement of the Problem
Strategies for enhancing competitiveness in manufacturing firms have become the need of the hour (Rao &
Soumya, 2007). Entrepreneurs are in the habit of advancing entrepreneurial aspects of a venture, looking for
new ways of doing things in the market so as to be unique, gain and maintain a competitive edge. They delight
in destabilizing the market equilibrium and reaping maximum profits before the competitors venture into the
same market.

Technology and its effective use in organizations has received much attention in the literature, firms have
continued to invest large amounts of resources in mobile phone services hoping that good returns will be
realised ( Weil, 1992). A number of research studies to establish the contribution of mobile phone services to
firm performance (Bender, 1986; Cron & Sobol, 1983; Turner, 1985; Lucas, 1975; Strassmann, 1985) have been
carried out. Past studies reveal that firm characteristics can greatly affect entrepreneurial development. Mohd
(2005) documented that firm characteristics play a pivotal role in determining not only the performance of the
firm but also how well entrepreneurship has been developed in firms. A study by Wiklund and Shepherd (2005)
indicated that firms that are able to align certain firm features with the characteristics of the environment
outperform other firms. Empirical studies have therefore documented that a positive relationship exist between
firm attributes and entrepreneurial development. However the influence of firm characteristics on the effect of
mobile phone services on firm performance is not exactly known. This study therefore sought to determine the
extent to which firm characteristics influence the effect of mobile phone services on performance of
manufacturing firms in Thika town.

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
Systematic review of literature was undertaken in four phases: The Disruptive Innovation Model, ICT and firm
performance, Mobile phone and Mobile phone services, Firm characteristics and performance.

2.2. The Disruptive Innovation Model
Innovation can be defined as all the scientific, technological, organizational, financial, and commercial
activities necessary to create, implement, and market new or improved products or processes (OECD, 1999).
The constant changing conditions of the global market forces brings about stiff competition among firms which
means that to survive firms must innovate or else they perish( fig1 ).

Figure 1: Business life cycle
SALES
Innovate
or Perish
Innovate
or Perish
TIME
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

14

In order to survive, firms must adopt disruptive approaches so as to take advantage of competitor weaknesses
and blind spots to create differentiated, defensible growth strategies. The potential of disruptive innovation
includes: Making the ugly attractive to overshot customers who don't value or use all of the benefits of existing
products and providing cheaper, simpler or more convenient solutions.

2.3. Information Communication Technology (ICT)
Economies at all levels are being transformed by the rapid development, adoption, and use of ICT innovations.
In this respect, ICT functions as a new generic general purpose technology, which impacts these economies
both broadly and deeply by generating a wide array of new products, production processes and services
(Brynjolfsson & Kahin, 2000). ICT is routinely deployed in organisations to re-engineer processes, gain new
strategic advantages, or network across organisational boundaries, they change both the internal organisation of
companies and other organisations and the relationships between companies and organisations (OECD, 2002).
A number of studies show that ICT and changes of the internal organisation of firms have significant positive
effects on labour productivity (Bresnahan, Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 2002).

2.4 Mobile Phone Services
A Mobile phone is an important ICT tool for development. It has the ability to easily leapfrog the
infrastructure barriers in remote and rural areas in Africa. It offers “anywhere, anytime" convenience which is a
disruptive innovation advantage.

The rapid technological advancement that the world has witnessed in the recent years especially in the
electronic industry has also changed the means of production around the world (Bwisa, 2010). This can be
evidenced in the telecommunication sector where, since the introduction and evolution of the mobile phones,
the ways and means of business information transfer have changed leading to more efficiency and productivity
in both service and manufacturing sector.
In Kenya Key Mobile phone services include: mobile calls, mobile instant messaging, M-Pesa
1
Mobile bills
payments; Mobile internet browsing and lately banking services e.g. M-kesho.
2
Mobile services are strategic
weapons for enhancing business performance. Several previous researches have explored such opportunities
(Gressgard and Stensaker, 2006; Smith, 2006; Andreou et al, 2005; Buellingen and Woerter, 2004; Mathew et
al, 2004). Pangani (2004) mentions mobility, availability (anytime, anyplace), and personalization as important
benefits of mobile phone services.
2.5 Firm Characteristics
Most manufacturing firms are managed by the entrepreneurs. Both the nature of the firm and the characteristics
of the entrepreneur are quite crucial since they constitute firm characteristics which could tremendously affect
the overall success of a firm. It is therefore critical to investigate the moderating influence of firm
characteristics on the effect of Mobile phone services on firm performance.

