Description
Analysis of major topics of organizational behaviour at individual, group and organizational level in mezaan bank.
P
a
g
e
1
1.0 Overview:
We are assigned a project of organizational behavior by Col.Tafzil
Hussain to “Analyse the OB Practices in any Organization
with a view to recommend changes”
As organizational behavior subject is of great importance and
value for any organzation, this project enhanced our knoledge
not only theoretically but also practically that ho does the study
of organizational behavior help to analyse the individual,group
and organizational level. The element of recommendation has
broaden our vie to think here the need of rectification lies. We
choosed the ay of !uestionnaire and intervie to conduct
research in "eezan bank #artba chok branch $ahore. We tried
our best to put our efforts ho much e could ith the diverse
knoledge and help of our respected teacher.
2.0 Historical ac!gro"nd o# Organizational
Behavior :
The %reek philosopher &latorote about the essence of leadership.
Aristotle addressed the topic of persuasive communication. The ritings
of '(th century )talian philosopher $iccolo %achiavelli laid the
foundation for contemporary ork on organizational poer and politics.
&n 1''() Adam *mith advocated a ne form of organizational structure
based on the division of labour. *ne hundred years later, %erman
sociologist %a+ ,eer rote about rational organizations and
initiateddiscussion of charismatic leadership. +oon after, -rederic!
,inslow .aylor introduced the systematic use of goal setting and
reards to motivate employees.)n the ',-.s/ Australian0born Harvard
professor /lton %ayoand his colleagues conducted productivity studies
at Western 1lectric2s Hathorne plant in the 3nited +tates.After the 4irst
P
a
g
e
2
World War, the focus of organizational studies shifted to analysis of ho
human factors and psychology affected organizations, a transformation
propelled by the identification of the Hathorne 1ffect. This Human
5elations "ovement focused on teams,motivation, and the actualization
of the goals of individuals ithin organizations. &rominent early
scholars included 0hester Barnard) Henri -ayol) %ary Par!er
-ollett) -rederic! Herzerg) Araham %aslow) 1avid %c0lelland)
and 2ictor 2room.
? %A&$ 0O$.3&B4.O3* .O .H/ -&/51
• 4rederic Winslo Taylor 6'78(0','89:
Taylor as one of the first to attempt to systematically analyze human
behavior at ork. His model as the machine ith its cheap,
interchangeable parts, each of hich does one specific function. Taylor
attempted to do to comple; organizations hat engineers had done to
machines and this involved making individuals into the e!uivalent of
machine parts. &roductivity under Taylorism ent up dramatically.
Analysis of major topics of organizational behaviour at individual, group and organizational level in mezaan bank.
P
a
g
e
1
1.0 Overview:
We are assigned a project of organizational behavior by Col.Tafzil
Hussain to “Analyse the OB Practices in any Organization
with a view to recommend changes”
As organizational behavior subject is of great importance and
value for any organzation, this project enhanced our knoledge
not only theoretically but also practically that ho does the study
of organizational behavior help to analyse the individual,group
and organizational level. The element of recommendation has
broaden our vie to think here the need of rectification lies. We
choosed the ay of !uestionnaire and intervie to conduct
research in "eezan bank #artba chok branch $ahore. We tried
our best to put our efforts ho much e could ith the diverse
knoledge and help of our respected teacher.
2.0 Historical ac!gro"nd o# Organizational
Behavior :
The %reek philosopher &latorote about the essence of leadership.
Aristotle addressed the topic of persuasive communication. The ritings
of '(th century )talian philosopher $iccolo %achiavelli laid the
foundation for contemporary ork on organizational poer and politics.
&n 1''() Adam *mith advocated a ne form of organizational structure
based on the division of labour. *ne hundred years later, %erman
sociologist %a+ ,eer rote about rational organizations and
initiateddiscussion of charismatic leadership. +oon after, -rederic!
,inslow .aylor introduced the systematic use of goal setting and
reards to motivate employees.)n the ',-.s/ Australian0born Harvard
professor /lton %ayoand his colleagues conducted productivity studies
at Western 1lectric2s Hathorne plant in the 3nited +tates.After the 4irst
P
a
g
e
2
World War, the focus of organizational studies shifted to analysis of ho
human factors and psychology affected organizations, a transformation
propelled by the identification of the Hathorne 1ffect. This Human
5elations "ovement focused on teams,motivation, and the actualization
of the goals of individuals ithin organizations. &rominent early
scholars included 0hester Barnard) Henri -ayol) %ary Par!er
-ollett) -rederic! Herzerg) Araham %aslow) 1avid %c0lelland)
and 2ictor 2room.
? %A&$ 0O$.3&B4.O3* .O .H/ -&/51
• 4rederic Winslo Taylor 6'78(0','89:
Taylor as one of the first to attempt to systematically analyze human
behavior at ork. His model as the machine ith its cheap,
interchangeable parts, each of hich does one specific function. Taylor
attempted to do to comple; organizations hat engineers had done to
machines and this involved making individuals into the e!uivalent of
machine parts. &roductivity under Taylorism ent up dramatically.