Quite a number of studies have been carried out to examine the relationship between firm characteristic and
entrepreneurial activities. Mohd (2005) asserted that firm characteristics seem to play a critical role in
determining the overall performance of the firm. Findings of a study carried out by Wiklund and Shepherd
(2005) indicates that firms that are able to align firm attributes with the characteristics of the environment
outperform other firms. Dean, Bülent and Christopher (2000) documented that firm characteristics are essential
determinants of firm performance and success. However Dean et al., (2000) acknowledged that relationship
between firm characteristics and entrepreneurial performance is a controversial issue in the field of research.

2.6. Critique of existing Literature
A clear picture of the moderating influence of firm characteristics on the relationship between mobile phone
services and firm performance has not emerged from previous studies. The existing body of knowledge is not
sufficient enough to explain the influence of firm characteristics on the effect of mobile phone services on firm
performance.

1
Mobile Phone Money Transfer
2
Mobile banking/saving service

International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

15

3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design
This study adopted exploratory research design to examine the moderating influence of firm characteristics on
the relationship between Mobile Phone services and firm performance.

To investigate this relationship quantitative research approach was employed. Accurate, valid and reliable
conclusions were drawn by engaging descriptive analysis. To ensure a more complete approach to empirical
research, longitudinal data (Weill, 1992; Gretton, Gali & Parham 2002) for the past three years was collected in
a sequence so as to track the magnitude of change that would have taken place. Use of a questionnaire backed
up by field observation revealed some information and data that gave a bearing on the influence of firm
characteristics on the effect of mobile phone services on firm performance of the 120 manufacturing firms
examined. The target population comprised of all Small, Medium and Large manufacturing firms in Thika town
that had been in operation for at least three years. The sampling frame comprised of 200 manufacturing firms.

3.2 Sampling Techniques
In this study the statistics formula for determining the sample size and procedures for categorizing data
(Cochran, 1977) below was adopted to calculate a representative sample.
?=?

Where =0.05 and Z =1.96.
Using the standard values and the formula, a sample of at least 118 manufacturing firms would be
representative. In this study a representative sample of 120 was preferred .A two-stage sampling technique was
employed. In the first stage firms were stratified into three groups (Small, Medium and Large) according to the
number of employees while in the second stage simple random sampling technique was applied where each
manufacturing firm from each stratum was given a serial number in its respective category and the numbers
picked at random. A total number of 14 large, 34 Medium and 72 small manufacturing firms were sampled. The
sample size was therefore 120 in the ratio: 3:7:15 representing Large, Medium and small manufacturing firms
respectively.

3.3 Research Instruments
Data was collected by use of a structured questionnaire and field observation for triangulation purposes. The
questionnaire constituted four parts: Part I contained questions based on the background of the firm, Part II
constituted questions on the usage of mobile phones in the firms, Part III contained questions on a 5 point Likert
scale of 1-Never, 2-Rarely, 3-Sometimes, 4-Often and 5- Very Often testing the contribution of each of the
independent variables and Part IV had questions on the effect of mobile phone services on measuring firm
performance.

3.4 Data Collection Procedures
Secondary data was collected from literature review using desk research approach. A survey of related literature
was undertaken from the internet, journals and other related documents. The Questionnaire was self –
administered with the help of research assistants to the 120 manufacturing firms which had been in operation for
a minimum of three years.

3.5 Data Processing and Analysis
The Data was subjected to detailed exploratory analysis through descriptive procedures. Reliability and internal
consistency of the measurement models were tested using Cronbach’s alpha which is a measure of how closely
related a set of items are as a group. Reliability and internal consistency analysis was employed to indicate the
degree to which performance indicators measured the dependent variable (Firm Performance). A "high" value of
alpha (reliability coefficient of 0.70 and above) is often used as evidence of the fact that the items measure an
underlying (or latent) construct. The closer alpha value is to one the better (indicates internal consistency).

4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE FINDINGS
To analyze the moderating effect of farm characteristics (category of the firm, entrepreneurs’ age and education,
location of the business, gender, religion and form of enterprise ), on the effect of Mobile Phone services on the
dependent variables, in this case the financial and operational aspects of manufacturing firms, tests were carried
out and the results presented graphically.

4.1 Analysis of the effect of Location as a moderating factor
Looking at figure 2, location of the manufacturing firm seems not to have any significant influence on the effect
of mobile call service on firm performance. The magnitude of the influence is the same within the CBD, 2Kms
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

16

away and 5-10 Km away. In all cases mobile phone call service seem to have the greatest effect on performance
signified by mean greater than 3.0 (which is the reference line).

It must be noted that location has a significant influence on the effect of Mpesa on firm performance. It is
highest 2kms from the CBD (probably due to the manufacturing firm’s proximity to the customers or clients
which then does not necessitate frequent money transfer. However it must be noted that even so, its influence is
significantly positive since it is way above the reference line (µ=3). The same scenario is observed for mobile
messaging. However it is interesting to note that the effect of location on the influence of mobile messaging on
firm performance is higher than that of Mpesa 2kms from the CBD which can be explained by the fact that
communication to clients could basically be through sending short messages.

Considering the influence of location on the effect of Mobile banking and Mobile internet, it is important to note
that whereas it has no influence in CBD and 5-10kms away (Below a mean of 3); it has significant influence on
both mobile phone services 2kms away since the mean is above the reference line of 3). In general location has
greater influence on the effect of mobile phone service on firm performance 2kms away from the CBD. This can
be explained by the fact that most manufacturing firms prefer being slightly out of CBD to avoid having to
contend with issues resulting from concentrating businesses within the CBD e.g. packing. Besides most
manufacturing firms 2kms away are more service based as compared to those which are 5kms away which are
product based.
To determine whether there were any significant differences between the means of the three groups of location
one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used. Specifically, to test the null hypothesis:
H
0
: µ
1

2

3
(Mobile internet)
Where µ = group mean

Looking at the results in table 1 below, there was a statistically significant difference between the categories (F
(2, 65) = 5.325, p=0.007) indicating that at least one category differs with the rest. To identify the differing
categories Post Hoc analysis was carried out using Student-Newman-keuls. The results showed that category
1and 3are not significantly different. Category one and two also form a homogeneous subset implying that only
category 1 differ with 2.

Figure2: Effect of Location of the firm as a moderating factor
3.9
3.94 3.93
2.66
3.25
2.66
2.48
3.27
2.68
3.44
3.92
3.56
3.64
3.8
3.66
2.61
3.23
2.87
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
M
e
a
n

Mobile calls
Mobile internet
Mobile Banking
Mobile Messaging
M-pesa
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

17

Table 1 One Way ANOVA for the Three Categories of Location
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean
Square
F Sig.
Mobile calls Between Groups 0.153 2 0.08 0.507 0.604
Within Groups 13.114 87 0.15
Total 13.267 89
Mobile Internet Between Groups 4.899 2 2.45 5.325 0.007
Within Groups 29.898 65 0.46
Total 34.797 67
Mobile Banking Between Groups 3.957 2 1.98 4.971 0.01
Within Groups 25.873 65 0.40
Total 29.83 67
Mobile Messaging Between Groups 2.898 2 1.45 4.789 0.011
Within Groups 21.781 72 0.30
Total 24.679 74
Mobile Pesa Between Groups 1.147 2 0.57 2.05 0.136
Within Groups 20.973 75 0.28
Total 22.119 77
Mobile Bills payment Between Groups 3.226 2 1.61 2.497 0.09
Within Groups 43.273 67 0.65
Total 46.499 69

4.2 Analysis of the Influence of Gender as a moderating factor
This study revealed that manufacturing industry is male dominated with 80.8% of firms owned by men whereas
only 19.2% were owned by women.

Figure 3: Influence of gender as a moderating factor on the effect of mobile phone services
3.91
2.89
2.85
3.59
3.67
2.88
3.99
2.7 2.69
3.76
3.82
2.96
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Mobile calls Mobile
internet
Mobile
Banking
Mobile
Messaging
M-pesa Mobile Bills
payment
M
e
a
n

Male
Female
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

18

The empirical findings of the study reveal that gender influences the effect of some mobile phone services on
the performance of the firm. Looking at figure 3, the influence of mobile phone services on the firms is grouped
with regard to gender of the owner of the firm. The graph shows that gender has great influence on the effect of
mobile phone calls on firm performance. The means for male and female (3.91 and 3.99 respectively) are far
above the average mean or reference line of X is 3. It is important to note that gender influence on the effect of
mobile phone calls on firm performance is highest for female owned manufacturing firms. It is also evident that
M-Pesa and mobile messaging service’s effect on firm performance are influenced to a significant extent by
gender (X is greater than 3) implying that the magnitude of their influence is above the reference line. However,
gender has no significant influence on the effects of mobile banking, mobile internet, and mobile bills payments
on firm performance (means are below the reference line of 3).

To determine whether there were any significant differences in the output in the level of influence between the
male and female, independent samples t-test was conducted (
H0:
µ
m
= µ
f )
and the results revealed that there
was no significant difference in the output in the level of influence between the male and female. The tests were
therefore done but none was found to be significant.

4.3 Analysis of the Influence of Age as a moderating factor.

Figure 4: Influence of age on the effect of mobile phone services

Considering age as a moderating factor Mpesa seems to be prevalent among the slightly older entrepreneurs (45
and above ) in which case it has greater positive influence( far above the reference line of 3 ) on performance of
manufacturing firms owned by entrepreneurs in this age bracket. The supposition here is that the older people
find it easier to carry out transactions by way of money transfer so as to save on money, strain and time. From
the empirical findings (Figure 4) of the possible influence of mobile phone services on firm performance with
regard to the age bracket of the firm owners, mobile phone services such as mobile calls and Mpesa have
positive influence (mean greater than 3.0) in all the age brackets. Mobile messaging had an influence on firm
performance owned by age bracket of 31-44 years and those above 44 years. However, in the age bracket of 25-
30 years, mobile messaging has no influence on the performance of the firm. It is worth noting that Mobile
3.98
2.56
2.88
3.13
3.5
2.55
3.92
2.81 2.81
3.52
3.67
2.82
3.91
2.98
2.87
3.83
3.76
3.07
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Mobile calls Mobile
internet
Mobile
Banking
Mobile
Messaging
M-pesa Mobile Bills
payment
M
e
a
n

25-30 Years
31-44 Years
45 and Above
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

19

banking in all the age brackets does not influence the performance of the firms in any way. Similarly, mobile
internet is not influential in the age bracket of 31-44 and 25-30 but entrepreneurs who are above 44 years find
the use of mobile internet to be slightly influential (mean is slightly above 3.0) on the performance of the their
firms.

To determine whether there were any significant differences in the output in the level of influence at different
age brackets, independent samples t-test was conducted and the results revealed that there was no statistically
significant difference between group means since the means were very close to one another. The tests were
therefore done but none was found to be significant.

4.4 Analysis of the Influence of Religion on the effect of mobile phone services

Figure 5: Influence of religion on the effect of mobile phone services
Empirical analysis of the influence of religion on the effect of mobile phone services on firm performance
indicates that Mobile calls is greatly influenced (mean is above 3.00) for all the firms owned by Christians,
Islam and Hinduism. Similarly effect of Mpesa and Mobile messaging on the performance of manufacturing
firms is significantly influenced by the type of religion the owners profess. However the type of religion the
owners of the manufacturing firms profess has no significant (mean is less than 3.0) influence on the effect of
Mobile internet and Mobile banking on firm performance. Conversely, mobile internet’s effect on firm
performance is slightly positively influenced by the profession of Hindu religion by the owners. Mobile banking
is less influential (less than 3.0) in the performance of firms owned by Hindus. The fact that the owner of the
manufacturing is a Muslim does not influence the effect of mobile internet on firm performance.

3.92
2.84
2.8
3.59
3.77
2.87
3.81
2.95
3.08
3.71
3.35
3.18
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Mobile calls Mobile
internet
Mobile
Banking
Mobile
Messaging
M-pesa Mobile Bills
payment
M
e
a
n

Christianity
Hinduism
Islam

International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

20

To determine whether there were any significant differences in the output in the type of religion the
entrepreneurs profess, independent samples t-test was conducted and the results revealed that there was no
statistically significant difference between group means since the means were very close to one another. The
tests were therefore done but none was found to be significant.

4.5 Discussion of findings
Hashim (2005) asserted that firm characteristics seem to play a vital role in determining the performance of the
firm and can further determine how well the entrepreneurship have been developed in the country. The
empirical findings of this study concur with Hashim’s findings in that firm characteristics were found to
influence the effect of mobile phone services on the performance of manufacturing firm though to a very small
extent
It is important to note that gender influence on the effect of mobile calls on firm performance was highest for
female owned manufacturing firms. This is in tandem with the findings of Venkatesh and Morris [2000], which
revealed that women underline the importance of perceived ease of use both at the adoption stage as well as
after gaining experience with the use of the technology whereas men attach higher importance to perceived
usefulness than women in their decision to use the services both in the short and long run. However Venkatesh
and Morris findings are incompatible with part of the findings of this study which indicated that gender had no
significant influence on the effects of mobile banking, mobile internet, and mobile bills payments on firm
performance.

According to Orloff (2002), location plays a very vital role in the development of entrepreneurship. A
strategically located firm has a greater chance of succeeding. Minai and Igwe (2011) assert that location does
moderate the relationship between firm characteristics and firm performance and infact has strengthened the
relationship between firm characteristics and firm performance. Findings of this study concur with the findings
of past studies in that location has greater influence on the effect of mobile phone service on firm performance
2kms away from the CBD.

From the empirical findings of the possible influence of mobile phone services on firm performance with
regards to the age bracket of the firm owners, mobile phone services such as mobile calls and Mpesa and Mobile
instant messaging potentially advance the effect of mobile phone service on firm performance. This is consistent
with the findings of Lu, Yu, and Liu; (2006) which indicate that age influence technology by indirectly
influencing its use through perceptions and technology use.

4.6 Summary and Conclusion
In summary One Way ANOVA was conducted for farm characteristics such as location, gender, education level,
religion and age bracket of the entrepreneurs, category of the firm and form of the business. In all cases except
location, the results (p>0.05 at ?=0.05) revealed that there was no statistical significant differences between
group means. POST HOC analysis was conducted using the Student-Newman-Keuls to check the statistical
significant differences between independent variables constituting the farm characteristics. In all cases except
location all the categories were not statistically significantly different. Therefore, the means of the effects of
each mobile phone services on each characteristic of the firm were not statistically significantly different from
each other. This implied that there was no statistical significant (p>0.05 at ?=0.05) differences between
independent variables constituting the farm characteristics. In conclusion farm characteristics have no statistical
significant influence on the effect of mobile phone services on firm performance.

REFERENCES
Andreou, A., et al., (2005). Key issues for the design and development of mobile commerce services and
applications. International Journal of Mobile Communications.
Barringer, B.R. & Ireland, R.D. (2008). Entrepreneurship: Successfully launching new ventures, Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Bender D. H. (1986). Financial Impact of Information Processing. Journal of MIS. Vol. 3(2)
Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (2002). Information Technology, Workplace Reorganization,
and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1),
339-376.
Brynjolfson, E. & B. Kahin (2000), Introduction, in Brynjolfson, E. & B. Kahin (2000) (Eds.), Understanding
the Digital Economy. Data, Tools, and Research, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1-10.
Buellingen, F., Woerter, M. (2004). Development perspectives, firm strategies and applications in mobile
commerce. Journal of Business Research, December, Vol. 57.
Bwisa, H. (2010).An Entrepreneurship Approach to use of ICT for Growth of Africa’s Corporative movement:
The case of the mobile phone. A concept paper, Swaziland.
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 10, 2012, pp. 12-21
© Management Journals
h
t
t
p
/
/
:

w
w
w
.
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g

21

Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques(3 Ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cron, W. & Sobol, M. (1983). The Relationship between Computerization and Performance: A Strategy for
Maximizing Economic Benefits of Computerization", Information and Management.
Dean, D. L., and Christopher. P., Bülent Mengüç, 2000. “Revisiting Firm Characteristics, Strategy, and Export
Performance Relationship: A Survey of the Literature and an Investigation of New Zealand Small
Manufacturing Firms”. Industrial Marketing Management , 29: 461–477. [14]
Gressgard, L., Stensaker, I. (2006). The mobile service industry: strategic challenges and future business
models, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 4
Gretton, P.; Gali J.; & Parham, D. (2002). Uptake and impacts of ICTs in the Australian economy: Evidence
from aggregate, sectoral and firm levels, Paper prepared for the Workshop on ICT and Business
Performance OECD, Paris
Hashim, K. M. (2005). Small and Medium-Sized enterprises in Malaysia-Role in Issues. Sintok: UUM Press
Kenya Association of Manufacturers (2006). Kenya Association of Manufacturers Directory 2005/20006.
Nairobi: Kenya Association of Manufacturers
Kizner. I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C. (2006). Gender and Age Differences in Individual decisions about wireless mobile data
Services: A report from China. Proceedings>Proceedings of Helsinki mobility Roundtable. Sprouts:
working papers on information systems 6(34).
Matskin, M. and Tveit, A. (2001). Lee, R. 2001; Kannan, P. et al; 2001. Balasubramanian, S. et al, 2002).
Exploring the implication of M-commerce for markets and marketing. Journal of the Academy of
marketing science, Vol.30 No.4.
Matthew, J.et al., (2004) “M-Commerce Services: Promises and Challenges,” Communications of AIS, Vol.
2004 Issue 14, pp.1-11.
Minai M. & Igwe. E., (2011).The Moderating Effect of Location on Small Firm Performance: Empirical
Evidence. College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Mohd, K. H. 2005. “Small and Medium-Sized enterprises in Malaysia-Role in Isuues”. Sintok: UUM Press. [44]
OECD (1999): Managing National Innovation Systems. OECD, Paris.
OECD (2002), Measuring the Information Economy. The ICT Sector, in OECD Proceedings Science and
Information Technology, 35-69.
Orloff, A. (2002). Social Venture Partners Calgary: Emergence and Early Stages. Canadian Centre for Social
Entrepreneurship.
Pangani, M. (2004). Determinants of adoption of third generation Mobile multimedia services, journal of
Interactive services marketing Vol. 18 No.3
Rao, S. and Soumya, K. J. (2007). Strategies for enhancing competitiveness of firms, Industry sectors and
Country. Institute of management studies & Research, Mumbai.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Science.O. (2001). Technology and Industry Outlook: Drivers of Growth: Information Technology, Innovation.
Paris: OECD.
Smith, A. (2006). International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 4 Issue 6.
Strassmann, P. (1985). Information Payoff, Free Press: New York 1985.
Turner, J. (1985). Organizational Performance, Size and the Use of Data Processing Resources, Proceedings
Third International Conference on Information Systems
Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. 2000. “Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions Gender, social influence,
and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior.” MIS Quarterly, 24: 115-139.
Weill, P. (1992).The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study
of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research.
Wickham, P. A. (2006). Strategic Entrepreneurship, Paper bag Publisher: Financial times/ Prentice Hall.
Wiklund, J., and D., Shepherd, 2005. “Entrepreneurial Orientation And Small Business Performance: A
Configurational Approach”. Journal of Business Venturing , 20, pp.71–91 [64]
World Bank, (2006). Information and Communication for Development: Global Trends and Policies; The World
Bank, Washington, DC.

doc_892136803.pdf
 

Attachments

Back
Top